Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-207
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-207
Submitted as: model evaluation paper
 | 
06 Nov 2017
Submitted as: model evaluation paper |  | 06 Nov 2017
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal GMD but the revision was not accepted.

Evaluating a fire smoke simulation algorithm in the National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) by using multiple observation data sets during the Southeast Nexus (SENEX) field campaign

Li Pan, Hyun Cheol Kim, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, YouHua Tang, Daniel Tong, Barry Baker, Shobha Kondragunta, Chuanyu Xu, Mark G. Ruminski, Weiwei Chen, Jeff Mcqueen, and Ivanka Stajner

Abstract. Multiple observation data sets, including Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) network data, Automated Smoke Detection and Tracking Algorithm (ASDTA), Hazard Mapping System (HMS) smoke plume shapefiles and aircraft acetonitrile (CH3CN) measurements from the NOAA Southeast Nexus (SENEX) field campaign are used to evaluate the HMS-BlueSky-SMOKE-CMAQ fire emissions and smoke plume prediction system. A similar configuration is used in the National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC). The system was found to capture signatures of most of the observed fire signals. Use of HMS-detected fire hotspots and smoke plume information are valuable for both initiating fire emissions and evaluating model simulations. However, we also found that the current system does not include fire contributions through lateral boundary condition and missed fires that are not associated with visible smoke plumes resulting in significant simulation uncertainties. In this study we focused not only on model evaluation but also on evaluation methods. We discuss how to use observational data correctly to filter out fire signals and synergistic use of multiple data sets together. We also address the limitations of each of the observation data sets and of the evaluation methods.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Li Pan, Hyun Cheol Kim, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, YouHua Tang, Daniel Tong, Barry Baker, Shobha Kondragunta, Chuanyu Xu, Mark G. Ruminski, Weiwei Chen, Jeff Mcqueen, and Ivanka Stajner
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Li Pan, Hyun Cheol Kim, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, YouHua Tang, Daniel Tong, Barry Baker, Shobha Kondragunta, Chuanyu Xu, Mark G. Ruminski, Weiwei Chen, Jeff Mcqueen, and Ivanka Stajner
Li Pan, Hyun Cheol Kim, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, YouHua Tang, Daniel Tong, Barry Baker, Shobha Kondragunta, Chuanyu Xu, Mark G. Ruminski, Weiwei Chen, Jeff Mcqueen, and Ivanka Stajner

Viewed

Total article views: 1,715 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,142 462 111 1,715 102 101
  • HTML: 1,142
  • PDF: 462
  • XML: 111
  • Total: 1,715
  • BibTeX: 102
  • EndNote: 101
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,627 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,626 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
In this study, a system accounting for fire emissions in a chemical transport model is described. The focus of this work is to qualitatively evaluate the system's capability to capture fire signals identified by multiple observation data sets. We discuss how to use observational data correctly to filter out fire signals and synergistic use of multiple data sets together. We also address the limitations of each of the observation data sets and of the evaluation methods.