Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-3867-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-3867-2014
Submitted as: methods for assessment of models
 | 
11 Jun 2014
Submitted as: methods for assessment of models |  | 11 Jun 2014
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal GMD. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Parameters sensitivity analysis for a~crop growth model applied to winter wheat in the Huanghuaihai Plain in China

M. Liu, B. He, A. Lü, L. Zhou, and J. Wu

Abstract. Parameters sensitivity analysis is a crucial step in effective model calibration. It quantitatively apportions the variation of model output to different sources of variation, and identifies how "sensitive" a model is to changes in the values of model parameters. Through calibration of parameters that are sensitive to model outputs, parameter estimation becomes more efficient. Due to uncertainties associated with yield estimates in a regional assessment, field-based models that perform well at field scale are not accurate enough to model at regional scale. Conducting parameters sensitivity analysis at the regional scale and analyzing the differences of parameter sensitivity between stations would make model calibration and validation in different sub-regions more efficient. Further, it would benefit the model applied to the regional scale. Through simulating 2000 × 22 samples for 10 stations in the Huanghuaihai Plain, this study discovered that TB (Optimal temperature), HI (Normal harvest index), WA (Potential radiation use efficiency), BN2 (Normal fraction of N in crop biomass at mid-season) and RWPC1 (Fraction of root weight at emergency) are more sensitive than other parameters. Parameters that determine nutrition supplement and LAI development have higher global sensitivity indices than first-order indices. For spatial application, soil diversity is crucial because soil is responsible for crop parameters sensitivity index differences between sites.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
M. Liu, B. He, A. Lü, L. Zhou, and J. Wu
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
M. Liu, B. He, A. Lü, L. Zhou, and J. Wu
M. Liu, B. He, A. Lü, L. Zhou, and J. Wu

Viewed

Total article views: 1,815 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,248 456 111 1,815 91 109
  • HTML: 1,248
  • PDF: 456
  • XML: 111
  • Total: 1,815
  • BibTeX: 91
  • EndNote: 109
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jun 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jun 2014)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024