Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.240
IF 5-year value: 5.768
IF 5-year
CiteScore value: 8.9
SNIP value: 1.713
IPP value: 5.53
SJR value: 3.18
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 71
Scimago H
h5-index value: 51
Volume 3, issue 1
Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 321–328, 2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 321–328, 2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  22 Jun 2010

22 Jun 2010

A fast stratospheric chemistry solver: the E4CHEM submodel for the atmospheric chemistry global circulation model EMAC

A. J. G. Baumgaertner1, P. Jöckel*,1, B. Steil1, H. Tost1, and R. Sander1 A. J. G. Baumgaertner et al.
  • 1Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55020 Mainz, Germany
  • *now at: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234 Weßling, Germany

Abstract. The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy (EMAC) and the atmospheric chemistry box model CAABA are extended by a computationally very efficient submodel for atmospheric chemistry, E4CHEM. It focuses on stratospheric chemistry but also includes background tropospheric chemistry. It is based on the chemistry of MAECHAM4-CHEM and is intended to serve as a simple and fast alternative to the flexible but also computationally more demanding submodel MECCA. In a model setup with E4CHEM, EMAC is now also suitable for simulations of longer time scales. The reaction mechanism contains basic O3, CH4, CO, HOx, NOx, and ClOx gas phase chemistry. In addition, E4CHEM includes optional fast routines for heterogeneous reactions on sulphate aerosols and polar stratospheric clouds (substituting the existing submodels PSC and HETCHEM), and scavenging (substituting the existing submodel SCAV). We describe the implementation of E4CHEM into the MESSy structure of CAABA and EMAC. For some species the steady state in the box model differs by up to 100% when compared to results from CAABA/MECCA due to different reaction rates. After an update of the reaction rates in E4CHEM the mixing ratios in both boxmodel and 3-D model simulations are in satisfactory agreement with the results from a simulation where MECCA with a similar chemistry scheme was employed. Finally, a comparison against a simulation with a more complex and already evaluated chemical mechanism is presented in order to discuss shortcomings associated with the simplification of the chemical mechanism.

Publications Copernicus