the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Multi-Compartment Hg Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP): Mercury modeling to support international environmental policy
Abstract. The Multi-Compartment Hg (mercury) Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP) is an international multi-model research initiative intended to simulate and analyze the geospatial distributions and temporal trends of environmental Hg to inform the effectiveness evaluations of two multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs): the Minamata Convention on Mercury (MC) and Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). This MCHgMAP overview paper presents its science objectives, background and rationale, experimental design (multi-model ensemble (MME) architecture, inputs and evaluation data, simulations and reporting framework), and methodologies for the evaluation and analysis of simulated environmental Hg levels. The primary goals of the project are to facilitate detection and attribution of recent (observed) and future (projected) spatial patterns and temporal trends of global environmental Hg levels, and identification of key knowledge gaps in Hg science and modeling to improve future effectiveness evaluation cycles of the MEAs. The current advances and challenges of Hg models, emission inventories, and observational data are examined, and an optimized multi-model experimental design is introduced for addressing the key policy questions of the MEAs. A common set of emissions, environmental conditions, and observation datasets are proposed (where possible) to enhance the MME comparability. A novel harmonized simulation approach between atmospheric, land, oceanic and multi-media models is developed to account for the short- and long-term changes in secondary Hg exchanges and to achieve mechanistic consistency of Hg levels across environmental matrices. A comprehensive set of model experiments is developed and prioritized to ensure a systematic analysis and participation of a variety of models from the scientific community.
- Preprint
(2769 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 18 Aug 2024)
-
CC1: 'Comment on gmd-2024-65', Panos Panagos, 29 May 2024
reply
This is a very interesting manuscript which address the whole Hg cycle in all media.
As expert in soils, i would recommend that the Hg content in soils is better addressed. Reading the manuscript, you tend to explain the Hg content in soils due to natural factors while there is an important contribution by anthropogenic sources. In EU, we have done a very detailed assessment of Hg content in topsoils trying to explain both the natural and the anthropogenic drivers.
This can be done taking into account 22,000 measured samples taken with LUCAS topsoil survey in Europe. More insights can be given by the recent work Ballabio et al 2019. A spatial assessment of mercury content in the European Union topsoil .
In this assessment, authors can consider the findings of the large EU study as this is the largest harmonised and recent measured Hg campaign:
- large proportion of atmospheric Hg that is bound to soil organic matter.
- In addition, the findings indicate that soil Hg is not only bound to organic matter but associated with iron oxide and clay minerals.
- Hg accumulation increases with pH, starting from a pH of 4 and reaching a maximum at a pH of 6.5..
- Parent material also increase Hg. Highest Hg content are found in mineralized regions characterized by subduction zones and volcanic deposits.
- High correlation with NDVI - dense vegetation (higher concentration in forests and grasslands compared to croplands).
- Elevated temperatures reduce activation energy required to release Hg from soil or vegetation and subsequently increase Hg volatilisation rates to the atmosphere- However, the outliers are explained by anthropogenic activities. 1% of the samples show very high Hg values due to proximity to mining sites. Particular high Hg values have been found close to Almaden (spain), Monte Amiata (Italy) and Idrija mine in Slovenia.
- Another source of Hg is represented by coal combustion in power plants in the European Union.
- Also, sampling points close to active or past Chrol-alkali plants have shown very high Hg values .Important to notice the impact of erosion and sediment removal to transfer Hg in aquatic systems (oceans, river-basins, lakes).
Future Projections for Hg in topsoils are mainly positive as the decrease of coal combustion and the better treatment in Chrol alkali plants have positive effects. In addition, specific control technologies and legal biding regulations (in the European Union, Soil Monitoring Law, Mercury Regulation) will have positive impact in reducing Hg concentrations.
Many thanks for taking those remarks into account.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-65-CC1 -
CEC1: 'Comment on gmd-2024-65', Juan Antonio Añel, 14 Jun 2024
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.htmlYou have archived your data in three repositories that does not comply with our trustable permanent archival policy. These include https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/, https://www.amap.no/mercury-emissions, and https://ftp.as.harvard.edu/. You must archive the data that you use for your manuscript in one of the repositories that we can accept according to our policy. Therefore, please publish your data in one of the appropriate repositories, and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and DOI) as soon as possible, as we can not accept manuscripts in Discussions that do not comply with our policy. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular.
Also, you must include in a potentially reviewed version of your manuscript the modified 'Data Availability' section, with the DOI of the data.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-65-CEC1 -
RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2024-65', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Jul 2024
reply
This paper presents the ambitious plan of the Multi-Compartment Hg Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP) for a multi-model ensemble approach to supporting the Minamata Convention as it seeks to assess the degree to which international efforts are achieving the convention’s goals of reducing Hg in the environment. Since anthropogenic emissions to the atmosphere that lead to transboundary air pollution are the subject of another international treaty, the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution consideration is given to those policy goals as well.
The scope of the task envisioned by the MCHgMAP is huge. The length and the depth of the paper is commensurate to that task. Despite the paper’s great length, and the complexity of the issues that it brings up, the paper has a clear structure that keeps the many parts of the paper from getting in the way of each other. The text is also commendably well-written, with just a few places where some clarification is needed. The survey of the literature is similarly well-done, building confidence that the knowledge base going into the modeling exercise draws on much of the relevant literature – even though that literature is developing rapidly – which is a reflection of how the understanding of Hg cycling continues to develop.
I have two major concerns, as well as some smaller points for the authors to consider.
The first of the major concerns regards the value of providing examples of similar efforts to use multi-model ensembles to support policy efforts. As a reader feeling overwhelmed by the scope of what is to be attempted, and trying to get a clearer vision of where the overall process presented in this paper is heading, it would be helpful to be given other examples where MME’s have been applied. (I presume the work of the IPCC has such examples.) So please try to present what is envisaged for supporting the Minamata Convention in relation to what has been achieved in modeling other global scale pollution issues to support the policy process.
My other suggestion concerns Section 8 where I am missing treatment of the Terrestrial-Hydrological modeling. Earlier in the paper, three classes of models are presented (Atmosphere, Ocean and Terrestrial-Hydrological models (Sections 2.1-2.3, and the “Contemporary Cycle” in Figure 1.). These all seem to have a place in the lower part of Fig 1, the “Long-Term Cycle” of “Multi-Media Mass Balance models”. But when one gets to “Section 8 Modeling analysis: process-understanding”, there are two sections, 8.1 on atmospheric models and 8.2 on ocean models. The issues addressed for these two classes of models would have been appropriate for Terrestrial-Hydrological Models as well. More generally, I find the presentation of the Terrestrial-Hydrological modeling as hard to understand fitting into the global scope of the MCHgMAP, since there are so many more potential compartments in the terrestrial-hydrological modeling domain compared to the ocean or atmosphere..
Below are more minor points for the authors to consider:
Line 1615. There will be perturbation modeling and sensitivity modeling. It seemed hard for me to understand the need to differentiate these, since the two seem so closely related.
I have a sense that a major challenge for global Hg modeling is the apparent discrepancy between increasing anthropogenic emission inventories during recent decades, and the regional decline in atmospheric Hg over Europe. If this is indeed the case in the eyes of the authors, it would be nice to see this lifted up as an example of the type of issue that the MCHgMAP will address.
In section 2.3, a number of terrestrial hydrological models are mentioned. I missed one published in Environmental Science and Technology that seems appropriate to include: Eklof, Karin, et al. "Parsimonious model for simulating total mercury and methylmercury in boreal streams based on riparian flow paths and seasonality." Environ. Sci. Technol. 49.13 (2015): 7851-7859.
Lines 1212-1218. Here the authors state that
“It is currently not possible to determine the origin (anthropogenic/geogenic) or period of origin of the primary emission of Hg that are currently being reemitted from the ocean based on traditional measurements of Hg concentrations (for an explanation on how the Hg(0) evasion flux is determined see Sect. 4.4 and Appendix B). However, both box and 3D models can be used to gain insights into the extent of the Hg(0) evasion flux from the ocean, the fraction that different sources or historic periods contribute, and how concentrations will change in response to changes in Hg ocean inputs as a result of measures under the Hg MEAs.”.
This would seem like great place to mention the use of Hg isotopes to resolve these issues as Jiskra et al. did in their 2021 Nature publication. That article is cited in the first paragraph of the papers introduction (line 75), and one other place, but not in relation to where it is most relevant, specifically in this section at line 1212-1218. I am also concerned that the power of isotopes is not going to be brought to bear in the MCHgMAP as fully as they could be. But I expect that is something that will have to be wrestled with when looking at the results of the MCHgMAP.In the reference list there are three references where the first author is Li, C. But there are actually two different people involved. So good that their names are distinguished…
Line 1506 begins a new paragraph. It was difficult to understand that this new paragraph had started taking about lake sediments. (The previous paragraph was about tree-rings).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-65-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
431 | 137 | 19 | 587 | 11 | 10 |
- HTML: 431
- PDF: 137
- XML: 19
- Total: 587
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1