the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Process-based modeling framework for sustainable irrigation management at the regional scale: Integrating rice production, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions
Abstract. Rice cultivation faces multiple challenges of rising food demand while increasing water scarcity and greenhouse gas emissions, intensifying the tension of the food-water-climate nexus. Process-based modeling of the nexus is pivotal for developing effective measures to address these challenges. However, current models struggle to simulate their complex relationships under different water management schemes, primarily due to inadequate representation of critical physiological effects and the absence of efficient spatially explicit modeling strategies. Here, we propose an advancing framework that addresses these problems by integrating a process-based soil-crop model with vital physiological effects, a novel method for model upscaling, and the NSGA-II multi-objective optimization algorithm at a parallel computing platform. Applying the framework accounted for 52 %, 60 %, 37 %, and 94 % of the experimentally observed variations in rice yield, irrigation water use, and methane and nitrous oxide emissions in response to irrigation schemes. Compared with the origin model using traditional parameter upscaling methods, the advancing framework significantly reduced simulation errors by 35 %−85 %. Moreover, it well reproduced the multivariable synergies and tradeoffs observed in China’s rice fields and identified additional 18 % areas feasible for irrigation optimization, along with an additional 11 % and 14 % reduction potentials of water use and methane emissions, without compromising production. Over 90 % of the potentials could be realized at the cost of 4 % less yield increase and 25 % higher nitrous oxide emissions under multiple objectives. Overall, this study provides a valuable tool for multi-objective optimization of rice irrigation schemes. The advancing framework also has implications for other process-based modelling improvements efforts.
- Preprint
(2424 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2256 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 02 Mar 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2024-212', Anonymous Referee #1, 31 Dec 2024
reply
General Comments
Simulating the complex relationships between water, crop yield, and greenhouse gases at a region scale based on process-based model is a challenge. To address this problem, this study proposes a novel framework that simulates regional rice yield, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions in response to various irrigation schemes. This framework integrates critical physiological processes, upscales model parameters, and employs multi-objective optimization. It has been carefully evaluated. Overall, the manuscript is well-structured and well-written. With a few enhancements, I believe this study would make a significant contribution to Geoscientific Model Development.
- The authors showed large spatial variabilities in regulation potentials while less explanations are provided. Understanding the driving factors behind these variations is essential for designing more targeted and effective irrigation schemes. A more detailed analysis of the spatial patterns and their underlying drivers would greatly benefit the readers' comprehension and application of the findings.
- Experimental observations are important for improving and calibrating the WHCNS model in this study. The authors also discussed uncertainties associated with observation availability. However, the current description lacks clarity regarding the geographical distribution and environmental context of these observations (Lines 198-228). Detailed information on the observation sites, including their locations and conditions, is crucial for identifying areas for further research and for situating the study's findings within a broader geographical context.
Specific Comments
- Line 126, please provide full name of NSGA-II and related references.
- Line 168-194, the model running requires a lot of input data for both site and regional simulations, including variables related to climate, soil and management practices. Although the authors have already provided such information in the Method section, a separate summary table are helpful for clearer view.
- Line 177, delete the spacing after the reference and please carefully check other formatting errors.
- Line 208-210, why only observations at the soil depth of 15-20 cm were included?
- Line 590, please provide full name and related references of the DNDC and DLEM model.
- Line 701-704, only national results of the tradeoffs or synergies relationships between different variables were stated. Please discuss more about their spatial heterogeneity.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-212-RC1 -
CEC1: 'No compliance with the policy of journal - action needed', Juan Antonio Añel, 23 Jan 2025
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript it has come to our attention that it does not comply with the "Code and Data policy" of our journal: https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
First, the code that you provide for the model that you use contains binary files: .exe. This is not code, and we can not accept it. You must provide the code of the model, not compiled files. Therefore, you must reply to this comment with a new repository (including its DOI and link) that contains the full code of the model. Moreover, I would like to not that the FigShare repository that you have shared contains many .xls files. This format is not a fully compliant ISO format, and depends on proprietary software to assure compatibility when accessing the files. Instead of this format, we encourage you to share this content in the OpenDocument format, for example, .ods files.
Also, you provide part of your data with a link to a site that does not comply with our policy, and it is not a valid repository for scientific publication. I refer here to the land data in bnu.edu.cn. Moreover, the link is pointing to a main portal, not the exact data that you have used in your study, that is what is necessary to replicate your work. Therefore, you must store the land data that you use in your work in one of the repositories that we can accept according to our policy, and reply to this comment with the information about it (link and DOI).
I should note that the current situation with your manuscript is irregular due to this failures to comply with our policy, and therefore should have not been accepted in Discussions. Therefore, we are asking you to address this situation as soon as possible, without waiting for the end of the Discussions period. In the meantime, we can not continue with the review process for your manuscript until the mentioned issues are solved. Please, note that if you fail to comply with this request, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-212-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Yan Bo, 24 Jan 2025
reply
Thank you for your comments on our manuscript. We apologize for the initial submission not fully complying with the journal's code and data policy. We have taken immediate steps to address the issues raised.
First, we supplement the full source code of the WHCNS model to the repository (https://figshare.com/s/139f3ad8a70faa99724d) (in the file named ‘source code of the WHCNS model’). In the repository, we converted all the .xls files into the OpenDocument format (.ods) to ensure compatibility and compliance with open standards. Note that .xls files are necessary for running the model, so we provide both .xls and corresponding OpenDocument (.ods) files in the repository.
Second, we provide the detailed link of the exact land database we use in the "Code and Data Availability" section of the manuscript (https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000293). We also provide our processed soil data for regional simulation in the repository to reproduce the results presented in the manuscript (named ‘China_soil’ in the file ‘Regional\input\’).
Last, we also provide detailed explanations in the ‘Readme’ document for each file in the repository.
In the revision, we ensure that all the necessary code and data are now accessible and properly documented. We revise the "Code and Data Availability" section of our manuscript to reflect these changes as below.
Line 792-802
“Code and data availability
The origin code of WHCNS model and required model input files are available at https://figshare.com/s/139f3ad8a70faa99724d. Spatial dataset of harvested area of irrigated rice is available from https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KAGRFI. Origin climate data is available from https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets/reanalysis-era5-single-levels?tab=download. Origin soil data is obtained from https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000293. Processed climate and soil data for running model are also provided in the figshare repository (see Readme for detailed explanations). Crop calendar data are available from https://zenodo.org/record/5062513. All other data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information.”
We appreciate your understanding and look forward to continuing the review process.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-212-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Yan Bo, 24 Jan 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
239 | 37 | 9 | 285 | 23 | 6 | 8 |
- HTML: 239
- PDF: 37
- XML: 9
- Total: 285
- Supplement: 23
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1