the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
DECIPHeR-GW v1: A coupled hydrological model with improved representation of surface-groundwater interactions
Abstract. Groundwater is a crucial part of the hydrologic cycle and the largest accessible freshwater source for humans and ecosystems. However, most hydrological models lack explicit representation of surface-groundwater interactions, leading to poor prediction performance in groundwater-dominated catchments. This study presents DECIPHeR-GW v1, a new surface-groundwater hydrological model that couples a Hydrological Response Units (HRU)-based hydrological model and a two-dimensional gridded groundwater model. By using a two-way coupling method, the groundwater model component receives recharge from HRUs, simulates surface-groundwater interactions, and returns groundwater levels and groundwater discharges to HRUs, where river routing is then performed. These interactions are happening at each time step in our new surface-groundwater model. Depending on the storage capacity of the surface water model component and the position of the modelled groundwater level, three scenarios are developed to derive recharge and capture surface-groundwater interactions dynamically. Our new coupled model was calibrated and evaluated against daily flow timeseries from 669 catchments and groundwater level data from 1804 wells across England and Wales. The model provides streamflow simulation with a median KGE of 0.83 across various catchment characteristics, with high performance particularly for the drier chalk catchments in southeast England, where the average KGE increased from 0.49 in the benchmark DECIPHeR model to 0.7. Furthermore, our model reproduces temporal patterns of the groundwater level timeseries, with more than half of the wells achieving a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.6 or higher when comparing simulations to observations. Overall, this new DECIPHeR-GW model demonstrates remarkable accuracy and computational efficiency in reproducing streamflow and groundwater levels, making it a valuable tool for addressing water resources and management issues over large domains.
- Preprint
(5357 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(8604 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 14 Jan 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2024-211', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Dec 2024
reply
Review comment: DECIPHeR-GW v1: A coupled hydrological model with improved representation of surface-groundwater interactions by Yanchen Zheng et al.
This manuscript by Yanchen Zheng et al. presents a new coupled hydrological model called DECIPHeR-GW v1, which has a specific focus on enhanced representation of surface-groundwater interactions. The model couples two previously published models: an HRU-based hydrological model (DECIPHeR, Coxon et al., 2019) and a 2D groundwater model (Rahman et al. 2023). The coupling results in feedbacks between receiving recharge, simulating surface-groundwater interactions and returning groundwater levels and – discharges, of which the latter is then again incorporated in the river routing of the HRU base model. These interactions are all based on three interaction scenarios: groundwater head below bottom of the root zone, groundwater head is within the root zone, and groundwater head is higher than the topography. The aim of this study was to develop a coupled version, that is computational efficient even at large scales and able to represent the surface-groundwater interactions with high skill.
The calibration and validation was done on 669 catchments and 1804 groundwater wells. While the calibration was solely focused on streamflow data as the objective, the groundwater observations were used to evaluate the internal dynamics of the coupled model. The coupled model improved the simulation results in groundwater-dominated catchments, however strongly human influenced catchments remain challenging. Overall, the coupled model seems to produce robust streamflow simulations thanks also due to the incorporation of the temporal dynamics of groundwater levels and outperforms the original DECIPHeR model in catchments with minor human influence.
The manuscript is well written and easy to follow, the additional extensive supplement provides the reader with even more information, where of interest.
Â
The following points, remarks and questions are mostly raised for further clarifications, no major comments:
Line 165 capital S for section 2.2 (or check to keep consistency)
Line 185 what buffer zone was defined for the demonstrated model?
Figure 3, description, capital S for section 4.2Â (or check to keep consistency)
Line 236 50m gridded elevation map mentioned to define HRUs, does this differ from the original DECIPHeR model? Or where there in general specific changes (besides the parameters listed in 3.4) done for this version of DECIPHeR(-GW) presented here compared to the original DECIPHeR model?
Line 243 Citation does not need to be in brackets I believe
Line 244 capital S for section 3.3 (or check to keep consistency)
Line 300-302 could there be a potential pitfall doing the calibration like that?
Line 325 what is the benchmark model?
Line 324 Citation does not need to be in brackets I believe
Line 325 was the national calibration done on top of the catchment calibration, or both separate and the parameter values saved for the specific use of the model (e.g. national vs catchment runs)?
Line 357 any educated guess what are the driving factors are in the model for the overestimated streamflow locations? Or how they could be changed to include for example the waste water discharges mentioned (or other human influences)?
Line 365 Would there also be an option to not use equal weights? E.g. including a sort of ratio weight for different catchment sizes included in the national calibration?
Line 405 is the KGE of 0.85 referring to the model that after the national calibration or the catchment only? And how would they differ (also in relation to the benchmark model)?
Line 410 could there be structural components that could be added that represent the human influences? (maybe more for a future study)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-211-RC1
Data sets
DECIPHeR-GW v1: A coupled hydrological model with improved representation of surface-groundwater interactions Yanchen Zheng https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/wt0r1ec81zti2tww4p64fsqr3
Model code and software
DECIPHeR-GW Yanchen Zheng https://zenodo.org/records/14113870
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
148 | 39 | 5 | 192 | 46 | 3 | 1 |
- HTML: 148
- PDF: 39
- XML: 5
- Total: 192
- Supplement: 46
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 1
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1