Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-200
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-200
Submitted as: development and technical paper
 | 
04 Dec 2024
Submitted as: development and technical paper |  | 04 Dec 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal GMD.

SICNetseason V1.0: a transformer-based deep learning model for seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction by integrating sea ice thickness data

Yibin Ren, Xiaofeng Li, and Yunhe Wang

Abstract. The Arctic sea ice is suffering dramatic retreating in summer and fall, which has far-reaching consequences on the global climate and commercial activities. Accurate seasonal sea ice predictions are significant in inferring climate change and planning commercial activities. However, seasonally predicting the summer sea ice encounters a significant obstacle known as the spring predictability barrier (SPB): predictions made later than May demonstrate good skill in predicting summer sea ice, while predictions made on or earlier than May exhibit considerably lower skill. This study develops a transformer-based deep-learning model, SICNetseason (V1.0), to predict the Arctic sea ice concentration on a seasonal scale. Including spring sea ice thickness (SIT) data in the model significantly improves the prediction skill at the SPB point. A 20-year (2000–2019) testing demonstrates that the detrended anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) of Sep. sea ice extent (sea ice concentration > 15 %) predicted by our model at May/Apr. is improved by 7.7 %/10.61 % over the ACC predicted by the state-of-the-art dynamic model from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Compared with the anomaly persistence benchmark, the mentioned improvement is 41.02 %/36.33 %. Our deep learning model significantly reduces prediction errors of Sep.'s sea ice concentration on seasonal scales compared to ECMWF and Persistence. The spring SIT data is key in optimizing the SPB, contributing to a more than 20 % ACC enhancement in Sep.'s SIE at four to five months lead predictions. Our model achieves good generalization in predicting the Sep. SIE of 2020–2023.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Yibin Ren, Xiaofeng Li, and Yunhe Wang

Status: open (until 29 Jan 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Yibin Ren, Xiaofeng Li, and Yunhe Wang
Yibin Ren, Xiaofeng Li, and Yunhe Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 93 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
77 13 3 93 0 0
  • HTML: 77
  • PDF: 13
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 93
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Dec 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Dec 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 93 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 93 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
This study developed a deep learning model to predict the Arctic sea ice seasonally. By integrating the sea ice thickness data into the model, the spring prediction barrier of Arctic sea ice is optimized significantly. The model achieves better prediction skills than the typical numerical model in predicting September’s sea ice concentration seasonally. The sea ice thickness data plays a key role in reducing the prediction errors of the Beaufort Sea, the East Siberian Sea, and the Laptev Sea.