Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-114
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-114
Submitted as: model evaluation paper
 | 
23 Jul 2024
Submitted as: model evaluation paper |  | 23 Jul 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal GMD.

Evaluation of Dust Emission and Land Surface Schemes in Predicting a Mega Asian Dust Storm over South Korea Using WRF-Chem (v4.3.3)

Ji Won Yoon, Seungyeon Lee, Ebony Lee, and Seon Ki Park

Abstract. This study evaluates the performance of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) in forecasting a mega Asian Dust Storm (ADS) event that occurred over South Korea on March 28–29, 2021. We specifically evaluated a combination of five dust emission schemes and four land surface schemes, which are crucial for predicting ADSs. Using in-situ and remote sensing data, we assessed surface meteorological and air quality variables, including 2 m temperature, 2 m relative humidity, 10 m wind speed, particulate matter 10 (PM10), and aerosol optical depth (AOD) over South Korea. Our results indicate that prediction of surface meteorological variables is more influenced by the land surface scheme than by the dust emission scheme—generally showing good performance when dust emission schemes are combined with the Noah land surface model with Multiple Parameterization options (Noah-MP). In contrast, prediction of air quality variables, including PM10 and AOD, is strongly affected by the dust emission schemes, which is directly related to the generation and amount of dust through interaction with surface properties. Among the total of 20 available scheme combinations, the University of Cologne 2004 combined with the Community Land Model version 4.0 (UoC04-CLM4) showed the best performance, closely followed by the University of Cologne 2001 combined with CLM4 (UoC01-CLM4). UoC04-CLM4 outperformed the other scheme combinations by reducing the root mean square errors of PM10 up to 29.6 %. However, both UoC04-CLM4 and UoC01-CLM4 simulated values closest to the MODIS AOD but tended to overestimate the AOD in some regions during the origination and transportation processes. In contrast, other scheme combinations significantly underestimated the AOD throughout the entire simulation process of ADSs.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Ji Won Yoon, Seungyeon Lee, Ebony Lee, and Seon Ki Park

Status: open (until 17 Sep 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ji Won Yoon, Seungyeon Lee, Ebony Lee, and Seon Ki Park

Data sets

Various Datasets for Evaluation Ji Won Yoon https://zenodo.org/records/11649488

Model code and software

Model Code (WRF v4.3.3) Ji Won Yoon https://zenodo.org/records/11649488

Ji Won Yoon, Seungyeon Lee, Ebony Lee, and Seon Ki Park

Viewed

Total article views: 60 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
51 5 4 60 5 2 3
  • HTML: 51
  • PDF: 5
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 60
  • Supplement: 5
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jul 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jul 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 73 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 73 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates the WRF-Chem model's prediction of a mega Asian Dust Storms (ADSs) over South Korea on March 28–29, 2021. We assessed five dust emission and four land surface schemes for predicting ADSs. Using surface observations and remote sensing data, we examined variables, such as temperature, humidity, wind speed, PM10, and aerosol optical depth. The UoC04 dust emission and CLM4 land surface scheme combination reduced RMSE for PM10 by up to 29.6 %, showing the best performance.