Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-76
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-76
Submitted as: model evaluation paper
 | 
13 Jul 2023
Submitted as: model evaluation paper |  | 13 Jul 2023
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal GMD.

Calibration of Absorbing Boundary Layers for Geoacoustic Wave Modeling in Pseudo-Spectral Time-Domain Methods

Carlos Spa, Oilio Rojas, and Josep de la Puente

Abstract. This paper develops a calibration methodology of the artificial absorbing techniques typically used by Fourier pseudo-spectral time-domain (PSTD) methods for geoacoustic wave simulations. Specifically, we consider the damped wave equation (DWE) that results from adding a dissipation term to the original wave equation, the sponge boundary layers (SBL) that apply an exponentially decaying factor directly to the wavefields, and finally, a classical split formulation of the Perfectly Matched Layers (PML). These three techniques belong to the same family of absorbing boundary layers (ABL), where outgoing waves and edge reflections are progressively damped across a grid zone of NABL consecutive layers. The ABLs used are compatible with a pure Fourier formulation of PSTD. We first characterize the three ABL with respect to multiple sets of NABL and their respective absorption parameter for homogeneous media. Next, we validate our findings in heterogeneous media of increasing complexity, starting with a layered medium and finishing with the SEG/EAGE 3-D Salt model. Finally, we algorithmically compare the three PSTD-ABL methods in terms of memory demands and computational cost. An interesting result is that PML, despite outperforming the absorption of the other two ABLs for a given NABL value, requires approximately double the computational time. The parameter configurations reported in this article, can be readily used for PSTD simulations in other test cases, and the ABL calibration methodology may be applied to other wave propagation schemes.

Carlos Spa et al.

Status: open (extended)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2023-76', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Aug 2023 reply
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Carlos Spa, 27 Aug 2023 reply
      • AC2: 'Reply on AC1', Carlos Spa, 27 Aug 2023 reply
  • EC1: 'Comment on gmd-2023-76', James Kelly, 05 Sep 2023 reply
    • AC3: 'Reply on EC1', Carlos Spa, 15 Sep 2023 reply
    • AC4: 'Reply on EC1', Carlos Spa, 15 Sep 2023 reply
    • AC5: 'Reply on EC1', Carlos Spa, 16 Sep 2023 reply

Carlos Spa et al.

Carlos Spa et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 323 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
207 52 64 323 3 4
  • HTML: 207
  • PDF: 52
  • XML: 64
  • Total: 323
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 302 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 302 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Sep 2023
Download
Short summary
This paper develops a calibration methodology of all absorbing techniques typically used by Fourier pseudo-spectral time-domain (PSTD) methods for geoacoustic wave simulations. The main contributions of the paper are: - An implementation and quantitative comparison of all absorbing techniques available for PSTD methods through a simple and robust numerical experiment. - A validation of these absorbing techniques in several 3-D seismic scenarios with gradual heterogeneity complexities.