Submitted as: model evaluation paper
28 Jul 2023
Submitted as: model evaluation paper |  | 28 Jul 2023
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal GMD.

Assessment of Climate Biases in OpenIFS Version 43R3 across Model Horizontal Resolutions and Time Steps

Abhishek Savita, Joakim Kjellsson, Robin Pilch Kedzierski, Mojib Latif, Tabea Rahm, Sebastian Wahl, and Wonsun Park

Abstract. We examine the impact of horizontal resolution and model time step on climate of the OpenIFS version 43R3 atmosphere general circulation model. A series of simulations for the period 1979–2019 are conducted with various horizontal resolutions (i.e., ~100, ~50, and ~25 km) while maintaining the same time step (i.e., 15 minutes) and using different time steps (i.e., 60, 30 and 15 minutes) at 100 km horizontal resolution. We find that the surface zonal wind bias reduces significantly over certain regions such as the Southern Ocean, the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes, and in tropical and subtropical regions at high horizontal resolution (i.e., ~25 km). Similar improvement is evident too when using a coarse resolution model (~100 km) with a smaller time step (i.e., 30 and 15 minutes). We also find improvements in Rossby wave amplitude and phase speed as well as weather regime patterns when a smaller time step or higher horizontal resolution is used. The improvement in the wind bias when using the shorter time step is mostly due to an increase in shallow and mid-level convection that enhances vertical mixing in the lower troposphere. The enhanced mixing allows frictional effects to influence a deeper layer and reduces wind and wind speed throughout the troposphere. However, precipitation biases generally increase with higher horizontal resolution or smaller time step, whereas the surface-air temperature bias exhibits a small improvement over North America and the Eastern Eurasian continent. We argue that the bias improvement in the highest horizontal resolution (i.e., ~25 km) configuration benefits from a combination of both the enhanced horizontal resolution and the shorter time step. In summary, we demonstrate that by reducing the time step in the OpenIFS model, one can alleviate some climate biases at a lower cost than by increasing the horizontal resolution.

Abhishek Savita et al.

Status: open (until 04 Oct 2023)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2023-101', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Oct 2023 reply

Abhishek Savita et al.

Abhishek Savita et al.


Total article views: 371 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
306 60 5 371 6 2
  • HTML: 306
  • PDF: 60
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 371
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jul 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jul 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 352 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 352 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
Latest update: 03 Oct 2023
Short summary
The OpenIFS model is used to examine the impact of horizontal resolutions (HR) and model time steps. We find that the surface wind biases over the oceans, in particular the Southern Ocean, are sensitive to both model time step and HR, with the HR model having the smallest biases. When using a coarse resolution model with a shorter time step, a similar improvement is also found. The climate biases can be reduced in OpenIFS model at a cheaper cost by reducing the time step than increasing the HR.