Gulf Stream and interior western boundary volume transport as key regions to constrain the future North Atlantic Carbon Uptake
- 1NORCE Norwegian Research Centre and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway
- 2NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway
Abstract. As one of the major carbon sinks in the global ocean, the North Atlantic is a key player in mediating the ongoing global warming. However, projections of the North Atlantic carbon sink in a high-CO2 future are highly uncertain due to greatly varying model results. A previous study analysed an ensemble of 11 CMIP5-models and identified two indicators of contemporary model behavior that are highly correlated with a model´s projected future carbon-uptake in the North Atlantic: (i) the high latitude winter pCO2sea-anomaly, which is tightly linked to winter mixing and nutrient supply and (ii) the fraction of the anthropogenically altered carbon-inventory stored below 1000 m depth, indicating the efficiency of dissolved inorganic carbon transport into and within the deep ocean. Both relationships build so-called emergent constraints, where observed contemporary indicators can be used to improve future North Atlantic carbon sink estimates.
In this study, we apply a genetic algorithm to optimize these emergent relationships by constraining the spatial extent of the indicators, i.e. to identify key regions that maximise the cross-correlations between the indicators and the future carbon uptake. We pre-define the shape of the desired regions as (i) rectangles and ellipses of different sizes for the first surface-2D indicator and (ii) cuboids and ellipsoids of different volumes for the second water column-3D indicator. Independent on shape and size, the genetic algorithm persistently identifies the Gulf Stream region as optimal for the first indicator as well as the pathway of the broad interior southward volume transport for the second indicator. This is further confirmed with high correlations between the North Atlantic future carbon uptake and volume transport values extracted for the central latitudes and depths of these optimal regions. Though the importance of volume transport for the carbon uptake is well known, our results go beyond traditional knowledge and identify which depth-ranges and latitudes of this volume transport are consistently of importance across the multi-model ensemble. Our study shows that regional optimisations of emergent constraint can isolate key drivers responsible for multi-model spread and furthermore provide information on where observations are most crucial to constrain future projections. Moreover, a comparison of the model performance in the identified key regions and the large-scale North Atlantic indicates that models whose mean values are in good agreement with observations within one key area do not necessarily perform well when looking at another key area. This hampers the applicability of emergent constraints and highlights the need to additionally evaluate spatial model features.
Nadine Goris et al.
Status: final response (author comments only)
CEC1: 'Comment on gmd-2022-152', Juan Antonio Añel, 16 Jun 2022
- AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Nadine Goris, 25 Aug 2022
- AC2: 'Second Reply on CEC1', Nadine Goris, 31 Aug 2022
RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2022-152', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Jul 2022
- AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Nadine Goris, 30 Sep 2022
- AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Nadine Goris, 30 Sep 2022
RC2: 'Comment on gmd-2022-152', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Jul 2022
- AC5: 'Reply on RC2', Nadine Goris, 30 Sep 2022
Nadine Goris et al.
Nadine Goris et al.
Viewed (geographical distribution)
After checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
You have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other long-term archival and publishing alternatives, such as Zenodo. Therefore, please, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories, and include the relevant primary input/output data. Similarly, we do not accept embargoes such as registration, previous contact with the authors or upon request statements. All the necessary input and configuration files must be made available with the paper through one of the repositories we accept.
For the storage of the observation files, we can not accept the servers noaa.gov and rapid.ac.uk. These are not trustable long-term archives that provide a DOI for the specific data files used in your work. Therefore, instead of pointing in a generic way to them, you must publish the specific files used in your work in one of the repositories listed in our policy.
Also, I have not seen a license listed in the GitHub repository of your code. If you do not include a license, the code continues to be your property and can not be used by others, despite any statement on being free to use. Therefore, when uploading the model's code to the new repository, you could want to choose a free software/open-source (FLOSS) license. We recommend the GPLv3. You only need to include the file 'https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt' as LICENSE.txt with your code. Also, you can choose other options that Zenodo provides: GPLv2, Apache License, MIT License, etc.
Please reply as soon as possible to this comment with the link to the new repository (or repositories) for it so that it is available for peer-review, as it should be.
Be aware that failing to comply with this request could result in the rejection of your manuscript for publication.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Exec. Editor