<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" specific-use="SMUR" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMDD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMDD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1991-962X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name></publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-2022-138</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Assessment of tropospheric ozone products from CAMS reanalysis and near-real time analysis using observations over Iran</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kaffashzadeh</surname>
<given-names>Najmeh</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5835-9604</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aliakbari Bidokhti</surname>
<given-names>Abbas Ali</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>20</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2022</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>20</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2022 Najmeh Kaffashzadeh</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/preprints/gmd-2022-138/">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/preprints/gmd-2022-138/</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/preprints/gmd-2022-138/gmd-2022-138.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/preprints/gmd-2022-138/gmd-2022-138.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>&lt;p&gt;Tropospheric ozone time series consists of the effects of various scales of motion, from meso to large time scales which is often challenging for global models to capture them. This study uses two global datasets, namely reanalysis and analysis of the Copernicus atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS), to assess the capability of these models or systems in presenting ozone&amp;rsquo;s features in small scales. We employ the tropospheric ozone product of the models and in situ measurements at 18 stations over Iran for the year of 2020. Furthermore, we make use of data of ozone, temperature, nitrogen oxides, wind speed, and wind direction at one more station. We decompose the datasets into three spectral components, i.e., short (S), medium (M), and long (L) term. We only evaluate the S and M terms of modelled against those of observed datasets for all stations. We examine the relationship between ozone and the relevant proxies. Results show a correlation coefficient of larger than 0.5 for S and about 0.25 for M term in both models. It turns out that the reanalysis dataset demonstrates more precision for the S component than that for the M. Both models can show the observed correlation between ozone and temperature, whereas some inconsistencies appear in presenting the anti-correlation between ozone and nitrogen oxides.&lt;/p&gt;</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="20"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>