<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-9-1455-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>A stochastic, Lagrangian model of sinking biogenic aggregates in the ocean (SLAMS 1.0): model formulation, validation and sensitivity</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Sinking aggregates}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T.~Jokulsdottir and D.~Archer}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jokulsdottir</surname><given-names>Tinna</given-names></name>
          <email>tinnsi@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Archer</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-7912</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago,
Chicago, IL 60637, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Tinna Jokulsdottir (tinnsi@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>1455</fpage><lpage>1476</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>We present a new mechanistic model, stochastic, Lagrangian aggregate model of sinking particles (SLAMS) for the biological pump in the ocean, which tracks
the evolution of individual particles as they aggregate, disaggregate, sink,
and are altered by chemical and biological processes. SLAMS considers the
impacts of ballasting by mineral phases, binding of aggregates by transparent exopolymer particles (TEP), zooplankton grazing and the fractal geometry
(porosity) of the aggregates. Parameterizations for age-dependent organic carbon (orgC) degradation kinetics, and disaggregation driven by zooplankton
grazing and TEP degradation, are motivated by observed particle fluxes and
size spectra throughout the water column. The model is able to explain
observed variations in orgC export efficiency and rain ratio from the
euphotic zone and to the sea floor as driven by sea surface temperature and
the primary production rate and seasonality of primary production. The model
provides a new mechanistic framework with which to predict future changes on
the flux attenuation of orgC in response to climate change forcing.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Plankton in the ocean incorporate dissolved carbon and nutrients into
particulate form (cells, marine snow and fecal pellets), which allows the
constituents to sink through the water column until the particles decompose
at depth. This process, called the biological pump <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.1"/>, results in a major rearrangement of the chemistry of the
oceans. The CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the atmosphere is coupled with the
chemistry of the surface ocean, giving the biological pump a hand in
controlling atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the climate of the Earth
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx71" id="paren.2"/>. One major uncertainty in future climate
change projections is the response of the biological pump in the ocean to
surface ocean conditions (thermal and chemical) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.3"/>.
Here we develop a new numerical model, stochastic, Lagrangian aggregate model of sinking particles (SLAMS), to simulate the processes and
characteristics of sinking particles in the ocean, to gain a better
understanding of what factors affect the flux of organic carbon (orgC), and how it might
respond to changing upper ocean chemistry and climate.</p>
      <p>Particles in the ocean span about 5 orders of magnitude in size and 15 orders
of magnitude in number density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="paren.4"/>. The slope of the
particle-size spectrum is highly variable <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.5"/>. Measurements
have shown that the majority of the flux is composed of slow
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and fast (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) sinking particles
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.6"/>.</p>
      <p>Flux attenuation of sinking organic particles is determined by the sinking
velocity of particles and the rate of orgC respiration. Sinking velocity
generally increases with particle size and density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx97" id="paren.7"/> and it has also been found to increase with depth, driven by
evolution of particle size or density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.8"/>. Normalized
Particulate organic carbon (POC)
flux to mass flux shows that orgC comprises about 5 % of the mass flux in
the deep ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.9"/>. The near constancy of this ratio
suggests that ballasting by minerals plays a key role in determining the orgC
sinking flux <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.10"/>. On the other hand,
minerals are not inherently sticky, and an overabundance of mineral particles
relative to transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in laboratory experiments
has been found to decrease the sizes of the aggregates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.11"/>
and sinking velocity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="paren.12"/>, which could act to diminish the
sinking flux.</p>
      <p>Biologically and chemically driven processes act on particles to change their
physical and chemical structure. The respiration of organic matter by
bacteria is a complex, sequential process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.13"/>, as indicated
by an observed correlation between the degradation rate of orgC and its age,
spanning 8 orders of magnitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.14"/>. Association
with mineral surfaces also acts to protect orgC from enzymatic degradation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.15"/>. Three mechanisms take place in zooplankton
guts: respiration of orgC, dissolution of calcium carbonate and repackaging
of phytoplankton cells into fecal pellets. Fecal pellets that are packaged
more tightly than aggregated marine snow have a potential to sink quickly
through the water column. Aggregate fragmentation is driven by zooplankton
swimming and feeding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.16"/> and the bacterial breakdown of
TEP, which leaves aggregates un-sticky and prone to break up
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.17"/>. In addition to biological dissolution of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
zooplankton guts, there appears to be significant dissolution of the more
soluble CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral aragonite in the water column <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.18"/>.
Biogenic silica, the other main biomineral in the ocean, is undersaturated
throughout the ocean, and is distinguished by a strong temperature
sensitivity of its dissolution rate, dissolving significantly faster in warm
waters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.19"/>.</p>
      <p>A common approach to modeling the flux of material through the water column
in large-scale ocean models is using the Martin curve <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.20"/>,
which predicts the orgC flux to depths from the export, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and an
attenuation parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Its simple form makes it well suited for large models where computational
economy is important, such as Ocean Carbon-cycle Model Intercomparison
Project – phase II (OCMIP-II) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="paren.21"/>. The difficulty lies in
understanding how <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varies regionally and temporally <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.22"/>. The model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.23"/> accounts for the ballast
effect, that minerals affect the orgC flux by protecting it from degradation
or increasing its sinking velocity, by modeling two classes of orgC: one that
is associated with ballast minerals and one that is not. Community Climate
System Model-ocean Biogeochemical Elemental Cycle (CCSM-BEC) expands on the
ballast model to simulate particle fluxes and accounts for temperature and
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to calculate remineralization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.24"/>. To simulate aerosol
size distribution dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.25"/> developed a method to solve
the Smoluchowski equation they call the sectional method.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.26"/> applied the sectional method to marine particles and
modeled an algal bloom using 22 size classes to simulate the evolution of the
particle-size spectrum of marine aggregates as they coagulate by Brownian
motion, shear and differential settling. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.27"/> expanded this
method to study how biological factors and changes in the particle-size
spectrum can modify the POC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Th ratio. The sectional method is also
utilized in a model of the particle flux in the twilight zone also including
settling, microbial activity, zooplankton feeding and fragmentation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx114" id="paren.28"/>. Particle-oriented models have found that POC flux is
sensitive to aggregation and zooplankton activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx114 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.29"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Attributes of a particle that are kept track of by the aggregate class. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Attribute</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Symbol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Units</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Notes and equations</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Identification number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">id</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">used when listing particles according to depth</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Water column or bottom</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Boolean variable to distinguish between particle</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">in the water column and at sea floor</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aggregate or fecal pellet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">af</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Boolean variable to distinguish between aggregate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">and fecal pellet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scaling factor</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">number of real aggregates represented by the</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">super aggregate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Primary particles</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">number of primary particles in a real particle</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Primary particle radius</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mroot><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mroot><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>mw</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fractal dimension</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aggregate radius aggregate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Porosity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Density of aggregate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sw</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>mw</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stickiness</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TEP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sinking velocity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">cm s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sw</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sw</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Organic carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mol C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 types (ages) of organic carbon</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Transparent exopolymer particles</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TEP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mol C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 types (ages) of TEP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Minerals</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>mrl</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">calcite, aragonite, bSi and lithogenic material</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>age</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>age</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>age</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mtext>TEP</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>age</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calcite, aragonite, bSi,
dust.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>We have developed a model, SLAMS, that simulates the flux of orgC and
minerals through the water column from the sea surface where production of
particles takes place to the seafloor at 4 km depth. We consider two types
of particle formation: aggregation of particles (also called marine snow) and
grazing and packaging by zooplankton producing fecal pellets. To tune ad hoc
parameters, we start with average ocean conditions: SST <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
PP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 700 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, bloom index (BI) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 and mixed layer depth (MLD) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m, and compare model orgC flux to sediment trap
data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.30"/>. To see how well the model predicts biogenic
flux, we put in respective surface conditions for 11 regions and compare
model results to observed orgC flux in the deep, pe-ratio (the fraction of
produced organic carbon that is exported) and the rain ratio
(orgC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the seafloor. We are interested in understanding the
effects of changing a climatic parameter on the attenuation of the orgC flux.
Our model differs from past models in that it has a large stochastic
component and the particles are Lagrangian, simulated using a modified
super-particle method described in the next section. The advantage gained by
the Lagrangian approach is that we can track a large number of aggregate
compositions (orgC and minerals) while also dynamically resolving the
particle-size spectrum. The goal of this study is to formulate a numerical
model intended to simulate these physio-biochemical dynamics. We are not
looking to come up with a model to couple to large-scale ocean circulation
models but to see if we can piece known mechanisms together and predict
fluxes observed in the ocean. Applications for such a model are to tweak
parameters and mechanisms to see how the flux responds to environmental
conditions to better understand the biological carbon pump. It might also be
suitable to develop a parameterization of how the flux responds to external
changes in the ecology and environment. Finally, we look at the sensitivity
of the model to sea surface temperatures (SSTs), primary production (PP) and
a BI, which is a measure of seasonality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Model description</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Aggregate classes</title>
      <p>The constitutive elements of SLAMS are the aggregates. They are clusters of
primary particles, a combination of phytoplankton cells
(coccolithophorids, diatoms, picoplankton), TEP particles and terrigenous
dust particles. SLAMS keeps track of a large number of aggregates that we
call aggregate classes (ACs). Each AC carries a suite of information about the
state of one class of aggregate in the water column
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). ACs, also called super-particles or
super-droplets in atmospheric applications, are representative of some
variable number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, of identical aggregates (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1"/>). Each
aggregate is composed of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> primary particles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>),
forming an aggregate consisting of up to 10 types of orgC (representing
different ages), up to 10 types of TEP (also representing different ages)
and four types of minerals (calcite, aragonite, biogenic silica and
terrigenous material). Lability of orgC and TEP is determined from its age.
From this information, SLAMS constructs the physical characteristics of the
aggregate that determine its sinking velocity.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>A schematic of an AC. The complete list of attributes is in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. The AC in this example represents 1000 aggregates
each composed of 28 primary particles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The probability, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for a type of particle to be produced and
range of values compared to a random number to determine the type produced,
the amount of material in each particle [pmol particle<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>], <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
number of particles produced each time. Radius, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m], density,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]. (Particle types: C is coccolithophorid, A is Aragonite
forming phytoplankton, D is diatom, Pi is picoplankton, D <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> dust.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">orgC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Calcite</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Arag.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">bSi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Clay</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.04–0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06–0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>9.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3–0.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.99–1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Production</title>
      <p>In all, 20 new ACs are created per 8 h time step and added to the list of existing
ACs. This number is a trade-off between computation time and smoothness of
the runs – 20 per time step turned out to be more than enough ACs to provide
consistent results between runs and an acceptable run time. The type of
phytoplankton (or terrigenous material) of each new particle is chosen by a
Monte Carlo method, wherein a uniformly distributed random number <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is generated and compared with ranges in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> (in
this paper all random numbers are uniformly distributed on [0,1]).
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> shows the default functional group in SLAMS that is a
typical open-ocean ensemble and would require modification with information
on specific functional types and rates of particle production for detailed
regional applications. When an AC is produced, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, meaning that the AC
represents many copies of a single cell (primary particle) that has not
aggregated. For example, if primary production is
1000 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, each AC (unless it is terrigenous material)
initially contains <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>16.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg C or 1.39 mmol C. The
amount of orgC per phytoplankton cell determines the number of primary
particles (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) that the AC will initially represent (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>).
For example, a coccolithophorid in our model contains 7 pmol orgC. If the
random number generated indicates production of coccolithophorids, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coccolithophorids.
The default functional groups (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>) are used for all
regions, except the Southern Ocean where calcifiers produce half as much
calcium carbonate and diatoms produce twice as much biogenic silica as in the
rest of the simulations.</p>
      <p>The depth, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, of a new particle is determined by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a random number and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is in [cm]. Half the production thus
takes place in the top 8.2 m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Bloom index</title>
      <p>Blooms are a condition of elevated phytoplankton concentration, possibly a
result of complex predator–pray imbalance, and have confounded scientists for
decades <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.31"/>. Blooming diatoms have been found to have a
lower transfer efficiency than a more carbonate dominated non-blooming flux,
suggesting that compositional differences of aggregates and aggregate
structure is important for understanding the controls on the organic carbon
flux <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.32"/>. Uncertainty in how spring blooms respond to changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and temperature are still unresolved <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.33"/>. In SLAMS,
the BI describes the degree to which production is
characterized by blooms:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>productive</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>days</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where BI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 represents constant production throughout the year and
BI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 means that the annual production all takes place in a quarter
of a year. It does not take into effect differences in ecology or physiology
of the plankton that may be dominant in blooms vs. not in blooms. Continuing
with the example above where PP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 mg C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, if
BI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5, then PP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the first half
of the year and 0 for the second half of the year. Each AC produced in the first
half of the year would contain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2000</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>33.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg C or
2.78 mmol C. Furthermore, if coccolithophorids are produced, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.96</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. No new ACs are produced during
the second half of the year.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Stickiness and TEP</title>
      <p>The kinetics of particle aggregation depend on the encounter rate and the
probability of sticking:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>stickiness</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>interparticle attachment rate</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>interparticle collision rate</mml:mtext></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.34"/>. The main glue that holds marine snow together in the
water column appears to be TEP, a
mucus-like polysaccharide material exuded by phytoplankton and bacteria,
especially under conditions of nutrient limitation during the senescent phase
of phytoplankton blooms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.35"/>. It is exuded in dissolved form but it separates into suspended
droplets, or gel, in conditions of turbulence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117" id="paren.36"/>. In SLAMS,
TEP production consists of 6 % of the primary production in the default
case, in terms of carbon. This number comes from sensitivity studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.37"/> where we simulate equatorial Pacific conditions
(SST, PP and seasonality) and compare orgC flux to the deep ocean to sediment
trap data. In the model formulation, TEP is not part of primary production but
an independent variable that can be changed without altering primary
production, allowing for sensitivity analysis of TEP. In each time step, 20 new
ACs are produced that are phytoplankton or terrigenous material, and 1 new AC
that is TEP. In the example above, 6 % of primary production
(1000 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is 60 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. One TEP
particle contains 1 pmol carbon and so <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The role of TEP in
controlling the flux of organic matter is complicated however by its low
density (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which acts to decrease the overall
density of an aggregate, potentially to the point where it becomes buoyant
and ascends rather than sinks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.38"/>. In SLAMS, particles rich in
TEP can be less dense than sea water resulting in upward movement. Occasional
accumulation of TEP-rich aggregates at the sea surface prompted us to
consider what happens to buoyant particles at the sea surface and include
wind-driven surface mixing in the model.</p>
      <p>As described above, much of the stickiness of aggregates appears to be due to
TEP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx117" id="paren.39"/>. Our formulation for
particle stickiness is simple: TEP particles have <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at the
time of production the stickiness of all other particles is 0. After a
particle aggregates, its stickiness is the volume-weighted average of the
stickiness of the component particles:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TEP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TEP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of TEP in the aggregate and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the volume of the entire aggregate. As a result, in SLAMS, particles do
not stick unless TEP is present.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Aggregation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1">
  <title>Rate of aggregation</title>
      <p>The rate of particle aggregation is governed by two limiting mechanisms: the
rate of collision (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (see discussion in, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx23" id="altparen.40"/>) and the rate of sticking (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) once collided.
Particles collide by three mechanisms; very small particles mostly encounter
each other by Brownian motion, whereas large particles meet most of their
partners due to fluid shear and differential settling (i.e., the larger
particles settle faster sweeping
up the smaller ones). In SLAMS, the coagulation kernel <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a sum of
three mechanisms: collision frequency due to Brownian motion:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Br</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            shear:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sh</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.8</mml:mn><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MIN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MAX</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            and differential settling:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ds</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MIN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.41"/>. Here <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Stefan–Boltzman constant, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is dynamic viscosity, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is kinematic viscosity and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
turbulent dissipation rate set to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
radii of the two aggregates being evaluated for collision and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are the settling velocities of the two aggregates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2">
  <title>Model formulation of aggregation</title>
      <p>In the real world, in a given amount of time, some fraction of the particles
represented by an AC in our scheme might aggregate with a particular other
class of particles and others not. In order to prevent an unmanageable
proliferation of particle types, we require that either all of the
less-numerous particles find partners in a given time step, or none of them
do. The decision is made stochastically using a Monte Carlo method. The idea
is that over many possible aggregations, the overall behavior will be
statistically similar to a real-world case, or a sectional model, where only
a fraction of the particles would aggregate in any given time step. If
instead we would allow for a fraction of the aggregates in an AC to aggregate and
not all of them, then a new AC would have to be made for every successful
aggregation adding hundreds of new ACs each time step. The main advantage of a
stochastic over a deterministic approach to aggregation simulation is that
here we are able to simulate a large number of compositions without altering
the run time.</p>
      <p>The number (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of ACs in a depth bin is variable, depending on
aggregation and sinking rate. After the first time step, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the top
depth bin and after the second time step <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> unless one or more AC sank
out. After the model has reached steady state, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a few hundred or a
few thousand, depending on the depth and conditions. Each time step, within
each depth bin, we pick <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pairs of ACs uniformly at random for
potential aggregation. For a given pair, we denote the indices of the ACs by
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), such that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., the number of aggregates in AC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
equal or smaller than the number of aggregates in AC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For each such pair
of aggregates, we compute the probability of aggregation between a single <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
aggregate and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> type aggregates as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the stickiness parameter and
coagulation kernel, respectively. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) represents a
continuous time model. In SLAMS we approximate Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) by
discretizing in time. As a result, for a given encounter where one of the
aggregates is extremely large, it is possible that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We take a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as an indication that the time step <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been chosen
to be too large for the approximation to be reasonable hence reducing
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is appropriate. In that case, for the given encounter, the time
step is decreased by factors of 10 until <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>We derive the expected number of aggregation events between all of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> aggregates given by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: assuming there are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particles and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particle and that the probability of aggregation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
constant, the expected number of aggregations in time step <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of aggregations the one <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particle experiences.
For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we find the expected number of aggregations that the second <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
particle undergoes, conditional on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of aggregations the second <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particle
experiences. The total number of aggregations that take place between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particles for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E13"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            and so the total number of aggregations when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E15"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              By induction, we obtain the following general formula for the expected number
of aggregations when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The mean number of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particles that aggregate with a given <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> particle is
therefore

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Assuming independence of particles, the variance is

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>An example of two aggregate classes sticking. Top left shows ACs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> before coagulation
takes place. Top right a schematic of the aggregates the AC represent. Bottom
three rows shows ACs if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2 or 3. Note that the total number of
primary particles is conserved; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>240</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before and after
coagulation. Same is true for the amount of organic carbon, CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
bSi.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>We round <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the nearest integer. If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, aggregates will
aggregate. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> aggregates stick to each <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> aggregate. The AC that at
the beginning of the time step represented aggregate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> now represents <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
aggregates with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The AC that was aggregate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
unchanged after the time step except that it now represents <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aggregates. The scheme was designed so that the number of ACs
remains unchanged through a aggregation event. This prevents a runaway
escalation of the computational load of the run. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>
shows a schematic of two particles sticking.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Physical characteristics of aggregates</title>
      <p>An aggregate that forms by aggregation of smaller particles forms a fractal
structure with a dimension, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that describes its porosity: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of primary particles and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the radius of the aggregate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.42"/>. The closer
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is to 3, the more the structure fills up three-dimensional space, and the
lower its porosity. The fractal dimension of marine snow has been inferred
from measurements of aggregate properties such as settling velocity,
porosity and size, to be in the range of 1.3 to 2.3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.43"/>. The porosity of marine snow appears to be large, always above 0.9
and mostly closer to 0.99, increasing with the diameter of the aggregate
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx97" id="paren.44"/>. Fecal pellets are more compact, and thus
their porosity is smaller, about 0.43–0.65 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="paren.45"/>. The aggregate
sinking velocity depends on the aggregate radius and porosity. We follow
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.46"/> calculating radius and porosity from the fractal dimension
and composition of the aggregate (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). The fractal
dimension of aggregates in SLAMS is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.47"/>. Fecal
pellets are not fractal in nature, so we use the relationship between fecal
pellet volume and sinking rate developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx110" id="text.48"/> and find that
a porosity of 0.5 results in sinking velocity of model pellets that compare
well to that relationship. The resulting model pellet density for 0.5
porosity is near the range of measured pellet density of 1.08–1.2, depending
on the composition of the pellet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.49"/>. The
aggregate radius, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is obtained from the fractal dimension and the
radius of the primary particle, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E19" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The radius of the primary particle, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is calculated from its
volume under the assumption that it is a perfect sphere:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E20" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mroot><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mroot><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the volume of the primary particles in the aggregate, is
calculated by dividing the total volume of material in the aggregate,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, by the number of primary particles:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E21" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E22" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>mw</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration [mol] of substance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>mw</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
molar weight, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TEP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bSi</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>dust</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The porosity, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is related to the volume of individual particles that
makes up the aggregate to the total volume of the aggregate:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E23" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E24" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.50"/>. The density of the aggregate, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
calculated from the density of the material in the aggregate,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the density of seawater, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sw</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the porosity,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E25" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sw</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Settling</title>
      <p>Sinking velocities of particles range from a few up to hundreds of meters per
day <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="paren.51"/> and have been found to increase with depth
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.52"/>. The sinking orgC flux of particles in the ocean,
binned according to sinking velocity of the particles, has been found to
exhibit a bimodal distribution, with substantial fluxes from particles
sinking at about 1 m d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and close to 1000 m d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, but very
little in between suggesting there are two types of sinking particles that
make up the orgC sinking flux <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx88" id="paren.53"/>.
In SLAMS, the aggregate sinking velocity:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E26" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sw</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sw</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          is calculated using Stokes' law <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.54"/>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
gravity of Earth. For low Reynolds numbers where viscous forces are dominant,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E27" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E28" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is kinematic viscosity. For large Reynolds numbers where
turbulence starts to play a role, the drag coefficient is calculated using
Whites' approximation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E29" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120" id="paren.55"/>, which is valid for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Substituting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with White's approximation results in a
nonlinear equation with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the variable, which we solve for using Newtons'
method. Model aggregates only sink vertically, there are no lateral currents.
Aggregates reach high <italic>Re</italic> conditions when settling at a few hundred
meters per day, depending on their size.</p>
      <p>Within the range of salinity found in the ocean, the viscosity of seawater is
mainly a function of temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.56"/>. We use a formula that
fits empirical data of seawater viscosity at 35 ppt:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E30" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2250</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          to find the viscosity, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, at temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [K]. The change in viscosity
with temperature has a large effect on the sinking velocity of particles. For
the change in sea water temperatures from the sea surface to the sea floor in
the tropics, the change in viscosity leads to a 50 % decrease in sinking
velocity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS8">
  <title>Organic carbon and TEP degradation</title>
      <p>Bacteria are relevant to the biological pump for their role in degradation of
orgC. Organic carbon is a chemically heterogeneous combination of proteins,
lignin and cellulose, which vary in structure and degradability
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118" id="paren.57"/>, and as it degrades, its heterogeneity increases. As
the structure is altered, it becomes increasingly unrecognizable to enzymes,
producing the observed decrease in reactivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.58"/>. TEP
degradation is treated the same way as orgC degradation. Respiration rates
have been measured, both on natural aggregates collected in the ocean, and on
aggregates formed in laboratory roller tanks from freeze-killed diatom ooze.
Higher respiration rates and bacterial production were found in younger
(1–3 days) rather than in older (7–14 days) aggregates, as the labile proteins
were respired first, leaving the less labile material to be respired more
slowly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.59"/>. Observed respiration rates of newly produced
diatom aggregates range between 0.057 and 0.089 d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.60"/> or 0.083 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.034 d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="paren.61"/>,
and generally decrease with time, from 0.09 initially to 0.05 d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 3
days later <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.62"/>.</p>
      <p>To simulate the decrease in degradation rate with orgC age, we track 10 age
bins for orgC in each aggregate, and construct a degradation rate that is
both a function of age and temperature:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E31" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>dorgC</mml:mtext><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the age bin and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C]. The age
of the orgC in bin <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>age</mml:mtext><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days and

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E32" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>age</mml:mtext><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          This relation assigns freshly produced orgC at the sea surface a degradation
lifetime of a few days, and it prescribes a decrease in reaction rate with
phytoplankton age <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.63"/> following
the observations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="text.64"/>. The temperature dependence
results in about a doubling of the reaction rate with 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of
warming, a moderate activation energy of about 45 kJ mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aging of
orgC and TEP is accomplished by transferring <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>age</mml:mtext><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>age</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> orgC (or TEP) from bin <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into
bin <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Material does not age out of the top
bin, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>If the fraction of TEP in an aggregate is less than 0.02, it breaks into
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS9.SSS1"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS9">
  <title>Zooplankton</title>
      <p>The presence of slowly sinking small particles in the deep ocean attests to
the effects of disaggregation or fragmentation of aggregates in the water
column <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.65"/>. In a sectional modeling study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="text.66"/>
treated disaggregation as driven by turbulent flow in the ocean. Laboratory
experiments with diatom aggregates (a fragile form of marine snow) find that
stresses in excess of those due to turbulent shear in the water column are
required to break them, pointing to biological shear and grazing as the
dominant breaking mechanism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.67"/>. The fluid stress required
to break aggregates can be found near appendages of swimming zooplankton
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.68"/>. The abundance of marine snow in surface waters
appears to undergo daily cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx113 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.69"/>, as does concentration of zooplankton. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="normal.70"/>
observed that the mean size of aggregates decreased when the zooplankton
<italic>Euphausia Pacifica</italic> were abundant. Recently, the idea that zooplankton may break
aggregates to decrease their sinking velocity and increase their surface area
to encourage bacteria to break down refractory organic carbon and enhance its
nutritional value has been proposed as a mechanism to close the carbon budget
in the twilight zone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.71"/>. While questions remain
unanswered as to the exact effect zooplankton has on marine particles and
flux, observations suggest that interaction between zooplankton and marine
snow does take place. Zooplankton in our model have the ability to fragment
and ingest aggregates and produce a range of fecal pellet sizes. The
zooplankton encounter rate is the function in SLAMS that is least supported
by science. It is a damped function of how much food there is available. The
factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is chosen by requiring the orgC export to be
100 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the orgC flux to the seafloor to be
about 2.5 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the default forcing.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E33" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>enc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>log</mml:mtext><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E34" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          is the amount of orgC (food) in each depth bin. For each AC, at each time
step, a random number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is generated and compared to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>enc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>enc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the zooplankton do encounter the AC and either ingest it
(all the aggregates it represents) or fragment it.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS9.SSS1">
  <title>Fragmentation</title>
      <p>To determine whether the aggregates encountered by zooplankton are fragmented
or ingested SLAMS first checks if it will be fragmented. We assume the
efficiency for breaking small particles is lower than for breaking large ones
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.72"/>. We account for this relationship with a parameter,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>break</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that increases with aggregate radius, so that it is more
likely that zooplankton are able to break large aggregates than small, if
they do encounter an aggregate. To simulate a smooth function with regard to
aggregate size, we came up with the following equation:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E35" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>break</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mi>arctan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>break</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the particle fragments into a number of daughter
particles. From <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.73"/> we construct a power law with support
between 2 and 24 integers (fragments) that describes the number of fragments,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, a particle breaks into:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E36" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mn>0.91</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            A random number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is compared to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each successive number of
fragments starting from 2. When <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the number of fragments the
aggregate breaks into is found. It is unlikely that very small particles will
be fragmented because of how <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>break</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is constructed; however, if
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then we let <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> meaning the particle fragments into its primary
particles. Mass is always conserved during coagulation or fragmentation. When
a particle is fragmented, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>old</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>old</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, here <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>old</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>old</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stand for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> after and before fragmentation,
respectively. If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>old</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cannot be divided into an integer for the
given number of fragments, it is divided into the nearest integer below and
the remainder mass is divided between the particles and added without adding
primary particles. For example, if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>old</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 17, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>old</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the mass of two
primary particles is divided between the three new aggregates. Here we compromise
in conserving the number of primary particles but do conserve mass.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS9.SSS2">
  <title>Ingestion</title>
      <p>If the particle is fragmented, it cannot be ingested in the same time step,
but if it is not fragmented, then it is evaluated for ingestion. To prevent
zooplankton from ingesting mineral particles with no orgC and dissolving and
repackaging those minerals, an ad hoc parameter is introduced, which adjusts
the probability of ingestion as a function of orgC concentration. The orgC
weight fraction, orgC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is calculated and compared to a random
number <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>wf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the particle is deemed appetitive
and ingested. The model is sensitive to the choice of this parameter. If we
choose <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>wf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>wf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that
decreases the orgC flux by half and increases the orgC flux 3–5-fold,
respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS9.SSS3">
  <title>OrgC assimilation</title>
      <p>The fraction of primary production grazed by microzooplankton estimated using
dilution techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.74"/> leads to 60–75 % of primary
production is consumed by protists and between 2 and 10 % is consumed by
macro-grazers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.75"/>. Other studies find that the fraction of
production consumed by protists is perhaps a little lower, between 20 and
70 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.76"/>, 22 and 44 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.77"/>, and 40 and 60 %
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.78"/>. The relative rates of carbon consumption in the deep
ocean between bacteria and zooplankton vary regionally for reasons that are
not well understood <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.79"/>. By satisfying that
about 60–90 % of orgC that is ingested by zooplankton is assimilated and
the remaining 10–40 % is egested in fecal pellets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.80"/>, the respiration term is both age and
temperature dependant:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E37" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>dorgC</mml:mtext><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            In the model, fecal pellets are represented similarly to aggregates, with the
difference that their porosity is specified to be 50 % as described in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS9.SSS4">
  <title>Biogenic mineral dissolution</title>
      <p>pH of the guts of zooplankton increases during feeding, most likely due to
dissolution of calcium carbonate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.81"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.82"/>
modeled
zooplankton gut chemistry and conclude that up to 10 % of ingested calcium
carbonate can be dissolved during the passage through the gut. Zooplankton
mediated CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution may help explain the apparent 60–80 %
decrease in CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sinking flux in the upper 500–1000 ms of the water
column <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.83"/>, and the water column alkalinity source detected
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.84"/>. In SLAMS, dissolution of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in zooplankton guts
is related to the fraction of the orgC that is assimilated:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E38" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>dCaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>dorgC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>orgC</mml:mtext></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Where CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for calcite, CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents aragonite and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for calcite and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for aragonite.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS10">
  <title>Abiotic mineral dissolution</title>
      <p>In addition to biological dissolution of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in zooplankton guts, there
appears to be significant dissolution of the more soluble CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral
aragonite in the water column <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.85"/>. A significant fraction of
the CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production flux is composed of aragonite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.86"/>,
produced for example by pteropods. Water column conditions reach
undersaturation with respect to aragonite at a shallower water depth than for
calcite. Biogenic silica (bSi), the other main biomineral in the ocean, is
undersaturated throughout the ocean, and is distinguished by a strong
temperature sensitivity of its dissolution rate, dissolving significantly
faster in warm waters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.87"/>. In the deep ocean, carbonate
dissolution is a function of the degree of undersaturation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E39" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>dCaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E40" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mtext>in situ</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          is the saturation state of the sea water for calcite and aragonite.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2 day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5
for calcite and 4.2 for aragonite. The carbonate ion profile or concentration
with depth, [CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>in</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>situ</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is prescribed and
dissolution of calcium carbonate does not feed back on it.</p>
      <p>For bSi dissolution, the dissolution rate is calculated as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E41" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>dbSi</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>size</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bSi</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with temperature sensitivity from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.88"/> as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E42" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11481</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and a size-dependent term:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E43" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>size</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>bSi</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>bSi</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          to simulate the protective organic matrix or membrane that coats live diatoms
and serves as protection to dissolution of frustules <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.89"/>. We assume that non-aggregated diatom cells are alive and thus
have a coating to protect them from dissolving. The sensitivity of the flux
to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>size</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is investigated in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS11">
  <title>Sea surface temperature</title>
      <p>The temperature is constant in the mixed layer. Below the mixed layer
profiles are a linear interpolation from the SST to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 1 km to
2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 4 km. In the model, the temperature is constant over the
course of the year.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS12">
  <title>Carbonate ion profile</title>
      <p>The carbonate ion concentration is set to 220 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
the sea surface and 80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> below 1 km depth. It is
linearly interpolated between the surface and 1 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.90"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS13">
  <title>Mixed layer</title>
      <p>The mixed layer is isothermal as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS11"/>. Particles
in the mixed layer are assigned a random depth within the mixed layer each
time step.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS14">
  <title>A time step</title>
      <p>In a time step (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) a small number (default <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21) of
new particles are produced near the sea surface and their attributes such as
composition, sinking velocity and stickiness are set. The water column is
divided into depth bins (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 m). For pairs of ACs within a
particular depth range (bin), the probability of aggregation is calculated
and compared to a random number to assess whether the pair should stick. If
so, the attributes of both particles involved are updated, the more numerous
class losing members to aggregation with the less numerous class, which
aggregates entirely. The encounter rate of each AC to zooplankton is also
calculated for each depth bin. Next, the model loops through every AC and
checks if it encountered zooplankton, respires orgC and TEP, dissolves
minerals, disintegrates if there is not enough TEP to hold it together, ages
orgC and TEP, checks if the size is small and considered to be dissolved,
calculates new sinking velocity and settles or ascends accordingly. When the
AC reaches the seafloor, its content is cleared and memory is freed for a
new aggregate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>An outline of what the model does in a time step. In parenthesis are
the sections where each task is explained.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Organic carbon export <bold>(a)</bold> and flux to sea
floor <bold>(b)</bold> when model parameter (stickiness, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>), TEP, bacterial respiration <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E32"/>), zooplankton fragmentation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>break</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E35"/>), and zooplankton encounter rate, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>enc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E33"/>)) is multiplied by the scaling factor.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sensitivity of the flux to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>size</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Shown are
seven
model runs changing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>size</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as depicted in the upper left panel.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Sensitivity studies</title>
      <p>To understand the sensitivity of model to parameters not well constrained by
experiments, we run the model where a particular parameter is multiplied by a
scaling factor (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). For stickiness, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>), we look at seven runs where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is multiplied by 1/8,
1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, 4 and 8 and plot the export (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a)
and flux to the seafloor (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b) after the model
reaches steady state. Similarly, we do seven runs for rate of bacterial
respiration, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E32"/>) and zooplankton fragmentation,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>break</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E35"/>). The range of TEP production is
from 1/6 to 16/6 of the default as the model does not handle well TEP values
out of that range. Zooplankton encounter, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>enc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E33"/>), is multiplied by factors between 1/8 and 18/8.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Model output of particle number spectrum at three depths:
100 m <bold>(a)</bold>, 1 km <bold>(b)</bold> and 4 km <bold>(c)</bold>. In each
panel, the output from a 100 m deep column is plotted. The diagonal lines
correspond to slopes <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 (big dash), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 (small dash) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 (dotted).
Sensitivity of the slope of the particle-size spectrum at three depths with
changing zooplankton encounter rate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>enc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and stickiness
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(e)</bold> as a function of the scaling factors and slope as a
function of TEP production <bold>(f)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f06.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p><italic>Stickiness and TEP</italic>. The organic carbon flux is very sensitive to the
stickiness of TEP and amount of TEP produced (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a and
b). As <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases (TEP becomes stickier), organic carbon flux is
increased. Very little stickiness results in almost a breakdown of the
biological pump with very little flux to the seafloor. As stickiness is
increased, flux is increased due to an increase in large and fast sinking
aggregates. An increase in TEP production works to increase flux up to a
certain point, but because of its low density, after that point, more TEP
leads to a decrease in the flux.</p>
      <p><italic>Bacterial respiration</italic>. The fraction of respiration undertaken by
bacteria vs. zooplankton is highly variable regionally and between ecosystems
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.91"/>. Here we multiply Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E32"/>)
by a factor between 1/8 and 8. There is very little change in flux until
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 8 times its default value, where it results in an increase in
large, fast sinking, fluffy aggregates to the seafloor and a decrease in
export (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a and b).</p>
      <p><italic>Zooplankton encounter</italic>. Turning off zooplankton entirely results in a
scenario where there is almost no flux to the sea floor. In this experiment,
particles are relatively buoyant, rich in TEP and sink slowly. When they
enter deep waters undersaturated with regard to calcite their density decreases
further and they cease to sink. We therefore dialed down the zooplankton
encounter rate slowly (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c and d). Very little
zooplankton encounter results in high export and flux to the sea floor being
dominantly large aggregates. As the encounter rate is increased, more small
aggregates reach the seafloor and fewer large aggregates, decreasing the
flux.</p>
      <p><italic>Zooplankton fragmentation</italic>. In the model, if an aggregate is
encountered by zooplankton, it will either fragment it or ingest it. So, as
the probability of fragmenting goes up, less is ingested and respired by
zooplankton. The model is not very sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>break</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p><italic>Diatom organic coating</italic>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the sensitivity
of organic carbon, biogenic silica, calcium carbonate and terrestrial
material flux to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>size</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If diatoms in the model are
allowed to readily dissolve (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>size</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), very little bSi makes it
to the seafloor and the organic carbon flux is decreased by 50 %. The
biogenic silica flux has very little effect on the flux of other minerals.</p>
      <p><italic>Particle-size spectrum</italic>. The particles size spectrum produced by the
model does not seem to be sensitive to environmental or model parameters
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). In our model the slope of the whole spectrum
varies around <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). At the small end (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) it is less steep (between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.5 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3), and at the
large end (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) it is steeper (between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4). This
may be attributed to the different mechanisms primarily responsible for
coagulation for different size classes (Brownian motion, shear, differential
settling) or zooplankton grazing. The slope does not seem to vary
systematically to changes in PP, SST or model parameters.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Temperature profile for the seven mixed layer depths
investigated <bold>(a)</bold>. Organic carbon export <bold>(b)</bold> and flux to the
seafloor <bold>(c)</bold> as a function of mixed layer depth (MLD). Organic
carbon flux down the water column for the seven depths
investigated <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f07.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Analytical solution of the Smoluchovski equation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119" id="paren.92"/> (solid lines) at times 1, 2, 4, …, 64 and model
results for corresponding times: 1 (plus-signs), 2 (crosses), 4 (asterisk), 8
(open boxes), 16 (solid boxes), 32 (open circles), 64 (solid
circles) <bold>(a)</bold>. In all, 10 000 ACs were used here and a total of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles. Results were averaged over 50 runs to generate this
plot. For this comparison, particles do not sink and the collision kernel is
a constant (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The vertical axis is the number of particles
of mass <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> times <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Variation of total mass with
time <bold>(b)</bold> with the collision kernel used in SLAMS for eight different
initial concentrations. Particles coagulate and sink but are not altered by
biological or chemical processes.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f08.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p><italic>Mixed layer</italic>. We investigate the effect of the mixed layer depth on
the orgC flux by experimenting with the temperature profile. If the mixed
layer is not isothermal and its only role is mixing particles, the flux
increases as the depth of the mixed layer is increased. If we let the mixed
layer be isothermal and let the thermocline extend from the bottom of the
mixed layer to 1000 m, there is no appreciable effect on the orgC flux.
Finally, if we let the mixed layer be isothermal and the thickness of the
thermocline be constant, 100 or 300 m, the orgC flux decreases as the mixed
layer depth increases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). The increased time
particles spend in warm waters when the mixed layer is deep contributes to
the increased respiration of orgC and thus less flux.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Model validation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Model–model comparison</title>
      <p>The rational for using a Monte Carlo method over a deterministic method is
the large number of chemical components that can be resolved without
increasing the runtime of the coagulation function. The runtime of the
sectional coagulation model with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical components can be as high as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the number of size bins and
composition-ratio bins; however, with simplifications it is possible to
decrease the computational cost <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.93"/>. In contrast, for a
stochastic model, the runtime of an aggregation simulation is proportional to
the number of ACs squared, and does not increase with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This can be
considerable and probably does not make SLAMS suitable for large ocean
circulation models without simplifications.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The flux of organic carbon in 11 regions. This model (solid line)
and data (symbols) from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.94"/> and two Martin curves using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
estimated from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.95"/> (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>) (line-dot)
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.858</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dotted). The model reaches steady state at about 5–10 years.
We run two instances of each experiment for 18 years and take the mean of the
last 4 years of the two runs.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Variations of the Monte Carlo method for aggregation developed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.96"/> are used to study aggregation in astrophysics
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx121 bib1.bibx109" id="paren.97"/>, atmospheric chemistry
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx109" id="paren.98"/> and oceanography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.99"/>. The approaches vary to fit the goal of each study, for
example, in whether mass or number of ACs is conserved, and in how many true
particles an AC represents.</p>
      <p>One computational difference between the our model and some of these is that
we use a super-droplet method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109 bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx121" id="paren.100"/>,
where each simulated particle (AC) represents a large and variable number of
real particles. The super-droplet method bypasses computational problems that
have historically been considered a great drawback of Monte Carlo methods.
Another distinction is that our model allows for multi-stage aggregation within a
given time step. The main focus of our model of sinking aggregates is
tracking particles, their composition and geometry, as they aggregate and are
chemically and biologically altered by bacteria, zooplankton and water
chemistry.</p>
      <p>To assess the validity of the aggregation method derived in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2"/>, we first look at the evolution of the particle
spectrum with time where particles are not allowed to sink and the collision
kernel is set to constant. We compare this spectrum to the analytical
solution as presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119" id="text.101"/>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a). The Monte Carlo algorithm is able to reproduce
the time evolution of the particle-size spectrum when a minimum of 100
aggregate classes are tracked.
(For the full model runs described below, the number of computational
particles reached about 30 000.) As the statistical significance of the
larger particle-size class in the Monte Carlo model declines, its abundance
is subject to random fluctuations, as seen in the large variations in the
Monte Carlo model at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a).</p>
      <p>In the second test we allow the particles to sink and the curvilinear
collision kernel used in SLAMS is used to determine aggregation. We look at
the decrease of the mass remaining in the top box with time as also studied
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.102"/> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). The similarity of the
simulation results boosts our confidence in the Lagrangian model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Model–data comparison</title>
      <p>Particle-size distribution is a property of marine system; it provides
information about the structure of the ecosystem and particle dynamics. The
particle-size spectrum in the ocean has been measured using particle counters
and imaging methods. The slope of the particle-size spectrum is usually
calculated by dividing the concentration <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of particles in a given
size range <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the size range: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A global
synthesis of the particle-size spectrum found its slope to be in the range
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.103"/> and generally that low PP regions were
associated with a steep spectrum, whereas greater productivity regions often
exhibits a slope between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4. In a study confined to the Arabian
Sea, the slope varied between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 and again the greater negative
values were generally found where PP was lower <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="paren.104"/>. In our
model the slope of the whole spectrum varies around <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Environmental variables for the 11 regions. Primary production in
[mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]. Reference for primary production. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
estimated from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.105"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SST [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">BI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Prim. prod.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Reference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Greenland–Norwegian seas</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">240</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="text.106"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North Atlantic (NABE)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.107"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sargasso Sea (BATS)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="text.108"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Subarctic Pacific (OSP)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.109"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N. C. Pacific Gyre (HOT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="text.110"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Equatorial Pacific</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.111"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.112"/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South China Sea</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.113"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern Ocean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.114"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Arabian Sea</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.115"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Panama Basin</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.116"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NW Africa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.117"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Pe-ratio (the fraction of produced organic carbon that is exported)
as a function of SSTs <bold>(a)</bold> and as a function of PP <bold>(b)</bold> and
export production (orgC flux out of 100 m) as a function of
SSTs <bold>(c)</bold> and PP <bold>(d)</bold> in tropics (plus signs), subtropics
(crosses), subpolar (stars) and coastal (open squares) regions. Data from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.118"/>. Model results (solid squares) from the 11 regions listed
in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The rain ratio (organic carbon to inorganic carbon) of material
reaching the seafloor as a function of latitude. Data from the Southern Ocean
(circles), Pacific Ocean (open squares), Indian Ocean (stars), Atlantic Ocean
(crosses) and Arctic Ocean (plus sign) (data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="altparen.119"/>).
Model results (solid squares) for the 11 regions mentioned
earlier.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f11.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Export ratio (in %) <bold>(a, b)</bold> and percentage of primary
production that reaches 4 km depth – seafloor ratio <bold>(c, d)</bold> as a
function of primary production and sea surface temperatures <bold>(a, c)</bold>
and bloom index <bold>(b, d)</bold>. Numbers represent flux as a percentage of
primary production.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Cumulative flux of organic carbon reaching the seafloor (4 km) as a
function of aggregate radius and velocity for varying sea surface
temperatures <bold>(a, b)</bold>, primary production <bold>(c, d)</bold> and bloom
index <bold>(e, f)</bold>. PP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
<bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>,
SST <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in <bold>(c)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>, <bold>(e)</bold> and
<bold>(f)</bold>, BI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 in <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold> and
<bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1455/2016/gmd-9-1455-2016-f13.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>To see how well the model captures the flux of material in the water column,
we compare three model results to data: the orgC flux in the water column,
the pe-ratio and the rain ratio at the sea floor. Sediment trap data exist in
low resolution, temporally and spatially. Existing data have been analyzed
quite extensively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.120"/>. Our comparison
of data with the model is based on the synthesis of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.121"/>, who
looked for correlations between primary production and export flux and the
attenuation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Martin curve (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) of trap
fluxes from 11 different regions of the world's oceans.
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> shows the values of model driving parameters for the
11 regions and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> compares model results with data. Except
for the Panama Basin, the model predicts the flux to the seafloor within a
factor of 2–5 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). The topography of the Panama Basin is
complex and lateral transport of resuspended material has been observed,
possibly explaining the high orgC flux seen in sediment traps
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.122"/>.</p>
      <p>In SLAMS, export is defined as flux out of the top 100 m. To see if the
model captures relationships to do with export seen in the real world, model
responses to sea surface temperature and rate of primary production are
compared with data in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>. These data were compiled from field
observations of primary production and particle export in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.123"/>.
SLAMS produces the relationship between SST and export production quite well
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a). The positive relationship seen in the date between
export production and high PP is also produced by the model, but because in
most of our test cases PP is relatively low this relationship is not
demonstrated very clearly in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>d. No relationship is seen
in the data between export production and SST, as well as between pe-ratio
and PP. The model also sees no relationships between these pairs
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b and c respectively).</p>
      <p>Lastly, we compare the rain ratio (organic : inorgC) in the sinking carbon
flux at the seafloor with rain ratio data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.124"/>. SLAMS
reproduces the observed value of approximately 1 in the tropics with higher
values in the subtropics and polar latitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>). The
organic : inorgC ratio of primary production is the same in all model runs
except for the Southern Ocean, run where biS production is doubled but
CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production is halved.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>What controls variability in the flux of orgC?</title>
      <p>We assess the response of the model to three environmental parameters: the
temperature profile, rate of primary production, and the bloom index.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> shows the fraction of primary production that sinks
below 100 m (the pe-ratio) and the fraction that reaches the seafloor (the
seafloor ratio) as a function of these parameters. The model responds to all
parameters. An increase of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C results in 1–1.6 % decrease in
the pe-ratio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a).</p>
      <p>The sea floor is also sensitive to changes in SST: as SSTs drop more orgC
makes it to the sea floor. It is most sensitive at low SSTs. Where SST is
lower than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C large (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm) and fast (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
sinking particles contribute significantly to the flux (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a
and b). Given other things are equal, a lower SST increases the efficiency of
the biological pump.</p>
      <p>An increase in primary production increases the number density of particles
and the rate of aggregation. More large particles are produced that have high
sinking velocity where PP is high (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>c and d). OrgC is
exported and transported to the seafloor more efficiently where PP is high
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>c and d). For example, comparing PP at 1400 with 1800
(29 % increase in PP) results in a 97 % increase in orgC flux to the sea
floor, primarily contributed by particles at the large end of the spectrum
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>c and d).</p>
      <p>Both the pe-ratio and the seafloor ratio are sensitive to the bloom index.
Blooms transport orgC more efficiently to depths. Organic carbon flux to the
seafloor is approximately quadrupled when annual production takes place in one-third of a year compared to when it is spread evenly throughout the year. The
effect of concentrating production in blooms is the same as increasing PP; an
increase in cell number densities enhances aggregation and produces more
large and rapidly sinking aggregates (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>e and f).</p>
      <p>Our results suggest that the biological pump is most efficient in
environments that have low SSTs and high or sporadic primary production, such
as polar environments. Our model shows the biological pump is also most
sensitive in polar conditions. For example, in a global warming scenario
where an increase in stratification leads to a smaller nutrient supply to the
surface and a decrease in PP, it predicts greater organic carbon transport
decrease in a polar environment than in a tropical environment. Similarly, a
2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in SST would result in a greater decrease of orgC
transport in a polar environment than in a tropical environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We present a new computational approach to simulating the biological pump
from the surface ocean to the deep sea by resolving collections of individual
particles. The method allows the model to resolve detailed attributes of the
particles that may affect their sinking/degradation dynamics, including the
mineral fraction, the age distribution of the organic matter and the impact
of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) on particle aggregation. The model
is able to reproduce sinking fluxes of orgC through the water column observed
in sediment traps, and some of its regional variation. The model fluxes are
sensitive to the three driving parameters analyzed: SST, primary production
and bloom index. The mechanistic links between these climate-sensitive
drivers and the physics and chemistry of sinking particles in the ocean will
allow us a better understanding of the direction and magnitude of an ocean
biological pump carbon cycle feedback to climate change, both in the past and
in the future.</p>
      <p>We are exploring the feasibility of using our methodology in a larger model.
A study is under way to simplify SLAMS significantly, but keep the Lagrangian
aspect, and couple it to a three-dimensional ocean circulation model. It would be
interesting to look at the importance of the depth of the euphotic zone on
the flux and compare to the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.125"/>. Transport
efficiency is a metric that has been used to describe the variability of the
biological pump <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.126"/> that would be
interesting to explore with SLAMS. A future step in the development of SLAMS
is to add nutrient- and light-limited production. We would also like to put in
a more mechanistic representation of zooplankton activity and see if we can
better understand the effect of the relative importance of microbial vs.
zooplankton respiration. We should like to do more detailed regional studies
and perhaps parameterize <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in terms of environmental variables such as SST,
PP, depth of the mixed layer and euphotic zone or ecology.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Code availability</title>
      <p>The code is available at github: <uri>https://github.com/tinnsi/SLAMS</uri>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Oli Atlason for consulting on probability and statistics and Fred
Ciesla and Adrian Burd for helpful discussion on coagulation. This work was
supported by grant OCE0628629 from NSF.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited
by: G. Munhoven</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Alldredge and Gotschalk(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. and Gotschalk, C.: In situ settling behavior of marine snow,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 33,
339–351, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Alldredge and McGillivary(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. and McGillivary, P.:
The attachment probabilities of marine snow and their implications for particle coagulation in the ocean,
Deep-Sea Res., 38,
431–443, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Alldredge and Silver(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. and Silver, M. W.: Characteristics, Dynamics and Significance
of Marine Snow, Prog. Oceanogr., 20,
41–82, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Alldredge et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A., Granata, G. C., Gotschalk, C. C., and Dickey, T. D.:
The physical strength of marine snow and its implications for particle disaggregation in the ocean,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 35,
1415–1428, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Alldredge et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A., Gotschalk, C., Passow, U., and Riebesell, U.:
Mass aggregation of diatom blooms: Insights from a mesocosm study,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
9–27, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Alonso-Gonzalez et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Alonso-Gonzalez, I., Aristegui, J., Lee, C., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Calafat, A.,
Fabres, J., Sangra, P., Masque, P., Hernandez-Guerra, A., and
Benitez-Barrios, V.: Role of slowly settling particles in the ocean carbon
cycle, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
L13608,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL043827</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Anderson and Archer(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, D. M. and Archer, D.:
Glacial–interglacial stability of ocean pH inferred from foraminifer dissolution rates,
Nature, 416,
70–73,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/416070a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/416070a</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Armstrong et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Armstrong, A. A., Lee, C., Hedges, J. I., Honjo, S., and Wakeham, S. G.:
A new, mechanistic model for organic carbon fluxes in the ocean based on the
quantitative association of POC with ballast minerals, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
49,
219–236, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Arrigo et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. L., and Bushinsky, S.:
Primary production in the Southern Ocean, 1997–2006,
J. Geophys. Res., 113,
C08004,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JC004551</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Barber et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Barber, R. T., Sanderson, M. P., Lindley, S. T., Chai, F., Newton, J., Trees, C. C., Foley, D. G., and Chavez,
F. P.:
Primary productivity and its regulation in the equatorial Pacific during and following the 1991–1992 El Nino,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 43,
933–969, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Barber et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Barber, R. T., Marra, J., Bidigare, R. C., Codispoti, L. A., Halpern, D., Johnson, Z., Latasa, M., Goericke, R., and Smith, S. L.:
Primary productivity and its regulation in the Arabian Sea during 1995,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48,
1127–1172, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Behrenfeld and Boss(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Behrenfeld, M. J. and Boss, E. S.:
Resurrecting the Ecological Underpinnings of Ocean Plankton Blooms,
Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 6, 167–194,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-052913-021325" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-052913-021325</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Behrenfeld and Falkowski(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Behrenfeld, M. J. and Falkowski, P. G.:
Photosynthetic Rates Derived from Satellite-Based Chlorophyll Concentration, Limnol.
Oceanogr.,
42,
1–20, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Berelson(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Berelson, W. M.:
Particle settling rates increase with depth in the ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
49,
237–251, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Biddanda and Pomeroy(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Biddanda, B. A. and Pomeroy, L. R.:
Microbial aggregation and degradation of phytoplankton-derived detritus in seawater. I. Microbial succession,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
42,
79-88, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Bishop et al.(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Bishop, J. K. B., Stephien, J. C., and Wiebe, P. H.:
Particulate Matter Distributions, Chemistry and Flux in the Panama Basin: Response to Environmental Forcing,
Prog. Oceanogr., 17,
1–59, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Bochdansky et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Bochdansky, A. B., Deibel, D., and Rivkin, R. B.:
Absorption efficiencies and biochemical fractionation of assimilated compounds in the cold water appendicularian Oikopleura vanhoeffeni,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 44,
415–424, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Boyd and Harrison(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W. and Harrison, P. J.:
Phytoplankton dynamics in the NE subarctic Pacific,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 46,
2405–2432, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Boyd and Trull(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W. and Trull, T. W.:
Understanding the export of biogenic particles in oceanic waters: Is there a consensus?,
Prog. Oceanogr.,
46,
2405–2432, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Buesseler and Boyd(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O. and Boyd, P. W.: hedding light on processes that control
particle export and flux attenuation in the twilight zone of the open ocean,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54,
1210–1232, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Buesseler et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O., Trull, T. W., Steinberg, D. K., Silver, M. W., Siegel, D.
A., Saitoh, S.-I., Lamborg, C. H., Lam, P. J., Karl, D. M., Jiao, N. Z.,
Honda, M. C., Elskens, M., Dehairs, F., Brown, S. L., Boyd, P. W., Bishop, J.
K. B., and Bidgare, R. R.: VERTIGO (VERtical Transport In the Global Ocean):
A study of particle sources and flux attenuation in the North Pacific,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55,
1522–1539, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Burd and Jackson(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Burd, A. and Jackson, G. A.: Predicting particle coagulation and
sedimentation rates for a pulsed input,
J. Geophys. Res.,
102, 10545–10561, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Burd and Jackson(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Burd, A. and Jackson, G. A.:
Particle Aggregation,
Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1,
65–90, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Burd et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Burd, A., Jackson, G. A., and Moran, S. B.: The role of the particle size
spectrum in estimating POC fluxes from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U
disequilibrium, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 54, 897–918,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.03.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2007.03.006</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Chen(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y.-L. L.:
Spatial and seasonal variations of nitrate-based new production and primary production in the South China Sea,
ICES, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I., 52,
319–340, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Dam and Drapeau(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Dam, H. G. and Drapeau, D. T.:
Coagulation efficiency, organic-matter glues and the dynamics of particles during a phytoplankton bloom in a mesocosm study,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
111–123, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Dilling and Alldredge(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Dilling, L. and Alldredge, A. L.:
Fragmentation of marine snow by swimming macrozooplankton: A new process impacting carbon cycling in the sea,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 47,
1227–1245, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Dilling et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Dilling, L., Wilson, J., Steinberg, D., and Alldredge, A. L.:
Feeding by the euphausiid Euphausia pacifica and the copepod Calanus pacificus on marine snow,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 170,
189–201, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Dorsey(1940)</label><mixed-citation>
Dorsey, N. E.:
The properties of ordinary water substance,
Reinhold Pub. Corp., New York, 1940.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Ducklow et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Ducklow, H. W., Steinberg, D. K., and Buesseler, K. O.:
Upper Ocean Carbon Export and the Biological Pump,
Oceanography, 14,
50–58, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Dunne et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Dunne, J. P., Armstrong, R. A., Gnanadesikan, A., and Sarmiento, J. L.:
Empirical and mechanistic models for the particle export ratio,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19,
GB4026,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002390</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>El Saadi and Bah(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
El Saadi, N. and  Bah, A.:
An individual-based model for studying the aggregation behavior in phytoplankton,
Ecol. Model., 204,
193–212, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Emerson and Hedges(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Emerson, S. and  Hedges, J. I.:
Processes controlling the organic carbon content of open ocean sediments,
Paleoceanography, 3,
621–634, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Engel(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Engel, A.:
The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the increase in apparent particle stickiness (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the decline of a diatom bloom,
J. Plankton Res., 22,
485-497, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Engel et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Engel, A., Abramson, L., Szlosek, J., Liu, Z., Stewart, G., Hirschberg, D., and Lee, C.:
Investigating the effect of ballasting by CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic>, II: Decomposition of particulate organic matter,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56,
1408–1419.
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.11.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.11.028</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Fabry and Deuser(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Fabry, V. J. and Deuser, W. G.:
Aragonite and magnesian calcite fluxes to the deep Sargasso Sea,
Deep-Sea Res., 38,
713–728, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Feely et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Feely, R. A., Nojiri, Y., Dickson, A., Sabine, C. L., Lamb, M. F., and Ono, T.:
Impact of anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system in the oceans,
Science, 305,
362–366, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Feinberg and Dam(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Feinberg, L. R. and Dam, H. G.:
Effects of diet on dimensions, density and sinking rates of fecal pellets of the copepod Acartia tonsa,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 175,
87–96, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Feng et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Hare, C. E., Leblanc, K., Rose, J. M., Zhang, Y., DiTullio, G. R.,
Lee, P. A., Wilhelm, S. W., Rowe, J. M., Sun, J., Nemcek, N., Gueguen, C., Passow,
U., Benner,
I., Brown, C., and Hutchins, D. A.: Effects of increased <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
temperature on the North Atlantic spring bloom. I. The phytoplankton
community and biogeochemical response, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 388, 13–25,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps08133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps08133</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Francois et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Francois, R., Honjo, S., Krishfield, R., and Manganini, S.:   Factors controlling the flux of organic carbon to the bathypelagic zone of the ocean,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16,
1087,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GB001722</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Friedlingstein et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Friedlingstein, P., Bopp, L., Ciais, P., Dufresne, J.-L., Fairhead, L., and Orr, J.:
Positive feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
28
1543–1546, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Gangstø et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Gangstø, R., Gehlen, M., Schneider, B., Bopp, L., Aumont, O., and Joos,
F.: Modeling the marine aragonite cycle: changes under rising carbon dioxide
and its role in shallow water CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution, Biogeosciences, 5,
1057–1072, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1057-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-5-1057-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Gehlen et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Gehlen, M., Bopp, L., Emprin, N., Aumont, O., Heinze, C., and Ragueneau, O.:
Reconciling surface ocean productivity, export fluxes and sediment
composition in a global biogeochemical ocean model, Biogeosciences, 3,
521–537, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-521-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-3-521-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Gelbard et al.(1980)</label><mixed-citation>Gelbard, F., Tambour, Y., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Sectional representation for simulating aerosol dynamics,
J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 76,
541–556,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(80)90394-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9797(80)90394-X</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Giering et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Giering, S. L. C., Sanders, R., Lampitt, R. S., Anderson, T. R., Tamburini, C., Boutrif, M., Zubkov, M. V., Marsay, C. M., Henson, S. A., Saw, K., Cook, K., and Mayor, D. J.:
Reconciliation of the carbon budget in the ocean's twilight zone,
Nature, 507,
480–483,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13123</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Gillespie(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Gillespie, D. T.:
An Exact Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Coalescence Process in a Cloud,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
32,
1977–1989, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Gnanadesikan(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Gnanadesikan, A.:
A global model of silicon cycling: Sensitivity to eddy parameterization and dissolution,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13,
199–220, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Goldthwait et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Goldthwait, S., Yen, J., Brown, J., and Alldredge, A.:
Quantification of marine snow fragmentation by swimming euphausiids,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 49,
940–952, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Graham et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Graham, W. M., MacIntyre, S., and Alldredge, A. L.:
Diel variations of marine snow concentration in surface waters and implications for particle flux in the sea,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
47,
367–395, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Grossart and Ploug(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Grossart, H. P. and Ploug, H.:
Bacterial production and growth efficiencies: Direct measurements on riverine aggregates,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 45,
436–445, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Grossart and Ploug(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Grossart, H. P. and Ploug, H.:
Microbial degradation of organic carbon and nitrogen on diatom aggregates,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 46,
267–277, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Grossart et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Grossart, H. P., Hietanen, S., and Ploug, H.:
Microbial dynamics on diatom aggregates in Oresund, Denmark,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 249,
69–78, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Guidi et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Guidi, L., Stemmann, L., Jackson, G. A., Ibanez, F., Claustre, H., Legendre, L., Picheral, M., and Gorsky,  G.:
Effects of phytoplankton community on production, size and export of large aggregates: A world-ocean analysis,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54,
1951–1963, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Guidi et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Guidi, L., Legendre, L., Reygondeau, G., Uitz, J., Stemmann, L., and Henson, S. A.:
A new look at ocean carbon remineralization for estimating deepwater sequestration,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29,
1044–1059,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB005063</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Hedges and Keil(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I. and Keil, R. G.:
Sedimentary organic matter preservation: An assessment and speculative synthesis,
Mar. Chem., 49,
81–115, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Henson et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Henson, S. A., Sanders, R., and Madsen, E.:
Global patterns in efficiency of particulate organic carbon export and transfer to the deep ocean,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26,
GB1028,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004099</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Honjo et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Honjo, S., Manganini, S. J., Krishfield, R. A., and Francois, R.:
Particulate organic carbon fluxes to the ocean interior and factors controlling the biological pump: A synthesis of global sediment trap programs since 1983,
Prog. Oceanogr.,
76,
217–285, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Huntsman and Barber(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Huntsman, S. A. and Barber, R. T.:
Primary production off northwest Africa: the relationship to wind and nutrient conditions,
Deep-Sea Res., 24,
25–33, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Jackson and Lochmann(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A. and Lochmann, S. E.:
Effect of coagulation on nutrient and light limitation of an algal bloom,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 37,
77–89, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Jackson(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A.:
Comparing observed changes in particle size spectra with those predicted using coagulation theory,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
159–184, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Jackson(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A.:
Using Fractal Scaling and Two-Dimensional Particle Size Spectra to Calculate Coagulation Rates for Heterogeneous Systems,
J. Colloid Interf. Sci.,
202,
20–29, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Jansen and Wolf-Gladrow(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Jansen, H. and Wolf-Gladrow, D. A.:
Carbonate dissolution in copepod guts: a numerical model,
Comparing observed changes in particle size spectra with those predicted using coagulation theory,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 221,
199–207, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Jokulsdottir(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Jokulsdottir, T.:
Sinking Biological Aggregates in the Ocean: A modelling study, PhD
dissertation,
University of Chicago,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Kahl et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Kahl, L. A., Vardi,  A., and Schofield, O.:
Effects of phytoplankton physiology on export flux,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 354,
3–19, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Kamatani(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Kamatani, A.:
Dissolution Rates of Silica from Diatoms Decomposing at Various Temperatures,
Mar. Biol., 68,
91–96, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Khelifa and Hill(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Khelifa, A. and Hill, P. S.:
Kinematic assessment of floc formation using a Monte Carlo model,
J. Hydrol. Res.,
44,
548–559, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Kiorboe(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kiorboe, T.: Colonization of Marine Snow Aggregates by Invertebrate Zooplankton: Abundance, Scaling, and Possible Role,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 45,
479–484, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Klaas and Archer(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Klaas, C. and Archer, D. E.:
Association of sinking organic matter with various types of mineral ballast in the deep sea: Implications for the rain ratio,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16,
1116
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GB001765</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Krause et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Krause, J. W., Nelson, D. M., and Brzezinski, M. A.:
Biogenic silica production and the diatom contribution to primary production and nitrate uptake in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 58,
434–438, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Kriest and Evans(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I. and  Evans, G. T.:
A vertically resolved model for phytoplankton aggregation,
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Platet. Sci.), 109,
453–469, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Kwon et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y., Primeau, F., and Sarmiento, J. L.:
The impact of remineralization depth on the air-sea carbon balance,
Nat. Geosci., 2,
630–635, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Lam et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Lam, P. J., Doney, S. C., and Bishop, J. K. B.:
The dynamic ocean biological pump: Insights from a global compilation of particulate organic carbon, CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and opal concentration profiles from the mesopelagic, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
25, GB3009, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003868</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Lampitt et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Lampitt, R. S., Wishner, K. F., Turley  C. M., and Angel, M. V.:
Marine snow studies in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean: Distribution, composition and role as a food source for migrating plankton,
Mar. Biol.,
116,
689–702, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Lampitt et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Lampitt, R. S., Salter, I., de Cuevas, B. A., Hartman, S., Larkin, K. E., and Pebody, C. A.:
Long-term variability of downward particle flux in the deep northeast Atlantic: Causes and trends,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 57,
1346–1361, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Landry and Calbet(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Landry, M. R. and Calbet, A.:
Microzooplankton production in the oceans,
ICES, J. Mar. Sci., 61,
501–507, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Landry and Hassett(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Landry, M. R. and Hassett, R. P.:
Estimating the Grazing Impact of Marine Micro-zooplankton,
Mar. Biol., 67,
283–288, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Le Moigne et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Le Moigne, F. A. C., Gallinari, M., Laurenceau, E., and De La Rocha, C. L.:
Enhanced rates of particulate organic matter remineralization by
microzooplankton are diminished by added ballast minerals, Biogeosciences,
10, 5755–5765, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5755-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-5755-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Lewin(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewin, J. C.:
The dissolution of silica from diatom walls,
Geochim. Costmochim. Ac., 21,
182–198, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Li and Logan(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X. Y. and Logan, B. E.:
Size distributions and fractal properties of particles during a simulated phytoplankton bloom in a mesocosm,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
128–138, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Lima et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Lima, I. D., Lam, P. J., and Doney, S. C.: Dynamics of particulate organic
carbon flux in a global ocean model, Biogeosciences, 11, 1177–1198,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1177-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-1177-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Logan and Wilkinson(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Logan, B. E. and Wilkinson, D. B.:
Fractal goemetry of marine snow and other biological aggregates,
Limnol. Oceanogr.,
35,
130–136, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Logan et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Logan, B. E., Passow, U., Alldredge, A. L., Grossart, H.-P., and Simon, M.:
Rapid formation and sedimentation of large aggregates is predictable from
coagulation rates (half-lives) of transparent exoplolymer particles (TEP),
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
203–214, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Lutz et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Lutz, M. J., Dunbar, R. B., and Caldeira, K.: Regional variability in the
vertical flux of particulate organic carbon in the ocean interior, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 16,
1037,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GB001383</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Mari(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Mari, X.: Does ocean acidification induce an upward flux of marine
aggregates?, Biogeosciences, 5, 1023–1031, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1023-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-5-1023-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Marsay et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Marsay, C., Sanders, R., Henson, S., Pabortsava, K., Achterberg, E., and
Lampitt, R.: Attenuation of sinking particulate organic carbon flux through
the mesopelagic ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112, 1089–1094,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415311112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1415311112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Martin et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.:
VERTEX: Carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific,
Deep-Sea Res., 34,
267–285, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Mayor et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Mayor, D. J., Sanders, R., Giering,  S. L. C., and Anderson, T. R.:
Microbial gardening in the ocean's twilight zone: Detritivorous metazoans benefit from fragmenting, rather than ingesting, sinking detritus,
Bioessays, 36,
1132–1137, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>McDonnell and Buesseler(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
McDonnell, A. M. P. and Buesseler, K. O.:
Variability in the average sinking velocity of marine particles,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 55,
2085–2096, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Middelburg(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Middelburg, J. J.:
A simple rate model for organic matter decomposition in marine sediments,
Geochim. Costmochim. Ac., 53,
1577–1581, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Milliman et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Milliman, J. D., Troy, P. J., Balch, W. M., Adams, A. K., Li, Y.-H., and Mackenzie, F. T.:
Biologically mediated dissolution of calcium carbonate above the chemical lysocline?,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 46,
1653–1669, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Najjar et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Najjar, R. G., Jin, X., Louanchi, F., Aumont, O., Caldeira, K., Doney, S. C.,
Dutay, J.-C., Follows, M., Gruber, N., Joos, F., Lindsay, K., Maier-Reimer,
E., Matear, R. J., Matsumoto, K., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A., Orr, J. C.,
Plattner, G.-K., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R. D., Weirig,
M.-F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.: Impact of circulation on export
production, dissolved organic matter, and dissolved oxygen in the ocean:
Results from Phase II of the Ocean Carbon-cycle Model Intercomparison Project
(OCMIP-2), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21,
GB3007,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002857</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Ormel and Spaans(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Ormel, C. W. and Spaans, M.: Monte Carlo Simulation of Particle Interactions
at high dynamic range: Advancing beyond the Googol, Astrophys. J., 684,
1291–1309, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Passow and Alldredge(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U. and Alldredge, A. L.:
Distribution, size and bacterial colonization of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the ocean,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
113,
185–198, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Passow and De La Rocha(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Passow, U. and De La Rocha, C. L.:
Accumulation of ballast on organic aggregates,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20,
GB1013,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GB002579</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Passow et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Passow, U., De La Rocha, C. L., Fairfield, C., and Schmidt, K.:
Aggregation as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mineral particles,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 59,
532–547,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.2.0532" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2014.59.2.0532</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Ploug and Grossart(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H. and Grossart, H.-P.:
Bacterial growth and grazing on diatom aggregates: Respiratory carbon turnover as a function of aggregate size and sinking velocity,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 45,
1467–1475, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Ploug et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H., Iversen, M. H., and Fischer, G.:
Ballast, sinking velocity, and apparent diffusivity within marine snow and zooplankton fecal pellets: Implications for substrate turnover by attached bacteria,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 53,
1878–1886, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Pond et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Pond, D. W., Harris, R. P., and Brownlee, C.: A microinjection technique
using a pH sensitive dye to determine the gut pH of calanus-helgolandicus,
Mar. Biol., 123, 75–79, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Richardson et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, T. L., Jackson, G. A., Ducklow, H. W., and Roman, M. R.: Carbon
fluxes through food webs of the eastern equatorial Pacific: An inverse
approach,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
51,
1245–1274, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Richardson et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, K., Markager, S., Buch, E., Lassen, M. F., and Kristensen, A. S.:
Seasonal distribution of primary production, phytoplankton biomass and size distribution in the Greenland Sea,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
52,
979–999, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Riemer et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Riemer, N.,  West, M., Zaveri, R. A., and Easter, R. C.:
Simulating the evolution of soot mixing state with a particle-resolved aerosol model,
J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D09202,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011073</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Riley et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Riley, J. S., Sanders, R., Marsay, C., Le Moigne, F. A. C., Achterberg, E. P., and Poulton, A. J.:
The relative contribution of fast and slow sinking particles to ocean carbon export,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26,
GB1026,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004085</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Riser et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Riser, C. W., Wassmann, P., Reigstad, M., and Seuthe, L.:
Vertical flux regulation by zooplankton in the northern Barents Sea during Arctic spring,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55,
2320–2329, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Robinson et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, C., Steinberg, D. K., Anderson, T. R., Aristegui, J., Carlson, C.
A., Frost, J. R., Ghiglione, J.-F., Hernandez-Leon, S., Jackson, G. A.,
Koppelmann, R., Queguiner, B., Rageneau, O., Rassoulzadegan, F., Robinson, B.
H., Tamburini, C., Tanaka, T., Wishner, K. F., and Zhang, J.:
Mesopelagic zone ecology and biogeochemistry – a synthesis,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
57,
1504–1518, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Roullier et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Roullier, F., Berline, L., Guidi, L., Durrieu De Madron, X., Picheral, M.,
Sciandra, A., Pesant, S., and Stemmann, L.: Particle size distribution and
estimated carbon flux across the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone,
Biogeosciences, 11, 4541–4557, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4541-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-4541-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Ruiz(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Ruiz, J.:
What generates daily cycles of marine snow?,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
44,
1105–1126, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Saba et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Saba, V. S., Friedrichs, M. A. M., Carr, M. E., Antoine, D., Armstrong, R.
A., Asanuma, I., Aumont, O., Bates, N. R., Behrenfeld, M. J., Bennington, V.,
Bopp, L., Bruggeman, J., Buitenhuis, E. T., Church, M. J., Ciotti, A. M.,
Doney, S. C., Dowell, M., Dunne, J., Dutkiewicz, S., Gregg, W., Hoepffner,
N., Hyde, K. J. W., Ishizaka, J., Kameda, T., Karl, D. M., Lima, I., Lomas,
M. W., Marra, J., McKinley, G. A., Melin, F., Moore, J. K., Morel, A.,
OReilly, J., Salihoglu, B., Scardi, M., Smyth, T. J., Tang, S., Tjiputra, J.,
Uitz, J., Vichi, M., Waters, K., Westberry, T. K., and Yool, A.:
Challenges of modeling depth integrated marine primary productivity over multiple decades: A case study at BATS and HOT,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24,
GB3020,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003655" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003655</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Schneider et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, B., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.:
Assessing the sensitivity of modeled air-sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange to the remineralization depth of particulate organic and inorganic carbon,
Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
22,
GB3021,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB003100</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Shima et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Shima, S., Kusano, K., Kawano, A., Sugiyama, T., and Kawahara, S.:
The super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: A particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non-hydrostatic model,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135,
1307–1320, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Small et al.(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Small, L. F., Fowler, S. W., and Unlu, M. Y.:
Sinking rates of natural copepod fecal pellets,
Mar. Biol., 51,
233–241, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Steinberg et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Steinberg, D. K., Van Mooy,  B. A. S., Buesseler, K. O., Boyd, P. W., Kobari, T., and Karl, D. M.:
Bacterial vs. zooplankton control of sinking particle flux in the ocean's twilight zone,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 53,
1327–1338, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Stemmann and Boss(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Stemmann, L. and Boss, E.:
Plankton and Particle Size and Packaging: From Determining Optical Properties to Driving the Biological Pump,
Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 4,
263–290,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100853</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Stemmann et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Stemmann, L., Picheral, M., and Gorsky, G.:
Diel variation in the vertical distribution of particulate matter (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 mm) in the NW Mediterranean Sea investigated with the Underwater Video Profiler,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 47,
505–531, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Stemmann et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Stemmann, L., Jackson,  G. A., and Ianson, D.:
A vertical model of particle size distributions and fluxes in the midwater column that includes biological and physical processes – Part I: model formulation,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
51,
865–884, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Tande and Slagstad(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Tande, K. S. and Slagstad,  D.:
Assimilation efficiency in herbivorous aquatic organisms – The potential of the ratio method using l4C and biogenic silica as markers
Limnol. Oceanogr., 30,
1093–1099, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Trull et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Trull, T. W., Bray, S. G., Buesseler, K. O., Lamborg, C. H., Manganini, S., Moy, C., and Valdes, J.:
In situ measurements of mesopelagic particle sinking rates and the control of carbon transfer
to the ocean interior during the Vertical Flux in the Global Ocean (VERTIGO)
voyages in the North Pacific, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
55,
1684–1695,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.04.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.04.021</ext-link>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Verdugo et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Verdugo, P., Alldredge,  A. L., Azam, F., Kirchman, D. L., Passowa, U., and Santschi, P. H.:
The oceanic gel phase: a bridge in the DOM-POM continuum,
Mar. Chem.,
92,
67–85,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2004.06.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2004.06.017</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Westrich and Berner(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Westrich, J. T. and Berner,  R. A.:
The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: The G model tested,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 29,
236–249, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx119"><label>Wetherill(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Wetherill, G. W.:
Comparison of Analytical and Physical Modeling of Planetesimal Accumulation,
Icarus, 88,
336–354, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx120"><label>White(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
White, F. M.:
Viscous Fluid Flow,
McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx121"><label>Zsom and Dullemond(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Zsom, A. and Dullemond, C. P.:
A representative particle approach to coagulation and fragmentation of dust aggregates and fluid droplets,
Astron. Astrophys., 489,
931–941,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200809921" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361:200809921</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>A stochastic, Lagrangian model of sinking biogenic aggregates in the ocean (SLAMS 1.0): model formulation, validation and sensitivity</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">We present a new mechanistic model, stochastic, Lagrangian aggregate model of sinking particles (SLAMS) for the biological pump in the ocean, which tracks
the evolution of individual particles as they aggregate, disaggregate, sink,
and are altered by chemical and biological processes. SLAMS considers the
impacts of ballasting by mineral phases, binding of aggregates by transparent exopolymer particles (TEP), zooplankton grazing and the fractal geometry
(porosity) of the aggregates. Parameterizations for age-dependent organic carbon (orgC) degradation kinetics, and disaggregation driven by zooplankton
grazing and TEP degradation, are motivated by observed particle fluxes and
size spectra throughout the water column. The model is able to explain
observed variations in orgC export efficiency and rain ratio from the
euphotic zone and to the sea floor as driven by sea surface temperature and
the primary production rate and seasonality of primary production. The model
provides a new mechanistic framework with which to predict future changes on
the flux attenuation of orgC in response to climate change forcing.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Alldredge and Gotschalk(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. and Gotschalk, C.: In situ settling behavior of marine snow,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 33,
339–351, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Alldredge and McGillivary(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. and McGillivary, P.:
The attachment probabilities of marine snow and their implications for particle coagulation in the ocean,
Deep-Sea Res., 38,
431–443, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Alldredge and Silver(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. and Silver, M. W.: Characteristics, Dynamics and Significance
of Marine Snow, Prog. Oceanogr., 20,
41–82, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Alldredge et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A., Granata, G. C., Gotschalk, C. C., and Dickey, T. D.:
The physical strength of marine snow and its implications for particle disaggregation in the ocean,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 35,
1415–1428, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Alldredge et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A., Gotschalk, C., Passow, U., and Riebesell, U.:
Mass aggregation of diatom blooms: Insights from a mesocosm study,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
9–27, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Alonso-Gonzalez et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Alonso-Gonzalez, I., Aristegui, J., Lee, C., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Calafat, A.,
Fabres, J., Sangra, P., Masque, P., Hernandez-Guerra, A., and
Benitez-Barrios, V.: Role of slowly settling particles in the ocean carbon
cycle, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
L13608,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043827" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GL043827</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Anderson and Archer(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, D. M. and Archer, D.:
Glacial–interglacial stability of ocean pH inferred from foraminifer dissolution rates,
Nature, 416,
70–73,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/416070a" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/416070a</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Armstrong et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Armstrong, A. A., Lee, C., Hedges, J. I., Honjo, S., and Wakeham, S. G.:
A new, mechanistic model for organic carbon fluxes in the ocean based on the
quantitative association of POC with ballast minerals, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
49,
219–236, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Arrigo et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. L., and Bushinsky, S.:
Primary production in the Southern Ocean, 1997–2006,
J. Geophys. Res., 113,
C08004,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004551" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JC004551</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Barber et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Barber, R. T., Sanderson, M. P., Lindley, S. T., Chai, F., Newton, J., Trees, C. C., Foley, D. G., and Chavez,
F. P.:
Primary productivity and its regulation in the equatorial Pacific during and following the 1991–1992 El Nino,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 43,
933–969, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Barber et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Barber, R. T., Marra, J., Bidigare, R. C., Codispoti, L. A., Halpern, D., Johnson, Z., Latasa, M., Goericke, R., and Smith, S. L.:
Primary productivity and its regulation in the Arabian Sea during 1995,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48,
1127–1172, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Behrenfeld and Boss(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Behrenfeld, M. J. and Boss, E. S.:
Resurrecting the Ecological Underpinnings of Ocean Plankton Blooms,
Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 6, 167–194,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-052913-021325" target="_blank">doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-052913-021325</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Behrenfeld and Falkowski(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Behrenfeld, M. J. and Falkowski, P. G.:
Photosynthetic Rates Derived from Satellite-Based Chlorophyll Concentration, Limnol.
Oceanogr.,
42,
1–20, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Berelson(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Berelson, W. M.:
Particle settling rates increase with depth in the ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
49,
237–251, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Biddanda and Pomeroy(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Biddanda, B. A. and Pomeroy, L. R.:
Microbial aggregation and degradation of phytoplankton-derived detritus in seawater. I. Microbial succession,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
42,
79-88, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Bishop et al.(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Bishop, J. K. B., Stephien, J. C., and Wiebe, P. H.:
Particulate Matter Distributions, Chemistry and Flux in the Panama Basin: Response to Environmental Forcing,
Prog. Oceanogr., 17,
1–59, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Bochdansky et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Bochdansky, A. B., Deibel, D., and Rivkin, R. B.:
Absorption efficiencies and biochemical fractionation of assimilated compounds in the cold water appendicularian Oikopleura vanhoeffeni,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 44,
415–424, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Boyd and Harrison(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W. and Harrison, P. J.:
Phytoplankton dynamics in the NE subarctic Pacific,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 46,
2405–2432, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Boyd and Trull(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W. and Trull, T. W.:
Understanding the export of biogenic particles in oceanic waters: Is there a consensus?,
Prog. Oceanogr.,
46,
2405–2432, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Buesseler and Boyd(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O. and Boyd, P. W.: hedding light on processes that control
particle export and flux attenuation in the twilight zone of the open ocean,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54,
1210–1232, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Buesseler et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O., Trull, T. W., Steinberg, D. K., Silver, M. W., Siegel, D.
A., Saitoh, S.-I., Lamborg, C. H., Lam, P. J., Karl, D. M., Jiao, N. Z.,
Honda, M. C., Elskens, M., Dehairs, F., Brown, S. L., Boyd, P. W., Bishop, J.
K. B., and Bidgare, R. R.: VERTIGO (VERtical Transport In the Global Ocean):
A study of particle sources and flux attenuation in the North Pacific,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55,
1522–1539, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Burd and Jackson(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Burd, A. and Jackson, G. A.: Predicting particle coagulation and
sedimentation rates for a pulsed input,
J. Geophys. Res.,
102, 10545–10561, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Burd and Jackson(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Burd, A. and Jackson, G. A.:
Particle Aggregation,
Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1,
65–90, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Burd et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Burd, A., Jackson, G. A., and Moran, S. B.: The role of the particle size
spectrum in estimating POC fluxes from <sup>234</sup>Th ∕ <sup>238</sup>U
disequilibrium, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 54, 897–918,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.03.006" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2007.03.006</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Chen(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y.-L. L.:
Spatial and seasonal variations of nitrate-based new production and primary production in the South China Sea,
ICES, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I., 52,
319–340, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Dam and Drapeau(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Dam, H. G. and Drapeau, D. T.:
Coagulation efficiency, organic-matter glues and the dynamics of particles during a phytoplankton bloom in a mesocosm study,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
111–123, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Dilling and Alldredge(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Dilling, L. and Alldredge, A. L.:
Fragmentation of marine snow by swimming macrozooplankton: A new process impacting carbon cycling in the sea,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 47,
1227–1245, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Dilling et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Dilling, L., Wilson, J., Steinberg, D., and Alldredge, A. L.:
Feeding by the euphausiid Euphausia pacifica and the copepod Calanus pacificus on marine snow,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 170,
189–201, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Dorsey(1940)</label><mixed-citation>
Dorsey, N. E.:
The properties of ordinary water substance,
Reinhold Pub. Corp., New York, 1940.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Ducklow et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Ducklow, H. W., Steinberg, D. K., and Buesseler, K. O.:
Upper Ocean Carbon Export and the Biological Pump,
Oceanography, 14,
50–58, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Dunne et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Dunne, J. P., Armstrong, R. A., Gnanadesikan, A., and Sarmiento, J. L.:
Empirical and mechanistic models for the particle export ratio,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19,
GB4026,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002390" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004GB002390</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>El Saadi and Bah(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
El Saadi, N. and  Bah, A.:
An individual-based model for studying the aggregation behavior in phytoplankton,
Ecol. Model., 204,
193–212, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Emerson and Hedges(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Emerson, S. and  Hedges, J. I.:
Processes controlling the organic carbon content of open ocean sediments,
Paleoceanography, 3,
621–634, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Engel(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.:
The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the increase in apparent particle stickiness (<i>α</i>) during the decline of a diatom bloom,
J. Plankton Res., 22,
485-497, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Engel et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Abramson, L., Szlosek, J., Liu, Z., Stewart, G., Hirschberg, D., and Lee, C.:
Investigating the effect of ballasting by CaCO<sub>3</sub> in <i>Emiliania huxleyi</i>, II: Decomposition of particulate organic matter,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56,
1408–1419.
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.11.028" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.11.028</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Fabry and Deuser(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Fabry, V. J. and Deuser, W. G.:
Aragonite and magnesian calcite fluxes to the deep Sargasso Sea,
Deep-Sea Res., 38,
713–728, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Feely et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Feely, R. A., Nojiri, Y., Dickson, A., Sabine, C. L., Lamb, M. F., and Ono, T.:
Impact of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> on the CaCO<sub>3</sub> system in the oceans,
Science, 305,
362–366, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Feinberg and Dam(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Feinberg, L. R. and Dam, H. G.:
Effects of diet on dimensions, density and sinking rates of fecal pellets of the copepod Acartia tonsa,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 175,
87–96, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Feng et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, Y., Hare, C. E., Leblanc, K., Rose, J. M., Zhang, Y., DiTullio, G. R.,
Lee, P. A., Wilhelm, S. W., Rowe, J. M., Sun, J., Nemcek, N., Gueguen, C., Passow,
U., Benner,
I., Brown, C., and Hutchins, D. A.: Effects of increased <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and
temperature on the North Atlantic spring bloom. I. The phytoplankton
community and biogeochemical response, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 388, 13–25,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps08133" target="_blank">doi:10.3354/meps08133</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Francois et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Francois, R., Honjo, S., Krishfield, R., and Manganini, S.:   Factors controlling the flux of organic carbon to the bathypelagic zone of the ocean,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16,
1087,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001722" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001GB001722</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Friedlingstein et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Friedlingstein, P., Bopp, L., Ciais, P., Dufresne, J.-L., Fairhead, L., and Orr, J.:
Positive feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
28
1543–1546, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Gangstø et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Gangstø, R., Gehlen, M., Schneider, B., Bopp, L., Aumont, O., and Joos,
F.: Modeling the marine aragonite cycle: changes under rising carbon dioxide
and its role in shallow water CaCO<sub>3</sub> dissolution, Biogeosciences, 5,
1057–1072, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1057-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-5-1057-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Gehlen et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Gehlen, M., Bopp, L., Emprin, N., Aumont, O., Heinze, C., and Ragueneau, O.:
Reconciling surface ocean productivity, export fluxes and sediment
composition in a global biogeochemical ocean model, Biogeosciences, 3,
521–537, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-521-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-3-521-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Gelbard et al.(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
Gelbard, F., Tambour, Y., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Sectional representation for simulating aerosol dynamics,
J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 76,
541–556,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(80)90394-X" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0021-9797(80)90394-X</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Giering et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Giering, S. L. C., Sanders, R., Lampitt, R. S., Anderson, T. R., Tamburini, C., Boutrif, M., Zubkov, M. V., Marsay, C. M., Henson, S. A., Saw, K., Cook, K., and Mayor, D. J.:
Reconciliation of the carbon budget in the ocean's twilight zone,
Nature, 507,
480–483,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13123" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature13123</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Gillespie(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Gillespie, D. T.:
An Exact Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Coalescence Process in a Cloud,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
32,
1977–1989, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Gnanadesikan(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Gnanadesikan, A.:
A global model of silicon cycling: Sensitivity to eddy parameterization and dissolution,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13,
199–220, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Goldthwait et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Goldthwait, S., Yen, J., Brown, J., and Alldredge, A.:
Quantification of marine snow fragmentation by swimming euphausiids,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 49,
940–952, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Graham et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Graham, W. M., MacIntyre, S., and Alldredge, A. L.:
Diel variations of marine snow concentration in surface waters and implications for particle flux in the sea,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
47,
367–395, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Grossart and Ploug(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Grossart, H. P. and Ploug, H.:
Bacterial production and growth efficiencies: Direct measurements on riverine aggregates,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 45,
436–445, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Grossart and Ploug(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Grossart, H. P. and Ploug, H.:
Microbial degradation of organic carbon and nitrogen on diatom aggregates,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 46,
267–277, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Grossart et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Grossart, H. P., Hietanen, S., and Ploug, H.:
Microbial dynamics on diatom aggregates in Oresund, Denmark,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 249,
69–78, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Guidi et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Guidi, L., Stemmann, L., Jackson, G. A., Ibanez, F., Claustre, H., Legendre, L., Picheral, M., and Gorsky,  G.:
Effects of phytoplankton community on production, size and export of large aggregates: A world-ocean analysis,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54,
1951–1963, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Guidi et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Guidi, L., Legendre, L., Reygondeau, G., Uitz, J., Stemmann, L., and Henson, S. A.:
A new look at ocean carbon remineralization for estimating deepwater sequestration,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29,
1044–1059,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005063" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014GB005063</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Hedges and Keil(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I. and Keil, R. G.:
Sedimentary organic matter preservation: An assessment and speculative synthesis,
Mar. Chem., 49,
81–115, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Henson et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Henson, S. A., Sanders, R., and Madsen, E.:
Global patterns in efficiency of particulate organic carbon export and transfer to the deep ocean,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26,
GB1028,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004099" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011GB004099</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Honjo et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Honjo, S., Manganini, S. J., Krishfield, R. A., and Francois, R.:
Particulate organic carbon fluxes to the ocean interior and factors controlling the biological pump: A synthesis of global sediment trap programs since 1983,
Prog. Oceanogr.,
76,
217–285, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Huntsman and Barber(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Huntsman, S. A. and Barber, R. T.:
Primary production off northwest Africa: the relationship to wind and nutrient conditions,
Deep-Sea Res., 24,
25–33, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Jackson and Lochmann(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A. and Lochmann, S. E.:
Effect of coagulation on nutrient and light limitation of an algal bloom,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 37,
77–89, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Jackson(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A.:
Comparing observed changes in particle size spectra with those predicted using coagulation theory,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
159–184, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Jackson(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A.:
Using Fractal Scaling and Two-Dimensional Particle Size Spectra to Calculate Coagulation Rates for Heterogeneous Systems,
J. Colloid Interf. Sci.,
202,
20–29, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Jansen and Wolf-Gladrow(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Jansen, H. and Wolf-Gladrow, D. A.:
Carbonate dissolution in copepod guts: a numerical model,
Comparing observed changes in particle size spectra with those predicted using coagulation theory,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 221,
199–207, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Jokulsdottir(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Jokulsdottir, T.:
Sinking Biological Aggregates in the Ocean: A modelling study, PhD
dissertation,
University of Chicago,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Kahl et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Kahl, L. A., Vardi,  A., and Schofield, O.:
Effects of phytoplankton physiology on export flux,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 354,
3–19, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Kamatani(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Kamatani, A.:
Dissolution Rates of Silica from Diatoms Decomposing at Various Temperatures,
Mar. Biol., 68,
91–96, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Khelifa and Hill(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Khelifa, A. and Hill, P. S.:
Kinematic assessment of floc formation using a Monte Carlo model,
J. Hydrol. Res.,
44,
548–559, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Kiorboe(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kiorboe, T.: Colonization of Marine Snow Aggregates by Invertebrate Zooplankton: Abundance, Scaling, and Possible Role,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 45,
479–484, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Klaas and Archer(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Klaas, C. and Archer, D. E.:
Association of sinking organic matter with various types of mineral ballast in the deep sea: Implications for the rain ratio,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16,
1116
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001GB001765</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Krause et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Krause, J. W., Nelson, D. M., and Brzezinski, M. A.:
Biogenic silica production and the diatom contribution to primary production and nitrate uptake in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 58,
434–438, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Kriest and Evans(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I. and  Evans, G. T.:
A vertically resolved model for phytoplankton aggregation,
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Platet. Sci.), 109,
453–469, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Kwon et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y., Primeau, F., and Sarmiento, J. L.:
The impact of remineralization depth on the air-sea carbon balance,
Nat. Geosci., 2,
630–635, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Lam et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lam, P. J., Doney, S. C., and Bishop, J. K. B.:
The dynamic ocean biological pump: Insights from a global compilation of particulate organic carbon, CaCO<sub>3</sub>,
and opal concentration profiles from the mesopelagic, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
25, GB3009, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003868" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GB003868</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Lampitt et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Lampitt, R. S., Wishner, K. F., Turley  C. M., and Angel, M. V.:
Marine snow studies in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean: Distribution, composition and role as a food source for migrating plankton,
Mar. Biol.,
116,
689–702, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Lampitt et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Lampitt, R. S., Salter, I., de Cuevas, B. A., Hartman, S., Larkin, K. E., and Pebody, C. A.:
Long-term variability of downward particle flux in the deep northeast Atlantic: Causes and trends,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 57,
1346–1361, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Landry and Calbet(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Landry, M. R. and Calbet, A.:
Microzooplankton production in the oceans,
ICES, J. Mar. Sci., 61,
501–507, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Landry and Hassett(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Landry, M. R. and Hassett, R. P.:
Estimating the Grazing Impact of Marine Micro-zooplankton,
Mar. Biol., 67,
283–288, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Le Moigne et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Le Moigne, F. A. C., Gallinari, M., Laurenceau, E., and De La Rocha, C. L.:
Enhanced rates of particulate organic matter remineralization by
microzooplankton are diminished by added ballast minerals, Biogeosciences,
10, 5755–5765, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5755-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-5755-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Lewin(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewin, J. C.:
The dissolution of silica from diatom walls,
Geochim. Costmochim. Ac., 21,
182–198, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Li and Logan(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X. Y. and Logan, B. E.:
Size distributions and fractal properties of particles during a simulated phytoplankton bloom in a mesocosm,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
128–138, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Lima et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Lima, I. D., Lam, P. J., and Doney, S. C.: Dynamics of particulate organic
carbon flux in a global ocean model, Biogeosciences, 11, 1177–1198,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1177-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-11-1177-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Logan and Wilkinson(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Logan, B. E. and Wilkinson, D. B.:
Fractal goemetry of marine snow and other biological aggregates,
Limnol. Oceanogr.,
35,
130–136, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Logan et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Logan, B. E., Passow, U., Alldredge, A. L., Grossart, H.-P., and Simon, M.:
Rapid formation and sedimentation of large aggregates is predictable from
coagulation rates (half-lives) of transparent exoplolymer particles (TEP),
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42,
203–214, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Lutz et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Lutz, M. J., Dunbar, R. B., and Caldeira, K.: Regional variability in the
vertical flux of particulate organic carbon in the ocean interior, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 16,
1037,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001383" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2000GB001383</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Mari(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Mari, X.: Does ocean acidification induce an upward flux of marine
aggregates?, Biogeosciences, 5, 1023–1031, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1023-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-5-1023-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Marsay et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Marsay, C., Sanders, R., Henson, S., Pabortsava, K., Achterberg, E., and
Lampitt, R.: Attenuation of sinking particulate organic carbon flux through
the mesopelagic ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112, 1089–1094,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415311112" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1415311112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Martin et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.:
VERTEX: Carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific,
Deep-Sea Res., 34,
267–285, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Mayor et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Mayor, D. J., Sanders, R., Giering,  S. L. C., and Anderson, T. R.:
Microbial gardening in the ocean's twilight zone: Detritivorous metazoans benefit from fragmenting, rather than ingesting, sinking detritus,
Bioessays, 36,
1132–1137, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>McDonnell and Buesseler(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
McDonnell, A. M. P. and Buesseler, K. O.:
Variability in the average sinking velocity of marine particles,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 55,
2085–2096, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Middelburg(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Middelburg, J. J.:
A simple rate model for organic matter decomposition in marine sediments,
Geochim. Costmochim. Ac., 53,
1577–1581, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Milliman et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Milliman, J. D., Troy, P. J., Balch, W. M., Adams, A. K., Li, Y.-H., and Mackenzie, F. T.:
Biologically mediated dissolution of calcium carbonate above the chemical lysocline?,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 46,
1653–1669, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Najjar et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Najjar, R. G., Jin, X., Louanchi, F., Aumont, O., Caldeira, K., Doney, S. C.,
Dutay, J.-C., Follows, M., Gruber, N., Joos, F., Lindsay, K., Maier-Reimer,
E., Matear, R. J., Matsumoto, K., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A., Orr, J. C.,
Plattner, G.-K., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R. D., Weirig,
M.-F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.: Impact of circulation on export
production, dissolved organic matter, and dissolved oxygen in the ocean:
Results from Phase II of the Ocean Carbon-cycle Model Intercomparison Project
(OCMIP-2), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21,
GB3007,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002857" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GB002857</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Ormel and Spaans(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Ormel, C. W. and Spaans, M.: Monte Carlo Simulation of Particle Interactions
at high dynamic range: Advancing beyond the Googol, Astrophys. J., 684,
1291–1309, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Passow and Alldredge(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U. and Alldredge, A. L.:
Distribution, size and bacterial colonization of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the ocean,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
113,
185–198, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Passow and De La Rocha(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U. and De La Rocha, C. L.:
Accumulation of ballast on organic aggregates,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20,
GB1013,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002579" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005GB002579</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Passow et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U., De La Rocha, C. L., Fairfield, C., and Schmidt, K.:
Aggregation as a function of <i>P</i><sub>CO<msub level="3"><i/>2</msub></sub> and mineral particles,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 59,
532–547,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.2.0532" target="_blank">doi:10.4319/lo.2014.59.2.0532</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Ploug and Grossart(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H. and Grossart, H.-P.:
Bacterial growth and grazing on diatom aggregates: Respiratory carbon turnover as a function of aggregate size and sinking velocity,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 45,
1467–1475, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Ploug et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H., Iversen, M. H., and Fischer, G.:
Ballast, sinking velocity, and apparent diffusivity within marine snow and zooplankton fecal pellets: Implications for substrate turnover by attached bacteria,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 53,
1878–1886, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Pond et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Pond, D. W., Harris, R. P., and Brownlee, C.: A microinjection technique
using a pH sensitive dye to determine the gut pH of calanus-helgolandicus,
Mar. Biol., 123, 75–79, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Richardson et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, T. L., Jackson, G. A., Ducklow, H. W., and Roman, M. R.: Carbon
fluxes through food webs of the eastern equatorial Pacific: An inverse
approach,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
51,
1245–1274, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Richardson et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, K., Markager, S., Buch, E., Lassen, M. F., and Kristensen, A. S.:
Seasonal distribution of primary production, phytoplankton biomass and size distribution in the Greenland Sea,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
52,
979–999, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Riemer et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Riemer, N.,  West, M., Zaveri, R. A., and Easter, R. C.:
Simulating the evolution of soot mixing state with a particle-resolved aerosol model,
J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D09202,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011073" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD011073</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Riley et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Riley, J. S., Sanders, R., Marsay, C., Le Moigne, F. A. C., Achterberg, E. P., and Poulton, A. J.:
The relative contribution of fast and slow sinking particles to ocean carbon export,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26,
GB1026,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004085" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011GB004085</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Riser et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Riser, C. W., Wassmann, P., Reigstad, M., and Seuthe, L.:
Vertical flux regulation by zooplankton in the northern Barents Sea during Arctic spring,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55,
2320–2329, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Robinson et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, C., Steinberg, D. K., Anderson, T. R., Aristegui, J., Carlson, C.
A., Frost, J. R., Ghiglione, J.-F., Hernandez-Leon, S., Jackson, G. A.,
Koppelmann, R., Queguiner, B., Rageneau, O., Rassoulzadegan, F., Robinson, B.
H., Tamburini, C., Tanaka, T., Wishner, K. F., and Zhang, J.:
Mesopelagic zone ecology and biogeochemistry – a synthesis,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
57,
1504–1518, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Roullier et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Roullier, F., Berline, L., Guidi, L., Durrieu De Madron, X., Picheral, M.,
Sciandra, A., Pesant, S., and Stemmann, L.: Particle size distribution and
estimated carbon flux across the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone,
Biogeosciences, 11, 4541–4557, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4541-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-11-4541-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Ruiz(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Ruiz, J.:
What generates daily cycles of marine snow?,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
44,
1105–1126, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Saba et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Saba, V. S., Friedrichs, M. A. M., Carr, M. E., Antoine, D., Armstrong, R.
A., Asanuma, I., Aumont, O., Bates, N. R., Behrenfeld, M. J., Bennington, V.,
Bopp, L., Bruggeman, J., Buitenhuis, E. T., Church, M. J., Ciotti, A. M.,
Doney, S. C., Dowell, M., Dunne, J., Dutkiewicz, S., Gregg, W., Hoepffner,
N., Hyde, K. J. W., Ishizaka, J., Kameda, T., Karl, D. M., Lima, I., Lomas,
M. W., Marra, J., McKinley, G. A., Melin, F., Moore, J. K., Morel, A.,
OReilly, J., Salihoglu, B., Scardi, M., Smyth, T. J., Tang, S., Tjiputra, J.,
Uitz, J., Vichi, M., Waters, K., Westberry, T. K., and Yool, A.:
Challenges of modeling depth integrated marine primary productivity over multiple decades: A case study at BATS and HOT,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24,
GB3020,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003655" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GB003655</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Schneider et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, B., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.:
Assessing the sensitivity of modeled air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange to the remineralization depth of particulate organic and inorganic carbon,
Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
22,
GB3021,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003100" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GB003100</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Shima et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Shima, S., Kusano, K., Kawano, A., Sugiyama, T., and Kawahara, S.:
The super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: A particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non-hydrostatic model,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135,
1307–1320, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Small et al.(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Small, L. F., Fowler, S. W., and Unlu, M. Y.:
Sinking rates of natural copepod fecal pellets,
Mar. Biol., 51,
233–241, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Steinberg et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Steinberg, D. K., Van Mooy,  B. A. S., Buesseler, K. O., Boyd, P. W., Kobari, T., and Karl, D. M.:
Bacterial vs. zooplankton control of sinking particle flux in the ocean's twilight zone,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 53,
1327–1338, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Stemmann and Boss(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Stemmann, L. and Boss, E.:
Plankton and Particle Size and Packaging: From Determining Optical Properties to Driving the Biological Pump,
Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 4,
263–290,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100853" target="_blank">doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100853</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Stemmann et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Stemmann, L., Picheral, M., and Gorsky, G.:
Diel variation in the vertical distribution of particulate matter ( &gt;  0.15 mm) in the NW Mediterranean Sea investigated with the Underwater Video Profiler,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 47,
505–531, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Stemmann et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Stemmann, L., Jackson,  G. A., and Ianson, D.:
A vertical model of particle size distributions and fluxes in the midwater column that includes biological and physical processes – Part I: model formulation,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
51,
865–884, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Tande and Slagstad(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Tande, K. S. and Slagstad,  D.:
Assimilation efficiency in herbivorous aquatic organisms – The potential of the ratio method using l4C and biogenic silica as markers
Limnol. Oceanogr., 30,
1093–1099, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Trull et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Trull, T. W., Bray, S. G., Buesseler, K. O., Lamborg, C. H., Manganini, S., Moy, C., and Valdes, J.:
In situ measurements of mesopelagic particle sinking rates and the control of carbon transfer
to the ocean interior during the Vertical Flux in the Global Ocean (VERTIGO)
voyages in the North Pacific, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
55,
1684–1695,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.04.021" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.04.021</a>, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Verdugo et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Verdugo, P., Alldredge,  A. L., Azam, F., Kirchman, D. L., Passowa, U., and Santschi, P. H.:
The oceanic gel phase: a bridge in the DOM-POM continuum,
Mar. Chem.,
92,
67–85,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2004.06.017" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2004.06.017</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Westrich and Berner(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Westrich, J. T. and Berner,  R. A.:
The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: The G model tested,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 29,
236–249, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>Wetherill(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Wetherill, G. W.:
Comparison of Analytical and Physical Modeling of Planetesimal Accumulation,
Icarus, 88,
336–354, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>White(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
White, F. M.:
Viscous Fluid Flow,
McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>Zsom and Dullemond(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Zsom, A. and Dullemond, C. P.:
A representative particle approach to coagulation and fragmentation of dust aggregates and fluid droplets,
Astron. Astrophys., 489,
931–941,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200809921" target="_blank">doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809921</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
