<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-9-1361-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Oligomer formation in the troposphere: from experimental knowledge to 3-D
modeling</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Oligomer formation in the troposphere}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{V.~Lemaire et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lemaire</surname><given-names>Vincent</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Coll</surname><given-names>Isabelle</given-names></name>
          <email>isabelle.coll@lisa.u-pec.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Couvidat</surname><given-names>Florian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Mouchel-Vallon</surname><given-names>Camille</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Seigneur</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Siour</surname><given-names>Guillaume</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>LISA/IPSL, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques, UMR CNRS 7583,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC) et Université Paris Diderot (UPD), 94010 Créteil, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>INERIS, Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques, Parc technologique ALATA,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 60550 Verneuil en Halatte, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>CEREA, Joint Laboratory Ecole des Ponts ParisTech/EDF R&amp;D, Université Paris-Est (UPE),<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 77455 Marne la Vallée, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Isabelle Coll (isabelle.coll@lisa.u-pec.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>1361</fpage><lpage>1382</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The organic fraction of atmospheric aerosols has proven to be a critical
element of air quality and climate issues. However, its composition and the
aging processes it undergoes remain insufficiently understood. This work
builds on laboratory knowledge to simulate the formation of oligomers from
biogenic secondary organic aerosol (BSOA) in the troposphere at the
continental scale. We compare the results of two different modeling
approaches, a first-order kinetic process and a pH-dependent
parameterization, both implemented in the CHIMERE air quality model (AQM) (<uri>www.lmd.polytechnique.fr/chimere</uri>),
to simulate the spatial and temporal distribution of oligomerized secondary organic aerosol (SOA) over
western Europe. We also included a comparison of organic carbon (OC) concentrations at two EMEP (European Monitoring
and Evaluation Programme)
stations. Our results show that there is a strong dependence of the results
on the selected modeling approach: while the irreversible kinetic process
leads to the oligomerization of about 50 % of the total BSOA mass, the
pH-dependent approach shows a broader range of impacts, with a strong
dependency on environmental parameters (pH and nature of aerosol) and the
possibility for the process to be reversible. In parallel, we investigated
the sensitivity of each modeling approach to the representation of SOA
precursor solubility (Henry's law constant values). Finally, the pros and
cons of each approach for the representation of SOA aging are discussed and
recommendations are provided to improve current representations of oligomer
formation in AQMs.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Due to their fast evolution in the troposphere and their continuous
interaction with the ambient gas phase, atmospheric aerosols present a highly
variable chemical composition in space and time (Q. Zhang et al., 2007). They
not only
comprise large quantities of inorganic species such as nitrates and sulfates,
but also contain an organic fraction (organic aerosol, OA), made of
condensed semi-volatile and low volatility organic species presenting a wide
range of oxidation degrees (Jimenez et al., 2009). Part of this OA comes from
the emission of particulate organic compounds into the atmosphere during
combustion processes: it is called primary organic aerosol (POA). However,
away from combustion emission sources, most of the OA arises from the
oxidation of gas-phase organic species, making up the secondary organic
aerosol (SOA), which may represent up to 70 % of OA on a mass basis
(Kanakidou et al., 2005). The diversity in size and composition of
atmospheric aerosols induces major differences in their physicochemical
properties (Molnar and Meszaros, 2001; Kanakidou et al., 2005). These properties
affect their impact on the radiative balance of the atmosphere (Stier et al.,
2007; Paredes-Miranda et al., 2009) and their adverse health effects (Fuzzi
et al., 2006). Thus, not only the total aerosol mass, but also their size
distribution and their chemical content are of crucial importance for
atmospheric issues. Although major scientific advances have been made during
the last decade, the composition and the aging processes of the organic
aerosol fraction remain insufficiently understood (e.g., Volkamer et al.,
2006).</p>
      <p>As a consequence, air quality models (AQMs), despite significant progress,
still have difficulties to quantitatively reproduce the observed particulate
matter (PM) levels and gradients, and continue to underestimate the formation
of SOA in the troposphere, from cities to remote areas (Shrivastava et al.,
2011; Ervens et al., 2011; Petetin et al., 2014). In this regard, the
chemistry of organics in the aqueous condensed phase remains poorly
characterized. Thanks notably to atmospheric simulation chamber data, new
processes have been integrated into AQMs so as to fill the gap between models
and observations. These processes include, for example, the addition of new
precursors (e.g., Y. Zhang et al., 2007), the treatment of SOA hygroscopicity
(e.g., Pun, 2008) and aqueous chemistry SOA formation pathways (e.g., Carlton
et al., 2008). In doing so, oligomerization was highlighted as one of the
most important identified processes of SOA evolution. Laboratory studies
indeed showed that oligomerization could be a quantitatively important
evolution pathway for aqueous condensed species, and may greatly contribute
to a better understanding of SOA aging (e.g., Kalberer et al., 2004; Jang et
al., 2005; Trump and Donahue, 2014 and references therein). In particular,
modeling studies have shown that the oligomerization of biogenic oxidized
compounds happens to be a significant source of secondary organic aerosols
(Aksoyoglu et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>Based on these experimental results, two distinct approaches aiming at
representing oligomerization into AQMs have initially been developed. One
approach, described by Carlton et al. (2010), proposes to represent the
formation of oligomers observed in simulation chambers by using a
first-order rate constant for all organic compounds in the organic and
aqueous aerosol phases. In parallel, Pun and Seigneur (2007) developed a
pH-dependent oligomer formation, based on the experimental data of Jang et
al. (2005), which applies only to the aldehyde species dissolved in the
aerosol aqueous phase. Note that chemistry in cloud droplets is not
considered in our study. More recently, Trump and Donahue (2014) also used
an equilibrium approach to model oligomer formation within the
volatility basis set (VBS) formulation. Although these approaches rely on
two very different concepts, they both aim to produce oligomers in the
aerosol phase from the particle-phase reactions of condensed semi-volatile
organic species, using empirical relationships. These parameterizations have
been implemented in several AQMs such as CAMx (<uri>www.camx.com</uri>), CMAQ
(<uri>http://www.cmaq-model.org</uri>) and Polyphemus (<uri>http://cerea.enpc.fr/polyphemus/index.html</uri>) in order to improve the simulated SOA concentration
fields. Several modeling studies including these new parameterizations were
conducted (Pun and Seigneur, 2007; Carlton et al., 2010; Aksoyoglu et al.,
2011; Couvidat et al., 2012); it came out that oligomerization of biogenic
oxidation products is mostly responsible for SOA formation and that the
implementation of this process in AQMs reduces the discrepancy between the
PM simulated mass and measurements in Europe and North America. However,
although enhanced operational SOA modeling is needed, there still are no in situ
measurements of oligomers that would increase our understanding of their
formation and either allow the validation of these approaches or enable
further refinement of the models. As an example, Pun and Seigneur (2007)
indicated that their approach may overestimate the role of water in this
process, as it is not currently known whether all liquid water present in
aerosols is available to interact with organic compounds. Furthermore, as
the two methods diverge both on the set of species submitted to
oligomerization and on the nature of the driving parameters (kinetic
constant versus equilibrium relationship), we also can expect the modeled
distribution of simulated oligomers to differ between the two approaches.</p>
      <p>To our knowledge, these approaches have not yet been compared in a same
model. Such an initiative seems warranted, first not only to identify the range of
uncertainties that these two parameterizations induce in the model outputs,
but also to define how these parameterizations influence our understanding
of SOA production in time and space. Thus, this work aims at investigating
the representation of oligomerization that is provided by operational
models. It consists in a model sensitivity study using, in turn, each
oligomerization approach presented above to quantify the production of
organic PM over Europe in the lower troposphere through continuous
simulation. Moreover, it includes a study of the impact of the Henry's law
constant computation for complex organic species, which is considered as a
key parameter in representing the multiphase behavior of organic compounds
in the atmosphere (Raventos-Duran et al., 2010). This study was conducted with the
CHIMERE AQM (<uri>www.lmd.polytechnique.fr/chimere</uri>) at the continental scale over Europe during a summer period
covering July and August 2006. The simulated SOA yields, as well as the
oligomer spatial and temporal distribution, obtained in each model
configuration are compared so as to learn about the corresponding
approaches.</p>
      <p>This work is divided into three parts. First, the methodology and the model
configurations are presented. Next the influence of the Henry' law constant
on gas-particle partitioning, as well as the impact of each parameterization
on the SOA budget are discussed and are compared against field measurements.
Finally, we discuss the assets and limitations of both oligomer modeling
approaches and provide recommendations for future work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methodology and model setup</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Model setup</title>
      <p>This study uses the CHIMERE AQM, which is designed to produce daily forecasts
of ozone, PM and other pollutants and to conduct pollution event analyses
and research studies in atmospheric chemistry (Menut et al., 2013). The
model may be run from the regional to the continental scale, with horizontal
resolutions ranging from 1 to 100 km. CHIMERE is used daily for operational
air quality forecasts in nine different regions of France and Europe. In this
context, model performance is assessed every day via the comparison of the
model output with atmospheric measurements, which also provides the basis
for the ongoing improvement of CHIMERE. CHIMERE uses the MELCHIOR2 gas-phase
chemical scheme (120 reactions among 44 gaseous species), which is adapted
from the original EMEP (European Monitoring
and Evaluation Programme) mechanism and is a reduced version of the MELCHIOR1
mechanism, obtained by Carter's surrogate molecule method (Carter, 1990).
The gas-phase chemical mechanism for SOA production has been described in
detail by Pun et al. (2006) and Bessagnet et al. (2008).</p>
      <p>In CHIMERE, a sectional aerosol module provides the evolution of the
concentrations of seven particulate groups of species: primary PM, nitrate,
sulfate, ammonium, biogenic SOA, anthropogenic SOA and water (Schmidt et
al., 2001; Bessagnet et al., 2004, 2009). The size distribution of aerosol
particles is represented using eight size sections ranging from 10 nm to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Physical processes taken into account are coagulation (Gelbard
and Seinfeld, 1980), condensation via absorption (Nenes et al., 1998; Pun et
al., 2006) and nucleation for sulfuric acid (Kulmala et al., 1998). The
equilibrium concentrations of inorganic species are computed by the
thermodynamic module ISORROPIA (<uri>http://nenes.eas.gatech.edu/ISORROPIA</uri>) (version 1.7) presented in Nenes et al. (1998). The distribution of secondary organic species between the gas and
particulate phases is calculated using Raoult's law with a
temperature-dependent partitioning coefficient as described by Pankow (1994)
for hydrophobic species and using Henry's law for hydrophilic species (Pun
et al., 2006). In this version of the CHIMERE model, SOA formation is
processed through the oxidation of five biogenic gaseous precursor species
(isoprene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, limonene and ocimene) and four anthropogenic precursor species (benzene, toluene, trimethylbenzene and a
species accounting for C4–C10 alkanes). As for condensable species, both
hydrophilic (condensation following Henry's law) and hydrophobic
(condensation following Raoult's law) behaviors are considered, they are
represented by
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p>six hydrophilic surrogate species including an anthropogenic
non-dissociative species (AnA0D), an anthropogenic once-dissociative species
(AnA1D), an anthropogenic twice-dissociative species (AnA2D), a biogenic
non-dissociative species (BiA0D), a biogenic once-dissociative species
(BiA1D) and a biogenic twice-dissociative species (BiA2D). The pAnA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D and
pBiA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D species stand for the part of the surrogate species that is present
in the particulate phase;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>three hydrophobic species comprising two anthropogenic species with low and
moderate saturation vapor pressures (AnBlP and AnBmP) and a biogenic species
with a moderate saturation vapor pressure (BiBmP);</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>two water-soluble surrogate species that account for the isoprene oxidation
products (ISOPA1, ISOPA2). The oxidation of isoprene is adapted from the
formulation prescribed by Kroll et al. (2006) and Y. Zhang et al. (2007).</p></list-item></list>
Note that if – for any time step and grid cell – the modeled aerosol is not
deliquescent, the gas–aerosol partition of the hydrophilic species will then
be driven by their saturation vapor pressure. That is, their condensation
will follow Raoult's law.</p>
      <p>In the model, horizontal advection is calculated using the Van
Leer second-order
scheme and boundary layer turbulence is represented as a diffusion
phenomenon, following Troen and Mahrt (1986). Vertical winds are diagnosed
through a bottom-up mass balance scheme. Dry deposition is coded as in
Wesely (1989) and photolytic rates are attenuated using liquid water or
relative humidity. Finally, the numerical time solver uses the TWOSTEP method
(Verwer, 1994).</p>
      <p>The 2006 annual anthropogenic emissions from the EMEP database (Vestreng et
al., 2005) at a resolution of 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> have been
used (<uri>http://www.emep.int</uri>). They include CO, NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMVOC, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM emissions for the 10 anthropogenic activity sectors of the Selected Nomenclature for Air Pollution
(SNAP). The emission values are disaggregated into
individual chemical species and at an hourly time step according to IER recommendations, and are spatially distributed over our simulation
domain using a kilometric land use database
(<uri>http://www.glcf.umiacs.umd.edu</uri>).
Biogenic emissions have been computed with the MEGAN model (Guenther et al.,
2006) using a land use database of 1 km resolution and hourly meteorological
parameters from the MM5 model (see below) for
the calculation of the various biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC)
emission flux intensity and temporal evolution
(<uri>http://lar.wsu.edu/megan/</uri>).
Climatologic LMDZ (Hauglustaine et al., 2004)
model output data were used for boundary conditions. Finally, the mesoscale
model MM5 (Dudhia, 1993) was used to
generate hourly meteorological fields for CHIMERE over a European domain
covering our simulation domain, with a horizontal resolution of 54 km and
using 32 levels in the vertical direction from the surface to 10 hPa.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>In red, gridded domain used for the air quality simulations, having
a horizontal resolution of 0.23<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In black,
large-scale domain used to provide boundary conditions (horizontal resolution
of 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>A European domain extending from 6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E in
longitude and from 38<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 54<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in latitude (see
Fig. 1) was defined for this study: its size allows for tracking and studying
large European city plumes and the domain includes our study area, which is
western Europe. The horizontal resolution is 0.23<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the vertical resolution, we used eight levels of
decreasing resolution from the ground level up to 500 hPa, the first model
layer being 50 m thick. The simulation domain and its grid are illustrated
in Fig. 1. The simulation period covers 2 months (July and August) in
the summer of 2006. The simulation was run with a spin-up period (15 days)
prior to the periods of interest in order to ensure that emissions and
secondary pollutants are realistically distributed over the domain at the
beginning of the evaluation period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Oligomer parameterizations</title>
      <p>This section describes the implementation of oligomer production in CHIMERE
using the two existing parameterizations and their associated hypotheses.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Kinetic approach</title>
      <p>The first approach (called hereafter KIN) is based on the hypothesis that
oligomer formation may be represented through a kinetic process (Morris et
al., 2006; Carlton et al., 2010). This hypothesis is supported by a series of
smog chamber experiments conducted by Kalberer et al. (2004), where an
important fraction of organic aerosol mass was shown to be composed of
oligomers. The authors reported that, after 20 h of processing, 50 % of
the total organic aerosol mass was transformed into oligomers. From this
result, Morris et al. (2006) proposed the use of a first-order rate constant
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to account for the oligomerization
formation process, corresponding to a half-life of 20 h for organic species
in the particulate phase. In this approach, biogenic and anthropogenic
species are all potential oligomer precursors. However, due to low amounts of
anthropogenic semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC) from the oxidation of classic precursors (Toluene,
Xylene, Trimethylbenzene, etc.) over Europe, the production of anthropogenic
oligomer could be negligible (Aksoyoglu et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>To transcribe this approach in the model, we have allocated a first-order
oligomer production kinetics to all the hydrophobic and hydrophilic
surrogate species (AnA0-1-2D and BiA0-1-2D, AnBlP, AnBmP, BiBmP,
ISOPA1 and ISOPA2) of the CHIMERE aerosol module. Preliminary simulations
with CHIMERE confirmed the precedent findings, i.e., a very low budget of
oligomers of anthropogenic origin (concentrations reach 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ng m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the maximum over the domain) compared with biogenic oligomers
(which concentrations reach a few <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for oligomers over
many continental areas).</p>
      <p>Thus, for simplification, only the six biogenic surrogate species (BiA0D,
BiA1D, BiA2D, BiBmP, ISOPA1 and ISOPA2) were considered here (Gas-phase
chemical scheme for SOA formation is available in Table 6 of Menut et al.,
2013). Furthermore, as will be discussed below, our study will focus on
monoterpenes, a common species of both modeling approaches. To that end, a
new species family called BiOLG, representing the total sum of oligomerized
pBiA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D compounds, was introduced in CHIMERE. It accounts for oligomer
formation from the oxidation of monoterpenes only and will be the basis for
the intercomparison of the two approaches.</p>
      <p>In this empirical parameterization, oligomerization is considered as an
irreversible process. This approach has the advantage of simplicity, as it
proposes a similar chemical reactivity for all organic oligomer precursors
in the particulate phase (hydrophilic and hydrophobic species), one single
chemical pathway for oligomer formation, and only one type of oligomer
product. However, the drawback of this method is that it does not account
for the details of the gas-phase SVOC speciation, for the variability of the
aerosol nature (deliquescent aerosol or not), nor for ambient parameters
such as pH. Thus, it may lead to biases in the quantitative estimation of
oligomer and OA production. Moreover, owing to the choice of a kinetic
approach with a half life of 20 h, oligomer production is expected to be
dominant away from source areas (except in the presence of severe
anticyclonic conditions), enhancing the role of pollutant transport.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>pH-dependant approach</title>
      <p>The second approach (called here KPH) combines the laboratory works of Jang
et al. (2005) – who showed that the polymerization of aldehydes may happen
through a variety of acid-catalyzed reactions – and the observations of Gao
et al. (2004) – who indicated that at least 10 % of the total organic
aerosol mass is converted into oligomers due to the formation of organic
acids in the aerosol. From these results, Pun and Seigneur (2007) developed
an equation for the calculation of the gas-to-particle partitioning constant
of semi-volatile aldehydes. It represents their increased partitioning
toward the aqueous phase due to acidity:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn>1.91</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective partitioning coefficient of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th compound between the gas phase and the aerosol aqueous phase;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is its standard partitioning coefficient – calculated for
non-acidic conditions – and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the aqueous concentration of
hydronium ions. In this approach, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the value of 0.1 found
by Gao et al. (2004) under the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. According to the
results of Jang et al. (2005), aldehydes appear to be more reactive than
ketones by 2 orders of magnitude. To simplify the parameterization, Pun
and Seigneur (2007) considered as a first approximation that only aqueous
aldehydes undergo oligomerization. In our model, it is equivalent to
assuming that only BiA0D surrogates can lead to oligomer formation. Such a
consideration derives from the fact that isoprene oxidation products in
CHIMERE are not associated with a given molecular structure. Thus,
oligomerization processes could not be attributed to isoprene surrogates
without more chemical details here, using the KPH approach. Our study then
focuses on what can be learned from oligomerization modeling approaches on
the basis of monoterpene surrogate reactivity.</p>
      <p>The KPH approach only artificially reproduces oligomer production. Indeed,
the reactivity in the particulate phase that leads to the consumption of
dissolved organic species it restituted by an increase in the value of their
effective partitioning coefficient, according to Eq. (1). As a
consequence, oligomerization is treated here as a fully reversible process.
Furthermore, this approach does not require any new model species to
represent the aqueous oligomers. This is why it is necessary to perform two
types of simulations to estimate the effect of the oligomerization process:
a reference case – called hereafter REF – and a scenario case (KPH). The
differences in the pBiA0D concentration fields between the two simulations
represent aqueous oligomerization in the KPH approach:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Oligomers</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pBiA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">KPH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pBiA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">REF</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            To implement this approach in the model and ensure the robustness of the
modified partitioning constant value, it was necessary to adequately account
for the acidity of the deliquescent particles. The particle pH is calculated
in CHIMERE by an online coupling with the ISORROPIA model that solves the transition between solid and aqueous phases through the
estimation of the deliquescent relative humidity. However, it is also
possible to run ISORROPIA in a metastable configuration, which considers
that aerosols remain in a liquid state under conditions of low relative
humidity, thus avoiding the transfer of dissolved BiA0D back to the gas
phase and favoring oligomer persistence as well as its atmospheric
transport. This alternative is taken into account for the evaluation of the
KPH approach.</p>
      <p>ISORROPIA model also provides – for each cell and at every time step of the
model calculation – particle water content and ion species equilibrium
concentrations. At the end of the ISORROPIA computation, we constrained the
particle pH to a range of values between 2 and 6. The upper value limit of 6
allows us to be consistent with the parameterization and to avoid
partitioning constant values lower than that of the reference (see Eq. 1). The lower limit was set for numerical reasons, as the transfer of the
concerned organic species to the aqueous phase becomes total under a pH of
2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Properties of the biogenic hydrophilic and hydrophobic surrogate SOA
species used in the simulations conducted with the CHIMERE model.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surrogate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Molecular</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Molar mass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Henry's law constant<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Saturation vapor</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Considered</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Considered</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">structure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(g mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 298 K)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pressure<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (atm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">in KIN<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">in KPH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BiA0D</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pinonaldehyde</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">168</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Yes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BiA1D</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Norpinic acid</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">170</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BiA2D</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pinic acid</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">186</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BiBmP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C15 oxo aldehyde</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">236</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The Henry's law constants are calculated with the
group contribution approach, GROMHE. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pun et al. (2006).
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Surrogate undergoing oligomerization.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Module implementation</title>
      <p>As mentioned in the previous section, isoprene oxidation products could not
be considered as oligomer precursors in the pH-dependent approach, due to the
absence of structural information on these species in the gaseous chemical
scheme. A refined chemical scheme for isoprene oxidation in CHIMERE is under development (Couvidat
and Seigneur, 2011) and will be included later in the model. Pending this
future model development, we focus here on a comparative evaluation of
oligomerization of monoterpene oxidation products using the two
parameterizations described above. Nevertheless, the absence of molecular
structure allocation for ISOPA1 and ISOPA2 (model oxidation products of
isoprene) is not a limiting factor for the kinetic approach. Thus,
considerations for the relative importance of kinetic oligomer production
from monoterpenes and isoprene will be presented in Sect. 3.</p>
      <p>One important issue in SOA production is the influence of the gas-particle
partition of semi-volatile species on the final model results, whether under
dry or wet conditions. However, since this work focuses on the reactivity of
hydrophilic compounds, we specifically addressed the issue of Henry's
constant values, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By affecting the fraction of the semi-volatile
species that partition into the aqueous phase, this constant directly
impacts the quantitative production of the organic aerosol fraction.
Furthermore, the reliability of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values is known to be low for
complex compounds of atmospheric interest, especially for highly soluble
species (Raventos-Duran et al., 2010). In order to observe the effect of refining
these values in the different approaches, we ran the model with different
sets of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. To that end, the group contribution method of Suzuki
et al. (1992) that is used by default in CHIMERE to produce <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
at 298 K was replaced by the GROMHE group contribution approach. This method
was developed by Raventos-Duran et al. (2010). It is based on the molecular
structure and was shown to be more reliable than the standard methods for
the complex organic compounds of atmospheric interest. In this context, an
issue that must be addressed is that of the ideality of aqueous solutions.
Indeed, due to the presence of inorganic salts at high concentrations, it is
highly probable that the aqueous aerosol phase is non-ideal, which may
affect Henry's law constants by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude. This
phenomenon can be taken into account using Setschenow coefficients (Wang et
al., 2015). However, figuring out the existing uncertainty on the aerosol
aqueous-phase composition, and the fact that the uncertainty in the
estimation of Henry's law constants using the group contribution approach
may be about at least 1 order of magnitude (Raventos-Duran et al., 2010), we
have considered that the correction brought by Setschenow coefficients would
have a second-order effect, most probably poorly controlled due to the lack
of accuracy on the aqueous-phase description and the margin of uncertainty
on the coefficients themselves. This is why we did not include a
non-ideality correction in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evaluation process. In any case, the
sensitivity tests that we conducted during these works will allow us to
assess the necessary degree of sophistication on Henry's law constant
values, and to identify areas for improvement.</p>
      <p>By default, the molecular structure selected for BiA0D in CHIMERE is that of
pinonaldehyde, a 10-carbon-atom molecule with an oxo group and an aldehyde
group, while BiA1D and BiA2D are respectively based on norpinic acid
(9-carbon-atom molecule with a carboxy group and an oxo group) and on pinic
acid (9-carbon-atom molecule with two carboxy groups). Table 1 summarizes
the default structure properties and molar masses, as well as the
partitioning and saturation pressure characteristics used in CHIMERE for the
three hydrophilic surrogates that lead to oligomer production from monoterpenes.</p>
      <p>In order to evaluate the importance of considering a given molecular
structure for each of these surrogate species, we computed different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values for them, corresponding to the different molecular structures they
implicitly account for. The importance of investigating <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for
our study is demonstrated in Sect. 3.1.1. Then, following the
discussion of the results of the standard oligomerization approaches, we
will discuss the results of additional oligomerization simulations conducted
using a range of possible <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. These sensitivity tests are
presented in detail in Sect. 3.2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Mass concentration fields of BiA0D <bold>(a, b)</bold>, BiA1D
<bold>(c, d)</bold>, BiA2D <bold>(e, f)</bold> and BiBmP <bold>(g, h)</bold> in the gas
(left) and particulate (right) phases, modeled by CHIMERE and averaged over
20 July–3 August 2006.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Model approaches for oligomer formation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Precursor partitioning in the reference case</title>
      <p>In order to examine the gas-particle partition of the model surrogates, we
report in Fig. 2 the average concentration fields of the hydrophilic and
hydrophobic surrogates simulated by CHIMERE in the reference case for the
period 20 July–3 August 2006. This figure indicates that BiA1D is the
highest hydrophilic contributor to the organic aerosol mass concentration,
while BiA0D remains quasi-exclusively in the gas phase. However, among the
monoterpene surrogates, the hydrophobic species BiBmP is the largest
contributor to the organic aerosol mass concentration. On average,
hydrophilic and hydrophobic species account for 25 and 75 % of this
organic aerosol mass concentration, respectively.</p>
      <p>As the impact of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning constant value is likely to be
important for the formation of oligomers, we focused on gaseous hydrophilic
species and on the processes governing their transfer toward the particulate
phase. To that end, we analyzed two different situations. In the first one,
the aerosol is treated as a deliquescent aerosol where the distribution of
the hydrophilic species between the gas and the condensed phases is driven
by Henry's law. In the second one, we consider a dry aerosol where the
partition of hydrophilic species is driven by Raoult's law.</p>
      <p>For the deliquescent aerosol situation, we calculated the partitioning
coefficient as described by Mouchel-Vallon et al. (2013), where the fraction
of the surrogate species in the aqueous phase is obtained as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>In this equation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represent (in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) the concentration of species <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
particulate and gas phases, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Henry's law constant
(in Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ideal gas law constant; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature;
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the liquid water content (LWC) of the aerosol (in cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> liquid
water per cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> air). We set the liquid water content value within the
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> range of values proposed by Engelhart et al. (2011)
for a deliquescent aerosol.</p>
      <p>For a dry aerosol we used an equation similar to Eq. (3), which has
been shown to apply equally to the organic compounds that condense into an
organic phase (Eq. 4) (e.g., Donahue et al., 2009; Valorso et al., 2011).
There, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the mean organic aerosol molar mass (set to 250 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on Robinson et al., 2007), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the total
organic aerosol mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
saturation vapor pressure (atm) and considering an ideal mixture.
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Figure 3 illustrates the gas-particle partition of the three semi-volatile
compounds considered in our work for the two distinct situations. The
fraction of the compound present in the particulate phase (represented by
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values) is plotted as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a deliquescent
aerosol under typical atmospheric liquid water content situations (upper
graph), and as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the case of a dry organic aerosol
with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranging from low (0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to high (10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) atmospheric concentrations (lower graph). This figure shows how
the magnitude of the condensation process increases with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value
(Fig. 3a) and decreases with the saturation vapor pressure (Fig. 3b). To
analyze these results, each graph can be split into three parts.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Particulate fraction as a function of Henry's law constant <bold>(a)</bold> and as a function of saturation vapor pressure <bold>(b)</bold>. The
partition of each surrogate is represented by the colored dots for different
conditions of organic aerosol mass concentration. Shaded areas represent the
range of typical atmospheric condition.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>For deliquescent aerosols:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p>When the Henry's law constant value is lower than 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (part I)
or greater than 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (part III), considering the
selected range of LWC values, the equilibrium is either in favor of the gas
phase (part I, not significantly present in the aqueous phase) or in favor
of the particulate phase (part III, highly soluble compounds), respectively.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>For intermediate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (part II), the mass of the semi-volatile
species is shared between the two phases. In this area, partitioning towards
the aqueous phase is an increasing function of LWC values.</p></list-item></list>
Similarly, for dry aerosols:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p>The partition is completely in favor of the aerosol phase (low volatility
compounds – part 1) or towards the gas phase (volatile compounds – part 3)
whether the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for saturation vapor pressures are lower than
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> atm or greater than 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> atm, respectively.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>For intermediate values (part 2, shaded area), partitioning towards the
condensed phase increases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list>
The main conclusions that can be drawn from these graphs are the following.
First, over this set of atmospheric situations, and whatever the nature of
the aerosol – BiA0D never contributes significantly to OA formation. Indeed,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BiA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values reach a maximum of 0.3 % in the most
favorable combination (dry aerosol, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Second, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BiA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BiA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values respectively range from 1.7 to 14.4 % and
from 1.5 to 12.9 % for a deliquescent aerosol, and span the
3.3–77.4 % and the 4.9–83.9 % ranges in the presence of a dry
aerosol. Thus, BiA1D and BiA2D are likely to sweep a wide range of
partitioning states in the presence of a dry aerosol, while their
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value are too low to account for a substantial transfer to the
aqueous aerosol phase in the presence of a deliquescent aerosol. One should
note, however, that in the dry aerosol model (Eq. 4), the activity
coefficients are assumed to be unity; in other words, one does not account
for interactions among organic species. Since hydrophobic and hydrophilic
species have significantly different molecular structures, one could
anticipate that including the activity coefficients in the model would reduce
the absorption of the hydrophilic species in the hydrophobic organic phase or
even lead to the formation of a separate organic phase (Couvidat and
Sartelet, 2015). Therefore, the values given for the partition of hydrophilic
aerosol should be seen as upper limits. Considering those two elements,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appears to be an influential parameter for BiA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D
species, its modulation – with regard to the effective solubility of the
surrogates – being likely to strongly enhance the oligomer production
efficiency when the aerosol is deliquescent and when the residual gas
fraction of the surrogate is not negligible. A species such as BiA0D, which
currently remains mostly gaseous in the standard version of the model, may
thus be particularly sensitive to the reference value of its Henry's law
partitioning constant.</p>
      <p>It is thus important to determine how uncertainties in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value
influence the results and efficiency of the two oligomer production
approaches. For this purpose, we conducted sensitivity tests to the
refinement of the most uncertain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, taking into account the
structure of the model species and of its components.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Oligomer production from the oxidation of monoterpenes</title>
      <p>CHIMERE simulations were launched in the reference, KIN, and KPH
configurations (both modes) for the two periods of interest defined above.
The quantitative differences in the concentrations of the simulated biogenic
oligomers, as well as their spatial and temporal features, were
investigated. As mentioned previously, we focused on the comparison between
the BiOLG (KIN approach) and the pBiA0D<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>KPH – REFERENCE</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (KPH
approaches) concentration fields.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Oligomer daily maxima modeled with the two modeling approaches,
using three different CHIMERE configurations for oligomer formation:
KIN <bold>(a)</bold>, KPH deliquescent <bold>(b)</bold> and KPH
metastable <bold>(c)</bold> for 24 July 2006.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Figure 4 presents the oligomer daily concentration maxima simulated by
CHIMERE from the oxidation of monoterpenes for both parameterizations and
for 1 representative day of the simulated period. It highlights large
differences in the oligomer concentration fields produced in each approach,
both in terms of intensity and spatial distribution. Indeed we can see that,
using the KIN approach, the highest oligomer concentrations reach about 0.80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over southeastern Europe (Fig. 4a) while in both KPH
configurations the peak values are highly localized (not necessary in the
same areas according to the mode used) and may exceed 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 4b and c), with local peaks around 1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (not
visible on the color scale). The same divergences between the KIN and the
KPH model configurations are observed for every day of the summer period,
with daily concentration maxima spanning the 0.30–1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the 0.80–2.50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges, respectively. In terms of hourly
peaks, we can learn from the KPH results that there are areas of high
gaseous precursor concentrations where BiA0D solubility is (at least
transiently) strongly enhanced by local reductions in pH. According to
Fig. 3 the decline in pH has to be greater than 3 or 4 units, with regard
to the reference value of 6, so as to increase the BiA0D partitioning
constant by several orders of magnitude and allow the massive transfer of
the species to the particulate phase. Such conditions appear to be met off
the eastern Italian and notably over well-delimited forested continental areas of
northern Spain. From the elevated peak values, it seems likely that
the formation of oligomers proceeds by rapid changes in the BiA0D
partitioning. In return, the inhomogeneity of oligomer concentration fields
suggests a recurring evaporation of the particulate aerosol component in the
deliquescent mode and/or the instability of low pH values. As for the KIN
approach, we can see that the time required for the kinetic process, as well
as the irreversible nature of the coded process, allows for the presence of large
regional oligomer plumes with smooth concentration gradients, as well as the
presence of significant numbers of this species over the entire domain.</p>
      <p>When averaging our results over the whole summer period, we observe no
significant change in the location of high oligomer concentrations, though
concentration values are logically lower than hourly peaks, and
concentration fields show smoother gradients (Fig. 5). However what is
interesting is that the quantitative trends differ from those predicted
previously. Indeed, the KIN parameterization produces the highest average
oligomer concentrations that range from 0.1 to 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
most of the simulation domain. This approach forms well-mixed secondary
plumes similar to those of other long-lived atmospheric oxidants such as
ozone, with maxima over central Europe and Mediterranean areas. On the
contrary, KPH oligomers only slightly exceed 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (in both
deliquescent and metastable modes), except over small regions of the
Adriatic Sea and over northern Spain areas where they reach a value 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the deliquescent mode. It is noticeable that, due to
the persistence of an aqueous phase, the metastable mode produces higher
oligomer concentrations over the entire domain. However, the difference
remains moderate in terms of absolute mass concentration. This feature
confirms the lack of oligomer mass accumulation in the KPH approach that was
observed in the spatial analysis of hourly maps. It indicates that, beyond
the question of relative humidity, favorable conditions for oligomers
production in the KPH approach are not often met along time. The conditions
of the process reversibility thus have to be more precisely identified and
understood, for both modes of this approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Driving parameters of both approaches</title>
      <p>We explored these differences in order to identify the parameters driving
production, transport and decomposition of oligomers over continental areas
for both approaches. First, the parameters describing the aerosol properties
together with the BiA0D partition were plotted over the domain and analyzed
for a given time step of the simulation. Then we investigated the temporal
evolution of the BiA0D partition and oligomer formation at one grid point of
the domain in the three CHIMERE configurations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average modeled oligomer concentration fields from monoterpenes in
the KIN <bold>(a)</bold> and KPH configurations considering both
deliquescent <bold>(b)</bold> and metastable mode <bold>(c)</bold> for the period of
20 July–3 August 2006.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>CHIMERE results for 24 July 2006 at 05:00 UTC: nature (humid or
dry) of the aerosol <bold>(a)</bold>, pH of the aqueous phase <bold>(b)</bold>; BiA0D
precursor concentration fields in the gas phase for the reference simulation
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(c)</bold> and oligomer concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(d)</bold> obtained with the KPH approach.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Figure 6 presents the nature (humid or dry) and the pH of the aerosol
simulated over Europe for 24 July 2006 at 05:00 UTC, in relation to BiA0D
concentration fields. The similarity of the aerosol type (dry or humid,
Fig. 6a) determined by ISORROPIA and of the oligomer concentration fields
(Fig. 6d) indicates that the existence of a deliquescent aerosol is not
ensured in all grid cells and proves to be a discriminatory parameter for
oligomer production in the simulations. Figure 6 also emphasizes the role of
pH in this process. In northern Spain, significant oligomer formation is
observed in the presence of both a wet aerosol and a very acidic aqueous
phase (pH around 2.5), although this is not a region where the
concentrations of BiA0D are high. On the contrary, over Great Britain, where
there is no significant oligomer formation, CHIMERE predicts the presence of
a deliquescent aerosol, low gaseous BiA0D concentrations and a pH value
around 4. These results place the pH threshold for a significant oligomer
production from BiA0D at a value comprised between 3 and 4. Our previous
calculations indicate that the fraction of BiA0D in the aerosol phase
remains lower than 1 % for a pH of 4, but reaches up to 6–39 % for
a pH of 3, considering a LWC in the 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> range
(cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> water cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This exponential relationship supports the local
formation of high oligomers concentration peaks in Fig. 6d, with
regards to the conditions shown in Fig. 6a and b. Clearly, although
the presence of the precursor is the first requirement for oligomer
production, it is not a determining parameter of the structure of oligomer
concentration fields. As the modeled pH strongly impacts the rate and the
intensity of oligomer formation, its robustness was questioned. Although no
direct measurements of the pH of the aerosol have been realized yet, our
calculations are consistent with previous experimental studies reporting
strongly acidic fine particles (Ludwig and Klemm, 1990; Herrmann, 2003;
Keene et al., 2004). Our results are also consistent with the work of Xue et
al. (2011), which is based on chemical composition and meteorological data
collected at a suburban site in Hong Kong and which estimated the aerosol pH
to range between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.87 and 3.12. Despite the uncertainty that cannot be
fully removed on the modeled pH value, we did not consider necessary to run
other assessment methods, on the basis of the recent works of Henningan et
al. (2015), who affirm that thermodynamic models like ISORROPIA are more
adapted to estimate the aerosol pH than proxy methods such as the ones using
ion balance and ratios.</p>
      <p>In order to address the temporal variation of the aerosol properties related
to oligomer formation, concentration time series for BiA0D (reference
simulation – blue line) and for oligomers (KIN approach – red line, KPH
approach – green line for the deliquescent mode, black line for the
metastable mode) have been plotted in Fig. 7 for a given grid cell in
northern Spain for the period from 20 to 24 July.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of BiA0D concentrations (ppb) in the reference
simulation (blue line), the KIN (red line) oligomer concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the KPH oligomer concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the deliquescent mode (green line) and in the
metastable mode (black line), as simulated with CHIMERE for the 20–24 July
2006 period in northern Spain. The shaded areas correspond to the presence of
a dry aerosol in the deliquescent configuration.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In the KIN approach, BiOLG progressively accumulates in the air mass and
shows a smoothed concentration curve along time. Furthermore, oligomer
concentrations are not strongly correlated with the presence of gaseous
precursors due to the time required for the kinetic formation process. In
the KPH approach, oligomer concentrations are highly variable, showing
intense peaks that alternate with periods of near-zero content in the
particle phase. It is noted that the black curve (KPH, metastable mode)
presents high values on 22 and 23 July that are not observed for the results
of the deliquescent mode. These events are neither correlated with a
specific origin of the air mass (analysis not shown here) nor with a given
BiA0D concentration threshold, but both take place during shaded periods and
can therefore be attributed to the limiting effect of a dry aerosol in the
deliquescent mode. However, from the co-variability of pBiA0D concentrations
in shaded and non-shaded areas, it appears that the existence of a
deliquescent aerosol is not the only driving parameter of this
formation/evaporation cycle. Indeed, sharp decreases in the particulate
fraction of BiA0D are simultaneously observed whatever the aerosol physic
state (see 21–22 and 24 July for instance), which implies that pH
variability also plays a decisive role in the calculations, during a large
part of the day. During these periods, the pH value was indeed comprised between 4
and 6, thus being the principal limitation for BiA0D storage in the
particulate phase. Thereby, whatever the selected mode (deliquescent or
metastable), there is no continental transport of oligomers due to fast and
quantitative release processes. It results in the simulation of short
duration peaks, accounting for local production from emissions.</p>
      <p>Finally, Fig. 7 reveals the recurrent loss of particulate BiA0D in
northern Spain during the period of study, mostly during daytime periods. It
shows an average duration of 2 to 6 h for the oligomer peak events,
which is quite short in view of the time required for pollutant mixing and
transport in the troposphere. Therefore, these local phenomena cannot affect
PM mixing ratios over large areas and for extended time periods. As the
transfer of BiA0D to the gas phase from the aerosol is frequent and total in
the KPH approach, its consistency has to be considered. This process appears
to be highly dependent both on the pH variability – which has been poorly
measured up to now – and on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change (from Eq. 1) required
to significantly alter the partition of BiA0D between the two phases. That is,
the choice of the reference <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value may be of primary importance. Such
findings question the relevance of simulating a low-constrained
reversibility for the formation of oligomers in 3-D models.</p>
      <p>From these results, three key points can be inferred. First, the structure
of oligomer concentration fields is driven both by the kinetic constant rate
and by average pBiA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D concentrations in the KIN approach, while it mainly
depends on the physical and chemical aerosol properties in the KPH approach.
In that latter approach, the formation of large quantities of oligomers
appears to be conditional on the presence of a deliquescent aerosol and of
strong acidity, sufficient initial particulate material, and possibly high
radical levels for the oxidation of biogenic VOCs. However, most of the
differences between this equilibrium approach and the kinetic one may be
reduced by considering a greater stability (better constrained
reversibility) in the pH-dependent oligomerization process. The relevance of
taking this into consideration in 3-D models will be discussed in the last
part of this article. Second, the total mass of simulated oligomers, as well
as their participation in the organic fraction of the aerosol, is clearly
specific to the adopted approach. This is quantitatively described in
Sect. 3.1.4. Finally, we have shown that the default solubility to BiA0D
is a determining element of the model results in the KPH approach. As it
affects the default quantities of BiA0D (and other oligomer precursors) in
the aerosol, it may also play a major role in the results of the KIN
approach. As the allocation of this parameter is quite uncertain, the
sensitivity of the model results to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be investigated in Sect. 3.2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <title>Oligomer to organic aerosol ratio in summer</title>
      <p>In a second step, we estimated the contribution of the modeled oligomers to
the biogenic secondary organic aerosol (BSOA) budget. For this analysis, we
first considered the ratio of oligomers arising from monoterpenes only to
the so-called BSOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">terp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (fraction of SOA induced by both hydrophilic and
hydrophobic species from monoterpenes, Fig. 8) and then, using the KIN
approach only, all biogenic (isoprene included) oligomers (Fig. 9) and
total BSOA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Modeled average BSOA concentration from monoterpenes simulated in
the reference case (left), from the KIN approach (center) and from the KPH
approach in the metastable mode (right) for the period 20 July–3 August
2006. Lower graph: contribution of oligomers to BSOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">terp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f08.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Modeled average BSOA concentration from isoprene and monoterpenes in
the reference case <bold>(a)</bold> and from the KIN approach <bold>(b)</bold> for
the period 20 July–3 August 2006.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f09.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p>When considering monoterpenes as the only oligomer precursors, the
implementation of a kinetic approach (Fig. 8a and b) results in a significant increase (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
the average OA mass concentration inside the plume. Although the general
structure of the plumes is not changed, the kinetic production of oligomers
leads to the presence of significant BSOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">terp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values over an area that
is much broader than in the reference case. On the opposite, the KPH
approach in deliquescent mode (Fig. 8c) does not modify
the average mass concentration and spatial distribution of BSOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">terp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The same conclusion can be drawn from the metastable version of KPH (not
shown here). In terms of ratios, the OA fraction that remains under the form
of oligomers (Fig. 8d and e, representing pOLG to BSOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">terp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio) represents 20 to 50 % of the organic aerosol mass originating in
monoterpenes over all the continental areas in the KIN approach. It is due
to the stabilization of a very large proportion of biogenic organic species
in the condensed phase under the form of oligomers. However, extreme values
of this ratio are simulated over marine areas (see the purple color, meaning
that approximately 80 % of BSOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">terp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is under the form of oligomers).
This phenomenon can be explained by a combination of two factors. First,
irreversible and continuous oligomer formation is the only possible chemical
evolution pathway for condensed biogenic species in this version of the
model. Second, in our model, marine areas are very little influenced by
fresh organic emissions, which tend to favor the omnipresence of an aged OA
over the sea. This is probably wrong, as high contributions of primary
organic matter to the marine aerosol were predicted. However, they are not
taken into account in our simulations (Ovadnevaite et al., 2011).
Furthermore, such a high degree of OA conversion to oligomers has never been
reported in the literature. Although it is limited on that point, it may be
partly unrealistic to simulate a single fate for all biogenic organics
present in the particulate phase. Despite this statement, the absolute OA
concentration simulated over the sea remains low (&lt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), thereby limiting the impact of this potential bias in the model.
With regard to KPH simulations, the model indicates (as expected) a very low
average contribution of oligomers to the mass of BSOA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">terp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over
continental areas, except in the north of Spain – where the contribution of
oligomers represents 10 to 20 % of the SOA mass concentration – and over
marine areas where it sometimes exceeds 40 %. Over continental areas, the
oligomer fraction is shown to be insignificant because of the frequent
reversal of the formation process due to wide pH variations (see above).</p>
      <p>Isoprene oxidation products are a major contributor (around 50 % in our
simulations) to the total SOA mass. Therefore, when their potential for
oligomerization is considered in KIN, they significantly contribute to this
aged organic fraction. Indeed, as can be seen in Fig. 9, when isoprene
surrogates are included in the OA aging process, the average BSOA mass
fraction increases by 2 to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the entire eastern and
southern areas of our domain. In these areas, its total concentrations reach
3 to 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The largest increases are obtained over Italy, as
well as over the Mediterranean and Adriatic seas, where the recirculation of
continental air masses possibly favors air mass aging under low dispersion
conditions.</p>
      <p>These results highlight the importance of closer identifying the oxidation
products of the main atmospheric biogenic volatile organic compounds
(BVOCs), as well as their
structure and reactivity. In particular, questions still arise about the way
the evolution of condensed isoprene derivatives should be represented.
Indeed, the assumption of Carlton et al. (2010), which states that the
formation of oligomers is driven by a same first-order rate constant whatever
the oxidation products, is questionable. First, because this parameterization
derives from the evolution of cyclic compounds in chamber experiments, which
is the case for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, the two most common
monoterpenes, but not for isoprene and its derivatives. The oxidation of
isoprene by hydroxyl radicals leads to the formation of methyl vinyl ketone
and methacrolein (Pandis et al., 1991, Paulot et al., 2009), which in turn
produces tetrols and methylglyceric acid (Claeys et al., 2004; Surratt et
al., 2006; Kleindienst et al., 2009) that are aliphatic compounds. Although
oligomer formation from the oxidation of isoprene has been shown to occur in
smog chambers (e.g., Sato et al., 2011; Nguyen et al., 2011a, b; Liu et al.,
2012a; Tan et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2014), the oligomer formation process is
likely to differ significantly from that from aromatics as measured by
Kalberer et al. (2004). Second, since this kinetic constant only stands for
an average reactivity, Kalberer et al. (2004), during their experiments,
could only observe the fact that 50 % of the total organic mass was
conversed to oligomer-like species. Such results cannot establish whether all
aromatic compounds have undergone oligomerization following the same pathway
or if its evolution was only attributable to a specific set of compounds.
Applying this parameterization to a large set of biogenic species may cause
an incorrect assessment of the contribution of oligomers to the total SOA
budget.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS5">
  <title>Comparisons of KIN and KPH approaches with measurements</title>
      <p>As mentioned above, no direct measurement of the oligomer fraction of SOA is
available at ground-based measurement stations. However, we can assess the
role of oligomer formation processes in improving model–measurement
comparisons, knowing that the organic fraction of atmospheric aerosols is
usually underestimated by models (Heald et al., 2011). In this section, we
present the comparison of CHIMERE organic carbon (OC) mass concentration in
the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction of aerosols, obtained with four different model
configurations (REF, KIN and KPH in both modes) with measurements obtained
at two EMEP background sites: the rural stations of Harwell in the United
Kingdom (100 km west of London) and Melpitz in eastern Germany (150 km south
of Berlin). Figure 10 presents these comparisons for the period
20 July–3 August 2006, the statistical data (mean bias, MB,
normalized mean bias, NMB, root mean square error, RMSE, normalized root
mean square error, NRMSE, and correlation coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) being given in
Table 2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Comparisons of OC measurements (circles) with simulated OC in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained in the reference simulation (blue), using the kinetic
approach configuration (red), and using both KPH approaches – either in
deliquescent or metastable mode (green and dark-green curves, respectively) at
the Harwell (UK, top) and Melpitz (Germany, bottom) sites during the month of
July 2006.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Globally, whatever the configuration, the modeled OC is severely
underestimated at both stations. Nevertheless, the KIN approach provides an
increase in the OC mass concentration of about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
reduces significantly the gap between model and measurements, both at
Harwell and Melpitz sites. According to Table 2, the mean bias is reduced
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.10 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.82 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Harwell) and from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.71 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.82 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Melpitz) compared with the reference simulation, but the
correlation coefficient remains the same (around 0.5 and 0.7, respectively).
This is due to the fact that the impact of the kinetic-dependent production
of oligomers is quite little time-dependent and thus does not allow for the
restitution of the peaks observed along the period and missed by CHIMERE in
its reference configuration. Thus, this approach rather provides an increase
in the OC background level and does not position oligomers as likely to
account for the short-time variability of OC in summer. This result
highlights the importance of ensuring the consistency of the process
kinetics, and intensity (which is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependant).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Statistical results for organic carbon (OC) simulation (reference,
KIN approach, KPH deliquescent and metastable approaches).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OC (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NMB (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RMSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NRMSE (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6" align="center">GB36 – Harwell </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">REF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>77.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">94.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KIN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>57.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">78.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KPH-deliquescent aerosol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">93.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KPH-metastable aerosol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">93.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6" align="center">DE44 – Melpitz </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">REF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">83.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KIN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>51.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">59.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KPH-deliquescent aerosol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>75.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">83.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KPH-metastable aerosol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>74.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">82.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The pH-dependent approaches have shown to cause a fast and intense
production of oligomers that may induce such a short-time variability in the
SOA fraction of the aerosol. Here, though, there is no quantitative impact
of this process on the OC mass concentration level all along the period,
whatever the site. Such results could be expected in the deliquescent
configuration, since we concluded that the simulated relative humidity was
too low to permit the transport of oligomers over long distances. But it
appears that the metastable mode, which promotes oligomer persistence and
its transport in the atmosphere, also does not significantly impact the
organic carbon concentration at those sites. One possible explanation for
the lack of effects is the non-inclusion of isoprene as an oligomer
precursor in the KPH simulations, especially because the analysis of the
model output reveals that 60 to 70 % of KIN oligomers derived from
isoprene at both stations. However, the conditions in which the KPH
simulation was launched, and mainly the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value used for the BiA0D
species in conjunction with the variability of the aerosol pH, could also
account for the low production of oligomers in remote continental areas of
Europe.</p>
      <p>The sensitivity of oligomer parameterizations to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input
parameters is investigated in the next paragraph.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Sensitivity to the $K_{\mathrm{H}}$ value}?><title>Sensitivity to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value</title>
      <p>From the model results presented in Figs. 4 to 7, we found that the
amplitude of oligomer formation was potentially strongly dependent on the
reference <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of BiA0D, whatever approach is taken. Yet, the
solubility of Bia0D has to be considered as an uncertain parameter. First
because Bia0D accounts for 11 monoterpenes oxidation products, which
partition differently and may be poorly approximated via a unique <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
value. Second, it is recognized that, regardless of the group
contribution approach used, uncertainties in the estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grow
when solubility exceeds 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, due to a lack of experimental
measurements (Raventos-Duran et al., 2010). This is an important issue as all
11 species represented by pinonaldehyde all have a solubility greater than
that of pinonaldehyde itself (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This is
notably the case of hydroxypinonaldehyde
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), ketolimonoaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) or 2-hydroxy-3-iso-propyl-6-oxo-heptanal
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Consequently, it appears warranted to
consider the possibility for the BiA0D Henry's law constant to vary by
several orders of magnitude. Thus, in order to evaluate the robustness of
each approach to this input parameter, sensitivity tests to the solubility
of the BiA0D species were conducted with CHIMERE.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Influence on the surrogate partitioning properties</title>
      <p>In view of surrogate properties presented in Fig. 3a, our sensitivity
study focused on the transition area, that is the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which allows for accounting for the solubility of
all the potential oxidation products mentioned before, while providing
estimates of the impact of correcting the global BiA0D <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. In
this range, we considered three specific <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for BiA0D
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Before conducting
the sensitivity tests in CHIMERE, we evaluated the influence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on
the partitioning coefficient of BiA0D, using the same graphs as in Sect. 2, over the whole range of possible pH values and with a liquid water
content of 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> water cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results are presented in
Fig. 11. The reference value (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, black
curve of Fig. 11) corresponds to the left part of Fig. 3a, that is a
quite null value of the partitioning coefficient. Here, we can see that only
an acidic aqueous phase (pH &lt; 4) allows for the quantitative formation
of oligomers. When increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to a value in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> range, we enter the second area of Fig. 3a, where
the particulate fraction of BiA0D becomes significant for a LWC of
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> water cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. There, a significant formation of
SOA takes place from neutral conditions with 10 to 52 % of BiA0D being
in the condensed phase, depending on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. For a pH of 5,
particulate fraction reaches 48 and 90 % in favor of the aerosol
phase, for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. However, in this transition area, the partition of the
surrogate species remains strongly influenced by the liquid water content.
Such results underline the threshold condensation phenomenon for this range
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Also, such a sensitivity of BiA0D solubility to the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value may have important consequences for the results of the KPH
approach (whatever the mode considered). Indeed, considering the highest
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value instead of the standard one, at pH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, in the reference
simulations, causes the reference particulate fraction of BiA0D to increase
from 0 to 52 % (with LWC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> water cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
impact of implementing a pH-dependent approach will thus be lower and the
resulting speciation of the OA material will show a much lesser proportion
of oligomers.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Evolution of the particulate fraction of a given species as a
function of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration according to the Eq. (1), for three different
values of its Henry's law constant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] at a LWC of
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> water cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Impact on the simulated oligomer concentration fields</title>
      <p>The sensitivity tests were launched with CHIMERE in the reference, KIN and
KPH configurations (in both deliquescent and metastable modes) using each
time a different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value, as mentioned in the previous section. The
average simulated oligomer concentrations fields are shown in Fig. 12 for
the KIN (left), KPH deliquescent (center) and KPH metastable (right)
approaches.</p>
      <p>In the KIN approach, we observe that an increase in the value of the Henry's
law constant value (from top to bottom, left column) induces an increase in
average simulated oligomer concentrations, due to the low solubility of the
BiA0D species in the standard configuration, which was identified as a
limiting parameter for the kinetic production of oligomer in the condensed
phase. However, this dependency is nonlinear. The increase of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by
almost 4 orders of magnitude (from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) induces approximately the same response as a further increase by
1 order of magnitude (from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over Italy and the Adriatic Sea
in each case. Clearly, there is a low effect of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability under a
threshold located around 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the simulated
atmospheric conditions</p>
      <p>The interpretation of the model behavior is more complex in the KPH
configuration. As stated above, the KPH parameterization affects the
partition between the gas and particulate phases, and oligomer
concentrations are accounted for by an increment in the quantities of the
condensed surrogate BiA0D. For the deliquescent mode, when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 12e), oligomer concentrations increase over
continental areas by 0.1 to 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on the average, compared
with the simulation using the standard <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value (Fig. 12b). Indeed,
as the solubility of Bia0D becomes higher, the decrease in pH required to
form particulate material is reduced. Thus, even for pH values around 4–5,
the partitioning of BiA0D towards the aerosol phase is favored. In this
configuration, the oligomer maxima are located over the continent and not
over the Adriatic, which means that the spatial and temporal evolution of
SOA is substantially modified by the choice of the default <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value.
When shifting again the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value by 1 order of magnitude (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 12h), we observe a decrease in the oligomer
concentrations compared with Fig. 12e. This result illustrates the fact
that, in this configuration, the default BiA0D partition is much in favor of
the particulate phase, and that there is no significant effect of further
increasing the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value through Eq. (1). However, in these three simulations, the total SOA mass from hydrophilic biogenic species (not
shown, corresponding to pBiA0D dissolved by default <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> the incremental
fraction due to the effect of Eq. 1 on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) increases from the
low to the high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value scenario. With regard to the metastable mode, the
absolute increase in the oligomer concentration due to acidity is
significantly higher than in the deliquescent mode (see the concentration
scale) due to the fact that, in this configuration, there is no parameter
(such as relative humidity, RH) able to set the quantity of oligomer present in
the condensed phase back to zero. There, as for the deliquescent mode, the spatial and
temporal features of oligomer production are profoundly altered by the
assignation of the BiA0D <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. Knowing the complex composition of
this surrogate species, it is a major difficulty in the implementation of
the KPH approach.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mean modeled oligomer concentrations from monoterpenes hydrophilic
surrogates (thus without BiBmP) for both approaches: KIN (left), KPH
deliquescent (center) and KPH metastable mode (right) over 20 July–3 August
2006. The simulations are conducted using for BiA0D the following
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (top, <bold>a, b, c</bold>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (middle, <bold>d, e, f</bold>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Matm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (bottom, <bold>g, h, i</bold>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1361/2016/gmd-9-1361-2016-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Finally, whatever the choice of BiA0D solubility, the location and the
spatial extent of oligomer formation remain different in the three configurations of CHIMERE. While the kinetic production of oligomer species
leads to a diffuse plume with maximum values in the Mediterranean and over
southern Europe, while the highest concentrations are observed over forested
areas of central Europe – thus closer to biogenic sources – in the KPH
approaches where instantaneous oligomer production is simulated. This result
draws our attention to the impact of the oligomer formation rate on the
distribution of SOA in continental plumes, especially considering the
diversity of relevant SOA precursors in the BiA0D species. Finally, it is
worth noting, however, that the high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scenario of the metastable KPH
mode makes little sense, as the KPH approach is based on the possibility for
OA formation to depend on the specificities of the aerosol aqueous phase,
which is no longer the case in Fig. 12e and h.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussions and conclusions</title>
      <p>Given the dissimilarities between the oligomer concentration fields
simulated with CHIMERE using two different approaches, and considering the
sensitivity tests that were conducted, the principles that guide the
different approaches must be discussed, and further developments have to be
considered.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Oligomer formation from isoprene</title>
      <p>First of all, the fate of isoprene in the condensed phase shall be examined,
as isoprene has been recognized as a major SOA precursor through its first
generation products methacrolein (MACR) and methyl vinyl ketone (MVK)
(Pandis et al., 1991; Carlton et al., 2009), which were found to be
important oligomer precursors in the condensed phase (El Haddad et al.,
2009; Liu et al., 2012b; Renard et al., 2013). On this specific point, the
study of Renard et al. (2015), based on the photo-oxidation of MVK into a
photo-reactor, revealed that considering only a first-order rate constant to
represent the formation of oligomers is not appropriate, as the oxidation of
MVK by OH was (in the condensed phase of the deliquescent aerosol) governed
by a kinetic competition between functionalization and oligomerization,
which depends on the precursor initial concentration. Furthermore, the
branching ratio in favor of highly oxidized monomers seems to be more
important in the condensed phase than in the gas phase (Kroll and Seinfeld,
2008), thus favoring the formation of a stable OA. A multiphase box model
study conducted by Ervens et al. (2015) based on the laboratory experiments
of Renard et al. (2015) underlined a potential key role of the MVK-to-oxygen
concentration ratio in the oligomerization rate under atmospherically
relevant conditions. Thus, in the case of isoprene, the formation of
oligomers via the oxidation by OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the condensed phase may well
be represented by a kinetic approach based on a second-order rate constant.
The authors propose a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oligo</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the single oxidation reaction of MVK and MACR
by OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, but they recommend being cautious with this value as the
kinetics may differ within the variety of atmospheric conditions (LWC,
OH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, MACR, MVK concentrations, etc.).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Further developments for oligomer formation dynamics</title>
      <p>On a broader level, the difficulty of restituting faithfully oligomer yields
and SOA formation dynamics comes from the diversity of the phenomena that
drive SOA formation in the atmosphere. It is indeed clear now that
oligomerization processes, which may produce up to 50 % of SOA on
average, rely on both the volatility of the multiple SVOCs and their
reactivity in the condensed phase, which is controlled by a series of
oxidation, association and fragmentation reactions that can be kinetically
described.</p>
      <p>One important issue is thus our ability to describe in an appropriate manner
the variety of SVOC behaviors in the gas and condensed phase in an AQM. As
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, we have discussed the fact that the representation of
SVOC partitioning in models for now is not highly accurate. Most 3-D models
indeed use one single <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value to account for the behavior of a complex
mixture of SOA precursors, and this format clearly prevents the model to
restitute the full diversity of the gas-particle partitioning of individual
compounds in time and space. This is all the more important because the
results we obtained with CHIMERE showed that oligomer concentrations present
a considerable sensitivity to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value selected for the biogenic
surrogate species that produces SOA. Similarly, when simulating chemistry in
the aerosol phase, the allocation of distinct kinetic constant values for
the reactivity of the condensed oligomer precursors would be valuable.
Kalberer et al. (2006) effectively observed disparities in the temporal
evolution of the aerosol molar mass while studying the oxidation of
trimethylbenzene, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and isoprene. Taking this into account
would probably have increased the OC short-time variability of the KIN
method. However, increasing the degree of refinement of a modeling approach
through a differentiation of individual behaviors is not always a good
solution. The more refined the scheme becomes, the more difficult it is to
collect the details about organic compound reactivity, making it difficult
to set up the approach in a 3-D model. As an example, the KPH approach
proposes to consider the specific formation of oligomers from the
polymerization of aldehydes only, which may happen through diverse
acid-catalyzed reactions. Although it is evident that the consideration of
only one single polymerization pathway constitutes a limitation for the
quantitative simulation of SOA production from ambient organic precursors,
this hypothesis has the advantage of proposing a well-identified process,
which can be adjusted in the model in terms of intensity, and upon the
environmental conditions, from experimental knowledge about this reaction.
However, in this approach, isoprene oxidation products (ISOPA) could not be
considered as oligomer precursors, due to the fact that the KPH approach is
only applicable to aldehydes and that there is no detail about the
structural properties of the ISOPA surrogate species in the current CHIMERE
chemical scheme. Including all or part of this species in the
oligomerization process would thus have introduced an indeterminate
uncertainty in our simulations. The outcome of this is a severe
underestimation of the modeled OC compared with Harwell and Melptiz
observation, that was – at least partly – attributed to the non-inclusion
of isoprene in oligomer precursors when running CHIMERE with the KPH
configuration. Similarly, we have seen that the dependence of the model
results upon (i) the state (deliquescent or metastable) of the aerosol, and
(ii) its inorganic composition and pH, constitute a key challenge for the
implementation of the KPH approach. In this respect, there is a necessity to
define a parameterization focusing on the restitution of a unique parameter
(such as the dynamics of global SOA yields), and relying on an irreducible
set of parameters and processes, provided that it allows the model to
perform satisfactorily with regard to existing measurements. For this
purpose, in situ atmospheric oligomer measurements conducted at various distances
from the sources would be absolutely necessary to assign a representative
average value for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the SVOC surrogate species – as our results
showed that the rate and intensity of the SVOC transfer to the aerosol phase
give the SOA plumes their shapes.</p>
      <p>Another path of research would be to impose a minimum value for the transfer
of a given biogenic SVOC species to the aqueous phase, in order to
quantitatively restitute rapid oligomer formation without significantly
increasing the size of the chemical scheme in the AQM. Then, kinetically
adjusted chemical reactions simulating both the oligomer formation and
release should be added to control the stability of this organic fraction in
the aerosol. Indeed, the definitive character of the formation of oligomers
is the key to a correct representation of their total mass and dynamics of
formation, as was shown by our comparative study of irreversible (KIN) and
reversible (KPH) oligomerization processes at the continental scale.</p>
      <p>How can we improve the representation of oligomer stability in the modeling
approaches investigated here? The literature does not give a straightforward
answer to the question of oligomerization reversibility. Several observations
and experiments reported in the literature point to the irreversibility – at
least partial – of the oligomerization process. According to a recent study
of Liu et al. (2012b), the formation of oligomers from methacrolein and
methyl vinyl ketone (isoprene oxidation products) is irreversible. This
assumption is supported by the recent works of Hall and
Johnston (2012a), who investigated the thermal stability of a SOA matrix
including 50 % of oligomeric species formed by the ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene: the authors concluded that, at ambient temperatures, oligomeric
species should be non-volatile by structure. However, Trump and Donahue (2014)
report discording results about SOA mass yields in these experiments, that
point to an oligomerization process that would be reversible under specific
conditions (dilution, temperature), which is probably a good compromise in
the interpretation of all laboratory experiments.</p>
      <p>Considering these elements, the kinetic approach that represents oligomer
formation as the only possible fate for the relevant condensed organics may
lead to a significant overestimation of the oligomer fraction in the aerosol.
Thus, it should at least take into account a possible loss of SOA by
evaporation, due notably to fragmentation processes (Renard et al., 2015).
Indeed, organic compounds in the particulate phase have shown to be submitted
to a variety of non-oxidative and oxidative reactions leading to the
formation of both semi-volatile and non-volatile compounds, depending on
their final molecular weight (Kroll and Seinfeld, 2008; Kroll et al., 2009).
Furthermore, the absence of reversibility in the kinetic approach makes it
little adaptable to laboratory observations such as the evaporation of SOA
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene on the scale of a few hours (Grieshop et al., 2007). On
the contrary, the high
SOA mass yields obtained from the oxidation of biogenic SVOCs cannot be
reproduced using the KPH-deliquescent approach, as SOA formed this way is
permanently released due to aerosol water evaporation or pH increase.
Whatever the model configuration, our works have shown that the
oligomerization reversibility proposed by the KPH approach was difficult to
set up and control in an AQM. Therefore, considering (i) the laboratory
experiments conducted by Hall and Johnson (2012b) on the
ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, which indicated that oligomer formation would
be driven by reactive uptake rather than by the partition of monomers between
both phases and (ii) the fact that this reactive uptake may be observed
within seconds (Heaton et al., 2007; Hall and Johnson, 2012b), it
appears more realistic to propose a representation of the oligomerization
process in two stages: a first fast step modifying directly the monomer
partitioning so as to represent the rapid formation of oligomers (not
permitted by the KIN approach only), and a stabilization step consisting of a
kinetic uptake of the OA previously formed (not adjustable in a KPH
approach). Trump and Donahue (2014) have recently proposed a comprehensive
but simplified vision of reversible oligomerization that effectively combines
a partitioning equilibrium and a condensed-phase kinetic reactivity, and that
clearly addresses the issue of reversibility. This vision was built from the
VBS approach, a modeling technique relying on SVOC volatility bins rather
than on identified chemical species to represent the progressive formation of
SOA from gaseous organic compounds upon atmospheric oxidation processes
(Robinson et al., 2007). The works of Trump and Donahue propose a detailed
analysis of an expanded VBS version, taking into account oligomer formation
dynamics in a quite similar way as here: namely, the description of the
equilibrium-phase partitioning of various VOC oxidation products from a given
volatility bin, and a kinetic-dependent reactivity in the condensed phase
where the association of two identical particulate monomers compete with the
dissociation of the dimers thus formed. The ratio of those two rate constants
makes a dimerization formation equilibrium. There, major simplifying
assumptions are made. They mainly stem from the fact that only one single
volatility class of condensed products reacts, and that this class reacts in
its entirety – regardless of the structure of precursors – to form
carboxylic acid dimers. Indeed, representative equilibrium constants for the
dimerization reaction were derived from laboratory works on dicarboxylic acid
dimers formation. Finally, it is stressed by the authors that neither of the
simplifications considered in this approach is likely to be realistic, and
that the stated goal of their work is only to identify what type of chemistry
this method produces and how it helps understanding/representing oligomers in
the atmosphere. Despite such simplifications, the authors show that their
approach allows for restituting experimental SOA yields for different initial
OA conditions, as well as SOA formation dynamics. A particularly interesting
result of this approach is the simulation of a two-stage SOA evaporation
(monomers evaporate rapidly upon dilution while only a modest drop in
oligomer concentration is simulated due to the equilibrium dynamics) that may
help reproducing recent observations of delayed SOA evaporation. Through
sensitivity tests to the condensed-phase reactivity kinetics, this approach
also outlines that an irreversible oligomerization process (high dimerization
to evaporation kinetic ratio) would definitely appear incompatible with the
observed SOA mass-yield behaviors.</p>
      <p>As for conventional modeling approaches relying on molecule structural
properties, and based on these findings, a KPH-like approach considering a
further reactive uptake – with partial reversibility or fragmentation so as
to fit the observations about the hysteresis of SOA formation and evaporation
– could be a suitable parameterization to represent the formation of
oligomers from monoterpenes. Even so, the determination of the aerosol mode
(deliquescent/metastable) is not an obvious choice. Although Fountoukis et
al. (2009) concluded from plume studies that organics could promote
thermodynamically stable water down to very low RH, Moya et al. (2002) have
shown that considering a metastable mode for PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (where organic matter
is predominantly present) leads, under low relative humidity conditions
(&lt; 60 %), to significant errors in the concentrations of the
inorganic species, which indirectly determine the aerosol pH and thus
oligomers formation. Similarly, Mikhailov et al. (2013) found – from the
analysis of atmospheric aerosols – that under a RH level of about 70 %,
organic species may not be completely dissolved in the aqueous phase and may
also coexist in a solid aerosol phase. These studies both conclude to the
importance of considering a deliquescent mode for low relative humidity
conditions.</p>
      <p>Beyond the fundamental lack of in situ data required to evaluate oligomer and SOA
concentration fields produced by AQMs, new advances are expected from
further laboratory works to improve the accuracy of SOA formation processes
in the models. In particular, as has been indicated by Trump and Donahue (2014), any sophistication of oligomer formation approaches would require
advances in the knowledge of SOA yields and oligomer production dynamics.
Such experiments would allow for building relevant thermodynamical and chemical
schemes that simulate the dynamics of SVOC capture, their reactivity in the
condensed phase, as well as their further potential for atmospheric release,
to be implemented in AQMs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the French national program PRIMEQUAL in the frame
of the OLD-AIR project. The authors acknowledge the EBAS data providers and
owners for the aerosol measurements at EMEP sites.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: H. Tost</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aksoyoglu, S., Keller, J., Barmpadimos, I., Oderbolz, D., Lanz, V. A.,
Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Aerosol modelling in Europe
with a focus on Switzerland during summer and winter episodes, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 7355–7373, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7355-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7355-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bessagnet, B., Hodzic, A., Vautard, R., Beekmann, M., Cheinet, S., Honore,
C., Liousse, C., and Rouil, L.: Aerosol modeling with CHIMERE – preliminary
evaluation at the continental scale, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2803–2817,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.034</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bessagnet, B., Menut, L., Curci, G., Hodzic, A., Guillaume, B., Liousse, C.,
Moukhtar, S., Pun, B., Seigneur, C., and Schulz, M.: Regional modeling of
carbonaceous aerosols over Europe-focus on secondary organic aerosols, J.
Atmos. Chem., 61, 175–202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10874-009-9129-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-009-9129-2</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bessagnet, B., Menut, L., Curci, G., Hodzic, A., Guillaume, B., Liousse, C.,
Moukhtar, S., Pun, B., Seigneur, C., and Schulz, M.: Regional modeling of
carbonaceous aerosols over Europe-focus on secondary organic aerosols, J.
Atmos. Chem., 61, 175–202, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S. P., Mathur, R.,
Roselle, S. J., and Weber, R. J.: CMAQ Model Performance Enhanced When
In-Cloud Secondary Organic Aerosol is Included: Comparisons of Organic Carbon
Predictions with Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 8798–8802,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es801192n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es801192n</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary
Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
4987–5005, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Bhave, P. V., Napelenok, S. L., Edney, E. D., Sarwar, G.,
Pinder, R. W., Pouliot, G. A., and Houyoux, M.: Model Representation of
Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44,
8553–8560, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es100636q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es100636q</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Carter, W. P. L.: A Detailed Mechanism for the Gas-Phase Atmospheric
Reactions of Organic-Compounds, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen., 24, 481–518,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90005-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(90)90005-8</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Couvidat, F. and Sartelet, K.: The Secondary Organic Aerosol Processor
(SOAP v1.0) model: a unified model with different ranges of complexity based
on the molecular surrogate approach, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1111–1138,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1111-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-1111-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Couvidat, F. and Seigneur, C.: Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation
from isoprene oxidation under dry and humid conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 893–909, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-893-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-893-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Couvidat, F., Debry, E., Sartelet, K., and Seigneur, C.: A
hydrophilic/hydrophobic organic (H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O) aerosol model: Developmentn
evaluation and sensitivity analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D10304,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017214</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Claeys, M., Graham, B., Vas, G., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Pashynska, V.,
Cafmeyer, J., Guyon, P., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., and Maenhaut, W.:
Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosol Through Photooxidation of Isoprene,
Science, 303, 1173–1176, 10.1126/science.1092805, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric organic
particulate matter: From smoke to secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Environ.,
43, 94–106, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dudhia, J.: A nonhydrostatic Version of the Penn State-NCAR Mesoscale Model:
Validation Tests and Simulation of an Atlantic Cyclone and Cold Front, Mon.
Weather Rev., 121, 1493–1513, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>El Haddad, I., Yao Liu, Nieto-Gligorovski, L., Michaud, V., Temime-Roussel,
B., Quivet, E., Marchand, N., Sellegri, K., and Monod, A.: In-cloud processes
of methacrolein under simulated conditions – Part 2: Formation of secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5107–5117,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5107-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5107-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Renard, P., Tlili, S., Ravier, S., Clément, J.-L., and Monod,
A.: Aqueous-phase oligomerization of methyl vinyl ketone through
photooxidation – Part 2: Development of the chemical mechanism and
atmospheric implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9109–9127,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9109-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9109-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C., Nenes, A., Sullivan, A., Weber, R., Van Reken, T., Fischer,
M., Matías, E., Moya, M., Farmer, D., and Cohen, R. C.: Thermodynamic
characterization of Mexico City aerosol during MILAGRO 2006, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 2141–2156, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2141-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2141-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fuzzi, S., Andreae, M. O., Huebert, B. J., Kulmala, M., Bond, T. C., Boy, M.,
Doherty, S. J., Guenther, A., Kanakidou, M., Kawamura, K., Kerminen, V.-M.,
Lohmann, U., Russell, L. M., and Pöschl, U.: Critical assessment of the
current state of scientific knowledge, terminology, and research needs
concerning the role of organic aerosols in the atmosphere, climate, and
global change, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2017–2038,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2017-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-2017-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gao, S., Ng, N. L., Keywood, M., Varutbangkul, V., Bahreini, R., Nenes, A.,
He, J. W., Yoo, K. Y., Beauchamp, J. L., Hodyss, R. P., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Particle phase acidity and oligomer formation in secondary
organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 6582–6589,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es049125k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es049125k</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gelbard, F. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Simulation of Multicomponent Aerosol
Dynamics, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 78, 485–501,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(80)90587-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9797(80)90587-1</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Is the gas-particle
partitioning in alpha-pinene secondary organic aerosol reversible?, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L14810, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029987</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hall IV, W. A. and Johnston, M. V.: The Thermal-Stability of Oligomers in
Alpha-Pinene Secondary Organic Aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 983–989,
2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hall IV, W. A. and Johnston, M.: Oligomer Formation Pathways in Secondary
Organic Aerosol from MS and MS/MS Measurements with High Mass Accuracy and
Resolving Power, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr., 23, 1097–1108, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hauglustaine, D., Hourdin, F., Jourdain, L., Filiberti, M.-A., Walters, S.,
Lamarque, J.-F., and Holland, E.: Interactive chemistry in the Laboratoire de
Météorologie Dynamique general circulation model: Description and
background tropospheric chemistry evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D04314, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003957</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Coe, H., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Bahreini, R.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Russell, L. M., Jolleys, M., Fu, T.-M., Allan, J. D.,
Bower, K. N., Capes, G., Crosier, J., Morgan, W. T., Robinson, N. H.,
Williams, P. I., Cubison, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., and Dunlea, E. J.: Exploring
the vertical profile of atmospheric organic aerosol: comparing 17 aircraft
field campaigns with a global model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12673–12696,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Heaton, K. J., Dreyfus, M. A., Wang, S., and Johnston, M. V.: Oligomers in
the early stage of biogenic secondary organic aerosol formation and growth,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6129–6136, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A
critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of
atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, H.: Kinetics of Aqueous Phase Reactions Relevant for Atmospheric
Chemistry, Chem. Rev., 103, 4691–4716, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Jang, M. S., Czoschke, N. M., and Northcross, A. L.: Semiempirical model for
organic aerosol growth by acid-catalyzed heterogeneous reactions of organic
carbonyls, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 164–174, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es048977h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es048977h</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kalberer, M., Paulsen, D., Sax, M., Steinbacher, M., Dommen, J., Prevot, A.
S. H., Fisseha, R., Weingartner, E., Frankevich, V., Zenobi, R., and
Baltensperger, U.: Identification of polymers as major components of
atmospheric organic aerosols, Science, 303, 1659–1662,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092185</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kalberer, M., Sax, M., and Samburova, V.: Molecular Size Evolution of
Oligomers in Organic Aerosols Collected in Urban Atmospheres and Generated in
a Smog Chamber, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5917–5922, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J.,
Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J.,
Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat,
G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E.,
Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate
modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Maben, J. R., Stevenson, E., and Wall, A. C.
D.: Closure evaluation of size-resolved aerosol pH in the New England coastal
atmosphere during summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D23307, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004801" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004801</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., and Edney,
E. O.: The formation of secondary organic aerosol from the isoprene <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH
reaction in the absence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6541–6558,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6541-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6541-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Isoprene Photooxidation, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 1869–1877, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Smith, J. D., Che, D. L., Kessler, S. H., Worsnop, D. R., and
Wilson, K. R.: Measurement of fragmentation and functionalization pathways in
the heterogeneous oxidation of oxidized organic aerosol, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8005–8014, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., and Pirjola, L.: Parameterizations for sulfuric
acid/water nucleation rates, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 8301–8307,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97jd03718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97jd03718</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y.-H., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Chu, K., Siejack, R. A., Zhang, H.,
Riva, M., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Kautzman, K. E., and Surratt, J. D.:
Light-absorbing oligomer formation in secondary organic aerosol from reactive
uptake of isoprene epoxydiols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12012–12021,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Monod, A., Tritscher, T., Praplan, A. P., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Temime-Roussel, B., Quivet, E., Marchand, N., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger,
U.: Aqueous phase processing of secondary organic aerosol from isoprene
photooxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5879–5895,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5879-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5879-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., Siekmann, F., Renard, P., El Zein, A., Salque, G., El Haddad, I.,
Temime-Roussel, B., Voisin, D., Thissen, R., and Monod, A.: Oligomer and SOA
formation through aqueous phase photooxidation of methacrolein and methyl
vinyl ketone, Atmos. Environ., 49, 123–129, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Ludwig, J. and Klemm, O.: Acidity of Size-Fractionated Aerosol-Particles,
Water Air Soil Poll., 49, 35–50, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00279508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00279508</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Menut, L., Bessagnet, B., Khvorostyanov, D., Beekmann, M., Blond, N.,
Colette, A., Coll, I., Curci, G., Foret, G., Hodzic, A., Mailler, S., Meleux,
F., Monge, J.-L., Pison, I., Siour, G., Turquety, S., Valari, M., Vautard,
R., and Vivanco, M. G.: CHIMERE 2013: a model for regional atmospheric
composition modelling, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 981–1028,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-981-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-981-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Mikhailov, E., Vlasenko, S., Rose, D., and Pöschl, U.: Mass-based
hygroscopicity parameter interaction model and measurement of atmospheric
aerosol water uptake, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 717–740,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-717-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-717-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Molnar, A. and Meszaros, E.: On the relation between the size and chemical
composition of aerosol particles and their optical properties, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 5053–5058, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00314-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00314-4</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Morris, R. E., Bonyoung, K., Guenther, A., Yarwood, G., McNally, D., Tesche,
T. W., Tonnesen, G., Boylan, J., and Brewer, P.: Model sensitivity evaluation
for organic carbon using two multi-pollutant air quality models that simulate
regional haze in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 40,
4960–4972, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Mouchel-Vallon, C., Bräuer, P., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Madronich, S.,
Herrmann, H., and Aumont, B.: Explicit modeling of volatile organic compounds
partitioning in the atmospheric aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
1023–1037, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1023-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1023-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Moya, M., Pandis, S. N., and Jacobson, M. Z.: Is the size distribution of
urban aerosols determined by thermodynamic equilibrium?: An application to
Southern California, Atmos. Environ., 36, 2349–2365, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1009604003981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1009604003981</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Roach, P. J., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of humidity on the composition of isoprene photooxidation secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6931–6944,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Nitrogen-containing organic compounds and oligomers in secondary organic
aerosol formed by photooxidation of isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45,
6908–6918, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Ovadnevaite, J., O'Dowd, C., Dall'Osto, M., and Ceburnis, D.: Detecting high
contributions of primary organic matter to marine aerosol: A case study,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L02807, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046083" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046083</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Pandis, S. N., Paulson, S. E., Seinfeld, J. H., and Flagan, R. C.: Aerosol
formation in the photooxidation of isoprene and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Atmos.
Environ. A-Gen., 25, 997–1008, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Pankow, J. F.: An Absorption-Model of Gas-Particle Partitioning of
Organic-Compounds in the Atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 28, 185–188,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90093-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(94)90093-0</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P., Jimenez, J. L., Aiken, A. C., Gaffney, J.
S., and Marley, N. A.: Primary and secondary contributions to aerosol light
scattering and absorption in Mexico City during the MILAGRO 2006 campaign,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3721–3730, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3721-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3721-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Paulot, F., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kroll, J. H., Seinfeld, J. H.,
and Wennberg, P. O.: Isoprene photooxidation: new insights into the
production of acids and organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1479–1501,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1479-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1479-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Petetin, H., Beekmann, M., Sciare, J., Bressi, M., Rosso, A., Sanchez, O.,
and Ghersi, V.: A novel model evaluation approach focusing on local and
advected contributions to urban PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels – application to Paris,
France, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1483–1505, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1483-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-1483-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Pun, B. K.: Development and initial application of the sesquiversion of
MADRID, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D12212, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009888" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd009888</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Pun, B. K. and Seigneur, C.: Investigative modeling of new pathways for
secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2199–2216,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2199-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-2199-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Pun, B. K., Seigneur, C., and Lohman, K.: Modeling secondary organic aerosol
formation via multiphase partitioning with molecular data, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 40, 4722–4731, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0522736" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0522736</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Raventos-Duran, T., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C., and
Aumont, B.: Structure-activity relationships to estimate the effective
Henry's law constants of organics of atmospheric interest, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7643–7654, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7643-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7643-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Renard, P., Siekmann, F., Gandolfo, A., Socorro, J., Salque, G., Ravier, S.,
Quivet, E., Clément, J.-L., Traikia, M., Delort, A.-M., Voisin, D.,
Vuitton, V., Thissen, R., and Monod, A.: Radical mechanisms of methyl vinyl
ketone oligomerization through aqueous phase OH-oxidation: on the paradoxical
role of dissolved molecular oxygen, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6473–6491,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6473-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-6473-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Renard, P., Siekmann, F., Salque, G., Demelas, C., Coulomb, B., Vassalo, L.,
Ravier, S., Temime-Roussel, B., Voisin, D., and Monod, A.: Aqueous-phase
oligomerization of methyl vinyl ketone through photooxidation – Part 1:
Aging processes of oligomers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 21–35,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-21-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-21-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1261, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Sato, K., Nakao, S., Clark, C. H., Qi, L., and Cocker III, D. R.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from the photooxidation of isoprene, 1,3-butadiene,
and 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene under high NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 7301–7317, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7301-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7301-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, H., Derognat, C., Vautard, R., and Beekmann, M.: A comparison of
simulated and observed ozone mixing ratios for the summer of 1998 in Western
Europe, Atmos. Environ., 35, 6277–6297, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00451-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00451-4</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Fast, J., Easter, R., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Zaveri, R. A.,
Jimenez, J. L., Saide, P., and Hodzic, A.: Modeling organic aerosols in a
megacity: comparison of simple and complex representations of the volatility
basis set approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6639–6662,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6639-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6639-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Stier, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Kinne, S., and Boucher, O.: Aerosol absorption
and radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5237–5261,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5237-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5237-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Murphy, S. M., Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Hildebrandt, L.,
Sorooshian, A., Szmigielski, R., Vermeylen, R., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemical composition of secondary organic
aerosol formed from the photooxidation of isoprene, J. Phys. Chem., 110,
9665–9690, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Suzuki, T., Ohtaguchi, K., and Koide, K.: Application of Principal
Components-Analysis to Calculate Henry Constant from Molecular-Structure,
Comput. Chem., 16, 41–52, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-l" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-l</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Tan, Y., Lim, Y. B., Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S. P., and Turpin, B. J.:
Mechanisms leading to oligomers and SOA through aqueous photooxidation:
insights from OH radical oxidation of acetic acid and methylglyoxal, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 801–813, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-801-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-801-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Troen, I. and Mahrt, L.: A Simple-Model of the Atmospheric Boundary-Layer –
Sensitivity to Surface Evaporation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 37, 129–148,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00122760" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00122760</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Trump, E. R. and Donahue, N. M: Oligomer formation within secondary organic
aerosols: equilibrium and dynamic considerations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
3691–3701, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3691-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3691-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Valorso, R., Aumont, B., Camredon, M., Raventos-Duran, T., Mouchel-Vallon,
C., Ng, N. L., Seinfeld, J. H., Lee-Taylor, J., and Madronich, S.: Explicit
modelling of SOA formation from a-pinene photooxidation: sensitivity to
vapour pressure estimation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6895–6910,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6895-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6895-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Verwer, J. G.: Gauss-Seidel Iteration for Stiff ODEs from Chemical Kinetics,
SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 5, 1243–1250, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Vestreng, V., Breivik, K., Adams, M., Wagner, A., Goodwin, J., Rozovskaya,
O., and Pacyna, J. M.: Inventory Review 2005 – Emission Data reported to
CLRTAP and under the NEC Directive – Initial review for HMs and POPs,
EMEP/MSC-W, available at:
<uri>http://www.emep.int/publ/reports/2005/emep_technical_1_2005.pdf</uri> (last
access: 8 April 2016), 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Jimenez, J. L., San Martini, F., Dzepina, K., Zhang, Q.,
Salcedo, D., Molina, L. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Molina, M. J.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher
than expected, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17811, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl026899</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Wang, C., Goss, K.-U., Lei, Y. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Wania, F.:
Calculating Equilibrium Phase Distribution during the Formation of Secondary
Organic Aerosol Using COSMO<italic>therm</italic>, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
8585–8594, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b01584</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Wesely, M. L.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry
deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23,
1293–1304, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Xue, J., Lau, A. K. H., and Yu, J. Z.: A study of acidity on PM(2.5) in Hong
Kong using online ionic chemical composition measurements, Atmos. Environ.,
45, 7081–7088, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L.,
Dzepina, K., Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch,
T., Jayne, J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl029979</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Huang, J.-P., Henze, D. K., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Role of isoprene
in secondary organic aerosol formation on a regional scale, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D20207, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008675" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008675</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Oligomer formation in the troposphere: from experimental knowledge to 3-D
modeling</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The organic fraction of atmospheric aerosols has proven to be a critical
element of air quality and climate issues. However, its composition and the
aging processes it undergoes remain insufficiently understood. This work
builds on laboratory knowledge to simulate the formation of oligomers from
biogenic secondary organic aerosol (BSOA) in the troposphere at the
continental scale. We compare the results of two different modeling
approaches, a first-order kinetic process and a pH-dependent
parameterization, both implemented in the CHIMERE air quality model (AQM) (<a href="www.lmd.polytechnique.fr/chimere" target="_blank">www.lmd.polytechnique.fr/chimere</a>),
to simulate the spatial and temporal distribution of oligomerized secondary organic aerosol (SOA) over
western Europe. We also included a comparison of organic carbon (OC) concentrations at two EMEP (European Monitoring
and Evaluation Programme)
stations. Our results show that there is a strong dependence of the results
on the selected modeling approach: while the irreversible kinetic process
leads to the oligomerization of about 50 % of the total BSOA mass, the
pH-dependent approach shows a broader range of impacts, with a strong
dependency on environmental parameters (pH and nature of aerosol) and the
possibility for the process to be reversible. In parallel, we investigated
the sensitivity of each modeling approach to the representation of SOA
precursor solubility (Henry's law constant values). Finally, the pros and
cons of each approach for the representation of SOA aging are discussed and
recommendations are provided to improve current representations of oligomer
formation in AQMs.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aksoyoglu, S., Keller, J., Barmpadimos, I., Oderbolz, D., Lanz, V. A.,
Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Aerosol modelling in Europe
with a focus on Switzerland during summer and winter episodes, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 7355–7373, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7355-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-7355-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bessagnet, B., Hodzic, A., Vautard, R., Beekmann, M., Cheinet, S., Honore,
C., Liousse, C., and Rouil, L.: Aerosol modeling with CHIMERE – preliminary
evaluation at the continental scale, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2803–2817,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.034" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.034</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bessagnet, B., Menut, L., Curci, G., Hodzic, A., Guillaume, B., Liousse, C.,
Moukhtar, S., Pun, B., Seigneur, C., and Schulz, M.: Regional modeling of
carbonaceous aerosols over Europe-focus on secondary organic aerosols, J.
Atmos. Chem., 61, 175–202, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10874-009-9129-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10874-009-9129-2</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bessagnet, B., Menut, L., Curci, G., Hodzic, A., Guillaume, B., Liousse, C.,
Moukhtar, S., Pun, B., Seigneur, C., and Schulz, M.: Regional modeling of
carbonaceous aerosols over Europe-focus on secondary organic aerosols, J.
Atmos. Chem., 61, 175–202, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S. P., Mathur, R.,
Roselle, S. J., and Weber, R. J.: CMAQ Model Performance Enhanced When
In-Cloud Secondary Organic Aerosol is Included: Comparisons of Organic Carbon
Predictions with Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 8798–8802,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es801192n" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es801192n</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary
Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9,
4987–5005, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Carlton, A. G., Bhave, P. V., Napelenok, S. L., Edney, E. D., Sarwar, G.,
Pinder, R. W., Pouliot, G. A., and Houyoux, M.: Model Representation of
Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44,
8553–8560, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es100636q" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es100636q</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, W. P. L.: A Detailed Mechanism for the Gas-Phase Atmospheric
Reactions of Organic-Compounds, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen., 24, 481–518,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90005-8" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0960-1686(90)90005-8</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Couvidat, F. and Sartelet, K.: The Secondary Organic Aerosol Processor
(SOAP v1.0) model: a unified model with different ranges of complexity based
on the molecular surrogate approach, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1111–1138,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1111-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-8-1111-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Couvidat, F. and Seigneur, C.: Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation
from isoprene oxidation under dry and humid conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 893–909, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-893-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-893-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Couvidat, F., Debry, E., Sartelet, K., and Seigneur, C.: A
hydrophilic/hydrophobic organic (H<sup>2</sup>O) aerosol model: Developmentn
evaluation and sensitivity analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D10304,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017214" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JD017214</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Claeys, M., Graham, B., Vas, G., Wang, W., Vermeylen, R., Pashynska, V.,
Cafmeyer, J., Guyon, P., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., and Maenhaut, W.:
Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosol Through Photooxidation of Isoprene,
Science, 303, 1173–1176, 10.1126/science.1092805, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric organic
particulate matter: From smoke to secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Environ.,
43, 94–106, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dudhia, J.: A nonhydrostatic Version of the Penn State-NCAR Mesoscale Model:
Validation Tests and Simulation of an Atlantic Cyclone and Cold Front, Mon.
Weather Rev., 121, 1493–1513, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
El Haddad, I., Yao Liu, Nieto-Gligorovski, L., Michaud, V., Temime-Roussel,
B., Quivet, E., Marchand, N., Sellegri, K., and Monod, A.: In-cloud processes
of methacrolein under simulated conditions – Part 2: Formation of secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5107–5117,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5107-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-5107-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol
formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of
laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Ervens, B., Renard, P., Tlili, S., Ravier, S., Clément, J.-L., and Monod,
A.: Aqueous-phase oligomerization of methyl vinyl ketone through
photooxidation – Part 2: Development of the chemical mechanism and
atmospheric implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9109–9127,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9109-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-9109-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fountoukis, C., Nenes, A., Sullivan, A., Weber, R., Van Reken, T., Fischer,
M., Matías, E., Moya, M., Farmer, D., and Cohen, R. C.: Thermodynamic
characterization of Mexico City aerosol during MILAGRO 2006, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 2141–2156, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2141-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-2141-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fuzzi, S., Andreae, M. O., Huebert, B. J., Kulmala, M., Bond, T. C., Boy, M.,
Doherty, S. J., Guenther, A., Kanakidou, M., Kawamura, K., Kerminen, V.-M.,
Lohmann, U., Russell, L. M., and Pöschl, U.: Critical assessment of the
current state of scientific knowledge, terminology, and research needs
concerning the role of organic aerosols in the atmosphere, climate, and
global change, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2017–2038,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2017-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-2017-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, S., Ng, N. L., Keywood, M., Varutbangkul, V., Bahreini, R., Nenes, A.,
He, J. W., Yoo, K. Y., Beauchamp, J. L., Hodyss, R. P., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Particle phase acidity and oligomer formation in secondary
organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 6582–6589,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es049125k" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es049125k</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gelbard, F. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Simulation of Multicomponent Aerosol
Dynamics, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 78, 485–501,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(80)90587-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0021-9797(80)90587-1</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Is the gas-particle
partitioning in alpha-pinene secondary organic aerosol reversible?, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L14810, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029987" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL029987</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3181–3210, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hall IV, W. A. and Johnston, M. V.: The Thermal-Stability of Oligomers in
Alpha-Pinene Secondary Organic Aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 983–989,
2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hall IV, W. A. and Johnston, M.: Oligomer Formation Pathways in Secondary
Organic Aerosol from MS and MS/MS Measurements with High Mass Accuracy and
Resolving Power, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr., 23, 1097–1108, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hauglustaine, D., Hourdin, F., Jourdain, L., Filiberti, M.-A., Walters, S.,
Lamarque, J.-F., and Holland, E.: Interactive chemistry in the Laboratoire de
Météorologie Dynamique general circulation model: Description and
background tropospheric chemistry evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D04314, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003957" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD003957</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Heald, C. L., Coe, H., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Bahreini, R.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Russell, L. M., Jolleys, M., Fu, T.-M., Allan, J. D.,
Bower, K. N., Capes, G., Crosier, J., Morgan, W. T., Robinson, N. H.,
Williams, P. I., Cubison, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., and Dunlea, E. J.: Exploring
the vertical profile of atmospheric organic aerosol: comparing 17 aircraft
field campaigns with a global model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12673–12696,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Heaton, K. J., Dreyfus, M. A., Wang, S., and Johnston, M. V.: Oligomers in
the early stage of biogenic secondary organic aerosol formation and growth,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6129–6136, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A
critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of
atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, H.: Kinetics of Aqueous Phase Reactions Relevant for Atmospheric
Chemistry, Chem. Rev., 103, 4691–4716, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Jang, M. S., Czoschke, N. M., and Northcross, A. L.: Semiempirical model for
organic aerosol growth by acid-catalyzed heterogeneous reactions of organic
carbonyls, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 164–174, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es048977h" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es048977h</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A.
C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M.,
Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger,
U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere,
Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kalberer, M., Paulsen, D., Sax, M., Steinbacher, M., Dommen, J., Prevot, A.
S. H., Fisseha, R., Weingartner, E., Frankevich, V., Zenobi, R., and
Baltensperger, U.: Identification of polymers as major components of
atmospheric organic aerosols, Science, 303, 1659–1662,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1092185</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kalberer, M., Sax, M., and Samburova, V.: Molecular Size Evolution of
Oligomers in Organic Aerosols Collected in Urban Atmospheres and Generated in
a Smog Chamber, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5917–5922, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J.,
Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J.,
Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat,
G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E.,
Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate
modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Maben, J. R., Stevenson, E., and Wall, A. C.
D.: Closure evaluation of size-resolved aerosol pH in the New England coastal
atmosphere during summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D23307, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004801" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD004801</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., and Edney,
E. O.: The formation of secondary organic aerosol from the isoprene + OH
reaction in the absence of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6541–6558,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6541-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-6541-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol:
Formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 3593–3624, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.003</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Isoprene Photooxidation, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40, 1869–1877, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J. H., Smith, J. D., Che, D. L., Kessler, S. H., Worsnop, D. R., and
Wilson, K. R.: Measurement of fragmentation and functionalization pathways in
the heterogeneous oxidation of oxidized organic aerosol, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8005–8014, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., and Pirjola, L.: Parameterizations for sulfuric
acid/water nucleation rates, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 8301–8307,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97jd03718" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/97jd03718</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, Y.-H., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Chu, K., Siejack, R. A., Zhang, H.,
Riva, M., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Kautzman, K. E., and Surratt, J. D.:
Light-absorbing oligomer formation in secondary organic aerosol from reactive
uptake of isoprene epoxydiols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12012–12021,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., Monod, A., Tritscher, T., Praplan, A. P., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Temime-Roussel, B., Quivet, E., Marchand, N., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger,
U.: Aqueous phase processing of secondary organic aerosol from isoprene
photooxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5879–5895,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5879-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-5879-2012</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., Siekmann, F., Renard, P., El Zein, A., Salque, G., El Haddad, I.,
Temime-Roussel, B., Voisin, D., Thissen, R., and Monod, A.: Oligomer and SOA
formation through aqueous phase photooxidation of methacrolein and methyl
vinyl ketone, Atmos. Environ., 49, 123–129, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Ludwig, J. and Klemm, O.: Acidity of Size-Fractionated Aerosol-Particles,
Water Air Soil Poll., 49, 35–50, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00279508" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/bf00279508</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Menut, L., Bessagnet, B., Khvorostyanov, D., Beekmann, M., Blond, N.,
Colette, A., Coll, I., Curci, G., Foret, G., Hodzic, A., Mailler, S., Meleux,
F., Monge, J.-L., Pison, I., Siour, G., Turquety, S., Valari, M., Vautard,
R., and Vivanco, M. G.: CHIMERE 2013: a model for regional atmospheric
composition modelling, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 981–1028,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-981-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-6-981-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Mikhailov, E., Vlasenko, S., Rose, D., and Pöschl, U.: Mass-based
hygroscopicity parameter interaction model and measurement of atmospheric
aerosol water uptake, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 717–740,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-717-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-717-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Molnar, A. and Meszaros, E.: On the relation between the size and chemical
composition of aerosol particles and their optical properties, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 5053–5058, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00314-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00314-4</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Morris, R. E., Bonyoung, K., Guenther, A., Yarwood, G., McNally, D., Tesche,
T. W., Tonnesen, G., Boylan, J., and Brewer, P.: Model sensitivity evaluation
for organic carbon using two multi-pollutant air quality models that simulate
regional haze in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 40,
4960–4972, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Mouchel-Vallon, C., Bräuer, P., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Madronich, S.,
Herrmann, H., and Aumont, B.: Explicit modeling of volatile organic compounds
partitioning in the atmospheric aqueous phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
1023–1037, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1023-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-1023-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Moya, M., Pandis, S. N., and Jacobson, M. Z.: Is the size distribution of
urban aerosols determined by thermodynamic equilibrium?: An application to
Southern California, Atmos. Environ., 36, 2349–2365, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1009604003981" target="_blank">doi:10.1023/a:1009604003981</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Roach, P. J., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of humidity on the composition of isoprene photooxidation secondary
organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6931–6944,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-6931-2011</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen, T. B., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Nitrogen-containing organic compounds and oligomers in secondary organic
aerosol formed by photooxidation of isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45,
6908–6918, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Ovadnevaite, J., O'Dowd, C., Dall'Osto, M., and Ceburnis, D.: Detecting high
contributions of primary organic matter to marine aerosol: A case study,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L02807, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046083" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GL046083</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Pandis, S. N., Paulson, S. E., Seinfeld, J. H., and Flagan, R. C.: Aerosol
formation in the photooxidation of isoprene and <i>β</i>-pinene, Atmos.
Environ. A-Gen., 25, 997–1008, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Pankow, J. F.: An Absorption-Model of Gas-Particle Partitioning of
Organic-Compounds in the Atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 28, 185–188,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90093-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/1352-2310(94)90093-0</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Paredes-Miranda, G., Arnott, W. P., Jimenez, J. L., Aiken, A. C., Gaffney, J.
S., and Marley, N. A.: Primary and secondary contributions to aerosol light
scattering and absorption in Mexico City during the MILAGRO 2006 campaign,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3721–3730, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3721-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-3721-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Paulot, F., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kroll, J. H., Seinfeld, J. H.,
and Wennberg, P. O.: Isoprene photooxidation: new insights into the
production of acids and organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1479–1501,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1479-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-1479-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Petetin, H., Beekmann, M., Sciare, J., Bressi, M., Rosso, A., Sanchez, O.,
and Ghersi, V.: A novel model evaluation approach focusing on local and
advected contributions to urban PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels – application to Paris,
France, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1483–1505, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1483-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1483-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Pun, B. K.: Development and initial application of the sesquiversion of
MADRID, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D12212, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009888" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008jd009888</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Pun, B. K. and Seigneur, C.: Investigative modeling of new pathways for
secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2199–2216,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2199-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-2199-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Pun, B. K., Seigneur, C., and Lohman, K.: Modeling secondary organic aerosol
formation via multiphase partitioning with molecular data, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 40, 4722–4731, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0522736" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es0522736</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Raventos-Duran, T., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C., and
Aumont, B.: Structure-activity relationships to estimate the effective
Henry's law constants of organics of atmospheric interest, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 7643–7654, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7643-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-10-7643-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Renard, P., Siekmann, F., Gandolfo, A., Socorro, J., Salque, G., Ravier, S.,
Quivet, E., Clément, J.-L., Traikia, M., Delort, A.-M., Voisin, D.,
Vuitton, V., Thissen, R., and Monod, A.: Radical mechanisms of methyl vinyl
ketone oligomerization through aqueous phase OH-oxidation: on the paradoxical
role of dissolved molecular oxygen, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6473–6491,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6473-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-6473-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Renard, P., Siekmann, F., Salque, G., Demelas, C., Coulomb, B., Vassalo, L.,
Ravier, S., Temime-Roussel, B., Voisin, D., and Monod, A.: Aqueous-phase
oligomerization of methyl vinyl ketone through photooxidation – Part 1:
Aging processes of oligomers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 21–35,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-21-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-21-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage,
A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.:
Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging,
Science, 315, 1259–1261, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Sato, K., Nakao, S., Clark, C. H., Qi, L., and Cocker III, D. R.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from the photooxidation of isoprene, 1,3-butadiene,
and 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene under high NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> conditions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 7301–7317, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7301-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-7301-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, H., Derognat, C., Vautard, R., and Beekmann, M.: A comparison of
simulated and observed ozone mixing ratios for the summer of 1998 in Western
Europe, Atmos. Environ., 35, 6277–6297, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00451-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00451-4</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Fast, J., Easter, R., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Zaveri, R. A.,
Jimenez, J. L., Saide, P., and Hodzic, A.: Modeling organic aerosols in a
megacity: comparison of simple and complex representations of the volatility
basis set approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6639–6662,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6639-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-6639-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Stier, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Kinne, S., and Boucher, O.: Aerosol absorption
and radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5237–5261,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5237-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-5237-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Murphy, S. M., Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Hildebrandt, L.,
Sorooshian, A., Szmigielski, R., Vermeylen, R., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M.,
Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemical composition of secondary organic
aerosol formed from the photooxidation of isoprene, J. Phys. Chem., 110,
9665–9690, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Suzuki, T., Ohtaguchi, K., and Koide, K.: Application of Principal
Components-Analysis to Calculate Henry Constant from Molecular-Structure,
Comput. Chem., 16, 41–52, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-l" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0097-8485(92)85007-l</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, Y., Lim, Y. B., Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S. P., and Turpin, B. J.:
Mechanisms leading to oligomers and SOA through aqueous photooxidation:
insights from OH radical oxidation of acetic acid and methylglyoxal, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 12, 801–813, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-801-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-801-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Troen, I. and Mahrt, L.: A Simple-Model of the Atmospheric Boundary-Layer –
Sensitivity to Surface Evaporation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 37, 129–148,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00122760" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/bf00122760</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Trump, E. R. and Donahue, N. M: Oligomer formation within secondary organic
aerosols: equilibrium and dynamic considerations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
3691–3701, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3691-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-3691-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Valorso, R., Aumont, B., Camredon, M., Raventos-Duran, T., Mouchel-Vallon,
C., Ng, N. L., Seinfeld, J. H., Lee-Taylor, J., and Madronich, S.: Explicit
modelling of SOA formation from a-pinene photooxidation: sensitivity to
vapour pressure estimation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6895–6910,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6895-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-6895-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Verwer, J. G.: Gauss-Seidel Iteration for Stiff ODEs from Chemical Kinetics,
SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 5, 1243–1250, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Vestreng, V., Breivik, K., Adams, M., Wagner, A., Goodwin, J., Rozovskaya,
O., and Pacyna, J. M.: Inventory Review 2005 – Emission Data reported to
CLRTAP and under the NEC Directive – Initial review for HMs and POPs,
EMEP/MSC-W, available at:
<a href="http://www.emep.int/publ/reports/2005/emep_technical_1_2005.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.emep.int/publ/reports/2005/emep_technical_1_2005.pdf</a> (last
access: 8 April 2016), 2005.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Volkamer, R., Jimenez, J. L., San Martini, F., Dzepina, K., Zhang, Q.,
Salcedo, D., Molina, L. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Molina, M. J.: Secondary
organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher
than expected, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17811, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026899" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006gl026899</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C., Goss, K.-U., Lei, Y. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Wania, F.:
Calculating Equilibrium Phase Distribution during the Formation of Secondary
Organic Aerosol Using COSMO<i>therm</i>, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
8585–8594, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01584" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01584</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Wesely, M. L.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry
deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23,
1293–1304, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Xue, J., Lau, A. K. H., and Yu, J. Z.: A study of acidity on PM(2.5) in Hong
Kong using online ionic chemical composition measurements, Atmos. Environ.,
45, 7081–7088, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H.,
Ulbrich, I., Alfarra, M. R., Takami, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Sun, Y. L.,
Dzepina, K., Dunlea, E., Docherty, K., DeCarlo, P. F., Salcedo, D., Onasch,
T., Jayne, J. T., Miyoshi, T., Shimono, A., Hatakeyama, S., Takegawa, N.,
Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian,
K., Williams, P., Bower, K., Bahreini, R., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R. J.,
Rautiainen, J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Ubiquity and
dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in
anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, L13801, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007gl029979" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007gl029979</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Huang, J.-P., Henze, D. K., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Role of isoprene
in secondary organic aerosol formation on a regional scale, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D20207, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008675" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD008675</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
