<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-8-3733-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Updating sea spray aerosol emissions in the Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0.2</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Sea spray aerosol emissions in the CMAQ model}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B.~Gantt et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Gantt</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kelly</surname><given-names>J. T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6574-5714</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bash</surname><given-names>J. O.</given-names></name>
          <email>bash.jesse@epa.gov</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8736-0102</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National
Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US
Environmental Protection Agency, RTP, NC, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, US
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC,
USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">J. O. Bash (bash.jesse@epa.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>3733</fpage><lpage>3746</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Sea spray aerosols (SSAs) impact the particle mass concentration and
gas-particle partitioning in coastal environments, with implications for
human and ecosystem health. Model evaluations of SSA emissions have mainly
focused on the global scale, but regional-scale evaluations are also
important due to the localized impact of SSAs on atmospheric chemistry near
the coast. In this study, SSA emissions in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model were updated to enhance the fine-mode size
distribution, include sea surface temperature (SST) dependency, and reduce
surf-enhanced emissions. Predictions from the updated CMAQ model and those
of the previous release version, CMAQv5.0.2, were evaluated using several
coastal and national observational data sets in the continental US. The
updated emissions generally reduced model underestimates of sodium,
chloride, and nitrate surface concentrations for coastal sites in the Bay
Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (BRACE) near Tampa, Florida.
Including SST dependency to the SSA emission parameterization led to
increased sodium concentrations in the southeastern US and decreased
concentrations along parts of the Pacific coast and northeastern US. The
influence of sodium on the gas-particle partitioning of nitrate resulted in
higher nitrate particle concentrations in many coastal urban areas due to
increased condensation of nitric acid in the updated simulations,
potentially affecting the predicted nitrogen deposition in sensitive
ecosystems. Application of the updated SSA emissions to the California
Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) study
period resulted in a modest improvement in the predicted surface concentration
of sodium and nitrate at several central and southern California coastal
sites. This update of SSA emissions enabled a more realistic simulation of
the atmospheric chemistry in coastal environments where marine air mixes
with urban pollution.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Sea spray aerosols (SSAs) contribute significantly to the global aerosol
burden, both in terms of mass (Lewis and Schwartz, 2004) and cloud
condensation nuclei concentration (Murphy et al., 1998; Pierce and Adams,
2006; Clarke et al., 2006; Blot et al., 2013). The chemical composition of
SSAs (e.g., major ions: Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ca<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Tang et al., 1997) is affected
by atmospheric processing, with the uptake of nitric acid (Gard et al.,
1998, and references therein), sulfuric acid (McInnes et al., 1994),
dicarboxylic acids (Sullivan and Prather, 2007), and methylsulfonic acid
(Hopkins et al., 2008) shown to be important processes. Sea spray aerosols
also influence gas-phase atmospheric chemistry via displacement of chlorine
and bromine from the particle phase and subsequent impacts on ozone
formation and destruction (Yang et al., 2005; Long et al., 2014). Despite
this importance, much uncertainty remains in the factors affecting the
size-dependent production flux per whitecap area, which drives the emission
rates in most chemical transport models (de Leeuw et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>An active area of recent research has been in the determination of the SSA
size distribution. The size distribution of particles influences their
atmospheric lifetime, surface area available for heterogeneous reactions,
cloud condensation nuclei efficiency, and optical properties. A widely used
SSA emission parameterization in early chemical transport models was
described by Monahan et al. (1986), which predicts the size distribution
between 0.8 and 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in dry diameter based on laboratory
measurements. To address the overpredicted SSA emission rate when the
parameterization from Monahan et al. (1986) was extended to aerosol dry
diameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Andreas, 1998; Vignati et al., 2001),
Gong (2003) revised the Monahan et al. (1986) parameterization to match the
SSA size distribution observed in the North Atlantic (O'Dowd et al., 1997)
down to a 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m dry diameter. Since the publication of
Gong (2003), several studies have examined the size distribution of SSAs
generated in the laboratory and measured in field campaigns (Mårtensson
et al., 2003; Clarke et al., 2006; Sellegri et al., 2006; Keene et al., 2007;
Tyree et al., 2007; Norris et al., 2008; Fuentes et al., 2010). In a review
of SSA emission measurements from both laboratory- and field-based studies,
de Leeuw et al. (2011) showed a broad range (0.05–0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in dry
diameter) of particle sizes having the maximum number production flux. Recent
SSA production parameterizations (see Grythe et al., 2014) reflect these
measurements, with most having a production rate maximum at aerosol sizes
lower than the lower cutoff (0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m dry diameter) of Gong (2003).
Recent updates to the SSA emission parameterization in the Weather Research
and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF–Chem) increased predicted
submicron sodium mass concentrations over the northeastern Atlantic Ocean by
up to 20 % (Archer-Nicholls et al., 2014). Due to the lack of detailed
submicron measurements at the time, the Gong (2003) parameterization was
given as

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.373</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>3.41</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.7</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.017</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.057</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn>3.45</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.607</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.433</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.433</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is the SSA number flux with units of
m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle radius in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m at
80 % relative humidity, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the 10 m wind speed in m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is an adjustable shape parameter that controlled the submicron
size distribution. Gong (2003) tested <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values between 15 and 40,
suggesting (with limited observational evidence) a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 30.</p>
      <p>Seawater temperature can increase or decrease SSA number emissions by up to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 % due to the temperature dependency of surface tension,
density, viscosity, and air entrainment (Mårtensson et al., 2003;
Sellegri et al., 2006; Zábori et al., 2012a; Ovadnevaite et al., 2014;
Callaghan et al., 2014). Mårtensson et al. (2003), Sellegri et
al. (2006), and Zábori et al. (2012a) all observed a negative temperature
dependence for the production flux of SSAs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 nm diameter in synthetic
seawater laboratory experiments. Similar negative temperature dependencies
are measured in SSAs generated from Arctic Ocean seawater (Zábori et al.,
2012b). Mårtensson et al. (2003) and Sellegri et al. (2006) also reported
positive temperature dependencies for the SSA production flux for particles
larger than 70 nm in diameter. This difference in the temperature dependence
of small and large SSA emissions is likely due to their bubble size
dependence and impact of SSTs on small and large bubbles (Sellegri et al.,
2006). Sofiev et al. (2011) developed a size-dependent temperature correction
factor for SSA emissions reflecting the different temperature dependencies of
fine- and coarse-mode aerosols. A global comparison of observed and
model-predicted coarse-mode sea salt concentrations in Jaeglé et
al. (2011) led to the development of a third-order polynomial function for
the SST dependence of the Gong (2003) SSA emission parameterization. Grythe
et al. (2014) compares the Jaeglé et al. (2011) and Sofiev et al. (2011)
temperature dependencies, finding that the Jaeglé et al. (2011) function
gives the best model improvement to the observed temperature dependence.
Modeling studies implementing the Jaeglé et al. (2011)
temperature-dependent SSA emissions have shown improved prediction of surface
sea salt mass concentration (Spada et al., 2013; Grythe et al., 2014)
relative to temperature-independent emissions. Using a process-based approach
incorporating seawater viscosity and wave state, Ovadnevaite et al. (2014)
found a positive temperature dependence of SSA emissions similar to
Jaeglé et al. (2011) but resembling a linear (rather than third-order
polynomial) relationship.</p>
      <p>In addition to bubble bursting in the open ocean, SSAs can be emitted via
wave breaking in the surf zone covering an area roughly 20 to 100 m
from the coastline (Petelski and Chomka, 1996; Lewis and Schwartz, 2004).
Surf-zone SSA emissions have been shown to be enhanced relative to the open
ocean, resulting in higher sea salt concentrations near the coast (de Leeuw
et al., 2000). Vignati et al. (2001) concluded that surf-zone SSA emissions
provide additional surface for heterogeneous reactions and impact the
atmospheric chemistry of coastal areas. There are limited observations and
large uncertainties in the surf-zone SSA emissions related to the zone width
and whitecap coverage, with de Leeuw et al. (2000) observing a 30 m wide
surf zone with an assumed 100 % whitecap fraction on the California coast
and Clarke et al. (2006) observing a mean whitecap fraction in the 35 m
wide surf zone of 40 % in Hawaii. The inclusion of surf-zone emissions
increases sodium and chloride concentrations by a factor of 10 and improves
the predicted concentration of particulate matter (PM) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
in diameter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by up to 20 % in the eastern Mediterranean (Im,
2013).</p>
      <p>The current SSA treatment in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ)
model version 5.0.2 is described by Kelly et al. (2010) and includes the
open-ocean emissions of Gong (2003), surf-enhanced emissions similar to de
Leeuw et al. (2000) in which a fixed whitecap coverage of 100 % is applied
to the Gong (2003) parameterization for a 50 m wide surf zone, and dynamic
transfer of HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between coarse-mode particles and the gas phase. Based on comparison with observations from
three Tampa, Florida sites at different distances from the coastline, Kelly
et al. (2010) found that enhancing sea spray emissions in surf-zone-containing grid cells by assuming a 50 m wide surf-zone width and
100 % whitecap coverage improved CMAQ model underprediction of sodium,
chloride, and nitrate concentrations (particularly at the coastal site)
relative to a simulation with only the Gong (2003) open-ocean emissions. The
dynamic transfer of HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between
coarse particles and the gas phase as implemented by Kelly et al. (2010)
further improves predicted concentrations of semi-volatile species like
chloride and nitrate. Despite these improvements, persistent
underpredictions of sodium, chloride, and nitrate concentrations at the
inland site remain unresolved. In this work, we expand upon the Kelly et al. (2010) CMAQ SSA emission treatment by updating the fine-mode size
distribution, SST dependence, and surf-enhanced emissions to reflect recent
SSA research. Due to the advanced treatment of SSA chemistry in CMAQ, their
emissions can be evaluated using concentrations of the directly emitted
sea salt components such as sodium and species such as nitrate that react
with sea salt components in the atmosphere. Specifically, we hypothesize
that the improved prediction of sodium will correspond to improvements in
the gas-particle partitioning of nitrate aerosol as suggested by Kelly et
al. (2014). The goal of this work is to improve the size distribution,
magnitude, and spatiotemporal variability of CMAQ-predicted SSA emissions
and the resulting impacts on atmospheric chemistry in coastal and inland
areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Observational data sets</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Change in the <bold>(a)</bold> fine mode and <bold>(b)</bold> total surface sodium
concentration between the revised and baseline simulations for May 2002 over
the continental US and BRACE domains with sites from left to right:
Azalea Park, Gandy Bridge, and Sydney as green dots.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Two field campaigns with different meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, and
SSA sources from oceans having distinct surface temperatures and bathymetry
were used to evaluate the updated emissions. The Bay Regional Atmospheric
Chemistry Experiment (BRACE) (Atkeson et al., 2007; Nolte et al., 2008) was
conducted from May to June 2002 at three sites (Azalea Park: 27.78<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
82.74<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W;
Gandy Bridge: 27.89<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 82.54<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W; and Sydney: 27.97<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 82.23<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) around Tampa Bay,
FL (see Fig. 1). These three sites represent coastal (Azalea Park),
bayside (Gandy Bridge), and inland (Sydney) regions, and roughly 1, 25, and
50 km from the Gulf of Mexico coastline. Size-resolved measurements of
inorganic PM composition were made with four micro-orifice cascade
impactors, which operated for 23 h per sample at ambient relative humidity
(Evans et al., 2004). The cascade impactors had 8–10 fractionated stages
ranging from 0.056 to 18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in aerodynamic diameter, and two cascade
impactors were collocated at the Sydney site. Additionally, particulate
nitrate and nitric acid were measured under ambient relative humidity
conditions at a high temporal resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 min) using a soluble
particle collector employing ion chromatography (Dasgupta et al., 2007) and
denuder difference (Arnold et al., 2007).</p>
      <p>The California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change
(CalNex) 2010 field project was conducted from May to July 2010 throughout
California. The goal of the study was to simultaneously measure variables
affected by emissions, atmospheric transport and dispersion, atmospheric
chemical processing, and cloud–aerosol interactions and aerosol radiative
effects (Ryerson et al., 2013). The South Coast portion of the CalNex
campaign included continuous ground-based measurements of
PM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
in diameter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition using particle-into-liquid
sampling and ion chromatography (Weber et al., 2001) and the mixing ratio of
many gases at Pasadena, CA (34.14<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 118.12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 km from the Pacific coast). Here, we evaluated CMAQ for
June 2010 to coincide with surface concentrations of sodium and nitrate
measured continuously at Pasadena and as daily averages every 3 days at
sites operated by the national Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) within the
South Coast, San Francisco Bay, and San Diego air basins. Hereafter, these
CSN sites and the Pasadena site will collectively be referred to as the
coastal CalNex sites. Although the CalNex campaign also included ship-based
measurements of aerosol composition in conjunction with the Sea Sweep (Bates
et al., 2012; Crisp et al., 2014), the portion of the cruise that took place
in June 2010 was mainly in the vicinity of San Francisco Bay in close
proximity to several CSN sites already included in the evaluation. For the
CalNex comparison, the sum of the Aitken and accumulation modes was used as
the model comparison. However, a comprehensive evaluation of size-resolved
inorganic particle composition from Nolte et al. (2015) shows that the
difference in the sum of the Aitken and accumulation modes and PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %.</p>
      <p>In addition to local field campaigns, we evaluated SSA emissions in CMAQ
against surface PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of sodium and nitrate measured
throughout the continental US (CONUS) as part of the Interagency Monitoring
of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) for remote/rural locations and CSN
for urban locations during the May 2002 BRACE time period. Daily average
sodium mass concentrations in the IMPROVE and CSN networks were measured once
every 3 days via tube-generated X-ray fluorescence (XRF) (White, 2008).
Nitrate concentrations for both the IMPROVE and CSN networks are determined
by ion chromatography. During the May 2002 period, the IMPROVE network
consisted of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 160 sites while the CSN network consisted of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 sites. Although we use the filter-based measurements from the
IMPROVE and CSN networks and BRACE campaign for direct model evaluation, we
acknowledge that they have uncertainties related to instrument sensitivity
and volatility (White, 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Model configuration</title>
      <p>In this work, we used the CMAQ model v5.0.2 to simulate the impact of updated
sea spray aerosol emissions on surface aerosol concentrations/size
distribution and gas-particle partitioning. CMAQ represents the aerosol size
distribution using three modes (Aitken, accumulation, and coarse) and
simulates inorganic aerosol thermodynamics using ISORROPIA II (Binkowski and
Roselle, 2003; Fountoukis and Nenes, 2007). Kelly et al. (2010) further
enhanced the SSA chemical treatment in CMAQ by allowing dynamic transfer of
HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between coarse particles and
the gas phase. For comparison with the CONUS observational data sets such as
IMPROVE and CSN, we used a model domain covering the continental US at
12 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 km horizontal resolution and 41 vertical layers with a
surface layer up to 20 m a.g.l. The simulation time period (1 May 2002 to
3 June 2002 with an 11 day spin-up) was made to coincide with the BRACE
campaign to enable additional evaluation of the coastal-to-inland changes in
the aerosol composition/size distribution and gas-particle partitioning.
Meteorological parameters were generated by the Weather Research Forecasting
model (WRF) version 3.1 (Skamarock et al., 2008), with initial and boundary
conditions generated from a previous CMAQ simulation and a GEOS-Chem global
model simulation, respectively. Detailed meteorological and emission inputs
can be found in Bash et al. (2013). For the CalNex comparison, we used a
model domain covering nearly all of California and Nevada as well as parts of
the Pacific Ocean, Mexico, and Arizona with 4 km horizontal resolution and
34 vertical layers. Chemical boundary conditions were derived from a
GEOS-Chem simulation (Henderson et al., 2014), and prognostic meteorological
fields used to drive CMAQ were generated with WRF version 3.4. Detailed
description of the meteorological and emission inputs can be found in Baker
et al. (2013) and Kelly et al. (2014). SST was taken from the Moderate
Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) composite for all simulations.</p>
      <p>As the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value primarily affects the fine-mode size distribution of
the Gong (2003) SSA production parameterization, adjusting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> allows
the user to change the (1) number flux without affecting the mass flux and (2) peak aerosol
size emitted (see Fig. S1 in the Supplement). These two changes can result in
higher downwind concentrations of sea salt components due to the reduced dry
deposition velocities of fine-mode aerosols relative to the coarse mode and
resulting increase in atmospheric lifetime. The higher downwind
concentration of sodium aerosol can increase the concentration of nitrate
aerosol by affecting the gas-particle partitioning of total inorganic
nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This increase, in turn, can increase
the nitrate lifetime as fine-mode NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a longer atmospheric
lifetime than gaseous HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both the sea salt and nitrate aerosol
concentrations at the Sydney inland site were found to be underpredicted in
CMAQ (Kelly et al., 2010). For this study, we used <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 30
(consistent with the current CMAQ representation, given as CMAQv5.0.2a or
“baseline”), 20 (CMAQv5.0.2b), 10 (CMAQv5.0.2c), and 8 (CMAQv5.0.2d),
which were expected to result in progressively higher emission rates of fin-
mode SSAs (see Fig. S1). For the simulations using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20, the lower limit of the SSA dry diameter is decreased to 10 nm to better
reflect changes in the emitted number size distribution (which peaks at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 170, 140, 80, and 60 nm dry diameter for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
30, 20, 10, and 8, respectively). This decrease was consistent with
measurements of Aitken mode SSAs (Clarke et al., 2006) and a recent global
modeling study evaluating different SSA emission parameterizations (Grythe
et al., 2014). The radius of peak emissions at 80 % relative humidity (RH)
from the Gong (2003) parameterization with a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 8 was
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 nm; this value was similar to the radius of maximum
production flux from several parameterizations reviewed in de Leeuw et al. (2011).</p>
      <p>Including the positive temperature dependence for SSA emissions in CMAQ was
expected to affect the seasonality and spatial distribution of predicted
concentrations. The Jaeglé et al. (2011) third-order polynomial function
of SST dependence for SSA emissions (CMAQv5.0.2e) increases the
summertime/tropical concentrations, decreases wintertime/polar
concentrations, and leaves mid-latitude/spring/autumn concentrations
relatively unchanged. The surf-zone width used in parameterizing the
surf-enhanced emissions was decreased from 50 to 25 m (CMAQv5.0.2f),
reflecting both the uncertainty in the width distance and whitecap fraction
within the surf zone. As SSA emissions from surf-zone-containing grids
impact a narrow region, adjusting the surf-zone width was expected to
strongly affect coastal concentrations while having a relatively minor
effect on downwind concentrations. We conducted two simulations to test the
combined effect of setting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SST dependence, and
surf-enhanced emissions (surf zone <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 m), with CMAQv5.0.2g using
the Jaeglé et al. (2011) third-order SST dependence and CMAQv5.0.2h
using a hybrid of the Jaeglé et al. (2011) third-order SST dependence
and the Ovadnevaite et al. (2014) process-based linear SST dependence (see
Fig. 12 from Ovadnevaite et al., 2014) for open-ocean emissions as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.054</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SST</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.373</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>3.41</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.7</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.017</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.057</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn>3.45</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.607</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.433</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.433</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where SST has units of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C. The updated SSA emission
parameterization given in Eq. (2) was mapped to the CMAQ aerosol modes as
a function of relative humidity following Zhang et al. (2005, 2006). A
summary of the different CMAQ model simulations in which SSA emissions were
changed is given in Table 1. The approach used in CMAQv5.0.2h, hereafter
referred to as the “revised” simulation, is planned to be included in the
next public release of CMAQ (version 5.1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Differences in the CMAQ model versions used in this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SST dependence</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Surf</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Zone (m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Baseline<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMAQv5.0.2b</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMAQv5.0.2c</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMAQv5.0.2d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMAQv5.0.2e</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jaeglé et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMAQv5.0.2f</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">None</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMAQv5.0.2g</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jaeglé et al. (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Revised<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jaeglé et al. (2011),</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ovadnevaite et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> This simulation is also referred to as the CMAQv5.0.2a simulation.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> In this simulation, which is also referred to as the CMAQv5.0.2h
simulation, the SST dependence of Jaeglé et al. (2011) has been
linearized following Ovadnevaite et al. (2014).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>A potential limitation of this study is the reliance on ambient surface
concentrations in the evaluation of modeled SSA emissions. Although all
model processes other than SSA emissions are left constant for the CMAQ
simulations listed above, the selection of deposition, transport, and
chemistry parameterizations within the model can affect the predicted
concentrations. Nolte et al. (2015) found that constraining the aerosol mode
widths and enabling gravitational settling for all model layers in CMAQ
affected the predicted coarse-mode sodium at the BRACE sites. Although
changes in the model chemistry would likely have a minor impact on the
Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> evaluations, future diagnostic evaluations that account for
deposition and transport uncertainties are advised.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>BRACE</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of the mean and Pearson's correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
total observed and model-predicted inorganic particle concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at three Bay Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (BRACE)
sites near Tampa, FL.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="18">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="18" colname="col18" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Obs.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Baseline<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1">v5.0.2b </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center" colsep="1">v5.0.2c </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col9" nameend="col10" align="center" colsep="1">v5.0.2d </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col11" nameend="col12" align="center" colsep="1">v5.0.2e </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col13" nameend="col14" align="center" colsep="1">v5.0.2f </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col15" nameend="col16" align="center">v5.0.2g </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col17" nameend="col18" align="center">Revised<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18">Azalea Park </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">2.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">1.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18">Gandy Bridge </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">1.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">2.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.81</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">1.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18">Sydney </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">1.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> This simulation is also referred to as the CMAQv5.0.2a simulation.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> This simulation is also referred to as the CMAQv5.0.2h simulation.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> predicted for the sum of Aitken and accumulation modes
(approximating PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; Nolte et al., 2015) and observed for aerosols
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in diameter.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>The total particulate (PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nitrate, chloride, and sodium
concentrations observed at the three sites during the BRACE campaign and
corresponding CMAQ-predicted concentrations for the baseline and sensitivity
simulations (v5.0.2b–h) are summarized in Table 2. The baseline simulation
predicted the magnitude of chloride and sodium at the coastal site (Azalea
Park) relatively well with normalized mean biases (NMBs) between 0 and
25 %. However, it increasingly underpredicted chloride and sodium as the
distance from the shore increased (at the inland Sydney site the sodium NMB
was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>41 %). The baseline simulation overestimated by approximately a
factor of 2 the observed decrease in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chloride and sodium
between the coastal Azalea Park and inland Sydney sites. The average
fine-mode sodium concentration (given as PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the measurements and
the sum of the Aitken and accumulation approximating PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Nolte et
al., 2015) for the model predictions) was consistently underpredicted by the
baseline simulation for the BRACE sites with an NMB of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.6 %. The
baseline simulation underpredicted nitrate concentrations for all sites with
a NMB of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46.4 %. As the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value was changed from 30 to 20
(v5.0.2b), the predicted PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chloride and sodium (and nitrate via
secondary processes) at the coastal Azalea Park site decreased slightly
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
despite an increase (by 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in fin-
mode sodium concentrations. This surprising result was due to slight
differences in the fitting of coarse-mode SSA emissions to CMAQ's aerosol
modes. The transition of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from 20 to 10 to 8 led to small
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 to 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or 10 %) increases in the
nitrate, chloride, and sodium concentrations relative to the baseline
simulation for all sites. Although it slightly overestimated chloride and
sodium at the coastal Azalea Park site, the v5.0.2d simulation with a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 8 had the best prediction (both in terms of magnitude and
correlation according to Table 2) of concentrations at the Gandy Bridge and
Sydney sites.</p>
      <p>The modeled chloride and sodium aerosol concentrations were much more
sensitive to the implementation of SST-dependent SSA emissions (v5.0.2e) and
reduction of the surf-zone width used for surf-enhanced SSA emissions
(v5.0.2f) than the changing of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. With the positive
temperature dependence of the Jaeglé et al. (2011) sea spray aerosol
emissions and warm (25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) Gulf of Mexico surface waters in May
(see Fig. S2), concentrations of nitrate, chloride, and sodium were
predicted to be higher (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 %) in the v5.0.2e simulation than
the baseline for all sites. The reduction in surf-enhanced emissions in the
v5.0.2f simulation had a more site-specific impact on surface
concentrations, with the coastal Azalea Park site having a 0.4–0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(30 %) decrease in predicted chloride and sodium concentrations
and the bayside (Gandy Bridge) and inland (Sydney) sites having only a
10–15 % decrease relative to the baseline simulation. Figure S3 shows the
model grid cells in the vicinity of Tampa Bay (including the Gandy Bridge
site) have a representation of the open-ocean fraction but not the surf-zone
fraction used for surf-enhanced SSA emissions. The predicted 50 % decrease
in the chloride and sodium surface concentrations from Azalea Park to Sydney
in the v5.0.2f simulation was more similar to the observed 30 % decrease
than the 60 % decrease predicted by the baseline simulation.</p>
      <p>In general, the best model performance at the BRACE sites occurred with SSA
emissions having a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 8, SST dependence, and a reduced surf
enhancement as implemented in the v5.0.2g and revised simulations. While both
the v5.0.2g and revised simulations severely underpredicted nitrate
concentrations (by up to 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all sites, the
chloride and sodium concentrations were consistently improved both in
magnitude and correlation compared to the baseline simulation (see Table 2).
The largest improvement occurred at the inland Sydney site, where substantial
underpredictions of chloride and sodium in the baseline simulation were
largely eliminated in the revised simulations (chloride and sodium NMBs
improved from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>37</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, respectively). Comparison of the
simulations with the third-order polynomial (v5.0.2g) and linear (revised)
SST dependence of SSA emissions revealed that the linear dependence led to
slightly improved prediction of chloride and sodium at the Azalea Park and
Sydney sites (Pearson's correlation coefficients jumped from 0.57 to 0.61 and
biases went from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.32 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for sodium in
Sydney) and similar performance at the Gandy Bridge site. Improved prediction
of chloride and sodium concentrations at these sites was not surprising as
the linear temperature dependence was adapted from a process-based
parameterization incorporating seawater viscosity and wave state (Ovadnevaite
et al., 2014) as opposed to the top-down, model-specific third-order
polynomial parameterization developed for GEOS-Chem in Jaeglé et
al. (2011).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of the observed and predicted daily PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the three BRACE sites. Note that the
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration predicted by CMAQ is represented by the
sum of the Aitken and accumulation modes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The statistical improvement in the revised simulation relative to the
baseline simulation is reflected in the time series of sodium concentrations
at the three sites (Fig. 2). Besides showing the generally higher
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sodium concentrations at the bayside and inland sites and higher
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sodium concentrations at all sites, Fig. 2 also shows that the
revised simulation diverges most from the baseline during periods of high
SSA concentration episodes (15, 22 May 2002). This suggests that the revised
simulation better replicated the sea spray aerosol emissions during periods
with strong onshore flow compared to the baseline simulation. The range of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sodium concentrations predicted by the revised simulation was
more consistent with observations than the baseline simulation, especially
at the Sydney site which has observed concentrations of 0.05–0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and predicted concentrations of 0.02–0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
0.03–0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the baseline and revised simulations. The
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sodium concentrations at the BRACE sites were lower than
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sodium measured at a nearby CSN site (located at 28.05<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
82.378056<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) averaging 0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the same period but
well correlated (correlation coefficients ranging from 0.65 to 0.90) for the
5–6 days of coincident measurements. This CSN site is part of the CONUS
model evaluation described in Sect. 3.3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Observed and predicted size distributions of Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the three
Tampa-area sites averaged over 15 sampling days (14 at Sydney) during 2 May–2 June 2002.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Comparison of the predicted and observed size distribution of sodium at the
three sites (see Fig. 3) showed that much of the observed and predicted
decrease in the sodium mass concentration in the transition from coastal to
inland sites occurred within the coarse mode. The baseline simulation
overpredicted/underpredicted coarse-mode sodium at the coastal/inland sites,
while the revised simulation well predicted the coarse-mode sodium at both
the coastal and inland sites. At the bayside Gandy Bridge site, the high SSTs
in Tampa Bay resulted in an increase in the bias from the baseline
simulation due to the revised simulation overestimating coarse-mode
observations. Both the baseline and revised simulations predict a second
submicron mode for the three sites that is not evident in the observations;
it is unclear whether this discrepancy is related to inaccuracies in the
size-resolved emissions or the modal distribution of the model.</p>
      <p>Fine-mode (Aitken <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation) sodium concentrations increased
throughout the BRACE domain in the revised simulation relative to the
baseline simulation with larger changes (up to 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
offshore and smaller changes (0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inland as shown in
the right column of Fig. 1a. The total (sum of Aitken, accumulation, and
coarse modes) sodium concentrations over the open ocean increased in the
warmer southern waters of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans and decreased in
the cooler waters off New England and the Pacific Northwest. Grid cells
directly adjacent to the coast experienced concentration decreases of up to
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the largest decreases occurring for cells
with large surf zones due to irregular coastlines (barrier islands,
peninsulas, etc.). These coastline-centered decreases were limited
spatially, as adjacent cells just offshore had large increases in sodium
concentration. Like the fine-mode changes, the largest total sodium
concentration increases occurred offshore while more modest increases were
predicted for inland locations. The coastal-inland concentration gradients
were stronger for the total concentration changes due to the faster
deposition velocity of coarse-mode aerosols (relative to the fine mode)
that comprise most of the total mass.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of observed and modeled fraction of total nitrate in
the particle phase
[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]
at the Sydney, FL, site for May 2002. Tick marks represent 00:00 local
standard time on each day.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The hourly time series of observed and predicted nitrate gas/particle
partitioning from the Sydney site for May 2002 (Fig. 4) shows that the
revised simulation pushes the partitioning towards the particle phase
(relative to the baseline simulation) and closer to observations. The
average observed fraction of nitrate in the particle phase was 0.51, while
the predicted fractions from the baseline and revised simulations were 0.36
and 0.42, respectively. Figure 4 indicates that the largest difference in
the nitrate partitioning between the baseline and revised simulations
occurred during the daytime, when higher concentrations of inorganic ions
like sodium prevented some of the nitric acid evaporation from the particle
phase during the hot afternoon period. Despite improvement in the daytime
partitioning, the revised simulation continued to overpredict the nighttime
nitrate fraction and daytime nitric acid fraction. This impact on
partitioning is consistent with Kelly et al. (2014), which suggested that
improving CMAQ prediction of sodium concentration and relative humidity
would improve gas-particle partitioning of nitrate in the CalNex model
domain.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>CalNex</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Change (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the fine-mode (Aitken <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation)
surface sodium concentration between the revised and baseline
simulations for June 2010 over the CalNex domain surrounded by time series
plots of the observed and predicted daily and/or hourly PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-sodium
concentration at the coastal CalNex sites.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Similar to results for the BRACE sites, the predicted fine-mode sodium
surface concentrations were improved in the revised simulation relative to
the baseline for sites examined during the CalNex simulation period (see
Fig. 5). Surface sodium concentrations were underpredicted by both the
baseline and revised simulations for all the coastal CalNex sites,
especially in the 11–16 June time period when high sodium concentrations at
several of the sites were not well captured by either the revised or
baseline simulation. It is worth noting that a sensitivity test in which the
surf-enhanced emissions were increased (using a surf-zone width of 100 m
rather than 25 m as in the revised simulation) did not
substantially improve the sodium underpredictions at the coastal CalNex
sites. Monthly average (June 2010) sodium concentrations predicted in the
revised simulation increased by up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
off the California coast relative to the baseline simulation, with increases
between 0.05 and 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> widespread in the San Francisco, Los
Angeles, and San Diego air basins (Fig. 5). Hourly or daily average
increases between the revised and baseline simulations were even higher in
these urban areas, with the time series plots in Fig. 5 showing increases
up to 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The spatial patterns of impacts on sodium in the
Central Valley and South Coast air basin matched those of tracers released
from San Francisco and LAX airport that are drawn inland on the sea breeze
(Baker et al., 2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Change (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the fine-mode (Aitken <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation)
surface nitrate concentration between the revised and baseline
simulations for June 2010 over the CalNex domain surrounded by time series
plots of the observed and predicted daily and/or hourly PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> nitrate
concentration at the coastal CalNex sites.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Improving the sodium underprediction at the coastal CalNex sites in the
revised simulation had the effect of improving the frequent nitrate aerosol
underprediction at the same sites (see Fig. 6). Unlike the sodium
concentration changes, the largest (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in
monthly average nitrate aerosol concentration occurred over the Los Angeles
air basin well inland from the coast. The increase of nitrate largely
occurred in inland areas where nitric acid was produced downwind of urban
centers with large NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. For conditions unfavorable for
ammonium nitrate formation (e.g., high temperature, low RH, low NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
nitrate may still form in sea spray particles through replacement reactions
(e.g., NaCl(p) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NaNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(p) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl(g)). Since such
pathways involve pollution derived from urban emissions (HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
addition to sea salt (NaCl), the highest nitrate increases occurred inland
despite the relatively small increases in sodium compared to the baseline
simulation in these areas. Similarly, polluted sites such as Pasadena and
Riverside had larger increases in nitrate concentrations than cleaner sites
in the San Francisco air basin despite having similar sodium concentration
changes. This behavior suggested that these SSA emission updates had the
largest air quality impact in coastal urban areas with mixtures of marine
and polluted air masses. Note that the nitrate-to-sodium ratio of molar
masses is about 2.7, and so a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in the moles of sodium and
nitrate according to NaNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stoichiometry would lead to a greater
increase of nitrate than sodium mass. The nitrate underpredictions in Fig. 6
were not resolved entirely by improved sodium predictions. In Riverside,
for example, nitrate underpredictions in the revised simulation were likely
due to a combination of persistent sodium underpredictions and an
underestimate of ammonia emissions from upwind dairy facilities (Nowak et
al., 2012; Kelly et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Continental US</title>
      <p>Unlike the PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-sodium concentrations evaluated using
the BRACE and CalNex observations, the total sodium surface concentration
changes shown in Fig. 1b both increased and decreased in the CONUS domain
due to the variability in coastal and oceanic SSTs. The distribution of fine-mode
(Aitken <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation) concentration changes (Fig. 1a) had some
similar features to the total concentration changes (Fig. 1b), with the
largest increases occurring over areas with high (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) SSTs. Differences between the fine mode and
total concentration changes were most notable for regions with low
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) SSTs (Pacific and northeastern US
coasts) and for inland regions. Because fine-mode particles have a low dry
deposition velocity, offshore increases in the fine-mode sodium
concentrations were able to extend inland and lead to increased deposition
(see Fig. S4a). The flat topography and large offshore concentration
increases in the southeastern US resulted in concentration increases of up to
0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> hundreds of kilometers from the coast. While
reductions in fine-mode SSA emissions due to low SSTs were balanced by
increased emissions from changing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, cold seawater temperatures off
the Pacific coast and northeastern US led to large decreases in total sodium
concentration of up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As in the BRACE domain, the
decrease in surf-enhanced emissions led to localized decreases in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
sodium concentration for grid cells immediately adjacent to the coastline
throughout the CONUS domain. Regions with rugged coastlines and barrier
islands experienced the largest concentration decreases because of the large
surf-zone area.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Model bias of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-sodium concentration predicted by the
revised simulation compared to observations from the IMPROVE (triangles) and
CSN (squares) networks for May 2002 segregated by an <bold>(a)</bold> increase or <bold>(b)</bold>
decrease in the error relative to the baseline simulation. The map only
includes data where the model percentage difference between the revised and
baseline simulations is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/8/3733/2015/gmd-8-3733-2015-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Statistical comparison of the mean and Pearson's correlation
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) between observed and model-predicted sodium, nitrate and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> surface concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the continental
US in May 2002 from the IMPROVE and CSN networks.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center">Specie </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Obs.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Baseline<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">v5.0.2g </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center">Revised<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9">IMPROVE </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col9">CSN </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> This simulation is also referred to as the CMAQv5.0.2a simulation.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> This simulation is also referred to as the CMAQv5.0.2h simulation.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>Model comparison of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-sodium concentrations from the IMPROVE and
CSN networks revealed improvement from the baseline to revised simulation
(see Fig. 7). For both the IMPROVE and CSN networks, far fewer sites had
an increased error (Fig. 7a) in the revised simulation relative to the
baseline than had reductions in the model error (Fig. 7b). Sites where the
model error increased in the revised simulation were widely scattered across
the CONUS domain and typically overpredicted concentrations. The sites where
model error was reduced in the revised simulation were in the southeastern and
mid-Atlantic US and typically underestimated concentrations. Sodium
concentrations at numerous sites were underpredicted by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the revised simulation, suggesting that the SSA
emission changes were insufficient to bring the model into agreement with
most observations. Despite cold waters off the Pacific coast leading to
lower emissions (relative to the warmer Gulf of Mexico) in the revised
simulation, there were more sites in California that had an error reduction
in the predicted concentrations than had increased model error. Cold waters
in the Gulf of Maine and the associated lower emissions/concentrations in
the revised simulation had the effect of reducing the overprediction of
sodium at several sites in coastal New England. Table 3 shows that the
average bias for sodium concentrations for all stations in the IMPROVE and
CSN networks was reduced from the baseline to revised simulation (NMB: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>63.7
to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>57.6 % and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>67.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54.9 % for the IMPROVE and CSN networks,
respectively) with small improvements in the correlation. Predicted nitrate
concentrations improved in the revised simulation relative to the baseline,
with slight reductions in the large model underpredictions for the IMPROVE
(NMB: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>62.7 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>56.8 %) and CSN (NMB: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>68.6 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65.0 %) networks.
Despite similar changes in average sodium concentrations between the
baseline and revised simulations for the IMPROVE and CSN networks, the
average change in PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two simulations was much higher for
the CSN (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than the IMPROVE (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
network. Predominantly comprised of urban sites, CSN sites
are located in more polluted regions where changes in sodium concentrations
were more likely to have an impact on the partitioning of HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl,
and NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between gas and particle phases leading to increases in nitrate
aerosol concentrations (see Fig. 6 for an example). The enhanced
partitioning of nitrate to the particle phase in the revised simulation also
led to decreased deposition of total nitrate inland because of the lower dry
deposition velocity of nitrate aerosol relative to nitric acid (see Fig. S4b).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this study, the size distribution, temperature dependence, and surf-zone
enhancement of sea spray aerosol (SSA) emissions were updated in the
Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0.2. Increasing fine-mode emissions, including temperature dependence, and reducing the
surf-enhanced emissions from the “baseline” to the “revised” simulation
collectively improved the summertime surface concentration predictions for
sodium, chloride, and nitrate at three Bay Regional Atmospheric Chemistry
Experiment (BRACE) sites near Tampa, Florida. Surface concentrations at the
inland site near Tampa were particularly affected by these emission changes,
as low dry deposition velocities for the fine-mode aerosols increased the
atmospheric lifetime and inland concentrations. The coastal–inland
concentration gradient was also affected by the updated emissions, as the
reduction in surf-zone width used to enhance surf-zone emissions brought the
revised simulation in closer agreement with observations. These SSA emission
updates led to increases in the fine-mode sodium surface concentrations
throughout coastal areas of the continental US, with the largest increases
occurring near the southeastern US coast where sea surface temperatures (SSTs)
were high. Decreases in the total sodium concentration were predicted for
oceanic regions with low SSTs such as the Pacific and northern Atlantic
coasts. Comparison of the baseline and revised simulation with sodium
observations from the IMPROVE and CSN networks showed that the updated
emissions reduced the widespread underprediction of concentrations,
especially in the southeastern and mid-Atlantic US. Non-linear responses
between changes in total and sea salt PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations indicated
that the impacts of these emissions changes on aerosol chemistry were
enhanced in polluted coastal environments. The revised simulation had
increased sodium and nitrate aerosol concentrations at most CalNex sites,
slightly reducing the underprediction from the baseline simulation.</p>
      <p>Potential future work includes treating the organic fraction of SSAs (Gantt
et al., 2010), implementing the Group for High Resolution Sea Surface
Temperature (GHRSST) data set (Donlon et al., 2007), and linking the SSA
emissions to marine boundary layer halogen chemistry via debromination (Yang
et al., 2005). Episodic high SSA concentrations are not well captured at any
of the coastal CalNex sites in the revised simulation, suggesting that other
factors not accounted for in our updated SSA emission parameterization such
as wind history, wave state, ocean biology, solar radiation, whitecap
timescales, or the limited ocean surface area in the modeling domain
(Callaghan et al., 2008, 2014; Ovadnevaite et al., 2014; Long et al., 2014) may play an important role. Additional model
developments focused on the South Coast region of California are warranted
considering the impact on nitrate discussed above as well as the impact that
reactive chlorine atoms derived from sea spray particles can have on ozone
in this region (Simon et al., 2009; Sarwar et al., 2012; Riedel et al.,
2014). As the fine-mode size distribution has a far greater impact on the
number concentration than the mass concentration, the changes described in
this study likely impact other model parameters such as aerosol radiative
feedbacks, which are included in the coupled WRF–CMAQ modeling system (Gan et
al., 2014).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Code availability</title>
      <p>The updated code is available upon request prior to the public release of
CMAQ v5.1. Please contact Jesse Bash at bash.jesse@epa.gov for more
information.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3733-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/gmd-8-3733-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to acknowledge use of Rodney Weber's continuous PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
composition measurements from the Pasadena ground site and monitor data from
the IMPROVE and CSN networks. We also thank Christopher Nolte for help in
the analysis of the BRACE data set/aerosol size distributions, Kirk Baker for
help in the development of the CalNex platform, and the two anonymous
reviewers for their constructive comments. The United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development funded
and managed the research described here. This paper has been subjected to
the Agency's administrative review and approved for publication. B. Gantt is
supported by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at the
Office of Research and Development, US EPA, administered by
ORISE.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by:  A. B. Guenther</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Andreas, L. E.: A new sea spray generation function for wind speeds up to 32 ms<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> , J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 2175–2184, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Archer-Nicholls, S., Lowe, D., Utembe, S., Allan, J., Zaveri, R. A., Fast, J.
D., Hodnebrog, Ø., Denier van der Gon, H., and McFiggans, G.: Gaseous
chemistry and aerosol mechanism developments for version 3.5.1 of the online
regional model, WRF-Chem, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2557–2579,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2557-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-2557-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Arnold, J. R., Hartsell, B. E., Luke, W. T., Ullah, S. M. R., Dasgupta, P.
K., Huey, L. G., and Tate, P.: Field test of four methods for gas-phase
ambient nitric acid, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4210–4226, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Atkeson, T., Greening, H., and Poor, N.: Bay Region Atmospheric Chemistry
Experiment (BRACE), Atmos. Environ., 41, 4163–4164, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Baker, K. R., Misenis, C., Obland, M. D., Ferrare, R. A., Scarino, A. J.,
and Kelly, J. T.: Evaluation of surface and upper air fine scale WRF
meteorological modeling of the May and June 2010 CalNex period in California,
Atmos. Environ., 80, 299–309, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.006</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bash, J. O., Cooter, E. J., Dennis, R. L., Walker, J. T., and Pleim, J. E.:
Evaluation of a regional air-quality model with bidirectional NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange
coupled to an agroecosystem model, Biogeosciences, 10, 1635–1645,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1635-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-1635-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Hakala J.,
Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Covert, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Li, S.-M.,
Hayden, K. L., Nuaaman, I., McLaren, R., Massoli, P., Canagaratna, M. R,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., and Keene, W. C.: Measurements of
ocean derived aerosol off the coast of California, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D00V15, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017588</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 community multiscale air
quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component – 1. Model description, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 4183–4201, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Blot, R., Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., Kapustin, V., Howell, S. G., Jensen, J.
B., Shank, L. M., McNaughton, C. S., and Brekhovskikh, V.: Ultrafine sea
spray aerosol over the southeastern Pacific: open-ocean contributions to
marine boundary layer CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7263–7278,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7263-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7263-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Callaghan, A. H., de Leeuw, G., Cohen, L., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Relationship
of oceanic whitecap coverage to wind speed and wind history, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L23609, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036165" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008gl036165</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Callaghan, A. H., Stokes, M. D., and Deane, G. B.: The effect of water
temperature on air entrainment, bubble plumes, and surface foam in a
laboratory breaking-wave analog, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 119, 7463–7482,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010351</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A. D., Owens, S. R., and Zhou, J. C.: An ultrafine sea-salt flux
from breaking waves: Implications for cloud condensation nuclei in the
remote marine atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06202,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006565" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006565</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Crisp, T. A., Lerner, B. M., Williams, E. J., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S.,
and Bertram, T. H.: Observations of gas phase hydrochloric acid in the
polluted marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 6897–6915,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020992</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Dasgupta, P. K., Campbell, S. W., Al-Horr, R. S., Ullah, S. M. R., Li, J.
Z., Amalfitano, C., and Poor, N. D.: Conversion of sea salt aerosol to
NaNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the production of HCl: analysis of temporal behavior of aerosol
chloride/nitrate and gaseous HCl/HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4242–4257,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>de Leeuw, G., Neele, F. P., Hill, M., Smith, M. H., and Vignati, E.:
Production of sea spray aerosol in the surf zone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 29397–29409, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>de Leeuw, G., Andreas, E. L., Anguelova, M. D., Fairall, C. W., Lewis, E.
R., O'Dowd, C., Schulz, M., and Schwartz, S. E.: Production flux of sea
spray aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 49, RG2001, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010RG000349</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Donlon, C., Robinson, I, Casey, K., Vasquez, J., Armstrong, E., Gentemann,
C., May, D., LeBorgne, P., Piolle, J., Barton, I., Beggs, H., Poulter, D. J.
S., Merchant, C. J., Bingham, A., Heinz, S., Harris, A., Wick, G., Emery, B.,
Stuart-Menteth, A., Minnett, P., Evans, B., Llewellyn-Jones, D., Mutlow, C.,
Reynolds, R., Kawamura, H., and Rayner, N.: The Global Ocean Data
Assimilation Experiment (GODAE) High Resolution Sea Surface Temperature Pilot
Project (GHRSST-PP), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc, 88, 1197–1213, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Evans, M. S. C., Campbell, S. W., Bhethanabotla, V., and Poor, N. D.: Effect
of sea salt and calcium carbonate interactions with nitric acid on the direct
dry deposition of nitrogen to Tampa Bay, Florida, Atmos. Environ., 38,
4847–4858, 2004</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient
thermodynamic equilibrium model for
K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–Ca<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–Mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Na<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Cl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Fuentes, E., Coe, H., Green, D., de Leeuw, G., and McFiggans, G.: On the
impacts of phytoplankton-derived organic matter on the properties of the
primary marine aerosol – Part 1: Source fluxes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
9295–9317, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9295-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9295-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gan, C.-M., Binkowski, F., Pleim, J., Xing, J., Wong, D., Mathur, R., and
Gilliam, R.: Assessment of the Aerosol Optics Component of the Coupled
WRF-CMAQ Model using CARES Field Campaign data and a Single Column Model,
Atmospheric Environment, Atmos. Environ., 115, 670–682,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.028</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Gantt, B., Meskhidze, N., and Carlton, A. G.: The contribution of marine
organics to the air quality of the western United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
10, 7415–7423, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7415-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7415-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gard, E. E., Kleeman, M. J., Gross, D. S., Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O.,
Morrical, B. D., Fergenson, D. P., Dienes, T., Galli, M. E., Johnson, R. J.,
Cass, G. R., and Prather, K. A.: Direct observation of heterogeneous
chemistry in the atmosphere, Science, 279, 1184–1187, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gong, S. L.: A parameterization of sea-salt aerosol source function for sub-
and super-micron particles, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1097,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003gb002079</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Grythe, H., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Quinn, P., and Stohl, A.: A review of
sea-spray aerosol source functions using a large global set of sea salt
aerosol concentration measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1277–1297,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1277-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1277-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Henderson, B. H., Akhtar, F., Pye, H. O. T., Napelenok, S. L., and Hutzell,
W. T.: A database and tool for boundary conditions for regional air quality
modeling: description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 339–360,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-339-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-339-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hopkins, R. J., Desyaterik, Y., Tivanski, A. V., Zaveri, R. A., Berkowitz,
C. M., Tyliszczak, T., Gilles, M. K., and Laskin, A.: Chemical speciation of
sulfur in marine cloud droplets and particles: Analysis of individual
particles from the marine boundary layer over the California current, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, D04209, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008954" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008954</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Im, U.: Impact of sea-salt emissions on the model performance and aerosol
chemical composition and deposition in the East Mediterranean coastal
regions, Atmos. Environ., 75, 329–340, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.034</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B., and Lin, J.-T.:
Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and
remote sensing observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3137–3157,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Keene, W. C., Maring, H., Maben, J. R., Kieber, D. J., Pszenny, A. A. P.,
Dahl, E. E., Izaguirre, M. A., Davis, A. J., Long, M. S., Zhou, X. L.,
Smoydzin, L., and Sander, R.: Chemical and physical characteristics of
nascent aerosols produced by bursting bubbles at a model air-sea interface,
J. Geophys. Res., 112, D21202, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008464" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008464</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kelly, J. T., Bhave, P. V., Nolte, C. G., Shankar, U., and Foley, K. M.:
Simulating emission and chemical evolution of coarse sea-salt particles in
the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, Geosci. Model Dev., 3,
257–273, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-257-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-257-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kelly, J. T., Baker, K. R., Nowak, J. B., Murphy, J. G., Markovic, M. Z.,
VandenBoer, T. C., Ellis, R. A., Neuman, J. A., Weber, R. J., Roberts, J. M.,
Veres, P. R., de Gouw, J. A., Beaver, M. R., Newman, S., and Misenis, C.:
Fine-scale simulation of ammonium and nitrate over the South Coast Air Basin
and San Joaquin Valley of California during CalNex-2010, J. Geophys. Res.
Atmos., 119, 3600–3614, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021290</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, E. R. and Schwartz, S. E.: Sea-Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms,
Methods, Measurements, and Models – A Critical Review, American Geophysical
Union, Washington, DC, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Long, M. S., Keene, W. C., Easter, R. C., Sander, R., Liu, X., Kerkweg, A.,
and Erickson, D.: Sensitivity of tropospheric chemical composition to
halogen-radical chemistry using a fully coupled size-resolved multiphase
chemistry–global climate system: halogen distributions, aerosol composition,
and sensitivity of climate-relevant gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
3397–3425, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3397-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3397-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Mårtensson, E. M., Nilsson, E. D., de Leeuw, G., Cohen, L. H., and
Hansson, H. C.: Laboratory simulations are parameterization of the primary
marine aerosol production, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4297,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002263" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002263</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>McInnes, L. M., Covert, D. S., Quinn, P. K., and Germani, M. S.:
Measurements of chloride depletion and sulfur enrichment in individual
sea-salt particles collected from the remote marine boundary-layer, J.
Geophys., 99, 8257–8268, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Monahan, E. C., Spiel, D. E., and Davidson, K. L.: A model of marine aerosol
generation via whitecaps and wave disruption, Oceanic Whitecaps and Their
Role in Air-Sea Exchange Processes, edited by: Monahan, E. C., G.
MacNiocaill, Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 167–174, 1986.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D., Anderson, J., Quinn, P., McInnes, L., Brechtel, F., Kreidenweis,
S., Middlebrook, A., Posfai, M., Thomson, D., and Buseck, P.: Influence of
sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in the Southern Ocean marine
boundary layer, Nature, 392, 62–65, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/32138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/32138</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Nolte, C. G., Bhave, P. V., Arnold, J. R., Dennis, R. L., Zhang, K. M., and
Wexler, A. S.: Modeling urban and regional aerosols – Application of the
CMAQ-UCD Aerosol Model to Tampa, a coastal urban site, Atmos. Environ., 42,
3179–3191, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Nolte, C. G., Appel, K. W., Kelly, J. T., Bhave, P. V., Fahey, K. M., Collett
Jr., J. L., Zhang, L., and Young, J. O.: Evaluation of the Community
Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v5.0 against size-resolved measurements
of inorganic particle composition across sites in North America, Geosci.
Model Dev., 8, 2877–2892, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2877-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-2877-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Norris, S. J., Brooks, I. M., de Leeuw, G., Smith, M. H., Moerman, M., and
Lingard, J. J. N.: Eddy covariance measurements of sea spray particles over
the Atlantic Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 555–563,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-555-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-555-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Nowak, J. B., Neuman, J., Bahreini, R., Middlebrook, A. M., Holloway, J.,
McKeen, S., Parrish, D., Ryerson, T., and Trainer, M.: Ammonia sources in
the California South Coast Air Basin and their impact on ammonium nitrate
formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L07804, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051197" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL051197</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D., Smith, M. H., Consterdine, I. E., and Lowe, J. A.: Marine
aerosol, sea-salt, and the marine sulphur cycle: A short review, Atmos.
Environ., 31, 73–80, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Ovadnevaite, J., Manders, A., de Leeuw, G., Ceburnis, D., Monahan, C.,
Partanen, A.-I., Korhonen, H., and O'Dowd, C. D.: A sea spray aerosol flux
parameterization encapsulating wave state, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
1837–1852, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1837-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1837-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Petelski, T. and Chomka, M.: Marine aerosol fluxes in the coastal zone–BAEX
experimental data, Oceanologia, 38, 469–484, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pierce, J. and Adams, P. J.: Global evaluation of CCN formation by direct
emission of sea salt and growth of ultrafine sea salt, J. Geophys. Res.,
111, D06203, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006186" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006186</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Riedel, T. P., Wolfe, G. M., Danas, K. T., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Bon,
D. M., Vlasenko, A., Li, S.-M., Williams, E. J., Lerner, B. M., Veres, P. R.,
Roberts, J. M., Holloway, J. S., Lefer, B., Brown, S. S., and Thornton, J.
A.: An MCM modeling study of nitryl chloride (ClNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) impacts on oxidation,
ozone production and nitrogen oxide partitioning in polluted continental
outflow, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3789–3800, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3789-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3789-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Ryerson, T. B., Andrews, A. E., Angevine, W. M., Bates, T. S., Brock, C. A.,
Cairns, B., Cohen, R. C., Cooper, O. R., de Gouw, J. A., Fehsenfeld, F. C.,
Ferrare, R. A., Fischer, M. L., Flagan, R. C., Goldstein, A. H., Hair, J. W.,
Hardesty, R. M., Hostetler, C. A., Jimenez, J. L., Langford, A. O., McCauley,
E., McKeen, S. A., Molina, L. T., Nenes, A., Oltmans, S. J., Parrish, D. D.,
Pederson, J. R., Pierce, R. B., Prather, K., Quinn, P. K., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Senff, C. J., Sorooshian, A., Stutz, J., Surratt, J. D., Trainer, M.,
Volkamer, R., Williams, E. J., and Wofsy, S. C.: The 2010 California Research
at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study, J.
Geophys. Res., 118, 5830–5866, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50331" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50331</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Sarwar, G., Simon, H., Bhave, P., and Yarwood, G.: Examining the impact of heterogeneous nitryl chloride production on air
quality across the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6455–6473, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6455-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6455-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Sellegri, K., O'Dowd, C. D., Yoon, Y. J., Jennings, S. G., and de Leeuw, G.:
Surfactants and submicron sea spray generation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, D22215, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006658</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Simon, H., Kimura, Y., McGaughey, G., Allen, D. T., Brown, S. S., Osthoff,
H. D., Roberts, J. M., Byun, D., and Lee, D.: Modeling the impact of
ClNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on ozone formation in the Houston area, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D00F03, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010732" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010732</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda,
M. G., Huang, X., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the Advanced
Reserch WRF version 3., NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Sofiev, M., Soares, J., Prank, M., de Leeuw, G., and Kukkonen, J.: A
regional-to-global model of emission and transport of sea salt particles in
the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D21302, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014713" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014713</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Spada, M., Jorba, O., Pérez García-Pando, C., Janjic, Z., and Baldasano,
J. M.: Modeling and evaluation of the global sea-salt aerosol distribution:
sensitivity to size-resolved and sea-surface temperature dependent emission
schemes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11735–11755, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11735-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11735-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sullivan, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: Investigations of the diurnal cycle and
mixing state of oxalic acid in individual particles in Asian aerosol outflow,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8062–8069, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Tang, I. N., Tridico, A. C., and Fung, K. H.: Thermodynamic and optical
properties of sea salt aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 23269–23275, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Tyree, C. A., Hellion, V. M., Alexandrova, O. A., and Allen, J. O.: Foam
droplets generated from natural and artificial seawaters, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D12204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007729" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007729</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Vignati, E., de Leeuw, G., and Berkowicz, R.: Modeling coastal aerosol
transport and effects of surf-produced aerosols on processes in the marine
atmospheric boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 20225–20238,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Weber, R. J., Orsini, D., Daun, Y., Lee, Y. N., Klotz, P. J., and Brechtel,
F.: A Particle-into-Liquid Collector for Rapid Measurement of Aerosol Bulk
Chemical Composition, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 35, 718–727,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820152546761" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820152546761</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>White, W. H.: Chemical markers for sea salt in IMPROVE aerosol data, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 261–274, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Cox, R., Warwick, N., Pyle, J., Carver, G., O'Connor, F., and
Savage, N.: Tropospheric bromine chemistry and its impacts on ozone: A model
study, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23311, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006244</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Zábori, J., Matisans, M., Krejci, R., Nilsson, E. D., and Ström, J.:
Artificial primary marine aerosol production: a laboratory study with varying
water temperature, salinity, and succinic acid concentration, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 10709–10724, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zábori, J., Krejci, R., Ekman, A. M. L., Mårtensson, E. M., Ström, J., de
Leeuw, G., and Nilsson, E. D.: Wintertime Arctic Ocean sea water properties
and primary marine aerosol concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
10405-10421, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K. M., Knipping, E. M., Wexler, A. S., Bhave, P. V., and Tonnesen, G.
S.: Size distribution of sea-salt emissions as a function of relative
humidity, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3373–3379, 2005.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K. M., Knipping, M. E., Wexler, A. S., Bhave, P. V., and Tonnesen, S.
G.: Reply to comment on “Size distribution of sea-salt emissions as a
function of relative humidity”, Atmos. Environ., 40, 591–592, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Updating sea spray aerosol emissions in the Community Multiscale Air
Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0.2</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><h6 xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">Abstract. </h6><p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="p">Sea spray aerosols (SSAs) impact the particle mass concentration and
gas-particle partitioning in coastal environments, with implications for
human and ecosystem health. Model evaluations of SSA emissions have mainly
focused on the global scale, but regional-scale evaluations are also
important due to the localized impact of SSAs on atmospheric chemistry near
the coast. In this study, SSA emissions in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model were updated to enhance the fine-mode size
distribution, include sea surface temperature (SST) dependency, and reduce
surf-enhanced emissions. Predictions from the updated CMAQ model and those
of the previous release version, CMAQv5.0.2, were evaluated using several
coastal and national observational data sets in the continental US. The
updated emissions generally reduced model underestimates of sodium,
chloride, and nitrate surface concentrations for coastal sites in the Bay
Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (BRACE) near Tampa, Florida.
Including SST dependency to the SSA emission parameterization led to
increased sodium concentrations in the southeastern US and decreased
concentrations along parts of the Pacific coast and northeastern US. The
influence of sodium on the gas-particle partitioning of nitrate resulted in
higher nitrate particle concentrations in many coastal urban areas due to
increased condensation of nitric acid in the updated simulations,
potentially affecting the predicted nitrogen deposition in sensitive
ecosystems. Application of the updated SSA emissions to the California
Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) study
period resulted in a modest improvement in the predicted surface concentration
of sodium and nitrate at several central and southern California coastal
sites. This update of SSA emissions enabled a more realistic simulation of
the atmospheric chemistry in coastal environments where marine air mixes
with urban pollution.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andreas, L. E.: A new sea spray generation function for wind speeds up to 32 ms<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msup level="2"><m:mi/><m:mrow><m:mo>-</m:mo><m:mn mathvariant="normal">1</m:mn></m:mrow></m:msup></m:math> , J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 2175–2184, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Archer-Nicholls, S., Lowe, D., Utembe, S., Allan, J., Zaveri, R. A., Fast, J.
D., Hodnebrog, Ø., Denier van der Gon, H., and McFiggans, G.: Gaseous
chemistry and aerosol mechanism developments for version 3.5.1 of the online
regional model, WRF-Chem, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2557–2579,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2557-2014" title="" class="ref">10.5194/gmd-7-2557-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Arnold, J. R., Hartsell, B. E., Luke, W. T., Ullah, S. M. R., Dasgupta, P.
K., Huey, L. G., and Tate, P.: Field test of four methods for gas-phase
ambient nitric acid, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4210–4226, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Atkeson, T., Greening, H., and Poor, N.: Bay Region Atmospheric Chemistry
Experiment (BRACE), Atmos. Environ., 41, 4163–4164, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Baker, K. R., Misenis, C., Obland, M. D., Ferrare, R. A., Scarino, A. J.,
and Kelly, J. T.: Evaluation of surface and upper air fine scale WRF
meteorological modeling of the May and June 2010 CalNex period in California,
Atmos. Environ., 80, 299–309, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.006" title="" class="ref">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.006</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bash, J. O., Cooter, E. J., Dennis, R. L., Walker, J. T., and Pleim, J. E.:
Evaluation of a regional air-quality model with bidirectional NH<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">3</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> exchange
coupled to an agroecosystem model, Biogeosciences, 10, 1635–1645,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1635-2013" title="" class="ref">10.5194/bg-10-1635-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Hakala J.,
Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Covert, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Li, S.-M.,
Hayden, K. L., Nuaaman, I., McLaren, R., Massoli, P., Canagaratna, M. R,
Onasch, T. B., Sueper, D., Worsnop, D. R., and Keene, W. C.: Measurements of
ocean derived aerosol off the coast of California, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D00V15, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017588" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2012JD017588</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 community multiscale air
quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component – 1. Model description, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 4183–4201, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Blot, R., Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., Kapustin, V., Howell, S. G., Jensen, J.
B., Shank, L. M., McNaughton, C. S., and Brekhovskikh, V.: Ultrafine sea
spray aerosol over the southeastern Pacific: open-ocean contributions to
marine boundary layer CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7263–7278,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7263-2013" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-13-7263-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Callaghan, A. H., de Leeuw, G., Cohen, L., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Relationship
of oceanic whitecap coverage to wind speed and wind history, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 35, L23609, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036165" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2008gl036165</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Callaghan, A. H., Stokes, M. D., and Deane, G. B.: The effect of water
temperature on air entrainment, bubble plumes, and surface foam in a
laboratory breaking-wave analog, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 119, 7463–7482,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010351" title="" class="ref">10.1002/2014JC010351</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A. D., Owens, S. R., and Zhou, J. C.: An ultrafine sea-salt flux
from breaking waves: Implications for cloud condensation nuclei in the
remote marine atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D06202,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006565" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2005JD006565</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Crisp, T. A., Lerner, B. M., Williams, E. J., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S.,
and Bertram, T. H.: Observations of gas phase hydrochloric acid in the
polluted marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 6897–6915,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020992" title="" class="ref">10.1002/2013JD020992</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Dasgupta, P. K., Campbell, S. W., Al-Horr, R. S., Ullah, S. M. R., Li, J.
Z., Amalfitano, C., and Poor, N. D.: Conversion of sea salt aerosol to
NaNO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">3</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> and the production of HCl: analysis of temporal behavior of aerosol
chloride/nitrate and gaseous HCl/HNO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">3</m:mn></m:msub></m:math>, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4242–4257,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>de Leeuw, G., Neele, F. P., Hill, M., Smith, M. H., and Vignati, E.:
Production of sea spray aerosol in the surf zone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 29397–29409, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>de Leeuw, G., Andreas, E. L., Anguelova, M. D., Fairall, C. W., Lewis, E.
R., O'Dowd, C., Schulz, M., and Schwartz, S. E.: Production flux of sea
spray aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 49, RG2001, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000349" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2010RG000349</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Donlon, C., Robinson, I, Casey, K., Vasquez, J., Armstrong, E., Gentemann,
C., May, D., LeBorgne, P., Piolle, J., Barton, I., Beggs, H., Poulter, D. J.
S., Merchant, C. J., Bingham, A., Heinz, S., Harris, A., Wick, G., Emery, B.,
Stuart-Menteth, A., Minnett, P., Evans, B., Llewellyn-Jones, D., Mutlow, C.,
Reynolds, R., Kawamura, H., and Rayner, N.: The Global Ocean Data
Assimilation Experiment (GODAE) High Resolution Sea Surface Temperature Pilot
Project (GHRSST-PP), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc, 88, 1197–1213, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Evans, M. S. C., Campbell, S. W., Bhethanabotla, V., and Poor, N. D.: Effect
of sea salt and calcium carbonate interactions with nitric acid on the direct
dry deposition of nitrogen to Tampa Bay, Florida, Atmos. Environ., 38,
4847–4858, 2004
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient
thermodynamic equilibrium model for
K<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msup level="2"><m:mi/><m:mo>+</m:mo></m:msup></m:math>–Ca<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msup level="2"><m:mi/><m:mrow><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn><m:mo>+</m:mo></m:mrow></m:msup></m:math>–Mg<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msup level="2"><m:mi/><m:mrow><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn><m:mo>+</m:mo></m:mrow></m:msup></m:math>–NH<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:mrow><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">4</m:mn></m:msub><m:msup level="2"><m:mi/><m:mo>+</m:mo></m:msup></m:mrow></m:math>–Na<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msup level="2"><m:mi/><m:mo>+</m:mo></m:msup></m:math>–SO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:mrow><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">4</m:mn></m:msub><m:msup level="2"><m:mi/><m:mrow><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn><m:mo>-</m:mo></m:mrow></m:msup></m:mrow></m:math>–NO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:mrow><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">3</m:mn></m:msub><m:msup level="2"><m:mi/><m:mo>-</m:mo></m:msup></m:mrow></m:math>–Cl<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msup level="2"><m:mi/><m:mo>-</m:mo></m:msup></m:math>–H<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math>O
aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fuentes, E., Coe, H., Green, D., de Leeuw, G., and McFiggans, G.: On the
impacts of phytoplankton-derived organic matter on the properties of the
primary marine aerosol – Part 1: Source fluxes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
9295–9317, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9295-2010" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-10-9295-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gan, C.-M., Binkowski, F., Pleim, J., Xing, J., Wong, D., Mathur, R., and
Gilliam, R.: Assessment of the Aerosol Optics Component of the Coupled
WRF-CMAQ Model using CARES Field Campaign data and a Single Column Model,
Atmospheric Environment, Atmos. Environ., 115, 670–682,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.028" title="" class="ref">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.028</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gantt, B., Meskhidze, N., and Carlton, A. G.: The contribution of marine
organics to the air quality of the western United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
10, 7415–7423, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7415-2010" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-10-7415-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gard, E. E., Kleeman, M. J., Gross, D. S., Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O.,
Morrical, B. D., Fergenson, D. P., Dienes, T., Galli, M. E., Johnson, R. J.,
Cass, G. R., and Prather, K. A.: Direct observation of heterogeneous
chemistry in the atmosphere, Science, 279, 1184–1187, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gong, S. L.: A parameterization of sea-salt aerosol source function for sub-
and super-micron particles, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1097,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002079" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2003gb002079</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Grythe, H., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Quinn, P., and Stohl, A.: A review of
sea-spray aerosol source functions using a large global set of sea salt
aerosol concentration measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1277–1297,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1277-2014" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-14-1277-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Henderson, B. H., Akhtar, F., Pye, H. O. T., Napelenok, S. L., and Hutzell,
W. T.: A database and tool for boundary conditions for regional air quality
modeling: description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 339–360,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-339-2014" title="" class="ref">10.5194/gmd-7-339-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hopkins, R. J., Desyaterik, Y., Tivanski, A. V., Zaveri, R. A., Berkowitz,
C. M., Tyliszczak, T., Gilles, M. K., and Laskin, A.: Chemical speciation of
sulfur in marine cloud droplets and particles: Analysis of individual
particles from the marine boundary layer over the California current, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, D04209, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008954" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2007JD008954</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Im, U.: Impact of sea-salt emissions on the model performance and aerosol
chemical composition and deposition in the East Mediterranean coastal
regions, Atmos. Environ., 75, 329–340, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.034" title="" class="ref">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.034</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B., and Lin, J.-T.:
Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and
remote sensing observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3137–3157,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Keene, W. C., Maring, H., Maben, J. R., Kieber, D. J., Pszenny, A. A. P.,
Dahl, E. E., Izaguirre, M. A., Davis, A. J., Long, M. S., Zhou, X. L.,
Smoydzin, L., and Sander, R.: Chemical and physical characteristics of
nascent aerosols produced by bursting bubbles at a model air-sea interface,
J. Geophys. Res., 112, D21202, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008464" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2007JD008464</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kelly, J. T., Bhave, P. V., Nolte, C. G., Shankar, U., and Foley, K. M.:
Simulating emission and chemical evolution of coarse sea-salt particles in
the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, Geosci. Model Dev., 3,
257–273, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-257-2010" title="" class="ref">10.5194/gmd-3-257-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kelly, J. T., Baker, K. R., Nowak, J. B., Murphy, J. G., Markovic, M. Z.,
VandenBoer, T. C., Ellis, R. A., Neuman, J. A., Weber, R. J., Roberts, J. M.,
Veres, P. R., de Gouw, J. A., Beaver, M. R., Newman, S., and Misenis, C.:
Fine-scale simulation of ammonium and nitrate over the South Coast Air Basin
and San Joaquin Valley of California during CalNex-2010, J. Geophys. Res.
Atmos., 119, 3600–3614, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021290" title="" class="ref">10.1002/2013JD021290</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, E. R. and Schwartz, S. E.: Sea-Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms,
Methods, Measurements, and Models – A Critical Review, American Geophysical
Union, Washington, DC, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Long, M. S., Keene, W. C., Easter, R. C., Sander, R., Liu, X., Kerkweg, A.,
and Erickson, D.: Sensitivity of tropospheric chemical composition to
halogen-radical chemistry using a fully coupled size-resolved multiphase
chemistry–global climate system: halogen distributions, aerosol composition,
and sensitivity of climate-relevant gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
3397–3425, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3397-2014" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-14-3397-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Mårtensson, E. M., Nilsson, E. D., de Leeuw, G., Cohen, L. H., and
Hansson, H. C.: Laboratory simulations are parameterization of the primary
marine aerosol production, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4297,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002263" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2002JD002263</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>McInnes, L. M., Covert, D. S., Quinn, P. K., and Germani, M. S.:
Measurements of chloride depletion and sulfur enrichment in individual
sea-salt particles collected from the remote marine boundary-layer, J.
Geophys., 99, 8257–8268, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Monahan, E. C., Spiel, D. E., and Davidson, K. L.: A model of marine aerosol
generation via whitecaps and wave disruption, Oceanic Whitecaps and Their
Role in Air-Sea Exchange Processes, edited by: Monahan, E. C., G.
MacNiocaill, Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 167–174, 1986.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D., Anderson, J., Quinn, P., McInnes, L., Brechtel, F., Kreidenweis,
S., Middlebrook, A., Posfai, M., Thomson, D., and Buseck, P.: Influence of
sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in the Southern Ocean marine
boundary layer, Nature, 392, 62–65, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/32138" title="" class="ref">10.1038/32138</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Nolte, C. G., Bhave, P. V., Arnold, J. R., Dennis, R. L., Zhang, K. M., and
Wexler, A. S.: Modeling urban and regional aerosols – Application of the
CMAQ-UCD Aerosol Model to Tampa, a coastal urban site, Atmos. Environ., 42,
3179–3191, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Nolte, C. G., Appel, K. W., Kelly, J. T., Bhave, P. V., Fahey, K. M., Collett
Jr., J. L., Zhang, L., and Young, J. O.: Evaluation of the Community
Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v5.0 against size-resolved measurements
of inorganic particle composition across sites in North America, Geosci.
Model Dev., 8, 2877–2892, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2877-2015" title="" class="ref">10.5194/gmd-8-2877-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Norris, S. J., Brooks, I. M., de Leeuw, G., Smith, M. H., Moerman, M., and
Lingard, J. J. N.: Eddy covariance measurements of sea spray particles over
the Atlantic Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 555–563,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-555-2008" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-8-555-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Nowak, J. B., Neuman, J., Bahreini, R., Middlebrook, A. M., Holloway, J.,
McKeen, S., Parrish, D., Ryerson, T., and Trainer, M.: Ammonia sources in
the California South Coast Air Basin and their impact on ammonium nitrate
formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L07804, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051197" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2012GL051197</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D., Smith, M. H., Consterdine, I. E., and Lowe, J. A.: Marine
aerosol, sea-salt, and the marine sulphur cycle: A short review, Atmos.
Environ., 31, 73–80, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Ovadnevaite, J., Manders, A., de Leeuw, G., Ceburnis, D., Monahan, C.,
Partanen, A.-I., Korhonen, H., and O'Dowd, C. D.: A sea spray aerosol flux
parameterization encapsulating wave state, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
1837–1852, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1837-2014" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-14-1837-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Petelski, T. and Chomka, M.: Marine aerosol fluxes in the coastal zone–BAEX
experimental data, Oceanologia, 38, 469–484, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pierce, J. and Adams, P. J.: Global evaluation of CCN formation by direct
emission of sea salt and growth of ultrafine sea salt, J. Geophys. Res.,
111, D06203, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006186" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2005JD006186</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Riedel, T. P., Wolfe, G. M., Danas, K. T., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Bon,
D. M., Vlasenko, A., Li, S.-M., Williams, E. J., Lerner, B. M., Veres, P. R.,
Roberts, J. M., Holloway, J. S., Lefer, B., Brown, S. S., and Thornton, J.
A.: An MCM modeling study of nitryl chloride (ClNO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math>) impacts on oxidation,
ozone production and nitrogen oxide partitioning in polluted continental
outflow, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3789–3800, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3789-2014" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-14-3789-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Ryerson, T. B., Andrews, A. E., Angevine, W. M., Bates, T. S., Brock, C. A.,
Cairns, B., Cohen, R. C., Cooper, O. R., de Gouw, J. A., Fehsenfeld, F. C.,
Ferrare, R. A., Fischer, M. L., Flagan, R. C., Goldstein, A. H., Hair, J. W.,
Hardesty, R. M., Hostetler, C. A., Jimenez, J. L., Langford, A. O., McCauley,
E., McKeen, S. A., Molina, L. T., Nenes, A., Oltmans, S. J., Parrish, D. D.,
Pederson, J. R., Pierce, R. B., Prather, K., Quinn, P. K., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Senff, C. J., Sorooshian, A., Stutz, J., Surratt, J. D., Trainer, M.,
Volkamer, R., Williams, E. J., and Wofsy, S. C.: The 2010 California Research
at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study, J.
Geophys. Res., 118, 5830–5866, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50331" title="" class="ref">10.1002/jgrd.50331</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Sarwar, G., Simon, H., Bhave, P., and Yarwood, G.: Examining the impact of heterogeneous nitryl chloride production on air
quality across the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6455–6473, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6455-2012" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-12-6455-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Sellegri, K., O'Dowd, C. D., Yoon, Y. J., Jennings, S. G., and de Leeuw, G.:
Surfactants and submicron sea spray generation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, D22215, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006658" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2005JD006658</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Simon, H., Kimura, Y., McGaughey, G., Allen, D. T., Brown, S. S., Osthoff,
H. D., Roberts, J. M., Byun, D., and Lee, D.: Modeling the impact of
ClNO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> on ozone formation in the Houston area, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D00F03, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010732" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2008JD010732</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda,
M. G., Huang, X., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the Advanced
Reserch WRF version 3., NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Sofiev, M., Soares, J., Prank, M., de Leeuw, G., and Kukkonen, J.: A
regional-to-global model of emission and transport of sea salt particles in
the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D21302, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014713" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2010JD014713</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Spada, M., Jorba, O., Pérez García-Pando, C., Janjic, Z., and Baldasano,
J. M.: Modeling and evaluation of the global sea-salt aerosol distribution:
sensitivity to size-resolved and sea-surface temperature dependent emission
schemes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11735–11755, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11735-2013" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-13-11735-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sullivan, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: Investigations of the diurnal cycle and
mixing state of oxalic acid in individual particles in Asian aerosol outflow,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8062–8069, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Tang, I. N., Tridico, A. C., and Fung, K. H.: Thermodynamic and optical
properties of sea salt aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 23269–23275, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Tyree, C. A., Hellion, V. M., Alexandrova, O. A., and Allen, J. O.: Foam
droplets generated from natural and artificial seawaters, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D12204, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007729" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2006JD007729</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Vignati, E., de Leeuw, G., and Berkowicz, R.: Modeling coastal aerosol
transport and effects of surf-produced aerosols on processes in the marine
atmospheric boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 20225–20238,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Weber, R. J., Orsini, D., Daun, Y., Lee, Y. N., Klotz, P. J., and Brechtel,
F.: A Particle-into-Liquid Collector for Rapid Measurement of Aerosol Bulk
Chemical Composition, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 35, 718–727,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820152546761" title="" class="ref">10.1080/02786820152546761</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>White, W. H.: Chemical markers for sea salt in IMPROVE aerosol data, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 261–274, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Cox, R., Warwick, N., Pyle, J., Carver, G., O'Connor, F., and
Savage, N.: Tropospheric bromine chemistry and its impacts on ozone: A model
study, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23311, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006244" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2005JD006244</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Zábori, J., Matisans, M., Krejci, R., Nilsson, E. D., and Ström, J.:
Artificial primary marine aerosol production: a laboratory study with varying
water temperature, salinity, and succinic acid concentration, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 12, 10709–10724, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Zábori, J., Krejci, R., Ekman, A. M. L., Mårtensson, E. M., Ström, J., de
Leeuw, G., and Nilsson, E. D.: Wintertime Arctic Ocean sea water properties
and primary marine aerosol concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
10405-10421, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012" title="" class="ref">10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K. M., Knipping, E. M., Wexler, A. S., Bhave, P. V., and Tonnesen, G.
S.: Size distribution of sea-salt emissions as a function of relative
humidity, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3373–3379, 2005.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K. M., Knipping, M. E., Wexler, A. S., Bhave, P. V., and Tonnesen, S.
G.: Reply to comment on “Size distribution of sea-salt emissions as a
function of relative humidity”, Atmos. Environ., 40, 591–592, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
