<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">gmd</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn>1991-9603</issn><issn pub-type="discussion">1991-962X </issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH (Copernicus Publications)</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-8-3247-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>A semi-Lagrangian advection scheme for radioactive tracers in the
NCEP Regional Spectral Model (RSM)</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{A semi-Lagrangian advection scheme for radioactive tracers}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{E.-C.~Chang and K.~Yoshimura}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>E.-C.</given-names></name>
          <email>echang@kongju.ac.kr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Yoshimura</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Science, Kongju National
University, Gongju, South Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of
Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">E.-C. Chang (echang@kongju.ac.kr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>3247</fpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2015 E.-C. Chang</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e93">In this study, the non-iteration dimensional-split semi-Lagrangian (NDSL)
advection scheme is applied to the National Centers for Environmental
Prediction (NCEP) Regional Spectral Model (RSM) to alleviate the Gibbs
phenomenon. The Gibbs phenomenon is a problem wherein negative values of
positive-definite quantities (e.g., moisture and tracers) are generated by
the spectral space transformation in a spectral model system. To solve this
problem, the spectral prognostic specific humidity and radioactive tracer
advection scheme is replaced by the NDSL advection scheme, which considers
advection of tracers in a grid system without spectral space
transformations. A regional version of the NDSL is developed in this study
and is applied to the RSM. Idealized experiments show that the regional
version of the NDSL is successful. The model runs for an actual case study
suggest that the NDSL can successfully advect radioactive tracers
(iodine-131 and cesium-137) without noise from the Gibbs phenomenon. The
NDSL can also remove negative specific humidity values produced in spectral
calculations without losing detailed features.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e103">The spectral method is a numerical method applied to primitive
meteorological equations to achieve high-order accuracy (Robert, 1966). The
spectral method has advantages over the finite difference method: the
absence of truncation error in linear terms, the absence of aliasing and
phase errors, the absence of pole problems in global models, and the
efficient use and simple programming of semi-implicit time integration
(Bourke, 1972). Applying the spectral method in a regional model can be
difficult due to time-dependent lateral boundary conditions. However,
several approaches for solving this problem have been successful (e.g.,
Tatsumi, 1986; Fulton and Schubert, 1987; Hoyer, 1987; Segami et al., 1989;
Chen and Kuo, 1992). Juang and Kanamitsu (1994) presented the National
Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Regional Spectral Model (RSM).
The RSM has advantages in accuracy for a regional high-resolution domain. In
addition, the spectral representation of the RSM is a two-dimensional
perturbation method, which can eliminate the error due to reevaluation of
the linear forcing from the base fields by the regional model (Juang et al.,
1997). This is one of the reasons that the RSM can be easily used for
long-range climate simulations. The RSM has been widely used for regional
downscaling research (e.g., Kang and Hong, 2008; Kanamitsu et al., 2010;
Chang and Hong, 2011; Li et al., 2012). Kang and Hong (2008) assessed impact
of the land surface parameters on the regional climate circulations.
Kanamitsu et al. (2010) presented a refined spectral nudging technique for
regional dynamical downscaling. Chang and Hong (2011) used the RSM to
produce regional future scenarios by dynamical downscaling. Li et al. (2012)
showed that the fully coupled RSM and regional ocean modeling system (ROMS)
can produce detailed oceanic circulations over the California coast.</p>
      <p id="d1e106">Although the RSM has advantages, it also has a problem common in spectral
model systems: the Gibbs phenomenon. This phenomenon is “overshooting” in
the convergence of the partial sums of particular Fourier series in the
neighborhood of a discontinuity of the function being expanded. In the case
of spectral techniques, the Gibbs phenomenon can introduce negative values
in positive-definite variables (i.e., hydrometeors and tracers). Yoshimura (2011)
presented a tracer simulation for the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear
power plant accident during the massive earthquakes and tsunami on 11 March 2011 in eastern Japan by utilizing the stable isotope mode of the RSM
(IsoRSM; Yoshimura et al., 2010). General features  are well captured in this simulation, e.g., the tracers from
Fukushima reached the metropolitan area and a significant amount  of tracers
that were precipitated. However, these
simulations also clearly show that computational noise is produced by the
Gibbs phenomenon near the emission point. This problem is quite severe in
this simulation because radioactive materials are emitted from a single
grid-point source at the surface level, which creates a significant
discontinuity in the wave space transformation. Thus, an advection method
that does not require a spectral transformation for tracers is needed to
resolve the Gibbs phenomenon.</p>
      <p id="d1e109">The semi-Lagrangian method is an alternative advection scheme that can
replace the spectral calculation of hydrometeors and tracers.
Semi-Lagrangian advection schemes have long been preferred in numerical
weather prediction because they are more accurate and efficient than
traditional Eulerian schemes when large time steps are considered
(Williamson, 2007). Staniforth and Côté (1991) reviewed
the semi-Lagrangian literature  for atmospheric models. They concluded that the
semi-Lagrangian framework facilitates the incorporation of shape-preserving
and monotonic schemes for moisture advection, because of the relatively
small dispersion errors in the presence of discontinuities or near
discontinuities. Juang (2007, 2008) proposed a non-iteration
dimensional-split semi-Lagrangian (NDSL) scheme, which is simple and
economical compared with the conventional semi-Lagrangian method. Although
the NDSL scheme has not yet been applied to the regional spectral model,
some versions of the NDSL have been added to the global spectral model
system, e.g., the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS; Moorthi et al., 2001) and the
Global/Regional Integrated Model system (GRIMs; Hong et al., 2013) Global
Model Program (GMP). For a regional model system, the flux through the
boundaries is needed to apply the mass restoration, whereas there are no
boundaries for global domains. Aranami et al. (2015) applied a mass
restoration scheme for limited-area models (LAMs) with semi-Lagrangian
advection. As such, the boundary treatment is required to apply the NDSL
advection scheme for the RSM.</p>
      <p id="d1e112">The objective of this study is to remove the Gibbs phenomenon for
hydrometeors and tracers in the regional spectral model by replacing the
spectral tracer advection scheme with the semi-Lagrangian advection scheme
in a real simulation. Detailed features of the semi-Lagrangian version of
the regional spectral model and the experimental design are described in
Sect. 2. Section 3 provides results from the original IsoRSM and the
semi-Lagrangian version of IsoRSM for radioactive tracers and humidity
fields in the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident case study. A summary
and conclusion are provided in Sect. 4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Regional spectral model for radioactive tracers</title>
      <p id="d1e126">Yoshimura et al. (2010) presented the IsoRSM, which includes the isotopic
species for water vapor (HDO and H<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}_{{2}}{}^{{18}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O) as tracers in the latest
version of the Scripps Experimental Climate Prediction Center's regional
spectral model (Kanamitsu et al., 2005). In the IsoRSM, the tracers can be
incorporated into raindrops or cloud particles at every integration time
step. Therefore, the interactions between the tracers and precipitation
processes can be considered. In contrast, a general chemical transport model
uses precipitation as an external forcing. Yoshimura (2011) and Saya et al. (2013) modified IsoRSM to enable the simulation of the transport of
radioactive tracers. Isotopic variables were replaced with radioactive
tracers (i.e., <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{131}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">131</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>I and <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{137}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs), and dry and wet deposition
processes caused by gravity and precipitation processes, respectively, were
introduced. Saya et al. (2013) proposed a wet deposition process wherein the
deposition is proportional to the ratio of the amount of condensed water to
the total amount of water, whereas a traditional method (e.g., Maryon et al.,
1991)
considers only the amount of condensed water. In this study, the radioactive
tracer mode of IsoRSM is used as an original framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>NDSL scheme for RSM</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e167">Schematic of two-dimensional advection for <bold>(a)</bold> the traditional
backward semi-Lagrangian scheme and <bold>(b)</bold> the NDSL scheme. “D,” “M,” and
“A” indicate the departure point, midpoint, and arrival point,
respectively. The bold arrow indicates the wind vector at the midpoint.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="gmd-2015-70-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e182">In this study, the NDSL advection scheme replaces the spectral prognostic
calculation of the tracers in the RSM. Once each tracer field is provided
from the initial field on the regular grid space, the advection of these
fields is calculated by the NDSL on the grid space without any spectral
transformation during the model integration. This process prevents the Gibbs
phenomenon. The NDSL has two characteristics: (1) non-iteration to compute
the trajectories of each tracer  and (2) a dimensional-splitting method.
Figure 1 shows the basic concept of two-dimensional advection for both the
traditional semi-Lagrangian scheme and the NDSL scheme (from Juang, 2008).
The traditional backward (forward) semi-Lagrangian scheme assumes that the
arrival (departure) points are located on the regular model grid (Fig. 1a).
In this case, an initial guess and iterations to compute the trajectories
are required, which means finding a midpoint wind and transferring the fluid
particles from the departure points to the arrival points. These iterations
make the semi-Lagrangian scheme expensive and inefficient. The NDSL scheme
is a central scheme, which assumes a midpoint wind at the regular model
grid point at time <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>t</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to find the departure point at time <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>t-\Delta t</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the arrival point at time <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>t+\Delta t</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1b, also see Fig. 1 of Zhang
and Juang, 2012). No initial guess or iteration is needed to find
trajectories. Only one interpolation at the departure point and one
remapping at the arrival point are needed. The wind in the central scheme
can reduce numerical error better than the upstream scheme because no
estimation or iteration occurs. During the advection process, the quantity
of the tracer is assumed to be steady. The NDSL uses the
dimensional-splitting method for 2-D advection, which simply splits the 2-D
advection into a sequence of 1-D advections. Because it only needs 1-D
interpolation and remapping, the method easily attains mass conservation.
Another important advantage is that the 1-D method can be easily coded; thus,
it is compatible with most numerical models.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e222"><bold>(a)</bold> The structure of the lower-left corner in the regional domain
for boundary treatment. <bold>(b)</bold> Weighting function of the global base field
(black) and regional model field (gray) along the <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>x</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, which includes the
inner domain. This example assumes that the grid size of the boundary and
buffer zones is 3.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="gmd-2015-70-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e244">For the implementation of the regional version of the NDSL in a real-data
case, the boundary treatment must be considered. The global NDSL uses a
cyclic boundary condition, which places a duplicated global domain at the
western and eastern boundaries. This allows for the arrival or departure
point to be located, even when it lies outside of the model domain. However,
cyclic boundary conditions are not suitable for regional domains because the
domain edge points differ in both longitude and latitude. Thus, the domain
is treated as three sections: the boundary zone, the buffer zone, and inner
domains. Figure 2 shows the structure of these sections in the lower-left
corner of the model domain as an example; it assumes that the boundary and
buffer zones are defined as three grid points each. The boundary zone (dark
gray in Fig. 2a) is the area where the semi-Lagrangian advection calculation
is not applied and where the values of the global base field are specified.
This area is necessary to prevent the calculated departure point of tracers
located outside of the model domain. The values in the inner domain are
calculated entirely from the regional model. In the buffer zone (light gray
in Fig. 2a), the global base field and the regional model field are
combined, with the weighting determined by an inverse exponential function
(Eq. 1, Fig. 2b), to smooth the gap between the boundary zone and the
inner domain.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><alternatives><textual-form>\begin{array}[]{l}W_{\mathrm{G}}=\frac{1}{e^{{k}}}\\
W_{\mathrm{R}}=1-W_{\mathrm{G}}\\
\end{array}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M8" display="block"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Here, <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>W_{\mathrm{G}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the weighting for the global base field, <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>W_{\mathrm{R}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
weighting for the regional model field, and <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>k</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the grid point of the buffer
zone toward the inner domain. <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>W_{\mathrm{G}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined according to Eq. (1) in the
buffer zone but is specified as 1 and 0 in the boundary zone and the inner
domain, respectively. Finally, the result over the model domain is defined
by Eq. (2):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><alternatives><textual-form>F=W_{\mathrm{G}}F_{\mathrm{G}}+W_{\mathrm{R}}F_{\mathrm{R}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M13" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>F</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the final result of a particular tracer, <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>F_{\mathrm{G}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the global
base field, and <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>F_{\mathrm{R}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the field calculated by the regional model.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Idealized experiment</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e403">Result from the idealized horizontal advection experiment. <bold>(a)</bold>
Virtual concentration every 1000 time steps by the NDSL advection scheme and
<bold>(b)</bold> results at the 3000th time step from the NDSL (red contour) and the
analytic solution (black contour). The shaded values indicate the
differences between the NDSL results and the analytic solution.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="gmd-2015-70-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e418">An idealized experiment is performed to examine the feasibility of the
regional version of the NDSL advection scheme. A horizontal advection scheme
is examined in the 2-D domain, which has 400 east–west grid points and 400
north–south grid points, with a 10 km resolution. A uniform wind field of
10 m s<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{-1}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in both the <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>x</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>y</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> directions is used for horizontal advection.
The integration time interval (<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>\Delta t)</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to 10 s. Figure 3a
shows the result of this horizontal advection every 1000 time steps. An
ideal perturbation is imposed at the initial step, and the shape of the
perturbation is maintained during the integration up to the 3000th time
step. The transported disturbance by the NDSL scheme at the 3000th time step
is compared to the analytic solution (Fig. 3b); these two results are nearly
identical. The shaded values in Fig. 3b indicate differences between the
analytic solution and the result calculated from the NDSL. The differences
are less than 1 % of the maximum disturbance. The ratio of the mass change
due to the NDSL to the initial mass (Eq. 3) is verified to confirm that the
NDSL satisfies mass conservation.
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><alternatives><textual-form>R_{\text{mass}}=\frac{(\text{total mass})-(\text{initial total mass})}{(\text{initial total mass})}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M21" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mass</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>total mass</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>initial total mass</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>initial total mass</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>R_{\text{mass}}\approx 10^{{-15}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mass</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to the 3000th time step, which shows that the
NDSL scheme satisfies mass conservation during the integration.</p>
      <p id="d1e518">The idealized vertical advection experiment is performed in one dimension.
The vertical dimension is the sigma coordinate, which has 100 layers from 1
(bottom) to 0 (top) with equal spacing (0.01). A uniform vertical velocity
of 10<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{-4}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sigma s<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{-1}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is prescribed. The integration time interval
(<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>\Delta t)</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 100 s. Figure 4 shows that the virtual concentration
at the initial time is conserved during the transport process. The mass
conservation ratio for vertical advection is <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>R_{\text{mass}}\approx 10^{{-15}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mass</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e581">Virtual concentration from the idealized vertical advection
experiment. The red and black lines indicate the transported concentration
by the NDSL and the analytic solution, respectively.
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="gmd-2015-70-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e590">The idealized experiments in the horizontal and vertical directions verify
that the regional version of the NDSL scheme can accurately calculate the
advection of these specific perturbations in the horizontal and vertical
directions while conserving mass.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Real-case experiments</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Experiment design</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e606">Experimental domain for the case study. The shaded values indicate
orography (m). The red circle is the emission point, which is the location
of the nuclear power plant in Fukushima.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="gmd-2015-70-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e615">For the Fukushima case study, two experiments are performed. The first is
the ORG run, which is identical to the control experiment of Saya et al. (2013), wherein tracer fields are calculated in the spectral space, as is
performed in the original IsoRSM. The second is the SL run, wherein the
specific humidity and radioactive material (<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{131}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">131</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>I and <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{137}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs)
tracer fields are calculated by the NDSL scheme. All configurations except
the advection method for tracers are identical in the two experiments.
Figure 5 shows the experimental domain for the case study, with horizontal
grid spacing of 10 km. The number of grid points is 161 (east–west) by 200
(north–south). The number of vertical layers is 28 in terrain-following
sigma coordinates; the lowest and highest sigma levels are 0.995 and 0.002,
respectively. The red circle in Fig. 5 indicates the emission point, which
is the location of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. The physical
processes used are the relaxed Arakawa–Schubert deep convection scheme
(Moorthi and Suarez, 1992), the Noah land surface model (Ek et al., 2003),
the Chou radiation scheme (Chou and Suarez, 1994), and a non-local planetary
boundary scheme (Hong and Pan, 1996). The model simulation is integrated
from 00:00 UTC  12 March 2011 to 00:00 UTC  28 March 2011 (16 days). Atmospheric
initial and lateral boundary conditions are provided by the NCEP-Department
of Energy (DOE) reanalysis (Kanamitsu et al., 2002). In the case that
negative values are introduced in the initial field, correction is performed
in regional interpolation process by replacing negative values with zero. If
negative tracer quantities are produced by the physical parameterizations,
those negative values are transported to the layer above and the original values are
replaced by zero. The emission rate of the radioactive tracers from Chino et
al. (2011) is used in this study. To determine the size of the boundary and
buffer zones (Fig. 2) for this case study, the fastest wave is assumed to be
a sound wave, which moves at a speed of 300 m s<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{-1}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The estimated
longest traveling distance of this wave in one time step (<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>\Delta t=40</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s) is 12 km; this value is less than 2<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>\Delta x</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the
fastest-moving tracer is confined within 2 grid points over one time step.
Thus, it is impossible for tracers to enter from outside the domain when the
boundary zone is larger than 2<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>\Delta x</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this study, the boundary zone
is set to 5<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>\Delta x</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for safety. The buffer zone is the same size as the
boundary zone.</p>
      <p id="d1e693">When the NDSL advection is used (the SL experiment), the extra
computation cost is 35 % higher with respect to the ORG run. However, the current
version of the NDSL in the RSM still calculates spectral tracer advections
even though the result is not used any more. It means that the computational burden
with the current NDSL in the IsoRSM is purely the increased computational
cost which is required for the NDSL tracer advections. In an updated release,
this inefficiency will be solved.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Radioactive tracer field</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e704">Simulated column-integrated atmospheric radioactive tracer
(cesium-137, kBq m<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{-2}})</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 12:00 UTC, 15 March 2011.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="gmd-2015-70-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e728">Figure 6 shows column-integrated atmospheric radioactive tracer (<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{137}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs) from the ORG and the SL experiments at 12:00 UTC, 15 March 2011,
when the maximum emission rates occurred. The ORG run produces a very distinct
noise in the zonal and meridional directions from the emission point (Fig. 6a). Additionally, a ring-shaped signal surrounds the emission point. This
signal is the pattern of high-concentration, empty values; the ring shape
extends from the center of the emission to outside the domain. These
signals, also known as the ringing artifact, are typical of the Gibbs
phenomenon. In the Fukushima case study, the discontinuity of the tracer
field is pronounced because the tracers are emitted from a single grid
point, which leads to significant noise from the spectral transformation
processes in the ORG experiment. Widespread distributions of tracers with
small concentrations occur over the domain. However, the SL experiment does
not have any noise from the Gibbs phenomenon (Fig. 6b). Compared with the
ORG run, the SL experiment produces a generally similar pattern of tracers,
which advect northeast from the emission point. This result is the clearest
advantage of the semi-Lagrangian advection scheme for tracer transport in
the spectral model system. The simulated <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{131}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">131</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>I tracers have almost
the same patterns with the <inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{137}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in both the ORG and the SL runs (figure
not shown). Figure 7 shows longitudinal–vertical cross sections of tracers
averaged in the meridional direction over 36.5–37.5<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{\circ}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N, which includes the emission point. This figure shows that the ringing
noises extend above the surface in the ORG experiment (Fig. 7a). The SL
experiment shows transport in the vertical and horizontal directions without
computational noise. Clearly, the semi-Lagrangian advection method can
calculate the transport of tracers without computational noise, whereas the
spectral representation of advection produces severe errors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e769">Simulated mixing ratio of radioactive tracers (cesium-137, Bq kg<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{-1}})</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over 36.5–37.5<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{\circ}}</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N at 12:00 UTC, 15 March 2011.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="gmd-2015-70-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Humidity field</title>
      <p id="d1e808">The SL experiment applies the semi-Lagrangian method to radioactive tracers
and the humidity field. The humidity field is also a positive-definite field
and spectrally exhibits the Gibbs phenomenon, although the discontinuity is
not as strong as it is in the radioactive tracer fields. Figure 8 shows that
the specific humidity in the ORG run exhibits some negative values in the
lower troposphere (Fig. 8a, b). The SL experiment simulates detailed
humidity distributions that are similar to those of the ORG experiment but
without any negative values (Fig. 8c, d). Negatives in the ORG run
indicate that the original RSM has a systematic problem representing the
positive-definite field, even though the RSM is widely used and evaluated
for regional downscaling. The 16-day  accumulated precipitation fields from
each experiment are quite similar (Fig. 9a, b). General rainfall
patterns observed in the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)
Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) are well captured in both
experiments (Fig. 9c). The spatial correlation coefficient of precipitation
between the ORG run and the TMPA is 0.616, whereas the correlation
coefficient between the SL run and the TMPA is 0.622. It means that the
corrected humidity field by the NDSL scheme can slightly improve
precipitation or keep the simulation skill of the original IsoRSM in the
rainfall simulation. When we consider that the ORG experimental set has
been widely used for various downscaling research, it is possible to
understand that the regional NDSL can successfully calculate the transport
and distribution of humidity in the RSM. One possible reason for why the
improvement of the rainfall simulation by the NDSL scheme is not very
significant is that the selected case in this study is not a heavy rainfall
case. For a heavy rainfall case, the large discontinuity of a humidity field
is expected, which means higher possibility of negative value occurrences in
the original IsoRSM. Further studies will  continue to examine how the NDSL
can improve skills for the precipitation simulation in a heavy rainfall
cases.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e813">Specific humidity (g kg<inline-formula><alternatives><textual-form>{}^{{-1}})</textual-form></alternatives><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 850 hPa from the <bold>(a, b)</bold> ORG and
<bold>(c, d)</bold> SL runs at 00:00 and 12:00 UTC, 14 March 2011, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="gmd-2015-70-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e845">Average precipitation over the total integration period (16 days)
from the <bold>(a)</bold> ORG run, <bold>(b)</bold> SL run, and <bold>(c)</bold> TMPA.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="gmd-2015-70-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e871">In previous studies, the RSM was   utilized to simulate the Fukushima
Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. The results exhibit severe noise in
the simulated radioactive tracer fields (i.e., iodine-131 and cesium-137).
This noise is due to the Gibbs phenomenon, wherein discontinuities in
positive-definite fields create negative values after spectral
transformations. This problem is common in spectral model systems. The
spectral tracer advection is replaced with a semi-Lagrangian advection
scheme to prevent the Gibbs phenomenon in the tracer output. Prognostic
tracer fields are <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>calculated<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> using the semi-Lagrangian method and are only
considered in grid space. The Gibbs phenomenon does not occur when the
spectral space transformation is not performed.</p>
      <p id="d1e878">The semi-Lagrangian method used in this study is the NDSL scheme, which has
the advantages of efficiency and simplicity. Because the NDSL has been
previously applied in a global model system only, a regional version of the
NDSL is developed in this study. For this application, the boundary
conditions are applied by defining simple weighting functions. The regional
version of the NDSL scheme is verified by performing idealized experiments
using horizontal and vertical advection. These idealized experiments
transport a particular disturbance to the uniform wind field. The results
show that the shape is well maintained and the mass conservation is
satisfied during advection. Therefore, the regional version of the NDSL is
successfully applied in the RSM.</p>
      <p id="d1e881">Two experiments are performed for the Fukushima case study to evaluate the
NDSL advection scheme in the RSM. The ORG experiment is performed by the
original RSM, and the SL experiment is produced by the NDSL version of the
RSM. The ORG run shows severe errors in tracer fields induced by the Gibbs
phenomenon. Errors appear as a ringing signal that extends zonally and
meridionally from the emission point. Additionally, relatively strong
ring-shaped noise is captured around the emission point. This noise is
clearly removed when the tracer advection component is replaced by the NDSL
scheme. The SL run shows that the NDSL advection scheme can capture the
major transport of tracers without any noise from the Gibbs phenomenon. This
finding is the clearest advantage of the NDSL scheme in the tracer field
simulation. In the humidity field, the ORG experiment produces some negative
values in the lower troposphere. However, the SL experiment does not exhibit
such negatives; both SL and ORG capture the detailed distribution of the
humidity field. The precipitation fields from the ORG and SL experiments are
similar, which means that the NDSL properly calculates the humidity field.</p>
      <p id="d1e884">This study reveals that replacing the tracer advection scheme with a
semi-Lagrangian scheme can eliminate the Gibbs phenomenon in a regional
spectral model. However, the simulated surface depositions of radioactive
tracers   still deviate from the observations, and precipitation from the SL
experiment does not show significant improvement, even though the NDSL
removes severe errors. Note that the objective of this study is to determine
the feasibility of the NDSL advection scheme in a regional spectral model.
Thus, some quantitative validations from experiments are not included in
this study. These results may be improved upon by applying enhanced physical
parameterizations and advanced formulas for tracer surface deposition
processes.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Code availability</title>
      <p id="d1e893">One can access   the IsoRSM code through the Concurrent Versions System
(CVS) server at the Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies (COAPS).
Detailed descriptions on how to get the code and install the model can be found
in the G-RSM home page (<uri>http://g-rsm.wikispaces.com/Installation</uri>). For further information or
requests on the model, please contact   E.-C. Chang (echang@kongju.ac.kr) or K. Yoshimura (kei@aori.u-tokyo.ac.jp).</p><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-2mm}}?>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e905">This article includes studies conducted under the CREST program of JST
(Japan Science and Technology Agency), the SOUSEI program of MEXT (the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan),
and JSPS (the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) grants 23226012
and 26289160. This work was also supported by the Supercomputing
Center/Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information with
supercomputing resources including technical support
(KSC-2014-C1-041).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by:  A. Stenke</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aranami, K., Davies, T., and Wood, N.: A mass restoration scheme for
limited-area models with semi-Lagrangian advection, Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc.,
141, 1795–1803, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bourke, W.: An Efficient, One-Level, Primitive-Equation Spectral Model, Mon.
Weather Rev., 100, 683–689, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Chang, E.-C. and Hong, S.-Y.: Projected climate change scenario over East
Asia by a regional spectral model, J. Korean Earth Sci. Soc., 32, 770–783,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q.-S. and Kuo, Y.-H.: A harmonic-sine series expansion and its
application for partitioning and reconstruction problems in a limited area,
Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 91–112, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chino, M., Nakayama. H., Nagai. H., Terada. H., Katata. G., and Yamazawa.
H.: Preliminary estimation of release amounts of 131I and 137Cs accidentally
discharged from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the
atmosphere, J. Nuclear Sci. Tech., 48, 1129–1134, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: An efficient thermal infrared radiation
parameterization for use in general circulation models, NASA Tech. Rep.
TM-1994-104606, Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA,
Houston, Tex., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V.,
Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model
advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational
mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8851,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003296</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Fulton, S. R. and Schubert, W. H.: Chebyshev spectral methods for
limited-area models. Part I: Model problem analysis, Mon. Weather Rev., 115,
1940–1965, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S. Y. and Pan, H. L.: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a
medium-range forecast model, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2322–2339, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S.-Y., Park, H., Cheong, H.-B., Kim, J.-E. E., Koo, M.-S., Jang, J.,
Ham, S., Hwang, S.-O., Park, B.-K., Chang, E.-C., and Li, H.: The
Global/Regional Integrated Model System (GRIMs), Asia-Pacific, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 219–243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-013-0023-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13143-013-0023-0</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Hoyer, J. M.: The ECMWF spectral limited area model, ECMWF Workshop Proc. on
Techniques for Horizontal Discretization in Numerical Weather Prediction
Models, 343–359, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Juang, H.-M. H.: Semi-Lagrangian advection without iteration, in: Proceedings
of the Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Central Weather
Bureau, Longtan, Taoyan, Taiwan, 277 pp., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Juang H.-M. H.: Mass conserving and positive-definite semi-Lagrangian
advection in NCEP GFS: decomposition of massively parallel computing without
halo, in: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop on Use of High Performance
Computing in Meteorology, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather
Forecasts, Reading, United Kingdom, 3–7 November 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Juang, H.-M. H. and Kanamitsu, M.: The NMC nested regional spectral model,
Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 3–26, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Juang, H.-M. H., Hong, S.-Y., and Kanamitsu, M.: The NCEP Regional Spectral
Model: An Update, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2125–2143, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J.,
Fiorino, M., and Potter, G. L.: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2), B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1631–1643, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M., Kanamaru, H., Cui, Y., and Juang, H.: Parallel implementation
of the regional spectral atmospheric model, CEC Report CEC-500-2005-014,
California Energy Commission, Sacramento, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M., Yoshimura, K., Yhang, Y.-B., and Hong, S.-Y.: Errors of
Interannual variability and Trend in Dynamical Downscaling of Reanalysis, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D17115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013511</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kang, H.-S. and Hong, S.-Y.: An assessment of the land surface parameters on
the simulated regional climate circulations: The 1997 and 1998 east Asian
summer monsoon cases, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15121,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009499</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Li, H., Kanamitsu, M., and Hong, S.-Y.: California reanalysis downscaling at
10 km using an ocean-atmosphere coupled regional model system, J. Geophys.
Res., 117, D12118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017372</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Maryon, R. H., Smith, F. B., Conway, B. J., and Goddard, D. M.: The U. K.
Nuclear Accident Model, Prog. Nucl. Energ., 26, 85–104, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Moorthi, S. and Suarez, M. J.: Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert: A parameterization
of moist convection for general circulation models, Mon. Weather Rev., 120,
978–1002, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Moorthi, S., Pan, H.-L., and Caplan, P.: Changes to the 2001 NCEP
operational MRF/AVN global analysis/forecast system, NWS Tech. Procedures
Bull., 484, 14 pp., available at: <uri>http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/tpb/484.htm</uri> (last access: 12 October 2015),
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Robert, A. J.: The Integration of a Low Order Spectral Form of the Primitive
Meteorological Equations, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 44, 237–245, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Saya, A., Yoshimura, K., and Oki, T.: Simulation of radioactive tracer
transport using IsoRSM and uncertainty analyses, Japan Soc. Civil Eng.,
69, I_1765–I_1770, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Segami, A., Kurihara, K., Nakamura, H., Ueno, M., Takano, I., and Tatsumi,
Y.: Operational mesoscale weather prediction with Japan spectral model, J.
Meteor. Soc. Japan, 67, 907–923, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Staniforth, A. and Côté, J.: Semi-Lagrangian Integration Schemes for
Atmospheric Models – A Review, Mon. Weather Rev., 119,
2206–2223, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Tatsumi, Y.: A spectral limited-area model with time dependent lateral
boundary conditions and its application to a multi-level primitive equation
model, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 64, 637–663, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Williamson, D. L.: The Evolution of Dynamical Cores for Global Atmospheric
Models, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85B, 241–269, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Yoshimura, K.: A tracer simulation with IsoRSM on the issue of Fukushima
Nuclear Accident, In proceedings of the 11th International RSM Workshop,
National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan, 15–19 August 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Yoshimura, K., Kanamitsu, M., and Dettinger, M.: Regional downscaling for
stable water isotopes: A case study of an atmospheric river event, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D18114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014032</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. and Juang, H.-M. H.: A mass-conserving
non-iteration-dimensional-split semi-Lagrangian advection scheme for
limited-area modelling, Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc., 138, 2118–2125,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1938" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.1938</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>A semi-Lagrangian advection scheme for radioactive tracers in the NCEP Regional Spectral Model (RSM)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">In this study, the non-iteration dimensional-split semi-Lagrangian (NDSL)
advection scheme is applied to the National Centers for Environmental
Prediction (NCEP) Regional Spectral Model (RSM) to alleviate the Gibbs
phenomenon. The Gibbs phenomenon is a problem wherein negative values of
positive-definite quantities (e.g., moisture and tracers) are generated by
the spectral space transformation in a spectral model system. To solve this
problem, the spectral prognostic specific humidity and radioactive tracer
advection scheme is replaced by the NDSL advection scheme, which considers
advection of tracers in a grid system without spectral space
transformations. A regional version of the NDSL is developed in this study
and is applied to the RSM. Idealized experiments show that the regional
version of the NDSL is successful. The model runs for an actual case study
suggest that the NDSL can successfully advect radioactive tracers
(iodine-131 and cesium-137) without noise from the Gibbs phenomenon. The
NDSL can also remove negative specific humidity values produced in spectral
calculations without losing detailed features.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aranami, K., Davies, T., and Wood, N.: A mass restoration scheme for
limited-area models with semi-Lagrangian advection, Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc.,
141, 1795–1803, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bourke, W.: An Efficient, One-Level, Primitive-Equation Spectral Model, Mon.
Weather Rev., 100, 683–689, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Chang, E.-C. and Hong, S.-Y.: Projected climate change scenario over East
Asia by a regional spectral model, J. Korean Earth Sci. Soc., 32, 770–783,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q.-S. and Kuo, Y.-H.: A harmonic-sine series expansion and its
application for partitioning and reconstruction problems in a limited area,
Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 91–112, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chino, M., Nakayama. H., Nagai. H., Terada. H., Katata. G., and Yamazawa.
H.: Preliminary estimation of release amounts of 131I and 137Cs accidentally
discharged from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the
atmosphere, J. Nuclear Sci. Tech., 48, 1129–1134, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: An efficient thermal infrared radiation
parameterization for use in general circulation models, NASA Tech. Rep.
TM-1994-104606, Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA,
Houston, Tex., 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V.,
Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model
advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational
mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8851,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Fulton, S. R. and Schubert, W. H.: Chebyshev spectral methods for
limited-area models. Part I: Model problem analysis, Mon. Weather Rev., 115,
1940–1965, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S. Y. and Pan, H. L.: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a
medium-range forecast model, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2322–2339, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S.-Y., Park, H., Cheong, H.-B., Kim, J.-E. E., Koo, M.-S., Jang, J.,
Ham, S., Hwang, S.-O., Park, B.-K., Chang, E.-C., and Li, H.: The
Global/Regional Integrated Model System (GRIMs), Asia-Pacific, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 219–243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-013-0023-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-013-0023-0</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Hoyer, J. M.: The ECMWF spectral limited area model, ECMWF Workshop Proc. on
Techniques for Horizontal Discretization in Numerical Weather Prediction
Models, 343–359, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Juang, H.-M. H.: Semi-Lagrangian advection without iteration, in: Proceedings
of the Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Central Weather
Bureau, Longtan, Taoyan, Taiwan, 277 pp., 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Juang H.-M. H.: Mass conserving and positive-definite semi-Lagrangian
advection in NCEP GFS: decomposition of massively parallel computing without
halo, in: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop on Use of High Performance
Computing in Meteorology, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather
Forecasts, Reading, United Kingdom, 3–7 November 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Juang, H.-M. H. and Kanamitsu, M.: The NMC nested regional spectral model,
Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 3–26, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Juang, H.-M. H., Hong, S.-Y., and Kanamitsu, M.: The NCEP Regional Spectral
Model: An Update, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2125–2143, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J.,
Fiorino, M., and Potter, G. L.: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2), B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1631–1643, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M., Kanamaru, H., Cui, Y., and Juang, H.: Parallel implementation
of the regional spectral atmospheric model, CEC Report CEC-500-2005-014,
California Energy Commission, Sacramento, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M., Yoshimura, K., Yhang, Y.-B., and Hong, S.-Y.: Errors of
Interannual variability and Trend in Dynamical Downscaling of Reanalysis, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D17115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013511</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kang, H.-S. and Hong, S.-Y.: An assessment of the land surface parameters on
the simulated regional climate circulations: The 1997 and 1998 east Asian
summer monsoon cases, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15121,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009499</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Li, H., Kanamitsu, M., and Hong, S.-Y.: California reanalysis downscaling at
10 km using an ocean-atmosphere coupled regional model system, J. Geophys.
Res., 117, D12118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017372</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Maryon, R. H., Smith, F. B., Conway, B. J., and Goddard, D. M.: The U. K.
Nuclear Accident Model, Prog. Nucl. Energ., 26, 85–104, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Moorthi, S. and Suarez, M. J.: Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert: A parameterization
of moist convection for general circulation models, Mon. Weather Rev., 120,
978–1002, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Moorthi, S., Pan, H.-L., and Caplan, P.: Changes to the 2001 NCEP
operational MRF/AVN global analysis/forecast system, NWS Tech. Procedures
Bull., 484, 14 pp., available at: <a href="http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/tpb/484.htm" target="_blank">http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/tpb/484.htm</a> (last access: 12 October 2015),
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Robert, A. J.: The Integration of a Low Order Spectral Form of the Primitive
Meteorological Equations, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 44, 237–245, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Saya, A., Yoshimura, K., and Oki, T.: Simulation of radioactive tracer
transport using IsoRSM and uncertainty analyses, Japan Soc. Civil Eng.,
69, I_1765–I_1770, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Segami, A., Kurihara, K., Nakamura, H., Ueno, M., Takano, I., and Tatsumi,
Y.: Operational mesoscale weather prediction with Japan spectral model, J.
Meteor. Soc. Japan, 67, 907–923, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Staniforth, A. and Côté, J.: Semi-Lagrangian Integration Schemes for
Atmospheric Models – A Review, Mon. Weather Rev., 119,
2206–2223, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Tatsumi, Y.: A spectral limited-area model with time dependent lateral
boundary conditions and its application to a multi-level primitive equation
model, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 64, 637–663, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Williamson, D. L.: The Evolution of Dynamical Cores for Global Atmospheric
Models, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85B, 241–269, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Yoshimura, K.: A tracer simulation with IsoRSM on the issue of Fukushima
Nuclear Accident, In proceedings of the 11th International RSM Workshop,
National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan, 15–19 August 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Yoshimura, K., Kanamitsu, M., and Dettinger, M.: Regional downscaling for
stable water isotopes: A case study of an atmospheric river event, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D18114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014032</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. and Juang, H.-M. H.: A mass-conserving
non-iteration-dimensional-split semi-Lagrangian advection scheme for
limited-area modelling, Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc., 138, 2118–2125,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1938" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1938</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
