References

GMD

Geoscientific Model Development

GMD

Geosci. Model Dev.

1991-9603

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/gmd-7-2345-2014

Droplet activation parameterization: the population-splitting concept revisited

Morales Betancourt

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5475-8605

¹ Nenes

¹ ²

School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

14 10 2014

7 5 2345 2357

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2345/2014/gmd-7-2345-2014.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2345/2014/gmd-7-2345-2014.pdf

In this work, we postulate, implement and evaluate modifications to the "population-splitting" concept, introduced by Nenes and Seinfeld (2003), for calculation of water-condensation rates in droplet-activation parameterizations. The population-splitting approximation consists of dividing the population of growing droplets into two categories: those that experience significant growth after exposed to a supersaturation larger than their critical supersaturation, and those that do not grow much larger than their critical diameter. The modifications introduced here lead to an improved accuracy and precision of the parameterization-derived maximum supersaturation, smax, and droplet-number concentration, Nd, as determined by comparing against those of detailed numerical simulations of the activation process. A numerical computation of the first-order derivatives ∂ Nd/∂ χj of the parameterized Nd to input variables χi was performed and compared against the corresponding parcel-model-derived sensitivities, providing a thorough evaluation of the impacts of the introduced modifications in the parameterization ability to respond to aerosol characteristics. An evaluation of the parameterization computation of Nd and smax against detailed numerical simulations of the activation process showed a relative error of −6.0% ± 6.2% for smax, and −2.7% ± 4.8% for Nd, which represents a considerable reduction in prediction bias when compared to earlier versions of the parameterization. The proposed modifications require only minor changes for their numerical implementation in existing codes based on the population-splitting concept.

References 1

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S.: A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6837–6844, 2000.

Abdul-Razzak, H., Ghan, S., and Rivera-Carpio, C.: A parameterization of aerosol activation: 1. Single aerosol type, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 6123–6131, 1998.

Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in large-scale models: Including effects of entrainment, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16206, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008473">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008473</a>, 2007.

Barahona, D., West, R. E. L., Stier, P., Romakkaniemi, S., Kokkola, H., and Nenes, A.: Comprehensively accounting for the effect of giant CCN in cloud activation parameterizations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2467–2473, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2467-2010">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2467-2010</a>, 2010.

Chuang, P. Y., Charlson, R. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Kinetic limitations on droplet formation in clouds, Nature, 390, 594–596, 1997.

Feingold, G. and Heymsfield, A.: Parameterizations of condensational growth of droplets for use in general circulation models, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 2325–2342, 1992.

Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: Continued development of a cloud droplet formation parameterization for global climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D11212, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005591">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005591</a>, 2005.

Fountoukis, C., Nenes, A., Meskhidze, N., Bahreini, R., Conant, W. C., Jonsson, H., Murphy, S., Sorooshian, A., Varutbangkul, V., Brechtel, F., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Aerosol – cloud drop concentration closure for clouds sampled during the International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation 2004 campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10S30, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007272">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007272</a>, 2007.

Ghan, S., Chuang, C., and Penner, J.: A parameterization of cloud droplet nucleation. Part I: Single aerosol type, Atmos. Res., 30, 198–221, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(93)90024-I">https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(93)90024-I</a>, 1993.

Ghan, S., Guzman, G., and Abdul-Razzak, H.: Competition between sea salt and sulfate particles as cloud condensation nuclei, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 3340–3347, 1998.

Ghan, S., Abdul-Razzak, H., Nenes, A., Ming, Y., Liu, X., Ovchinnikov, M., Meskhidze, N., Xu, J., and Shi, X.: Droplet nucleation: physically-based parameterization and comparative evaluation, J. Adv. Model. Earth. Syst., 3, D10S30, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000074">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000074</a>, 2011.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, .: Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: Working Group I Report: The Physical Science Basis, Geneva, IPCC 2007.

Kumar, P., Sokolik, I. N., and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cloud droplet formation for global and regional models: including adsorption activation from insoluble CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2517–2532, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2517-2009">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2517-2009</a>, 2009.

Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D., Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M., Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7017–7039, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010</a>, 2010.

Lathem, T. L., Kumar, P., Nenes, A., Dufek, J., Sokolik, I. N., Trail, M., and Russel, A.: Hygroscopic properties of volcanic ash, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L11802, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047298">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047298</a>, 2011.

Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W., Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 709–739, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</a>, 2012.

Meskhidze, N., Nenes, A., Conant, W. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Evaluation of a new cloud droplet activation parameterization with in situ data from CRYSTAL-FACE and CSTRIPE, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D16202, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005703">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005703</a>, 2005.

Ming, Y., Ramaswamy, V., Donner, L. J., and Phillips, V. T. J.: A new parameterization of cloud droplet activation applicable to general circulation models, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1348–1356, 2006.

Morales Betancourt, R. and Nenes, A.: Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4809–4826, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4809-2014">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4809-2014</a>, 2014.

Nenes, A. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in global climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4415, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002911">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002911</a>, 2003.

Nenes, A., Ghan, S., Abdul-Razzak, H., Chuang, P. Y., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Kinetic limitations on cloud droplet formation and impact on cloud albedo, Tellus, 53B, 133–149, 2001.

Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.

Pinsky, M., Khain, A., Mazin, I., and Korolev, A.: Analytical estimation of droplet concentration at cloud base, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D18211, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017753">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017753</a>, 2012.

Pruppacher, H. and Klett, J.: Microphysics of clouds and precipitation, Atmospheric and oceanographic sciences library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2nd rev, 1997.

Seinfeld, J. and Pandis, S.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, A Wiley-Intersciencie publications, Wiley, 2006.

Shipway, B. and Abel, S.: Analytical estimation of cloud droplet nucleation based on an underlying aerosol population, Atmos. Res., 96, 344–355, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.10.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.10.005</a>, 2010.

Sorjamaa, R. and Laaksonen, A.: The effect of H2O adsorption on cloud drop activation of insoluble particles: a theoretical framework, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6175–6180, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6175-2007">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6175-2007</a>, 2007.

Twomey, S.: The nuclei of natural cloud formation. Part II: The supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet concentration, Geof. Pura Appl., 43, 243–249, 1959.