<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-7-1573-2014</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>The generic MESSy submodel TENDENCY (v1.0) for process-based analyses in Earth system models</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eichinger</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6872-5700</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jöckel</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-1394</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Münchner Straße 20, Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234 Weßling, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>1573</fpage>
<lpage>1582</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2014 R. Eichinger</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1573/2014/gmd-7-1573-2014.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1573/2014/gmd-7-1573-2014.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1573/2014/gmd-7-1573-2014.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1573/2014/gmd-7-1573-2014.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>The tendencies of prognostic variables in Earth system models are
  usually only accessible, e.g. for output, as a sum over all physical,
  dynamical and chemical processes at the end of one time integration
  step.  Information about the contribution of individual processes to
  the total tendency is lost, if no special precautions are
  implemented.  The knowledge on individual contributions, however,
  can be of importance to track down specific mechanisms in the model
  system.  We present the new MESSy (Modular Earth Submodel System)
  infrastructure submodel TENDENCY and use it exemplarily within the
  EMAC (ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry) model to trace
  process-based tendencies of prognostic variables.  The main idea is
  the outsourcing of the tendency accounting for the state variables
  from the process operators (submodels) to the TENDENCY submodel
  itself.  In this way, a record of the tendencies of all
  process–prognostic variable pairs can be stored.  The selection of
  these pairs can be specified by the user, tailor-made for the
  desired application, in order to minimise memory requirements.
  Moreover, a standard interface allows the access to the individual
  process tendencies by other submodels, e.g. for on-line diagnostics
  or for additional parameterisations, which depend on individual
  process tendencies.  An optional closure test assures the correct
  treatment of tendency accounting in all submodels and thus serves to
  reduce the model&apos;s susceptibility.  TENDENCY is independent of the
  time integration scheme and therefore the concept is applicable to other model
  systems as well.  Test simulations with TENDENCY show an increase of
  computing time for the EMAC model (in a setup without atmospheric
  chemistry) of 1.8 ± 1% due to the additional subroutine calls
  when using TENDENCY.  Exemplary results reveal the dissolving
  mechanisms of the stratospheric tape recorder signal in height over
  time. The separation of the tendency of the specific humidity into
  the respective processes (large-scale clouds, convective clouds,
  large-scale advection, vertical diffusion and methane oxidation)
  show that the upward propagating water vapour signal dissolves
  mainly because of the chemical and the advective contribution. The
  TENDENCY submodel is part of version 2.42 or later of MESSy.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="10"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1">
<label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jöckel, P., Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Tost, H., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) – a new approach towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433–444, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-433-2005&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-433-2005&lt;/a&gt;, 2005.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Buchholz-Dietsch, J., Tost, H., Sander, R., and Pozzer, A.: Technical Note: Coupling of chemical processes with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) submodel TRACER, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1677–1687, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1677-2008&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1677-2008&lt;/a&gt;, 2008.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H., Baumgaertner, A., Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010&lt;/a&gt;, 2010.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mote, P., Rosenlof, K., Holton, J., Harwood, R., and Waters, J.: Seasonal variations of water vapor in the tropical lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 1093–1096, 1995.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mote, P., Rosenlof, K., Mclntyre, M., Carr, E., Gille, J., Holton, J., Kinnersley, J., Pumphrey, H., Russel, J., and Waters, J.: An atmospheric tape recorder: the imprint of tropical tropopause temperatures on stratospheric water vapor, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 3989–4006, 1996.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niwano, M., Yamazaki, K., and Shiotani, M.: Seasonal and QBO variations of ascent rate in the tropical lower stratosphere as inferred from UARS HALOE trace gas data, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4794, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003871&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003871&lt;/a&gt;, 2003.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weinstock, E., Hintsa, E., Dessler, A., and Anderson, J.: Measurements of water vapor in the tropical lower stratosphere during the CEPEX Campaign: results and interpretation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3231–3234, 1995.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>