GMD Geoscientific Model Development GMD Geosci. Model Dev. 1991-9603 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/gmd-2-267-2009 Quantifying atmospheric transport, chemistry, and mixing using a new trajectory-box model and a global atmospheric-chemistry GCM Riede H. 1 Jöckel P. 1 Sander R. 1 Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Air Chemistry Department, P.O. Box 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany 15 12 2009 2 2 267 280 Copyright: © 2009 H. Riede et al. 2009 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/2/267/2009/gmd-2-267-2009.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/2/267/2009/gmd-2-267-2009.pdf

We present a novel method for the quantification of transport, chemistry, and mixing along atmospheric trajectories based on a consistent model hierarchy. The hierarchy consists of the new atmospheric-chemistry trajectory-box model CAABA/MJT and the three-dimensional (3-D) global ECHAM/MESSy atmospheric-chemistry (EMAC) general circulation model. CAABA/MJT employs the atmospheric box model CAABA in a configuration using the atmospheric-chemistry submodel MECCA (M), the photochemistry submodel JVAL (J), and the new trajectory submodel TRAJECT (T), to simulate chemistry along atmospheric trajectories, which are provided offline. With the same chemistry submodels coupled to the 3-D EMAC model and consistent initial conditions and physical parameters, a unique consistency between the two models is achieved. Since only mixing processes within the 3-D model are excluded from the model consistency, comparisons of results from the two models allow to separate and quantify contributions of transport, chemistry, and mixing along the trajectory pathways. Consistency of transport between the trajectory-box model CAABA/MJT and the 3-D EMAC model is achieved via calculation of kinematic trajectories based on 3-D wind fields from EMAC using the trajectory model LAGRANTO. The combination of the trajectory-box model CAABA/MJT and the trajectory model LAGRANTO can be considered as a Lagrangian chemistry-transport model (CTM) moving isolated air parcels. The procedure for obtaining the necessary statistical basis for the quantification method is described as well as the comprehensive diagnostics with respect to chemistry. <br><br> The quantification method presented here allows to investigate the characteristics of transport, chemistry, and mixing in a grid-based 3-D model. The analysis of chemical processes within the trajectory-box model CAABA/MJT is easily extendable to include, for example, the impact of different transport pathways or of mixing processes onto chemistry. Under certain prerequisites described here, the results can be used to complement observations with detailed information about the history of observed air masses.

 References Arteta, J. and Cautenet, S.: Study of ozone distribution over the south-eastern France ({ESCOMPTE} campaign): discrimination between ozone tendencies due to chemistry and to transport, J. Atmos. Chem., 58, 111–130, 2007. Barbosa, P. M., Stroppiana, D., and Grégoir, J.-M.: An assessment of vegetation fire in Africa (1981–1991): Burned areas, burned biomass, and atmospheric emissions, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 933–950, 1999. Jang, J. C., Jeffries, H. E., and Tonnesen, S.: Sensitivity of ozone to model grid resolution – II.&nbsp;Detailed process analysis for ozone chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 29, 3101–3114. Jöckel, P., Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Tost, H., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) – a new approach towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433–444, 2005. Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Brühl, C., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Hoor, P., Kerkweg, A., Lawrence, M. G., Sander, R., Steil, B., Stiller, G., Tanarhte, M., Taraborrelli, D., van Aardenne, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5067–5104, 2006. J{ö}ckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., and Tost, H.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System,Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., in preparation, 2009. Kentarchos, A. S., Roelofs, G. J., and Lelieveld, J.: Altitude distribution of tropospheric ozone over the Northern Hemisphere during 1996, simulated with a chemistry-general circulation model at two different horizontal resolutions, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 17453–17469, 2001. Kerkweg, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: Simulation of detailed aerosol chemistry on the global scale using MECCA-AERO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2973–2985, 2007. Knudsen, B.&nbsp;M., Pommereau, J.-P., Garnier, A., Nunez-Pinharanda, M., Denis, L., Letrenne, G., Durand, M., and Rosen, J.&nbsp;M.: Comparison of stratospheric air parcel trajectories based on diffe-rent meteorological analyses, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3415–3424, 2001. Landgraf, J. and Crutzen, P.&nbsp;J.: An efficient method for online calculations of photolysis and heating rates, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 863–878, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055</a>, 1998. Lehmann, R.: An algorithm for the determination of all significant pathways in chemical reaction systems, J. Atmos. Chem., 47, 45–78, 2004. \bibitem[{{Manonom}(2000)}] Manonom2000 Manonom, R., Xiaoen, L., and Wongwises, P.: A new Lagrangian-Eulerian coupling model system, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 17, 587–600, 2000. McBride, J.&nbsp;L. and Ebert, E.&nbsp;E.: Verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts from operational numerical weather prediction models over Australia, Weather Forecast., 15, 103–121, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015</a>, 2000. McKenna, D.&nbsp;S., Konopka, P., Groo{ß}, J.-U., G{ü}nther, G., M{ü}ller, R., Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.: A new Chemical Lagrangian} Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) 1. Formulation of advection and mixing, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4309, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114</a>, 2002. \bibitem[{{Parrish} et&nbsp;al.(2007)}] Parrish2007 {Parrish, D. D., Stohl, A., Forster, C., Atlas, E. L., Blake, D. R., Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W. C., and de Gouw, J. A.: Effects of mixing on evolution of hydrocarbon ratios in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 112, 34, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007583">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007583</a>, 2007. Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere model, J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3824.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3824.1</a>, 2006. Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical note: The new comprehensive atmospheric chemistry module MECCA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 445-450, 2005. Sander, R., Gromov, S., Harder, H., Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Kubistin, D., Riede, H., Taraborrelli, D., and Xie, Z.-Q.: The atmospheric chemistry box model CAABA/MECCA-3.0, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., in preparation, 2009. Sandu, A. and Sander, R.: Technical note: Simulating chemical systems in Fortran90 and Matlab with the Kinetic PreProcessor KPP-2.1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 187–195, 2006. Scheele, M.&nbsp;P., Siegmund, P.&nbsp;C., and Velthoven, P. F.&nbsp;J.: Sensitivity of trajectories to data resolution and its dependence on the starting point: in or outside a tropopause fold, Meteorol. Appl., 3, 267–273, 1996. Sinnhuber, B.-M., Müller, R., J., L., Bovensmann, H., Eyring, V., Klein, U., Trentmann, J., Burrows, J.&nbsp;P., and Künzi, K.&nbsp;F.: Interpretation of mid-stratospheric Arctic ozone measurements using a photochemical box-model, J. Atmos. Chem., 34, 281–290, 1999. Stenke, A., Dameris, M., Grewe, V., and Garny, H.: Implications of Lagrangian transport for simulations with a coupled chemistry-climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5489–5504, 2009. Stohl, A.: Computation, accuracy and applications of trajectories – a review and bibliography, Atmos. Environ., 32, 947–966, 1998. Stohl, A., Wotawa, G., Seibert, P., and Kromp-Kolb, H.: Interpolation errors in wind fields as a function of spatial and temporal resolution and their impact on different types of kinematic trajectories, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 2149–2165, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034</a>, 1995. Stohl, A., Haimberger, L., Scheele, M.&nbsp;P., and Wernli, H.: An intercomparison of results from three trajectory models, Meteorol. Appl., 8, 127–135, 2001. Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, 2005. Wernli, H. and Davies, H.&nbsp;C.: A Lagrangian}-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. {I}: {The method and some applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 467–489, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1256/smsqj.53810">https://doi.org/10.1256/smsqj.53810</a>, 1997.