<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-19-5571-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Surface horizontal kinetic energy sensitivity to numerical parameters in tidal-resolving North and Equatorial Atlantic simulations</article-title><alt-title>Kinetic energy sensitivity in ocean models</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Laxenaire</surname><given-names>Rémi</given-names></name>
          <email>remi.laxenaire@univ-reunion.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5157-1821</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Chassignet</surname><given-names>Eric P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-7502</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Xiaobiao</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-7645</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wallcraft</surname><given-names>Alan J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Hiron</surname><given-names>Luna</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Arbic</surname><given-names>Brian K.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7969-2294</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Buijsman</surname><given-names>Maarten C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8478-5957</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Solano</surname><given-names>Miguel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Elipot</surname><given-names>Shane</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6051-5426</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire de l'Atmosphère et des Cyclones (LACy), UMR8105 (Université de la Réunion – CNRS – Météo-France), Université de La Réunion, Saint-Denis de La Réunion, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>School of Ocean Science and Engineering, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Rémi Laxenaire (remi.laxenaire@univ-reunion.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>5571</fpage><lpage>5599</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Rémi Laxenaire et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e191">Surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) reflects the distribution of ocean circulation across temporal and spatial scales, shaping energy transfer and mixing in the upper ocean. Quantifying both total SHKE and its frequency content helps characterize processes from low-frequency motions to tides and near-inertial waves, but SHKE variability is difficult to quantify with observations alone. High-resolution tidal-resolving ocean models can bridge gaps in our understanding, yet the modeling results depend on the realism of the configuration choices. In this study, we isolate the role of individual model parameters by comparing seven tidal-resolving HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) simulations of the North and Equatorial Atlantic, in which only one parameter is varied at a time. Surface drifters serve as the observational reference and numerical drifters are seeded in the reference experiment to quantify the distortion of the low frequency and tidal variance introduced by the Lagrangian sampling. This framework allows a controlled sensitivity analysis of the SHKE distribution across four frequency bands, separately for deep ocean and continental shelf waters. The experiments show that, within the range of configuration changes explored, horizontal resolution is the dominant control of offshore total SHKE whereas vertical refinement has a smaller impact offshore and a slightly stronger one on the shelf. Hourly wind forcing strongly amplifies the diurnal and near-inertial variability, finer bathymetry enhances the offshore semidiurnal energy, and internal wave drag controls the tidal-band energy equatorward of their critical latitudes while leaving the low-frequency motions nearly unchanged. Increasing the number of tidal-constituent from one (M<sub>2</sub>) to eight of the largest constituents sharply increases the diurnal SHKE and allows us to disentangle the tidal from the non-tidal fraction of the diurnal cycle. Taken together, these experiments show that the shelf and offshore subdomains respond differently to each parameter and that each frequency band is sensitive to a different set of parameters. These results quantify how the configuration choices shape the modeled total SHKE and its spectral distribution, and offer guidance for setting up high-resolution tide-resolving model experiments.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Office of Naval Research</funding-source>
<award-id>N00014-19-1-2712</award-id>
<award-id>N00014-19-1-2704</award-id>
<award-id>N00014-19-1-2717</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Science Foundation</funding-source>
<award-id>OCE-2242111</award-id>
<award-id>OCE-1851166</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e212">Advances in observations and remote sensing have dramatically improved the characterization of ocean velocity fields. For example, geostrophic velocities derived from altimetry provide a global perspective on the geostrophic component of the surface kinetic energy, and have yielded important insights into large-scale to mesoscale motions and their variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.1"/>. However, despite recent advances such as the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx89" id="paren.2"/>, the spatial and temporal resolution of altimetry remains insufficient to fully resolve smaller oceanographic features and higher frequency motions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> days). Observations of velocities from ADCPs and drifters can capture higher-frequency motions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> hourly), but these observations are typically limited in duration and geographically sparse.</p>
      <p id="d2e242">The advancement of computational capacity has allowed large-scale high-resolution numerical models to include submesoscale motions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.3"/> and tides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.4"/>. Numerical models therefore provide a complementary tool to study processes at high temporal and spatial resolution. These models are particularly relevant for the study of high-frequency motions such as internal tides, near-inertial waves, and motions spanning quasi-inertial to low-frequency motions. However, numerical models are, by construction, truncated representations of the ocean, and the modeled circulation is strongly dependent on parameter choices, such as mixing parameterizations and/or horizontal and vertical resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx94 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e256">Spectral decomposition of surface currents provides a powerful framework to separate and analyze the distribution of surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) across physically meaningful frequency bands. This approach enables the investigation of key interactions (e.g., wave–current coupling, nonlinear wave–wave transfers), the pathways of energy across scales, and even the tuning of model parameters. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.6"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.7"/> first applied rotary spectra to drifter observations, decomposing SHKE into anticyclonic and cyclonic components that could be mapped into distinct reservoirs of variability to quantify the near surface variability on global scales. Extending this method to model–observation comparisons, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.8"/> compared a global MIT General Circulation Model (MITgcm) simulation (LLC4320) to surface drifters in waters deeper than 500 m and demonstrated that surface drifters are an efficient database for assessment of the surface circulation predicted by a tide- and eddy-resolving global ocean model. Indeed, they found similar qualitative patterns in SHKE in both the model and observations, with a dominance of low frequencies and well-defined tidal and near-inertial peaks. Quantitative differences, however, emerged, such as energy deficit (e.g., at low latitudes, and at the near-inertial frequency) or excess (e.g., at the semidiurnal frequency) in the model relative to the observations. Subsequently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.9"/> compared the near-surface SHKE of another high-resolution global simulation performed with the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) to that of the MITgcm LLC4320 and the drifters' SHKE. The analysis focused on the vertical structure of the near-surface current by comparing results at the surface with those at 15 m depth. They found significant differences between surface and 15 m velocities in all frequency bands, except the semidiurnal band. The same energy deficit as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.10"/> remained present in the models near the equator when compared to observations, but the lack of energy at the near-inertial frequency was less pronounced in HYCOM than in the MITgcm. In addition, the HYCOM semidiurnal SHKE was found to be closer to estimates derived from surface drifter observations than the MITgcm semidiurnal SHKE. Although both <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.11"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.12"/> put forward several explanations for the differences between the modeled SHKE and the SHKE derived from surface drifter data, they acknowledged the inherent difficulty of comparing fields derived from Eulerian (models) and Lagrangian (observations) velocities. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.13"/> also pointed out several limitations in their ocean model comparison, i.e., different forcing and numerical parameters (e.g., vertical grid resolution, frequency of atmospheric wind forcing, presence or absence of wave drag), outputs from different years, and systematic model errors (e.g., issues with the tidal forcing in the MITgcm LLC4320 simulation). These limitations illustrate the difficulty of disentangling the respective roles of individual parameters when simulations differ simultaneously in multiple aspects, leaving open the question of which choices most strongly shape the modeled SHKE.</p>
      <p id="d2e284">In addition to parameter-related uncertainties, there is the distortion in SHKE that arises when estimating the low frequency and tidal variance from drifters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.14"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.15"/> systematically compared Eulerian and Lagrangian estimates of SHKE by seeding a large ensemble of numerical drifters into the global MITgcm LLC4320 using the v2.0 <italic>Parcels</italic> Python package <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.16"/> and showed that Lagrangian velocity spectra are generally smoother and tend to underestimate SHKE at low-frequency and in tidal bands, particularly in regions with strong low-frequency SHKE. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.17"/> systematically compared the Lagrangian and Eulerian frequency distributions in LLC4320 and confirmed the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.18"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.19"/>, i.e., that the semidiurnal energy in MITgcm LLC4320 is, on average, about twice the observed values and that HYCOM shows relatively minimal bias overall, though regional variations are apparent.</p>
      <p id="d2e310">In summary, the above studies highlight two main sources of ambiguity in their model–observation comparisons of SHKE: the simultaneous variation of multiple parameters between simulations, which prevents a clean attribution of SHKE differences to any specific choice, and the distortion introduced by Lagrangian sampling, which complicates the direct use of drifter observations as a reference. In this paper, we remove these ambiguities by (a) analyzing a series of experiments in which only a single parameter is varied at a time and (b) using numerical drifters to evaluate the level of agreement between the model and the observations and to quantify the bias arising from Lagrangian sampling. The central objective of the paper is to isolate and quantify the impact of the choices in numerical and forcing parameters on the modeled SHKE. This is achieved by relying on a suite of tidal-resolving HYCOM simulations of the North and Equatorial Atlantic (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>) that allows us to directly attribute SHKE differences to (a) grid resolution (horizontal and vertical), (b) bathymetry resolution, (c) forcing (wind frequency and tidal content), and (d) wave drag. This framework also enables us to extend the analysis from offshore/deep ocean waters (deeper than 500 m), covered by previous drifter-based comparisons, to inshore/continental shelf waters (shallower than 500 m), where the high-frequency SHKE is of particular importance, a region that surface drifter-based comparisons could not cover due to the lower density of observations. The Lagrangian comparison enables us to link the Eulerian-based sensitivity results directly to observations, without conflating genuine model biases with Lagrangian-Eulerian sampling differences.</p>
      <p id="d2e315">The article is organized as follows: Sect. 2 describes the seven HYCOM simulations, the implementation of the numerical drifters, and the surface drifter database used in the comparison. It also introduces the method used to calculate the rotary spectra. In Sect. 3, the domain-averaged SHKEs from all Eulerian and Lagrangian datasets are compared within a common framework, providing a global view of the datasets and identification of the spectral features they share. This section serves as the baseline for the comparisons performed in the following sections. In Sect. 4, the Lagrangian spectral estimates from the numerical drifter experiment are compared to the drifter observations and to the Eulerian model outputs. This section provides the link between the surface drifter observations and the Eulerian experiments analyzed in the following section. Section 5 systematically quantifies the impacts of the configuration and parameter choices listed above on the SHKE using the Eulerian frequency rotary spectra, with separate analyses conducted for deep ocean and continental shelf waters. The final section synthesizes the results by discussing the parameters that most strongly affect the SHKE distribution in each frequency band and by addressing which one could be adjusted to reduce the model-drifter gap.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methods</title>
      <p id="d2e326">This section describes the datasets and methods used throughout this study. All analyses are conducted within the North and Equatorial Atlantic (NEATL) domain, which extends from 28° S to 80° N (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a). The domain is divided into two subdomains: offshore/deep ocean waters and inshore/continental shelf waters, defined as 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cells whose median depth, estimated from the ETOPO1 database <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.20"/>, exceeds or is shallower than 500 m respectively. These two subdomains represent approximately 77 % and 23 % of the total NEATL domain area, respectively.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e350"><bold>(a)</bold> HYCOM NEATL domain in 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° bins of yellow (blue) regions indicating offshore (inshore) regions in waters deeper (shallower) than 500 m. <bold>(b–d)</bold> Number of 60 d trajectory segments per 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>1°  offshore bin for <bold>(b)</bold> the full OceanParcels experiment (OP Seed 1/2°), <bold>(c)</bold> the undrogued surface drifter observations, and <bold>(d)</bold> the subsampled OceanParcels experiment (OP Seed Drifters), constructed to reproduce the spatial sampling of the observed undrogued drifters. The total number of segments is indicated in the upper-left corner of panels <bold>(b)</bold> to <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Ocean Surface Drifters</title>
      <p id="d2e409">We use version 2.01 of the hourly data set from the Global Drifter Program <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.21"/> which includes 15 m-drogued and undrogued drifters. It is important to note that the positioning system used to track the drifters (Argos or GPS) can have an impact on the power spectral density of velocity. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.22"/> showed that the noise in the Argos positioning system adds high-frequency energy when compared to surface buoys equipped with GPS. In the NEATL domain (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a), the database of undrogued (drogued) drifters, which was downloaded on 30 April 2025, can be divided into 27 134 (25 956) continuous 60 d segments, each associated with its mean position over the segment duration. Among these, 11 591 (14 933) are from GPS-tracked drifters. Of the segments of both Argos and GPS-tracked undrogued (drogued) drifters, 26 109 (23 704), corresponding to 96 % (91 %) of the total, are located in offshore waters, reflecting the sparse coverage of surface drifters in coastal regions. Because SHKE is defined at the ocean surface, we focus on undrogued drifters in the following analyses, as they more accurately sample surface velocities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.23"/>. Undrogued drifters are known to carry a larger wind-slip error than drogued ones, reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−1</sup> per 10 m s<sup>−1</sup> wind speed compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−1</sup> downwind per 10 m s<sup>−1</sup> wind speed for drogued drifters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.24"/>, but this slip has not yet been comprehensively disentangled from genuine oceanic surface variability across frequencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.25"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for a discussion of the limitations of using undrogued versus drogued drifters for model comparison</named-content></xref>. The number of undrogued drifter segments per 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° cell in the offshore domain is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>c. The spatial distributions of the other drifter datasets (drogued and undrogued, GPS-tracked and all) are provided in Fig S1 in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e542">The NEATL HYCOM experiments, covering the Atlantic from 28° S to 80° N (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a), are part of a suite of eddying and submesoscale-enabled numerical simulations performed with HYCOM v2.3.01 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.26"/>. These simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.27"/> were performed to study and quantify the impact of horizontal and vertical resolution on the large-scale circulation and water mass transformations in the Atlantic. In this paper, we analyze three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° horizontal grid-spacing configurations (9 km at the equator, 6 km in the Gulf Stream region) and four <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° horizontal grid-spacing configurations (2.25 km at the equator, 1.5 km in the Gulf Stream region). Three of these configurations have been used previously in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.28"/>, while four simulations (NEATL12-T, NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub>, NEATL12-T-HVR, and NEATL50-T-WD) are analyzed for the first time. The simulations are integrated for 18 months with tidal forcing of the eight largest tidal constituents (K<sub>1</sub>, O<sub>1</sub>, P<sub>1</sub>, Q<sub>1</sub>, M<sub>2</sub>, S<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, and K<sub>2</sub>) after spin-up as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.29"/>. The last 12 months outputs are used in the analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e666">These simulations are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>, but are described in more details in the following: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e673">NEATL12-T is the tidal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° reference simulation with 6-hourly atmospheric forcing and 8 tidal constituents.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e689">NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub> is a twin experiment of NEATL12-T, but with only the semidiurnal tidal constituent (M<sub>2</sub>, 1.932 cycles per day (cpd)).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e711">NEATL12-T-HVR is a twin experiment of NEATL12-T, but with 96 vertical coordinates instead of 32.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e715">NEATL50-T is a twin experiment of NEATL12-T, but with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° horizontal grid-spacing and a coarse bathymetry linearly interpolated from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° grid-spacing topography of the NEATL12-T <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.30"/>. NEATL12-T's bathymetry is based on the 2' Naval Research Laboratory digital bathymetry database, which combines the global topography based on satellite altimetry of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.31"/> with several high-resolution regional databases.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e749">NEATL50-T-WD is a twin experiment of NEATL50-T. However, instead of having no wave drag as in NEATL50-T, a <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.32"/> internal wave drag with a multiplicative factor of 0.25 is applied to the bottom of the water column (we refer to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx15" id="text.33"/> for a discussion of this parameter).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e759">NEATL50-T-HB is a twin experiment of NEATL50-T, but with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° bathymetry that is derived from the 2019 version of the 15 arcsec General Bathymetric Chart of the Ocean data set <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.34"/> as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.35"/>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e781">NEATL50-T-HB-HF is a twin experiment of NEATL50-T-HB, but with higher-frequency, hourly wind stress variability from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Climate Forecast System Reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.36"/> instead of the 6-hourly wind forcing used in previous experiments.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e787">In the vertical dimension, the above simulations contain 32 or 96 hybrid layers with density referenced to 2000 m (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="altparen.37"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="altparen.38"/> for details). The vertical coordinate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.39"/> is isopycnal in the stratified open ocean and makes a dynamically smooth and time dependent transition to terrain-following coordinates in shallow coastal regions and to fixed pressure levels in the surface mixed layer and/or unstratified seas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.40"/>. No inflow or outflow is prescribed at the northern and southern boundaries. Within a buffer zone of about 3° from the northern and southern boundaries, the 3-D modeled temperature, salinity, and depth of isopycnal interfaces are restored to the monthly Generalized Digital Environmental Model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">GDEM,</named-content></xref> climatology with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding time of 5–60 d that increases with distance from the boundary. The initial conditions are derived from the GDEM climatology potential temperature and salinity and the atmospheric forcing is derived from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis ERA40 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.42"/> with 6-hourly wind anomalies from the Fleet Numerical Meteorology and Oceanography Center Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.43"/> for the year 2003. The year 2003 is considered a neutral year over the 1993–present timeframe in terms of long-term atmospheric patterns, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation. The reader is referred to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.44"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.45"/> for details on the parameterizations used in the model.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e842">Summary of the seven North and Equatorial Atlantic (NEATL) HYCOM simulations (updated from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="altparen.46"/>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Horizontal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bathymetry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Atmospheric forcing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Number of Tidal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Wave</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">layers</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">constituents</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">drag</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL12-T</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL12-T-HVR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL50-T</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL50-T-WD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Yes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL50-T-HB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL50-T-HB-HF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1261">To derive surface velocity from particles, and thus simulate the trajectories of surface drifters, we performed an OceanParcels experiment using the v2.3.2 <italic>Parcels</italic> Python package <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx88" id="paren.47"/>. This OceanParcels experiment (hereafter referred to as OP Seed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°) was conducted offline using  hourly 2D advecting velocity field (a combination of ocean current and wind-wave effects) outputs from the NEATL50-T-HB-HF numerical simulation. Particles were seeded every 30 d on a regular <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° grid between 15° S and 65° N in the NEATL domain and are advected with <italic>Parcels</italic> using a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme and no stochastic diffusion. The latitudinal restrictions were imposed to avoid proximity to the model open boundaries (located near 28° S and 80° N at the Fram Strait); the northern limit of 65° N also corresponds approximately to the Greenland-Scotland Ridge, which forms a natural boundary of the North Atlantic basin. Trajectories were then tracked for 60 d resulting in 11 seeding events over the one-year simulation and yielding 264 361 trajectory segments of which 244 632 (92 %) are located in offshore waters (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b).</p>
      <p id="d2e1319">To assess whether differences between simulated and observed statistics could arise solely from the irregular spatial distribution of real drifter observations, we constructed a subset of the OP Seed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° dataset that replicates the sampling characteristics of the undrogued surface drifter dataset (hereafter referred to as OP Seed Drifters; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>d). Specifically, for each 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° bin cell of OP Seed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°, we randomly selected trajectory segments such that the number of simulated segments in each cell matches the number of undrogued surface drifter segments observed in the same cell (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>d). In a few cases, close to northern and southern limits, the OP Seed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° dataset contained fewer segments than the undrogued drifter dataset for a given cell; in such cases, all available simulated segments were used. This approach keeps the spatial sampling density of the OP Seed Drifters as close as possible to that of the observational dataset, ensuring that any differences found in subsequent analyses cannot be attributed to sampling bias. The resulting subset contains 24 302 trajectory segments of 60 d each, of which 23 579 (97 %) are located in offshore waters (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>d).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Analysis methods</title>
      <p id="d2e1380">Building upon the methodologies outlined in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.48"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.49"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.50"/>, frequency rotary spectra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.51"/> at each model grid point (Eulerian) and along drifter trajectories (Lagrangian) are computed from surface horizontal velocity time series taken from the HYCOM simulation and surface drifter data. Rotary velocity spectra break down velocity variance into contributions from different frequencies and separate clockwise from counterclockwise components, thereby distinguishing anticyclonic from cyclonic energy. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.52"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.53"/>, velocity variance is estimated and interpreted as kinetic energy; no factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is included in the calculations.</p>
      <p id="d2e1414">To compute spectra, hourly velocity time series (generated at each grid point for the Eulerian estimate and derived from particle velocities for the Lagrangian estimate) are segmented into 60 d periods with a 50 % overlap and linearly detrended. For both the model and drifter data, complex-valued fields (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent zonal and meridional velocity components, respectively) are multiplied by a Hanning window before computing the 1-D discrete Fourier transform. Spectral estimates are obtained by multiplying the Fourier coefficients by their complex conjugates and averaged over segments. Finally, as per <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.54"/>, the rotary frequency spectral densities are adjusted by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to account for the windowing operation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.55"/>. The resulting Power Spectral Density (PSD) of the rotary spectra corresponds to a 1-year period for the numerical products (both Eulerian and Lagrangian) and spans more than 30 years for the surface drifters (from the end of the 1980s to the beginning of the 2020s).</p>
      <p id="d2e1464">To decompose SHKE, the velocity rotary spectra are integrated over four frequency bands: high-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd, with cpd stands for cycles per day), near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd, excluding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude band around the equator,  with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the Coriolis parameter), semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd), and diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd). In addition to these estimated SHKE components, the total SHKE (i.e., the time-mean of the instantaneous values squared) and low-frequency SHKE (total SHKE minus high-frequency SHKE) are computed. It is worth noting that in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.56"/>, SHKE maps from drifters were obtained slightly differently: the authors band-pass or low-pass filtered the drifter velocity time series and then computed the variance of the filtered velocities within bins. As stated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.57"/>, both methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.58"/> yield similar results. This allows us to use the same approach for both Eulerian and Lagrangian fields.</p>
      <p id="d2e1543">Finally, the spectra and SHKE are averaged within 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° cells in the NEATL domain. Given that the vast majority of Lagrangian segments (96 % of undrogued drifters and 92 % of OP segments) are located in offshore waters, the Lagrangian analysis is constrained to the offshore domain, consistently with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.59"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.60"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.61"/>. For the Eulerian fields, both subdomains are considered. The resulting gridded rotary spectra and SHKE partitions produced for this study are archived at SEANOE (NetCDF and associated README; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="altparen.62"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Domain averaged surface kinetic energy distributions</title>
      <p id="d2e1579">In this section, we analyze the surface rotary velocity spectra and surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) integrated over selected frequency bands and over the entire NEATL domain. The 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° gridded spectra and SHKE are averaged using weights proportional to the surface area of each cell, separately for the offshore and continental shelf subdomains (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a). This analysis  provides the baseline for the subsequent detailed comparisons between observed and modeled drifters, Lagrangian and Eulerian estimates, and the numerical sensitivity experiments.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1598">Rotary spectra of surface horizontal kinetic energy averaged over offshore regions for the NEATL domain between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 and 5 cycles per day (cpd) from the HYCOM simulations, OceanParcels (OP) experiments and from surface drifters. Cyclonic and anticyclonic motions are assigned to positive and negative frequencies, respectively. The vertical gray lines indicate tidal frequencies in both positive and negative frequency domains from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.63"/>. Note the decimal logarithmic scale for the Power Spectrum Density (PSD).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1620">Surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) averaged over the NEATL domain for the seven HYCOM experiments, the OceanParcels (OP) experiments, and surface drifters. For both types of surface drifters (drogued and undrogued), two datasets are considered, one that includes GPS-tracked drifters only and one  with all drifters (both Argos and GPS positioning systems). Presented below are the total SHKE, and percentage of the total SHKE stored in low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd); diurnal frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd); semidiurnal frequency  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd); and near-inertial frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5° latitude) reservoirs (see Table S1 in the Supplement for absolute value of SHKE in each reservoirs). Each cell shows SHKEd/SHKEs where SHKEd and SHKEs represent SHKE values computed in waters deeper and shallower than 500 m, respectively. SHKEs are not provided for Lagrangian fields (i.e., OP and drifters) due to the low density of observations in these regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low freq</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Diurnal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Semidiurnal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Near-Inertial</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−2</sup>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">% Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">% Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">% Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"> % Total</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL12-T</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">126.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">92.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL12-T-HVR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">107.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">151.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL50-T</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">127.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">92.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL50-T-WD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">124.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">93.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL50-T-HB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">118.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">136.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NEATL50-T-HB-HF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OP Seed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">122.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OP Seed drifters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">122.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Undrogued drifters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Undrogued drifters GPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">146.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Drogued drifters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Drogued drifters GPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">101.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2744">The rotary spectra for the observed surface drifters, the OceanParcels numerical drifters, and the seven HYCOM simulations, computed and averaged over the NEATL offshore domain (depth greater than 500 m), are displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>. The overall pattern is similar for all, with higher energy levels at low frequencies, forming a broad peak, and with kinetic energy decreasing as the absolute value of the frequency increases and with pronounced peaks at the tidal forcing frequencies. Within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 cpd range, the spectra are not symmetric about zero frequency, with consistently more energy on the anticyclonic domain (assigned to negative frequencies in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>), reflecting the predominance of the anticyclonic near-inertial oscillations. All Eulerian estimates exhibit peaks at the tidal frequencies (gray lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>), with the exception of NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub>, which is forced solely by the M<sub>2</sub> constituent and therefore lacks the other tidal peaks. The peaks in SHKE at higher frequencies are either absent or less marked in the Lagrangian datasets (i.e., observed and numerical drifters), in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.64"/>. The most notable difference among the datasets lies in the level of energy in the high-frequency internal gravity wave continuum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.65"/> with the highest values in the observed drifters datasets (drogued and undrogued) and the lowest in the coarse-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° horizontal grid-spacing simulations. There is a significant increase of energy in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° (Lagrangian and Eulerian) horizontal grid-spacing simulations, but they do not reach the level of the observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e2809">To obtain a quantitative measure of the differences, we also compute the domain-averaged surface SHKE and its distribution across different frequency bands for all datasets. In order to compare variations in energy distribution among datasets that do not have the same total SHKE, we express the energy in each frequency reservoir as a fraction of the total SHKE (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e2814">As pointed out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.66"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.67"/>, most of the energy in the offshore domain waters (deeper than 500 m) is contained in the low-frequency band, representing 83 %–93 % of the total SHKE for the numerical simulations and 64 %–78 % for the drifters (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). This is expected given that large- and mesoscale motions account for most of the oceanic kinetic energy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.68"/>. In contrast, the diurnal, semidiurnal and near-inertial narrower frequency intervals contain between one and two orders of magnitude less energy. Although their fractional contribution is small, high-frequency motions play an important role since they are the main pathways for energy transfer and mixing in the ocean interior <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.69"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2831">When we extend the analysis of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.70"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.71"/> to waters shallower than 500 m, the results (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>) are markedly different, with the total SHKE being higher on average inshore than offshore and with the low-frequency band accounting for only 45 %–50 % of the total (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>), leaving considerably more energy associated with higher-frequency motions in inshore areas. In the diurnal band, the difference in the energy between offshore and inshore varies across configurations with no consistent pattern, but there is a striking difference in the semidiurnal and near-inertial bands. For the semidiurnal band, the continental shelf can contain up to 25 times more energy fraction than the deep ocean, while the near-inertial band shows a more moderate but still significant enhancement by a factor of 3 to 4 (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> and S1 in the Supplement). Tidal shoaling implies that, as water depth decreases, mass conservation requires higher barotropic velocities and hence larger SHKE of the barotropic tide, even if a portion of the barotropic energy is converted into internal tides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.72"><named-content content-type="pre">see demonstration of a tidal wave crossing a slope without reflection or friction in</named-content></xref>. However, shoaling should affect both the diurnal and semidiurnal bands similarly, which is not what we observe. In addition, in the NEATL domain, several shelf and marginal basins exhibit resonant behavior that selectively amplifies tidal components, depending on their geometry. Diurnal resonances occur in regions such as the Gulf of Mexico <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.73"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, whereas semidiurnal resonances are prominent in the Hudson Bay <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.74"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, the North Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.75"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, the English Channel and Irish Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.76"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, and the Bay of Fundy–Gulf of Maine system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.77"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Therefore, area-averaged diagnostics cannot fully explain the differences between offshore and inshore energy frequency decomposition. Assessing how numerical parameter choices affect the spatial distribution of SHKE requires first establishing a reliable observational reference (Sect. 4), before examining sensitivities through the experimental framework (Sect. 5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Lagrangian spectral estimates of SHKE</title>
      <p id="d2e2885">Comparing model outputs to surface drifter observations requires accounting for the distortion in the low frequency and tidal variance introduced by the Lagrangian nature of drifter sampling. To this end, we compare rotary spectra from undrogued drifters with those from OP Seed Drifters, a subset of numerical particles advected in the NEATL50-T-HB-HF simulation and subsampled to replicate the number and spatial distribution of undrogued drifter segments. NEATL50-T-HB-HF is our “best” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° experiment (fine bathymetry and hourly winds) in the sense that it most closely matches observations in the globally averaged rotary spectra (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). We then compare the same Lagrangian estimates to their Eulerian counterpart.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Observed versus numerical drifters</title>
      <p id="d2e2909">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>, only the GPS-tracked drifters were used to minimize the noise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="paren.78"/>. In contrast, all undrogued drifters are included in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>, as restricting the analysis to GPS-tracked drifters would lead to insufficient spatial coverage in parts of the domain (e.g., the equatorial South Atlantic; see Fig. S1 in the Supplement).</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2921">Comparison of OP Seed Drifters (first column) and undrogued surface drifters (second column), with a normalized ratio obtained by dividing the first column by the sum of the first and second columns (third column); a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates equal energies. The first row <bold>(a–c)</bold> shows the zonally averaged rotary spectra in 1° latitude bins computed over the offshore domain (waters deeper than 500 m) in the NEATL domain; note the decimal logarithmic color scale for panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>. The subsequent rows show maps of surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) components over the NEATL domain: low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd; second row <bold>(d–f)</bold>); diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd; third row <bold>(g–i)</bold>); semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd; fourth row <bold>(j–l)</bold>); and near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd restricted poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude; fifth row <bold>(m–o)</bold>). Note the decimal logarithmic color scale for all map panels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3027">The zonally averaged rotary spectra of OP Seed Drifters and undrogued drifters are shown in the first row of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>. Before contrasting the two datasets, we note that, near 30° N, the inertial frequency (grey dashed line) coincides with the diurnal tidal frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 cpd), making it difficult to disentangle their respective contributions. This latitude corresponds to the diurnal critical latitude (e.g., 27.6° for O<sub>1</sub> and 30° for K<sub>1</sub>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="altparen.79"/>), defined as the latitude where the inertial frequency equals the tidal frequency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.80"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. According to linear internal wave theory, it marks the poleward limit of wave propagation so, poleward of 30°, diurnal internal tides become evanescent. The critical latitude for the semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 cpd) band is much higher, around 75° (e.g., 74.5° for M<sub>2</sub> and 85.7° for S<sub>2</sub>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx78" id="altparen.81"/>), allowing semidiurnal internal waves to propagate across most of the global ocean.</p>
      <p id="d2e3095">The pattern of the zonally averaged PSD of rotary spectra is similar between the observed and numerical drifters (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a and b). However, the observed drifters show more energy in the high-frequency band, while the semidiurnal and diurnal peaks are, at most latitudes, more pronounced in the NEATL50-T-HB-HF numerical drifters. As discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.82"/>, this high-frequency content in the observed drifters may originate from the drifter tracking system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="paren.83"/> and/or from artifacts in the estimation of drifter positions and velocities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.84"/>. Overall, the numerical drifters contain less total SHKE than the observed undrogued surface drifters (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). Yet, they contribute to a significantly higher fraction to the low-frequency band, storing 83.3 % of the total SHKE (87.8 % of OP Seed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°). In comparison, the undrogued drifters store 75.3 % in the low-frequency band (64.3 % for GPS-tracked drifters). In absolute and relative terms, the numerical particles exhibit more energy than observed in the semidiurnal and near-inertial bands.</p>
      <p id="d2e3124">The normalized ratio (right column in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>) reveals clear spatial contrasts between the numerical simulation and the observations. Indeed, there is a striking bipolar pattern in the diurnal band (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>i) that is more pronounced in the observations with higher SHKE poleward of the diurnal critical latitude and less equatorward of it. This observed poleward diurnal energy is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.85"/>, who reported that diurnal motions are driven not only by tides, but also by the day/night solar heating cycle. At low frequencies, the model indicates higher SHKE in energetic regions such as the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf Stream whereas the surface drifters show the opposite (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>f). In the semidiurnal and near-inertial bands, the pattern reverses, with observations exhibiting higher SHKE in these energetic regions, whereas the model distributes energy more broadly (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>l and o). The effect of temporal coverage mismatch, resulting from the difference between the 30-year observational record and the single-year OP drifter simulation, is also weakly discernible in the near-inertial band. Indeed, the two narrow bands of enhanced near-inertial energy between 20 and 30° N in panel (m) of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> for the 1-year numerical OceanParcels simulation correspond to the tracks of Hurricanes Fabian and Kate of the 2003 season (the atmospheric forcing year of the simulation), a feature that is even more apparent in the Eulerian fields (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>m).</p>
      <p id="d2e3143">Overall, the undrogued surface drifter data contains more total SHKE than NEATL50-T-HB-HF numerical particles, with the model over-representing the fraction of energy in the near-inertial and tidal reservoirs. Regionally, the sign of the model–observation discrepancy depends on the frequency band. At low frequencies, the modeled energy exceeds the observed one in the western boundary currents, whereas the reverse holds elsewhere. By contrast, in the semidiurnal and near-inertial bands, the observed energy exceeds the modeled one in these same energetic regions. The largest discrepancy is in the diurnal band. South of the diurnal critical latitude, where internal tides radiate freely, the modeled diurnal energy exceeds the observed one while observations exceed the modeled one poleward, where only non-tidal mechanisms can sustain diurnal energy. Whether these discrepancies reflect genuine model biases or arise partly from the Lagrangian sampling framework is examined in the following subsection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Lagrangian versus Eulerian sampling</title>
      <p id="d2e3154">The previous subsection established the differences between OP Seed Drifters and undrogued surface drifters. The effect of drifter sampling density on the 60 d segments and corresponding spectra was found to be small and spatially incoherent (see comparison between the high density OP Seed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° and subsampled OP Seed Drifters in Fig. S2 and Sect S3 of the Supplement). Restricting the undrogued drifter statistics to the OP Seed Drifters footprint (between 25° S and 65° N, not shown) yields nearly identical frequency distributions (to within 0.1 percentage points), with only a modest increase of total SHKE from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137.8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−2</sup>. This confirms that the spatial coverage of the OP experiments is not the main driver of the frequency-distribution mismatch between the model and the observations.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3217">Comparison of NEATL50-T-HB-HF (first column) and OP Seed Drifters (second column), with a normalized ratio obtained by dividing the first column by the sum of the first and second columns (third column); a ratio of 1/2 indicates equal energies. The first row <bold>(a–c)</bold> shows the zonally averaged rotary spectra in 1°  latitude bins computed over the offshore domain (waters deeper than 500 m) in the NEATL domain; note the decimal logarithmic color scale for panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>. The subsequent rows show maps of surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) components over the NEATL domain: low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd; second row <bold>(d–f)</bold>); diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd; third row <bold>(g–i)</bold>); semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd; fourth row <bold>(j–l)</bold>); and near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd restricted poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude; fifth row <bold>(m–o)</bold>). Note the decimal logarithmic color scale for all map panels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3308">The zonally averaged PSD is overall similar between the native Eulerian fields and OP Seed Drifters (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a and b), but the tidal peaks are broader and increasingly indiscernible at higher frequencies in the Lagrangian spectra (e.g., the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 cpd peaks are barely discernible in the Lagrangian but prominent in the Eulerian). This spectral broadening redistributes energy away from peak centers toward neighboring frequencies, as shown by the ratio in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c and consistent with observations from earlier work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx98" id="paren.86"/>. Above approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.5 cpd, the Eulerian spectrum shows clear mirror images of the inertial ridge at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd that appear as a surplus of Eulerian over Lagrangian energy (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c), while these features are barely discernible in the OP Seed Drifter (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b) and undrogued drifters spectra (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b). Their presence in our Eulerian fields corroborates the interpretation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.87"/>, namely that such mirror images, previously identified in global surface drifters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.88"/> and in both Eulerian and Lagrangian global tide-resolving simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.89"/>, reflect genuine oceanic processes. However, the attenuation of these mirror images in the Lagrangian spectrum suggests that the undrogued drifter sampling in the NEATL domain, although adequate for the frequency bands considered here, may under-resolve these weaker high-frequency features.  Domain-averaged energy in specific frequency reservoirs (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> and S1) shows that the different velocities (Lagrangian vs. Eulerian) have minimal impact on total SHKE and in low, diurnal, and near-inertial bands. However, significant deviations occur in the semidiurnal frequency band with Eulerian velocities containing up to 50 % more energy than Lagrangian velocities. The SHKE maps (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>) confirm comparable levels of energy for low, diurnal and near-inertial frequencies. In the semidiurnal band, OP Seed Drifters show less energy over most of the domain with a notable exception at the Amazon shelf (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>j), a well-known hotspot of semidiurnal barotropic and internal tides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx84" id="paren.90"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> where Lagrangian particles are advected across strong velocity gradients at each tidal cycle, likely amplifying the apparent tidal energy relative to Eulerian estimates.</p>
      <p id="d2e3377">The comparison of Lagrangian and Eulerian estimates (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>) shows that the differences observed between OP Seed Drifters and undrogued surface drifters (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>) cannot be attributed to the Lagrangian sampling alone. In particular, the lower (higher) energy poleward (equatorward) of  30° N and the deficit of high frequency energies in the model relative to observations are not visible when comparing OP Seed Drifters to the Eulerian fields, confirming that these are genuine dataset differences rather than an outcome of the Lagrangian sampling. Note that the high-frequency deficit in the simulations could partially be the result of drifter tracking and position-estimation artifacts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.91"/> or wind slippage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.92"/> instead of real oceanic motions. Similarly, the higher observed SHKE in strong low-frequency flow, seen in the near-inertial and semidiurnal bands of the observation compared to the numerical drifters, is not recovered as a Lagrangian/Eulerian difference in our twin-simulation experiments. This contrasts with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.93"/>, who reported a Lagrangian underestimation of low-frequency and diurnal KE relative to the Eulerian field in regions of strong low-frequency flow. This apparent disagreement may be a consequence of a difference in experimental design as their analysis relied on a very large ensemble of particles distributed throughout the same simulation, providing the statistical power to isolate small Lagrangian sampling effects on energetic mesoscale regions. As in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.94"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.95"/>, the main effect of the Lagrangian sampling is the spectral broadening of tidal peaks which has a negligible impact on the frequency distribution of low, diurnal and near-inertial bands (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). In the semidiurnal band, however, the broadening is more pronounced, with the Eulerian fields storing 2.6 % of total SHKE compared to 1.7 % in the Lagrangian experiment, implying that part of any semidiurnal discrepancy between observations and Eulerian model output may reflect the Lagrangian/Eulerian framework itself.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Impact of model configuration and parameter choices on SHKE</title>
      <p id="d2e3412">Overall, the fact that the numerical simulations have less total SHKE than the observed undrogued drifters and that all also allocate a larger fraction of that energy to low frequencies (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>) is not a consequence of the drifters' Lagrangian sampling. There are, however, large differences in the other frequency bands among the numerical sensitivity experiments when compared to the observations and those are not uniform (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). To quantify these differences, we analyze in detail the controlled series of sensitivity experiments where a single model parameter at a time to document the influence of resolution, tidal content, wind-forcing frequency, bathymetry, and wave drag, respectively.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Number of tidal components</title>
      <p id="d2e3426">NEATL12-T and NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub> differ only in the number of tidal components forcing the model (eight largest tidal constituents and M<sub>2</sub> only, respectively). Their zonally averaged rotary spectra are broadly similar (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a–c), but NEATL12-T has greater energy in the vicinity of the tidal peaks. This is particularly evident in the normalized ratio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c), except at the exact position of the M<sub>2</sub> frequency (around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd) and its pure second harmonic (around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.96"/>), where the tidal peak of NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub> is comparable to that of NEATL12-T (i.e., normalized ratio near 0.5 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c). Globally, the total SHKE remains essentially unchanged between the two runs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>), with a slight decrease offshore and a more notable increase on the shelf in NEATL12-T. When fewer constituents are retained, the low-frequency component contains a slightly larger fraction of the total SHKE (i.e., 91.8 % offshore and 45.7 % inshore in NEATL12-T against 92.4 % offshore and 48.7 % inshore in NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub>) while the near-inertial bands contain a slightly smaller fraction. There is also an increase in the semidiurnal fraction of total SHKE in NEATL12-T compared to NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub> but the diurnal band concentrates the strongest contrast, with NEATL12-T more energetic both offshore and inshore but the largest differences are on the coast (a factor of three in both absolute and relative terms).</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3518">Comparison of NEATL12-T (first column) and NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub> (second column), with a normalized ratio obtained by dividing the first column by the sum of the first and second columns (third column); a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates equal energies. The first row <bold>(a–c)</bold> shows the zonally averaged rotary spectra in 1°  latitude bins computed over the offshore domain (waters deeper than 500 m) in the NEATL domain; note the decimal logarithmic color scale for panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>. The subsequent rows show maps of surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) components over the NEATL domain: low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd; second row <bold>(d–f)</bold>); diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd; third row <bold>(g–i)</bold>); semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd; fourth row <bold>(j–l)</bold>); and near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd restricted poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude; fifth row <bold>(m–o)</bold>). Note the decimal logarithmic color scale for all map panels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3630">Regionally (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>), no clear contrast between the two experiments emerges in the low-frequency, semidiurnal, and near-inertial bands with NEATL12-T being slightly more energetic in most of the domain. The diurnal band tells a different story with a clear separation at 30° N. Poleward of 30° N the two experiments are comparable offshore, whereas equatorward of 30° N NEATL12-T is significantly more energetic. On the shelves, the NEATL12-T excess of diurnal SHKE is present at all latitudes, including north of 30° N.</p>
      <p id="d2e3636">Overall, adding more tidal components increases, as expected, the energy at the added frequencies, with the largest increase on the continental shelves where, through tidal shoaling, the barotropic tidal amplitudes are largest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.97"/>. In the semidiurnal band, the slightly smaller fraction found in NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub> might reflect the absence of S<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, and K<sub>2</sub> constituents, which together contribute a non-negligible share of the global semidiurnal signal. Offshore and poleward of 30° N, the diurnal signal is nearly identical in both runs, highlighting that, as discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.98"/>, a large fraction of the diurnal flow is non-tidal. Possible sources for this non-tidal diurnal SHKE are the wind variability  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.99"/> (further discussed in Section 5.6) and/or aliasing of mesoscale variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.100"/>. By contrast, the diurnal energy is substantially larger  near the equator and on the shelves in NEATL12-T than in NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub>, showing that the diurnal tidal constituents (K<sub>1</sub>, O<sub>1</sub>, P<sub>1</sub>, Q<sub>1</sub>) dominate the local diurnal variability in these regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Horizontal resolution</title>
      <p id="d2e3744">NEATL50-T and NEATL12-T differ only in horizontal resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°, respectively). The zonally averaged rotary spectra (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a–c) show that NEATL50-T is significantly more energetic at nearly all frequencies (see Fig. 2 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.101"/> for a comparison of the time evolution of the domain-averaged total 3D kinetic energy where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° has approximately 70 % more energy than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°). This is confirmed by examining the ratio in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>c and particularly true for frequencies whose absolute value exceeds 2 cpd. However, NEATL50-T and NEATL12-T have close levels of energy at tidal peaks close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd. The only exception to the rule that higher resolution yields higher energy is that NEATL12-T has more energy in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd frequency band, which corresponds to near-inertial motions in the northern hemisphere but to the cyclonic side of the spectrum in the southern hemisphere. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> quantifies that the SHKE in the deep ocean increases by around one-third when the horizontal resolution increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° horizontal grid-spacing; however, the differences are less pronounced on the continental shelf. The excess of energy is, roughly, well distributed across the different reservoirs, as the percentage of the total SHKE stored in each compartment is comparable between the two experiments. In detail, the most noticeable difference occurs in the deep ocean where the percentage of total SHKE stored in the near-inertial band decreases by one-third (from 6 % to 4 %) as the resolution increases.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3856">Comparison of NEATL50-T (first column) and NEATL12-T (second column), with a normalized ratio obtained by dividing the first column by the sum of the first and second columns (third column); a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates equal energies. The first row <bold>(a–c)</bold> shows the zonally averaged rotary spectra in 1° latitude bins computed over the offshore domain (waters deeper than 500 m) in the NEATL domain; note the decimal logarithmic color scale for panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>. The subsequent rows show maps of surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) components over the NEATL domain: low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd; second row <bold>(d–f)</bold>); diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd; third row <bold>(g–i)</bold>); semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd; fourth row <bold>(j–l)</bold>); and near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd restricted poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude; fifth row <bold>(m–o)</bold>). Note the decimal logarithmic color scale for all map panels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3959">Over most of the domain (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>), the NEATL50-T simulation has significantly more energy than NEATL12-T at low, diurnal, and semidiurnal frequencies. However, the opposite is true for the near-inertial frequency. By contrast, near 30° latitude in the diurnal band, NEATL12-T has more energy than NEATL50-T, but this corresponds to the latitude where energy stored in the near-inertial band overlaps with that in the diurnal band <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.102"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3968">Overall, increasing the horizontal resolution leads to a substantial increase in total SHKE across most of the energy spectrum, consistent with previous studies. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.103"/> showed that high horizontal-resolution simulations have much higher values of kinetic energy for low frequency motions compared to low-resolution simulations. For tidal frequencies, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.104"/> found that increasing the horizontal resolution in realistic HYCOM simulations from 8 to 4 km increased the semidiurnal barotropic-to-baroclinic tidal conversion by half, and more baroclinic modes were resolved. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.105"/> also found that decreasing the horizontal grid spacing leads to more realistic internal wave frequency spectra. The increase in horizontal resolution also leads to a better representation of the submesoscale field, and increases wave-mean and wave–wave interactions, explaining the filling of the high-frequency continuum between the tidal peaks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.106"/> in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° simulations when compared to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° simulations (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>c). There are two exceptions to this overall increase in SHKE. First, the semidiurnal fraction of the inshore SHKE decreases from 48.0 % to 43.4 % while the offshore fraction barely changes (1.9 % to 2.0 %; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). A possible explanation is that over continental shelves, where the semidiurnal signal is predominantly barotropic and a large fraction of the global M<sub>2</sub> energy is dissipated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.107"/>, enhanced barotropic-to-baroclinic conversion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.108"/> redistributes energy away from the barotropic tide, while the generated internal tide radiates seaward and is not retained locally. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.109"/> also suggested that insufficient horizontal resolution could enhance the semidiurnal peak by inhibiting scattering of tidal energy into the wave continuum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.110"/>. Second, the near-inertial band is weaker on average at the higher horizontal resolution. One possible interpretation could be a more efficient vertical transport of near-inertial kinetic energy into the ocean interior through the resolved mesoscale and submesoscale fields in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° simulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.111"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. However, the spatial pattern in near inertial SHKE reduction does not straightforwardly support this view, since the reduction is not systematically concentrated in the most energetic regions of the domain (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>d), where mesoscale activity is strongest, but rather appears in the basin interior.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Vertical resolution</title>
      <p id="d2e4064">NEATL12-T-HVR and NEATL12-T differ only in vertical resolution (96 and 32 isopycnal layers, respectively). The zonally averaged rotary spectra (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a–b) show no clear differences in total SHKE, tidal peaks or harmonics. However, the normalized ratio indicates slightly more energy in the northern high latitudes with more vertical levels and less energy in the low latitudes. As seen in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>, increasing the vertical resolution from 32 to 96 levels results in approximately a 10 % to 15 % increase in total SHKE, with the increase being higher over the continental shelf. Because the fraction of total SHKE in each band is largely unchanged (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>), this additional energy is distributed broadly across the frequency domain. The most remarkable difference seen here is that, by increasing the vertical resolution, around 2 % less of the total SHKE is stored in the near-inertial frequencies over the continental shelf.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e4075">Comparison of NEATL12-T-HVR (first column) and NEATL12-T (second column), with a normalized ratio obtained by dividing the first column by the sum of the first and second columns (third column); a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates equal energies. The first row <bold>(a–c)</bold> shows the zonally averaged rotary spectra in 1°  latitude bins computed over the offshore domain (waters deeper than 500 m) in the NEATL domain; note the decimal logarithmic color scale for panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>. The subsequent rows show maps of surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) components over the NEATL domain: low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd; second row <bold>(d–f)</bold>); diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd; third row <bold>(g–i)</bold>); semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd; fourth row <bold>(j–l)</bold>); and near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd restricted poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude; fifth row <bold>(m–o)</bold>). Note the decimal logarithmic color scale for all map panels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4178">The maps in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> confirm the domain-averaged picture. Surface kinetic energy increases slightly across most regions and frequency bands when vertical resolution is refined, with no strong spatial pattern. The main exception lies offshore north of 40° N, where the increase appears spatially uniform in the diurnal band. This signal reflects the general increase of the total SHKE, which stands out visually in this otherwise low-energy region, rather than a diurnal-specific enhancement. Another exception regards regions of intense mesoscale activity, with elevated low-frequency energy in the corridors of North Brazil Current rings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.112"/>, Gulf of Mexico Loop Current eddies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.113"/>, and  Gulf Stream meanders/rings, largely masked by the high background energy in the ratio panel (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>f), but evident when comparing the pathways in panels (d) and (e).</p>
      <p id="d2e4192">Overall, vertical refinement increases the total SHKE, distributed broadly across the frequency domain (see also Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>), with a coherent enhancement at high latitudes. This is consistent with various studies that show that tidal energetics vary with the number of vertical layers provided that horizontal grid spacing is not the limiting factor. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.114"/> showed that the modeled internal wave frequency spectra are improved with increased vertical resolution only when the horizontal resolution is also increased. In an idealized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° HYCOM configuration forced solely by semidiurnal tides, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.115"/> found that increasing the number of isopycnal layers increases tidal-induced vertical velocities and available potential energy, while tidal kinetic energy remains largely unchanged. The energetics increase up to 48 layers and change little thereafter. Here, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° horizontal grid-spacing, the tidal SHKE changes only weakly between 32 and 96 layers, and the tidal SHKE fraction even decreases slightly, suggesting that the horizontal grid-spacing is the limiting factor in our configuration. The dominant effect of vertical refinement is therefore an increase of low-frequency SHKE, also visible in total KE (not shown), in the already energetic meso- and large-scale flow regions, consistent with the primary role of the vertical grid in resolving horizontal flows via improved representation of their baroclinic structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.116"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Impact of internal wave drag</title>
      <p id="d2e4240">NEATL50-T-WD and NEATL50-T differ only in the inclusion of internal wave drag <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.117"/> in NEATL50-T-WD. The zonally averaged rotary spectra (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>) show that the inclusion of wave drag reduces energy across the majority of the frequency domain. The reduction is less pronounced at frequencies below the near-inertial band, where it becomes almost negligible. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> confirms that the inclusion of wave drag leads to a slight decrease in energy across all the frequency bands analyzed. The most pronounced impact is in the semidiurnal band, where the fraction of total SHKE drops by about 0.4 %–0.5 % both inshore (from 43.4 % to 42.9 %) and offshore (from 2.0 % to 1.6 %). While this represents a small relative change inshore, offshore it corresponds to a relative reduction of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4264">Comparison of NEATL50-T-WD (first column) and NEATL50-T (second column), with a normalized ratio obtained by dividing the first column by the sum of the first and second columns (third column); a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates equal energies. The first row <bold>(a–c)</bold> shows the zonally averaged rotary spectra in 1°  latitude bins computed over the offshore domain (waters deeper than 500 m) in the NEATL domain; note the decimal logarithmic color scale for panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>. The subsequent rows show maps of surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) components over the NEATL domain: low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd; second row <bold>(d–f)</bold>); diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd; third row <bold>(g–i)</bold>); semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd; fourth row <bold>(j–l)</bold>); and near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd restricted poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude; fifth row <bold>(m–o)</bold>). Note the decimal logarithmic color scale for all map panels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f08.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4367">The SHKE maps (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>) confirm that incorporating wave drag leads to an overall reduction in surface SHKE across the frequency bands studied. In the low-frequency band, a clear reduction is visible in the tropical band equatorward of around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15° (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>d–f). In the diurnal band, the reduction is most apparent equatorward of 30° N, while no clear signal emerges poleward of this latitude. In contrast, the decline in semidiurnal energy is more pronounced in the deep ocean at nearly all latitudes, with the exception of the western boundary current pathway from the Gulf of Mexico into the Gulf Stream (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>j–l). Finally, in the near-inertial band, no clear signal emerges.</p>
      <p id="d2e4384">Overall, the inclusion of wave drag reduces the energy in each frequency band over the latitudes where the corresponding motions can propagate, that is, equatorward of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15° for the low-frequency band (below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30° for the diurnal band, and across nearly the entire domain for the semidiurnal band, except along the western boundary current pathway. By construction, wave drag dissipates propagating tides, which explains the absence of a clear difference poleward of these critical latitudes, where the motions become evanescent. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.118"/> reported that the MITgcm tends to overestimate semidiurnal SHKE compared to surface drifters and, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.119"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.120"/>, attributed this bias partly to the absence of topographic internal wave drag in the MITgcm simulations. Our results support this interpretation, with lower semidiurnal energy when wave drag is included.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <label>5.5</label><title>Bathymetry resolution</title>
      <p id="d2e4426">NEATL50-T-HB and NEATL50-T differ only in bathymetric resolution, with NEATL50-T-HB using a native <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° bathymetry rather than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° product interpolated onto the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° grid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.121"/>. Overall, the higher-resolution bathymetry reduces the SHKE across most of the frequency domain (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>a–c and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). There are, however, notable exceptions in the semidiurnal and higher-frequency tidal peaks and in the latitudinal band between 20° N and 30° N, where the SHKE is higher in the high-resolution bathymetry simulation. The low-frequency fraction of SHKE is only marginally reduced (from 92.2 % to 91.4 %), whereas in shallow regions it drops more noticeably, from 49.7 % to 45.0 % (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). There are minimal changes in the diurnal and near-inertial components, but enhancing the bathymetry resolution leads to increased energy in the semidiurnal frequency band. The percentage of KE contained in the semidiurnal band increased from 43.4 % to 48.0 % in the shelf domain, and from 2.0 % to 2.5 % in the offshore domain when high-resolution bathymetry was used.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e4477">Comparison of NEATL50-T-HB (first column) and NEATL50-T (second column), with a normalized ratio obtained by dividing the first column by the sum of the first and second columns (third column); a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates equal energies. The first row <bold>(a–c)</bold> shows the zonally averaged rotary spectra in 1°  latitude bins computed over the offshore domain (waters deeper than 500 m) in the NEATL domain; note the decimal logarithmic color scale for panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>. The subsequent rows show maps of surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) components over the NEATL domain: low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd; second row <bold>(d–f)</bold>); diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd; third row <bold>(g–i)</bold>); semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd; fourth row <bold>(j–l)</bold>); and near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd restricted poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude; fifth row <bold>(m–o)</bold>). Note the decimal logarithmic color scale for all map panels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f09.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4580">The SHKE maps (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>) do not show clear regional differences in the low-frequency and near-inertial bands. A noteworthy exception is the enhancement (diminution) of low-frequency SHKE below (above) the equator off the the Amazon shelf (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>f). In the diurnal frequency bandWith, there is a reduction of energy in the higher-resolution bathymetry experiment, with the exception of the 30° N latitude and a few specific regions such as the Adriatic Sea. By contrast, in the semidiurnal band, the increase in bathymetry resolution increases the surface SHKE, with a few exceptions, mainly at high latitudes. There is also a clear increase in the SHKE associated with semidiurnal internal tides in the Amazon shelf.</p>
      <p id="d2e4588">The reduction in the total SHKE of NEATL50-T-HB when compared to NEATL50-T is consistent with the enhanced lateral and bottom  dissipation due to the increase in bathymetric resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.122"/>, both of which are more accurately represented in the finer bathymetric resolution. This reduction is achieved through a transfer of energy toward higher-frequency motions via flow–topography interactions and internal wave generation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.123"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. This mechanism is consistent with the observed reduction of low-frequency SHKE, which occurs in both subdomains, but it is much more pronounced on the continental shelf than in the deep ocean, likely reflecting the enhanced coupling between surface and bottom processes in shallow waters, where the bottom is closer to the surface and more directly shapes the surface kinetic energy. However, changes are spatially heterogeneous, with local increases and decreases in low-frequency energy, in agreement with bathymetry-induced modifications of the large-scale circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.124"/> as, for example, on the Amazon shelf near the North Brazil Current retroflection. In the semidiurnal band, there is an energy increase almost everywhere and we surmise this is due to a better representation of local internal wave generation with better-resolved bathymetry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.125"/>. This is supported by the more pronounced signature observed over the Amazon shelf (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>i), consistent with the strong M<sub>2</sub> barotropic-to-baroclinic conversion documented in that region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx84" id="paren.126"/>. In contrast, the higher bathymetry resolution tends to reduce the diurnal energy, especially equatorward of its critical latitude, possibly reflecting enhanced dissipation of propagating internal waves.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS6">
  <label>5.6</label><title>Temporal frequency of atmospheric forcing</title>
      <p id="d2e4628">NEATL50-T-HB-HF and NEATL50-T-HB differ only in the temporal frequency of the wind forcing, with NEATL50-T-HB-HF using hourly wind stress rather than 6-hourly. Increasing the wind-forcing frequency leads to a rise in SHKE across all frequency bands (Table S1 in the Supplement). However, this does not necessarily imply an increase in all bands when when expressed as fractions of total SHKE (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). For example, there is a reduced percentage in the low frequencies in the offshore domain (86.7 % instead of 91.4 %) while it remains comparable inshore (44.8 % instead of 45.0 %) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). The near-inertial band on the shelf shows almost no net change in total SHKE (Table S1 in the Supplement), because the overall increase of total SHKE is compensated by a reduction in the near-inertial fraction at higher temporal frequency (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). At high frequencies, the energy in the diurnal band (offshore and inshore) and in the offshore near-inertial band shows a large increase, by more than 50 %. This is also visible in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a–c where zonally averaged rotary spectra are compared. We find that an increase in wind frequency increases the energy in nearly all the frequency domains at all latitudes, with the exception of low and semidiurnal frequency motions where the level of energy is comparable. Spatially, the increase in energy for higher wind frequency is mostly uniform for the low frequency, diurnal and near-inertial frequency bands (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>). However, in the semidiurnal frequency band, the increase is only confined to specific regions, e.g, the Gulf of Mexico, Mediterranean Sea, Baltic Sea, Norwegian Sea and Greenland Sea.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e4643">Comparison of NEATL50-T-HB-HF (first column) and NEATL50-T-HB (second column), with a normalized ratio obtained by dividing the first column by the sum of the first and second columns (third column); a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates equal energies. The first row <bold>(a–c)</bold> shows the zonally averaged rotary spectra in 1°  latitude bins computed over the offshore domain (waters deeper than 500 m) in the NEATL domain; note the decimal logarithmic color scale for panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>. The subsequent rows show maps of surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) components over the NEATL domain: low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd; second row <bold>(d–f)</bold>); diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd; third row <bold>(g–i)</bold>); semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd; fourth row <bold>(j–l)</bold>); and near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd restricted poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude; fifth row <bold>(m–o)</bold>). Note the decimal logarithmic color scale for all map panels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f10.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4746">Overall, the increase in wind forcing frequency raises the total SHKE across most of the domain through a gain of high-frequency energy. A strong amplification occurs in the near-inertial band, consistent with the known role of the wind in driving near-inertial motions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.127"/>. As noted by several authors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.128"/>, this near-inertial response is less pronounced in tropical and subtropical regions than at mid-latitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>o). A more unexpected feature is the strong amplification in the diurnal band almost everywhere and in the semidiurnal band in regions of weak semidiurnal energy such as semi-enclosed basins. This behavior likely reflects the diurnal and semidiurnal cycles of the wind itself <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.129"/>. In particular, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.130"/> estimated globally that the diurnal cycle accounts for 30 %–40 % of the daily wind variance over the ocean, whereas the semidiurnal cycle accounts for only 15 %–25 %. The dominant diurnal share explains why the wind-forced signal covers most of the domain in the diurnal band. The semidiurnal share, by contrast, is small enough that the directly wind-forced response can only emerge clearly where the background astronomical semidiurnal tide is itself weak, which is precisely the case in the semi-enclosed basins where we observe the amplification in the ratio maps. Consistently, no such amplification appears in regions known for resonant astronomical semidiurnal tides, such as the North Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.131"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, the English Channel and Irish Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.132"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, Hudson Bay <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.133"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, and the Bay of Fundy–Gulf of Maine system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.134"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, where the strong astronomical signal is expected to mask the wind-forced response. Note that the diurnal amplification appears weaker near 30° in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>i.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e4795">The experimental suite analyzed in the previous section allows us to attribute changes in total surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) and its frequency distribution to individual numerical choices (grid and bathymetry resolution, wind and tidal forcing, and wave drag). In this section, we discuss the parameters that most strongly affect the SHKE distribution in each frequency band and, where applicable, how they could be adjusted to reduce the model-drifter gap. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/> synthesizes, for each of the six sensitivity experiments, the relative change in total and per-band SHKE for the offshore (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) and continental-shelf (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) regions. This forms the backbone of the discussion that follows where each of the next paragraphs focuses on one frequency band.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e4822">Sensitivity of the domain-averaged surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) to six model configuration choices, separately for the offshore (waters deeper than 500 m; filled bars, solid edges) and continental shelf (waters shallower than 500 m; lighter bars, dashed edges) subdomains of the NEATL region. Each panel shows the relative change in SHKE, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SHKE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mod</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SHKE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ctrl</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SHKE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ctrl</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in %), induced by a single parameter modification, decomposed into five components: total SHKE (grey), low-frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 cpd, blue), diurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1] cpd, green), semidiurnal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[1.9, 2.1] cpd, orange), and near-inertial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[0.9, 1.1]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cpd restricted poleward of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude, red). The six parameter pairs (control to modified) are: <bold>(a)</bold> horizontal resolution, NEATL12-T to NEATL50-T; <bold>(b)</bold> vertical resolution, NEATL12-T to NEATL12-T-HVR; <bold>(c)</bold> number of tidal constituents, NEATL12-M<sub>2</sub> to NEATL12-T; <bold>(d)</bold> inclusion of internal wave drag, NEATL50-T to NEATL50-T-WD; <bold>(e)</bold> bathymetry resolution, NEATL50-T to NEATL50-T-HB; <bold>(f)</bold> atmospheric forcing temporal frequency, NEATL50-T-HB to NEATL50-T-HB-HF. The vertical axis is clipped at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 % for readability; values outside this range are reported numerically above (positive) or below (negative) the corresponding bar.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/5571/2026/gmd-19-5571-2026-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e4955">The total SHKE (grey in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>) is most sensitive to horizontal resolution in the offshore region, where refining the horizontal grid from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases the offshore SHKE by about one third (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31 %, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a). The increase in horizontal resolution is also the parameter that fills the most the high-frequency continuum between the tidal peaks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.135"/> by resolving smaller-scale wave modes that feed the continuum through nonlinear wave–wave interactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.136"/>. All simulations nevertheless underestimate this continuum relative to drifters, a mismatch that cannot be explained by the Eulerian-Lagrangian distinction and likely reflects both incomplete wave–wave interaction cascades in the models and a contribution of drifter positioning errors to the observed high-frequency variance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="paren.137"/>. Vertical resolution raises the total SHKE by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % offshore and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 % on the shelf (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>b), reflecting better-resolved horizontal flows via improved representation of their baroclinic structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.138"/>. This makes vertical resolution the parameter that generate the highest increase on the total shelf SHKE, ahead of horizontal resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 %, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a).  Higher-resolution bathymetry is the only parameter that reduces the total SHKE, and it does so on both subdomains (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>7 % offshore and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>6 % on the shelf, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>e), because finer bathymetry both enhances lateral and bottom  dissipation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.139"/> and reshapes the large-scale circulation through better-resolved bathymetric gradients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.140"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5058">Low frequencies (blue in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>) dominate the offshore SHKE in both the simulations (83 %–93 %) and the undrogued drifters (64 %–78 %), consistent with large- and mesoscale motions carrying most of the oceanic kinetic energy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.141"/>. The smaller low-frequency fraction in the drifters reflects the richer high-frequency content of their trajectories, at least partly attributable to measurement artifacts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.142"/> and wind slippage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.143"/>, rather than a deficit of absolute low-frequency energy. In absolute terms, NEATL50-T-HB-HF concentrates more low-frequency SHKE than the drifters in strong low-frequency motions, while the drifters carry more low-frequency SHKE than the simulations in the weakly energetic basin interiors. We cannot explain these contrasts with our current model set-ups. Three parameters still carry a distinctive signature. Finer horizontal resolution strongly increases the low-frequency SHKE (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32 % offshore and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 % on the shelf Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a). Hourly wind forcing drops the offshore low-frequency fraction from 91.4 % to 86.7 %, the only run below 90 %, through the same ratio effect as the drifter comparison, since the higher-frequency wind variability feeds the higher frequency continuum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.144"/> while leaving the absolute offshore low-frequency SHKE nearly unchanged (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>f). Higher-resolution bathymetry reduces the low-frequency SHKE on both subdomains, more strongly on the shelf, likely reflecting the surface signature of an enhanced transfer of energy toward higher-frequency motions through flow–topography interactions and internal wave generation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.145"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Combined with the effect of finer bathymetry reduction of the total SHKE noted above, this suggests that at least part of the low-frequency energy removed from the surface is ultimately dissipated rather than transferred to higher frequencies.</p>
      <p id="d2e5106">NEATL50-T-HB-HF overestimates the observed drifter diurnal SHKE (green in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>)  equatorward of diurnal critical latitude (i.e., 30° N) and underestimates it poleward. Three parameters dominate this band in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>. Hourly wind forcing more than doubles the offshore diurnal SHKE (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>131 %, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>f) with a nearly uniform spatial pattern, consistent with the diurnal cycle of the wind <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.146"/>. Expanding the tidal forcing from M<sub>2</sub> only to the eight largest constituents more than triples the diurnal SHKE on the shelf (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>233 %, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>c), where the barotropic tidal currents are strongest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.147"/>, while leaving the offshore signal poleward of 30° N  nearly unchanged. Internal wave drag is absent following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.148"/>, who adopted the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.149"/> approach of tuning wave drag to fit observed tides and found that a zero drag scale minimizes the barotropic M<sub>2</sub> RMS error in NEATL tidal configuration. When reintroduced in NEATL50-T-WD, internal wave drag <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.150"/> acts on the diurnal band only equatorward of the diurnal critical latitude (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>d), consistent with its selective action on propagating internal tides. The poleward deficit in NEATL50-T-HB-HF diurnal SHKE is non-tidal, and among our tested parameters only increased wind forcing frequency acts on this signal. In contrast, the equatorward excess is of tidal origin, and the inclusion of a weak topographic wave drag as discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.151"/> stands out as a concrete and testable path to bring the simulated diurnal SHKE closer to the drifter observations equatorward of 30° N.</p>
      <p id="d2e5171">In the semidiurnal band (orange in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>), the distortion introduced by the Lagrangian sampling is the largest (Sect. 4) and prevents the use of the drifters as reference. Three parameters dominate this band in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>. Higher-resolution bathymetry raises the semidiurnal SHKE on both subdomains despite reducing the total SHKE (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>e), consistent with stronger barotropic-to-baroclinic conversion at a better-resolved shelf-break topography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.152"/>, particularly clear for the well-known Amazon source of semidiurnal internal tides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx84" id="paren.153"/>. Finer horizontal resolution reduces the shelf semidiurnal fraction by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>3 % (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a), a change that seems small but is meaningful relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 % shelf total increase, indicating enhanced shelf-break conversion that feeds internal tides radiating seaward, consistent with the predominantly barotropic nature of the shelf semidiurnal tide and with the dissipation of a large share of the global M<sub>2</sub> energy over continental shelves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.154"/>. The corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 % offshore increase is large in relative terms but represents only an absolute shift from 1.9 % to 2.0 % of the total SHKE. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.155"/> also suggested that insufficient horizontal resolution could enhance the semidiurnal peak by inhibiting scattering into the wave continuum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.156"/>. This mechanism could additionally contribute to the shelf semidiurnal reduction, but raises the question of why a comparable reduction is not apparent in the deep ocean. Internal wave drag cuts the offshore semidiurnal SHKE by about one quarter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>27 %) while barely affecting the total (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>d), in line with the interpretation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.157"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.158"/> that the semidiurnal excess in tide-forced models reflects in part the absence of such a drag. This reduction is spatially concentrated away from the Gulf of Mexico-Gulf Stream pathway, suggesting a weaker imprint of wave drag in regions of strong western boundary currents. The excess in semidiurnal SHKE in OP Seed drifters when compared to measurements is predominantly in the deep ocean, exactly where wave drag preferentially acts. As for the diurnal band, adding a weak topographic wave drag may bring the simulated semidiurnal SHKE closer to the drifter observations, damping the model excess in the deep ocean without altering the western boundary current signal.</p>
      <p id="d2e5244">Finally, in  the near-inertial band (red in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>) , the drifters carry more SHKE than NEATL50-T-HB-HF over the same regions of strong low-frequency motions as in the semidiurnal band as well as near the low-latitude equatorial edge of the band.  Two parameters dominate this band in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>. Hourly wind forcing nearly doubles the offshore near-inertial fraction (from 4.5 % to 7.6 %, corresponding to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>80 % absolute increase, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>f), and produces a more modest rise on the shelf, consistent with winds being a major source of near-inertial motions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.159"/>. As noted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.160"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.161"/>, this increase is less pronounced in tropical and subtropical regions than at mid-latitudes. Finer horizontal resolution acts in the opposite direction. Although the absolute near-inertial SHKE rises along with the overall SHKE increase, the fraction of total SHKE stored in this band drops (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a) both offshore (from 6.1 % of total SHKE to 4.2 %) and on the shelf (from 20.3 % of total SHKE to 18 %). A natural interpretation would invoke a more efficient vertical transport of near-inertial kinetic energy into the ocean interior through the better-resolved mesoscale and submesoscale fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.162"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. However, the spatial pattern does not straightforwardly support this view, since the reduction is not systematically concentrated in the most energetic regions of the domain but rather appears in the basin interior, leaving the origin of this near-inertial deficit at higher resolution as an open question.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5285">In conclusion, this study used six pairwise twin experiments, each isolating a single numerical choice, to quantify how individual model parameters shape the surface horizontal kinetic energy (SHKE) distribution in the North and Equatorial Atlantic. Earlier comparisons of SHKE in tide-resolving models to drifter observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.163"/> have raised a number of hypotheses on the role of individual parameters in shaping the SHKE distribution, but these hypotheses could not be directly tested because the model pairs they compared differed in several parameters simultaneously. Our twin-experiment design addresses this limitation by changing only one parameter at a time across a dedicated suite of tide-resolving, eddy-resolving to submesoscale-permitting simulations. Although several questions remain open, the design has made it possible to carry out a parameter-by-parameter assessment of the SHKE distribution within a unified diagnostic framework and frequency decomposition, providing a by-band, by-subdomain view of the individual effects of each parameter on the SHKE. This sensitivity picture should be of practical use to anyone designing a future tide-resolving numerical simulation. For the HYCOM NEATL configuration, the natural next step would be to test the inclusion of a topographic internal wave drag in NEATL50-T-HB-HF, which should reduce the tidal-band SHKE excess relative to the drifters equatorward of the respective critical latitudes. The twin-experiment framework could also be extended toward parameters still left untested here, with a particular focus on the mechanisms able to amplify the non-tidal variability away from the low-frequency motions. Two natural candidates are the lateral viscosity and the wind stress formulation, both recently shown to substantially modulate the Gulf Stream pathway and variability in a non-tidal NEATL50 simulation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.164"/>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5298">The HYCOM 2.3.01 source code is available at <uri>https://github.com/HYCOM/HYCOM-src/tree/2.3.01</uri> and is archived at SEANOE (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17882/111296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17882/111296</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="altparen.165"/>). The full-resolution HYCOM model outputs are stored in the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) and U.S. Navy DoD Supercomputing Resource Center (DSRC) archive servers and are available on request. The Parcels Python package used in this study (v2.3.2) is archived on Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7035503</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="altparen.166"/>). Version 2.01 of the hourly Global Drifter Program dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.167"/> was downloaded on 30 April 2025, and an archived copy of the subset used in this study is available at SEANOE (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17882/111296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17882/111296</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="altparen.168"/>). The gridded 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° rotary surface velocity spectra and derived kinetic energy diagnostics (total, low-frequency, diurnal, semidiurnal, and near-inertial) for the seven HYCOM NEATL simulations, the OceanParcels experiments, and the four drifter datasets (drogued or undrogued; all positions or GPS only), together with an M-language script to reproduce the figures of this paper (compatible with both MATLAB and GNU Octave), are archived at SEANOE (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17882/111296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17882/111296</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="altparen.169"/>). Beyond reproducing the figures, the interested reader can zoom into specific regions or frequency bands of the sensitivity results, and can also step outside the strict single-parameter design adopted here by combining pairs of experiments to probe the joint effect of two parameters at once.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5344">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5571-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5571-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5353">RL, EC, MB, and BA conceived and proposed the idea for this study. XX ran the numerical simulations and the OceanParcels Experiments. RL did the analysis. RL and EC wrote the first draft of the manuscripts. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5359">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5365">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5372">The authors acknowledge support from the funding agencies listed in the Financial Support section. The seven HYCOM simulations were performed on supercomputers at the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) in Vicksburg, Mississippi, and the US Navy DoD Super-computing Resource Center (DSRC) in Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, using computer time provided by the US DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5377">This research has been supported by the Office of Naval Research, Office of Naval Research Global (grant nos. N00014-19-1-2712, N00014-19-1-2704, and N00014-19-1-2717) and the National Science Foundation, Directorate for Geosciences (grant nos. OCE-2242111 and OCE-1851166).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5383">This paper was edited by Johannes Lohmann and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Abdalla et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Abdalla, S., Abdeh Kolahchi, A., Ablain, M., Adusumilli, S., Aich Bhowmick, S., Alou-Font, E., Amarouche, L., Andersen, O. B., Antich, H., Aouf, L., Arbic, B., Armitage, T., Arnault, S., Artana, C., Aulicino, G., Ayoub, N., Badulin, S., Baker, S., Banks, C., Bao, L., Barbetta, S., Barceló-Llull, B., Barlier, F., Basu, S., Bauer-Gottwein, P., Becker, M., Beckley, B., Bellefond, N., Belonenko, T., Benkiran, M., Benkouider, T., Bennartz, R., Benveniste, J., Bercher, N., Berge-Nguyen, M., Bettencourt, J., Blarel, F., Blazquez, A., Blumstein, D., Bonnefond, P., Borde, F., Bouffard, J., Boy, F., Boy, J.-P., Brachet, C., Brasseur, P., Braun, A., Brocca, L., Brockley, D., Brodeau, L., Brown, S., Bruinsma, S., Bulczak, A., Buzzard, S., Cahill, M., Calmant, S., Calzas, M., Camici, S., Cancet, M., Capdeville, H., Carabajal, C. C., Carrere, L., Cazenave, A., Chassignet, E. P., Chauhan, P., Cherchali, S., Chereskin, T., Cheymol, C., Ciani, D., Cipollini, P., Cirillo, F., Cosme, E., Coss, S., Cotroneo, Y., Cotton, D., Couhert, A., Coutin-Faye, S., Crétaux, J.-F., Cyr, F., d'Ovidio, F., Darrozes, J., David, C., Dayoub, N., De Staerke, D., Deng, X., Desai, S., Desjonqueres, J.-D., Dettmering, D., Di Bella, A., Díaz-Barroso, L., Dibarboure, G., Dieng, H. B., Dinardo, S., Dobslaw, H., Dodet, G., Doglioli, A., Domeneghetti, A., Donahue, D., Dong, S., Donlon, C., Dorandeu, J., Drezen, C., Drinkwater, M., Du Penhoat, Y., Dushaw, B., Egido, A., Erofeeva, S., Escudier, P., Esselborn, S., Exertier, P., Fablet, R., Falco, C., Farrell, S. L., Faugere, Y., Femenias, P., Fenoglio, L., Fernandes, J., Fernández, J. G., Ferrage, P., Ferrari, R., Fichen, L., Filippucci, P., Flampouris, S., Fleury, S., Fornari, M., Forsberg, R., Frappart, F., Frery, M.-L., Garcia, P., Garcia-Mondejar, A., Gaudelli, J., Gaultier, L., Getirana, A., Gibert, F., Gil, A., Gilbert, L., Gille, S., Giulicchi, L., Gómez-Enri, J., Gómez-Navarro, L., Gommenginger, C., Gourdeau, L., Griffin, D., Groh, A., Guerin, A., Guerrero, R., Guinle, T., Gupta, P., Gutknecht, B. D., Hamon, M., Han, G., Hauser, D., Helm, V., Hendricks, S., Hernandez, F., Hogg, A., Horwath, M., Idžanović, M., Janssen, P., Jeansou, E., Jia, Y., Jia, Y., Jiang, L., Johannessen, J. A., Kamachi, M., Karimova, S., Kelly, K., Kim, S. Y., King, R., Kittel, C. M. M., Klein, P., Klos, A., Knudsen, P., Koenig, R., Kostianoy, A., Kouraev, A., Kumar, R., Labroue, S., Lago, L. S., Lambin, J., Lasson, L., Laurain, O., Laxenaire, R., Lázaro, C., Le Gac, S., Le Sommer, J., Le Traon, P.-Y., Lebedev, S., Léger, F., Legresy, B., Lemoine, F., Lenain, L., Leuliette, E., Levy, M., Lillibridge, J., Liu, J., Llovel, W., Lyard, F., Macintosh, C., Makhoul Varona, E., Manfredi, C., Marin, F., Mason, E., Massari, C., Mavrocordatos, C., Maximenko, N., McMillan, M., Medina, T., Melet, A., Meloni, M., Mertikas, S., Metref, S., Meyssignac, B., Minster, J.-F., Moreau, T., Moreira, D., Morel, Y., Morrow, R., Moyard, J., Mulet, S., Naeije, M., Nerem, R. S., Ngodock, H., Nielsen, K., Nilsen, J. E. Ø., Niño, F., Nogueira Loddo, C., Noûs, C., Obligis, E., Otosaka, I., Otten, M., Oztunali Ozbahceci, B., P. Raj, R., Paiva, R., Paniagua, G., Paolo, F., Paris, A., Pascual, A., Passaro, M., Paul, S., Pavelsky, T., Pearson, C., Penduff, T., Peng, F., Perosanz, F., Picot, N., Piras, F., Poggiali, V., Poirier, É., Ponce de León, S., Prants, S., Prigent, C., Provost, C., Pujol, M.-I., Qiu, B., Quilfen, Y., Rami, A., Raney, R. K., Raynal, M., Remy, E., Rémy, F., Restano, M., Richardson, A., Richardson, D., Ricker, R., Ricko, M., Rinne, E., Rose, S. K., Rosmorduc, V., Rudenko, S., Ruiz, S., Ryan, B. J., Salaün, C., Sanchez-Roman, A., Sandberg Sørensen, L., Sandwell, D., Saraceno, M., Scagliola, M., Schaeffer, P., Scharffenberg, M. G., Scharroo, R., Schiller, A., Schneider, R., Schwatke, C., Scozzari, A., Ser-giacomi, E., Seyler, F., Shah, R., Sharma, R., Shaw, A., Shepherd, A., Shriver, J., Shum, C. K., Simons, W., Simonsen, S. B., Slater, T., Smith, W., Soares, S., Sokolovskiy, M., Soudarin, L., Spatar, C., Speich, S., Srinivasan, M., Srokosz, M., Stanev, E., Staneva, J., Steunou, N., Stroeve, J., Su, B., Sulistioadi, Y. B., Swain, D., Sylvestre-baron, A., Taburet, N., Tailleux, R., Takayama, K., Tapley, B., Tarpanelli, A., Tavernier, G., Testut, L., Thakur, P. K., Thibaut, P., Thompson, L., Tintoré, J., Tison, C., Tourain, C., Tournadre, J., Townsend, B., Tran, N., Trilles, S., Tsamados, M., Tseng, K.-H., Ubelmann, C., Uebbing, B., Vergara, O., Verron, J., Vieira, T., Vignudelli, S., Vinogradova Shiffer, N., Visser, P., Vivier, F., Volkov, D., von Schuckmann, K., Vuglinskii, V., Vuilleumier, P., Walter, B., Wang, J., Wang, C., Watson, C., Wilkin, J., Willis, J., Wilson, H., Woodworth, P., Yang, K., Yao, F., Zaharia, R., Zakharova, E., Zaron, E. D., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., Zinchenko, V., and Zlotnicki, V.: Altimetry for the future: Building on 25 years of progress, Adv. Space Res., 68, 319–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.022</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Ajayi et al.(2020)Ajayi, Le Sommer, Chassignet, Molines, Xu, Albert, and Cosme</label><mixed-citation>Ajayi, A., Le Sommer, J., Chassignet, E., Molines, J.-M., Xu, X., Albert, A., and Cosme, E.: Spatial and Temporal Variability of the North Atlantic Eddy Field From Two Kilometric-Resolution Ocean Models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JC015827</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Ajayi et al.(2021)Ajayi, Le Sommer, Chassignet, Molines, Xu, Albert, and Dewar</label><mixed-citation>Ajayi, A., Le Sommer, J., Chassignet, E. P., Molines, J.-M., Xu, X., Albert, A., and Dewar, W.: Diagnosing Cross-Scale Kinetic Energy Exchanges From Two Submesoscale Permitting Ocean Models, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2019MS001923, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001923" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001923</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Amante and Eakins(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Amante, C. and Eakins, B.: ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: procedures, data sources and analysis, NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24, National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7289/V5C8276M" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7289/V5C8276M</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Ansong et al.(2015)Ansong, Arbic, Buijsman, Richman, Shriver, and Wallcraft</label><mixed-citation>Ansong, J. K., Arbic, B. K., Buijsman, M. C., Richman, J. G., Shriver, J. F., and Wallcraft, A. J.: Indirect evidence for substantial damping of low-mode internal tides in the open ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 6057–6071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010998" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JC010998</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Arbic(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Arbic, B. K.: Incorporating tides and internal gravity waves within global ocean general circulation models: A review, Prog. Oceanogr., 206, 102824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102824" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102824</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Arbic et al.(2010)Arbic, Wallcraft, and Metzger</label><mixed-citation>Arbic, B. K., Wallcraft, A. J., and Metzger, E. J.: Concurrent simulation of the eddying general circulation and tides in a global ocean model, Ocean Model., 32, 175–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2010.01.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2010.01.007</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Arbic et al.(2012)Arbic, Richman, Shriver, Timko, Metzger, and Wallcraft</label><mixed-citation>Arbic, B. K., Richman, J. G., Shriver, J. F., Timko, P. G., Metzger, E. J., and Wallcraft, A. J.: Global modeling of internal tides: Within an eddying ocean general circulation model, Oceanography, 25, 20–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2012.38" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5670/oceanog.2012.38</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Arbic et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Arbic, B. K., Alford, M. H., Ansong, J. K., Buijsman, M. C., Ciotti, R. B., Farrar, J. T., Hallberg, R. W., Henze, C. E., Hill, C. N., Luecke, C. A., Menemenlis, D., Metzger, E. J., Müller, M., Nelson, A. D., Nelson, B. C., Ngodock, H. E., Ponte, R. M., Richman, J. G., Savage, A. C., Scott, R. B., Shriver, J. F., Simmons, H. L., Souopgui, I., Timko, P. G., Wallcraft, A. J., Zamudio, L., and Zhao, Z.: A primer on global internal tide and internal gravity wave continuum modeling in HYCOM and MITgcm, New frontiers in operational oceanography, 307–392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17125/gov2018.ch13</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Arbic et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Arbic, B. K., Elipot, S., Brasch, J. M., Menemenlis, D., Ponte, A. L., Shriver, J. F., Yu, X., Zaron, E. D., Alford, M. H., Buijsman, M. C., Abernathey, R., Garcia, D., Guan, L., Martin, P. E., and Nelson, A. D.:  Near-surface oceanic kinetic energy distributions from drifter observations and numerical models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, e2022JC018551, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JC018551</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Archer et al.(2025)Archer, Wang, Klein, Dibarboure, and Fu</label><mixed-citation>Archer, M., Wang, J., Klein, P., Dibarboure, G., and Fu, L.-L.: Wide-swath satellite altimetry unveils global submesoscale ocean dynamics, Nature, 640, 691–696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08722-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-025-08722-8</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Beardsley et al.(1995)Beardsley, Candela, Limeburner, Geyer, Lentz, Castro, Cacchione, and Carneiro</label><mixed-citation>Beardsley, R. C., Candela, J., Limeburner, R., Geyer, W. R., Lentz, S. J., Castro, B. M., Cacchione, D., and Carneiro, N.: The M2 tide on the Amazon Shelf, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 2283–2319, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01688" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JC01688</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Bleck(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Bleck, R.: An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid isopycnic-Cartesian coordinates, Ocean Model., 4, 55–88, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(01)00012-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1463-5003(01)00012-9</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Buijsman et al.(2015)Buijsman, Arbic, Green, Helber, Richman, Shriver, Timko, and Wallcraft</label><mixed-citation>Buijsman, M. C., Arbic, B. K., Green, J., Helber, R. W., Richman, J. G., Shriver, J. F., Timko, P., and Wallcraft, A.: Optimizing internal wave drag in a forward barotropic model with semidiurnal tides, Ocean Model., 85, 42–55, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.11.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.11.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Buijsman et al.(2020)Buijsman, Stephenson, Ansong, Arbic, Green, Richman, Shriver, Vic, Wallcraft, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>Buijsman, M. C., Stephenson, G. R., Ansong, J. K., Arbic, B. K., Green, J. M., Richman, J. G., Shriver, J. F., Vic, C., Wallcraft, A. J., and Zhao, Z.: On the interplay between horizontal resolution and wave drag and their effect on tidal baroclinic mode waves in realistic global ocean simulations, Ocean Model., 152, 101656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2020.101656" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2020.101656</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Buijsman et al.(2025)Buijsman, Abdulfatai, Arbic, Chassignet, Hiron, Shriver, Solano, Varma, and Xu</label><mixed-citation>Buijsman, M. C., Abdulfatai, M., Arbic, B. K., Chassignet, E. P., Hiron, L., Shriver, J. F., Solano, M., Varma, D., and Xu, X.: Energetics of (Super)Tidal Baroclinic Modes in a Realistically Forced Global Ocean Simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 130, e2025JC022460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JC022460" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025JC022460</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Carnes(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Carnes, M. R.: Description and evaluation of GDEMV 3.0. Naval Rearch Laboratory Memo, Tech. rep., NRL/MR/7330-09-9165, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Caspar-Cohen et al.(2022)Caspar-Cohen, Ponte, Lahaye, Carton, Yu, and Legentil</label><mixed-citation>Caspar-Cohen, Z., Ponte, A., Lahaye, N., Carton, X., Yu, X., and Legentil, S.: Characterization of Internal Tide Incoherence: Eulerian versus Lagrangian Perspectives, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 52, 1245–1259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0088.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-21-0088.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Caspar-Cohen et al.(2025)Caspar-Cohen, Ponte, Lahaye, Zaron, Arbic, Yu, LeGentil, and Menemenlis</label><mixed-citation>Caspar-Cohen, Z., Ponte, A., Lahaye, N., Zaron, E. D., Arbic, B. K., Yu, X., LeGentil, S., and Menemenlis, D.: Combining surface drifters and high resolution global simulations enables the mapping of internal tide surface energy, Sci. Rep., 15, 10672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92662-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-025-92662-w</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Chassignet and Xu(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Chassignet, E. P. and Xu, X.: Impact of horizontal resolution (1/12 to 1/50) on Gulf Stream separation, penetration, and variability, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 47, 1999–2021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0031.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-17-0031.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Chassignet and Xu(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Chassignet, E. P. and Xu, X.: On the importance of high-resolution in large-scale ocean models, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1621–1634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0385-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-021-0385-7</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Chassignet and Xu(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Chassignet, E. P. and Xu, X.: Impact of wind stress formulation on Gulf Stream pathway and variability, Front. Mar. Sci., 12, 1739630, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1739630" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2025.1739630</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Chassignet et al.(2003)Chassignet, Smith, Halliwell, and Bleck</label><mixed-citation>Chassignet, E. P., Smith, L. T., Halliwell, G. R., and Bleck, R.: North Atlantic Simulations with the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM): Impact of the Vertical Coordinate Choice, Reference Pressure, and Thermobaricity, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 2504–2526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033&lt;2504:naswth&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033&lt;2504:naswth&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Chassignet et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Chassignet, E. P., Hurlburt, H. E., Smedstad, O. M., Halliwell, G. R., Wallcraft, A. J., Metzger, E. J., Blanton, B. O., Lozano, C., Rao, D. B., Hogan, P. J., and Srinivasan, A.: Generalized vertical coordinates for eddy-resolving global and coastal ocean forecasts, Oceanography, 19, 118–129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2006.95" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5670/oceanog.2006.95</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Chassignet et al.(2009)Chassignet, Hurlburt, Metzger, Smedstad, Cummings, Halliwell, Bleck, Baraille, Wallcraft, Lozano, Tolman, Srinivasan, Hankin, Cornillon, Weisberg, Barth, He, Werner, and Wilkin</label><mixed-citation>Chassignet, E. P., Hurlburt, H. E., Metzger, E. J., Smedstad, O. M., Cummings, J. A., Halliwell, G. R., Bleck, R., Baraille, R., Wallcraft, A. J., Lozano, C., Tolman, H. L., Srinivasan, A., Hankin, S., Cornillon, P., Weisberg, R., Barth, A., He, R., Werner, F., and Wilkin, J.: US GODAE: Global Ocean Prediction with the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM), Oceanography, 22, 64–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.39" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5670/oceanog.2009.39</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Chassignet et al.(2020)Chassignet, Yeager, Fox-Kemper, Bozec, Castruccio, Danabasoglu, Kim, Koldunov, Li, and Lin</label><mixed-citation>Chassignet, E. P., Yeager, S. G., Fox-Kemper, B., Bozec, A., Castruccio, F., Danabasoglu, G., Horvat, C., Kim, W. M., Koldunov, N., Li, Y., Lin, P., Liu, H., Sein, D. V., Sidorenko, D., Wang, Q., and Xu, X.: Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean–sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4595–4637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Chassignet et al.(2023)Chassignet, Xu, Bozec, and Uchida</label><mixed-citation>Chassignet, E. P., Xu, X., Bozec, A., and Uchida, T.: Impact of the New England seamount chain on Gulf Stream pathway and variability, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 53, 1871–1886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-23-0008.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-23-0008.1</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Cummins et al.(2010)Cummins, Karsten, and Arbic</label><mixed-citation>Cummins, P. F., Karsten, R. H., and Arbic, B. K.: The semi-diurnal tide in Hudson strait as a resonant channel oscillation, Atmosphere-Ocean, 48, 163–176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3137/OC307.2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3137/OC307.2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Dai(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Dai, A.: The diurnal cycle from observations and ERA5 in surface pressure, temperature, humidity, and winds, Clim. Dynam., 61, 2965–2990, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06721-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-023-06721-x</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Dai and Deser(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Dai, A. and Deser, C.: Diurnal and semidiurnal variations in global surface wind and divergence fields, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 31109–31125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900927" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900927</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Davis(1983)</label><mixed-citation> Davis, R.: Oceanic property transport, Lagrangian particle statistics, and their prediction, J. Marine Res., 41, 163–194, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Delandmeter and Van Sebille(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Delandmeter, P. and van Sebille, E.: The Parcels v2.0 Lagrangian framework: new field interpolation schemes, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3571–3584, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3571-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-3571-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>De Marez et al.(2020)De Marez, Lahaye, and Gula</label><mixed-citation>De Marez, C., Lahaye, N. J., and Gula, J.: Interaction of the Gulf Stream with small scale topography: A focus on lee waves, Sci. Rep., 10, 2332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59297-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-59297-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Egbert and Ray(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Egbert, G. D. and Ray, R. D.: Estimates of M2 tidal energy dissipation from TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter data, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 106, 22475–22502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000699" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JC000699</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Elipot and Lumpkin(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Elipot, S. and Lumpkin, R.: Spectral description of oceanic near-surface variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032874" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032874</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Elipot et al.(2016)Elipot, Lumpkin, Perez, Lilly, Early, and Sykulski</label><mixed-citation>Elipot, S., Lumpkin, R., Perez, R. C., Lilly, J. M., Early, J. J., and Sykulski, A. M.: A global surface drifter data set at hourly resolution, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 2937–2966, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011716" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JC011716</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Elipot et al.(2022)Elipot, Sykulski, Lumpkin, Centurioni, and Pazos</label><mixed-citation>Elipot, S., Sykulski, A., Lumpkin, R., Centurioni, L., and Pazos, M.: Hourly location, current velocity, and temperature collected from Global Drifter Program drifters world-wide, Accession, 248584, v1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25921/x46c-3620" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25921/x46c-3620</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Emery and Thomson(2001)</label><mixed-citation> Emery, W. J. and Thomson, R. E.: Data Analysis Methods in Physical Oceanography, 2nd and Revised Edn., Elsevier, ISBN 978-0-444-50756-3, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Ferrari and Wunsch(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Ferrari, R. and Wunsch, C.: Ocean circulation kinetic energy: Reservoirs, sources, and sinks, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102139</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Flexas et al.(2019)Flexas, Thompson, Torres, Klein, Farrar, Zhang, and Menemenlis</label><mixed-citation>Flexas, M. M., Thompson, A. F., Torres, H. S., Klein, P., Farrar, J. T., Zhang, H., and Menemenlis, D.: Global estimates of the energy transfer from the wind to the ocean, with emphasis on near-inertial oscillations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 124, 5723–5746, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JC014453</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Fratantoni and Glickson(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Fratantoni, D. M. and Glickson, D. A.: North Brazil Current ring generation and evolution observed with SeaWiFS, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 1058–1074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;1058:NBCRGA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;1058:NBCRGA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Fu et al.(2024)Fu, Pavelsky, Cretaux, Morrow, Farrar, Vaze, Sengenes, Vinogradova-Shiffer, Sylvestre-Baron, Picot, and Dibarboure</label><mixed-citation>Fu, L.-L., Pavelsky, T., Cretaux, J.-F., Morrow, R., Farrar, J. T., Vaze, P., Sengenes, P., Vinogradova-Shiffer, N., Sylvestre-Baron, A., Picot, N., and Dibarboure, G.: The Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission: A Breakthrough in Radar Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Land Surface Water, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107652, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL107652</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Furevik and Foldvik(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Furevik, T. and Foldvik, A.: Stability at M2 critical latitude in the Barents Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 101, 8823–8837, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC00081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JC00081</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Gabioux et al.(2005)Gabioux, Vinzon, and Paiva</label><mixed-citation>Gabioux, M., Vinzon, S. B., and Paiva, A. M.: Tidal propagation over fluid mud layers on the Amazon shelf, Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 113–125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.09.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2004.09.001</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Garrett(1972)</label><mixed-citation>Garrett, C.: Tidal resonance in the Bay of Fundy and Gulf of Maine, Nature, 238, 441–443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/238441a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/238441a0</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Garrett and Munk(1975)</label><mixed-citation>Garrett, C. and Munk, W.: Space-time scales of internal waves: A progress report, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 291–297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC080i003p00291" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC080i003p00291</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>GEBCO Bathymetric Compilation Group 2019(2019)</label><mixed-citation>GEBCO Bathymetric Compilation Group 2019: The GEBCO_2019 Grid – a continuous terrain model of the global oceans and land, British Oceanographic Data Centre [data set], National Oceanography Centre, NERC, UK, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5285/836f016a-33be-6ddc-e053-6c86abc0788e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5285/836f016a-33be-6ddc-e053-6c86abc0788e</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Goerss and Jeffries(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Goerss, J. S. and Jeffries, R. A.: Assimilation of synthetic tropical cyclone observations into the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System, Weather   Forecast., 9, 557–576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009&lt;0557:AOSTCO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009&lt;0557:AOSTCO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Gonella(1972)</label><mixed-citation>Gonella, J.: A rotary-component method for analysing meteorological and oceanographic vector time series, Deep-Sea Res., 19, 833–846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(72)90002-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0011-7471(72)90002-2</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Grace(1932)</label><mixed-citation>Grace, S. F.: The Principal Diurnal Constituent of Tidal Motion in the Gulf of Mexico, Geophys. J. Int., 3, 70–83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1932.tb00401.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.1932.tb00401.x</ext-link>, 1932.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Hiron et al.(2025)Hiron, Schönau, Raja, Chassignet, Buijsman, Arbic, Bozec, Coelho, and Solano</label><mixed-citation>Hiron, L., Schönau, M. C., Raja, K. J., Chassignet, E. P., Buijsman, M. C., Arbic, B. K., Bozec, A., Coelho, E. F., and Solano, M. S.: The Influence of Vertical Resolution on Internal Tide Energetics and Subsequent Effects on Underwater Acoustic Propagation, J. Adv.  Model. Earth Sy., 17, e2024MS004389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004389" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024MS004389</ext-link>,  2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Hogan and Rosmond(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Hogan, T. F. and Rosmond, T. E.: The description of the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System's spectral forecast model, Mon. Weather Rev., 119, 1786–1815, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119&lt;1786:TDOTNO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119&lt;1786:TDOTNO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Jayne and St. Laurent(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Jayne, S. R. and St. Laurent, L. C.: Parameterizing tidal dissipation over rough topography, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 811–814, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL012044</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Jänicke et al.(2021)Jänicke, Ebener, Dangendorf, Arns, Schindelegger, Niehüser, Haigh, Woodworth, and Jensen</label><mixed-citation>Jänicke, L., Ebener, A., Dangendorf, S., Arns, A., Schindelegger, M., Niehüser, S., Haigh, I. D., Woodworth, P., and Jensen, J.: Assessment of Tidal Range Changes in the North Sea From 1958 to 2014, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016456, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016456" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JC016456</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Klein et al.(2004)Klein, Lapeyre, and Large</label><mixed-citation>Klein, P., Lapeyre, G., and Large, W. G.: Wind ringing of the ocean in presence of mesoscale eddies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020274" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL020274</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Kunze(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Kunze, E.: Near-Inertial Wave Propagation In Geostrophic Shear, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 15, 544–565, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015&lt;0544:NIWPIG&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015&lt;0544:NIWPIG&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Lange and Van Sebille(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Lange, M. and van Sebille, E.: Parcels v0.9: prototyping a Lagrangian ocean analysis framework for the petascale age, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4175–4186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4175-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-4175-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Laxenaire et al.(2026)Laxenaire, Chassignet, and Xu</label><mixed-citation>Laxenaire, R., Chassignet, E. P., and Xu, X.: Gridded rotary velocity spectra and surface kinetic energy in the North and Equatorial Atlantic from HYCOM NEATL simulations, OceanParcels trajectories, and GDP drifter observations, SEANOE [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17882/111296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17882/111296</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Le Traon(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Le Traon, P. Y.: From satellite altimetry to Argo and operational oceanography: three revolutions in oceanography, Ocean Sci., 9, 901–915, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-901-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-9-901-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Leben(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Leben, R. R.: Altimeter-Derived Loop Current Metrics, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 181–201, ISBN 9781118666166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/161GM15" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/161GM15</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Lu et al.(2023)Lu, Dong, Xu, Yang, Zhang, Wang, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Dong, C., Xu, Z., Yang, J., Zhang, H., Wang, D., and Chen, D.: Effects of Numerical Model's Horizontal Resolution on the Vertical Transport of Near-Inertial Energy, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 207, 105223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2022.105223" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2022.105223</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Lumpkin and Pazos(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Lumpkin, R. and Pazos, M.: Measuring surface currents with Surface Velocity Program drifters: the instrument, its data, and some recent results, in: Lagrangian Analysis and Prediction of Coastal and Ocean Dynamics, edited by: Griffa, A., Kirwan, A. D., J., Mariano, A. J., Özgökmen, T., and Rossby, H. T., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 39–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535901.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511535901.003</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Middleton(1985)</label><mixed-citation> Middleton, J. F.: Drifter spectra and diffusivities, J. Mar. Res., 43, 37–55, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Middleton and Denniss(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Middleton, J. H. and Denniss, T.: The propagation of tides near the critical latitude, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid, 68, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03091929308203559" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/03091929308203559</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Mooers(1973)</label><mixed-citation>Mooers, C. N.: A technique for the cross spectrum analysis of pairs of complex-valued time series, with emphasis on properties of polarized components and rotational invariants, Deep-Sea Res., 20, 1129–1141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(73)90027-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0011-7471(73)90027-2</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Morrow and Le Traon(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Morrow, R. and Le Traon, P.-Y.: Recent advances in observing mesoscale ocean dynamics with satellite altimetry, Adv. Space Res., 50, 1062–1076, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.09.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2011.09.033</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Morrow et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Morrow, R., Fu, L.-L., Ardhuin, F., Benkiran, M., Chapron, B., Cosme, E., d'Ovidio, F., Farrar, J. T., Gille, S. T., Lapeyre, G., Le Traon, P.-Y., Pascual, A., Ponte, A., Qiu, B., Rascle, N., Ubelmann, C., Wang, J., and Zaron, E. D.: Global observations of fine-scale ocean surface topography with the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, 232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2019.00232</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Müller et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Müller, P., McWilliams, J., and Molemaker, M.: Routes to dissipation in the ocean: The 2D/3D turbulence conundrum, in: Marine Turbulence: Theories, Observations and Models, edited by: Baumert, H. Z., Simpson, J., and Sündermann, J., Cambridge University Press, 397–405, ISBN 978-0-521-83789-7, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Müller et al.(2015)Müller, Arbic, Richman, Shriver, Kunze, Scott, Wallcraft, and Zamudio</label><mixed-citation>Müller, M., Arbic, B. K., Richman, J. G., Shriver, J. F., Kunze, E. L., Scott, R. B., Wallcraft, A. J., and Zamudio, L.: Toward an internal gravity wave spectrum in global ocean models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3474–3481, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063365" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063365</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Nelson et al.(2020)Nelson, Arbic, Menemenlis, Peltier, Alford, Grisouard, and Klymak</label><mixed-citation>Nelson, A., Arbic, B., Menemenlis, D., Peltier, W., Alford, M., Grisouard, N., and Klymak, J.: Improved internal wave spectral continuum in a regional ocean model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015974" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JC015974</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Niiler and Paduan(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Niiler, P. P. and Paduan, J. D.: Wind-Driven Motions in the Northeast Pacific as Measured by Lagrangian Drifters, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25, 2819–2830, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1995)025&lt;2819:WDMITN&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1995)025&lt;2819:WDMITN&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Nikurashin and Ferrari(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Nikurashin, M. and Ferrari, R.: Radiation and dissipation of internal waves generated by geostrophic motions impinging on small-scale topography: Theory, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40, 1055–1074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4199.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JPO4199.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Niwa and Hibiya(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Niwa, Y. and Hibiya, T.: Estimation of Baroclinic Tide Energy Available for Deep Ocean Mixing Based on Three-Dimensional Global Numerical Simulations, J. Oceanogr., 67, 493–502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-011-0052-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10872-011-0052-1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Pugh and Woodworth(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Pugh, D. and Woodworth, P.: Tidal dynamics, in: Sea-Level Science: Understanding Tides, Surges, Tsunamis and Mean Sea-Level Changes, Cambridge University Press, 97–132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235778.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781139235778.008</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Raja et al.(2022)Raja, Buijsman, Shriver, Arbic, and Siyanbola</label><mixed-citation>Raja, K. J., Buijsman, M. C., Shriver, J. F., Arbic, B. K., and Siyanbola, O.: Near-inertial wave energetics modulated by background flows in a global model simulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 52, 823–840, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0130.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-21-0130.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Ray(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Ray, R. D.: Propagation of the overtide M4 through the deep Atlantic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031618</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Rimac et al.(2013)Rimac, von Storch, Eden, and Haak</label><mixed-citation>Rimac, A., von Storch, J.-S., Eden, C., and Haak, H.: The influence of high-resolution wind stress field on the power input to near-inertial motions in the ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4882–4886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50929" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50929</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Robertson(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Robertson, R.: Internal tides and baroclinicity in the Southern Weddell Sea: 2. Effects of the critical latitude and stratification, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 106, 27017–27034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000476" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JC000476</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Saha et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H.-L., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P., Kistler, R., Woollen, J., Behringer, D., Liu, H., Stokes, D., Grumbine, R., Gayno, G., Wang, J., Hou, Y.-T., Chuang, H., Juang, H. H., Sela, J., Iredell, M., Treadon, R., Kleist, D., Van Delst, P., Keyser, D., Derber, J., Ek, M., Meng, J., Wei, H., Yang, R., Lord, S., van den Dool, H., Kumar, A., Wang, W., Long, C., Chelliah, M., Xue, Y., Huang, B., Schemm, J., Ebisuzaki, W., Lin, R., Xie, P., Chen, M., Zhou, S., Higgins, W., Zou, C., Liu, Q., Chen, Y., Han, Y., Cucurull, L., Reynolds, R. W., Rutledge, G., and Goldberg, M.: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1015–1058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010bams3001.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010bams3001.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Savazzi et al.(2022)Savazzi, Nuijens, Sandu, George, and Bechtold</label><mixed-citation>Savazzi, A. C. M., Nuijens, L., Sandu, I., George, G., and Bechtold, P.: The representation of the trade winds in ECMWF forecasts and reanalyses during EUREC4A, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13049–13066, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13049-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13049-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Shriver et al.(2012)Shriver, Arbic, Richman, Ray, Metzger, Wallcraft, and Timko</label><mixed-citation>Shriver, J. F., Arbic, B. K., Richman, J. G., Ray, R. D., Metzger, E. J., Wallcraft, A. J., and Timko, P. G.: An evaluation of the barotropic and internal tides in a high-resolution global ocean circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JC008170</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Smith and Sandwell(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Smith, W. and Sandwell, D.: Global Sea Floor Topography from Satellite Altimetry and Ship Depth Soundings, Science, 277, 1956–1962, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5334.1956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.277.5334.1956</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Stewart et al.(2017)Stewart, Hogg, Griffies, Heerdegen, Ward, Spence, and England</label><mixed-citation>Stewart, K., Hogg, A. M., Griffies, S., Heerdegen, A., Ward, M., Spence, P., and England, M. H.: Vertical resolution of baroclinic modes in global ocean models, Ocean Model., 113, 50–65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.03.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.03.012</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Tchilibou et al.(2022)Tchilibou, Koch-Larrouy, Barbot, Lyard, Morel, Jouanno, and Morrow</label><mixed-citation>Tchilibou, M., Koch-Larrouy, A., Barbot, S., Lyard, F., Morel, Y., Jouanno, J., and Morrow, R.: Internal tides off the Amazon shelf during two contrasted seasons: interactions with background circulation and SSH imprints, Ocean Sci., 18, 1591–1618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1591-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-18-1591-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Teague et al.(1990)Teague, Carron, and Hogan</label><mixed-citation>Teague, W. J., Carron, M. J., and Hogan, P. J.: A comparison between the Generalized Digital Environmental Model and Levitus climatologies, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 95, 7167–7183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC095iC05p07167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC095iC05p07167</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Thomas et al.(2020)Thomas, Rainville, Asselin, Young, Girton, Whalen, Centurioni, and Hormann</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, L. N., Rainville, L., Asselin, O., Young, W. R., Girton, J., Whalen, C. B., Centurioni, L., and Hormann, V.: Direct Observations of Near-Inertial Wave ζ-Refraction in a Dipole Vortex, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090375" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL090375</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Uppala et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Uppala, S. M., Kållberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., da Costa Bechtold, V., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J. K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G. A., Li, X., Onogi, K., Saarinen, S., Sokka, N., Allan, R. P., Andersson, E., Arpe, K., Balmaseda, M. A., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Caires, S., Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Dragosavac, M., Fisher, M., Fuentes, M., Hagemann, S., Hólm, E., Hoskins, B. J., Isaksen, L., Janssen, P. A. E. M., Jenne, R., McNally, A. P., Mahfouf, J.-F., Morcrette, J.-J., Rayner, N. A., Saunders, R. W., Simon, P., Sterl, A., Trenberth, K. E., Untch, A., Vasiljevic, D., Viterbo, P., and Woollen, J.: The ERA-40 re-analysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961–3012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1256/qj.04.176</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Van Sebille et al.(2021)Van Sebille, Kehl, Lange, Delandmeter, and contributors</label><mixed-citation>Van Sebille, E., Kehl, C., Lange, M., Delandmeter, P., and The Parcels contributors: Parcels, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7035503</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Villas Bôas et al.(2025)Villas Bôas, Marechal, and Bohé</label><mixed-citation>Villas Bôas, A. B., Marechal, G., and Bohé, A.: Observing Interactions Between Waves, Winds, and Currents From SWOT, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2024GL114331, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL114331" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024GL114331</ext-link>, 2025. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Webb(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Webb, D. J.: On the shelf resonances of the English Channel and Irish Sea, Ocean Sci., 9, 731–744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-731-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-9-731-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Wunsch and Ferrari(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Wunsch, C. and Ferrari, R.: Vertical mixing, energy, and the general circulation of the oceans, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 36, 281–314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122121</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Wunsch and Stammer(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Wunsch, C. and Stammer, D.: The global frequency-wavenumber spectrum of oceanic variability estimated from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetric measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 24895–24910, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC01783" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JC01783</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Xu et al.(2022)Xu, Chassignet, Wallcraft, Arbic, Buijsman, and Solano</label><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Chassignet, E. P., Wallcraft, A. J., Arbic, B. K., Buijsman, M. C., and Solano, M.: On the spatial variability of the mesoscale sea surface height wavenumber spectra in the Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, e2022JC018769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018769" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JC018769</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Xu et al.(2023)Xu, Chassignet, and Wallcraft</label><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Chassignet, E. P., and Wallcraft, A. J.: Impact of vertical resolution on representing baroclinic modes and water mass distribution in the North Atlantic, Ocean Model., 186, 102261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2023.102261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2023.102261</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Yu et al.(2019)Yu, Ponte, Elipot, Menemenlis, Zaron, and Abernathey</label><mixed-citation>Yu, X., Ponte, A. L., Elipot, S., Menemenlis, D., Zaron, E. D., and Abernathey, R.: Surface kinetic energy distributions in the global oceans from a high-resolution numerical model and surface drifter observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 9757–9766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL083074</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Zaron and Elipot(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Zaron, E. D. and Elipot, S.: An assessment of global ocean barotropic tide models using geodetic mission altimetry and surface drifters, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 51, 63–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-20-0089.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-20-0089.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Zhai et al.(2010)Zhai, Johnson, and Marshall</label><mixed-citation>Zhai, X., Johnson, H. L., and Marshall, D. P.: Significant sink of ocean-eddy energy near western boundaries, Nat. Geosci., 3, 608–612, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo943" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo943</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Zhang et al.(2024)Zhang, Yu, Ponte, Caspar-Cohen, Le Gentil, Wang, and Gong</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Yu, X., Ponte, A. L., Caspar-Cohen, Z., Le Gentil, S., Wang, L., and Gong, W.: Lagrangian Versus Eulerian Spectral Estimates of Surface Kinetic Energy Over the Global Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 129, e2024JC021057, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JC021057</ext-link>,   2024.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Surface horizontal kinetic energy sensitivity to numerical parameters in tidal-resolving North and Equatorial Atlantic simulations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Abdalla et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abdalla, S., Abdeh Kolahchi, A., Ablain, M., Adusumilli, S., Aich Bhowmick, S., Alou-Font, E., Amarouche, L., Andersen, O. B., Antich, H., Aouf, L., Arbic, B., Armitage, T., Arnault, S., Artana, C., Aulicino, G., Ayoub, N., Badulin, S., Baker, S., Banks, C., Bao, L., Barbetta, S., Barceló-Llull, B., Barlier, F., Basu, S., Bauer-Gottwein, P., Becker, M., Beckley, B., Bellefond, N., Belonenko, T., Benkiran, M., Benkouider, T., Bennartz, R., Benveniste, J., Bercher, N., Berge-Nguyen, M., Bettencourt, J., Blarel, F., Blazquez, A., Blumstein, D., Bonnefond, P., Borde, F., Bouffard, J., Boy, F., Boy, J.-P., Brachet, C., Brasseur, P., Braun, A., Brocca, L., Brockley, D., Brodeau, L., Brown, S., Bruinsma, S., Bulczak, A., Buzzard, S., Cahill, M., Calmant, S., Calzas, M., Camici, S., Cancet, M., Capdeville, H., Carabajal, C. C., Carrere, L., Cazenave, A., Chassignet, E. P., Chauhan, P., Cherchali, S., Chereskin, T., Cheymol, C., Ciani, D., Cipollini, P., Cirillo, F., Cosme, E., Coss, S., Cotroneo, Y., Cotton, D., Couhert, A., Coutin-Faye, S., Crétaux, J.-F., Cyr, F., d'Ovidio, F., Darrozes, J., David, C., Dayoub, N., De Staerke, D., Deng, X., Desai, S., Desjonqueres, J.-D., Dettmering, D., Di Bella, A., Díaz-Barroso, L., Dibarboure, G., Dieng, H. B., Dinardo, S., Dobslaw, H., Dodet, G., Doglioli, A., Domeneghetti, A., Donahue, D., Dong, S., Donlon, C., Dorandeu, J., Drezen, C., Drinkwater, M., Du Penhoat, Y., Dushaw, B., Egido, A., Erofeeva, S., Escudier, P., Esselborn, S., Exertier, P., Fablet, R., Falco, C., Farrell, S. L., Faugere, Y., Femenias, P., Fenoglio, L., Fernandes, J., Fernández, J. G., Ferrage, P., Ferrari, R., Fichen, L., Filippucci, P., Flampouris, S., Fleury, S., Fornari, M., Forsberg, R., Frappart, F., Frery, M.-L., Garcia, P., Garcia-Mondejar, A., Gaudelli, J., Gaultier, L., Getirana, A., Gibert, F., Gil, A., Gilbert, L., Gille, S., Giulicchi, L., Gómez-Enri, J., Gómez-Navarro, L., Gommenginger, C., Gourdeau, L., Griffin, D., Groh, A., Guerin, A., Guerrero, R., Guinle, T., Gupta, P., Gutknecht, B. D., Hamon, M., Han, G., Hauser, D., Helm, V., Hendricks, S., Hernandez, F., Hogg, A., Horwath, M., Idžanović, M., Janssen, P., Jeansou, E., Jia, Y., Jia, Y., Jiang, L., Johannessen, J. A., Kamachi, M., Karimova, S., Kelly, K., Kim, S. Y., King, R., Kittel, C. M. M., Klein, P., Klos, A., Knudsen, P., Koenig, R., Kostianoy, A., Kouraev, A., Kumar, R., Labroue, S., Lago, L. S., Lambin, J., Lasson, L., Laurain, O., Laxenaire, R., Lázaro, C., Le Gac, S., Le Sommer, J., Le Traon, P.-Y., Lebedev, S., Léger, F., Legresy, B., Lemoine, F., Lenain, L., Leuliette, E., Levy, M., Lillibridge, J., Liu, J., Llovel, W., Lyard, F., Macintosh, C., Makhoul Varona, E., Manfredi, C., Marin, F., Mason, E., Massari, C., Mavrocordatos, C., Maximenko, N., McMillan, M., Medina, T., Melet, A., Meloni, M., Mertikas, S., Metref, S., Meyssignac, B., Minster, J.-F., Moreau, T., Moreira, D., Morel, Y., Morrow, R., Moyard, J., Mulet, S., Naeije, M., Nerem, R. S., Ngodock, H., Nielsen, K., Nilsen, J. E. Ø., Niño, F., Nogueira Loddo, C., Noûs, C., Obligis, E., Otosaka, I., Otten, M., Oztunali Ozbahceci, B., P. Raj, R., Paiva, R., Paniagua, G., Paolo, F., Paris, A., Pascual, A., Passaro, M., Paul, S., Pavelsky, T., Pearson, C., Penduff, T., Peng, F., Perosanz, F., Picot, N., Piras, F., Poggiali, V., Poirier, É., Ponce de León, S., Prants, S., Prigent, C., Provost, C., Pujol, M.-I., Qiu, B., Quilfen, Y., Rami, A., Raney, R. K., Raynal, M., Remy, E., Rémy, F., Restano, M., Richardson, A., Richardson, D., Ricker, R., Ricko, M., Rinne, E., Rose, S. K., Rosmorduc, V., Rudenko, S., Ruiz, S., Ryan, B. J., Salaün, C., Sanchez-Roman, A., Sandberg Sørensen, L., Sandwell, D., Saraceno, M., Scagliola, M., Schaeffer, P., Scharffenberg, M. G., Scharroo, R., Schiller, A., Schneider, R., Schwatke, C., Scozzari, A., Ser-giacomi, E., Seyler, F., Shah, R., Sharma, R., Shaw, A., Shepherd, A., Shriver, J., Shum, C. K., Simons, W., Simonsen, S. B., Slater, T., Smith, W., Soares, S., Sokolovskiy, M., Soudarin, L., Spatar, C., Speich, S., Srinivasan, M., Srokosz, M., Stanev, E., Staneva, J., Steunou, N., Stroeve, J., Su, B., Sulistioadi, Y. B., Swain, D., Sylvestre-baron, A., Taburet, N., Tailleux, R., Takayama, K., Tapley, B., Tarpanelli, A., Tavernier, G., Testut, L., Thakur, P. K., Thibaut, P., Thompson, L., Tintoré, J., Tison, C., Tourain, C., Tournadre, J., Townsend, B., Tran, N., Trilles, S., Tsamados, M., Tseng, K.-H., Ubelmann, C., Uebbing, B., Vergara, O., Verron, J., Vieira, T., Vignudelli, S., Vinogradova Shiffer, N., Visser, P., Vivier, F., Volkov, D., von Schuckmann, K., Vuglinskii, V., Vuilleumier, P., Walter, B., Wang, J., Wang, C., Watson, C., Wilkin, J., Willis, J., Wilson, H., Woodworth, P., Yang, K., Yao, F., Zaharia, R., Zakharova, E., Zaron, E. D., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., Zinchenko, V., and Zlotnicki, V.: Altimetry for the future: Building on 25 years of progress, Adv.
Space Res., 68, 319–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.022</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Ajayi et al.(2020)Ajayi, Le Sommer, Chassignet, Molines, Xu, Albert,
and Cosme</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ajayi, A., Le Sommer, J., Chassignet, E., Molines, J.-M., Xu, X., Albert, A.,
and Cosme, E.: Spatial and Temporal Variability of the North Atlantic Eddy
Field From Two Kilometric-Resolution Ocean Models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015827</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Ajayi et al.(2021)Ajayi, Le Sommer, Chassignet, Molines, Xu, Albert,
and Dewar</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ajayi, A., Le Sommer, J., Chassignet, E. P., Molines, J.-M., Xu, X., Albert,
A., and Dewar, W.: Diagnosing Cross-Scale Kinetic Energy Exchanges From Two
Submesoscale Permitting Ocean Models, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 13, e2019MS001923, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001923" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001923</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Amante and Eakins(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Amante, C. and Eakins, B.: ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model:
procedures, data sources and analysis, NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS
NGDC-24, National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7289/V5C8276M" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7289/V5C8276M</a>,
2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Ansong et al.(2015)Ansong, Arbic, Buijsman, Richman, Shriver, and
Wallcraft</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ansong, J. K., Arbic, B. K., Buijsman, M. C., Richman, J. G., Shriver, J. F.,
and Wallcraft, A. J.: Indirect evidence for substantial damping of low-mode
internal tides in the open ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
120, 6057–6071, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010998" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010998</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Arbic(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arbic, B. K.: Incorporating tides and internal gravity waves within global
ocean general circulation models: A review, Prog. Oceanogr., 206,
102824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102824" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102824</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Arbic et al.(2010)Arbic, Wallcraft, and Metzger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arbic, B. K., Wallcraft, A. J., and Metzger, E. J.: Concurrent simulation of
the eddying general circulation and tides in a global ocean model, Ocean
Model., 32, 175–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2010.01.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2010.01.007</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Arbic et al.(2012)Arbic, Richman, Shriver, Timko, Metzger, and
Wallcraft</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arbic, B. K., Richman, J. G., Shriver, J. F., Timko, P. G., Metzger, E. J., and
Wallcraft, A. J.: Global modeling of internal tides: Within an eddying ocean
general circulation model, Oceanography, 25, 20–29,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2012.38" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2012.38</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Arbic et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arbic, B. K., Alford, M. H., Ansong, J. K., Buijsman, M. C., Ciotti, R. B., Farrar, J. T., Hallberg, R. W., Henze, C. E., Hill, C. N., Luecke, C. A., Menemenlis, D., Metzger, E. J., Müller, M., Nelson, A. D., Nelson, B. C., Ngodock, H. E., Ponte, R. M., Richman, J. G., Savage, A. C., Scott, R. B., Shriver, J. F., Simmons, H. L., Souopgui, I., Timko, P. G., Wallcraft, A. J., Zamudio, L., and Zhao, Z.: A primer on global internal tide and internal gravity wave continuum modeling in HYCOM and MITgcm, New frontiers in operational oceanography, 307–392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch13</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Arbic et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arbic, B. K., Elipot, S., Brasch, J. M., Menemenlis, D., Ponte, A. L., Shriver, J. F., Yu, X., Zaron, E. D., Alford, M. H., Buijsman, M. C., Abernathey, R., Garcia, D., Guan, L., Martin, P. E., and Nelson, A. D.:  Near-surface oceanic kinetic energy distributions from drifter observations
and numerical models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127,
e2022JC018551, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018551</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Archer et al.(2025)Archer, Wang, Klein, Dibarboure, and
Fu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Archer, M., Wang, J., Klein, P., Dibarboure, G., and Fu, L.-L.: Wide-swath
satellite altimetry unveils global submesoscale ocean dynamics, Nature, 640,
691–696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08722-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08722-8</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Beardsley et al.(1995)Beardsley, Candela, Limeburner, Geyer, Lentz,
Castro, Cacchione, and Carneiro</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beardsley, R. C., Candela, J., Limeburner, R., Geyer, W. R., Lentz, S. J.,
Castro, B. M., Cacchione, D., and Carneiro, N.: The M2 tide on the Amazon
Shelf, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 2283–2319,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01688" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01688</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Bleck(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bleck, R.: An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid
isopycnic-Cartesian coordinates, Ocean Model., 4, 55–88,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(01)00012-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(01)00012-9</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Buijsman et al.(2015)Buijsman, Arbic, Green, Helber, Richman,
Shriver, Timko, and Wallcraft</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buijsman, M. C., Arbic, B. K., Green, J., Helber, R. W., Richman, J. G.,
Shriver, J. F., Timko, P., and Wallcraft, A.: Optimizing internal wave drag
in a forward barotropic model with semidiurnal tides, Ocean Model., 85,
42–55, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.11.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.11.003</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Buijsman et al.(2020)Buijsman, Stephenson, Ansong, Arbic, Green,
Richman, Shriver, Vic, Wallcraft, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buijsman, M. C., Stephenson, G. R., Ansong, J. K., Arbic, B. K., Green, J. M.,
Richman, J. G., Shriver, J. F., Vic, C., Wallcraft, A. J., and Zhao, Z.: On
the interplay between horizontal resolution and wave drag and their effect on
tidal baroclinic mode waves in realistic global ocean simulations, Ocean
Model., 152, 101656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2020.101656" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2020.101656</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Buijsman et al.(2025)Buijsman, Abdulfatai, Arbic, Chassignet, Hiron,
Shriver, Solano, Varma, and Xu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buijsman, M. C., Abdulfatai, M., Arbic, B. K., Chassignet, E. P., Hiron, L.,
Shriver, J. F., Solano, M., Varma, D., and Xu, X.: Energetics of
(Super)Tidal Baroclinic Modes in a Realistically Forced Global Ocean
Simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 130, e2025JC022460,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JC022460" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JC022460</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Carnes(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carnes, M. R.: Description and evaluation of GDEMV 3.0. Naval Rearch
Laboratory Memo, Tech. rep., NRL/MR/7330-09-9165, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Caspar-Cohen et al.(2022)Caspar-Cohen, Ponte, Lahaye, Carton, Yu, and
Legentil</label><mixed-citation>
      
Caspar-Cohen, Z., Ponte, A., Lahaye, N., Carton, X., Yu, X., and Legentil, S.:
Characterization of Internal Tide Incoherence: Eulerian versus Lagrangian
Perspectives, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 52, 1245–1259,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0088.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0088.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Caspar-Cohen et al.(2025)Caspar-Cohen, Ponte, Lahaye, Zaron, Arbic,
Yu, LeGentil, and Menemenlis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Caspar-Cohen, Z., Ponte, A., Lahaye, N., Zaron, E. D., Arbic, B. K., Yu, X.,
LeGentil, S., and Menemenlis, D.: Combining surface drifters and high
resolution global simulations enables the mapping of internal tide surface
energy, Sci. Rep., 15, 10672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92662-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92662-w</a>,
2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Chassignet and Xu(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chassignet, E. P. and Xu, X.: Impact of horizontal resolution (1/12 to 1/50)
on Gulf Stream separation, penetration, and variability, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 47, 1999–2021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0031.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0031.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Chassignet and Xu(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chassignet, E. P. and Xu, X.: On the importance of high-resolution in
large-scale ocean models, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1621–1634,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0385-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0385-7</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Chassignet and Xu(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chassignet, E. P. and Xu, X.: Impact of wind stress formulation on Gulf Stream
pathway and variability, Front. Mar. Sci., 12, 1739630,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1739630" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1739630</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Chassignet et al.(2003)Chassignet, Smith, Halliwell, and
Bleck</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chassignet, E. P., Smith, L. T., Halliwell, G. R., and Bleck, R.: North
Atlantic Simulations with the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM): Impact
of the Vertical Coordinate Choice, Reference Pressure, and Thermobaricity,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 2504–2526,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033&lt;2504:naswth&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033&lt;2504:naswth&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Chassignet et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chassignet, E. P., Hurlburt, H. E., Smedstad, O. M., Halliwell, G. R., Wallcraft, A. J., Metzger, E. J., Blanton, B. O., Lozano, C., Rao, D. B., Hogan, P. J., and Srinivasan, A.: Generalized vertical coordinates for eddy-resolving global and coastal ocean forecasts, Oceanography, 19, 118–129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2006.95" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2006.95</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Chassignet et al.(2009)Chassignet, Hurlburt, Metzger, Smedstad,
Cummings, Halliwell, Bleck, Baraille, Wallcraft, Lozano, Tolman, Srinivasan,
Hankin, Cornillon, Weisberg, Barth, He, Werner, and Wilkin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chassignet, E. P., Hurlburt, H. E., Metzger, E. J., Smedstad, O. M., Cummings,
J. A., Halliwell, G. R., Bleck, R., Baraille, R., Wallcraft, A. J., Lozano,
C., Tolman, H. L., Srinivasan, A., Hankin, S., Cornillon, P., Weisberg, R.,
Barth, A., He, R., Werner, F., and Wilkin, J.: US GODAE: Global Ocean
Prediction with the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM), Oceanography, 22,
64–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.39" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.39</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Chassignet et al.(2020)Chassignet, Yeager, Fox-Kemper, Bozec,
Castruccio, Danabasoglu, Kim, Koldunov, Li, and Lin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chassignet, E. P., Yeager, S. G., Fox-Kemper, B., Bozec, A., Castruccio, F., Danabasoglu, G., Horvat, C., Kim, W. M., Koldunov, N., Li, Y., Lin, P., Liu, H., Sein, D. V., Sidorenko, D., Wang, Q., and Xu, X.: Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean–sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4595–4637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4595-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Chassignet et al.(2023)Chassignet, Xu, Bozec, and
Uchida</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chassignet, E. P., Xu, X., Bozec, A., and Uchida, T.: Impact of the New
England seamount chain on Gulf Stream pathway and variability, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 53, 1871–1886, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-23-0008.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-23-0008.1</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Cummins et al.(2010)Cummins, Karsten, and Arbic</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cummins, P. F., Karsten, R. H., and Arbic, B. K.: The semi-diurnal tide in
Hudson strait as a resonant channel oscillation, Atmosphere-Ocean, 48,
163–176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3137/OC307.2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3137/OC307.2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Dai(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dai, A.: The diurnal cycle from observations and ERA5 in surface pressure,
temperature, humidity, and winds, Clim. Dynam., 61, 2965–2990,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06721-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06721-x</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Dai and Deser(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dai, A. and Deser, C.: Diurnal and semidiurnal variations in global surface
wind and divergence fields, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
104, 31109–31125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900927" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900927</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Davis(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davis, R.: Oceanic property transport, Lagrangian particle statistics, and
their prediction, J. Marine Res., 41, 163–194, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Delandmeter and Van Sebille(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Delandmeter, P. and van Sebille, E.: The Parcels v2.0 Lagrangian framework: new field interpolation schemes, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3571–3584, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3571-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3571-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>De Marez et al.(2020)De Marez, Lahaye, and Gula</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Marez, C., Lahaye, N. J., and Gula, J.: Interaction of the Gulf Stream with
small scale topography: A focus on lee waves, Sci. Rep., 10, 2332,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59297-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59297-5</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Egbert and Ray(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Egbert, G. D. and Ray, R. D.: Estimates of M2 tidal energy dissipation from
TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter data, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 106,
22475–22502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000699" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000699</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Elipot and Lumpkin(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elipot, S. and Lumpkin, R.: Spectral description of oceanic near-surface
variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032874" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032874</a>,
2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Elipot et al.(2016)Elipot, Lumpkin, Perez, Lilly, Early, and
Sykulski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elipot, S., Lumpkin, R., Perez, R. C., Lilly, J. M., Early, J. J., and
Sykulski, A. M.: A global surface drifter data set at hourly resolution,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 2937–2966,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011716" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011716</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Elipot et al.(2022)Elipot, Sykulski, Lumpkin, Centurioni, and
Pazos</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elipot, S., Sykulski, A., Lumpkin, R., Centurioni, L., and Pazos, M.: Hourly
location, current velocity, and temperature collected from Global Drifter
Program drifters world-wide, Accession, 248584, v1,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.25921/x46c-3620" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25921/x46c-3620</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Emery and Thomson(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Emery, W. J. and Thomson, R. E.: Data Analysis Methods in Physical
Oceanography, 2nd and Revised Edn., Elsevier, ISBN 978-0-444-50756-3, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Ferrari and Wunsch(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ferrari, R. and Wunsch, C.: Ocean circulation kinetic energy: Reservoirs,
sources, and sinks, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102139</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Flexas et al.(2019)Flexas, Thompson, Torres, Klein, Farrar, Zhang,
and Menemenlis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Flexas, M. M., Thompson, A. F., Torres, H. S., Klein, P., Farrar, J. T., Zhang,
H., and Menemenlis, D.: Global estimates of the energy transfer from the
wind to the ocean, with emphasis on near-inertial oscillations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 124, 5723–5746, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014453</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Fratantoni and Glickson(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fratantoni, D. M. and Glickson, D. A.: North Brazil Current ring generation
and evolution observed with SeaWiFS, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32,
1058–1074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;1058:NBCRGA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;1058:NBCRGA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Fu et al.(2024)Fu, Pavelsky, Cretaux, Morrow, Farrar, Vaze, Sengenes,
Vinogradova-Shiffer, Sylvestre-Baron, Picot, and Dibarboure</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fu, L.-L., Pavelsky, T., Cretaux, J.-F., Morrow, R., Farrar, J. T., Vaze, P.,
Sengenes, P., Vinogradova-Shiffer, N., Sylvestre-Baron, A., Picot, N., and
Dibarboure, G.: The Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission: A
Breakthrough in Radar Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Land Surface Water,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107652,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107652" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107652</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Furevik and Foldvik(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Furevik, T. and Foldvik, A.: Stability at M2 critical latitude in the Barents
Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 101, 8823–8837,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC00081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC00081</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Gabioux et al.(2005)Gabioux, Vinzon, and Paiva</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gabioux, M., Vinzon, S. B., and Paiva, A. M.: Tidal propagation over fluid mud
layers on the Amazon shelf, Cont. Shelf Res., 25, 113–125,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.09.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.09.001</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Garrett(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garrett, C.: Tidal resonance in the Bay of Fundy and Gulf of Maine, Nature,
238, 441–443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/238441a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/238441a0</a>, 1972.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Garrett and Munk(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garrett, C. and Munk, W.: Space-time scales of internal waves: A progress
report, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 291–297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC080i003p00291" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC080i003p00291</a>, 1975.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>GEBCO Bathymetric Compilation Group 2019(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
GEBCO Bathymetric Compilation Group 2019: The GEBCO_2019 Grid – a
continuous terrain model of the global oceans and land, British Oceanographic
Data Centre [data set], National Oceanography Centre, NERC, UK,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5285/836f016a-33be-6ddc-e053-6c86abc0788e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5285/836f016a-33be-6ddc-e053-6c86abc0788e</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Goerss and Jeffries(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goerss, J. S. and Jeffries, R. A.: Assimilation of synthetic tropical cyclone
observations into the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System,
Weather   Forecast., 9, 557–576,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009&lt;0557:AOSTCO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009&lt;0557:AOSTCO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Gonella(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gonella, J.: A rotary-component method for analysing meteorological and
oceanographic vector time series, Deep-Sea Res., 19, 833–846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(72)90002-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(72)90002-2</a>, 1972.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Grace(1932)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grace, S. F.: The Principal Diurnal Constituent of Tidal Motion in the Gulf of
Mexico, Geophys. J. Int., 3, 70–83,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1932.tb00401.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1932.tb00401.x</a>, 1932.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Hiron et al.(2025)Hiron, Schönau, Raja, Chassignet, Buijsman, Arbic,
Bozec, Coelho, and Solano</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hiron, L., Schönau, M. C., Raja, K. J., Chassignet, E. P., Buijsman, M. C.,
Arbic, B. K., Bozec, A., Coelho, E. F., and Solano, M. S.: The Influence of
Vertical Resolution on Internal Tide Energetics and Subsequent Effects on
Underwater Acoustic Propagation, J. Adv.  Model. Earth
Sy., 17, e2024MS004389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004389" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004389</a>,  2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Hogan and Rosmond(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hogan, T. F. and Rosmond, T. E.: The description of the Navy Operational Global
Atmospheric Prediction System's spectral forecast model, Mon. Weather
Rev., 119, 1786–1815,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119&lt;1786:TDOTNO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119&lt;1786:TDOTNO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Jayne and St. Laurent(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jayne, S. R. and St. Laurent, L. C.: Parameterizing tidal dissipation over
rough topography, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 811–814,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012044</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Jänicke et al.(2021)Jänicke, Ebener, Dangendorf, Arns,
Schindelegger, Niehüser, Haigh, Woodworth, and Jensen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jänicke, L., Ebener, A., Dangendorf, S., Arns, A., Schindelegger, M.,
Niehüser, S., Haigh, I. D., Woodworth, P., and Jensen, J.: Assessment of
Tidal Range Changes in the North Sea From 1958 to 2014, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016456,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016456" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016456</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Klein et al.(2004)Klein, Lapeyre, and Large</label><mixed-citation>
      
Klein, P., Lapeyre, G., and Large, W. G.: Wind ringing of the ocean in presence
of mesoscale eddies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020274" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020274</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Kunze(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kunze, E.: Near-Inertial Wave Propagation In Geostrophic Shear, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 15, 544–565,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015&lt;0544:NIWPIG&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015&lt;0544:NIWPIG&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Lange and Van Sebille(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lange, M. and van Sebille, E.: Parcels v0.9: prototyping a Lagrangian ocean analysis framework for the petascale age, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4175–4186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4175-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4175-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Laxenaire et al.(2026)Laxenaire, Chassignet, and
Xu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laxenaire, R., Chassignet, E. P., and Xu, X.: Gridded rotary velocity spectra
and surface kinetic energy in the North and Equatorial Atlantic from HYCOM
NEATL simulations, OceanParcels trajectories, and GDP drifter observations,
SEANOE [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.17882/111296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17882/111296</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Le Traon(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Le Traon, P. Y.: From satellite altimetry to Argo and operational oceanography: three revolutions in oceanography, Ocean Sci., 9, 901–915, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-901-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-901-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Leben(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leben, R. R.: Altimeter-Derived Loop Current Metrics, American
Geophysical Union (AGU), 181–201, ISBN 9781118666166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/161GM15" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/161GM15</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Lu et al.(2023)Lu, Dong, Xu, Yang, Zhang, Wang, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, X., Dong, C., Xu, Z., Yang, J., Zhang, H., Wang, D., and Chen, D.: Effects
of Numerical Model's Horizontal Resolution on the Vertical Transport of
Near-Inertial Energy, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 207, 105223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2022.105223" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2022.105223</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Lumpkin and Pazos(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lumpkin, R. and Pazos, M.: Measuring surface currents with Surface Velocity
Program drifters: the instrument, its data, and some recent results, in:
Lagrangian Analysis and Prediction of Coastal and Ocean Dynamics, edited by:
Griffa, A., Kirwan, A. D., J., Mariano, A. J., Özgökmen, T., and
Rossby, H. T., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 39–67,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535901.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535901.003</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Middleton(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Middleton, J. F.: Drifter spectra and diffusivities, J. Mar.
Res., 43, 37–55, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Middleton and Denniss(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Middleton, J. H. and Denniss, T.: The propagation of tides near the critical
latitude, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid, 68, 1–13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03091929308203559" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/03091929308203559</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Mooers(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mooers, C. N.: A technique for the cross spectrum analysis of pairs of
complex-valued time series, with emphasis on properties of polarized
components and rotational invariants, Deep-Sea Res., 20, 1129–1141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(73)90027-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(73)90027-2</a>, 1973.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Morrow and Le Traon(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morrow, R. and Le Traon, P.-Y.: Recent advances in observing mesoscale ocean
dynamics with satellite altimetry, Adv. Space Res., 50,
1062–1076, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.09.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.09.033</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Morrow et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morrow, R., Fu, L.-L., Ardhuin, F., Benkiran, M., Chapron, B., Cosme, E., d'Ovidio, F., Farrar, J. T., Gille, S. T., Lapeyre, G., Le Traon, P.-Y., Pascual, A., Ponte, A., Qiu, B., Rascle, N., Ubelmann, C., Wang, J., and Zaron, E. D.: Global observations of fine-scale ocean surface topography with the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, 232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00232" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00232</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Müller et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Müller, P., McWilliams, J., and Molemaker, M.: Routes to dissipation in the ocean: The 2D/3D turbulence conundrum, in: Marine Turbulence: Theories, Observations and Models, edited by: Baumert, H. Z., Simpson, J., and Sündermann, J., Cambridge University Press, 397–405, ISBN 978-0-521-83789-7, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Müller et al.(2015)Müller, Arbic, Richman, Shriver, Kunze, Scott,
Wallcraft, and Zamudio</label><mixed-citation>
      
Müller, M., Arbic, B. K., Richman, J. G., Shriver, J. F., Kunze, E. L., Scott,
R. B., Wallcraft, A. J., and Zamudio, L.: Toward an internal gravity wave
spectrum in global ocean models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
3474–3481, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063365" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063365</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Nelson et al.(2020)Nelson, Arbic, Menemenlis, Peltier, Alford,
Grisouard, and Klymak</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nelson, A., Arbic, B., Menemenlis, D., Peltier, W., Alford, M., Grisouard, N.,
and Klymak, J.: Improved internal wave spectral continuum in a regional
ocean model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015974,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015974" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015974</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Niiler and Paduan(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niiler, P. P. and Paduan, J. D.: Wind-Driven Motions in the Northeast Pacific
as Measured by Lagrangian Drifters, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25,
2819–2830, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1995)025&lt;2819:WDMITN&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1995)025&lt;2819:WDMITN&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Nikurashin and Ferrari(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nikurashin, M. and Ferrari, R.: Radiation and dissipation of internal waves
generated by geostrophic motions impinging on small-scale topography:
Theory, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40, 1055–1074,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4199.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4199.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Niwa and Hibiya(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niwa, Y. and Hibiya, T.: Estimation of Baroclinic Tide Energy Available for
Deep Ocean Mixing Based on Three-Dimensional Global Numerical Simulations,
J. Oceanogr., 67, 493–502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-011-0052-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-011-0052-1</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Pugh and Woodworth(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pugh, D. and Woodworth, P.: Tidal dynamics, in: Sea-Level Science: Understanding Tides, Surges, Tsunamis and Mean Sea-Level Changes, Cambridge University Press, 97–132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235778.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235778.008</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Raja et al.(2022)Raja, Buijsman, Shriver, Arbic, and
Siyanbola</label><mixed-citation>
      
Raja, K. J., Buijsman, M. C., Shriver, J. F., Arbic, B. K., and Siyanbola, O.:
Near-inertial wave energetics modulated by background flows in a global
model simulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 52, 823–840,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0130.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0130.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Ray(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ray, R. D.: Propagation of the overtide M4 through the deep Atlantic Ocean,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031618</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Rimac et al.(2013)Rimac, von Storch, Eden, and Haak</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rimac, A., von Storch, J.-S., Eden, C., and Haak, H.: The influence of
high-resolution wind stress field on the power input to near-inertial motions
in the ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4882–4886,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50929" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50929</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Robertson(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Robertson, R.: Internal tides and baroclinicity in the Southern Weddell Sea: 2.
Effects of the critical latitude and stratification, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 106, 27017–27034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000476" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000476</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Saha et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H.-L., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P., Kistler, R., Woollen, J., Behringer, D., Liu, H., Stokes, D., Grumbine, R., Gayno, G., Wang, J., Hou, Y.-T., Chuang, H., Juang, H. H., Sela, J., Iredell, M., Treadon, R., Kleist, D., Van Delst, P., Keyser, D., Derber, J., Ek, M., Meng, J., Wei, H., Yang, R., Lord, S., van den Dool, H., Kumar, A., Wang, W., Long, C., Chelliah, M., Xue, Y., Huang, B., Schemm, J., Ebisuzaki, W., Lin, R., Xie, P., Chen, M., Zhou, S., Higgins, W., Zou, C., Liu, Q., Chen, Y., Han, Y., Cucurull, L., Reynolds, R. W., Rutledge, G., and Goldberg, M.: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
91, 1015–1058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010bams3001.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010bams3001.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Savazzi et al.(2022)Savazzi, Nuijens, Sandu, George, and
Bechtold</label><mixed-citation>
      
Savazzi, A. C. M., Nuijens, L., Sandu, I., George, G., and Bechtold, P.: The representation of the trade winds in ECMWF forecasts and reanalyses during EUREC4A, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13049–13066, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13049-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13049-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Shriver et al.(2012)Shriver, Arbic, Richman, Ray, Metzger, Wallcraft,
and Timko</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shriver, J. F., Arbic, B. K., Richman, J. G., Ray, R. D., Metzger, E. J.,
Wallcraft, A. J., and Timko, P. G.: An evaluation of the barotropic and
internal tides in a high-resolution global ocean circulation model, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008170</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Smith and Sandwell(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, W. and Sandwell, D.: Global Sea Floor Topography from Satellite
Altimetry and Ship Depth Soundings, Science, 277, 1956–1962,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5334.1956" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5334.1956</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Stewart et al.(2017)Stewart, Hogg, Griffies, Heerdegen, Ward, Spence,
and England</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stewart, K., Hogg, A. M., Griffies, S., Heerdegen, A., Ward, M., Spence, P.,
and England, M. H.: Vertical resolution of baroclinic modes in global ocean
models, Ocean Model., 113, 50–65, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.03.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.03.012</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Tchilibou et al.(2022)Tchilibou, Koch-Larrouy, Barbot, Lyard, Morel,
Jouanno, and Morrow</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tchilibou, M., Koch-Larrouy, A., Barbot, S., Lyard, F., Morel, Y., Jouanno, J., and Morrow, R.: Internal tides off the Amazon shelf during two contrasted seasons: interactions with background circulation and SSH imprints, Ocean Sci., 18, 1591–1618, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1591-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1591-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Teague et al.(1990)Teague, Carron, and Hogan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Teague, W. J., Carron, M. J., and Hogan, P. J.: A comparison between the
Generalized Digital Environmental Model and Levitus climatologies, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 95, 7167–7183,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC095iC05p07167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC095iC05p07167</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Thomas et al.(2020)Thomas, Rainville, Asselin, Young, Girton, Whalen,
Centurioni, and Hormann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thomas, L. N., Rainville, L., Asselin, O., Young, W. R., Girton, J., Whalen,
C. B., Centurioni, L., and Hormann, V.: Direct Observations of Near-Inertial
Wave ζ-Refraction in a Dipole Vortex, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2020GL090375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090375" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090375</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Uppala et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Uppala, S. M., Kållberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., da Costa Bechtold, V., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J. K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G. A., Li, X., Onogi, K., Saarinen, S., Sokka, N., Allan, R. P., Andersson, E., Arpe, K., Balmaseda, M. A., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Caires, S., Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Dragosavac, M., Fisher, M., Fuentes, M., Hagemann, S., Hólm, E., Hoskins, B. J., Isaksen, L., Janssen, P. A. E. M., Jenne, R., McNally, A. P., Mahfouf, J.-F., Morcrette, J.-J., Rayner, N. A., Saunders, R. W., Simon, P., Sterl, A., Trenberth, K. E., Untch, A., Vasiljevic, D., Viterbo, P., and Woollen, J.: The ERA-40 re-analysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961–3012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.176" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.176</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Van Sebille et al.(2021)Van Sebille, Kehl, Lange, Delandmeter, and
contributors</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Sebille, E., Kehl, C., Lange, M., Delandmeter, P., and The Parcels contributors:
Parcels, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035503" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035503</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Villas Bôas et al.(2025)Villas Bôas, Marechal, and
Bohé</label><mixed-citation>
      
Villas Bôas, A. B., Marechal, G., and Bohé, A.: Observing Interactions
Between Waves, Winds, and Currents From SWOT, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
52, e2024GL114331, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL114331" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL114331</a>, 2025.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Webb(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Webb, D. J.: On the shelf resonances of the English Channel and Irish Sea, Ocean Sci., 9, 731–744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-731-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-731-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Wunsch and Ferrari(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wunsch, C. and Ferrari, R.: Vertical mixing, energy, and the general
circulation of the oceans, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 36, 281–314,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122121</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Wunsch and Stammer(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wunsch, C. and Stammer, D.: The global frequency-wavenumber spectrum of
oceanic variability estimated from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetric measurements,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 24895–24910, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC01783" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC01783</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Xu et al.(2022)Xu, Chassignet, Wallcraft, Arbic, Buijsman, and
Solano</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, X., Chassignet, E. P., Wallcraft, A. J., Arbic, B. K., Buijsman, M. C., and
Solano, M.: On the spatial variability of the mesoscale sea surface height
wavenumber spectra in the Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, e2022JC018769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018769" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018769</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Xu et al.(2023)Xu, Chassignet, and Wallcraft</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, X., Chassignet, E. P., and Wallcraft, A. J.: Impact of vertical resolution
on representing baroclinic modes and water mass distribution in the North
Atlantic, Ocean Model., 186, 102261,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2023.102261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2023.102261</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Yu et al.(2019)Yu, Ponte, Elipot, Menemenlis, Zaron, and
Abernathey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, X., Ponte, A. L., Elipot, S., Menemenlis, D., Zaron, E. D., and Abernathey,
R.: Surface kinetic energy distributions in the global oceans from a
high-resolution numerical model and surface drifter observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 9757–9766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083074</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Zaron and Elipot(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaron, E. D. and Elipot, S.: An assessment of global ocean barotropic tide
models using geodetic mission altimetry and surface drifters, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 51, 63–82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-20-0089.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-20-0089.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Zhai et al.(2010)Zhai, Johnson, and Marshall</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhai, X., Johnson, H. L., and Marshall, D. P.: Significant sink of ocean-eddy
energy near western boundaries, Nat. Geosci., 3, 608–612,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo943" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo943</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Zhang et al.(2024)Zhang, Yu, Ponte, Caspar-Cohen, Le Gentil, Wang,
and Gong</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, X., Yu, X., Ponte, A. L., Caspar-Cohen, Z., Le Gentil, S., Wang, L., and
Gong, W.: Lagrangian Versus Eulerian Spectral Estimates of Surface Kinetic
Energy Over the Global Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 129,
e2024JC021057, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021057</a>,   2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
