<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-19-1965-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>RADIv2: an adaptable and versatile diagenetic model for coastal and open-ocean sediments</article-title><alt-title>RADIv2</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>van der Zant</surname><given-names>Hinne F.</given-names></name>
          <email>hinne.van_der_zant@univ-lr.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2568-8653</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Sulpis</surname><given-names>Olivier</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6463-3320</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Middelburg</surname><given-names>Jack J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3601-9072</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Humphreys</surname><given-names>Matthew P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9371-7128</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Savelli</surname><given-names>Raphaël</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Carroll</surname><given-names>Dustin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Menemenlis</surname><given-names>Dimitris</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9940-8409</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Sušelj</surname><given-names>Kay</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Le Fouest</surname><given-names>Vincent</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4295-9714</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>LIttoral, Environnement et SociétéS (LIENSs) – UMR 7266, CNRS-La Rochelle Université, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges, La Rochelle, 17000, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CEREGE, Technopole Environnement Arbois-Méditerranée BP 80 13545 Aix-en-Provence, CEDEX 04, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Utrecht University, Department of Earth Sciences, Princetonlaan 8A, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Department of Ocean Systems (OCS), P.O. Box 59,  1790 AB Den Burg (Texel), the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, La Cañada Flintridge, CA 91011, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, San José State University, 8272 Moss Landing Road Moss Landing, CA 95039, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hinne F. van der Zant (hinne.van_der_zant@univ-lr.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>1965</fpage><lpage>1989</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>May</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>August</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Hinne F. van der Zant et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e193">Ocean biogeochemistry is being altered by anthropogenic processes such as warming, acidification, eutrophication, and deoxygenation. Global-ocean biogeochemistry models are essential for investigating present and projecting future conditions, yet they often lack detailed representations of seafloor processes, despite the seafloor’s important role in material exchange between the biosphere and geosphere. To improve the representation of exchange across the sediment-water interface, we present RADIv2, a flexible and computationally efficient diagenetic model designed to simulate benthic biogeochemical processes across a range of marine environments, from coastal zones to abyssal plains. RADIv2 incorporates key features such as benthic methane cycling, a hydrodynamically controlled diffusive boundary layer thickness and porewater dispersion to the original RADI model, which enhance its ability to capture sediment-water exchange under varied environmental conditions. Using RADIv2, we develop and validate a regression-based metamodel that predicts benthic solute fluxes (oxygen, dissolved inorganic carbon, and alkalinity). This metamodel provides a universal and computationally efficient alternative to full-complexity coupled water column-sediment biogeochemical models at the global scale. Ultimately, this approach improves the representation of global biogeochemical cycles in ocean models by improving the parameterization of sediment-water exchange.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Caisse des dépôts et consignations</funding-source>
<award-id>n/a</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Conseil Régional Aquitaine</funding-source>
<award-id>25875420</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Horizon 2020</funding-source>
<award-id>101081357</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>Engineering Research Centers</funding-source>
<award-id>101162777</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>National Aeronautics and Space Administration</funding-source>
<award-id>n/a</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e205">The cycling of key elements within marine environments plays a critical role in regulating Earth's climate and supporting marine ecosystems. However, biogeochemical cycles in the ocean are currently subject to a number of alterations driven by human activities. Ocean warming affects most biogeochemical processes both directly, by influencing factors such as reaction rates and gas solubility, and indirectly, through ecosystem and circulation changes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.1"/>. Ocean acidification, driven by increased atmospheric carbon dioxide uptake, lowers seawater pH and alters carbonate chemistry, with cascading effects on marine organisms and geochemical cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.2"/>. Eutrophication, largely caused by anthropogenic nutrient inputs from rivers, has intensified due to a three- to fourfold increase in dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus export between 1900 and 2010 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.3"/>. Excessive nutrient loading disrupts coastal ecosystems by fueling harmful algal blooms, hypoxia, and coastal acidification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.4"/>. Deoxygenation results from both ocean warming, which reduces oxygen solubility and ventilation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.5"/>, and eutrophication-driven oxygen depletion, leading to the expansion of oxygen minimum zones and coastal hypoxia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e227">Despite global efforts to mitigate the effects of climate change, this pressure is set to increase further in the coming decades <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.7"/>. Additionally, the ability of the ocean to sequester anthropogenic carbon dioxide over long timescales has given it a prominent role in proposed marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) strategies, such as enhancing organic carbon burial and ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.8"/>. However, the biogeochemical impacts of these activities, as well as the responses of marine and benthic environments to future climate change trajectories, are not fully understood.</p>
      <p id="d2e236">The seafloor, covering 70 % of Earth’s surface, plays a fundamental role in biogeochemical cycling, affecting oxygen consumption in the deep ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx105" id="paren.9"/> and accounting for approximately half of global oceanic denitrification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.10"/> and calcium carbonate dissolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.11"/>. Despite this importance, the processes impacting particles, mineralization, and the exchange of solutes and solids at the sediment-water interface (SWI) are often oversimplified or completely absent in global-ocean biogeochemistry models (GOBMs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx109 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx122" id="paren.12"/>. These simplifications limit our ability to simulate global biogeochemical cycles and compute carbon budgets that align with observations over longer timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="paren.13"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e254">The wide range of published diagenetic models illustrates the complex nature of benthic biogeochemical processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.14"/>. Marine sediments are highly heterogeneous, exhibiting variability in composition, rheology, hydrodynamics, and biology across spatial and temporal scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.15"/>. Coastal sediments, for example, experience higher biological activity and greater hydrodynamic forcing compared to deep-sea environments. Moreover, they receive high organic matter fluxes from different sources and are subject to strong temporal variability and seasonality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.16"/>. This spatial and temporal variability in coastal diagenetic processes necessitates high model resolution, increasing computational cost. Deep-sea environments, while more stable, present different challenges. Organic matter fluxes are lower and the organic matter is less reactive, physical transport processes (bioturbation, bioirrigation, and advection) are weaker, and redox reactions occur over longer timescales. While this allows for coarser model resolution, it also requires accurate representation of slower diagenetic processes, such as carbonate dissolution and long-term burial. Furthermore, sediment properties, including composition (organic matter content, mineralogy), permeability, rheological properties (permeability), bottom-water hydrodynamics (bottom currents, wave action), and benthic biology (bioturbation and bioirrigation) modulate fluxes at the sediment-water interface.</p>
      <p id="d2e267">Given this complexity, a one-size-fits-all modeling approach remains difficult to achieve across diverse marine environments. This lack of universal constraints limits the transferability of diagenetic models across different marine environments. This is particularly restrictive in regions with limited in situ data for validation and input, as well as in large-scale applications. Several generic diagenetic models have been developed to simulate seafloor processes at broader spatial scales. Entirely kinetic models, such as OMEXDIA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="paren.17"/>, are computationally efficient because they only solve reaction rates, and do not explicitly account for equilibrium constraints such as acid-base buffering, carbonate chemistry, and mineral dissolution/precipitation. More complex generic diagenetic models, such as CANDI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.18"/>, STEADYSED <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113" id="paren.19"/>, MUDS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.20"/> and MEDIA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.21"/>, incorporate both kinetic and equilibrium reactions, requiring additional computational resources.</p>
      <p id="d2e285">In this paper, we present RADIv2, an efficient and versatile diagenetic model that builds on RADIv1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.22"/>, originally developed for deep-sea sediments. RADIv2 improves computational efficiency and extends applicability to both coastal and deep-ocean environments. Like RADIv1, it integrates organic matter degradation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.23"/> with a diffusive boundary layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.24"/> and non-linear parameterization of CaCO<sub>3</sub> dissolution kinetics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx86" id="paren.25"/>. Additionally, RADIv2 incorporates dispersive solute transport, a dynamically varying diffusive boundary layer (DBL) thickness driven by bottom-water hydrodynamics, and diagenetic reactions associated with methane cycling. The model is implemented in Julia, a free, open-source programming language that enables improved computational efficiency through just-in-time compilation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.26"/>. RADIv2 supports both steady-state and non-steady-state simulations and includes an ensemble simulation framework for constraining variable or unconstrained model parameters. Steady states can be obtained either by calling the steady-state solvers in the DifferentialEquations.jl framework or by time-integrating the transient system until a user-defined convergence criterion is met. Another advantage of this framework is its ability to represent model outputs as statistical ranges rather than single values, better reflecting the natural variability observed in in situ measurements over time. These features facilitate its application across diverse marine environments, ranging from stable deep-sea sediments to dynamic coastal settings.</p>
      <p id="d2e313">To further improve sediment representation in global ocean biogeochemistry models (GOBMs), we use RADIv2 to create a novel regression-based metamodel designed to predict fluxes across the SWI for key solutes linked to the ocean carbon cycle (oxygen, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), total alkalinity (TA)), based on bottom-water temperature, current speed, calcite saturation state, and the deposition rates of particulate organic matter (POM) and particulate inorganic carbon (PIC). The metamodel is tuned and validated across diverse marine environments, ensuring applicability over a wide range of settings. By accounting for the heterogeneity and variability in sediment properties, environmental conditions and bottom-water chemistry, it provides a globally-applicable solution for improving sediment representation in ocean models. This approach avoids the need for computationally-expensive full-complexity sediment-ocean coupling, enabling the integration of benthic-pelagic interactions in a computationally-efficient manner.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model framework</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Transport equations</title>
      <p id="d2e338">RADIv2 builds on the transport equations and sediment processes implemented in RADIv1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.27"/>, which follow the framework established by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.28"/>. These reactive-transport equations describe the rate of change of a solid or solute, providing a budget equation that computes the net contribution by the different transport mechanisms: biogeochemical reactions, advection, diffusion and irrigation (solutes). For each solute component, the reactive-transport partial differential equation is

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M2" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            and for each solid component,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M3" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the concentrations of solutes and solids in mol per cubic meter of water and in mol per cubic meter of solid, respectively [mol m<sup>−3</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is time [a], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the porosity of the sediment [m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solid-volume fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) [m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective molecular diffusion coefficient [m<sup>2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bioturbation coefficient [m<sup>2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sediment depth [m], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the pore water burial velocity [m a<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solid burial velocity [m a<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the irrigation coefficient [a<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bottom-water solute concentration [mol m<sup>−3</sup>] and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the net reaction rate of all biogeochemical reactions for solid or solute [mol m<sup>−3</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>]. The SWI is set at a sediment depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the bottom layer is set at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Within these limits, the sediment is vertically discretized with a user-defined depth resolution, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e844">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> summarizes the reactions, reaction rates, and stoichiometric relationships implemented in RADIv2, adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.29"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.30"/>. A more detailed description of the processes and parameters is available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.31"/>. The stoichiometric ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the nitrogen-to-carbon and phosphorus-to-carbon ratios in organic matter, respectively. By default, the model applies a Redfield ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.32"/>, but these values can be adjusted to location-specific conditions or organic matter input sources. The degradation rate constants <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describe the breakdown of fast- and slow-degrading organic matter. These rate constants are not fixed globally; they exhibit variability depending on the source and composition of organic matter and they are typically adjusted to represent the specific conditions of each modeled environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.33"/>. The rate constants for the fast and slow organic carbon pools can be specified directly by the user, for example based on literature values or in-situ measurements, or they can be diagnosed from the empirical flux relationship used in RADIv1 (tuned for deep-sea settings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.34"/>). A refractory organic carbon pool is also included in the model structure, but its reactivity is set to zero by default, so it does not remineralize. The refractory fraction can be prescribed as a user-defined fraction of the incoming POM rain, in which case it affects sediment burial rates (computed from the total particulate rain to the sediments) and the bulk carbon content of the sediment column.</p>
      <p id="d2e937">The rate constants for the redox reactions in RADIv2 are uniform globally and are described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.35"/> and the references therein. The dissolution rate constants for calcite and aragonite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>diss. Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>diss. ar</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) control the dissolution dynamics of these carbonates, while the precipitation rate constant for calcite regulates the rate of calcite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>prec. Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) formation through precipitation. RADIv2 uses the same carbonate dissolution–precipitation scheme as RADIv1, non-linear kinetics for both calcite and aragonite dissolution described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.36"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.37"/>. The terms <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>MnO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Fe(OH)</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, represent the fractions of organic carbon degraded by each respective available oxidant. Oxidant limitation and interactions between pathways are modeled using widely applied Michaelis–Menten-type functions, which account for the influence of oxidant availability and the potential for certain oxidants to inhibit alternative metabolic pathways <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx95" id="paren.38"/>. This approach ensures that the model captures the overlapping and dynamic nature of these processes across the sediment depth. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantifies the net change in total alkalinity associated with each reaction. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the sum of dissolved inorganic carbon produced or consumed during the reactions.</p>
      <p id="d2e1079">It is important to note that the reactions presented in Table 1 reflect how they are handled within RADIv2, rather than their canonical representations. RADIv2 does not explicitly solve for H<sup>+</sup> concentrations; instead, the model tracks DIC and TA, indirectly approximating the proton balance. The proton balance is estimated using a single Newton-Raphson iteration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.39"/>. Consequently, reactions are expressed in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> and HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to align with model handling of DIC and TA, even though these species may not appear in the canonical representations of the reactions.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1119">Summary of reactions, reaction rates, and stoichiometric relationships implemented in RADIv2. The table includes degradation rates for organic matter, dissolution and precipitation rate constants for carbonates, and the fractions of organic carbon degraded by different oxidants, along with their impact on alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon concentrations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="8.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="3.7cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reaction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rate [mM a<sup>−1</sup>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TA</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="left">Organic matter degradation </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>MnO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Mn</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>MnO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>fast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>slow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="left">Redox reactions </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Mn</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>MnO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Mn</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Mn</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>HCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>HS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CH</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="left">CaCO<sub>3</sub> dissolution and precipitation </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Calcite</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>diss. Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Aragonite</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>diss. ar</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ar</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>CaCO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>prec. Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>Method of lines and transport mechanisms</title>
      <p id="d2e3519">At present time, DifferentialEquations.jl only solves Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs); however, the fundamental transport equations (Eqs. 1 and 2) are partial differential equations (PDEs) in both time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The Method of Lines (MOL) numerical technique was employed to transform the transport PDEs into a system of ODEs compatible with DifferentialEquations.jl version v7.14.0. This is achieved by discretizing the spatial domain into finite depth intervals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while keeping time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a continuous variable. The sediment column is divided into these discrete depth intervals and the rate of change in solute concentrations over time is computed for each depth segment, following the approach described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.40"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3562">To approximate the spatial derivatives of concentration profiles, a central difference approach is applied to the transport equations. This numerical method estimates spatial derivatives by evaluating concentration differences at two points on either side of a reference point (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and assumes the concentration profile between points is approximately linear over small intervals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3582">For a concentration profile (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, representing either a solute or solid concentration), the central difference approximation for second-order derivatives at point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M122" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            and a backward difference scheme for first-order derivatives:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M123" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e3742">Using this central difference approach, (bio)diffusion is computed as follows:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M124" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (solute concentration) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (solid concentration). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [m<sup>2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>] denotes the effective diffusion coefficient for solutes and the bioturbation mixing rate for solids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The bioturbation mixing rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is empirically based on a 53-site data set compiled by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.41"/> ranging from the deep sea to the shelves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.42"/>.

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M133" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4054">where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface bioturbation rate, calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02328</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.43"/>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the incoming particulate organic carbon rain, converted from POM according to OM stoichiometry. The characteristic depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.44"/> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [mol m<sup>−3</sup>] is the oxygen concentration of bottom waters.</p>
      <p id="d2e4168">Advection is calculated as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M140" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>advection</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>solute</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>solid</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4558">The term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the effective advection term, which is modified by additional corrections to account for changes in porosity, tortuosity, and bioturbation gradients. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [m<sup>2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>] is the “free-solution” molecular diffusion coefficient for a solute and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [–] is the depth-dependent tortuosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>ln</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.45"/>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [–] parameterizes influence of advection relative to bioturbation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.46"/>. The parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is introduced for the advective transport of solids because a more sophisticated numerical approach is needed when biodiffusion diminishes at depth within the sediment column. Under these conditions, the central difference scheme becomes unstable when applied to advective (burial) terms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.47"/>. A weighted difference scheme developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.48"/> is employed, that introduces the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>tanh⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which represents half of the cell Peclet number (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and measures the relative influence of advection compared to biodiffusion over a given depth interval. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, biodiffusion dominates, whereas when  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, advection becomes the primary transport mechanism. The scheme transitions from a centered-difference approach under diffusion-dominant conditions to a backward-difference approach when advection dominates, and ensures numerical stability even as biodiffusion approaches zero <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.49"/>. This correction is not applied to solutes, where advection dominance is uncommon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.50"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4843">The mixing of solutes caused by burrow flushing or ventilation occurs through multiple processes that are collectively termed irrigation, which is computed as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M155" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an irrigation coefficient, approximating an ensemble of biological processes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solute concentration in the bottom waters and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration at depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.51"/> derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile based on a 53-site dataset compiled by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.52"/>, ranging from deep sea to shelves, expressing the irrigation coefficient as a function of the organic carbon deposition flux and the oxygen concentration of the overlaying water:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M161" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e5121">The per-depth irrigation coefficient follows:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M162" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where the characteristic depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 5 cm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.53"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5180">The contribution of biogeochemical reactions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are summarized in Table 1.</p>
      <p id="d2e5194">At the sediment–water interface, RADIv2 allows for prescribed solid fluxes and regulates solute exchange through a diffusive boundary layer. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.54"/>, advection and diffusion at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both solutes and solids are calculated as follows:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M166" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            and

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M167" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            respectively. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are imaginary concentrations used to solve transport across the SWI. For solutes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the thickness of the DBL [m], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solute concentration in the well-mixed overlaying waters [mol m<sup>−3</sup>], and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solute concentration at the SWI [mol m<sup>−3</sup>]. For solids, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particulate deposition flux at the SWI [mol m<sup>2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solid burial velocity at the SWI [a<sup>−1</sup>], and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particulate concentration at the SWI [mol m<sup>−3</sup>].</p>
      <p id="d2e5518">The bottom boundary condition is characterized by a “no-gradient” constraint, meaning that the concentration remains constant at the boundary:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M182" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (solute concentration) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (solid concentration), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the boundary of the modeled sediment domain, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration outside of the sediment domain, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the deepest depth interval within the modeled sediment domain.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Additions to RADIv2</title>
      <p id="d2e5629">RADIv1 was designed for deep-sea sediments and does not account for methane or solute transport by bottom-water hydrodynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.55"/>. In RADIv2, we added methane  to address its role in sediment biogeochemistry, particularly in coastal regions where methane formation and release can play a larger role compared to the deep sea. In coastal and shelf environments, hydrodynamic properties are highly variable and can influence key transport mechanisms, such as the thickness of the DBL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.56"/> and enhanced porewater diffusivity through dispersion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.57"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Diffusive boundary layer thickness</title>
      <p id="d2e5648">In RADIv1, the DBL thickness was prescribed as a fixed value. However, in reality, it varies with bottom-water hydrodynamics and differs by solute due to their distinct molecular diffusion rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx123 bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.58"/>. The DBL thickness is primarily controlled by bottom-water currents, ranging from tens of microns in high-energy environments (e.g., coastal areas and rivers) to several millimeters in the low-energy deep sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="paren.59"/>. The benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake of coastal sediments can fluctuate by more than 30 % within hours or days, driven by variations in the thickness of the DBL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.60"/>. To account for this, a hydrodynamic- and solute-dependent DBL thickness is implemented in RADIv2, following the combined approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="text.61"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.62"/>.  The vertical velocity profile of bottom-water currents is approximated using the Law of the Wall (LOW) equation used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="text.63"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M190" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bottom-water current velocity [m s<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the von Karman constant (0.40) [unitless], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the friction velocity [m s<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the kinematic viscosity of seawater [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is an empirical dimensionless constant with a value of 5.1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.64"/>. The Coriolis parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], a value representative of mid-latitudes. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is latitude-dependent, varying as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the latitude and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2921</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rad s<sup>−1</sup> is the Earth's angular velocity. It is zero at the equator (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and reaches a maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<sup>−1</sup> at the poles ((<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)). To assess the sensitivity of bottom-water current velocity to variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we recalculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for latitudes ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, keeping the kinematic viscosity of seawater (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) constant at 10<sup>−6</sup> m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.1 m s<sup>−1</sup>. The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were 6.38 m s<sup>−1</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 5.54 m s<sup>−1</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 5.40 m s<sup>−1</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and 5.37 m s<sup>−1</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These results show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stabilizes at higher latitudes but increases significantly near the equator due to the near-zero Coriolis parameter. Future work could improve this parameterization by explicitly incorporating latitude dependence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), enhancing the model’s applicability across diverse geographic regions.</p>
      <p id="d2e6200">Figure 1a presents the empirical relationship between the kinematic viscosity of seawater (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bottom-water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in °C), derived by fitting data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.65"/>. The resulting linear equation is:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M234" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e6262">By substituting this empirical relation for (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Eq. 15) into Eq. (14), we obtain an equation linking bottom current speeds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), bottom-water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and friction velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This relationship, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 40 °C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> up to 1.1 m s<sup>−1</sup>, is depicted in Fig. 1b and is expressed in Eq. (14) as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M242" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00136</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.19598542</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.35862843</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e6390">The mass transfer coefficient as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is approximated following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.66"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><label>17</label><mml:math id="M244" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e6444">where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass transfer coefficient [m a<sup>−1</sup>] and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dimensionless Schmidt coefficient, defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>] is the temperature-dependent molecular diffusion coefficient of the solute.</p>
      <p id="d2e6546">The DBL thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DBL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) [m] is obtained by dividing molecular diffusion coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by the the mass transfer coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="text.67"/> as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><label>18</label><mml:math id="M255" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DBL</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e6621"><bold>(a)</bold> Empirical relationship between kinematic viscosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bottom-water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), fitted to the original data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.68"/>. <bold>(b)</bold> Fitted friction velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of bottom-water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bottom-current speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to the original <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Pore water dispersion</title>
      <p id="d2e6697">In permeable sediments (permeability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<sup>2</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.69"/>), enhanced pore water diffusivity, or dispersion, is driven by flow interaction with bottom water topography, density and pressure gradients, and migrating sediment ripples and wave motion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.70"/>. The net effect on vertical transport can be represented as enhanced pore water diffusivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.71"/>, which is estimated as a function of shear velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), following the relation described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.72"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E19" content-type="numbered"><label>19</label><mml:math id="M265" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the apparent bulk sediment diffusivity (dispersion) [m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective diffusion coefficient, corrected for sediment tortuosity [m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a sediment-permeability-dependent fit parameter [s m<sup>−1</sup>] (set to 1, based on permeable sediments from the Wadden Sea and North Sea, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="altparen.73"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the von Kármán constant [–], and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the friction velocity [mm s<sup>−1</sup>].</p>
      <p id="d2e6936">For sediments with permeability below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<sup>2</sup>, dispersive transport is considered negligible <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.74"/>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to 0, such that, in the absence of advection, only molecular diffusion governs solute transport. For permeable sediments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<sup>2</sup>), sediment dispersion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is incorporated as the effective diffusion coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in solute transport equations (Eqs. 3 and 5), accounting for both diffusion and advection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Numerical methods and computational enhancements</title>
      <p id="d2e7051">The original RADIv1 framework used a forward Euler method to solve fundamental transport equations, which requires user-defined time and depth steps that must adhere to a specific ratio to ensure numerical stability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.75"/>. However, in coastal environments with steep solute gradients between porewater and bottom waters, as well as high microbial activity, this numerical scheme can become unstable and computationally inefficient. Capturing the complexity of sediment processes requires sufficient vertical discretization, which increases computational demand. RADIv1 and RADIv2 are the first diagenetic models built using DifferentialEquations.jl, a high-performance and modular Julia package for solving differential equations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.76"/>. Coastal sediments may require higher-order stiff solvers with fine-tuned tolerance settings to ensure numerical stability while maintaining computational efficiency. In contrast, deep-sea environments, where geochemical processes evolve over longer timescales with more gradual changes, can be simulated using computationally-efficient solvers that prioritize stability over high temporal resolution. RADIv2 allows users to configure solver options, including time-stepping strategies, stiffness detection, and convergence criteria, based on the specific characteristics of the sediment environment being simulated. Additionally, DifferentialEquations.jl integrates with Julia’s multi-threading and multiprocessing capabilities, allowing RADIv2 to handle computationally-intensive tasks, such as ensemble simulations, with reduced runtime. Users can define the number of trajectories and specify parameters for each trajectory individually, either by explicitly setting values or randomizing them within predefined ranges. This ensemble approach enables a more-comprehensive exploration of model behavior, particularly in cases where input parameters are uncertain or highly variable. Instead of relying on single-point estimates, users can systematically vary key input parameters such as organic matter flux, bottom-water temperature, and calcite saturation state within defined ranges. This flexibility is especially useful in coastal environments, where such parameters exhibit significant spatial and temporal variability. Additionally, this capability can be used to constrain unknown parameters by comparing simulation results with observational data. The resulting model outputs form an envelope of potential outcomes that aligns well with in situ data, which is also typically reported as ranges due to variability within measurement periods.</p>
      <p id="d2e7060">Building upon an open-source programming language, RADIv2 leverages Julia’s flexibility to integrate external packages, including optimization frameworks. One such package, BlackBoxOptim.jl <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.77"/>, provides an efficient, derivative-free approach to parameter tuning. This heuristic optimization algorithm employs an adaptive gradient strategy, beginning with broader exploratory steps before refining its search space for improved convergence. This adaptability ensures optimization across a wide range of environmental conditions while minimizing the risk of becoming trapped in local minima. By incorporating BlackBoxOptim.jl, RADIv2 allows users to fine-tune model parameters to align with observational data. This feature is particularly useful for constraining the best fit to observations for highly variable or unknown model parameters. RADIv2 includes an example script demonstrating how to optimize key parameters (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18386461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18386461</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="altparen.78"/>). This script serves as a practical guide, showcasing how users can refine model outputs to match empirical data. Furthermore, this optimization framework can be extended beyond the examples provided, allowing users to fine-tune any model parameter to improve representation across different marine environments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>2.2.4</label><title>Performance of RADIv2 versus RADIv1</title>
      <p id="d2e7081">Here we present a quantitative benchmark comparison of RADIv2 versus RADIv1. To keep the comparison as direct as possible, we re-ran the deep-sea Southern Pacific case (input file IC_SM7) from the original RADIv1 paper with both model versions, using comparable physics (no dispersion, constant DBL, identical forcing and boundary conditions). All timings reported below are for a single CPU core.</p>
      <p id="d2e7084">For a 50-year spin-up, RADIv1 required 5 min and 20 s, whereas RADIv2 (using the Rosenbrock23 stiff solver with a sparse KLU linear solver, abstol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and reltol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) completed in 40 s.</p>
      <p id="d2e7127">For a 2000-year integration of the same set-up, RADIv1 required <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hours and 30 min, while RADIv2 completed in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 min.</p>
      <p id="d2e7147">When the additional physics implemented in RADIv2 are activated (species- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent DBL thickness and dispersion) for the same 2000-year run, the wall-clock time remains of the same order, at 28 min and 30 s. Thus, the added physical realism does not make the system substantially more expensive.</p>
      <p id="d2e7158">The main performance gain comes from the stiff ODE integrator (Rosenbrock23) with adaptive time-stepping combined with a sparse linear solver (KLU). RADIv1 uses a forward Euler scheme with a constant time step, forcing the model to continue using this small step even after the solution is close to steady state. RADIv2's adaptive time-stepping takes many small steps initially, then increases the time step once the system has largely equilibrated. Moreover, using a sparse factorization like KLU stores and operates only on the non-zero entries of the Jacobian, which reduces both memory use and computation, so stiff simulations can run faster.</p>
      <p id="d2e7161">The DifferentialEquations.jl solve function scales the local error estimate as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M290" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">err</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scaled</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">err</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>abstol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>reltol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">prev</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">prev</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the solution values before and after the step <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.79"/>. For typical state-variable magnitudes in this study (roughly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to mol m<sup>−3</sup>), the relative term dominates and the local error scale is approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>reltol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while abstol provides a hard absolute scale for very small concentrations. For example, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol m<sup>−3</sup> the scale is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.001</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol m<sup>−3</sup> (about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol m<sup>−3</sup> it is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol m<sup>−3</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). When concentrations are very small, the absolute term prevents the tolerated error scale from dropping below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We consider this sub-percent tolerance scale for typical concentrations acceptable for equilibrium benthic fluxes, as uncertainties in boundary conditions, parameter values, and process representations tend to be larger than the error of the solver.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS5">
  <label>2.2.5</label><title>Methane</title>
      <p id="d2e7519">In RADIv1, methane, a potent greenhouse gas, was not included as a modeled solute due to its limited role in deep-sea sediments. Methane is produced in anoxic sediment layers through methanogenesis, a fermentation process that occurs once electron acceptors – such as oxygen, nitrate, and sulfate – are depleted. This pathway is primarily relevant in coastal and continental shelf sediments, where high organic matter flux supports rapid sulfate consumption and creates conditions favorable to methane production. In contrast, deep-sea sediments rarely reach the methanogenic zone due to lower organic matter fluxes and sufficient availability of favorable electron acceptors. Once formed, methane is largely consumed within the sediment by microbial oxidation before reaching the overlying water column. The primary sink for methane is anaerobic oxidation, facilitated by sulfate-reducing bacteria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.80"/>. Aerobic oxidation can also occur near the sediment-water interface where oxygen is present, though it is typically a less significant pathway. Approximately 80 % of methane oxidation occurs in continental shelf sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.81"/>. However, recent studies suggest that anaerobic oxidation of methane does not become substantially more efficient with warming, whereas warming can enhance methane production within the sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.82"/>. As a result, a larger fraction of climate-driven seafloor methane production may bypass the sedimentary filter and reach the water column. The inclusion of methane in RADIv2 enables explicit simulation of methane production and oxidation pathways, providing a framework to assess how changing environmental conditions may influence benthic methane cycling and seafloor seepage.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Model validation</title>
      <p id="d2e7541">Benthic-pelagic coupling plays a fundamental role in ocean biogeochemistry, influencing carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, and climate regulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="paren.83"/>. To assess how well RADIv2 represents this coupling, we apply the model to six marine environments: the North Sea, Monterey Bay, the shallow Iberian margin, the deep Iberian margin, and two deep-sea stations in the Arabian Sea. These sites span a range of sedimentary and hydrodynamic conditions, from productive coastal systems to deep-sea settings. Because observations and simulations are not always fully paired in space or forcing (not all parameters or boundary conditions are available to constrain RADIv2) and sample sizes differ, we use a Welch two-sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119" id="paren.84"/> to evaluate whether the mean modelled flux differs significantly from the mean of the observations. To account for the strong spatial heterogeneity of benthic fluxes, we also quantify the fraction of simulated values that fall within the “bulk” observational interquartile range (25 %–75 %) and within the broader 5 %–95 % observational envelope. Together, these diagnostics provide a joint measure of systematic bias (over- or underestimation) and of how well the modelled fluxes remain within the range documented in the literature.</p>
      <p id="d2e7557">The benthic flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of a given solute across the SWI is driven by the concentration gradient across the DBL and follows the formulation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.85"/>:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E20" content-type="numbered"><label>20</label><mml:math id="M312" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [mol m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>] is the benthic solute flux, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>] is the porosity at the SWI, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [m<sup>2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>] is the effective diffusion coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [mol m<sup>−3</sup>] and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [mol m<sup>−3</sup>] are solute concentrations at the SWI and in the bottom waters, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [m] is the thickness of the DBL.</p>
      <p id="d2e7782">To account for environmental variability, we performed ensemble simulations with RADIv2 in which five key parameters are varied: bottom-water temperature, current velocity, calcium saturation state, and the fluxes of particulate organic and inorganic carbon to the seafloor. For each site, the calcium carbonate state is computed from total alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon using the CO2SYS carbonate-chemistry routine <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.86"/>, which solves the carbonate system with standard equilibrium constants and calcite/aragonite solubility products following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.87"/> and applies pressure corrections following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.88"/>. The CO2System.jl module is available on <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6395674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6395674</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.89"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7800">These factors were selected because they are fundamental drivers of benthic hydrodynamics, organic matter degradation, and calcite dissolution. The same ensemble of RADIv2 fluxes forms the basis for the metamodel introduced in the next section. In addition, we illustrate the performance of RADIv2 for resolving depth profiles of porewater composition at a coastal margin station on the Iberian Margin (Sect. S1, Fig. S1 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d2e7804">Table 2 summarizes the key model parameters used in the ensemble runs. All run files and input files are publicly available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18386461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18386461</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="paren.90"/>. Ensemble simulations were integrated with the stiff Rosenbrock23 solver to steady state, using adaptive time stepping and a sparse linear solver. Dissolved species equilibrate on time scales of years to decades, whereas particulate organic matter adjusts more slowly as it is buried. We therefore defined steady state by requiring that the maximum change in depth-integrated solid organic carbon (fast <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> slow pools) over the final 5 years of integration was less than 10<sup>−3</sup> mmol m<sup>−3</sup> across the full depth of the sediment column. Although all calibration experiments in this study are run to steady state, RADIv2 also supports transient simulations with time-dependent boundary conditions and forcings. A dedicated example with tidal current variability and seasonal plankton-bloom forcing is presented in the Sect. S2 in the Supplement. In all configurations used in this study, we employ a uniform vertical grid with a spacing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. A sensitivity test for different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the Iberian Margin coastal is presented in Sect. S1 in the Supplement.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e7882">Model parameters for the six marine environments. The five varying parameters are bottom-water temperature, current speed, bottom-water calcite saturation state (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), particulate organic matter flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and calcite flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fast</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">slow</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) represent the degradation rate constants for fast- and slow-degrading organic matter, respectively, while (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fast</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">slow</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) denote the corresponding fractions of each organic matter type. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated from environmental parameters using CO2SYS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.91"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Monterey</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Iberian margin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Iberian margin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Arabian Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Arabian Sea</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Bay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(shallow)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(deep)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(WAST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(SAST)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of Runs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Run time [a]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature [°C]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.0–13.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.0–8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.7–12.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5–11.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0–4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.0–4.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Current velocity [m s<sup>−1</sup>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02–0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05–0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02–0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01–0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02–0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02–0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [–]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.5–4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5–5.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.13–4.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.6–4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.1–2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.98–1.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [g m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80.0–170.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">70–140</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.0–55.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.8–28.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.0–66.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.0–12.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [mol m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4–1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2–0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2–0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05–0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1–0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.1–0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fast</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [a<sup>−1</sup>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">21.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">slow</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [a<sup>−1</sup>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.032</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fast</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [%]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">slow</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [%]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth [m]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.5–683.313</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">104–391</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">895–4941</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4420</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>North Sea</title>
      <p id="d2e8514">Figure 2a shows the fluxes simulated by RADIv2 alongside a comparison with values reported in the literature. For North Sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, the model shows a positive bias (mean 13.8 vs 10.9 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>; Welch <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): one third of the simulated values fall within the observational 25 %–75 % range, while all lie within the 5 %–95 % observational envelope. For DIC, the model substantially overestimates the observed fluxes (mean 16.8 vs 8.9 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>; Welch <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3  % of simulated values within the observational 25 %–75 % range and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 % within the 5 %–95 % range, indicating that most model values exceed the bulk of observed variability. For North Sea TA fluxes, modelled and observed values overlap: all simulated fluxes fall within both the observational 25 %–75 % and 5 %–95 % ranges, and the Welch test (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) does not indicate a significant systematic bias, suggesting no model offset for TA.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e8639">Comparison of simulated benthic solute fluxes and POC remineralization rates with values reported in the literature. <bold>(a)</bold> Simulated RADIv2 benthic solute fluxes for the North Sea compared to published values. Box–whisker plots compare the distribution of RADIv2 fluxes (“RADIv2”) with observational and modelled site means (“Obs”) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx116 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx112 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx118 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx114" id="altparen.92"/>). The box spans the interquartile range (25 %–75 %), and the whiskers extend to the 5 %–95 % range. The solid orange horizontal line indicates the median, the green dashed line indicates the mean, and coloured jittered dots show individual observations. Negative O<sub>2</sub> fluxes correspond to uptake of oxygen by the sediment. <bold>(b)</bold> POC remineralization rates and percentage of remineralization in different shelf environments. <sup>a</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="text.93"/>; <sup>b</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.94"/>; <sup>c</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.95"/>; <sup>d</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.96"/>; <sup>e</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.97"/>; <sup>f</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.98"/>; <sup>g</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.99"/>; <sup>h</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.100"/>; <sup>i</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.101"/>; <sup>j</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="text.102"/>; <sup>k</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.103"/>; <sup>l</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.104"/>; </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e8814">The simulated DIC fluxes for the North Sea are higher than the literature range. This likely reflects a combination of too strong organic-matter supply and too reactive organic-matter parameters in our set-up. The imposed POM rain is based on annual-mean export estimates, which smooth over episodic blooms and short-lived pulses and can therefore misrepresent the supply at the time of the benthic flux measurements. Combined with highly reactive incoming OM, most degradation occurs near the sediment–water interface and drives larger DIC fluxes (and slightly elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake) than those inferred from the local measurements and modelling studies. Moreover, the model produces narrower flux ranges compared to in-situ measurements. This discrepancy can be attributed to the steady-state nature of the simulations, which do not account for transient variations such as temperature, tidal oscillations and internal waves. Internal waves, including their breaking counterparts, can induce sediment resuspension <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.105"/>, which in turn affects benthic fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.106"/> and influences the benthic boundary layer through turbulence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.107"/>. Tidal cycles can also introduce substantial short-term variability in fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.108"/>. These dynamic processes, which are not captured by steady-state simulations, can lead to significant fluctuations in solute and particulate fluxes across the sediment-water interface, particularly in coastal regions where wave action and tidal forcing are more pronounced.</p>
      <p id="d2e8841">The modeled remineralization rates (Fig. 2b) are within the same order of magnitude than those observed in continental shelf environments, although they exceed observations from the North Sea. This positive bias is consistent with the combination of relatively high imposed organic-matter supply and reactive organic-matter parameters discussed above. The relative contributions of aerobic and anaerobic remineralization in RADIv2 align with both reported values for North Sea sediments and typical continental shelf environments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.109"/> (Fig. 2b). This agreement indicates that RADIv2 captures organic matter degradation pathways under varying redox conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Monterey Bay</title>
      <p id="d2e8855">For Monterey Bay (Fig. 3a), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes show good agreement between model and observations: the means are nearly identical (9.29 vs 9.11 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>), and no significant mean bias is detected (Welch <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Nearly all simulated values (97 %) fall within the observational 25 %–75 % range, and all lie within the 5 %–95 % envelope. For DIC, the predicts higher fluxes (mean 12.0 vs 9.95 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>), while the Welch test provides only marginal evidence for a mean difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), reflecting the small sample size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). About one third of simulated DIC values fall within the observational 25 %–75 % range and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 87 % within the 5 %–95 % envelope. TA fluxes agree closely (means 4.46 vs 4.35 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>; Welch <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with 63 % of model values inside the observational 25 %–75 % range and all within the 5 %–95 % envelope.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e9003">Comparison of simulated benthic solute fluxes and POC remineralization rates with values reported in the literature. <bold>(a)</bold> Simulated RADIv2 benthic solute fluxes for Monterey Bay compared to published values. Box–whisker plots compare the distribution of RADIv2 fluxes (“RADIv2”) with observational and modelled site means (“Obs”). The box spans the interquartile range (25 %–75 %), and the whiskers extend to the 5 %–95 % range. The solid orange horizontal line indicates the median, the green dashed line indicates the mean, and coloured jittered dots show individual observations. Negative O<sub>2</sub> fluxes correspond to uptake of oxygen by the sediment. <bold>(b)</bold> POC remineralization rates and percentage remineralized values for this study compared to Monterey Bay in-situ data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.110"/>. <sup>a</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.111"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e9043">The modest DIC bias likely reflects uncertainties in the imposed organic-matter supply and reactivity, while the comparatively narrow model spread in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with the steady-state nature of the simulations, which do not resolve short-term variability. Internal tides and associated internal-wave activity have been shown to significantly influence sediment dynamics in Monterey Bay <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.112"/>, but are not represented in the present set-up. RADIv2 simulates an organic matter remineralization rate for Monterey Bay that is approximately 2–3 times higher than observed rates (Fig. 3b). However, the values in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.113"/> are lower than the global-mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remineralization rate for continental shelf environments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 mmol C m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.114"/>). Because <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.115"/> did not measure POM rain to the seafloor directly, the POM flux range used in Table 2 was estimated by analogy with the North Sea calibration. This choice likely overestimates the actual organic-matter supply at Monterey Bay and contributes to the positive bias in the simulated remineralization rates. The relative contribution of aerobic and anaerobic organic matter pathways simulated by RADIv2 is consistent with values observed in other continental shelf studies (Fig. 3b) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.116"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Iberian Margin</title>
      <p id="d2e9123">The Iberian Margin validation uses data from five transects spanning a wide range of depths, as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.117"/>. Two input files were created: one for shallow locations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) and one for deeper locations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m). For the simulations, the average organic carbon decay rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">slow</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is constrained between 1.5 and 2.25 a<sup>−1</sup> (Table 2), based on high-resolution in-situ oxygen microprofiles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.118"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e9204">For the Iberian Margin (Fig. 4a), RADIv2 overestimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake at both stations. At the shallow site, the mean simulated flux is 4.38 vs 2.75 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>, and at the deep site 2.38 vs 1.07 mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>, with both Welch tests indicating a significant positive bias at each location (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively). At neither site do simulated values fall within the observational 25 %–75 % range, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37 % (shallow) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 % (deep) lie within the 5 %–95 % observational envelope. The model also overestimates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remineralization rates (Fig. 4b). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.119"/> already noted that the observed remineralization rates on the Iberian Margin are unexpectedly low given the high primary production in this region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7–11 mmol C m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>) and that they fall well below predicted values based on empirical relationships described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.120"/>. Shelf sediments off Peru exhibit rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mmol C m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.121"/>, and margin sediments off Chile, up to depths of 2000 m, show rates approximately 15 times higher <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx110" id="paren.122"/>. In our set-up, we adopt the export flux estimates from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.123"/> without additional site-specific tuning, so uncertainties in the effective POM supply at these stations likely contribute to the positive bias in RADIv2 remineralization rates. A dedicated comparison of simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> porewater profiles at station 99–6 is provided in Sect. S1 of the Supplement, where we also assess the sensitivity of these profiles and the associated fluxes to vertical resolution.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e9460">Comparison of simulated benthic solute fluxes and POC remineralization rates with values reported in the literature. <bold>(a)</bold> Simulated RADIv2 benthic solute fluxes for the Iberian Margin compared to published values. Box–whisker plots compare the distribution of RADIv2 fluxes (“RADIv2”) with observational and modelled site means (“Obs”). The box spans the interquartile range (25 %–75 %), and the whiskers extend to the 5 %–95 % range. The solid orange horizontal line indicates the median, the green dashed line indicates the mean, and coloured jittered dots show individual observations. Negative O<sub>2</sub> fluxes correspond to uptake of oxygen by the sediment. <bold>(b)</bold> POC remineralization rates and percentage remineralized values for this study compared to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.124"/>. <sup>a</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.125"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e9501">Although DIC fluxes were not directly measured in this study, they can be inferred from the modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx using the Respiratory Quotient (RQ), defined as the molar ratio of DIC production to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption during organic matter remineralization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.126"/>, RQ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This approach provides a practical means of evaluating DIC fluxes in the absence of direct in-situ measurements. Under idealized conditions, where organic matter is represented by redfield organic matter, CH<sub>2</sub>O, the RQ equals 1.0, reflecting a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stoichiometric ratio between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption and DIC production. However, re-evaluated marine phytoplankton composition lead to slightly lower RQ values, around 0.88–0.90 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.127"/>.  Some studies also account for additional oxygen-consuming processes, particularly nitrification, which further lowers RQ values <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="paren.128"/>. Additional variability in RQ can come from incomplete reoxidation due to losses of N<sub>2</sub> or burial of FeS<sub>2</sub>. FeS<sub>2</sub> can later be reoxidized through bioturbation-driven exposure to oxygen, further influencing oxygen demand and introducing additional variability in RQ in both directions. An empirical approach to deriving RQ values involves using in-situ measurements of benthic DIC efflux and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx. Flux-derived RQ values compiled by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.129"/> span a broad range, from 0.69 to 1.31. The variation from theoretical stoichiometry can be attributed to factors including carbonate dissolution, which enhances DIC fluxes without directly affecting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.130"/>, and the temporal decoupling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC fluxes during episodic organic matter deposition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.131"/>. RADIv2 simulates average flux-derived RQ values around 1.0 for both shallow and deep sites on the Iberian Margin. These values are consistent with the Redfield stoichiometry assumed in the model and fall well within the empirical range reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.132"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Arabian Sea</title>
      <p id="d2e9675">RADIv2 was validated using data from two deep-sea stations located in the Arabian Sea, WAST (4050 m depth) and SAST (4420 m depth), as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="text.133"/>. These stations were selected for validation due to their contrasting organic matter export fluxes, benthic carbon remineralization rates, and benthic oxygen fluxes. Because the number of available observations is low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we do not apply the statistical tests used for the other locations.</p>
      <p id="d2e9693">WAST is characterized by high benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, one of the highest recorded in global deep-sea environments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="paren.134"/>. This suggests that deep-sea sediments are not always stable, constant environments, but are influenced by variations in organic matter fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx121" id="paren.135"/>. The high benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is primarily driven by high particulate organic carbon (POC) rain rates of 1.38 mol m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>, resulting from monsoonal upwelling and lateral advection from the productive Arabian shelves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.136"/>. These elevated POM fluxes lead to relatively high benthic remineralization rates compared to other deep-sea sites, although RADIv2 simulates higher values than observed (Fig. 5b). Due to the higher POM rain, RADIv2 predicts aerobic benthic remineralization rates that align more closely with those observed in more shallow marine environments (Fig. 5b). As a result, the simulated aerobic remineralization percentages are higher than those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.137"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e9757">Comparison of simulated benthic solute fluxes and OM remineralization rates with values reported in the literature. <bold>(a)</bold> Simulated RADIv2 benthic solute fluxes for the Arabian Sea compared to published values. Box–whisker plots compare the distribution of RADIv2 fluxes (“RADIv2”) with observational and modelled site means (“Obs”). The box spans the interquartile range (25 %–75 %), and the whiskers extend to the 5 %–95 % range. The solid orange horizontal line indicates the median, the green dashed line indicates the mean, and coloured jittered dots show individual observations. Where available, the whiskers for the observations indicate the measured standard deviation. Negative O<sub>2</sub> fluxes correspond to uptake of oxygen by the sediment. <bold>(b)</bold> OM remineralization rates and percentage remineralized values for this study compared to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="text.138"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.139"/>. <sup>a</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="text.140"/>; <sup>b</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.141"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e9813">For SAST, located further from the shelf, the significantly lower POM rain rates lead to lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (Fig. 5a), more in line with typical deep-sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake values <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="paren.142"/>. Here, RADIv2 overestimates both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes and remineralization rates, though the model’s aerobic remineralization percentage are consistent with those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.143"/> (Fig. 5b).</p>
      <p id="d2e9855">As no DIC measurements were available for these stations, we inferred DIC fluxes using the flux-derived RQ in RADIv2. The simulated RQ is 1.25 for WAST and 1.13 for SAST. Both are higher than those simulated for the Iberian Margin, due to more calcium carbonate dissolution. The values fall within the broader range of RQ values derived from in-situ flux measurements reported for marine sediments by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.144"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Summary of RADIv2 performance against in-situ observations and published model–data estimates</title>
      <p id="d2e9869">The simulated ranges of solute fluxes in RADIv2 generally align with values found in the literature, although they are narrower. This narrowing likely results from the steady-state conditions employed in the simulations, which do not account for short-term variability, such as tidal and higher-frequency fluctuations. At some locations, RADIv2 shows a tendency to overestimate benthic fluxes, which likely reflect uncertainties in the prescribed POM supply and organic-matter degradation kinetics. For locations without observed DIC fluxes, the empirical RQ, inferred from benthic DIC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, falls within the range of in-situ RQ values reported in the literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.145"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e9886">However, the model tends to systematically overestimate organic carbon remineralization rates compared to observations. For most sites, the POM rain rates are taken from literature estimates or export–production relationships and are not co-located and time-aligned with the individual in situ flux measurements, so uncertainties in the local POM supply and its degradation kinetics are likely the source of this positive bias. To quantify how much of the disagreement could in principle be absorbed by either the POM flux or the reactivity, we performed three sensitivity tests at the Iberian Margin shallow calibration site, holding all other parameters fixed. Scaling the imposed POM rain by factors 0.5–1.5, while keeping all other organic-matter parameters constant, changes the vertically integrated remineralization rate by roughly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, with an almost linear response. In contrast, globally scaling both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fast</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">slow</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over a range of 0.5–2.0, while keeping the fast/slow partitioning and POM rain constant, produces smaller and more non-monotonic changes in the integrated rate because faster degradation near the surface reduces the amount of POM transported to depth. Varying the partitioning between the fast and slow pools (while keeping total POM rain and rate constants fixed) only weakly affects the depth-integrated remineralization, but does shift where in the sediment column carbon is oxidized and hence the balance between aerobic and anaerobic pathways. It should be noted that, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fast</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">slow</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and their partitioning are not independently constrained, and different combinations of these parameters can yield similar total remineralisation rates. These tests indicate that uncertainties in the local POM flux are sufficient to account for much of the overestimation of remineralization, and that global rescaling of the organic matter kinetics and their fast/slow partitioning also affects the integrated rate, but to a lesser degree and more non-linearly. At the same time, the sensitivity tests suggest that RADIv2 is not locked into a “too-reactive” regime. The systematic positive bias across case studies is consistent with uncertainties in the local POM supply, and/or to lesser a extent, the effective reactivity of the sedimentary organic matter.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Metamodel</title>
      <p id="d2e9970">Many GOBMs either oversimplify or completely omit processes governing the exchange of solutes and particulates at the SWI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx109 bib1.bibx107" id="paren.146"/>. This omission can introduce biases in carbon and biogeochemical budgets, particularly in coastal and shelf regions, where sediment dynamics influence water column biogeochemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.147"/> and thus air-sea gas exchange. The challenge of benthic representation in GOBMs is compounded by the spatial heterogeneity of seafloor sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.148"/> and variability in key environmental parameters, such as organic matter fluxes and bottom-water concentrations. These complexities make it difficult to apply generic parameterizations across diverse benthic environments, while fully integrating benthic processes into GOBMs is constrained by high computational cost.</p>
      <p id="d2e9982">To improve the representation of benthic–pelagic coupling in GOBMs, we derive a regression-based metamodel that captures key solute exchange at the sediment–water interface. The metamodel is calibrated by fitting it to RADIv2 benthic fluxes from the ensemble simulations summarized in Table 2 and Figs. 2–5. The metamodel represents benthic solute fluxes as linear functions of five key environmental drivers: bottom-water temperature, current velocity, calcite saturation state, and POC (converted from POM according to redfield stoichiometry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.149"/>) and PIC deposition fluxes. These predictors were chosen based on experimental, field, and modelling studies that identify them as the dominant physical and biogeochemical controls on benthic DIC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and TA fluxes. Bottom-water temperature controls molecular diffusion coefficients and the rates of redox reactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx123" id="paren.150"/>, the POC flux drives organic-matter degradation and calcite dissolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.151"/>, while PIC concentration and the saturation state govern carbonate dissolution and precipitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.152"/>. The current velocity modulates SWI exchange and carbonate kinetics via its effect on diffusive boundary-layer thickness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.153"/>, and dispersion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.154"/>. Within the RADIv2 ensemble, these five drivers explain most of the variance in the simulated benthic fluxes across the six calibration sites, while keeping the metamodel compact and compatible with the variables typically available as diagnostics in GOBMs. For the metamodel training ensembles, we set the refractory fraction of particulate organic matter to zero and treat all incoming POC as reactive (assigned to the fast or slow pools), because the POC flux is used directly as a predictor. In RADIv2, refractory organic carbon does not react and therefore does not contribute to benthic solute fluxes, so including a refractory fraction in the training data would introduce ambiguity when applying the metamodel in larger-scale models: if the training was based on a total POC flux that includes a refractory fraction, but the same fraction is not treated consistently in the host model, the predicted benthic fluxes would be systematically biased.</p>
      <p id="d2e10015">By reducing the complex diagenetic processes simulated by RADIv2 into simplified mathematical relationships that accurately reproduce its outputs, the metamodel provides a robust and scalable representation of SWI exchange, making it well-suited for integration into large-scale ocean models.</p>
      <p id="d2e10018">The metamodel equations are as follows:

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M453" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E21"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>21</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E22"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>22</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0013</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E23"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>23</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the DIC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and alkalinity sediment fluxes [mmol m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>], respectively. Positive fluxes indicate solute release from sediments, while negative fluxes reflect sediment uptake. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bottom-water temperature [°C], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bottom-water current velocity [m s<sup>−1</sup>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bottom-water calcite saturation state [–], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the POC rain rate [mol m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>] and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the PIC rain rate [mol m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>].</p>
      <p id="d2e10449">Figure 6 compares the simulated benthic solute fluxes for DIC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and TA from RADIv2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis) with the corresponding predictions from the metamodel (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis). The data points are color-coded by marine environment. The high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and relatively low RMSE values demonstrate the metamodel’s ability to accurately reproduce RADIv2 outputs, while also capturing flux variability across diverse marine settings.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e10490">Comparison of RADIv2 simulated benthic solute fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis) with metamodel predictions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis) for DIC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and TA. Data points are color-coded by marine environment. Positive fluxes indicate solute release from sediments, while negative fluxes reflect sediment uptake.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e10524">We performed an offline comparison of the metamodel against in situ benthic flux measurements at the North Sea sites. The metamodel is explicitly designed as a surrogate for RADIv2: its coefficients are calibrated on RADIv2 ensemble outputs and are not tuned directly to observations. Any mismatch with in situ data can therefore be separated into biases and structural limitations in RADIv2 itself, and an additional emulation error introduced by the regression (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). To quantify this emulation error and to compare the metamodel directly to both observations and RADIv2, we ran the metamodel with the same bottom-water and depositional drivers used in the corresponding RADIv2 North Sea ensemble set-up (Table 2). Figure 7 compares the resulting metamodel-predicted fluxes with the underlying RADIv2 fluxes and the in situ observations. The metamodel follows the RADIv2 simulations but predicts slightly lower median and mean fluxes at this coastal site, consistent with a single global fit trained across both coastal and deep-sea regimes, which can pull coastal predictions downward toward the fitted mean.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e10554">North Sea benthic fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (left), DIC (middle), and TA (right) from observations, RADIv2, and the metamodel. Box–whisker plots compare the distribution of RADIv2 fluxes (“RADIv2”) with observational and modelled site means (“Obs”). The box spans the interquartile range (25 %–75 %), and the whiskers extend to the 5 %–95 % range. The solid orange horizontal line indicates the median, the green dashed line indicates the mean, and coloured jittered dots show individual observations. Negative fluxes correspond to uptake by the sediment, whereas positive DIC and TA fluxes indicate release to the water column.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/1965/2026/gmd-19-1965-2026-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion and future development</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>RADIv2</title>
      <p id="d2e10590">In RADIv2, diffusive mass transport across the SWI occurs via molecular diffusion in low-permeability sediments, with an additional dispersion term included for highly permeable sediments. This is particularly relevant in coastal sediments, where permeability is typically higher and bottom-water currents are stronger compared to deeper regions, resulting in sediment fluxes that exceed diffusive fluxes alone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.155"/>. In cases where sediments are sufficiently permeable, a third transport regime, turbulent transport, can contribute to mass transfer across the SWI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117" id="paren.156"/>. The transitions between these three regimes (molecular diffusion, dispersive diffusion, and turbulent transport), are characterized by the permeability Reynolds number, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sediment permeability, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the shear velocity and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the kinematic viscosity. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterizes the turbulent regime at the seafloor, with the permeability of the sediments determining whether the turbulence can penetrate through the SWI. A low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates a regime dominated by molecular diffusion, while a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that turbulent transport dominates mass transfer across the SWI. These different regimes can be parameterized by effective diffusion coefficient <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117" id="paren.157"/> and can be integrated into future updates of RADIv2. However, the main limitation of this method is its reliance on sediment permeability, a variable property that is challenging to measure in situ. While efforts are underway to map seabed permeability in coastal regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.158"/>, a global dataset for linking permeability to RADIv2 is not yet available. A transient test case with tidal currents (Supplement Sect. S2, Fig. S2) illustrates how the present formulation in RADIv2 translates such hydrodynamic forcing into time-varying benthic O<sub>2</sub> fluxes.</p>
      <p id="d2e10707">Future efforts will focus on improving the representation of organic carbon degradation kinetics, a key driver of sediment fluxes. Currently, RADIv2 divides organic carbon into two reactive classes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fast</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">slow</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), each following first-order reaction kinetics. This approach to organic matter degradation produces a vertical structure in bulk (apparent) reactivity: the more labile pool is consumed near the sediment–water interface, so deeper layers are dominated by less reactive carbon. This is sufficient for well-mixed sediments, where organic carbon reactivity is relatively constant within the mixed layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.159"/>. However, experimental studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120" id="paren.160"/>, field observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.161"/>, and recent theoretical advances <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.162"/> have shown that organic carbon reactivity often declines with degradation. In RADIv2 each organic-matter pool has a fixed degradation rate constant, and degradation does do not weaken with depth or time. The work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.163"/> summarizes the conditions under which different degradation kinetics are suitable, and highlights the need to model organic carbon reactivity as a continuum that declines with age and burial depth in regions that receive highly reactive OM or poorly-mixed environments, rather than a small number of fixed-k pools. Incorporating such an approach into RADIv2 would enhance its ability to simulate organic matter degradation under a broader range of marine sediments. Future work could focus on dynamically adjusting organic matter degradation kinetics based on the sediment mixing regime (quantified by the Péclet number) and the reactivity of incoming organic carbon. This would also help address the current overestimation of organic matter degradation rates by better capturing the declining reactivity of organic carbon over time, providing more accurate remineralization estimates.</p>
      <p id="d2e10748">Fluxes across the sediment–water interface are controlled by processes that are strongly concentrated in the upper centimetres of the sediment, so the vertical grid spacing must be sufficiently fine to resolve the associated reaction and concentration gradients. Future applications of RADIv2 could benefit from a non-uniform vertical grid, with finer spacing near the sediment–water interface and coarser spacing at depth, particularly in coastal sediments or simulations that require a deeper sediment column. RADIv2 is a living model, and ongoing developments focus on supporting non-uniform grids (for example, with finer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near the SWI and coarser spacing at depth) to further improve the efficiency of simulating of near-surface processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e10761">Both RADIv1 and RADIv2 are optimised for simulating carbon and oxygen cycling. In the present configuration, RADIv2 includes dissolved Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Mn<sup>2+</sup> and their oxidised solid phases, and represents their role as electron acceptors in organic-matter degradation. However, it does not resolve a full Fe–Mn–S mineral network. Sulfide produced by sulfate reduction is treated with simplified oxidation and precipitation terms (see Table 1), and processes such as explicit FeS/pyrite formation, burial and re-oxidation are not included. These missing pathways can be important for the alkalinity budget in iron-rich, bioturbated coastal sediments, because they control whether sulfide is buried as pyrite or repeatedly re-oxidised and recycled back to sulfate through Fe–S redox cycling, and these alternative pathways have different net TA yields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.164"/>. Future extensions of RADIv2 should focus on implementing more comprehensive iron and manganese cycles with explicit sulfide–mineral pathways, following formulations such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.165"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.166"/>, to improve applications in such settings.</p>
      <p id="d2e10798">RADIv2 was designed with extensibility in mind, providing a flexible and adaptable framework that makes the addition of new components or species straightforward. Moreover, RADIv2 can be updated to represent specific environments, such as mangrove forests, estuaries, or nearshore intertidal zones. This versatility enables RADIv2 to serve as a robust foundation for advancing future diagenetic research across a wide range of applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Metamodel</title>
      <p id="d2e10809">Significant discrepancies exist between estimates of the ocean carbon sink derived from pCO<sub>2</sub> products and those produced by ocean biogeochemical models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.167"/>, which are further complicated by inter-model variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="paren.168"/>. One major uncertainty comes from the poor representation of particulate deposition at the seafloor and the resulting benthic fluxes from remineralization, dissolution, and exchange at the SWI. The exclusion of sediment-seawater exchange processes in current models limits their ability to accurately simulate coastal-ocean productivity and air-sea gas exchange as benthic processes play an important role in nutrient recycling and carbon dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.169"/>, particularly in shallow regions where the seafloor and bottom waters directly interact with the surface layer. An analysis by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="text.170"/> of the marine biogeochemical components in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Earth System Models (ESMs) reveals that most CMIP5 models lacked any representation of sediments. While CMIP6 models have made significant progress incorporating sediment processes, their treatment remains highly simplified and, in some cases, is still omitted. When sediments are not explicitly represented, particulates that reach the seafloor are either instantaneously remineralized <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="paren.171"/> or permanently buried upon deposition (numerically lost) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.172"/>. Most ESMs that include sediments rely on a box-model approach, where organic matter reaching the seafloor is either remineralized or buried based on simplified relationships with downward organic fluxes. Some ESMs estimate organic matter remineralization through denitrification following the formulation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.173"/> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.174"/>, with additional pathways for aerobic respiration or sulfate reduction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.175"/>. More advanced sediment models, such as those incorporated in HAMOCC and PISCES-v2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.176"/>, adopt a layered sediment module based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.177"/>. While this represents a significant step forwards, these models still rely on highly simplified treatments of key diagenetic processes. Important mechanisms, such as bioturbation (irrigation), dispersion, and anaerobic organic matter degradation are either absent or not fully accounted for.</p>
      <p id="d2e10856">Since RADIv2 is developed in Julia, while ESMs are typically written in FORTRAN, direct coupling is not straightforward without significant code translation. Additionally, fully kinetic diagenetic models like RADIv2 are computationally intensive, making their real-time integration into Earth System Models currently unfeasible. This study introduces a process-based metamodel that captures key diagenetic processes, often oversimplified or absent in existing parameterizations, without requiring full integration.</p>
      <p id="d2e10859">The metamodel is validated for diverse marine environments, accurately reproducing SWI exchanges simulated by RADIv2. By accounting for the heterogeneity and variability in sediment properties and environmental conditions, the metamodel is designed for broad applicability. However, the present training and validation set primarily samples temperate shelves, margins, and deep-sea settings, and does not explicitly include environments such as deltaic systems, very shallow nearshore regions, or carbonate-rich tropical shelves. Expanding the training ensemble to a wider, yet physically consistent, range of bottom-water conditions and particulate fluxes, that can also be validated with in-situ observations, represents an important future improvement, especially for more localized applications. The flexibility of RADIv2 allows for customization to specific marine environments, such as bays and estuaries, when region-specific data are available, enabling either the expansion of the present metamodel or the generation of specialized metamodels for regional applications.</p>
      <p id="d2e10862">Future work will focus on expanding the metamodel to include additional particulate fluxes, such as particulate metallic fluxes, and on parameterizing the corresponding SWI exchange. Ongoing developments will also expand the range of solute fluxes covered by the metamodel, including phosphate, nitrate, ammonium, methane, and particulate organic and inorganic carbon fluxes. This expansion is expected to improve biogeochemical budget estimates, as the lack of sediment regeneration of nutrients from remineralized organic matter can lead to underestimation of primary production in biogeochemical models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx122 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.178"/>. The adaptability of the RADIv2 framework allows the approach presented here to be extended to develop metamodels for any solute or particulate flux included in RADIv2, facilitating its application across diverse marine environments and geochemical processes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e10877">RADIv2 is a versatile diagenetic model designed to simulate sediment-water interface (SWI) exchanges across a range of marine environments. Built using Julia’s DifferentialEquations.jl package, RADIv2 leverages high-performance capabilities and an adaptive structure to address the complexity and variability of sediment processes. A key feature of RADIv2 is the flexibility of its framework, which allows for adaptation to specific environmental conditions and simulation setups. This capability enables optimization for diverse marine environments, from dynamic coastal regions to stable deep-sea sediments. The ensemble simulation feature in RADIv2 constrains variable environmental parameters, such as bottom-water temperature, currents, and particulate export fluxes, by generating statistical envelopes that capture variability, better reflecting the natural fluctuations observed in in situ measurements over time and helping to reduce uncertainty in model inputs. This approach enhances the model’s ability to represent the heterogeneity of marine sediments. RADIv2 also includes an optimization scheme for tuning model parameters based on in-situ observations, further improving model accuracy. Simulated solute fluxes in RADIv2 across various marine environments generally align with observed values from the literature, though the narrower variability reflects the model’s steady-state assumptions. Despite this, mean fluxes and empirically derived RQ values remain consistent with in-situ data, indicating that RADIv2 provides robust estimates of benthic fluxes over longer timescales. However, the model tends to overestimate organic carbon remineralization rates.</p>
      <p id="d2e10880">Using RADIv2 outputs, we developed a metamodel that parameterizes benthic-pelagic coupling with a simplified set of equations. These equations accurately capture steady-state benthic solute fluxes linked to the marine carbon budget across various environments, accounting for sediment heterogeneity and environmental variability. The metamodel builds on a comprehensive diagenetic framework that incorporates detailed sedimentary processes, without the high computational demands of fully coupled water column-sediment biogeochemical models at the global scale. This ensures more accurate processing of particulates at the seafloor and accounts for the exchange of remineralization and dissolution products between sediments and bottom waters. Ultimately, this metamodel offers a pathway for more accurate representations of benthic-pelagic coupling in global ocean biogeochemistry models, improving estimates of ocean biogeochemical cycling.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e10887">The current version of RADIv2, implemented in Julia, is freely available from GitHub at <uri>https://github.com/RADI-model</uri> (last access: May 2025) under the GNU General Public License v3.0. The exact version of the model used in this study, along with all input data and scripts required to reproduce the simulations and analyses presented in the paper, is archived on Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18386461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18386461</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="altparen.179"/>). RADIv2 users should cite both this publication and the corresponding Zenodo repository.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e10899">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1965-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1965-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e10908">HFZ was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing of the original draft, and visualization. OS was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, reviewing the manuscript and supervision of the project. JJM was responsible for the methodology, validation, and reviewing the manuscript. MPH was responsible for validation, software, and reviewing the manuscript. RS was responsible for the validation and reviewing the manuscript. DC was responsible for validation and reviewing the manuscript. DM was responsible for validation and reviewing the manuscript. KS was responsible for validation and reviewing the manuscript. VLF was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, reviewing the manuscript and supervision of the project.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e10914">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e10920">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e10926">We  acknowledge the use of artificial intelligence tools in the development of this work. GitHub Copilot (<uri>https://github.com/features/copilot</uri>, last access:  12 February 2026) was used to assist in reviewing, optimizing, and improving the code for RADIv2.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e10934">As part of the La Rochelle Territoire Zéro Carbone (LRTZC) initiative, HFZ and VLF received support from funding provided by the Plan d’Investissement d'Avenir (PIA) through the Territoires d’Innovation de Grande Envergure (TIGA), managed by the Caisse des Dépôts, as well as from the Région Nouvelle-Aquitaine (grant agreement 25875420). VLF received support from funding provided by the REWRITE project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No. 101081357. This work is also supported by an ERC grant Deep-C #101162777 to OS. DC, DM, and RS acknowledge support from the NASA Carbon Monitoring System program.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e10941">This paper was edited by Pearse Buchanan and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Friedlingstein et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Bakker, D. C. E., Hauck, J., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Luijkx, I. T., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Anthoni, P., Barbero, L., Bates, N. R., Becker, M., Bellouin, N., Decharme, B., Bopp, L., Brasika, I. B. M., Cadule, P., Chamberlain, M. A., Chandra, N., Chau, T.-T.-T., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Cronin, M., Dou, X., Enyo, K., Evans, W., Falk, S., Feely, R. A., Feng, L., Ford, D. J., Gasser, T., Ghattas, J., Gkritzalis, T., Grassi, G., Gregor, L., Gruber, N., Gürses, Ö., Harris, I., Hefner, M., Heinke, J., Houghton, R. A., Hurtt, G. C., Iida, Y., Ilyina, T., Jacobson, A. R., Jain, A., Jarníková, T., Jersild, A., Jiang, F., Jin, Z., Joos, F., Kato, E., Keeling, R. F., Kennedy, D., Klein Goldewijk, K., Knauer, J., Korsbakken, J. I., Körtzinger, A., Lan, X., Lefèvre, N., Li, H., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Ma, L., Marland, G., Mayot, N., McGuire, P. C., McKinley, G. A., Meyer, G., Morgan, E. J., Munro, D. R., Nakaoka, S.-I., Niwa, Y., O'Brien, K. M., Olsen, A., Omar, A. M., Ono, T., Paulsen, M., Pierrot, D., Pocock, K., Poulter, B., Powis, C. M., Rehder, G., Resplandy, L., Robertson, E., Rödenbeck, C., Rosan, T. M., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Smallman, T. L., Smith, S. M., Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Sun, Q., Sutton, A. J., Sweeney, C., Takao, S., Tans, P. P., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Tsujino, H., Tubiello, F., van der Werf, G. R., van Ooijen, E., Wanninkhof, R., Watanabe, M., Wimart-Rousseau, C., Yang, D., Yang, X., Yuan, W., Yue, X., Zaehle, S., Zeng, J., and Zheng, B.: Global Carbon Budget 2023, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Anderson(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, L. A.: On the hydrogen and oxygen content of marine phytoplankton, Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic research papers, 42, 1675–1680, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00072-E" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0967-0637(95)00072-E</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Anderson et al.(1994)Anderson, Rowe, Kemp, Trumbores, and Biscaye</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, R., Rowe, G., Kemp, P., Trumbores, S., and Biscaye, P.: Carbon budget for the mid-slope depocenter of the Middle Atlantic Bight, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 41, 669–703, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(94)90040-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0967-0645(94)90040-X</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Archer and Devol(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Archer, D. and Devol, A.: Benthic oxygen fluxes on the Washington shelf and slope: A comparison of in situ microelectrode and chamber flux measurements, Limnology and Oceanography, 37, 614–629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.3.0614" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1992.37.3.0614</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Archer et al.(2002)Archer, Morford, and Emerson</label><mixed-citation>Archer, D., Morford, J., and Emerson, S.: A model of suboxic sedimentary diagenesis suitable for automatic tuning and gridded global domains, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16, 17–1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001288" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GB001288</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Arndt et al.(2013)Arndt, Jørgensen, LaRowe, Middelburg, Pancost, and Regnier</label><mixed-citation>Arndt, S., Jørgensen, B. B., LaRowe, D. E., Middelburg, J., Pancost, R., and Regnier, P.: Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: A review and synthesis, Earth-Science Reviews, 123, 53–86, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.02.008</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Aumont and Bopp(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Aumont, O. and Bopp, L.: Globalizing results from ocean in situ iron fertilization studies, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002591" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GB002591</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Aumont et al.(2015)Aumont, Éthé, Tagliabue, Bopp, and Gehlen</label><mixed-citation>Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Berelson et al.(2002)Berelson, Johnson, Coale, and Li</label><mixed-citation>Berelson, W., Johnson, K., Coale, K., and Li, H.-C.: Organic matter diagenesis in the sediments of the San Pedro Shelf along a transect affected by sewage effluent, Continental Shelf Research, 22, 1101–1115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(01)00120-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0278-4343(01)00120-0</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Berelson et al.(2003)Berelson, McManus, Coale, Johnson, Burdige, Kilgore, Colodner, Chavez, Kudela, and Boucher</label><mixed-citation>Berelson, W., McManus, J., Coale, K., Johnson, K., Burdige, D., Kilgore, T., Colodner, D., Chavez, F., Kudela, R., and Boucher, J.: A time series of benthic flux measurements from Monterey Bay, CA, Continental Shelf Research, 23, 457–481, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(03)00009-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0278-4343(03)00009-8</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Berelson et al.(1994)Berelson, Hammond, McManus, and Kilgore</label><mixed-citation>Berelson, W. M., Hammond, D. E., McManus, J., and Kilgore, T. E.: Dissolution kinetics of calcium carbonate in equatorial Pacific sediments, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 8, 219–235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03394" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93GB03394</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Bezanson et al.(2017)Bezanson, Edelman, Karpinski, and Shah</label><mixed-citation>Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., and Shah, V. B.: Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM Review, 59, 65–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1137/141000671</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Boudreau(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Boudreau, B. P.: A method-of-lines code for carbon and nutrient diagenesis in aquatic sediments, Computers &amp; Geosciences, 22, 479–496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(95)00115-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0098-3004(95)00115-8</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Boudreau(1997)</label><mixed-citation> Boudreau, B. P.: Diagenetic models and their implementation, vol. 505, Springer Berlin, ISBN-13 97S-3-642-64399-6, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Boudreau(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Boudreau, B. P.: Carbonate dissolution rates at the deep ocean floor, Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 744–748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054231" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL054231</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Brenner et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Brenner, H., Braeckman, U., Le Guitton, M., and Meysman, F. J.: The impact of sedimentary alkalinity release on the water column CO<sub>2</sub> system in the North Sea, Biogeosciences, 13, 841–863, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-841-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-841-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Brink et al.(1998)Brink, Arnone, Coble, Flagg, Jones, Kindle, Lee, Phinney, Wood, Yentsch, and Young</label><mixed-citation>Brink, K., Arnone, R., Coble, P., Flagg, C., Jones, B., Kindle, J., Lee, C., Phinney, D., Wood, M., Yentsch, C., and Young, D.: Monsoons boost biological productivity in Arabian Sea, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 79, 165–169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98EO00120</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Burt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Burt, W., Thomas, H., Pätsch, J., Omar, A., Schrum, C., Daewel, U., Brenner, H., and de Baar, H.: Radium isotopes as a tracer of sediment-water column exchange in the North Sea, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 28, 786–804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004825" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB004825</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Caldeira and Wickett(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Caldeira, K. and Wickett, M. E.: Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH, Nature, 425, 365–365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Canfield et al.(1993)Canfield, Thamdrup, and Hansen</label><mixed-citation>Canfield, D. E., Thamdrup, B., and Hansen, J. W.: The anaerobic degradation of organic matter in Danish coastal sediments: iron reduction, manganese reduction, and sulfate reduction, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 57, 3867–3883, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(93)90340-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(93)90340-3</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Canfield et al.(2005)Canfield, Kristensen, and Thamdrup</label><mixed-citation> Canfield, D. E., Kristensen, E., and Thamdrup, B.: The iron and manganese cycles,   Advances in marine biology,   48,  269–312, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Carroll et al.(2020)Carroll, Menemenlis, Adkins, Bowman, Brix, Dutkiewicz, Fenty, Gierach, Hill, Jahn, Landschützer, Lauderdale, Liu, Manizza, Naviaux, Rödenbeck, Schimel, Van Der Stocken, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Carroll, D., Menemenlis, D., Adkins, J. F., Bowman, K. W., Brix, H., Dutkiewicz, S., Fenty, I., Gierach, M. M., Hill, C., Jahn, O., Landschützer, P., Lauderdale, J. M., Liu, J., Manizza, M., Naviaux, J. D., Rödenbeck, C., Schimel, D. S., Van Der Stocken, T., and Zhang, H.: Seasonal to multi-decadal air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes from the data-constrained ECCO-Darwin global ocean biogeochemistry model: Estimates of Seasonal to Multidecadal Surface Ocean pCO<sub>2</sub> and Air-Sea CO<sub>2</sub> Flux, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2019MS001888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001888" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001888</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Cheng et al.(2022)Cheng, Von Schuckmann, Abraham, Trenberth, Mann, Zanna, England, Zika, Fasullo, Yu, Pan, Zhu, Newsom, Bronselaer, and Lin</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, L., Von Schuckmann, K., Abraham, J. P., Trenberth, K. E., Mann, M. E., Zanna, L., England, M. H., Zika, J. D., Fasullo, J. T., Yu, Y., Pan, Y., Zhu, J., Newsom, E. R., Bronselaer, B., and Lin, X.: Past and future ocean warming, Nature Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 3, 776–794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00345-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-022-00345-1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Cheriton et al.(2014)Cheriton, McPhee-Shaw, Shaw, Stanton, Bellingham, and Storlazzi</label><mixed-citation>Cheriton, O. M., McPhee-Shaw, E. E., Shaw, W. J., Stanton, T. P., Bellingham, J. G., and Storlazzi, C. D.: Suspended particulate layers and internal waves over the southern Monterey Bay continental shelf: an important control on shelf mud belts?, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119, 428–444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009360" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JC009360</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Christensen(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Christensen, J. P.: Sulfate reduction and carbon oxidation rates in continental shelf sediments, an examination of offshelf carbon transport, Continental Shelf Research, 9, 223–246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(89)90025-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0278-4343(89)90025-3</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Christensen et al.(1984)Christensen, Devol, and Smethie Jr</label><mixed-citation>Christensen, J. P., Devol, A. H., and Smethie Jr, W. M.: Biological enhancement of solute exchange between sediments and bottom water on the Washington continental shelf, Continental Shelf Research, 3, 9–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(84)90040-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0278-4343(84)90040-2</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Christensen et al.(1987)Christensen, Smethie Jr, and Devol</label><mixed-citation>Christensen, J. P., Smethie Jr, W. M., and Devol, A. H.: Benthic nutrient regeneration and denitrification on the Washington continental shelf, Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 34, 1027–1047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90051-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(87)90051-3</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>IPCC(2023)</label><mixed-citation>IPCC:  Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:   Lee,  H. and  Romero,  J., IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647" ext-link-type="DOI">10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>De Borger et al.(2021)De Borger, Braeckman, and Soetaert</label><mixed-citation>De Borger, E., Braeckman, U., and Soetaert, K.: Rapid organic matter cycling in North Sea sediments, Continental Shelf Research, 214, 104327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2020.104327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2020.104327</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>DeVries et al.(2023)DeVries, Yamamoto, Wanninkhof, Gruber, Hauck, Müller, Bopp, Carroll, Carter, Chau, Doney, Gehlen, Gloege, Gregor, Henson, Kim, Iida, Ilyina, Landschützer, Le Quéré, Munro, Nissen, Patara, Pérez, Resplandy, Rodgers, Schwinger, Séférian, Sicardi, Terhaar, Triñanes, Tsujino, Watson, Yasunaka, and Zeng</label><mixed-citation>DeVries, T., Yamamoto, K., Wanninkhof, R., Gruber, N., Hauck, J., Müller, J. D., Bopp, L., Carroll, D., Carter, B., Chau, T., Doney, S. C., Gehlen, M., Gloege, L., Gregor, L., Henson, S., Kim, J. H., Iida, Y., Ilyina, T., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Munro, D., Nissen, C., Patara, L., Pérez, F. F., Resplandy, L., Rodgers, K. B., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Sicardi, V., Terhaar, J., Triñanes, J., Tsujino, H., Watson, A., Yasunaka, S., and Zeng, J.: Magnitude, trends, and variability of the global ocean carbon sink from 1985 to 2018, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 37, e2023GB007780, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007780" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GB007780</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Diamessis and Redekopp(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Diamessis, P. J. and Redekopp, L. G.: Numerical investigation of solitary internal wave-induced global instability in shallow water benthic boundary layers, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 36, 784–812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2900.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO2900.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Diaz and Rosenberg(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Diaz, R. J. and Rosenberg, R.: Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems, Science, 321, 926–929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1156401</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Doney et al.(2009)Doney, Fabry, Feely, and Kleypas</label><mixed-citation>Doney, S. C., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., and Kleypas, J. A.: Ocean acidification: the other CO<sub>2</sub> problem, Annual Review of Marine Science, 1, 169–192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Dong et al.(2019)Dong, Berelson, Rollins, Subhas, Naviaux, Celestian, Liu, Turaga, Kemnitz, Byrne, and Adkins</label><mixed-citation>Dong, S., Berelson, W. M., Rollins, N. E., Subhas, A. V., Naviaux, J. D., Celestian, A. J., Liu, X., Turaga, N., Kemnitz, N. J., Byrne, R. H., and Adkins, J. F.: Aragonite dissolution kinetics and calcite/aragonite ratios in sinking and suspended particles in the North Pacific, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 515, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.03.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2019.03.016</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Egger et al.(2018)Egger, Riedinger, Mogollón, and Jørgensen</label><mixed-citation>Egger, M., Riedinger, N., Mogollón, J. M., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Global diffusive fluxes of methane in marine sediments, Nature Geoscience, 11, 421–425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0122-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0122-8</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Emerson and Bender(1981)</label><mixed-citation> Emerson, S. and Bender, M.: Carbon fluxes at the sediment-water interface of the deep-sea: calcium carbonate preservation, Journal of Marine Research, 39, 139–162, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Epping et al.(2002)Epping, van der Zee, Soetaert, and Helder</label><mixed-citation> Epping, E., van der Zee, C., Soetaert, K., and Helder, W.: On the oxidation and burial of organic carbon in sediments of the Iberian margin and Nazaré Canyon (NE Atlantic), Progress in Oceanography, 52, 399–431, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Feely et al.(2004)Feely, Sabine, Lee, Berelson, Kleypas, Fabry, and Millero</label><mixed-citation>Feely, R. A., Sabine, C. L., Lee, K., Berelson, W., Kleypas, J., Fabry, V. J., and Millero, F. J.: Impact of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> on the CaCO<sub>3</sub> system in the oceans, Science, 305, 362–366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097329" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1097329</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Feldt and Stukalov(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Feldt, R. and Stukalov, A.: Blackboxoptim.jl,   Github, <uri>https://github.com/robertfeldt/BlackBoxOptim.jl</uri> (last access: 12 February 2026), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Fennel and Testa(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Fennel, K. and Testa, J. M.: Biogeochemical controls on coastal hypoxia, Annual Review of Marine Science, 11, 105–130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010318-095138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-010318-095138</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Fiadeiro and Veronis(1977)</label><mixed-citation>Fiadeiro, M. E. and Veronis, G.: On weighted-mean schemes for the finite-difference approximation to the advection-diffusion equation, Tellus, 29, 512–522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1977.tb00763.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1977.tb00763.x</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Fossing(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Fossing, H.: Sulfate reduction in shelf sediments in the upwelling region off Central Peru, Continental Shelf Research, 10, 355–367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(90)90056-R" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0278-4343(90)90056-R</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Fossing et al.(2004)Fossing, Berg, Thamdrup, Rysgaard, Sorensen, and Nielsen</label><mixed-citation> Fossing, H., Berg, P., Thamdrup, B., Rysgaard, S., Sorensen, H. M., and Nielsen, K.: A model set-up for an oxygen and nutrient flux model for Aarhus Bay (Denmark), NERI technical report, 483,  ISBN 87-7772-793-2, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Froelich et al.(1979)Froelich, Klinkhammer, Bender, Luedtke, Heath, Cullen, Dauphin, Hammond, Hartman, and Maynard</label><mixed-citation>Froelich, P., Klinkhammer, G., Bender, M. L., Luedtke, N., Heath, G. R., Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., and Maynard, V.: Early oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern equatorial Atlantic: suboxic diagenesis, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 43, 1075–1090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Glud et al.(2007)Glud, Berg, Fossing, and Jørgensen</label><mixed-citation>Glud, R. N., Berg, P., Fossing, H., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Effect of the diffusive boundary layer on benthic mineralization and O<sub>2</sub> distribution: A theoretical model analysis, Limnology and Oceanography, 52, 547–557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0547</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Grebmeier and McRoy(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Grebmeier, J. M. and McRoy, C. P.: Pelagic-benthic coupling on the shelf of the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. III. Benthic food supply and carbon cycling, Marine Ecology Progress Series,  79–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps053079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps053079</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Hedges et al.(2002)Hedges, Baldock, Gélinas, Lee, Peterson, and Wakeham</label><mixed-citation>Hedges, J., Baldock, J., Gélinas, Y., Lee, C., Peterson, M., and Wakeham, S.: The biochemical and elemental compositions of marine plankton: A NMR perspective, Marine Chemistry, 78, 47–63, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(02)00009-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0304-4203(02)00009-9</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Heinze et al.(1999)Heinze, Maier-Reimer, Winguth, and Archer</label><mixed-citation>Heinze, C., Maier-Reimer, E., Winguth, A. M., and Archer, D.: A global oceanic sediment model for long-term climate studies, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13, 221–250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98GB02812" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98GB02812</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Hinrichs et al.(1999)Hinrichs, Hayes, Sylva, Brewer, and DeLong</label><mixed-citation>Hinrichs, K.-U., Hayes, J. M., Sylva, S. P., Brewer, P. G., and DeLong, E. F.: Methane-consuming archaebacteria in marine sediments, Nature, 398, 802–805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/19751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/19751</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Hosegood and van Haren(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Hosegood, P. and van Haren, H.: Near-bed solibores over the continental slope in the Faeroe-Shetland Channel, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 51, 2943–2971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.09.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.09.016</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Huettel et al.(2014)Huettel, Berg, and Kostka</label><mixed-citation>Huettel, M., Berg, P., and Kostka, J. E.: Benthic exchange and biogeochemical cycling in permeable sediments, Annual review of marine Science, 6, 23–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-051413-012706" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-051413-012706</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Humphreys et al.(2022a)Humphreys, Lewis, Sharp, and Pierrot</label><mixed-citation>Humphreys, M. P., Lewis, E. R., Sharp, J. D., and Pierrot, D.: PyCO2SYS v1.8: marine carbonate system calculations in Python, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 15–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-15-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-15-2022</ext-link>, 2022a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Humphreys et al.(2022b)Humphreys, Orr, van Heuven, Pierrot, Lewis, and Wallace</label><mixed-citation>Humphreys, M. P., Orr, J. C., van Heuven, S. M., Pierrot, D., Lewis, E. R., and Wallace, D. W.: mvdh7/CO2System.jl: CO2System.jl: CO2SYS in Julia (v2.0.5-jl.1), Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6395674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6395674</ext-link>, 2022b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Ilyina et al.(2013)Ilyina, Six, Segschneider, Maier-Reimer, Li, and Núñez-Riboni</label><mixed-citation>Ilyina, T., Six, K. D., Segschneider, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Li, H., and Núñez-Riboni, I.: Global ocean biogeochemistry model HAMOCC: Model architecture and performance as component of the MPI-Earth system model in different CMIP5 experimental realizations, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 5, 287–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000178" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012MS000178</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Ingle et al.(1973)Ingle, Culberson, Hawley, and Pytkowicz</label><mixed-citation>Ingle, S., Culberson, C., Hawley, J., and Pytkowicz, R.: The solubility of calcite in seawater at atmospheric pressure and 35% permil; salinity, Marine Chemistry, 1, 295–307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(73)90019-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4203(73)90019-4</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>ITTC(2011)</label><mixed-citation>ITTC: Fresh Water and Seawater Properties – 7.5-02-01-03, <uri>https://www.ittc.info/media/11764/75-02-01-03.pdf</uri> (last access: 18 February 2026), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Jorgensen(1978)</label><mixed-citation>Jorgensen, B. B.: A comparison of methods for the quantification of bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments, Geomicrobiology Journal, 1, 11–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01490457809377721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01490457809377721</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Jørgensen(1982)</label><mixed-citation> Jørgensen, B. B.: Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed – the role of sulphate reduction, Nature, 296, 643–645, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Jørgensen et al.(2022)Jørgensen, Wenzhöfer, Egger, and Glud</label><mixed-citation>Jørgensen, B. B., Wenzhöfer, F., Egger, M., and Glud, R. N.: Sediment oxygen consumption: Role in the global marine carbon cycle, Earth-science reviews, 228, 103987, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103987</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Keeling et al.(2010)Keeling, Körtzinger, and Gruber</label><mixed-citation>Keeling, R. F., Körtzinger, A., and Gruber, N.: Ocean deoxygenation in a warming world, Annual Review of Marine Science, 2, 199–229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Kuderer and Middelburg(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Kuderer, M. and Middelburg, J. J.: Organic carbon reaction kinetics in bioturbated sediments, Geophysical Research Letters, 51, e2024GL110404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024GL110404</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Lacroix et al.(2021)Lacroix, Ilyina, Mathis, Laruelle, and Regnier</label><mixed-citation>Lacroix, F., Ilyina, T., Mathis, M., Laruelle, G. G., and Regnier, P.: Historical increases in land-derived nutrient inputs may alleviate effects of a changing physical climate on the oceanic carbon cycle, Global Change Biology, 27, 5491–5513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15822" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.15822</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Laurent et al.(2017)Laurent, Fennel, Cai, Huang, Barbero, and Wanninkhof</label><mixed-citation>Laurent, A., Fennel, K., Cai, W.-J., Huang, W.-J., Barbero, L., and Wanninkhof, R.: Eutrophication-induced acidification of coastal waters in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Insights into origin and processes from a coupled physical-biogeochemical model, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 946–956, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071881</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Levich and Tobias(1963)</label><mixed-citation>Levich, V. G. and Tobias, C. W.: Physicochemical hydrodynamics, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 110, 251C, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2425619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1149/1.2425619</ext-link>, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Levitus et al.(2005)Levitus, Antonov, and Boyer</label><mixed-citation>Levitus, S., Antonov, J., and Boyer, T.: Warming of the world ocean, 1955–2003, Geophysical Research Letters, 32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021592" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL021592</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Lewis and Wallace(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, E. and Wallace, D.: Program developed for CO2 system calculations, Tech. rep., Environmental System Science Data Infrastructure for a Virtual Ecosystem, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15485/1464255" ext-link-type="DOI">10.15485/1464255</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Liu et al.(2007)Liu, Chen, Tseng, Lin, Liu, and Snidvongs</label><mixed-citation> Liu, K.-K., Chen, Y.-J., Tseng, C.-M., Lin, I.-I., Liu, H.-B., and Snidvongs, A.: The significance of phytoplankton photo-adaptation and benthic–pelagic coupling to primary production in the South China Sea: Observations and numerical investigations, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 54, 1546–1574, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Lohse et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Lohse, L., Epping, E. H., Helder, W., and van Raaphorst, W.: Oxygen pore water profiles in continental shelf sediments of the North Sea: turbulent versus molecular diffusion, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 145, 63–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps145063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps145063</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Lorke and Peeters(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Lorke, A. and Peeters, F.: Toward a unified scaling relation for interfacial fluxes, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 36, 955–961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2903.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO2903.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Lorke et al.(2003)Lorke, Müller, Maerki, and Wüest</label><mixed-citation>Lorke, A., Müller, B., Maerki, M., and Wüest, A.: Breathing sediments: The control of diffusive transport across the sediment – water interface by periodic boundary-layer turbulence, Limnology and Oceanography, 48, 2077–2085, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.6.2077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2003.48.6.2077</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Luff et al.(2000)Luff, Wallmann, Grandel, and Schlüter</label><mixed-citation>Luff, R., Wallmann, K., Grandel, S., and Schlüter, M.: Numerical modeling of benthic processes in the deep Arabian Sea, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 47, 3039–3072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00058-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00058-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Manghnani et al.(1998)Manghnani, Morrison, Hopkins, and Böhm</label><mixed-citation>Manghnani, V., Morrison, J. M., Hopkins, T. S., and Böhm, E.: Advection of upwelled waters in the form of plumes off Oman during the Southwest Monsoon, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 45, 2027–2052, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(98)00062-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(98)00062-9</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Mauritsen et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Mauritsen, T., Bader, J., Becker, T., Behrens, J., Bittner, M., Brokopf, R., Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fast, I., Fiedler, S., Fläschner, D., Gayler, V., Giorgetta, M., Goll, D. S., Haak, H., Hagemann, S., Hedemann, C., Hohenegger, C., Ilyina, T., Jahns, T., Jimenéz‐de‐la‐Cuesta, D., Jungclaus, J., Kleinen, T., Kloster, S., Kracher, D., Kinne, S., Kleberg, D., Lasslop, G., Kornblueh, L., Marotzke, J., Matei, D., Meraner, K., Mikolajewicz, U., Modali, K., Möbis, B., Müller, W. A., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nam, C. C. W., Notz, D., Nyawira, S., Paulsen, H., Peters, K., Pincus, R., Pohlmann, H., Pongratz, J., Popp, M., Raddatz, T. J., Rast, S., Redler, R., Reick, C. H., Rohrschneider, T., Schemann, V., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R., Schulzweida, U., Six, K. D., Stein, L., Stemmler, I., Stevens, B., Von Storch, J., Tian, F., Voigt, A., Vrese, P., Wieners, K., Wilkenskjeld, S., Winkler, A., and Roeckner, E.: Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and its response to increasing CO<sub>2</sub>, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, 998–1038, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001400" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018MS001400</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Mayorga et al.(2010)Mayorga, Seitzinger, Harrison, Dumont, Beusen, Bouwman, Fekete, Kroeze, and Van Drecht</label><mixed-citation>Mayorga, E., Seitzinger, S. P., Harrison, J. A., Dumont, E., Beusen, A. H., Bouwman, A., Fekete, B. M., Kroeze, C., and Van Drecht, G.: Global nutrient export from WaterSheds 2 (NEWS 2): model development and implementation, Environmental Modelling &amp; Software, 25, 837–853, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.007</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>McGinnis et al.(2014)McGinnis, Sommer, Lorke, Glud, and Linke</label><mixed-citation>McGinnis, D. F., Sommer, S., Lorke, A., Glud, R. N., and Linke, P.: Quantifying tidally driven benthic oxygen exchange across permeable sediments: An aquatic eddy correlation study, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119, 6918–6932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010303" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010303</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Meysman et al.(2003)Meysman, Middelburg, Herman, and Heip</label><mixed-citation>Meysman, F. J., Middelburg, J. J., Herman, P. M., and Heip, C. H.: Reactive transport in surface sediments. II. Media: an object-oriented problem-solving environment for early diagenesis, Computers &amp; Geosciences, 29, 301–318, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(03)00007-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0098-3004(03)00007-4</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Middelburg(2019)</label><mixed-citation> Middelburg, J. J.: Marine carbon biogeochemistry: A primer for earth system scientists, Springer Nature, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Middelburg and Soetaert(2004)</label><mixed-citation> Middelburg, J. J. and Soetaert, K.: The role of sediments in shelf ecosystem dynamics, The Sea, 13, 353–373, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Middelburg et al.(1996)Middelburg, Soetaert, Herman, and Heip</label><mixed-citation>Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M., and Heip, C. H.: Denitrification in marine sediments: A model study, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 661–673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB02562" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96GB02562</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Middelburg et al.(1997)Middelburg, Soetaert, and Herman</label><mixed-citation>Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., and Herman, P. M.: Empirical relationships for use in global diagenetic models, Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 44, 327–344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00101-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00101-X</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Monin and Yaglom(1971)</label><mixed-citation> Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M.: Statistical Fluid Dynamics, vol. I and II, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,  ISBN 0262130629, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Moosdorf et al.(2024)Moosdorf, Tschaikowski, Kretschmer, and Reinecke</label><mixed-citation>Moosdorf, N., Tschaikowski, J., Kretschmer, D., and Reinecke, R.: A global coastal permeability dataset (CoPerm 1.0), Scientific Data, 11, 893, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03749-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-024-03749-4</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Morford and Emerson(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Morford, J. L. and Emerson, S.: The geochemistry of redox sensitive trace metals in sediments, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 63, 1735–1750, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00126-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00126-X</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Mucci(1983)</label><mixed-citation>Mucci, A.: The solubility of calcite and aragonite in seawater at various salinities, temperatures, and one atmosphere total pressure, American Journal of Science, 283, 780–799, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.283.7.780" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2475/ajs.283.7.780</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine(2022)</label><mixed-citation>National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: A Research Strategy for Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, ISBN 978-0-309-08761-2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17226/26278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17226/26278</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Naviaux et al.(2019)Naviaux, Subhas, Dong, Rollins, Liu, Byrne, Berelson, and Adkins</label><mixed-citation>Naviaux, J. D., Subhas, A. V., Dong, S., Rollins, N. E., Liu, X., Byrne, R. H., Berelson, W. M., and Adkins, J. F.: Calcite dissolution rates in seawater: Lab vs. in-situ measurements and inhibition by organic matter, Marine Chemistry, 215, 103 684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103684" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103684</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Niemistö and Lund-Hansen(2019)</label><mixed-citation> Niemistö, J. and Lund-Hansen, L. C.: Instantaneous effects of sediment resuspension on inorganic and organic benthic nutrient fluxes at a shallow water coastal site in the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea, Estuaries and Coasts, 42, 2054–2071, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Rackauckas and Nie(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Rackauckas, C. and Nie, Q.: Differentialequations. jl–a performant and feature-rich ecosystem for solving differential equations in julia, Journal of Open Research Software, 5,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5334/jors.151</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Redfield(1934)</label><mixed-citation> Redfield, A. C.: On the proportions of organic derivatives in sea water and their relation to the composition of plankton, vol. 1, University Press of Liverpool, Liverpool, 176–192, 1934.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Rothman(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Rothman, D. H.: Slow closure of Earth’s carbon cycle, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121, e2310998121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2310998121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2310998121</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Rowe et al.(1988)Rowe, Theroux, Phoel, Quinby, Wilke, Koschoreck, Whitledge, Falkowski, and Fray</label><mixed-citation>Rowe, G., Theroux, R., Phoel, W., Quinby, H., Wilke, R., Koschoreck, D., Whitledge, T., Falkowski, P., and Fray, C.: Benthic carbon budgets for the continental shelf south of New England, Continental Shelf Research, 8, 511–527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(88)90066-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0278-4343(88)90066-0</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Santschi et al.(1983)Santschi, Bower, Nyffeler, Azevedo, and Broecker</label><mixed-citation>Santschi, P. H., Bower, P., Nyffeler, U. P., Azevedo, A., and Broecker, W. S.: Estimates of the resistance to chemical transport posed by the deep-sea boundary layer 1, 2, Limnology and Oceanography, 28, 899–912, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1983.28.5.0899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1983.28.5.0899</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Smith et al.(2018)Smith Jr, Ruhl, Huffard, Messié, and Kahru</label><mixed-citation>Smith Jr., K. L., Ruhl, H. A., Huffard, C. L., Messié, M., and Kahru, M.: Episodic organic carbon fluxes from surface ocean to abyssal depths during long-term monitoring in NE Pacific, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 12235–12240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814559115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1814559115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Snelgrove et al.(2018)Snelgrove, Soetaert, Solan, Thrush, Wei, Danovaro, Fulweiler, Kitazato, Ingole, Norkko, Parkes, and Volkenborn</label><mixed-citation>Snelgrove, P. V., Soetaert, K., Solan, M., Thrush, S., Wei, C.-L., Danovaro, R., Fulweiler, R. W., Kitazato, H., Ingole, B., Norkko, A., Parkes, R. J., and Volkenborn, N.: Global carbon cycling on a heterogeneous seafloor, Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution, 33, 96–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.004</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Soetaert et al.(1996a)Soetaert, Herman, and Middelburg</label><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M., and Middelburg, J. J.: Dynamic response of deep-sea sediments to seasonal variations: A model, Limnology and Oceanography, 41, 1651–1668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1651</ext-link>, 1996a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Soetaert et al.(1996b)Soetaert, Herman, and Middelburg</label><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M., and Middelburg, J. J.: A model of early diagenetic processes from the shelf to abyssal depths, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 60, 1019–1040, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0</ext-link>, 1996b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Soetaert et al.(2000)Soetaert, Middelburg, Herman, and Buis</label><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K., Middelburg, J. J., Herman, P. M., and Buis, K.: On the coupling of benthic and pelagic biogeochemical models, Earth-Science Reviews, 51, 173–201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00004-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00004-0</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Stastna and Lamb(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Stastna, M. and Lamb, K. G.: Sediment resuspension mechanisms associated with internal waves in coastal waters, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004711" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JC004711</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Stock et al.(2020)Stock, Dunne, Fan, Ginoux, John, Krasting, Laufkötter, Paulot, and Zadeh</label><mixed-citation>Stock, C. A., Dunne, J. P., Fan, S., Ginoux, P., John, J., Krasting, J. P., Laufkötter, C., Paulot, F., and Zadeh, N.: Ocean biogeochemistry in GFDL's Earth System Model 4.1 and its response to increasing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2019MS002043, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS002043</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Stranne et al.(2022)Stranne, O’Regan, Hong, Brüchert, Ketzer, Thornton, and Jakobsson</label><mixed-citation>Stranne, C., O’Regan, M., Hong, W.-L., Brüchert, V., Ketzer, M., Thornton, B. F., and Jakobsson, M.: Anaerobic oxidation has a minor effect on mitigating seafloor methane emissions from gas hydrate dissociation, Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 3, 163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00490-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-022-00490-x</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Sulpis et al.(2018)Sulpis, Boudreau, Mucci, Jenkins, Trossman, Arbic, and Key</label><mixed-citation>Sulpis, O., Boudreau, B. P., Mucci, A., Jenkins, C., Trossman, D. S., Arbic, B. K., and Key, R. M.: Current CaCO<sub>3</sub> dissolution at the seafloor caused by anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub>, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 11700–11705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804250115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1804250115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Sulpis et al.(2019)Sulpis, Mucci, Boudreau, Barry, and Johnson</label><mixed-citation> Sulpis, O., Mucci, A., Boudreau, B. P., Barry, M. A., and Johnson, B. D.: Controlling the diffusive boundary layer thickness above the sediment–water interface in a thermostated rotating-disk reactor, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 17, 241–253, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Sulpis et al.(2021)Sulpis, Jeansson, Dinauer, Lauvset, and Middelburg</label><mixed-citation>Sulpis, O., Jeansson, E., Dinauer, A., Lauvset, S. K., and Middelburg, J. J.: Calcium carbonate dissolution patterns in the ocean, Nature Geoscience, 14, 423–428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00743-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-021-00743-y</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Sulpis et al.(2022)Sulpis, Humphreys, Wilhelmus, Carroll, Berelson, Menemenlis, Middelburg, and Adkins</label><mixed-citation>Sulpis, O., Humphreys, M. P., Wilhelmus, M. M., Carroll, D., Berelson, W. M., Menemenlis, D., Middelburg, J. J., and Adkins, J. F.: RADIv1: a non-steady-state early diagenetic model for ocean sediments in Julia and MATLAB/GNU Octave, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2105–2131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2105-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-2105-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Sulpis et al.(2023)Sulpis, Trossman, Holzer, Jeansson, Lauvset, and Middelburg</label><mixed-citation>Sulpis, O., Trossman, D. S., Holzer, M., Jeansson, E., Lauvset, S. K., and Middelburg, J. J.: Respiration patterns in the dark ocean, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 37, e2023GB007747, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GB007747</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Swart et al.(2019)Swart, Cole, Kharin, Lazare, Scinocca, Gillett, Anstey, Arora, Christian, Hanna, Jiao, Lee, Majaess, Saenko, Seiler, Seinen, Shao, Sigmond, Solheim, Von Salzen, Yang, and Winter</label><mixed-citation>Swart, N. C., Cole, J. N. S., Kharin, V. V., Lazare, M., Scinocca, J. F., Gillett, N. P., Anstey, J., Arora, V., Christian, J. R., Hanna, S., Jiao, Y., Lee, W. G., Majaess, F., Saenko, O. A., Seiler, C., Seinen, C., Shao, A., Sigmond, M., Solheim, L., von Salzen, K., Yang, D., and Winter, B.: The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4823–4873, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Séférian et al.(2020)Séférian, Berthet, Yool, Palmiéri, Bopp, Tagliabue, Kwiatkowski, Aumont, Christian, Dunne, Gehlen, Ilyina, John, Li, Long, Luo, Nakano, Romanou, Schwinger, Stock, Santana-Falcón, Takano, Tjiputra, Tsujino, Watanabe, Wu, Wu, and Yamamoto</label><mixed-citation> Séférian, R., Berthet, S., Yool, A., Palmiéri, J., Bopp, L., Tagliabue, A., Kwiatkowski, L., Aumont, O., Christian, J., Dunne, J., Gehlen, M., Ilyina, T., John, J. G., Li, H., Long, M. C., Luo, J. Y., Nakano, H., Romanou, A., Schwinger, J., Stock, C., Santana-Falcón, Y., Takano, Y., Tjiputra, J., Tsujino, H., Watanabe, M., Wu, T., Wu, F., and Yamamoto, A.: Tracking improvement in simulated marine biogeochemistry between CMIP5 and CMIP6, Current Climate Change Reports, 6, 95–119, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Tanioka and Matsumoto(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Tanioka, T. and Matsumoto, K.: Stability of marine organic matter respiration stoichiometry, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL085564, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085564" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL085564</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Terhaar et al.(2024)Terhaar, Goris, Müller, DeVries, Gruber, Hauck, Perez, and Séférian</label><mixed-citation>Terhaar, J., Goris, N., Müller, J. D., DeVries, T., Gruber, N., Hauck, J., Perez, F. F., and Séférian, R.: Assessment of global ocean biogeochemistry models for ocean carbon sink estimates in RECCAP2 and recommendations for future studies, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 16, e2023MS003840, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023MS003840</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Thamdrup and Canfield(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Thamdrup, B. and Canfield, D. E.: Pathways of carbon oxidation in continental margin sediments off central Chile, Limnology and Oceanography, 41, 1629–1650, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1629" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1629</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Therkildsen and Lomstein(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Therkildsen, M. S. and Lomstein, B. A.: Seasonal variation in net benthic C-mineralization in a shallow estuary, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 12, 131–142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1993.tb00025.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1574-6941.1993.tb00025.x</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Upton et al.(1993)Upton, Nedwell, Parkes, and Harvey</label><mixed-citation>Upton, A., Nedwell, D., Parkes, R. J., and Harvey, S. M.: Seasonal benthic microbial activity in the southern North Sea; oxygen uptake and sulphate reduction, Marine Ecology Progress Series,  273–281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps101273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps101273</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Van Cappellen and Wang(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Van Cappellen, P. and Wang, Y.: Cycling of iron and manganese in surface sediments; a general theory for the coupled transport and reaction of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, iron, and manganese, American Journal of Science, 296, 197–243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.296.3.197" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2475/ajs.296.3.197</ext-link>, 1996. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Van Dam et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Van Dam, B., Lehmann, N., Zeller, M. A., Neumann, A., Pröfrock, D., Lipka, M., Thomas, H., and Böttcher, M. E.: Benthic alkalinity fluxes from coastal sediments of the Baltic and North seas: comparing approaches and identifying knowledge gaps, Biogeosciences, 19, 3775–3789, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3775-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-19-3775-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>van der Zant et al.(2025)van der Zant, Humphreys, and Sulpis</label><mixed-citation>van der Zant, H. F., Humphreys, M. P., and Sulpis, O.: Radi.jl: the reactive-advective-diffusive-irrigative diagenetic sediment module in Julia (v2.0.0-rc.1), Zenodo [code and data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18386461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18386461</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Van Raaphorst et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Van Raaphorst, W., Kloosterhuis, H. T., Cramer, A., and Bakker, K. J.: Nutrient early diagenesis in the sandy sediments of the Dogger Bank area, North Sea: Pore water results, Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 26, 25–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90054-K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0077-7579(90)90054-K</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Voermans et al.(2018)Voermans, Ghisalberti, and Ivey</label><mixed-citation>Voermans, J. J., Ghisalberti, M., and Ivey, G. N.: A model for mass transport across the sediment-water interface, Water Resources Research, 54, 2799–2812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017WR022418</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Voynova et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Voynova, Y. G., Petersen, W., Gehrung, M., Aßmann, S., and King, A. L.: Intertidal regions changing coastal alkalinity: The Wadden Sea-North Sea tidally coupled bioreactor, Limnology and Oceanography, 64, 1135–1149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.11103</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx119"><label>Welch(1938)</label><mixed-citation>Welch, B. L.: The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal, Biometrika, 29, 350–362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2332010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/2332010</ext-link>, 1938.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx120"><label>Westrich and Berner(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Westrich, J. T. and Berner, R. A.: The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: The G model tested 1, Limnology and Oceanography, 29, 236–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0236" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0236</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx121"><label>Witte and Pfannkuche(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Witte, U. and Pfannkuche, O.: High rates of benthic carbon remineralisation in the abyssal Arabian Sea, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 47, 2785–2804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00049-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00049-7</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx122"><label>Yool et al.(2013)Yool, Popova, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>Yool, A., Popova, E. E., and Anderson, T. R.: MEDUSA-2.0: an intermediate complexity biogeochemical model of the marine carbon cycle for climate change and ocean acidification studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1767–1811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx123"><label>Yuan-Hui and Gregory(1974)</label><mixed-citation>Yuan-Hui, L. and Gregory, S.: Diffusion of ions in sea water and in deep-sea sediments, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 38, 703–714, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(74)90145-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(74)90145-8</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx124"><label>Zeppilli et al.(2016)Zeppilli, Pusceddu, Trincardi, and Danovaro</label><mixed-citation>Zeppilli, D., Pusceddu, A., Trincardi, F., and Danovaro, R.: Seafloor heterogeneity influences the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships in the deep sea, Scientific reports, 6, 26352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26352" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep26352</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>RADIv2: an adaptable and versatile diagenetic model for coastal and open-ocean sediments</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Friedlingstein et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Bakker, D. C. E., Hauck, J., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Luijkx, I. T., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Anthoni, P., Barbero, L., Bates, N. R., Becker, M., Bellouin, N., Decharme, B., Bopp, L., Brasika, I. B. M., Cadule, P., Chamberlain, M. A., Chandra, N., Chau, T.-T.-T., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Cronin, M., Dou, X., Enyo, K., Evans, W., Falk, S., Feely, R. A., Feng, L., Ford, D. J., Gasser, T., Ghattas, J., Gkritzalis, T., Grassi, G., Gregor, L., Gruber, N., Gürses, Ö., Harris, I., Hefner, M., Heinke, J., Houghton, R. A., Hurtt, G. C., Iida, Y., Ilyina, T., Jacobson, A. R., Jain, A., Jarníková, T., Jersild, A., Jiang, F., Jin, Z., Joos, F., Kato, E., Keeling, R. F., Kennedy, D., Klein Goldewijk, K., Knauer, J., Korsbakken, J. I., Körtzinger, A., Lan, X., Lefèvre, N., Li, H., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Ma, L., Marland, G., Mayot, N., McGuire, P. C., McKinley, G. A., Meyer, G., Morgan, E. J., Munro, D. R., Nakaoka, S.-I., Niwa, Y., O'Brien, K. M., Olsen, A., Omar, A. M., Ono, T., Paulsen, M., Pierrot, D., Pocock, K., Poulter, B., Powis, C. M., Rehder, G., Resplandy, L., Robertson, E., Rödenbeck, C., Rosan, T. M., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Smallman, T. L., Smith, S. M., Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Sun, Q., Sutton, A. J., Sweeney, C., Takao, S., Tans, P. P., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Tsujino, H., Tubiello, F., van der Werf, G. R., van Ooijen, E., Wanninkhof, R., Watanabe, M., Wimart-Rousseau, C., Yang, D., Yang, X., Yuan, W., Yue, X., Zaehle, S., Zeng, J., and Zheng, B.: Global Carbon Budget 2023, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Anderson(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, L. A.: On the hydrogen and oxygen content of marine phytoplankton,
Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic research papers, 42, 1675–1680,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00072-E" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00072-E</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Anderson et al.(1994)Anderson, Rowe, Kemp, Trumbores, and
Biscaye</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, R., Rowe, G., Kemp, P., Trumbores, S., and Biscaye, P.: Carbon budget
for the mid-slope depocenter of the Middle Atlantic Bight, Deep Sea Research
Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 41, 669–703,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(94)90040-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(94)90040-X</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Archer and Devol(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Archer, D. and Devol, A.: Benthic oxygen fluxes on the Washington shelf and
slope: A comparison of in situ microelectrode and chamber flux measurements,
Limnology and Oceanography, 37, 614–629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.3.0614" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.3.0614</a>,
1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Archer et al.(2002)Archer, Morford, and Emerson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Archer, D., Morford, J., and Emerson, S.: A model of suboxic sedimentary
diagenesis suitable for automatic tuning and gridded global domains, Global
Biogeochemical Cycles, 16, 17–1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001288" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001288</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Arndt et al.(2013)Arndt, Jørgensen, LaRowe, Middelburg, Pancost,
and Regnier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arndt, S., Jørgensen, B. B., LaRowe, D. E., Middelburg, J., Pancost, R., and
Regnier, P.: Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in marine
sediments: A review and synthesis, Earth-Science Reviews, 123, 53–86,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.02.008</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Aumont and Bopp(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aumont, O. and Bopp, L.: Globalizing results from ocean in situ iron
fertilization studies, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002591" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002591</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Aumont et al.(2015)Aumont, Éthé, Tagliabue, Bopp, and
Gehlen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Berelson et al.(2002)Berelson, Johnson, Coale, and
Li</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berelson, W., Johnson, K., Coale, K., and Li, H.-C.: Organic matter diagenesis
in the sediments of the San Pedro Shelf along a transect affected by sewage
effluent, Continental Shelf Research, 22, 1101–1115,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(01)00120-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(01)00120-0</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Berelson et al.(2003)Berelson, McManus, Coale, Johnson, Burdige,
Kilgore, Colodner, Chavez, Kudela, and Boucher</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berelson, W., McManus, J., Coale, K., Johnson, K., Burdige, D., Kilgore, T.,
Colodner, D., Chavez, F., Kudela, R., and Boucher, J.: A time series of
benthic flux measurements from Monterey Bay, CA, Continental Shelf Research,
23, 457–481, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(03)00009-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(03)00009-8</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Berelson et al.(1994)Berelson, Hammond, McManus, and
Kilgore</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berelson, W. M., Hammond, D. E., McManus, J., and Kilgore, T. E.: Dissolution
kinetics of calcium carbonate in equatorial Pacific sediments, Global
Biogeochemical Cycles, 8, 219–235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03394" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03394</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Bezanson et al.(2017)Bezanson, Edelman, Karpinski, and
Shah</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., and Shah, V. B.: Julia: A fresh
approach to numerical computing, SIAM Review, 59, 65–98,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Boudreau(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boudreau, B. P.: A method-of-lines code for carbon and nutrient diagenesis in
aquatic sediments, Computers &amp; Geosciences, 22, 479–496,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(95)00115-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(95)00115-8</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Boudreau(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boudreau, B. P.: Diagenetic models and their implementation, vol. 505, Springer
Berlin, ISBN-13 97S-3-642-64399-6, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Boudreau(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boudreau, B. P.: Carbonate dissolution rates at the deep ocean floor,
Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 744–748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054231" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054231</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Brenner et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brenner, H., Braeckman, U., Le Guitton, M., and Meysman, F. J.: The impact of sedimentary alkalinity release on the water column CO<sub>2</sub> system in the North Sea, Biogeosciences, 13, 841–863, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-841-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-841-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Brink et al.(1998)Brink, Arnone, Coble, Flagg, Jones, Kindle, Lee,
Phinney, Wood, Yentsch, and Young</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brink, K., Arnone, R., Coble, P., Flagg, C., Jones, B., Kindle, J., Lee, C.,
Phinney, D., Wood, M., Yentsch, C., and Young, D.: Monsoons boost biological
productivity in Arabian Sea, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union,
79, 165–169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00120</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Burt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burt, W., Thomas, H., Pätsch, J., Omar, A., Schrum, C., Daewel, U., Brenner, H., and de Baar, H.: Radium isotopes as a tracer of sediment-water column exchange in the North Sea, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 28, 786–804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004825" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004825</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Caldeira and Wickett(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Caldeira, K. and Wickett, M. E.: Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH, Nature,
425, 365–365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Canfield et al.(1993)Canfield, Thamdrup, and
Hansen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Canfield, D. E., Thamdrup, B., and Hansen, J. W.: The anaerobic degradation of
organic matter in Danish coastal sediments: iron reduction, manganese
reduction, and sulfate reduction, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 57,
3867–3883, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(93)90340-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(93)90340-3</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Canfield et al.(2005)Canfield, Kristensen, and
Thamdrup</label><mixed-citation>
      
Canfield, D. E., Kristensen, E., and Thamdrup, B.: The iron and manganese
cycles,   Advances in marine biology,   48,  269–312,
2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Carroll et al.(2020)Carroll, Menemenlis, Adkins, Bowman, Brix,
Dutkiewicz, Fenty, Gierach, Hill, Jahn, Landschützer, Lauderdale, Liu,
Manizza, Naviaux, Rödenbeck, Schimel, Van Der Stocken, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carroll, D., Menemenlis, D., Adkins, J. F., Bowman, K. W., Brix, H.,
Dutkiewicz, S., Fenty, I., Gierach, M. M., Hill, C., Jahn, O., Landschützer,
P., Lauderdale, J. M., Liu, J., Manizza, M., Naviaux, J. D., Rödenbeck, C.,
Schimel, D. S., Van Der Stocken, T., and Zhang, H.: Seasonal to multi-decadal
air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes from the data-constrained ECCO-Darwin global ocean
biogeochemistry model: Estimates of Seasonal to Multidecadal Surface Ocean
pCO<sub>2</sub> and Air-Sea CO<sub>2</sub> Flux, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems,
12, e2019MS001888, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001888" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001888</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Cheng et al.(2022)Cheng, Von Schuckmann, Abraham, Trenberth, Mann,
Zanna, England, Zika, Fasullo, Yu, Pan, Zhu, Newsom, Bronselaer, and
Lin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, L., Von Schuckmann, K., Abraham, J. P., Trenberth, K. E., Mann, M. E.,
Zanna, L., England, M. H., Zika, J. D., Fasullo, J. T., Yu, Y., Pan, Y., Zhu,
J., Newsom, E. R., Bronselaer, B., and Lin, X.: Past and future ocean
warming, Nature Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 3, 776–794,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00345-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00345-1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Cheriton et al.(2014)Cheriton, McPhee-Shaw, Shaw, Stanton,
Bellingham, and Storlazzi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheriton, O. M., McPhee-Shaw, E. E., Shaw, W. J., Stanton, T. P., Bellingham,
J. G., and Storlazzi, C. D.: Suspended particulate layers and internal waves
over the southern Monterey Bay continental shelf: an important control on
shelf mud belts?, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119, 428–444,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009360" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009360</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Christensen(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Christensen, J. P.: Sulfate reduction and carbon oxidation rates in continental
shelf sediments, an examination of offshelf carbon transport, Continental
Shelf Research, 9, 223–246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(89)90025-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(89)90025-3</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Christensen et al.(1984)Christensen, Devol, and
Smethie Jr</label><mixed-citation>
      
Christensen, J. P., Devol, A. H., and Smethie Jr, W. M.: Biological enhancement
of solute exchange between sediments and bottom water on the Washington
continental shelf, Continental Shelf Research, 3, 9–23,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(84)90040-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(84)90040-2</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Christensen et al.(1987)Christensen, Smethie Jr, and
Devol</label><mixed-citation>
      
Christensen, J. P., Smethie Jr, W. M., and Devol, A. H.: Benthic nutrient
regeneration and denitrification on the Washington continental shelf, Deep
Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 34, 1027–1047,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90051-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90051-3</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>IPCC(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
IPCC:  Climate Change 2023:
Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:   Lee,  H. and  Romero,  J., IPCC,
Geneva, Switzerland, <a href="https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>De Borger et al.(2021)De Borger, Braeckman, and
Soetaert</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Borger, E., Braeckman, U., and Soetaert, K.: Rapid organic matter cycling in
North Sea sediments, Continental Shelf Research, 214, 104327,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2020.104327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2020.104327</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>DeVries et al.(2023)DeVries, Yamamoto, Wanninkhof, Gruber, Hauck,
Müller, Bopp, Carroll, Carter, Chau, Doney, Gehlen, Gloege, Gregor, Henson,
Kim, Iida, Ilyina, Landschützer, Le Quéré, Munro, Nissen, Patara, Pérez,
Resplandy, Rodgers, Schwinger, Séférian, Sicardi, Terhaar, Triñanes,
Tsujino, Watson, Yasunaka, and Zeng</label><mixed-citation>
      
DeVries, T., Yamamoto, K., Wanninkhof, R., Gruber, N., Hauck, J., Müller,
J. D., Bopp, L., Carroll, D., Carter, B., Chau, T., Doney, S. C., Gehlen, M.,
Gloege, L., Gregor, L., Henson, S., Kim, J. H., Iida, Y., Ilyina, T.,
Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Munro, D., Nissen, C., Patara, L., Pérez,
F. F., Resplandy, L., Rodgers, K. B., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Sicardi,
V., Terhaar, J., Triñanes, J., Tsujino, H., Watson, A., Yasunaka, S., and
Zeng, J.: Magnitude, trends, and variability of the global ocean carbon sink
from 1985 to 2018, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 37, e2023GB007780,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007780" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007780</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Diamessis and Redekopp(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Diamessis, P. J. and Redekopp, L. G.: Numerical investigation of solitary
internal wave-induced global instability in shallow water benthic boundary
layers, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 36, 784–812,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2900.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2900.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Diaz and Rosenberg(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Diaz, R. J. and Rosenberg, R.: Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine
ecosystems, Science, 321, 926–929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156401</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Doney et al.(2009)Doney, Fabry, Feely, and Kleypas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Doney, S. C., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., and Kleypas, J. A.: Ocean
acidification: the other CO<sub>2</sub> problem, Annual Review of Marine Science, 1,
169–192, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Dong et al.(2019)Dong, Berelson, Rollins, Subhas, Naviaux, Celestian,
Liu, Turaga, Kemnitz, Byrne, and Adkins</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dong, S., Berelson, W. M., Rollins, N. E., Subhas, A. V., Naviaux, J. D.,
Celestian, A. J., Liu, X., Turaga, N., Kemnitz, N. J., Byrne, R. H., and
Adkins, J. F.: Aragonite dissolution kinetics and calcite/aragonite ratios in
sinking and suspended particles in the North Pacific, Earth and Planetary
Science Letters, 515, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.03.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.03.016</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Egger et al.(2018)Egger, Riedinger, Mogollón, and
Jørgensen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Egger, M., Riedinger, N., Mogollón, J. M., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Global
diffusive fluxes of methane in marine sediments, Nature Geoscience, 11,
421–425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0122-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0122-8</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Emerson and Bender(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Emerson, S. and Bender, M.: Carbon fluxes at the sediment-water interface of
the deep-sea: calcium carbonate preservation, Journal of Marine Research, 39, 139–162, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Epping et al.(2002)Epping, van der Zee, Soetaert, and
Helder</label><mixed-citation>
      
Epping, E., van der Zee, C., Soetaert, K., and Helder, W.: On the oxidation and
burial of organic carbon in sediments of the Iberian margin and Nazaré
Canyon (NE Atlantic), Progress in Oceanography, 52, 399–431, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Feely et al.(2004)Feely, Sabine, Lee, Berelson, Kleypas, Fabry, and
Millero</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feely, R. A., Sabine, C. L., Lee, K., Berelson, W., Kleypas, J., Fabry, V. J.,
and Millero, F. J.: Impact of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> on the CaCO<sub>3</sub> system in the
oceans, Science, 305, 362–366, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097329" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097329</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Feldt and Stukalov(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feldt, R. and Stukalov, A.: Blackboxoptim.jl,   Github, <a href="https://github.com/robertfeldt/BlackBoxOptim.jl" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 February 2026), 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Fennel and Testa(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fennel, K. and Testa, J. M.: Biogeochemical controls on coastal hypoxia, Annual
Review of Marine Science, 11, 105–130,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010318-095138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010318-095138</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Fiadeiro and Veronis(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fiadeiro, M. E. and Veronis, G.: On weighted-mean schemes for the
finite-difference approximation to the advection-diffusion equation, Tellus,
29, 512–522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1977.tb00763.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1977.tb00763.x</a>, 1977.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Fossing(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fossing, H.: Sulfate reduction in shelf sediments in the upwelling region off
Central Peru, Continental Shelf Research, 10, 355–367,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(90)90056-R" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(90)90056-R</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Fossing et al.(2004)Fossing, Berg, Thamdrup, Rysgaard, Sorensen, and
Nielsen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fossing, H., Berg, P., Thamdrup, B., Rysgaard, S., Sorensen, H. M., and
Nielsen, K.: A model set-up for an oxygen and nutrient flux model for Aarhus
Bay (Denmark), NERI technical report, 483,  ISBN 87-7772-793-2, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Froelich et al.(1979)Froelich, Klinkhammer, Bender, Luedtke, Heath,
Cullen, Dauphin, Hammond, Hartman, and Maynard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Froelich, P., Klinkhammer, G., Bender, M. L., Luedtke, N., Heath, G. R.,
Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., and Maynard, V.: Early
oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern equatorial
Atlantic: suboxic diagenesis, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 43,
1075–1090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Glud et al.(2007)Glud, Berg, Fossing, and
Jørgensen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Glud, R. N., Berg, P., Fossing, H., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Effect of the
diffusive boundary layer on benthic mineralization and O<sub>2</sub> distribution: A
theoretical model analysis, Limnology and Oceanography, 52, 547–557,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0547" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0547</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Grebmeier and McRoy(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grebmeier, J. M. and McRoy, C. P.: Pelagic-benthic coupling on the shelf of the
northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. III. Benthic food supply and carbon
cycling, Marine Ecology Progress Series,  79–91,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps053079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps053079</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Hedges et al.(2002)Hedges, Baldock, Gélinas, Lee, Peterson, and
Wakeham</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hedges, J., Baldock, J., Gélinas, Y., Lee, C., Peterson, M., and Wakeham,
S.: The biochemical and elemental compositions of marine plankton: A NMR
perspective, Marine Chemistry, 78, 47–63,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(02)00009-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(02)00009-9</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Heinze et al.(1999)Heinze, Maier-Reimer, Winguth, and
Archer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heinze, C., Maier-Reimer, E., Winguth, A. M., and Archer, D.: A global oceanic
sediment model for long-term climate studies, Global Biogeochemical Cycles,
13, 221–250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98GB02812" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98GB02812</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Hinrichs et al.(1999)Hinrichs, Hayes, Sylva, Brewer, and
DeLong</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hinrichs, K.-U., Hayes, J. M., Sylva, S. P., Brewer, P. G., and DeLong, E. F.:
Methane-consuming archaebacteria in marine sediments, Nature, 398, 802–805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/19751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/19751</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Hosegood and van Haren(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hosegood, P. and van Haren, H.: Near-bed solibores over the continental slope
in the Faeroe-Shetland Channel, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in
Oceanography, 51, 2943–2971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.09.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.09.016</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Huettel et al.(2014)Huettel, Berg, and Kostka</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huettel, M., Berg, P., and Kostka, J. E.: Benthic exchange and biogeochemical
cycling in permeable sediments, Annual review of marine Science, 6, 23–51,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-051413-012706" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-051413-012706</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Humphreys et al.(2022a)Humphreys, Lewis, Sharp, and
Pierrot</label><mixed-citation>
      
Humphreys, M. P., Lewis, E. R., Sharp, J. D., and Pierrot, D.: PyCO2SYS v1.8: marine carbonate system calculations in Python, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 15–43, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-15-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-15-2022</a>, 2022a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Humphreys et al.(2022b)Humphreys, Orr, van Heuven,
Pierrot, Lewis, and Wallace</label><mixed-citation>
      
Humphreys, M. P., Orr, J. C., van Heuven, S. M., Pierrot, D., Lewis, E. R., and
Wallace, D. W.: mvdh7/CO2System.jl: CO2System.jl: CO2SYS in Julia (v2.0.5-jl.1), Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6395674" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6395674</a>,
2022b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Ilyina et al.(2013)Ilyina, Six, Segschneider, Maier-Reimer, Li, and
Núñez-Riboni</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ilyina, T., Six, K. D., Segschneider, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Li, H., and
Núñez-Riboni, I.: Global ocean biogeochemistry model HAMOCC: Model
architecture and performance as component of the MPI-Earth system model in
different CMIP5 experimental realizations, Journal of Advances in Modeling
Earth Systems, 5, 287–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000178" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000178</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Ingle et al.(1973)Ingle, Culberson, Hawley, and
Pytkowicz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ingle, S., Culberson, C., Hawley, J., and Pytkowicz, R.: The solubility of
calcite in seawater at atmospheric pressure and 35% permil; salinity, Marine
Chemistry, 1, 295–307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(73)90019-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(73)90019-4</a>, 1973.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>ITTC(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
ITTC: Fresh Water and Seawater Properties – 7.5-02-01-03, <a href="https://www.ittc.info/media/11764/75-02-01-03.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 18 February 2026), 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Jorgensen(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jorgensen, B. B.: A comparison of methods for the quantification of bacterial
sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments, Geomicrobiology Journal, 1,
11–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01490457809377721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01490457809377721</a>, 1978.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Jørgensen(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jørgensen, B. B.: Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed – the role
of sulphate reduction, Nature, 296, 643–645, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Jørgensen et al.(2022)Jørgensen, Wenzhöfer, Egger, and
Glud</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jørgensen, B. B., Wenzhöfer, F., Egger, M., and Glud, R. N.: Sediment
oxygen consumption: Role in the global marine carbon cycle, Earth-science
reviews, 228, 103987, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103987</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Keeling et al.(2010)Keeling, Körtzinger, and
Gruber</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keeling, R. F., Körtzinger, A., and Gruber, N.: Ocean deoxygenation in a
warming world, Annual Review of Marine Science, 2, 199–229,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Kuderer and Middelburg(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuderer, M. and Middelburg, J. J.: Organic carbon reaction kinetics in
bioturbated sediments, Geophysical Research Letters, 51, e2024GL110404,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110404" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110404</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Lacroix et al.(2021)Lacroix, Ilyina, Mathis, Laruelle, and
Regnier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lacroix, F., Ilyina, T., Mathis, M., Laruelle, G. G., and Regnier, P.:
Historical increases in land-derived nutrient inputs may alleviate effects of
a changing physical climate on the oceanic carbon cycle, Global Change
Biology, 27, 5491–5513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15822" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15822</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Laurent et al.(2017)Laurent, Fennel, Cai, Huang, Barbero, and
Wanninkhof</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laurent, A., Fennel, K., Cai, W.-J., Huang, W.-J., Barbero, L., and Wanninkhof,
R.: Eutrophication-induced acidification of coastal waters in the northern
Gulf of Mexico: Insights into origin and processes from a coupled
physical-biogeochemical model, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 946–956,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071881</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Levich and Tobias(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Levich, V. G. and Tobias, C. W.: Physicochemical hydrodynamics, Journal of The
Electrochemical Society, 110, 251C, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2425619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2425619</a>, 1963.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Levitus et al.(2005)Levitus, Antonov, and Boyer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Levitus, S., Antonov, J., and Boyer, T.: Warming of the world ocean,
1955–2003, Geophysical Research Letters, 32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021592" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021592</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Lewis and Wallace(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lewis, E. and Wallace, D.: Program developed for CO2 system calculations, Tech.
rep., Environmental System Science Data Infrastructure for a Virtual
Ecosystem, <a href="https://doi.org/10.15485/1464255" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15485/1464255</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Liu et al.(2007)Liu, Chen, Tseng, Lin, Liu, and
Snidvongs</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, K.-K., Chen, Y.-J., Tseng, C.-M., Lin, I.-I., Liu, H.-B., and Snidvongs,
A.: The significance of phytoplankton photo-adaptation and benthic–pelagic
coupling to primary production in the South China Sea: Observations and
numerical investigations, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in
Oceanography, 54, 1546–1574, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Lohse et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lohse, L., Epping, E. H., Helder, W., and van Raaphorst, W.: Oxygen pore water profiles in continental shelf sediments of the North Sea: turbulent versus molecular diffusion, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 145, 63–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps145063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps145063</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Lorke and Peeters(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lorke, A. and Peeters, F.: Toward a unified scaling relation for interfacial
fluxes, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 36, 955–961,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2903.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2903.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Lorke et al.(2003)Lorke, Müller, Maerki, and
Wüest</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lorke, A., Müller, B., Maerki, M., and Wüest, A.: Breathing sediments:
The control of diffusive transport across the sediment – water interface by
periodic boundary-layer turbulence, Limnology and Oceanography, 48,
2077–2085, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.6.2077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.6.2077</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Luff et al.(2000)Luff, Wallmann, Grandel, and
Schlüter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luff, R., Wallmann, K., Grandel, S., and Schlüter, M.: Numerical modeling
of benthic processes in the deep Arabian Sea, Deep Sea Research Part II:
Topical Studies in Oceanography, 47, 3039–3072,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00058-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00058-8</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Manghnani et al.(1998)Manghnani, Morrison, Hopkins, and
Böhm</label><mixed-citation>
      
Manghnani, V., Morrison, J. M., Hopkins, T. S., and Böhm, E.: Advection of
upwelled waters in the form of plumes off Oman during the Southwest Monsoon,
Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 45, 2027–2052,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(98)00062-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(98)00062-9</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Mauritsen et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mauritsen, T., Bader, J., Becker, T., Behrens, J., Bittner, M., Brokopf, R.,
Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fast, I., Fiedler, S.,
Fläschner, D., Gayler, V., Giorgetta, M., Goll, D. S., Haak, H., Hagemann,
S., Hedemann, C., Hohenegger, C., Ilyina, T., Jahns, T.,
Jimenéz‐de‐la‐Cuesta, D., Jungclaus, J., Kleinen, T., Kloster, S.,
Kracher, D., Kinne, S., Kleberg, D., Lasslop, G., Kornblueh, L., Marotzke,
J., Matei, D., Meraner, K., Mikolajewicz, U., Modali, K., Möbis, B.,
Müller, W. A., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nam, C. C. W., Notz, D., Nyawira, S.,
Paulsen, H., Peters, K., Pincus, R., Pohlmann, H., Pongratz, J., Popp, M.,
Raddatz, T. J., Rast, S., Redler, R., Reick, C. H., Rohrschneider, T.,
Schemann, V., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R., Schulzweida, U., Six, K. D., Stein,
L., Stemmler, I., Stevens, B., Von Storch, J., Tian, F., Voigt, A., Vrese,
P., Wieners, K., Wilkenskjeld, S., Winkler, A., and Roeckner, E.:
Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and
its response to increasing CO<sub>2</sub>, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth
Systems, 11, 998–1038, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001400" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001400</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Mayorga et al.(2010)Mayorga, Seitzinger, Harrison, Dumont, Beusen,
Bouwman, Fekete, Kroeze, and Van Drecht</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mayorga, E., Seitzinger, S. P., Harrison, J. A., Dumont, E., Beusen, A. H.,
Bouwman, A., Fekete, B. M., Kroeze, C., and Van Drecht, G.: Global nutrient
export from WaterSheds 2 (NEWS 2): model development and implementation,
Environmental Modelling &amp; Software, 25, 837–853,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.007</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>McGinnis et al.(2014)McGinnis, Sommer, Lorke, Glud, and
Linke</label><mixed-citation>
      
McGinnis, D. F., Sommer, S., Lorke, A., Glud, R. N., and Linke, P.: Quantifying
tidally driven benthic oxygen exchange across permeable sediments: An aquatic
eddy correlation study, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119,
6918–6932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010303" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010303</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Meysman et al.(2003)Meysman, Middelburg, Herman, and
Heip</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meysman, F. J., Middelburg, J. J., Herman, P. M., and Heip, C. H.: Reactive
transport in surface sediments. II. Media: an object-oriented problem-solving
environment for early diagenesis, Computers &amp; Geosciences, 29, 301–318,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(03)00007-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(03)00007-4</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Middelburg(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Middelburg, J. J.: Marine carbon biogeochemistry: A primer for earth system
scientists, Springer Nature, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Middelburg and Soetaert(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Middelburg, J. J. and Soetaert, K.: The role of sediments in shelf ecosystem
dynamics, The Sea, 13, 353–373, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Middelburg et al.(1996)Middelburg, Soetaert, Herman, and
Heip</label><mixed-citation>
      
Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M., and Heip, C. H.:
Denitrification in marine sediments: A model study, Global Biogeochemical
Cycles, 10, 661–673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB02562" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB02562</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Middelburg et al.(1997)Middelburg, Soetaert, and
Herman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., and Herman, P. M.: Empirical relationships for
use in global diagenetic models, Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic
Research Papers, 44, 327–344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00101-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00101-X</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Monin and Yaglom(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M.: Statistical Fluid Dynamics, vol. I and II, MIT
Press, Cambridge, MA,  ISBN 0262130629, 1971.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Moosdorf et al.(2024)Moosdorf, Tschaikowski, Kretschmer, and
Reinecke</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moosdorf, N., Tschaikowski, J., Kretschmer, D., and Reinecke, R.: A global
coastal permeability dataset (CoPerm 1.0), Scientific Data, 11, 893,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03749-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03749-4</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Morford and Emerson(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morford, J. L. and Emerson, S.: The geochemistry of redox sensitive trace
metals in sediments, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 63, 1735–1750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00126-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00126-X</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Mucci(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mucci, A.: The solubility of calcite and aragonite in seawater at various
salinities, temperatures, and one atmosphere total pressure, American Journal
of Science, 283, 780–799, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.283.7.780" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.283.7.780</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: A Research Strategy for
Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration, The National Academies
Press, Washington, DC, ISBN 978-0-309-08761-2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.17226/26278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17226/26278</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Naviaux et al.(2019)Naviaux, Subhas, Dong, Rollins, Liu, Byrne,
Berelson, and Adkins</label><mixed-citation>
      
Naviaux, J. D., Subhas, A. V., Dong, S., Rollins, N. E., Liu, X., Byrne, R. H.,
Berelson, W. M., and Adkins, J. F.: Calcite dissolution rates in seawater:
Lab vs. in-situ measurements and inhibition by organic matter, Marine
Chemistry, 215, 103&thinsp;684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103684" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103684</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Niemistö and Lund-Hansen(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niemistö, J. and Lund-Hansen, L. C.: Instantaneous effects of sediment
resuspension on inorganic and organic benthic nutrient fluxes at a shallow
water coastal site in the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea, Estuaries and Coasts,
42, 2054–2071, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Rackauckas and Nie(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rackauckas, C. and Nie, Q.: Differentialequations. jl–a performant and
feature-rich ecosystem for solving differential equations in julia, Journal
of Open Research Software, 5,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.151" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.151</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Redfield(1934)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Redfield, A. C.: On the proportions of organic derivatives in sea water and
their relation to the composition of plankton, vol. 1, University Press of
Liverpool, Liverpool, 176–192, 1934.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Rothman(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rothman, D. H.: Slow closure of Earth’s carbon cycle, Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 121, e2310998121,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2310998121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2310998121</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Rowe et al.(1988)Rowe, Theroux, Phoel, Quinby, Wilke, Koschoreck,
Whitledge, Falkowski, and Fray</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rowe, G., Theroux, R., Phoel, W., Quinby, H., Wilke, R., Koschoreck, D.,
Whitledge, T., Falkowski, P., and Fray, C.: Benthic carbon budgets for the
continental shelf south of New England, Continental Shelf Research, 8,
511–527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(88)90066-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(88)90066-0</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Santschi et al.(1983)Santschi, Bower, Nyffeler, Azevedo, and
Broecker</label><mixed-citation>
      
Santschi, P. H., Bower, P., Nyffeler, U. P., Azevedo, A., and Broecker, W. S.:
Estimates of the resistance to chemical transport posed by the deep-sea
boundary layer 1, 2, Limnology and Oceanography, 28, 899–912,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1983.28.5.0899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1983.28.5.0899</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Smith et al.(2018)Smith Jr, Ruhl, Huffard, Messié, and
Kahru</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith Jr., K. L., Ruhl, H. A., Huffard, C. L., Messié, M., and Kahru, M.:
Episodic organic carbon fluxes from surface ocean to abyssal depths during
long-term monitoring in NE Pacific, Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 115, 12235–12240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814559115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814559115</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Snelgrove et al.(2018)Snelgrove, Soetaert, Solan, Thrush, Wei,
Danovaro, Fulweiler, Kitazato, Ingole, Norkko, Parkes, and
Volkenborn</label><mixed-citation>
      
Snelgrove, P. V., Soetaert, K., Solan, M., Thrush, S., Wei, C.-L., Danovaro,
R., Fulweiler, R. W., Kitazato, H., Ingole, B., Norkko, A., Parkes, R. J.,
and Volkenborn, N.: Global carbon cycling on a heterogeneous seafloor, Trends
in Ecology &amp; Evolution, 33, 96–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.004</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Soetaert et al.(1996a)Soetaert, Herman, and
Middelburg</label><mixed-citation>
      
Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M., and Middelburg, J. J.: Dynamic response of
deep-sea sediments to seasonal variations: A model, Limnology and
Oceanography, 41, 1651–1668, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1651" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1651</a>,
1996a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Soetaert et al.(1996b)Soetaert, Herman, and
Middelburg</label><mixed-citation>
      
Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M., and Middelburg, J. J.: A model of early diagenetic
processes from the shelf to abyssal depths, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,
60, 1019–1040, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0</a>, 1996b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Soetaert et al.(2000)Soetaert, Middelburg, Herman, and
Buis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Soetaert, K., Middelburg, J. J., Herman, P. M., and Buis, K.: On the coupling
of benthic and pelagic biogeochemical models, Earth-Science Reviews, 51,
173–201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00004-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00004-0</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Stastna and Lamb(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stastna, M. and Lamb, K. G.: Sediment resuspension mechanisms associated with
internal waves in coastal waters, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans,
113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004711" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004711</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Stock et al.(2020)Stock, Dunne, Fan, Ginoux, John, Krasting,
Laufkötter, Paulot, and Zadeh</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stock, C. A., Dunne, J. P., Fan, S., Ginoux, P., John, J., Krasting, J. P.,
Laufkötter, C., Paulot, F., and Zadeh, N.: Ocean biogeochemistry in
GFDL's Earth System Model 4.1 and its response to increasing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>,
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2019MS002043,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002043</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Stranne et al.(2022)Stranne, O’Regan, Hong, Brüchert, Ketzer,
Thornton, and Jakobsson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stranne, C., O’Regan, M., Hong, W.-L., Brüchert, V., Ketzer, M.,
Thornton, B. F., and Jakobsson, M.: Anaerobic oxidation has a minor effect on
mitigating seafloor methane emissions from gas hydrate dissociation,
Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 3, 163,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00490-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00490-x</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Sulpis et al.(2018)Sulpis, Boudreau, Mucci, Jenkins, Trossman, Arbic,
and Key</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sulpis, O., Boudreau, B. P., Mucci, A., Jenkins, C., Trossman, D. S., Arbic,
B. K., and Key, R. M.: Current CaCO<sub>3</sub> dissolution at the seafloor caused by
anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub>, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115,
11700–11705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804250115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804250115</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Sulpis et al.(2019)Sulpis, Mucci, Boudreau, Barry, and
Johnson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sulpis, O., Mucci, A., Boudreau, B. P., Barry, M. A., and Johnson, B. D.:
Controlling the diffusive boundary layer thickness above the sediment–water
interface in a thermostated rotating-disk reactor, Limnology and
Oceanography: Methods, 17, 241–253, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Sulpis et al.(2021)Sulpis, Jeansson, Dinauer, Lauvset, and
Middelburg</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sulpis, O., Jeansson, E., Dinauer, A., Lauvset, S. K., and Middelburg, J. J.:
Calcium carbonate dissolution patterns in the ocean, Nature Geoscience, 14,
423–428, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00743-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00743-y</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Sulpis et al.(2022)Sulpis, Humphreys, Wilhelmus, Carroll, Berelson,
Menemenlis, Middelburg, and Adkins</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sulpis, O., Humphreys, M. P., Wilhelmus, M. M., Carroll, D., Berelson, W. M., Menemenlis, D., Middelburg, J. J., and Adkins, J. F.: RADIv1: a non-steady-state early diagenetic model for ocean sediments in Julia and MATLAB/GNU Octave, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2105–2131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2105-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2105-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Sulpis et al.(2023)Sulpis, Trossman, Holzer, Jeansson, Lauvset, and
Middelburg</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sulpis, O., Trossman, D. S., Holzer, M., Jeansson, E., Lauvset, S. K., and
Middelburg, J. J.: Respiration patterns in the dark ocean, Global
Biogeochemical Cycles, 37, e2023GB007747, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007747</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Swart et al.(2019)Swart, Cole, Kharin, Lazare, Scinocca, Gillett,
Anstey, Arora, Christian, Hanna, Jiao, Lee, Majaess, Saenko, Seiler, Seinen,
Shao, Sigmond, Solheim, Von Salzen, Yang, and Winter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Swart, N. C., Cole, J. N. S., Kharin, V. V., Lazare, M., Scinocca, J. F., Gillett, N. P., Anstey, J., Arora, V., Christian, J. R., Hanna, S., Jiao, Y., Lee, W. G., Majaess, F., Saenko, O. A., Seiler, C., Seinen, C., Shao, A., Sigmond, M., Solheim, L., von Salzen, K., Yang, D., and Winter, B.: The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4823–4873, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Séférian et al.(2020)Séférian, Berthet, Yool, Palmiéri, Bopp,
Tagliabue, Kwiatkowski, Aumont, Christian, Dunne, Gehlen, Ilyina, John, Li,
Long, Luo, Nakano, Romanou, Schwinger, Stock, Santana-Falcón, Takano,
Tjiputra, Tsujino, Watanabe, Wu, Wu, and Yamamoto</label><mixed-citation>
      
Séférian, R., Berthet, S., Yool, A., Palmiéri, J., Bopp, L., Tagliabue, A.,
Kwiatkowski, L., Aumont, O., Christian, J., Dunne, J., Gehlen, M., Ilyina,
T., John, J. G., Li, H., Long, M. C., Luo, J. Y., Nakano, H., Romanou, A.,
Schwinger, J., Stock, C., Santana-Falcón, Y., Takano, Y., Tjiputra, J.,
Tsujino, H., Watanabe, M., Wu, T., Wu, F., and Yamamoto, A.: Tracking
improvement in simulated marine biogeochemistry between CMIP5 and CMIP6,
Current Climate Change Reports, 6, 95–119, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Tanioka and Matsumoto(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tanioka, T. and Matsumoto, K.: Stability of marine organic matter respiration
stoichiometry, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL085564,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085564" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085564</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Terhaar et al.(2024)Terhaar, Goris, Müller, DeVries, Gruber,
Hauck, Perez, and Séférian</label><mixed-citation>
      
Terhaar, J., Goris, N., Müller, J. D., DeVries, T., Gruber, N., Hauck, J.,
Perez, F. F., and Séférian, R.: Assessment of global ocean
biogeochemistry models for ocean carbon sink estimates in RECCAP2 and
recommendations for future studies, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth
Systems, 16, e2023MS003840, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003840</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Thamdrup and Canfield(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thamdrup, B. and Canfield, D. E.: Pathways of carbon oxidation in continental
margin sediments off central Chile, Limnology and Oceanography, 41,
1629–1650, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1629" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1629</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Therkildsen and Lomstein(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Therkildsen, M. S. and Lomstein, B. A.: Seasonal variation in net benthic
C-mineralization in a shallow estuary, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 12,
131–142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1993.tb00025.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1993.tb00025.x</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Upton et al.(1993)Upton, Nedwell, Parkes, and
Harvey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Upton, A., Nedwell, D., Parkes, R. J., and Harvey, S. M.: Seasonal benthic
microbial activity in the southern North Sea; oxygen uptake and sulphate
reduction, Marine Ecology Progress Series,  273–281,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps101273" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps101273</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Van Cappellen and Wang(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Cappellen, P. and Wang, Y.: Cycling of iron and manganese in surface
sediments; a general theory for the coupled transport and reaction of carbon,
oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, iron, and manganese, American Journal of Science,
296, 197–243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.296.3.197" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.296.3.197</a>, 1996.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Van Dam et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Dam, B., Lehmann, N., Zeller, M. A., Neumann, A., Pröfrock, D., Lipka, M., Thomas, H., and Böttcher, M. E.: Benthic alkalinity
fluxes from coastal sediments of the Baltic and North seas: comparing approaches and identifying knowledge gaps, Biogeosciences, 19, 3775–3789, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3775-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3775-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>van der Zant et al.(2025)van der Zant, Humphreys, and
Sulpis</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Zant, H. F., Humphreys, M. P., and Sulpis, O.: Radi.jl: the
reactive-advective-diffusive-irrigative diagenetic sediment module in Julia
(v2.0.0-rc.1), Zenodo [code and data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18386461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18386461</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Van Raaphorst et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Raaphorst, W., Kloosterhuis, H. T., Cramer, A., and Bakker, K. J.: Nutrient early diagenesis in the sandy sediments of the Dogger Bank area, North Sea: Pore water results, Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 26, 25–52, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90054-K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90054-K</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Voermans et al.(2018)Voermans, Ghisalberti, and
Ivey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Voermans, J. J., Ghisalberti, M., and Ivey, G. N.: A model for mass transport
across the sediment-water interface, Water Resources Research, 54,
2799–2812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022418</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Voynova et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Voynova, Y. G., Petersen, W., Gehrung, M., Aßmann, S., and King, A. L.: Intertidal regions changing coastal alkalinity: The Wadden Sea-North Sea tidally coupled bioreactor, Limnology and Oceanography, 64, 1135–1149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11103</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>Welch(1938)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Welch, B. L.: The significance of the difference between two means when the
population variances are unequal, Biometrika, 29, 350–362,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2332010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/2332010</a>, 1938.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>Westrich and Berner(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Westrich, J. T. and Berner, R. A.: The role of sedimentary organic matter in
bacterial sulfate reduction: The G model tested 1, Limnology and
Oceanography, 29, 236–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0236" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0236</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>Witte and Pfannkuche(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Witte, U. and Pfannkuche, O.: High rates of benthic carbon remineralisation in
the abyssal Arabian Sea, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in
Oceanography, 47, 2785–2804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00049-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00049-7</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>Yool et al.(2013)Yool, Popova, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yool, A., Popova, E. E., and Anderson, T. R.: MEDUSA-2.0: an intermediate complexity biogeochemical model of the marine carbon cycle for climate change and ocean acidification studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1767–1811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>Yuan-Hui and Gregory(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yuan-Hui, L. and Gregory, S.: Diffusion of ions in sea water and in deep-sea
sediments, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 38, 703–714,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(74)90145-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(74)90145-8</a>, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>Zeppilli et al.(2016)Zeppilli, Pusceddu, Trincardi, and
Danovaro</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeppilli, D., Pusceddu, A., Trincardi, F., and Danovaro, R.: Seafloor
heterogeneity influences the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning
relationships in the deep sea, Scientific reports, 6, 26352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26352" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26352</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
