<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Model description paper}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-15-5787-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0): a user-friendly, cloud-based facility for inferring high-resolution methane<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> emissions from TROPOMI satellite observations</article-title><alt-title>Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0)</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0)}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D.~J.~Varon~et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Varon</surname><given-names>Daniel J.</given-names></name>
          <email>danielvaron@g.harvard.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3207-5731</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jacob</surname><given-names>Daniel J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sulprizio</surname><given-names>Melissa</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Estrada</surname><given-names>Lucas A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Downs</surname><given-names>William B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hancock</surname><given-names>Sarah E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nesser</surname><given-names>Hannah</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6778-037X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qu</surname><given-names>Zhen</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3766-9838</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Penn</surname><given-names>Elise</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Zichong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Xiao</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5989-0912</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Lorente</surname><given-names>Alba</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2287-4687</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Tewari</surname><given-names>Ashutosh</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Randles</surname><given-names>Cynthia A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA​​​​​​​</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Leiden, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company, Annandale, New Jersey, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Daniel J. Varon (danielvaron@g.harvard.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>5787</fpage><lpage>5805</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Daniel J. Varon et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e240">We present a user-friendly, cloud-based facility for quantifying methane emissions with 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) resolution by inverse analysis of satellite observations from the TROPOspheric Monitoring
Instrument (TROPOMI). The facility is built on an Integrated Methane Inversion optimal estimation workflow (IMI 1.0) and supported for use on the
Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud. It exploits the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model and TROPOMI data already resident on AWS, thus avoiding
cumbersome big-data download. Users select a region and period of interest, and the IMI returns an analytical solution for the Bayesian optimal
estimate of period-average emissions on the 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid including error statistics, information content, and
visualization code for inspection of results. The inversion uses an advanced research-grade algorithm fully documented in the literature. An
out-of-the-box inversion with rectilinear grid and default prior emission estimates can be conducted with no significant learning curve. Users can
also configure their inversions to infer emissions for irregular regions of interest, swap in their own prior emission inventories, and modify
inversion parameters. Inversion ensembles can be generated at minimal additional cost once the Jacobian matrix for the analytical inversion has been
constructed. A preview feature allows users to determine the TROPOMI information content for their region and time period of interest before
actually performing the inversion. The IMI is heavily documented and is intended to be accessible by researchers and stakeholders with no expertise
in inverse modelling or high-performance computing. We demonstrate the IMI's capabilities by applying it to estimate methane emissions from the US
oil-producing Permian Basin in May 2018.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  <notes notes-type="copyrightstatement">
  
      <p id="d1e331">Cynthia A. Randles's and Ashutosh Tewari's copyrights for this publication are transferred to ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company.​​​​​​​</p>
</notes></front>
<body>
      


<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e342">Controlling methane emissions is a major focus of climate policy (EC and USA, 2021). Anthropogenic methane emissions are primarily from livestock, oil
and gas operations, coal mining, waste management, and rice cultivation (Saunois et al., 2020). Emission inventories use “bottom-up” methods to
estimate emissions from activity levels and emission factors in these different sectors, but the emission factors are often highly uncertain (IPCC,
2019). “Top-down” inverse methods using satellite observations of atmospheric methane in combination with an atmospheric transport model and
statistical optimization can evaluate the bottom-up inventories and monitor emissions worldwide, but they are difficult to use and have their own
errors (Jacob et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e345">Here we present an open-access, cloud-based facility for researchers and stakeholders to estimate methane emissions for user-selected regions of
interest by performing high-resolution analytical inversions of TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) satellite data archived on the cloud and including quality control and error
characterization as part of the inversion results. This facility enables users to infer methane emissions from TROPOMI data without requiring expert
knowledge of inverse methods or cumbersome data download. It exemplifies the emerging concept of “bringing compute to data” that is viewed as
crucial for effective utilization of very large Earth science datasets (Yang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e348">Satellite instruments observe atmospheric methane column concentrations by solar backscatter in the shortwave infrared (SWIR). Earlier instruments
(SCIAMACHY, GOSAT) demonstrated effectiveness for inferring methane emissions on large regional scales (Bergamaschi et al., 2013; Wecht et al., 2014;
Turner et al., 2015; Miller et al., 2019) but were limited by coarse pixel resolution (SCIAMACHY, 2003–2012) or sparse sampling (GOSAT,
2009–present). TROPOMI, launched in October 2017 aboard the European Space Agency's Sentinel-5P satellite,
offers unprecedented capability for monitoring emissions on regional scales, with daily global observations at 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
nadir pixel resolution over land (Hu et al., 2018; Schneising et al., 2019; Lorente et al., 2021). The retrieval success rate averages only 3 %
because of clouds and dark and heterogeneous surfaces (Hasekamp et al., 2019), but the data density is still at least 2 orders of magnitude higher than
for GOSAT (Qu et al., 2021). TROPOMI data have been used in regional inversions at up to 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution (Zhang et al., 2020; Shen et al.,
2021, 2022; Z. Chen et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e382">Inverse analysis of TROPOMI data to infer methane emissions requires a chemical transport model (CTM), known as forward model for the inversion, to
relate emissions to the observed methane columns through simulation of atmospheric transport. The problem is generally underconstrained because of
uneven data density and because of errors in the satellite retrievals and in the CTM, referred to collectively as observational error. The solution
must therefore be regularized, typically with prior information in the form of bottom-up emissions on the CTM grid, to produce posterior emission
estimates that improve on the prior. This is generally done by minimization of a Bayesian cost function, using either variational methods or an
analytical solution (Brasseur and Jacob, 2017). Variational methods can infer methane emissions on any grid, for any nonlinear problem, and for any
error probability density function (pdf), but they do not immediately provide error characterization of the posterior estimate. An analytical solution
takes advantage of the linearity of the relationship between methane emissions and concentrations (Chen and Prinn, 2006; Maasakkers et al., 2021). It
requires explicit construction of the Jacobian matrix expressing the sensitivity of concentrations to emissions, but this is readily done on
supercomputing clusters as an embarrassingly parallel problem (Maasakkers et al., 2019). Two major advantages of the analytical solution are that
(1) it provides closed-form characterizations of the posterior error pdf and the information content of the observations, and (2) it allows easy
generation of solution ensembles exploring the inversion parameter space (Lu et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e386">Inverse analysis of satellite observations requires complex modelling tools, advanced data processing, and access to high-end computational
resources. These are major barriers for novice and occasional users and for stakeholders lacking technical expertise. Our user-friendly, cloud-based
facility for inferring high-resolution methane emissions from TROPOMI satellite data lifts those barriers. The facility is based on an Integrated
Methane Inversion workflow (IMI 1.0) that builds on current best practices for analytical inversion of TROPOMI data (Shen et al., 2021). It draws on
the GEOS-Chem CTM already accessible on the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud (Zhuang et al., 2019, 2020), directly accesses the operational TROPOMI
data maintained on the cloud by Meteorological Environmental Earth Observation S.r.l. (MEEO), and infers methane emissions at
0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) resolution for user-selected regions. It is designed to
be easily configurable for users wishing to quantify emissions for specific regions and periods. The workflow can be run “out of the box” or
modified with user-supplied information, and it can be downloaded for users who wish to work on their own computational clusters. Our objective in
this paper is to provide a high-level description of the facility and exemplify its practical use. Detailed technical documentation for user support
is available online (<uri>https://imi.seas.harvard.edu</uri>, last access: 8 June 2022).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI)</title>
      <p id="d1e456">The IMI infers methane emissions for a user-selected region and period by inverse analysis of TROPOMI methane observations with GEOS-Chem as forward
model. The forward model <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relates the period-average methane emissions (gridded state vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the observed methane columns (observation vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) such that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the observational error <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> includes errors in both the satellite data and
the forward model. The inversion optimizes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to match the observations, subject to constraints from the prior emission estimates
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which have their
own error <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The optimization is done by analytical minimization of a least-squares Bayesian cost function, yielding a
posterior estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for the state vector with accompanying error statistics. Here we describe the different components of the IMI and use a
1-month inversion for the US Permian Basin (Fig. 1) as a guiding example.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e558">Example of an IMI state vector for inferring methane emissions from TROPOMI observations. Here the region of interest is the US Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico (grid with white background), comprising 235 grid elements at 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution generated from a shapefile. The inversion domain also includes the areas in color bordering the region of interest, representing eight buffer elements added to the state vector to correct errors in boundary conditions (see Sect. 2.3).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>TROPOMI satellite observations</title>
      <p id="d1e602">TROPOMI retrieves atmospheric methane columns from backscattered sunlight in the 2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> methane absorption band, with daily global
coverage at 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nadir pixel resolution (7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prior to August 2019). Measurements
are made at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13:30 local solar time. The methane retrieval is produced by the Netherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON). It is based on
the RemoTeC full-physics algorithm (Butz et al., 2009, 2010, 2011) and retrieves methane data as column-average dry-air mixing ratios
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) along with surface reflectivity and scattering properties of the atmosphere (Butz et al., 2012; Hu et al., 2016). The
TROPOMI data are posted operationally on the AWS cloud and updated daily by MEEO with a latency of a few days
(<uri>https://registry.opendata.aws/sentinel5p</uri>, last access: 8 June 2022). The methane product provides information on numerous
retrieval parameters together with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, including the center and boundaries of the pixel, the surface pressure, the 12-layer pressure
grid of the retrieval, the vertical averaging kernel vector and prior vertical profile of methane dry-air mixing ratio, a quality assurance value, and
the retrieved surface albedo in the near-infrared (NIR) and SWIR spectral ranges.</p>
      <p id="d1e711">The operational TROPOMI record begins in May 2018. The methane retrieval is presently Version 1 (Hasekamp et al., 2019) until July 2021 and Version 2
(Lorente et al., 2021) afterward. Validation of Version 1.3.0 showed a global mean bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to ground-based measurements
from 19 sites in the Total Column Carbon Observing Network (TCCON; Wunch et al., 2011a; Qu et al., 2021), but global bias is of no consequence for
regional inversions because it is effectively corrected through the boundary conditions. Of more concern are spatially variable biases (regional
biases), caused mainly by aliasing of surface albedo errors into the methane retrieval (Lorente et al., 2021) but also by scattering-induced surface
reflectance errors (Barré et al., 2021) and errors in surface altitude (Hachmeister et al., 2022). Qu et al. (2021) quantified a nominal TROPOMI
regional bias of 6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Version 1.3.0 as the standard deviation of station-to-station biases between TROPOMI and the 19 TCCON sites, and a
similar analysis for Version 2.2.0 shows a regional bias of 5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lorente et al., 2021). This is sufficiently small to enable successful
regional inversions, for which Buchwitz et al. (2015) estimated a regional bias threshold of
10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the IMI we only use recommended high-quality retrievals over land, with quality assurance value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 (Hu et al., 2016). We
further remove observations with low SWIR albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05; de Gouw et al., 2020) and high “blended albedo” (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.85), a linear combination of
NIR and SWIR albedo, to avoid biases from dark and snow-covered scenes (Wunch et al., 2011b; Lorente et al., 2021). The quantity of data removed by
these additional filters depends on the region and period for the inversion; we find for example that they remove roughly 25 % (summer) to
40 % (winter) of otherwise high-quality observations across North America in 2019.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>GEOS-Chem chemical transport model as forward model for the inversion</title>
      <p id="d1e783">GEOS-Chem is a three-dimensional CTM that simulates methane concentrations on the basis of prescribed emissions either globally or for user-selected
nested domains (Wecht et al., 2014). It is driven by Goddard Earth Observation System (GEOS) meteorological data from the NASA Global Modelling and
Assimilation Office (GMAO). The IMI uses as default the GEOS Fast Processing (GEOS-FP) meteorological data product at 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution, with an option to use the GEOS Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2) at
0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.625<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution. The GEOS data have 72 vertical levels from the surface to the mesopause, and these are condensed to
47 levels in our GEOS-Chem simulations by merging levels in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e837">We use the nested capability of GEOS-Chem to simulate methane concentrations over the inversion domain, with dynamic boundary conditions outside the
inversion domain updated every 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from a global archive of TROPOMI data smoothed spatially over a rolling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> window and
temporally over a 1-month period centered on each grid square and day and distributed vertically following a GEOS-Chem simulation at
4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution (Shen et al., 2021). This smoothed TROPOMI 3-D archive is provided as part of the IMI. Using smoothed
TROPOMI data as boundary conditions minimizes bias from boundary conditions advected over the user-selected region. Smoothing of the TROPOMI data
is necessary because of the sparsity of successful retrievals and the noise therein. To further reduce the bias associated with boundary conditions,
we expand the inversion domain beyond the user-selected region of interest to include a buffer area, and coarse buffer elements are added to the state
vector of methane emissions to be optimized (Fig. 1, Sect. 2.3).</p>
      <p id="d1e890">The user-specified period of interest defines the time window for the GEOS-Chem simulation. Starting from the smoothed TROPOMI fields as initial
conditions, we apply a 1-month spin-up with prior emission estimates to properly initialize the model concentration fields within the inversion
domain; 1 month is sufficient to fully ventilate any practical regional domain. This spin-up only needs to be done once.</p>
      <p id="d1e893">The GEOS-Chem simulation includes chemical methane sinks from archived (offline) tropospheric concentrations of oxidants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
stratospheric loss frequencies (Maasakkers et al., 2019), as well as soil uptake (Murguia-Flores et al., 2018), but these are inconsequential for
nested-domain simulations and are not optimized by the IMI. Ventilation of the inversion domain takes place on much shorter timescales than the
methane atmospheric lifetime, and the sinks are relatively spatially smooth, so no information on methane sinks is to be gained from a regional
inversion. The effect of methane sinks is implicitly included in the specification of boundary conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Methane emission state vector to be optimized</title>
      <p id="d1e920">The state vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ensemble of variables (“state variables”) to be optimized in the inversion. In the IMI, these are the gridded
methane emissions (temporal mean) at 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution for the region and period of interest, plus buffer elements
at coarser resolution bordering the region of interest and filling out the inversion domain (eight elements by default). Users specify a region and time
period of interest in the IMI configuration file. The region of interest can have any irregular shape, as illustrated in Fig. 1. In that example case,
the region of interest is an assemblage of 235 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells covering the geological extent of the Permian
Basin, and the eight buffer elements expand to a rectangular inversion domain 24–39<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 95–111<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. The state vector in this example
has length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1019">The simplest (default) option for the user is to select a rectangular region of interest as latitude and longitude bounds. The IMI then infers
emissions for the 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells within that region, excluding any grid cells less than 25 % over land
(adjustable default), and selects eight additional buffer elements with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means algorithm to pad out the rectangular inversion domain. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means
algorithm sorts grid cells by latitude–longitude coordinates, and the number of buffer elements can be adjusted in the configuration file. Users also
have the option to select an irregular region of interest, as in the Permian example of Fig. 1, by providing a previously defined state vector file or
a shapefile for the region boundaries. Offshore emissions can be included in the state vector by lowering the default 25 % land cover requirement
or by directly modifying the state vector file. TROPOMI does not observe over water except in the glint mode, but information on offshore emissions
can still be gained from the plumes transported over nearby land (Shen et al., 2021).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1064">Bottom-up methane emission inventories used as default prior estimates in IMI 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="50mm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Anthropogenic<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">United States</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EPA GHGI (Maasakkers et al., 2016)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mexico</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">INECC (Scarpelli et al., 2020a)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Canada</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECCC NIR (Scarpelli et al., 2022a)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rest of world</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">     – Fuel exploitation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GFEI v2.0 (Scarpelli et al., 2022b)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">     – Other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EDGAR v6 (Janssens-Maenhout et al., 2019)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Natural</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wetlands</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WetCHARTS v1.2.1 (Bloom et al., 2017)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Geological seeps</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Etiope et al. (2019)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Open fires</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GFED4 (Randerson et al., 2018)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Termites</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fung et al. (1991)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1076"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The inventories are archived on AWS on their native grids and over their temporal records and are re-gridded and summed for use as IMI prior estimates through the Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) emissions processor in GEOS-Chem (Lin et al., 2021). The inventories listed here are those available as of January 2022. They will be updated in the future as improved or more recent emission inventory data become available. Users can also substitute their own inventories. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> All anthropogenic emissions are on a 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid and resolved by emission sector. They do not vary with time of year except for manure (Maasakkers et al., 2016) and rice (Zhang et al., 2021). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Gridded version of the US EPA Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks (GHGI; EPA, 2016) for 2012. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Gridded version of the Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (INECC) national inventory (INECC and SEMARNAT, 2018) for 2015. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Gridded version of the Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) National Inventory Report (NIR; ECCC, 2020) for 2018. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Global Fuel Emission Inventory (GFEI v2) constructed by gridding the national sectoral emission inventories reported by individual countries to the UNFCCC for 2018 and 2019. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Data for 2018. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Emissions for individual years and months specified on a 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid from the mean of the WetCHARTs ensemble. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Scaled to a global total emission of 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hmiel et al., 2020). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Daily emissions specified on a 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid from the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED4). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Emissions specified on a 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Prior emission estimates</title>
      <p id="d1e1506">The prior emission estimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>​​​​​​​ should represent the best knowledge of methane emissions prior to performing the inversion. They
need to be available in gridded format to match the resolution of the inversion. Table 1 compiles the bottom-up emission inventories used as default
prior estimates in the IMI. The North American anthropogenic emissions are gridded versions of the national sector-resolved inventories reported by
the individual countries to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) as given by Maasakkers et al. (2016) for the United
States, Scarpelli et al. (2020a) for Mexico, and Scarpelli et al. (2022a) for Canada. The emissions from fuel exploitation (oil, gas, coal) in the
rest of the world similarly grid the national emissions reported annually to the UNFCCC (Scarpelli et al., 2022b). The Emission Database for Global
Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) v6 is otherwise used as the global default. Natural emissions include contributions from wetlands with monthly resolution
(Bloom et al., 2017), open fires with daily resolution (Randerson et al., 2018), and small sources
from geological seeps and termites. These default inventories can be superseded by users with their own prior estimates, and we give an example of
this in Sect. 4.</p>
      <p id="d1e1520">The inversion infers emissions on the 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid, and this may include contributions from different sectors. Users
can attribute the corrections to individual sectors based on the sectoral distribution of the emissions in the prior inventories and estimates of
prior errors for each sector (Shen et al., 2021; Cusworth et al., 2021a). This needs to be done in
post-processing of the inversion results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>TROPOMI operator</title>
      <p id="d1e1556">The forward model <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the inversion involves successive application of a GEOS-Chem operator <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that relates the
emission state vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the resulting 3-D simulated dry-air mixing ratio field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a TROPOMI operator <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that relates the
vertical profile of simulated dry-air mixing ratios to the corresponding column-average dry-air mixing ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that would be
observed by TROPOMI. The TROPOMI retrieval provides information on the operator <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the local vertical
profile vector of dry-air mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (with prior estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for 12 sub-column pressure layers extending from the local surface
to the top of the atmosphere, with vertical sensitivity described by a column-averaging kernel vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for those 12 layers:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M132" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">η</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes a 12-dimensional unit vector.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1747">Simulation of TROPOMI column-average dry-air mixing ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observations in the GEOS-Chem 3-D model atmosphere. <bold>(a)</bold> The operator first identifies which GEOS-Chem grid cells overlap with the TROPOMI observation pixel. <bold>(b)</bold> The operator remaps conservatively the GEOS-Chem vertical profile of methane dry sub-column mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the GEOS-Chem pressure grid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the TROPOMI pressure grid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to produce a vertical profile of methane sub-column mixing ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the TROPOMI pressure grid. <bold>(c)</bold> The TROPOMI averaging kernel vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 1) is applied to the remapped GEOS-Chem profile on the TROPOMI pressure grid to produce a virtual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observation of the GEOS-Chem atmosphere. If multiple GEOS-Chem grid cells overlap with the TROPOMI observation, the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are area-weighted to the TROPOMI pixel.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1862">Figure 2 summarizes the operations involved in simulating TROPOMI observations of the GEOS-Chem atmosphere. The first step is to geo-locate the
TROPOMI pixel (nadir resolution 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but coarser off-nadir) on the GEOS-Chem
0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid, including the region of interest and the surrounding buffer elements. If the pixel overlaps two or more
GEOS-Chem grid cells then the calculation is done for each grid cell column followed by area-weighted averaging. We remap the sub-column mixing ratios
from the GEOS-Chem vertical grid (47 layers) to the TROPOMI vertical grid (12 layers) with total or partial allocation of GEOS-Chem layers to TROPOMI
layers on the basis of pressure edges (Fig. 2). We then apply the TROPOMI column-averaging kernel vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) to obtain the
column-average dry-air mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as would be observed by TROPOMI in the GEOS-Chem atmosphere. When remapping GEOS-Chem to the
TROPOMI vertical grid, we address differences in surface pressure between GEOS-Chem and TROPOMI by adjusting the lowest GEOS-Chem pressure edge to
match that of TROPOMI, as illustrated in Fig. 2; this applies the lowest-level sub-column mixing ratio in GEOS-Chem down to the lowest TROPOMI
pressure edge.</p>
      <p id="d1e1939">The column-averaging kernel sensitivities in TROPOMI are generally within 2 % of unity in the troposphere and drop off slowly in the
stratosphere (Hu et al., 2016). Thus the pressure remapping has relatively little effect except in regions with strong topography, where
high-elevation pixels have greater stratospheric contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Stanevich et al. (2020) reported that stratospheric methane in
GEOS-Chem exhibits a high bias relative to ACE-FTS satellite observations, but Zhang et al. (2021) found that this bias is largely restricted to polar
vortex conditions where TROPOMI does not have observations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Optimization procedure</title>
      <p id="d1e1965">Our Bayesian inversion to infer methane emissions fits the GEOS-Chem simulation to the TROPOMI observations, weighing prior and observational
uncertainties and assuming normal error pdf's. This involves minimization of the scalar cost function (Brasseur and Jacob, 2017)
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M151" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Jacobian matrix, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the prior error covariance matrix,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the observational error covariance matrix including contributions from instrument and forward model errors, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
an additional regularization parameter. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the sensitivity of observations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the state vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as described by
the forward model <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is computed column by column from an ensemble of perturbation simulations in the forward model, each perturbing
a single element of the state vector from the reference simulation. Because the model is strictly linear, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> defines GEOS-Chem for the
purpose of the inversion.</p>
      <p id="d1e2170">The default <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is constructed in the IMI by assuming 50 % error standard deviation on emissions, with no error correlations
(diagonal matrix). The default <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assumes a uniform observational error standard deviation of 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on previous
estimates of 13–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for TROPOMI by the residual error method (Qu et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2021), again with no error correlation. These
default values are adjustable by the user through the configuration file. The assumption of uncorrelated prior errors may lead to underestimation of
the aggregated error in total regional emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2211">The regularization parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to prevent overfitting and underfitting that would result from inexact specifications
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and because the observations are not perfectly independent and identically distributed (IID
condition). The best value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be selected on the basis of the L curve (Hansen, 1999) or the expected Chi-square distribution of the cost function's prior terms (Lu et al., 2021). These two methods yield consistent results (Qu
et al., 2021). Shen et al. (2021) used the L curve to select <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a regional inversion of TROPOMI observations over eastern Mexico at
0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution. We adopt that value in the IMI as default, but it can be adjusted in configuration.</p>
      <p id="d1e2288">The posterior state vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> minimizing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained by an analytical solution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M176" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with posterior error covariance matrix (characterizing uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M178" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> provides full closed-form characterization of the error in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> assuming that the inverse problem has been well posed through the
formulation of the cost function. Errors in the formulation of the cost function can be evaluated through an inversion ensemble varying inversion
parameters (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), prior emission estimates, and satellite observation sampling. The averaging kernel matrix
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M182" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          describes the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> to the truth (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The trace of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, referred to as
the degrees of freedom for signal (DOFS; Rodgers, 2000), measures the information content of the observations towards optimizing the state vector. It
represents the number of independent pieces of information on the state vector that the observations can quantify. The diagonal entries
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are referred to as averaging kernel sensitivities, and they give an estimate of how much the posterior solution for a given state
vector element is informed by the observations as opposed to the prior estimates (Cui et al., 2014; Brasseur and Jacob, 2017). An emission element
with averaging kernel sensitivity 0 is not quantified by the observations at all, and the inversion results for that grid cell return the prior
value. An emission element with averaging kernel sensitivity 1 is fully quantified by the observations, and the inversion results for that grid cell
are independent of the prior estimate. We use sparse matrix algebra for the matrix operations in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>)–(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) so that the computational
cost of the optimization procedure is small relative to the cost of constructing the Jacobian. Sample performance statistics are given in Sect. 3.7.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>IMI preview: assessing information content before performing an inversion</title>
      <p id="d1e2615">The IMI includes a preview feature designed to help users avoid spending resources on inversions with insufficient information content. Lack of
information could come from low TROPOMI data density (e.g., from cloud cover) and/or from seriously biased prior emission estimates for the
region and period of interest. The preview can be run after configuring the IMI and before initiating the inversion, and it performs several tasks. First,
it maps the TROPOMI data and prior emission estimates for the selected region and period of interest, so the user can assess spatial correspondence
between the two datasets. Second, it maps observation density and counts the total number of observations available for the selected region and
period. Third, it maps the SWIR albedo retrieved by TROPOMI to help users identify potential artifacts if the SWIR albedo and methane retrievals show
similar features (Barré et al., 2021). Fourth, it estimates the USD financial cost of performing the inversion by scaling the cost of our
illustrative Permian Basin inversion (Sect. 4.3) according to the number of state variables, grid resolution, and inversion period length. Finally, it
makes a rough estimate of the expected DOFS for the user's inversion using the procedure outlined below. A detailed example of the IMI preview feature
is presented in Sect. 4.2.</p>
      <p id="d1e2618">The rough estimate of the expected DOFS is done as follows. Ignoring error correlations, assuming uniform observational errors, and further assuming
uniform transport, the calculation of the averaging kernel matrix reduces to a scalar problem (Brasseur and Jacob, 2017). The averaging kernel
sensitivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for a given emission element in the state vector is computed as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M188" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the prior error standard deviation of the emission element, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
the observational error standard deviation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of satellite observations relevant to that emission element, and the transport model is
defined by the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a summary representation of the Jacobian. With default 50 %
prior error standard deviation, we have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the total prior emission
for the region of interest, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of emission elements in that region of interest, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the grid cell side length
(25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the GEOS-FP default). For our guiding Permian Basin example using the default IMI emission inventories,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which yields <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
mean number of observations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per emission element is the total number of observations for the region and period of interest, divided by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; for
the May 2018 Permian example we obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 19 978 observations (see Sect. 4.2). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is by default
15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3061">To estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> we use the approximation proposed by Nesser et al. (2021) for simple mass balance ventilation of local emissions in the grid cell by a
constant wind:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M220" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molar mass of dry air, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molar mass of methane, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is gravitational acceleration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a
uniform wind speed ventilating the emission element (assumed 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface pressure (assumed 1010 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> serves as a simple representation of turbulent diffusion, and here we take <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> following Nesser et al. (2021) so that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. After computing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in this way, the expected information content for the inversion can be obtained as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M234" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOFS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3312">Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>) gives a quick estimate of the information content to be expected from the inversion without actually performing the
inversion. Although very rough, it is based on the same principles as the actual inversion, and we find that it gives a good approximation of the
actual DOFS as demonstrated in Sect. 4.2. It further has the advantage of being transparent in that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined by the user choice of
region and period of interest, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are set by default in the IMI but are configurable by the user, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has
direct physical meaning. In fact, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be used for a very rough estimate of emissions corresponding to a local column enhancement (Jacob et al.,
2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3371">Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI) preview and workflow on the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud to infer methane emissions from TROPOMI data. The IMI is accessed as a custom Amazon Machine Image (AMI) on the AWS EC2 computing service. It accesses the operational TROPOMI methane data, GEOS meteorological data, default bottom-up emission inventories, and IMI boundary conditions (smoothed TROPOMI data) from AWS S3 data storage buckets for the desired period. All of these data are resident on the cloud. Users specify their region or period of interest through a configuration file that also allows modification of IMI defaults. They can provide alternative bottom-up emission inventories (instead of the GEOS-Chem defaults) to serve as prior estimates for the inversion. The IMI preview provides visualization of the TROPOMI data and prior emission inventories and a rough estimate of the information content of the inversion (degrees of freedom for signal, or DOFS). Based on this information the user can decide to carry out the inversion through the IMI workflow (Fig. 4) or modify the configuration (see Sects. 2.7 and 4.2 for details).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3380">The user may decide on the basis of the DOFS estimated from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>) whether or not to carry out the inversion. DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 would be a
minimum requirement to achieve any solid information on emissions in the region of interest, and more may be desirable if multiple pieces of
information are desired on the emission fields within the region. Shen et al. (2022) required DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 to reliably estimate basin-wide emissions
from oil and gas basins in North America. If the user deems the DOFS to be insufficient, a cure is to increase the number of observations by lengthening
the observation period. The user may also revisit the information on the prior emission estimate and whether a larger value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may
be appropriate, which will increase the DOFS.</p>
      <p id="d1e3410">Beyond inspection of the DOFS, the user should inspect the preview plots to guard against large artifacts in the observations or large bias in the
spatial distribution of prior estimates. Artifacts in the observations can be diagnosed by similarity of patterns between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SWIR
albedo, implying that spectral dependence of the albedo is propagating into the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval. If so the observations should not be
used. Large bias in the spatial distribution of prior estimates can be diagnosed by comparison to the TROPOMI observations and would be problematic
in the inversion by misallocating the corrections (Yu et al., 2021); this can be addressed by
increasing the error in the prior estimate (including very large values to mimic a non-informative uniform prior) or switching to a different prior
emission inventory, as is illustrated in Sect. 4 in the context of the Permian example.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Implementation of the IMI on the cloud</title>
      <p id="d1e3452">Figure 3 outlines the architecture of the IMI on the AWS cloud including the preview and the inversion workflow. The IMI draws on two AWS facilities:
the Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) for computation and the Simple Storage Service (S3) for data storage. The computing environment for the workflow is
contained in an Amazon Machine Image (AMI) accessible from the EC2 service. The TROPOMI operational data are archived independently in their own
S3 bucket by MEEO. Meteorological data from the NASA GEOS-FP product are archived in another
S3 bucket by the GEOS-Chem support team to support the general use of GEOS-Chem on the cloud (Zhuang et al., 2019). That bucket also contains the
bottom-up methane emission inventories that serve as default prior estimates for the inversions (Table 1). Smoothed TROPOMI data serving as boundary
conditions for the inversions are continuously updated by us to stay current with the TROPOMI operational data and have their own S3 bucket. All of
these datasets are accessed by the preview and the workflow as needed, by automated transfer from S3 to the Elastic Block Store (EBS) volume on the
user's EC2 instance.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3457">Flowchart for the Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0) on the AWS cloud. Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the emission state vector of length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vector of TROPOMI observations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time-evolving 3-D GEOS-Chem methane concentration field over the inversion period, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the GEOS-Chem operator, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the TROPOMI operator, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Jacobian matrix, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the posterior error covariance matrix, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the averaging kernel matrix. See Sect. 2 for equations and further description of the algorithm. The workflow has the option of skipping the calculation of the Jacobian matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> if it has already been computed; this allows generation of a solution ensemble by varying inversion parameters (see text for details).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3543">Default IMI version 1.0 settings and configuration options.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Setting</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Default</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Configuration options</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">State vector</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rectangular region<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Irregular region<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spatial resolution and meteorological data</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (GEOS-FP)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.625<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (MERRA-2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Observational error standard deviation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Any uniform value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Prior error standard deviation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Any uniform value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Regularization parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Any value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Buffer zone width<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Any value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of buffer elements in state vector</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Any number<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spin-up time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 month</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Any length</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Minimum land cover fraction<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Any value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [0, 1]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3546"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Defined automatically from user-selected latitude and longitude bounds for the region of interest. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Either specified with a shapefile or defined by a pre-generated custom state vector file. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  Extension of the inversion domain beyond the region of interest to absorb errors in boundary conditions. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Buffer elements are specified with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means algorithm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Minimum land cover fraction for inclusion of a GEOS-Chem emission element in the state vector (see Sect. 2.3). Land cover information is from GEOS-FP or MERRA-2.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3857">Workflow users begin by opening an EC2 instance and selecting the workflow AMI. The AMI contains the GEOS-Chem and IMI source codes, a configuration
file, and all required software dependencies. They then specify a region and time period of interest in the configuration file. The configuration file
also contains options to modify the IMI default settings (Table 2). Detailed instructions for configuring the IMI are provided in the online technical
documentation (<uri>https://imi.seas.harvard.edu</uri>, last access: 8 June 2022). Users can use as prior estimates the default
bottom-up emission inventories provided with the workflow (Table 1), or they can substitute their own. They can run the IMI preview (Fig. 3) to collect
and visualize the TROPOMI and prior emission data for their selected region and time period and to get a rough estimate of information content and
cost (Sect. 2.7). The preview incurs no significant computational cost. If the information content is deemed sufficient, the user can go on to run the
IMI, including construction of the Jacobian matrix. This is the main computational cost but is very reasonable for typical inversion domains and
periods (see Sect. 4.3 and Table 3). Once the Jacobian matrix has been constructed to define the forward model transport, it can be re-used to
populate an inversion ensemble at no significant added computational cost by varying inversion parameters and/or bottom-up emission inventories (the
latter requires rescaling the matrix). It can also be archived for later use.</p>
      <p id="d1e3863">The current IMI version 1.0 can be applied to any region of interest but has enhanced performance for regions within North America
(10–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 40–140<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), Europe (33–61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), and Asia (11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
60–150<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), where pre-cut continental subsets of the GEOS meteorological data (GEOS-FP and MERRA-2) are available to reduce computational
cost. These subsets correspond to the default windows used in GEOS-Chem nested simulations (Kim et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015). The meteorological
data for these three windows are uploaded to AWS by the GEOS-Chem support team with a latency of a few weeks. Users may apply the IMI to other regions
using the full global GEOS meteorological data or after cropping the global data to a suitable nesting domain, following instructions and tools
available on the IMI website (<uri>https://imi.seas.harvard.edu</uri>, last access: 11 July 2022). Future IMI versions will expand the
pre-cut windows to other continents.</p>
      <p id="d1e3942">Figure 4 charts the IMI computational workflow as described in Sect. 2 and contained in the AMI. The workflow receives instructions from the
configuration file and then has three basic steps: (i) perform an ensemble of GEOS-Chem simulations to define the transport features for individual
emission state vector elements, (ii) use those simulations to construct the Jacobian matrix, and (iii) solve the analytical inversion using
Eqs. (3)–(5). When the user configures and runs the IMI, these steps are executed automatically to generate posterior methane emission estimates for
the inversion domain along with error statistics. The user can then inspect the inversion results using a visualization notebook provided with the
IMI. The notebook contains sample code to plot the state vector, prior emissions, posterior emissions, scale factors (posterior and prior ratios),
averaging kernel sensitivities, and TROPOMI data for the inversion domain and period.</p>
      <p id="d1e3945">The IMI workflow begins by constructing the emission state vector (length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the user specifications. After an initial spin-up simulation to
generate initial conditions for the period of interest, it then performs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GEOS-Chem simulations. These include a reference simulation driven by
the prior bottom-up emission inventories and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbation simulations perturbing one emission element at a time. All of these simulations access
S3 data for prior emissions, meteorology, and boundary conditions (Fig. 3). The perturbation simulations determine the sensitivities of the satellite
observations to the state variables and are used to construct the Jacobian matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as described in Sect. 2.6. For our 1-month Permian
Basin example (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a total of 244 simulations are performed in this way. The reference and perturbation simulations are embarrassingly
parallel and can be performed simultaneously once the spin-up simulation is complete if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CPUs are available on the user's EC2 instance; with
fewer CPUs the workflow runs the simulations in parallel batches.</p>
      <p id="d1e4006">After computing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the reference and perturbation simulations, the IMI solves Eqs. (3)–(5) for the optimized emission
estimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, posterior errors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, and averaging kernel matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and saves these quantities as output. The elements of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and the diagonal entries of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (averaging kernel sensitivities) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> are then mapped to the grid cells of the inversion
domain and saved as a separate output to facilitate inspection of the results, but archiving of the full matrices allows users to further inspect error
correlations and smoothing. The final step of the workflow is to conduct a GEOS-Chem simulation using the posterior emissions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for comparison
to the TROPOMI observations and to a GEOS-Chem simulation using prior emissions (reference simulation) to verify the quality of the inversion results
in better fitting the TROPOMI observations. This comparison could be performed more quickly by applying a correction
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the prior forward model results, but running the full posterior simulation has the
advantage of allowing validation against independent (e.g., ground-based) observations. Posterior simulation results are provided as part of the IMI
output.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Illustrative application to the Permian Basin</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Setup</title>
      <p id="d1e4121">We perform a 1-month inversion for the Permian Basin (currently the most prolific US oil-producing basin) as an illustrative application of the
IMI. We choose 1–31 May 2018 as the period of interest for the inversion. The region of interest is defined from a shapefile for the Permian Basin and
comprises 235 state vector elements to describe emissions within the region at 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution, plus 8 buffer
elements to pad out the inversion domain, for a total of 243 state vector elements (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e4149">We perform the inversion using the default IMI settings laid out in Tables 1 and 2 but with the custom state vector of Fig. 1. The steps prior to
initiating the inversion are as follows:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4154">Create an AWS instance with the IMI workflow AMI.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4158">Connect to the instance, upload the custom state vector file of Fig. 1, and open the configuration file.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4162">Set the start date to 1 May 2018 and the end date to 1 June 2018.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4166">Turn off the option to automatically generate the state vector from the latitude and longitude bounds of a rectangular region of interest.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4170">Enter the path to the custom state vector file and close the configuration file.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4174">Run the IMI preview to display the TROPOMI data and prior emissions, and estimate the information content to be achieved in the inversion.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4179">Output of the IMI preview (Sect. 2.7) applied to the Permian Basin example with the default EPA gridded GHGI inventory (Maasakkers et al., 2016) as prior estimate of emissions. <bold>(a)</bold> Mean TROPOMI column-average dry-air methane mixing ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) data for the user-selected region (thick black contour) and period of interest (1–31 May 2018), resampled to a 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid and cropped to 28–35.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 98.5–107<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W for visibility. The color bar is saturated to highlight methane hotspots over the Delaware and Midland sub-basins. Inset gives the total number of observations and degrees of freedom for signal (DOFS) for the region of interest. <bold>(b)</bold> Gridded GHGI (default) prior emissions. <bold>(c)</bold> Number of observations per 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell for the period of interest. <bold>(d)</bold> Mean SWIR albedo for the period of interest on the 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid. Here the preview shows poor agreement in the spatial distribution of emissions between the observations and prior emission estimates, suggesting that the prior estimate should be replaced by a better one (as is done in our application) or that the prior error estimate should be increased.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Analysis of results</title>
      <p id="d1e4318">Figure 5 shows the IMI preview results including the mean TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data for the selected region and period, the observation density,
the TROPOMI SWIR albedo, and the default prior emission estimates (here the EPA GHGI). The TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data (Fig. 5a) include
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 978 individual observations for the region of interest, and these are used for the DOFS estimate in the preview. There are more than
100 000 additional observations in the inversion domain outside the region of interest and covering the buffer grid cells (Fig. 1). The two methane
hotspots at the center of Fig. 5a correspond to the Permian's Delaware and Midland sub-basins. TROPOMI provides relatively uniform sampling across the region
of interest (Fig. 5c), and visual comparison of Fig. 5a and d shows no indication of albedo-related regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> biases. However, we see
that the gridded GHGI inventory (Fig. 5b) severely misrepresents the spatial distribution of emissions in the Permian by failing to capture the
sub-basin structure apparent in Fig. 5a. Furthermore, the inversion preview indicates an expected DOFS value of 2.0, which is marginal for quantifying
emissions on that regional scale (Shen et al., 2021b).</p>
      <p id="d1e4380">At this point it would be sensible to reconfigure the IMI before performing the inversion, and we explain how to do so in what follows. If we
proceed and conduct the inversion with these default settings, we find a DOFS of 1.9 (close to the preview). The posterior emission integrated over
the region of interest is 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, much higher than the default GHGI prior emission of 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and with scale factors
(posterior over prior ratios) ranging from 1.0 to 3.3. These results are consistent with independent observations that the GHGI emissions for the Permian
Basin are far too low (Omara et al., 2018; Robertson et al., 2020; Y. Chen et al., 2022; Cusworth et al., 2021b; Irakulis-Loitxate et al., 2021; Lyon
et al., 2021), but the low DOFS and biased spatial distribution in the prior emissions do not inspire confidence in the results.</p>
      <p id="d1e4417">One can increase the DOFS simply by increasing the length of the inversion period, thus accumulating more observations, but the incorrect spatial
distribution of the prior estimate will make it harder for the inversion to converge to the correct solution (Yu et al., 2021). An alternative is to
increase the magnitude of the prior error estimate, but this may result in unphysical solutions if the problem is underconstrained in part of the
domain. The user can judge from the output if these issues are severe.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4423">Results of a 1-month (1–31 May 2018) application of the IMI to the Permian Basin using the EDF emission inventory (Zhang et al., 2020) as prior estimate of emissions. <bold>(a)</bold> Prior emissions. <bold>(b)</bold> Posterior emissions. <bold>(c)</bold> Scale factors applied to the prior emissions to obtain the posterior emissions. <bold>(d)</bold> Averaging kernel sensitivities with associated degrees of freedom for signal (DOFS) inset.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4444">A better alternative is to investigate whether an improved bottom-up inventory would enable a more accurate inversion. In the case of the Permian
Basin, an alternative gridded bottom-up inventory is available from the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) with more accurate accounting of oil and gas
infrastructure and larger total emissions of 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zhang et al., 2020). IMI results using the EDF inventory as a custom bottom-up
prior estimate are shown in Fig. 6. Starting with the IMI preview, we find that the spatial distribution of prior emissions is much more consistent
with the TROPOMI data (Fig. 6a, compare to Fig. 5b), with a much higher expected DOFS value of 11.7 that reflects the higher prior emissions (and hence the
larger absolute prior error standard deviations). Proceeding to run the IMI workflow, we find that the posterior emissions now total
3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, up 45 % from the prior estimate of 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and with clear demarcation of the two sub-basins. The new scale
factors range from 0.68 to 2.55, reflecting a need for both increased and decreased emissions in different parts of the basin to better match the
satellite data. The averaging kernel sensitivities yield a DOFS value of 10.8 (consistent with the IMI preview), which gives us confidence in the inversion
results both on the basin scale and in the spatial allocation within the basin. In particular, we see the need for more systematic increase in
emissions in the Midland than the Delaware sub-basin.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4500">GEOS-Chem simulations of TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations for May 2018 with <bold>(a)</bold> prior emissions and <bold>(b)</bold> posterior emissions. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the difference between the two. The contour line shows the Permian Basin selected as the region of interest for the inversion. The insets give the mean bias and RMSE for the region of interest in comparison to the TROPOMI observations in Fig. 5a.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5787/2022/gmd-15-5787-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4533">Figure 7 shows the GEOS-Chem simulations for the inversion period with the prior and posterior emissions. The posterior simulation produces much
higher methane concentrations over the Midland sub-basin, better matching the TROPOMI observations of Fig. 5. The mean GEOS-Chem-TROPOMI bias across
the region of interest improves from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the reference simulation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the posterior simulation, and the root
mean square error (RMSE) improves from 14.1 to 11.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A longer inversion would further decrease the bias and improve the RMSE.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4577">Breakdown of IMI runtime by task for a 1-month Permian Basin inversion (May 2018)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IMI task<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wall time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Percentage of total (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Setup<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">764</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Preview</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">133</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spin-up simulation<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">900</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reference and perturbation simulations<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32 921</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">85.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Optimal estimate of emissions<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2240</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Posterior simulation<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1523</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">38 481 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e4589"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Using an AWS EC2 c5.9xlarge instance with 36 CPUs and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GB</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of EBS storage. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> See Sect. 3 for a detailed description of the tasks. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Includes compiling GEOS-Chem, preparing all GEOS-Chem run directories, and fetching input data from S3 (see Fig. 3). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Shared-memory parallelism (36 CPUs) for spin-up and posterior simulations grants <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5–6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> speed-up, limited by input and output. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Run in parallel batches with 1 CPU per simulation. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Solution to Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>)–(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Includes sampling of the GEOS-Chem atmosphere with the TROPOMI operator (see Fig. 2).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Cost</title>
      <p id="d1e4874">We conducted the illustrative inversion presented here on an AWS EC2 c5.9xlarge instance with 36 CPUs and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GB</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of EBS storage. Table 3 shows
the runtime for different components of the IMI workflow. Compute wall time was 10.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85 % of that time spent constructing
the Jacobian matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our cost was USD 17 for an “on-demand” instance, in which the requested resources are made available almost
immediately. A 1-year inversion would cost roughly USD 300 (12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> USD 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> USD 204, plus the cost of additional EBS storage to
accommodate the longer inversion period), and wall time could be reduced by requesting more CPUs at no additional cost since the charge is per
CPU hour. Costs scale linearly with the area of the inversion domain and (for a fixed domain size) the number of state vector elements, again subject
to changes in EBS storage needs. Performing additional inversions with different parameters and prior inventories (Table 2, Sect. 4.2) adds little
cost because there is no need to reconstruct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Data download and transfer between AWS services may incur some cost, but this is also
minimal. A cheaper alternative to on-demand instances are “spot instances”, which tap unused EC2 capacity and can reduce costs by a factor of 3–4
or more (Zhuang et al., 2019). Spot instances can be reclaimed by AWS at any time, which would cause the IMI to crash, but in practice this is rare,
and users can generally expect to retain a spot instance for up to a month of wall time (Pary, 2018).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions and future developments</title>
      <p id="d1e4938">There is a growing demand for tools to infer regional methane emissions with high resolution from satellite data. Our Integrated Methane Inversion
(IMI) workflow addresses this demand by enabling researchers and stakeholders to estimate methane emissions for regions of interest at
0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) resolution by Bayesian inversion of TROPOMI satellite
observations on the AWS cloud, using cutting-edge inversion methodology and without requiring massive data download or advanced technical
expertise. The workflow interfaces with TROPOMI operational data and the GEOS-Chem model already resident on AWS. It makes use of bottom-up emission
inventories, GEOS-FP meteorological data, and boundary conditions (smoothed 3-D TROPOMI fields) that are also stored on AWS. There is no need for
large TROPOMI data download. By automatically accessing all the needed resources on the cloud, the IMI embodies the new paradigm of “bringing compute
to data” when working with very large datasets.</p>
      <p id="d1e4997">We outlined how users can configure and run the workflow to optimize methane emissions for a selected region and period of interest. The configuration
can be as simple as defining the region (latitude–longitude bounds) and time period (start and end dates) or more complex for users wishing to customize
different aspects of the inversion such as the state vector, the prior and observational errors, or the emission inventories used as prior
estimates. The TROPOMI and GEOS-FP data are operationally uploaded to the AWS cloud with a latency of a few days so that continued access to current
conditions is available.</p>
      <p id="d1e5000">The inversion uses an advanced research-grade algorithm to derive the best posterior estimates of emissions on the
0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid by analytical solution to a Bayesian cost function. The analytical solution provides closed-form error
statistics on the posterior estimates and metrics on the information content from the observations including averaging kernel sensitivities and the
degrees of freedom for signal (DOFS). It enables no-cost error analysis by producing an ensemble of solutions to explore the sensitivity to inversion
parameters. The algorithm is fully documented in the literature (Turner et al., 2015; Maasakkers et al., 2019, 2021; Zhang et al., 2021; Lu et al.,
2022), including applications to TROPOMI data (Zhang et al., 2020; Qu et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2021, 2022; Z. Chen et al., 2022). It is described in
detail in the present paper, which can serve as a reference.</p>
      <p id="d1e5028">An IMI preview feature allows users to inspect the TROPOMI data and the anticipated quality of the inversion results for the region and period of
interest before committing to the actual inversion. The IMI preview inspects the TROPOMI data for artifacts correlated with SWIR albedo, determines
the observation density across the region of interest, gives a rough estimate of the DOFS to be expected from the inversion, and compares the spatial
distribution of the prior estimates to the TROPOMI data. Large differences in spatial distributions may require adjustments to the prior estimates for
a successful inversion.</p>
      <p id="d1e5032">We presented an illustrative application of the IMI workflow to a 1-month inversion of TROPOMI observations over the US Permian Basin. We showed how
the DOFS and spatial distribution of prior emissions generated by the IMI preview allowed us to identify the limitations of the initially intended
first inversion, which we fixed by swapping in an improved prior emission inventory. The subsequent inversion was performed at a cost less than USD 20 using an AWS c5.9xlarge “on-demand” instance with 36 CPUs, and could have been a factor of 3–4 cheaper using a “spot” instance.</p>
      <p id="d1e5035">This initial version of the IMI (version 1.0) has some limitations in functionality and does not include some of the newer capabilities recently
developed within the analytical inversion framework. Priority developments for future IMI versions include (1) extension of pre-cut GEOS windows to
continental domains outside of North America, Europe, and Asia; (2) the option to use lognormal rather than normal error pdf's for prior emissions to
resolve the long tail of the emission distribution (Maasakkers et al., 2019; Z. Chen et al., 2022); (3) the option to use non-uniform prior and
observational error covariance matrices, including off-diagonal terms; (4) upgrade of the global GEOS-Chem simulation used to generate boundary
conditions from 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution; (5) more optimal selection of state vector elements
with a Gaussian mixture model (Turner and Jacob, 2015); (6) use of Kalman filter techniques for continuous emission monitoring with user-specified
update frequency (Varon et al., 2022b); (7) incorporation of data from future globally surveying satellite instruments including GeoCarb (Moore et al.,
2018), CO2M (Sierk et al., 2019), MethaneSAT (Wofsy and Hamburg, 2019), and GOSAT-GW (Kasahara et al., 2020); and (8) application to inversions for CO
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. This together with continued improvements to the operational TROPOMI methane product will make the IMI an increasingly
powerful tool for researchers and stakeholders to monitor methane emissions worldwide at high resolution using satellite data.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5104">Source code and documentation for the IMI are available at <uri>https://imi.seas.harvard.edu</uri> (last access: 18 July 2022; Varon et al., 2022a). The code used in this paper is permanently archived at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6578547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6578547</ext-link> (Varon et al., 2022c).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5116">The TROPOMI methane data are available on the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud at <uri>https://registry.opendata.aws/sentinel5p</uri> (last access: 8 June 2022; AWS, 2022). The GEOS-FP emission fields, boundary condition fields, and meteorological fields are available on AWS at <uri>https://registry.opendata.aws/geoschem-input-data</uri>  (AWS, 8 June 2022).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5128">DJV, MS, and DJJ contributed to the study conceptualization. DJV, MS, LAE, WBD, LS, and SEH developed the model code. DJV, DJJ, HN, ZQ, EP, ZC, XL, AL, AT, and CAR contributed to the methods' development. DJV performed the data analysis. DJV wrote the original draft, and all authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.​​​​​​​</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5134">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e5140">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5146">This research has been supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA; Carbon Monitoring System; grant no. 80NSSC21K1057) and the ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company (PO number 620 / 4520099721).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5152">This paper was edited by Fiona O'Connor and reviewed by Christian Frankenberg and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>AWS: Sentinel-5P Level 2, aws [data set], <uri>https://registry.opendata.aws/sentinel5p</uri>, last access: 8 June 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>AWS: GEOS-Chem Input Data, AWS [data set],  <uri>https://registry.opendata.aws/geoschem-input-data</uri>, last access: 8 June 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>Barré, J., Aben, I., Agustí-Panareda, A., Balsamo, G., Bousserez, N., Dueben, P., Engelen, R., Inness, A., Lorente, A., McNorton, J., Peuch, V.-H., Radnoti, G., and Ribas, R.:
Systematic detection of local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies by combining satellite measurements with high-resolution forecasts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5117–5136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5117-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-5117-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation>Bergamaschi, P., Houweling, S., Segers, A., Krol, M., Frankenberg, C., Scheepmaker, R. A., Dlugokencky, E., Wofsy, S. C., Kort, E. A., Sweeney, C., Schuck, T., Brenninkmeijer, C., Chen, H., Beck, V., and Gerbig, C.:
Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the first decade of the 21st century: Inverse modeling analysis using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals and NOAA surface measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7350–7369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50480" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50480</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Lee, M., Turner, A. J., Schroeder, R., Worden, J. R., Weidner, R., McDonald, K. C., and Jacob, D. J.:
A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models (WetCHARTs version 1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2141–2156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>
Brasseur, G. P. and Jacob, D. J.:
Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Schneising, O., Boesch, H., Guerlet, S., Dils, B., Aben, I., Armante, R., Bergamaschi, P., Blumenstock, T., Bovensmann, H., Brunner, D., Buchmann, B., Burrows, J. P., Butz, A., Chédin, A., Chevallier, F., Crevoisier, C. D., Deutscher, N. M., Frankenberg, C., Hase, F., Hasekamp, O. P., Heymann, J., Kaminski, T., Laeng, A., Lichtenberg, G., De Mazière, M., Noël, S., Notholt, J., Orphal, J., Popp, C., Parker, R., Scholze, M., Sussmann, R., Stiller, G. P., Warneke, T., Zehner, C., Bril, A., Crisp, D., Griffith, D. W. T., Kuze, A., O'Dell, C., Oshchepkov, S., Sherlock, V., Suto, H., Wennberg, P., Wunch, D., Yokota, T., and Yoshida, Y.: The Greenhouse Gas Climate Change Initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> global data sets, Remote Sens. Environ., 162, 344–362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.024</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., Frankenberg, C., and Aben, I.:
Retrievals of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from simulated space-borne measurements of backscattered near-infrared sunlight: accounting for aerosol effects, Appl. Optics, 48, 3322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.003322" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.48.003322</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation>Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., Frankenberg, C., Vidot, J., and Aben, I.:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals from spacebased solar backscatter measurements: performance evaluation against simulated aerosol and cirrus loaded scenes, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014514" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014514</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Butz, A., Guerlet, S., Hasekamp, O., Schepers, D., Galli, A., Aben, I., Frankenberg, C., Hartmann, J. M., Tran, H., Kuze, A., Keppel-Aleks, G., Toon, G., Wunch, D., Wennberg, P., Deutscher, N., Griffith, D., Macatangay, R., Messerschmidt, J., Notholt, J., and Warneke, T.:
Toward accurate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations from GOSAT, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L14812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047888" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047888</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Butz, A., Galli, A., Hasekamp, O., Landgraf, J., Tol, P., and Aben, I.:
TROPOMI aboard Sentinel-5 Precursor: Prospective performance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals for aerosol and cirrus loaded atmospheres, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 267–276, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Sherwin, E. D., Berman, E. S. F., Jones, B. B., Gordon, M. P., Wetherley, E. B., Kort, E. A., and Brandt, A. R.:
Quantifying Regional Methane Emissions in the New Mexico Permian Basin with a Comprehensive Aerial Survey, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 4317–4323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06458" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c06458</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y.-H. and Prinn, R. G.:
Estimation of atmospheric methane emissions between 1996 and 2001 using a three-dimensional global chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D10307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006058</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Chen, Z., Jacob, D., Nesser, H., Sulprizio, M., Lorente, A., Varon, D., Lu, X., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Penn, E., and Yu, X.:
Methane emissions from China: a high-resolution inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-303" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2022-303</ext-link>, in review, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>Cui, T., Martin, J., Marzouk, Y. M., Solonen, A., and Spantini, A.:
Likelihood-informed dimension reduction for nonlinear inverse problems, Inverse Probl., 30, 114015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114015</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Cusworth, D. H., Bloom, A. A., Ma, S., Miller, C. E., Bowman, K., Yin, Y., Maasakkers, J. D., Zhang, Y., Scarpelli, T. R., Qu, Z., Jacob, D. J., and Worden, J. R.:
A Bayesian framework for deriving sector-based methane emissions from top-down fluxes, Commun. Earth Environ., 2, 242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00312-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-021-00312-6</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation>Cusworth, D. H., Duren, R. M., Thorpe, A. K., Olson-Duvall, W., Heckler, J., Chapman, J. W., Eastwood, M. L., Helmlinger, M. C., Green, R. O., Asner, G. P., Dennison, P. E., and Miller, C. E.:
Intermittency of large methane emitters in the Permian Basin, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 8, 567–573,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>de Gouw, J. A., Veefkind, J. P., Roosenbrand, E., Dix, B., Lin, J. C., Landgraf, J., and Levelt, P. F.:
Daily Satellite Observations of Methane from Oil and Gas Production Regions in the United States, Sci. Rep., 10, 1379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57678-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-57678-4</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>EC and USA:
Global Methane Pledge, European Commission and United States of America, <uri>https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/global-methane-pledge</uri> (last access: 8 June 2022), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>ECCC:
National Inventory Report 1990-2018: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Gatineau, QC, <ext-link xlink:href="http://publications.gc.ca/pub?id=9.506002&amp;sl=0">http://publications.gc.ca/pub?id=9.506002&amp;sl=0</ext-link> (last access: October 2020), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>EPA:
Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, <uri>https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/us-greenhouse-gas-inventory-report-1990-2014</uri> (last access: 18 July 2022), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation>Etiope, G., Ciotoli, G., Schwietzke, S., and Schoell, M.:
Gridded maps of geological methane emissions and their isotopic signature, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-11-1-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>Fung, I., John, J., Lerner, J., Matthews, E., Prather, M., Steele, L. P., and Fraser, P. J.:
Three-dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96, 13033–13065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD01247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JD01247</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>Hachmeister, J., Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Lorente, A., Borsdorff, T., Burrows, J. P., Notholt, J., and Buschmann, M.: On the influence of underlying elevation data on Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOMI satellite methane retrievals over Greenland, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4063–4074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4063-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-4063-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation>
Hansen, P. C.:
The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems, IMM Tech. Rep. 15/1999, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation>Hasekamp, O., Lorente, A., Hu, H., Butz, A., aan de Brugh, J., and Landgraf, J.:
Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document for Sentinel-5 Precursor Methane Retrieval, Sron-S5P-Lev2-Rp-001, (v1.10), European Space Agency technical document, 1–67, European Space Agency, <uri>https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2476257/Sentinel-5P-TROPOMI-ATBD-Methane-retrieval</uri> (last access: 23 November 2021), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Hmiel, B., Petrenko, V. V., Dyonisius, M. N., Buizert, C., Smith, A. M., Place, P. F., Harth, C., Beaudette, R., Hua, Q., Yang, B., Vimont, I., Michel, S. E., Severinghaus, J. P., Etheridge, D., Bromley, T., Schmitt, J., Faïn, X., Weiss, R. F., and Dlugokencky, E.:
Preindustrial 14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates greater anthropogenic fossil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, Nature, 578, 409–412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation>Hu, H., Hasekamp, O., Butz, A., Galli, A., Landgraf, J., Aan de Brugh, J., Borsdorff, T., Scheepmaker, R., and Aben, I.:
The operational methane retrieval algorithm for TROPOMI, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5423–5440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5423-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-5423-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>Hu, H., Landgraf, J., Detmers, R., Borsdorff, T., Aan de Brugh, J., Aben, I., Butz, A., and Hasekamp, O.:
Toward global mapping of methane with TROPOMI: First results and intersatellite comparison to GOSAT, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 3682–3689, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2018GL077259</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>
INECC and SEMARNAT:
Sexta Comunicación Nacional y Segundo Informe Bienal de Actualización ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático, Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (INECC) and Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), México, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>
IPCC:
2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, edited by: Calvo Buendia, E., Tanabe, K., Kranjc, A., Jamsranjav, B., Fukuda, M., Ngarize, S., Osako, A., Pyrozhenko, Y., Shermanau, P., and Federici, S., IPCC, Switzerland, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Irakulis-Loitxate, I., Guanter, L., Liu, Y. N., Varon, D. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Zhang, Y., Chulakadabba, A., Wofsy, S. C., Thorpe, A. K., Duren, R. M., Frankenberg, C., Lyon, D. R., Hmiel, B., Cusworth, D. H., Zhang, Y., Segl, K., Gorroño, J., Sánchez-García, E., Sulprizio, M. P., Cao, K., Zhu, H., Liang, J., Li, X., Aben, I., and Jacob, D. J.:
Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin, Sci. Adv., 7, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf4507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abf4507</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Jacob, D. J., Turner, A. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Sheng, J., Sun, K., Liu, X., Chance, K., Aben, I., McKeever, J., and Frankenberg, C.:
Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14371–14396, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation>Janssens-Maenhout, G., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Dentener, F., Bergamaschi, P., Pagliari, V., Olivier, J. G. J., Peters, J. A. H. W., van Aardenne, J. A., Monni, S., Doering, U., Petrescu, A. M. R., Solazzo, E., and Oreggioni, G. D.:
EDGAR v4.3.2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970–2012, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 959–1002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-959-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-11-959-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Kasahara, M., Kachi, M., Inaoka, K., Fujii, H., Kubota, T., Shimada, R., and Kojima, Y.: Overview and current status of GOSAT-GW mission and AMSR3 instrument, in: Proc. SPIE 11530, Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXIV, 1153007 (20 September 2020), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2573914" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/12.2573914</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Travis, K., Yu, K., Zhu, L., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., Hair, J. W., Fenn, M. A., Butler, C. F., Wagner, N. L., Gordon, T. D., Welti, A., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Teng, A. P., Millet, D. B., Schwarz, J. P., Markovic, M. Z., and Perring, A. E.:
Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10411–10433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Lin, H., Jacob, D. J., Lundgren, E. W., Sulprizio, M. P., Keller, C. A., Fritz, T. M., Eastham, S. D., Emmons, L. K., Campbell, P. C., Baker, B., Saylor, R. D., and Montuoro, R.:
Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5487–5506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>Lorente, A., Borsdorff, T., Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., aan de Brugh, J., Schneider, A., Wu, L., Hase, F., Kivi, R., Wunch, D., Pollard, D. F., Shiomi, K., Deutscher, N. M., Velazco, V. A., Roehl, C. M., Wennberg, P. O., Warneke, T., and Landgraf, J.:
Methane retrieved from TROPOMI: improvement of the data product and validation of the first 2 years of measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 665–684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-665-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-665-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 38?><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y., Maasakkers, J. D., Sulprizio, M. P., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Scarpelli, T. R., Nesser, H., Yantosca, R. M., Sheng, J., Andrews, A., Parker, R. J., Boesch, H., Bloom, A. A., and Ma, S.:
Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4637–4657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Jacob, D. J., Wang, H., Maasakkers, J. D., Zhang, Y., Scarpelli, T. R., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Sulprizio, M. P., Nesser, H., Bloom, A. A., Ma, S., Worden, J. R., Fan, S., Parker, R. J., Boesch, H., Gautam, R., Gordon, D., Moran, M. D., Reuland, F., Villasana, C. A. O., and Andrews, A.:
Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 395–418, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-395-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-395-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation>Lyon, D. R., Hmiel, B., Gautam, R., Omara, M., Roberts, K. A., Barkley, Z. R., Davis, K. J., Miles, N. L., Monteiro, V. C., Richardson, S. J., Conley, S., Smith, M. L., Jacob, D. J., Shen, L., Varon, D. J., Deng, A., Rudelis, X., Sharma, N., Story, K. T., Brandt, A. R., Kang, M., Kort, E. A., Marchese, A. J., and Hamburg, S. P.:
Concurrent variation in oil and gas methane emissions and oil price during the COVID-19 pandemic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6605–6626, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>
Maasakkers, J. D., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Turner, A. J., Weitz, M., Wirth, T., Hight, C., DeFigueiredo, M., Desai, M., and Schmeltz, R.:
Gridded national inventory of US methane emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 13123–13133, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>Maasakkers, J. D., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Scarpelli, T. R., Nesser, H., Sheng, J.-X., Zhang, Y., Hersher, M., Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Worden, J. R., Janssens-Maenhout, G., and Parker, R. J.:
Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7859–7881, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Maasakkers, J. D., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Scarpelli, T. R., Nesser, H., Sheng, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Worden, J. R., and Parker, R. J.:
2010–2015 North American methane emissions, sectoral contributions, and trends: a high-resolution inversion of GOSAT observations of atmospheric methane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4339–4356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4339-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-4339-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Miller, S. M., Michalak, A. M., Detmers, R. G., Hasekamp, O. P., Bruhwiler, L. M. P., and Schwietzke, S.:
China's coal mine methane regulations have not curbed growing emissions, Nat. Commun., 10, 303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07891-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-07891-7</ext-link>, 865, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation>Moore, B., Crowell, S. M. R., Rayner, P. J., Kumer, J., O'Dell, C. W., O'Brien, D., Utembe, S., Polonsky, I., Schimel, D., and Lemen, J.: The Potential of the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb) to Provide Multi-scale Constraints on the Carbon Cycle in the Americas, Front. Environ. Sci., 6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fenvs.2018.00109</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>Murguia-Flores, F., Arndt, S., Ganesan, A. L., Murray-Tortarolo, G., and Hornibrook, E. R. C.:
Soil Methanotrophy Model (MeMo v1.0): a process-based model to quantify global uptake of atmospheric methane by soil, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2009–2032, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2009-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-2009-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Nesser, H., Jacob, D. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Scarpelli, T. R., Sulprizio, M. P., Zhang, Y., and Rycroft, C. H.:
Reduced-cost construction of Jacobian matrices for high-resolution inversions of satellite observations of atmospheric composition, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5521–5534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5521-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-5521-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 48?><mixed-citation>
Omara, M., Zimmerman, N., Sullivan, M. R., Li, X., Ellis, A., Cesa, R., Subramanian, R., Presto, A. A., and Robinson, A. L.:
Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Data Synthesis and National Estimate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 12915–12925, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation>Pary, R.:
New Amazon EC2 Spot pricing model: Simplified purchasing without bidding and fewer interruptions, AWS Compute Blog, 13 March, <uri>https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/new-amazon-ec2-spot-pricing/</uri> (last accessed: 23 November 2021), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>Qu, Z., Jacob, D. J., Shen, L., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Scarpelli, T. R., Nesser, H., Sulprizio, M. P., Maasakkers, J. D., Bloom, A. A., Worden, J. R., Parker, R. J., and Delgado, A. L.:
Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14159–14175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 51?><mixed-citation>Randerson, J. T., van der Werf, G. R., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.:
Global Fire Emissions Database, Version 4.1 (GFEDv4), ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1293</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 52?><mixed-citation>Robertson, A., Edie, R., Field, R. A., Lyon, D. R., McVay, R., Omara, M., Zavala-Araiza, D., and Murphy, S. M.:
New Mexico Permian Basin Well Pad Methane Emissions are a Factor of 6–13 Times Higher Than US EPA Estimates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 13926–13934, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02927" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c02927</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.:
Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, World Scientific, River Edge, USA, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., Castaldi, S., Chandra, N., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P. M., Covey, K., Curry, C. L., Etiope, G., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Hegglin, M. I., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Hugelius, G., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Jensen, K. M., Joos, F., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Laruelle, G. G., Liu, L., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., McNorton, J., Miller, P. A., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Naik, V., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., O'Doherty, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Regnier, P., Riley, W. J., Rosentreter, J. A., Segers, A., Simpson, I. J., Shi, H., Smith, S. J., Steele, L. P., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Tubiello, F. N., Tsuruta, A., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weber, T. S., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R. F., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Yin, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.:
The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1561–1623, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation>Scarpelli, T. R., Jacob, D. J., Octaviano Villasana, C. A., Ramirez Hernandez, I. F., Cardenas Moreno, P. R., Cortes Alfaro, E. A., Garcia Garcia, M. A., and Zavala-Araiza, D.:
A gridded inventory of anthropogenic methane emissions from Mexico based on Mexico's National Inventory of Greenhouse Gases and Compounds, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 105015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5FUTWM" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7910/DVN/5FUTWM</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>Scarpelli, T. R., Jacob, D. J., Moran, M., Reuland, F., and Gordon, D.: A gridded inventory of Canada's anthropogenic methane emissions, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 014007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac40b1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ac40b1</ext-link>, 2022a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation>Scarpelli, T. R., Jacob, D. J., Grossman, S., Lu, X., Qu, Z., Sulprizio, M. P., Zhang, Y., Reuland, F., Gordon, D., and Worden, J. R.:
Updated Global Fuel Exploitation Inventory (GFEI) for methane emissions from the oil, gas, and coal sectors: evaluation with inversions of atmospheric methane observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3235–3249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3235-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-3235-2022</ext-link>, 2022b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation>Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Borsdorff, T., Deutscher, N. M., Feist, D. G., Griffith, D. W. T., Hase, F., Hermans, C., Iraci, L. T., Kivi, R., Landgraf, J., Morino, I., Notholt, J., Petri, C., Pollard, D. F., Roche, S., Shiomi, K., Strong, K., Sussmann, R., Velazco, V. A., Warneke, T., and Wunch, D.:
A scientific algorithm to simultaneously retrieve carbon monoxide and methane from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6771–6802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6771-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-6771-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 60?><mixed-citation>Shen, L., Zavala-Araiza, D., Gautam, R., Omara, M., Scarpelli, T., Sheng, J., Sulprizio, M. P., Zhuang, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Hamburg, S. P., and Jacob, D. J.:
Unravelling a large methane emission discrepancy in Mexico using satellite observations, Remote Sens. Environ., 260, 112461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2021.112461</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Shen, L., Gautam, R., Omara, M., Zavala-Araiza, D., Maasakkers, J., Scarpelli, T., Lorente, A., Lyon, D., Sheng, J., Varon, D., Nesser, H., Qu, Z., Lu, X., Sulprizio, M., Hamburg, S., and Jacob, D.:
Satellite quantification of oil and natural gas methane emissions in the US and Canada including contributions from individual basins, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2022-155</ext-link>, in review, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation>Sierk, B., Bézy, J.-L., Löscher, A., and Meijer, Y.:
The European <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Monitoring Mission: observing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from space, in: Proc. SPIE 11180, International Conference on Space Optics – ICSO 2018, 111800M (12 July 2019), Chania, Greece, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2535941" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/12.2535941</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 63?><mixed-citation>Stanevich, I., Jones, D. B. A., Strong, K., Parker, R. J., Boesch, H., Wunch, D., Notholt, J., Petri, C., Warneke, T., Sussmann, R., Schneider, M., Hase, F., Kivi, R., Deutscher, N. M., Velazco, V. A., Walker, K. A., and Deng, F.:
Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 of GEOS-Chem and v35j of its adjoint model, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3839–3862, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation>Turner, A. J. and Jacob, D. J.:
Balancing aggregation and smoothing errors in inverse models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7039–7048, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7039-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7039-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation>Turner, A. J., Jacob, D. J., Wecht, K. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Lundgren, E., Andrews, A. E., Biraud, S. C., Boesch, H., Bowman, K. W., Deutscher, N. M., Dubey, M. K., Griffith, D. W. T., Hase, F., Kuze, A., Notholt, J., Ohyama, H., Parker, R., Payne, V. H., Sussmann, R., Sweeney, C., Velazco, V. A., Warneke, T., Wennberg, P. O., and Wunch, D.:
Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7049–7069, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7049-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7049-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Varon, D. J., Estrada, L. A., Sulprizio, M., and Jacob, D. J.: Integrated Methane Inversion Website, IMI [code], <uri>https://imi.seas.harvard.edu/</uri> (last access: 18 July 2022), 2022a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 66?><mixed-citation>
Varon, D. J., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Nesser, H., Gautam, R., Omara, M., Hmiel, B., Lyon, D., Delgado, A. L., Maasakkers, J., and Aben, I.:
Continuous weekly monitoring of methane emissions from the Permian Basin by inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations (2A.2), American Meteorological Society 102nd annual meeting, 24 January 2022, Houston, Texas, January 2022b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>Varon, D. J., Laestrada, W. D., and Jiawei, Z.​​​​​​​: geoschem/integrated_methane_inversion: imi 1.0.0-beta.2 release (imi-1.0.0-beta.2), Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6578547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6578547</ext-link>, 2022c.​​​​​​​</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation>Wecht, K. J., Jacob, D. J., Frankenberg, C., Jiang, Z., and Blake, D. R.:
Mapping of North America methane emissions with high spatial resolution by inversion of SCIAMACHY satellite data, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 7741–7756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021551</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation>
Wofsy, S. C. and Hamburg, S.:
MethaneSAT – A new observing platform for high resolution measurements of methane and carbon dioxide, AGU Fall Meeting 2019, A53F–02, 13 December 2019, San Francisco, California, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation>Wunch, D., Toon, G. C., Blavier, J.-F. L., Washenfelder, R. A., Notholt, J., Connor, B. J., Griffith, D. W. T., Sherlock, V., and Wennberg, P. O.:
The Total Carbon Column Observing Network, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 369, 2087–2112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0240" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2010.0240</ext-link>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation>Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., Toon, G. C., Connor, B. J., Fisher, B., Osterman, G. B., Frankenberg, C., Mandrake, L., O'Dell, C., Ahonen, P., Biraud, S. C., Castano, R., Cressie, N., Crisp, D., Deutscher, N. M., Eldering, A., Fisher, M. L., Griffith, D. W. T., Gunson, M., Heikkinen, P., Keppel-Aleks, G., Kyrö, E., Lindenmaier, R., Macatangay, R., Mendonca, J., Messerschmidt, J., Miller, C. E., Morino, I., Notholt, J., Oyafuso, F. A., Rettinger, M., Robinson, J., Roehl, C. M., Salawitch, R. J., Sherlock, V., Strong, K., Sussmann, R., Tanaka, T., Thompson, D. R., Uchino, O., Warneke, T., and Wofsy, S. C.:
A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total columns from space, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12317–12337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12317-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12317-2011</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 71?><mixed-citation>Yang, C., Huang, Q., Li, Z., Liu, K., and Hu, F.:
Big Data and cloud computing: innovation opportunities and challenges, Int. J. Digit. Earth, 10, 13–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1239771" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/17538947.2016.1239771</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>Yu, X., Millet, D. B., and Henze, D. K.:
How well can inverse analyses of high-resolution satellite data resolve heterogeneous methane fluxes? Observing system simulation experiments with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (v35), Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7775–7793, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Liu, L., Zhao, Y., Gong, S., Zhang, X., Henze, D. K., Capps, S. L., Fu, T.-M., Zhang, Q., and Wang, Y.:
Source attribution of particulate matter pollution over North China with the adjoint method, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 084011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084011</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 74?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Gautam, R., Pandey, S., Omara, M., Maasakkers, J. D., Sadavarte, P., Lyon, D., Nesser, H., Sulprizio, M. P., Varon, D. J., Zhang, R., Houweling, S., Zavala-Araiza, D., Alvarez, R. A., Lorente, A., Hamburg, S. P., Aben, I., and Jacob, D. J.:
Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space, Sci. Adv., 6, 17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aaz5120</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 75?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Jacob, D. J., Lu, X., Maasakkers, J. D., Scarpelli, T. R., Sheng, J.-X., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Sulprizio, M. P., Chang, J., Bloom, A. A., Ma, S., Worden, J., Parker, R. J., and Boesch, H.:
Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3643–3666, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 76?><mixed-citation>Zhuang, J., Jacob, D. J., Gaya, J. F., Yantosca, R. M., Lundgren, E. W., Sulprizio, M. P., and Eastham, S. D.:
Enabling immediate access to Earth science models through cloud computing: application to the GEOS-Chem model, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1943–1960, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-18-0243.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-18-0243.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 77?><mixed-citation>Zhuang, J., Jacob, D. J., Lin, H., Lundgren, E. W., Yantosca, R. M., Flo Gaya, J., Sulprizio, M. P., and Eastham, S. D.:
Enabling High-Performance Cloud Computing for Earth Science Modeling on Over a Thousand Cores: Application to the GEOS-Chem Atmospheric Chemistry Model, J. Adv. Model Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020MS002064</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0): a user-friendly, cloud-based facility for inferring high-resolution methane emissions from TROPOMI satellite observations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
AWS: Sentinel-5P Level 2, aws [data set], <a href="https://registry.opendata.aws/sentinel5p" target="_blank"/>, last access: 8 June 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
AWS: GEOS-Chem Input Data, AWS [data set],  <a href="https://registry.opendata.aws/geoschem-input-data" target="_blank"/>, last access: 8 June 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Barré, J., Aben, I., Agustí-Panareda, A., Balsamo, G., Bousserez, N., Dueben, P., Engelen, R., Inness, A., Lorente, A., McNorton, J., Peuch, V.-H., Radnoti, G., and Ribas, R.:
Systematic detection of local CH<sub>4</sub> anomalies by combining satellite measurements with high-resolution forecasts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5117–5136, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5117-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5117-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bergamaschi, P., Houweling, S., Segers, A., Krol, M., Frankenberg, C., Scheepmaker, R. A., Dlugokencky, E., Wofsy, S. C., Kort, E. A., Sweeney, C., Schuck, T., Brenninkmeijer, C., Chen, H., Beck, V., and Gerbig, C.:
Atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> in the first decade of the 21st century: Inverse modeling analysis using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals and NOAA surface measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7350–7369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50480" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50480</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Lee, M., Turner, A. J., Schroeder, R., Worden, J. R., Weidner, R., McDonald, K. C., and Jacob, D. J.:
A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models (WetCHARTs version 1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2141–2156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brasseur, G. P. and Jacob, D. J.:
Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Schneising, O., Boesch, H., Guerlet, S., Dils, B., Aben, I., Armante, R., Bergamaschi, P., Blumenstock, T., Bovensmann, H., Brunner, D., Buchmann, B., Burrows, J. P., Butz, A., Chédin, A., Chevallier, F., Crevoisier, C. D., Deutscher, N. M., Frankenberg, C., Hase, F., Hasekamp, O. P., Heymann, J., Kaminski, T., Laeng, A., Lichtenberg, G., De Mazière, M., Noël, S., Notholt, J., Orphal, J., Popp, C., Parker, R., Scholze, M., Sussmann, R., Stiller, G. P., Warneke, T., Zehner, C., Bril, A., Crisp, D., Griffith, D. W. T., Kuze, A., O'Dell, C., Oshchepkov, S., Sherlock, V., Suto, H., Wennberg, P., Wunch, D., Yokota, T., and Yoshida, Y.: The Greenhouse Gas Climate Change Initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> global data sets, Remote Sens. Environ., 162, 344–362, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.024</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., Frankenberg, C., and Aben, I.:
Retrievals of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> from simulated space-borne measurements of backscattered near-infrared sunlight: accounting for aerosol effects, Appl. Optics, 48, 3322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.003322" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.003322</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., Frankenberg, C., Vidot, J., and Aben, I.:
CH<sub>4</sub> retrievals from spacebased solar backscatter measurements: performance evaluation against simulated aerosol and cirrus loaded scenes, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014514" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014514</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Butz, A., Guerlet, S., Hasekamp, O., Schepers, D., Galli, A., Aben, I., Frankenberg, C., Hartmann, J. M., Tran, H., Kuze, A., Keppel-Aleks, G., Toon, G., Wunch, D., Wennberg, P., Deutscher, N., Griffith, D., Macatangay, R., Messerschmidt, J., Notholt, J., and Warneke, T.:
Toward accurate CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> observations from GOSAT, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L14812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047888" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047888</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Butz, A., Galli, A., Hasekamp, O., Landgraf, J., Tol, P., and Aben, I.:
TROPOMI aboard Sentinel-5 Precursor: Prospective performance of CH<sub>4</sub> retrievals for aerosol and cirrus loaded atmospheres, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 267–276, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Sherwin, E. D., Berman, E. S. F., Jones, B. B., Gordon, M. P., Wetherley, E. B., Kort, E. A., and Brandt, A. R.:
Quantifying Regional Methane Emissions in the New Mexico Permian Basin with a Comprehensive Aerial Survey, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 4317–4323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06458" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06458</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y.-H. and Prinn, R. G.:
Estimation of atmospheric methane emissions between 1996 and 2001 using a three-dimensional global chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D10307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006058</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Z., Jacob, D., Nesser, H., Sulprizio, M., Lorente, A., Varon, D., Lu, X., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Penn, E., and Yu, X.:
Methane emissions from China: a high-resolution inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-303" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-303</a>, in review, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cui, T., Martin, J., Marzouk, Y. M., Solonen, A., and Spantini, A.:
Likelihood-informed dimension reduction for nonlinear inverse problems, Inverse Probl., 30, 114015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114015</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cusworth, D. H., Bloom, A. A., Ma, S., Miller, C. E., Bowman, K., Yin, Y., Maasakkers, J. D., Zhang, Y., Scarpelli, T. R., Qu, Z., Jacob, D. J., and Worden, J. R.:
A Bayesian framework for deriving sector-based methane emissions from top-down fluxes, Commun. Earth Environ., 2, 242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00312-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00312-6</a>, 2021a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cusworth, D. H., Duren, R. M., Thorpe, A. K., Olson-Duvall, W., Heckler, J., Chapman, J. W., Eastwood, M. L., Helmlinger, M. C., Green, R. O., Asner, G. P., Dennison, P. E., and Miller, C. E.:
Intermittency of large methane emitters in the Permian Basin, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 8, 567–573,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00173</a>, 2021b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
de Gouw, J. A., Veefkind, J. P., Roosenbrand, E., Dix, B., Lin, J. C., Landgraf, J., and Levelt, P. F.:
Daily Satellite Observations of Methane from Oil and Gas Production Regions in the United States, Sci. Rep., 10, 1379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57678-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57678-4</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
EC and USA:
Global Methane Pledge, European Commission and United States of America, <a href="https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/global-methane-pledge" target="_blank"/> (last access: 8 June 2022), 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
ECCC:
National Inventory Report 1990-2018: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Gatineau, QC, <a href="http://publications.gc.ca/pub?id=9.506002&amp;sl=0" target="_blank">http://publications.gc.ca/pub?id=9.506002&amp;sl=0</a> (last access: October 2020), 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
EPA:
Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, <a href="https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/us-greenhouse-gas-inventory-report-1990-2014" target="_blank"/> (last access: 18 July 2022), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Etiope, G., Ciotoli, G., Schwietzke, S., and Schoell, M.:
Gridded maps of geological methane emissions and their isotopic signature, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fung, I., John, J., Lerner, J., Matthews, E., Prather, M., Steele, L. P., and Fraser, P. J.:
Three-dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 96, 13033–13065, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD01247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD01247</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hachmeister, J., Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Lorente, A., Borsdorff, T., Burrows, J. P., Notholt, J., and Buschmann, M.: On the influence of underlying elevation data on Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOMI satellite methane retrievals over Greenland, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4063–4074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4063-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4063-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, P. C.:
The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems, IMM Tech. Rep. 15/1999, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hasekamp, O., Lorente, A., Hu, H., Butz, A., aan de Brugh, J., and Landgraf, J.:
Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document for Sentinel-5 Precursor Methane Retrieval, Sron-S5P-Lev2-Rp-001, (v1.10), European Space Agency technical document, 1–67, European Space Agency, <a href="https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2476257/Sentinel-5P-TROPOMI-ATBD-Methane-retrieval" target="_blank"/> (last access: 23 November 2021), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hmiel, B., Petrenko, V. V., Dyonisius, M. N., Buizert, C., Smith, A. M., Place, P. F., Harth, C., Beaudette, R., Hua, Q., Yang, B., Vimont, I., Michel, S. E., Severinghaus, J. P., Etheridge, D., Bromley, T., Schmitt, J., Faïn, X., Weiss, R. F., and Dlugokencky, E.:
Preindustrial 14CH<sub>4</sub> indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, Nature, 578, 409–412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, H., Hasekamp, O., Butz, A., Galli, A., Landgraf, J., Aan de Brugh, J., Borsdorff, T., Scheepmaker, R., and Aben, I.:
The operational methane retrieval algorithm for TROPOMI, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5423–5440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5423-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5423-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, H., Landgraf, J., Detmers, R., Borsdorff, T., Aan de Brugh, J., Aben, I., Butz, A., and Hasekamp, O.:
Toward global mapping of methane with TROPOMI: First results and intersatellite comparison to GOSAT, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 3682–3689, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077259</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
INECC and SEMARNAT:
Sexta Comunicación Nacional y Segundo Informe Bienal de Actualización ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático, Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (INECC) and Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), México, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC:
2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, edited by: Calvo Buendia, E., Tanabe, K., Kranjc, A., Jamsranjav, B., Fukuda, M., Ngarize, S., Osako, A., Pyrozhenko, Y., Shermanau, P., and Federici, S., IPCC, Switzerland, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Irakulis-Loitxate, I., Guanter, L., Liu, Y. N., Varon, D. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Zhang, Y., Chulakadabba, A., Wofsy, S. C., Thorpe, A. K., Duren, R. M., Frankenberg, C., Lyon, D. R., Hmiel, B., Cusworth, D. H., Zhang, Y., Segl, K., Gorroño, J., Sánchez-García, E., Sulprizio, M. P., Cao, K., Zhu, H., Liang, J., Li, X., Aben, I., and Jacob, D. J.:
Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin, Sci. Adv., 7, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf4507" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf4507</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D. J., Turner, A. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Sheng, J., Sun, K., Liu, X., Chance, K., Aben, I., McKeever, J., and Frankenberg, C.:
Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14371–14396, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Janssens-Maenhout, G., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Dentener, F., Bergamaschi, P., Pagliari, V., Olivier, J. G. J., Peters, J. A. H. W., van Aardenne, J. A., Monni, S., Doering, U., Petrescu, A. M. R., Solazzo, E., and Oreggioni, G. D.:
EDGAR v4.3.2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970–2012, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 959–1002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-959-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-959-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kasahara, M., Kachi, M., Inaoka, K., Fujii, H., Kubota, T., Shimada, R., and Kojima, Y.: Overview and current status of GOSAT-GW mission and AMSR3 instrument, in: Proc. SPIE 11530, Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXIV, 1153007 (20 September 2020), <a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2573914" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2573914</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Travis, K., Yu, K., Zhu, L., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., Hair, J. W., Fenn, M. A., Butler, C. F., Wagner, N. L., Gordon, T. D., Welti, A., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Teng, A. P., Millet, D. B., Schwarz, J. P., Markovic, M. Z., and Perring, A. E.:
Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10411–10433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, H., Jacob, D. J., Lundgren, E. W., Sulprizio, M. P., Keller, C. A., Fritz, T. M., Eastham, S. D., Emmons, L. K., Campbell, P. C., Baker, B., Saylor, R. D., and Montuoro, R.:
Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5487–5506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lorente, A., Borsdorff, T., Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., aan de Brugh, J., Schneider, A., Wu, L., Hase, F., Kivi, R., Wunch, D., Pollard, D. F., Shiomi, K., Deutscher, N. M., Velazco, V. A., Roehl, C. M., Wennberg, P. O., Warneke, T., and Landgraf, J.:
Methane retrieved from TROPOMI: improvement of the data product and validation of the first 2 years of measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 665–684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-665-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-665-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, X., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y., Maasakkers, J. D., Sulprizio, M. P., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Scarpelli, T. R., Nesser, H., Yantosca, R. M., Sheng, J., Andrews, A., Parker, R. J., Boesch, H., Bloom, A. A., and Ma, S.:
Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4637–4657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, X., Jacob, D. J., Wang, H., Maasakkers, J. D., Zhang, Y., Scarpelli, T. R., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Sulprizio, M. P., Nesser, H., Bloom, A. A., Ma, S., Worden, J. R., Fan, S., Parker, R. J., Boesch, H., Gautam, R., Gordon, D., Moran, M. D., Reuland, F., Villasana, C. A. O., and Andrews, A.:
Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 395–418, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-395-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-395-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lyon, D. R., Hmiel, B., Gautam, R., Omara, M., Roberts, K. A., Barkley, Z. R., Davis, K. J., Miles, N. L., Monteiro, V. C., Richardson, S. J., Conley, S., Smith, M. L., Jacob, D. J., Shen, L., Varon, D. J., Deng, A., Rudelis, X., Sharma, N., Story, K. T., Brandt, A. R., Kang, M., Kort, E. A., Marchese, A. J., and Hamburg, S. P.:
Concurrent variation in oil and gas methane emissions and oil price during the COVID-19 pandemic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6605–6626, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6605-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Maasakkers, J. D., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Turner, A. J., Weitz, M., Wirth, T., Hight, C., DeFigueiredo, M., Desai, M., and Schmeltz, R.:
Gridded national inventory of US methane emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 13123–13133, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Maasakkers, J. D., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Scarpelli, T. R., Nesser, H., Sheng, J.-X., Zhang, Y., Hersher, M., Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Worden, J. R., Janssens-Maenhout, G., and Parker, R. J.:
Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7859–7881, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Maasakkers, J. D., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Scarpelli, T. R., Nesser, H., Sheng, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Worden, J. R., and Parker, R. J.:
2010–2015 North American methane emissions, sectoral contributions, and trends: a high-resolution inversion of GOSAT observations of atmospheric methane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4339–4356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4339-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4339-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, S. M., Michalak, A. M., Detmers, R. G., Hasekamp, O. P., Bruhwiler, L. M. P., and Schwietzke, S.:
China's coal mine methane regulations have not curbed growing emissions, Nat. Commun., 10, 303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07891-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07891-7</a>, 865, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, B., Crowell, S. M. R., Rayner, P. J., Kumer, J., O'Dell, C. W., O'Brien, D., Utembe, S., Polonsky, I., Schimel, D., and Lemen, J.: The Potential of the Geostationary Carbon Cycle Observatory (GeoCarb) to Provide Multi-scale Constraints on the Carbon Cycle in the Americas, Front. Environ. Sci., 6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00109</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Murguia-Flores, F., Arndt, S., Ganesan, A. L., Murray-Tortarolo, G., and Hornibrook, E. R. C.:
Soil Methanotrophy Model (MeMo v1.0): a process-based model to quantify global uptake of atmospheric methane by soil, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2009–2032, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2009-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2009-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Nesser, H., Jacob, D. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Scarpelli, T. R., Sulprizio, M. P., Zhang, Y., and Rycroft, C. H.:
Reduced-cost construction of Jacobian matrices for high-resolution inversions of satellite observations of atmospheric composition, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5521–5534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5521-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5521-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Omara, M., Zimmerman, N., Sullivan, M. R., Li, X., Ellis, A., Cesa, R., Subramanian, R., Presto, A. A., and Robinson, A. L.:
Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Data Synthesis and National Estimate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 12915–12925, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Pary, R.:
New Amazon EC2 Spot pricing model: Simplified purchasing without bidding and fewer interruptions, AWS Compute Blog, 13 March, <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/new-amazon-ec2-spot-pricing/" target="_blank"/> (last accessed: 23 November 2021), 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Qu, Z., Jacob, D. J., Shen, L., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Scarpelli, T. R., Nesser, H., Sulprizio, M. P., Maasakkers, J. D., Bloom, A. A., Worden, J. R., Parker, R. J., and Delgado, A. L.:
Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14159–14175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Randerson, J. T., van der Werf, G. R., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.:
Global Fire Emissions Database, Version 4.1 (GFEDv4), ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1293</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Robertson, A., Edie, R., Field, R. A., Lyon, D. R., McVay, R., Omara, M., Zavala-Araiza, D., and Murphy, S. M.:
New Mexico Permian Basin Well Pad Methane Emissions are a Factor of 6–13 Times Higher Than US EPA Estimates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 13926–13934, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02927" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02927</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.:
Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, World Scientific, River Edge, USA, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., Castaldi, S., Chandra, N., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P. M., Covey, K., Curry, C. L., Etiope, G., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Hegglin, M. I., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Hugelius, G., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Jensen, K. M., Joos, F., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Laruelle, G. G., Liu, L., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., McNorton, J., Miller, P. A., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Naik, V., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., O'Doherty, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Regnier, P., Riley, W. J., Rosentreter, J. A., Segers, A., Simpson, I. J., Shi, H., Smith, S. J., Steele, L. P., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Tubiello, F. N., Tsuruta, A., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weber, T. S., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R. F., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Yin, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.:
The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1561–1623, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Scarpelli, T. R., Jacob, D. J., Octaviano Villasana, C. A., Ramirez Hernandez, I. F., Cardenas Moreno, P. R., Cortes Alfaro, E. A., Garcia Garcia, M. A., and Zavala-Araiza, D.:
A gridded inventory of anthropogenic methane emissions from Mexico based on Mexico's National Inventory of Greenhouse Gases and Compounds, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 105015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5FUTWM" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5FUTWM</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Scarpelli, T. R., Jacob, D. J., Moran, M., Reuland, F., and Gordon, D.: A gridded inventory of Canada's anthropogenic methane emissions, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 014007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac40b1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac40b1</a>, 2022a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Scarpelli, T. R., Jacob, D. J., Grossman, S., Lu, X., Qu, Z., Sulprizio, M. P., Zhang, Y., Reuland, F., Gordon, D., and Worden, J. R.:
Updated Global Fuel Exploitation Inventory (GFEI) for methane emissions from the oil, gas, and coal sectors: evaluation with inversions of atmospheric methane observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3235–3249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3235-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3235-2022</a>, 2022b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Schneising, O., Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Borsdorff, T., Deutscher, N. M., Feist, D. G., Griffith, D. W. T., Hase, F., Hermans, C., Iraci, L. T., Kivi, R., Landgraf, J., Morino, I., Notholt, J., Petri, C., Pollard, D. F., Roche, S., Shiomi, K., Strong, K., Sussmann, R., Velazco, V. A., Warneke, T., and Wunch, D.:
A scientific algorithm to simultaneously retrieve carbon monoxide and methane from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6771–6802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6771-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6771-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, L., Zavala-Araiza, D., Gautam, R., Omara, M., Scarpelli, T., Sheng, J., Sulprizio, M. P., Zhuang, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Hamburg, S. P., and Jacob, D. J.:
Unravelling a large methane emission discrepancy in Mexico using satellite observations, Remote Sens. Environ., 260, 112461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112461</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, L., Gautam, R., Omara, M., Zavala-Araiza, D., Maasakkers, J., Scarpelli, T., Lorente, A., Lyon, D., Sheng, J., Varon, D., Nesser, H., Qu, Z., Lu, X., Sulprizio, M., Hamburg, S., and Jacob, D.:
Satellite quantification of oil and natural gas methane emissions in the US and Canada including contributions from individual basins, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-155</a>, in review, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Sierk, B., Bézy, J.-L., Löscher, A., and Meijer, Y.:
The European CO<sub>2</sub> Monitoring Mission: observing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from space, in: Proc. SPIE 11180, International Conference on Space Optics – ICSO 2018, 111800M (12 July 2019), Chania, Greece, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2535941" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2535941</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Stanevich, I., Jones, D. B. A., Strong, K., Parker, R. J., Boesch, H., Wunch, D., Notholt, J., Petri, C., Warneke, T., Sussmann, R., Schneider, M., Hase, F., Kivi, R., Deutscher, N. M., Velazco, V. A., Walker, K. A., and Deng, F.:
Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 of GEOS-Chem and v35j of its adjoint model, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3839–3862, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, A. J. and Jacob, D. J.:
Balancing aggregation and smoothing errors in inverse models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7039–7048, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7039-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7039-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, A. J., Jacob, D. J., Wecht, K. J., Maasakkers, J. D., Lundgren, E., Andrews, A. E., Biraud, S. C., Boesch, H., Bowman, K. W., Deutscher, N. M., Dubey, M. K., Griffith, D. W. T., Hase, F., Kuze, A., Notholt, J., Ohyama, H., Parker, R., Payne, V. H., Sussmann, R., Sweeney, C., Velazco, V. A., Warneke, T., Wennberg, P. O., and Wunch, D.:
Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7049–7069, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7049-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7049-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Varon, D. J., Estrada, L. A., Sulprizio, M., and Jacob, D. J.: Integrated Methane Inversion Website, IMI [code], <a href="https://imi.seas.harvard.edu/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 18 July 2022), 2022a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Varon, D. J., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Nesser, H., Gautam, R., Omara, M., Hmiel, B., Lyon, D., Delgado, A. L., Maasakkers, J., and Aben, I.:
Continuous weekly monitoring of methane emissions from the Permian Basin by inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations (2A.2), American Meteorological Society 102nd annual meeting, 24 January 2022, Houston, Texas, January 2022b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Varon, D. J., Laestrada, W. D., and Jiawei, Z.​​​​​​​: geoschem/integrated_methane_inversion: imi 1.0.0-beta.2 release (imi-1.0.0-beta.2), Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6578547" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6578547</a>, 2022c.​​​​​​​
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wecht, K. J., Jacob, D. J., Frankenberg, C., Jiang, Z., and Blake, D. R.:
Mapping of North America methane emissions with high spatial resolution by inversion of SCIAMACHY satellite data, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 7741–7756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021551</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Wofsy, S. C. and Hamburg, S.:
MethaneSAT – A new observing platform for high resolution measurements of methane and carbon dioxide, AGU Fall Meeting 2019, A53F–02, 13 December 2019, San Francisco, California, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wunch, D., Toon, G. C., Blavier, J.-F. L., Washenfelder, R. A., Notholt, J., Connor, B. J., Griffith, D. W. T., Sherlock, V., and Wennberg, P. O.:
The Total Carbon Column Observing Network, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 369, 2087–2112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0240" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0240</a>, 2011a.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., Toon, G. C., Connor, B. J., Fisher, B., Osterman, G. B., Frankenberg, C., Mandrake, L., O'Dell, C., Ahonen, P., Biraud, S. C., Castano, R., Cressie, N., Crisp, D., Deutscher, N. M., Eldering, A., Fisher, M. L., Griffith, D. W. T., Gunson, M., Heikkinen, P., Keppel-Aleks, G., Kyrö, E., Lindenmaier, R., Macatangay, R., Mendonca, J., Messerschmidt, J., Miller, C. E., Morino, I., Notholt, J., Oyafuso, F. A., Rettinger, M., Robinson, J., Roehl, C. M., Salawitch, R. J., Sherlock, V., Strong, K., Sussmann, R., Tanaka, T., Thompson, D. R., Uchino, O., Warneke, T., and Wofsy, S. C.:
A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of CO<sub>2</sub> total columns from space, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12317–12337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12317-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12317-2011</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, C., Huang, Q., Li, Z., Liu, K., and Hu, F.:
Big Data and cloud computing: innovation opportunities and challenges, Int. J. Digit. Earth, 10, 13–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1239771" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1239771</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, X., Millet, D. B., and Henze, D. K.:
How well can inverse analyses of high-resolution satellite data resolve heterogeneous methane fluxes? Observing system simulation experiments with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (v35), Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7775–7793, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Liu, L., Zhao, Y., Gong, S., Zhang, X., Henze, D. K., Capps, S. L., Fu, T.-M., Zhang, Q., and Wang, Y.:
Source attribution of particulate matter pollution over North China with the adjoint method, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 084011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084011</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Gautam, R., Pandey, S., Omara, M., Maasakkers, J. D., Sadavarte, P., Lyon, D., Nesser, H., Sulprizio, M. P., Varon, D. J., Zhang, R., Houweling, S., Zavala-Araiza, D., Alvarez, R. A., Lorente, A., Hamburg, S. P., Aben, I., and Jacob, D. J.:
Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space, Sci. Adv., 6, 17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5120</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Jacob, D. J., Lu, X., Maasakkers, J. D., Scarpelli, T. R., Sheng, J.-X., Shen, L., Qu, Z., Sulprizio, M. P., Chang, J., Bloom, A. A., Ma, S., Worden, J., Parker, R. J., and Boesch, H.:
Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3643–3666, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Zhuang, J., Jacob, D. J., Gaya, J. F., Yantosca, R. M., Lundgren, E. W., Sulprizio, M. P., and Eastham, S. D.:
Enabling immediate access to Earth science models through cloud computing: application to the GEOS-Chem model, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1943–1960, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-18-0243.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-18-0243.1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zhuang, J., Jacob, D. J., Lin, H., Lundgren, E. W., Yantosca, R. M., Flo Gaya, J., Sulprizio, M. P., and Eastham, S. D.:
Enabling High-Performance Cloud Computing for Earth Science Modeling on Over a Thousand Cores: Application to the GEOS-Chem Atmospheric Chemistry Model, J. Adv. Model Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002064</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
