<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Development and technical paper}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-15-4239-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Assessing the roles emission sources and atmospheric processes play in
simulating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
using CMAQ (version 5.2.1) and SMOKE (version 4.6)</article-title><alt-title>Roles of emission sources and atmospheric processes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N simulations</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Roles of emission sources and atmospheric processes in $\delta^{{15}}$N simulations}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H. Fang and G. Michalski}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Huan</given-names></name>
          <email>fang63@purdue.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9537-6278</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Michalski</surname><given-names>Greg</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4032-3931</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Purdue
University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West
Lafayette, IN 47907, United States</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Huan Fang (fang63@purdue.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>4239</fpage><lpage>4258</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>May</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Huan Fang</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e142">Nitrogen oxides (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nitric oxide (NO) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nitrogen dioxide
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)) are important trace gases that affect atmospheric chemistry, air
quality, and climate. Contemporary development of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
inventories is limited by the understanding of the roles of vegetation (net
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source or net sink), vehicle emissions from gasoline- and
diesel-powered vehicles, the application of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission control
technologies, and accurate verification techniques. The nitrogen stable
isotope composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N) of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is an effective tool to
evaluate the accuracy of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission inventories, which are based
on different assumptions. In this study, we traced the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along the “journey” of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
driven by atmospheric processes after different sources emit NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the
atmosphere. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N was incorporated into the emission input dataset,
generated from the US EPA trace gas emission model SMOKE (Sparse Matrix
Operator Kernel Emissions). Then the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-incorporated emission input
dataset was used to run the CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) modeling
system. By enhancing NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition, we simulated the expected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming no isotope fractionation during
chemical conversion or deposition. The simulated spatiotemporal patterns in
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic composition for both SMOKE outputs (simulations under
the “emission only” scenario) and CMAQ outputs (simulations under the “emission
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss” scenario) were compared with
corresponding measurements in West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. The simulations
under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario were
also compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at NADP (National
Atmospheric Deposition Program) sites. The results indicate the potential
underestimation of emissions from soil, livestock waste, off-road vehicles,
and natural-gas power plants and the potential overestimation of emissions
from on-road vehicles and coal-fired power plants, if only considering the
difference in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic composition for different emission sources.
After considering the mixing, dispersion, transport, and deposition of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from different sources, the estimation of atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) shows better agreement (by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 ‰) with observations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e454">Nitrogen oxides (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) are important trace gases
that affect atmospheric chemistry, air quality, and climate. The main
sources of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are anthropogenic emissions from vehicles,
power plants, agriculture, livestock waste, as well as natural emissions
from lightning and the by-product of nitrification and denitrification
occurring in soil (Galloway et al., 2004). The NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photochemical cycle
generates OH and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, organic peroxy radicals (RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), which ultimately oxidize NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HONO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
other N oxides). During the photochemical processes that convert NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, ground-level concentrations of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> become elevated, and
secondary particles are generated (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006). Secondary
aerosols are hazardous to human health (Lighty et al., 2000) and affect
cloud physics, enhancing the reflection of solar radiation (Schwartz, 1996).
Thus, the importance of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in air quality, climate, and human and
environmental health makes understanding the spatial and temporal variation
in the sources of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> a vital scientific question.</p>
      <p id="d1e676">Despite years of research, however, there are still several significant
uncertainties in the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget. About 15 %–40 % of global NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions, ranging from 4 to 15 Tg N yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, is derived from global soil
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, yet evaluating and verifying emission rates using
laboratory measurements, field measurements, and satellite observations is still a
challenge (Jaegleì et al., 2005; Yan et al., 2005; Stehfest and
Bouwman, 2006; Vinken et al., 2014; Rasool et al., 2016). Soil NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions vary by different biome types, meteorological conditions, N
fertilizer application, and soil physicochemical properties (Ludwig et al.,
2001). Furthermore, the role of vegetation is to act as a net source of
atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> when ambient NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is below the
“compensation point” versus acting as a net sink of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
when ambient NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are above it (Johansson, 1987; Thoene et al., 1996; Slovik et al., 1996; Weber and Rennenberg,
1996). This significantly impacts the biotic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission inventory
(Almaraz et al., 2018). Uncertainties also exist in the amount of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emitted during the combustion of fossil fuels by vehicles and industry.
According to Parrish (2006), the estimation of on-road vehicle NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission has at least 10 % to 15 % uncertainty. For the mileage-based
algorithm, which is used in the National Emission Inventory (NEI), the
uncertainty is caused by the limited number of sites to determine the
emission factors of vehicle classifications and emission types (Ingalls,
1989; Pierson et al., 1990; Fujita et al., 1992; Pierson et al., 1996;
Singer and Harley, 1996). The uncertainty in power plant NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
results from the choice of emission control technologies, of which the
removal efficiencies of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission are different. NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> removal by
low NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burning, over-fire air reduction, and selective non-catalytic
reduction is highly variable, ranging from 50 % to 75 % (Srivastava et al.,
2005).</p>
      <p id="d1e828">The nitrogen stable isotope composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N) of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> might be a useful tool
to help resolve the uncertainties of how NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources vary in
space and time because NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources have distinctive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N
ratios (Ammann et al., 1999; Felix et al., 2012; Felix and Elliott, 2013;
Fibiger et al., 2014; Heaton, 1987; Hoering, 1957; Miller et al., 2017;
Walters et al., 2015a, b, 2018). This variability in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N ratios is quantified by
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measurement of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N in atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared with the ratios in air
N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.0036 (for brevity, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value of any NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
compound will be denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Previous research has shown that there are unique
differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from different emission
sources and significant variations within each source (Fig. 1). This
uniqueness can potentially be used to partition the relative importance of
various NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources in a mixed atmosphere. For example, Redling et al.
(2013) found higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in samples collected
closer to the highway compared to those adjacent to a forest, showing the
emissions from vehicles were dominant near the highway. A strong positive
correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
from coal-fired power plants within 400 km radial area of study sites of
deposition suggests local power plant NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions impacted regional
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets (Elliott et al., 2007, 2009). What is lacking is a
systematic way of evaluating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in numerous
studies in the context of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources, regional emissions, meteorology,
and atmospheric chemistry (Elliott et al., 2009; Garten, 1992; Hall et al.,
2016; Occhipinti, 2008; Russell et al., 1998).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1318">Box (lower quartile, median, upper quartile) and whisker (lower
extreme, upper extreme) plot of the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values
for various NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1347">Here we have simulated the emission of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>and its mixing in
the atmosphere and compared the predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values to observations. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values are impacted by three main factors. The first is the inherent
variability of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in time and space.
Secondly, atmospheric processes mix the emitted NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, dispersing
multiple emission sources within a mixing lifetime relative to the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
chemical lifetime (2–7 h), which depends on its concentration and
photooxidation chemistry, that also vary in time and by location (Laughner
and Cohen, 2019). And thirdly, isotope effects occurring during
tropospheric photochemistry may alter the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
as they are transformed from NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this paper, we
consider the effects from the first and second considerations, the temporal
and spatial variation in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission, and the impacts from atmospheric
transport and deposition processes (source and mixing hypothesis). We
accomplish this by incorporating an input dataset of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N emissions used
in simulations by the CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) modeling
system. In a previous paper we have discussed the impacts of tropospheric
photochemistry by incorporating a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N chemical mechanism (Fang et al.,
2021) into CMAQ. The ultimate goal is to evaluate the accuracy of the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission inventory using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Incorporating ${}^{{15}}$N into NO${}_{{x}}$ emission datasets}?><title>Incorporating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N into NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission datasets</title>
      <p id="d1e1580">The EPA trace pollutant emission model SMOKE (Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel
Emissions) was used to simulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were estimated using the SMOKE model
based on the 2002 NEI (National Emission Inventory; United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2014), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N emissions were determined using these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and
the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources from previous
research (Table 1). Using the definition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
(‰), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted by each SMOKE processing
category (area, biogenic, mobile, and point) was calculated by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M155" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for each category
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) obtained from NEI and SMOKE, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>R<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N
emission factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) calculated by
rearranging Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M168" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0036</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value of some NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
source (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> area, biogenic, mobile, and point).</p>
      <p id="d1e2018">Annual NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for 2002 were obtained from the NEI at the
county level and were converted into hourly emissions on a 12 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 km
grid as previously published (Spak et al., 2007). The
modeling domain includes latitudes between 37 and 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and longitudes between 98<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and
78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, which fully covers the Midwestern US (Fig. 2, in
yellow). SMOKE categorizes NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions into four “processing
categories”: biogenic, mobile, point, and area (Table 1). The choice of the
2002 version of NEI is, in part, arbitrary. However, to compare the model-predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values with observations, it requires the
emission inventory to be relevant to the same timeframe as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N measurements of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The datasets we compare to the
model (discussed below) span from 2002 to 2009; thus the 2002 inventory is
more relevant than later inventories (2014 onward). The county-level annual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission for the Midwestern US from NEI was converted to the
dataset with hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2144">The full geographic domain (yellow) and extracted domain (light
grayish purple) for the study.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2157">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values (in ‰) for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources based on SMOKE processing category and NEI sector.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SMOKE category</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NEI sector</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰) – this study</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biogenic</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Soil</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>59.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34.3 (Felix and Elliott, 2014)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2">Area</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Livestock waste</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.8 (Felix and Elliott, 2014)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Off-road gasoline</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.1 to 8.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.5 (Walters et al., 2015b)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Off-road diesel</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.5 (Walters et al., 2015b)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Mobile</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">On-road gasoline</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.1 to 17</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 (Walters et al., 2015b)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">On-road diesel</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.5 (Walters et al., 2015b)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">Point</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coal-fired fossil fuel combustion</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.7 to 25.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 (Felix et al., 2012)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Natural-gas fossil fuel combustion</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.5 (Walters et al., 2015b)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Biogenic ${}^{{15}}$NO${}_{{x}}$ emissions}?><title>Biogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e2466">The NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the soil (biogenic) was modeled in SMOKE using
standard techniques (details in the Supplement), and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of
biogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were taken from previous studies. Li and Wang (2008)
measured the NO fluxes using dynamic flow chambers for 2 to 13 d after
cropland soil was fertilized by either urea (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or ammonium bicarbonate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>48.9 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.8 ‰. Felix and
Elliott (2014) used passive samplers to collect NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in a cornfield for
20 d, with low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30.8 ‰) and high
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.5 ‰) fertilizer application. Using active samplers,
Miller et al. (2018) collected NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between May and June, finding
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44.2 ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.0 ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); Yu and Elliott (2017) measured
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>59.8 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.4 ‰ in 15 samples from
soil plots in a fallow field 2 weeks after the precipitation. Based on these
studies, we adopted an average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
from the soil of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34.3 ‰ (Li and Wang, 2008; Felix and
Elliott, 2014; Yu and Elliott, 2017; Miller et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Mobile ${}^{{15}}$NO${}_{{x}}$ emissions}?><title>Mobile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e2696">The SMOKE NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from on-road vehicles used standard methods
(details in the Supplement) and used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values from prior studies. We
have excluded studies that infer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by measuring
plant proxies or passive sampling in the environment (Ammann et al., 1999;
Pearson et al., 2000; Savard et al., 2009; Redling et al., 2013; Felix and
Elliott, 2014). This is because equilibrium and kinetic isotope effects
occur as NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts in the atmosphere to form NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, prior to
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition. In addition, the role vegetation plays in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
removal and atmospheric processes that mix emitted NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the surroundings
can also alter the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Instead, we estimated the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from vehicles only using studies that
directly measured tailpipe NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. Moore (1977) and Heaton
(1990) collected tailpipe NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spanning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 ‰ to
2 ‰, with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.7 ‰. Neither Heaton nor Moore noted whether these six vehicles were equipped with any catalytic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction technology, but
it is unlikely since late 1970 and 1980s vehicles were seldom equipped
with catalytic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction technology. Fibiger (2014) measured five
samples of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from diesel engines without SCR (selective catalytic reduction) emitted into a smog
chamber; the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.2 ‰
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.7 ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.97 ‰). The most
comprehensive studies on vehicle NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values are by
Walters et al. (2015a, b), who measured gas and diesel vehicles
separately, including those with and without three-way catalytic converter
(TCC) and SCR technology. They also measured on-road and off-road vehicles
separately. The measurements showed that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emitted by on-road diesel vehicles ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 ‰ to
0 ‰, so the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.5 ‰ was
adopted. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values emitted by on-road gasoline
vehicles are a function of vehicle travel times, ranging from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 ‰ to 1.8 ‰, with an average of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 ‰ for the Midwest region. This value is
close to the measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 ‰, average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 ‰) of
Miller et al. (2017), who collected NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along highways in Pennsylvania
and Ohio.</p>
      <p id="d1e3055">The emission rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the mobile source was determined
by Eq. (4) grid by grid, according to the contributions from on-road gasoline
vehicles and on-road diesel vehicles, as well as their corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values. NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from off-road vehicles are regarded as
area sources in SMOKE, which were processed over each county. In contrast,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from on-road vehicles are regarded as the mobile source
in SMOKE, which will be processed along each highway. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
of on-road gasoline vehicles was based on the average of the vehicle travel
time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) within each region with the same zip code (Walters et al., 2015b).<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M280" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>mobile</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>on-road gas</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0036</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>on-road gas</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>on-road diesel</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0036</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>on-road  diesel</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>on-road gas</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.35</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.455</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>2.1.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Point source ${}^{{15}}$NO${}_{{x}}$ emissions}?><title>Point source <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e3353">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> point sources are large anthropogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitters located at
a fixed position such as EGUs (electric generating units). Fugitive dust
does not significantly contribute to point NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, so our
inventory focused only on power plants (Houyoux, 2005). Power plants were
separated into two different types: EGU and non-EGU (e.g. commercial and
industrial combustion). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted
from power plants have been estimated to vary from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.7 ‰ to 25.6 ‰ (Heaton, 1987, 1990; Snape et al., 2003; Felix et al., 2012; Walters et al., 2015b). We
have ignored studies that measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from EGUs (Felix et al., 2015; Savard et al., 2017) and
instead, only consider those studies that directly measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from stacks. Heaton (1990) collected five samples from the
different coal-fired power stations finding NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
6 ‰ to 13 ‰, with a standard
deviation of 2.9 ‰. Snape et al. (2003)  measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values from power plants using three different types of coals
values ranging from 2.1 ‰ to 7.2 ‰,
with a standard deviation of 1.37 ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The most
comprehensive study on coal-fired power plants NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values was by Felix
et al. (2012). They measured the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the
coal-fired power stations with and without different emission control
technologies. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions range from
9 ‰ to 25.6 ‰, with an average of
14.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.51 ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values varied when different emission control technologies were used:
ranging from 15.5 ‰ to 25.6 ‰, with an
average of 19.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.28 ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for SCR (selective catalytic reduction); ranging from
13.6 ‰ to 15.1 ‰, with an average
14.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79 ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for SNCR (selective noncatalytic reduction); ranging from
9.0 ‰ to 12.6 ‰, with an average
10.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.11 ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for OFA (over-fire air)/LNB (low NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burner); and ranging from
9.6 ‰ to 11.7 ‰, with an average
10.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79 ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for no emission control
technology. According to Xing et al. (2013), about half of the coal-fired
power plants in the United States are equipped with SCR. Thus, we assume
15 ‰ for the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from coal-fired power
plants, which is the average between SCR and other emission control
technologies.</p>
      <p id="d1e3692">The most comprehensive study on natural-gas-fired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values (Walters et al., 2015b) collected NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from a residential natural-gas low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> furnace and the stack of a natural-gas EGU. The measurement
showed that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted by natural-gas
power plants averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 ‰,
which we used for the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from natural-gas power plants. The
latitude, longitude, and point source characteristics (EGU and non-EGU,
coal-fired or natural-gas-fired, implementation of emission control
technology) of each power plant were obtained from the US Energy Information
Administration (2017). The power plants were assigned grids by their
latitudes and longitudes, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values were assigned to
these grids based on their emission characteristics, before determining the
emission rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from point sources using Eqs. (2) and (3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>2.1.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Area source ${}^{{15}}$NO${}_{{x}}$ emissions}?><title>Area source <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e3834">Area NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (details in the Supplement) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values were based on the
assumption that livestock waste and off-road vehicles (utility vehicles for
agricultural and residential purposes) accounted for total area sources.
Livestock waste <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values were taken from Felix and
Elliott (2014) since it is currently the only study on livestock waste
emissions. They placed a passive sampler with ventilation fans in an
open-air and closed room in barns of cows and turkeys, respectively. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from these measurements range from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.5 ‰. Among these samples,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from turkey waste averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.5 ‰, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from cow
waste averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.7 ‰. We used
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.8 ‰ as the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from livestock waste, which is the weighted average of the
turkey waste and cow waste emissions. We used Walters et al. (2015b) to
estimate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the off-road vehicles
since it is the latest in-depth study that measured the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> specifically from off-road vehicles that ranged from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.6 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.2 ‰ and averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 ‰. The measurement showed that the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted by diesel off-road vehicles
without SCR ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.1 ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.8 ‰, with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 ‰, and diesel-powered off-road vehicles with SCR
ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 ‰ to 8.5 ‰, with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 ‰. We adopted
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.5 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted
by diesel-powered off-road vehicles, which is the median between the
measurement of vehicles with and without SCR.</p>
      <p id="d1e4162">The emission rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from area sources was determined by Eq. (5) grid by grid, according to the contributions from waste, off-road gasoline
vehicles, and off-road diesel vehicles, as well as their corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values based on previous research.
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M372" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>area</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>waste</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0036</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>waste</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>off-road gas</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0036</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>off-road gas</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>off-road diesel</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0036</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>off-road diesel</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4395">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission data files of each SMOKE processing category
were incorporated into the final dataset based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
values from previous research (Table 1) and Eqs. (2)–(5).
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M376" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>area</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>biog</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>mobile</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>point</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>area</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>biog</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>mobile</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>point</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0036</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Simulating atmospheric $\delta^{{15}}$NO${}_{{x}}$ in CMAQ}?><title>Simulating atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in CMAQ</title>
      <p id="d1e4654">In order to investigate the role of mixing in the spatiotemporal
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values, CMAQ was used to simulate
the meteorological transport effects (advection, eddy diffusion, etc.). In
this “emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport” scenario, grid-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values emitted are dispersed as NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixes across the
regional scale. This dispersion will depend on grid emission strength and
mixing vigor and is effectively treating NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a conservative tracer.
The simulations used the 2002 National Emission Inventory (NEI), as well as
2002 and 2016 meteorological conditions respectively, to explore how
meteorological conditions will impact the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Simulations covering the full domain and extracted domain
were conducted to explore and eliminate potential bias near the domain
boundary.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Meteorology input dataset and boundary conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e4750">To explore the impact of atmospheric processes, the meteorology input
datasets for the years 2002 and 2016 were prepared and compared. The CMAQ
chemistry-transport model (CCTM) used the NARR (North American Regional Reanalysis) and NAM (North
American Mesoscale Forecast System) to convert the weather observations
(every 3 h for NARR, every 6 h for NAM analyses) into gridded
meteorological elements, such as temperature, wind field, and precipitation,
with the horizontal resolution of 12 km and 34 vertical layers, with the
thickness increasing with height from 50 m near the surface to 600 m near
the 50 mb pressure level. These were used to generate the gridded
meteorology files on an hourly basis, using the Weather Research and
Forecasting (WRF) model. To maintain consistency between the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission dataset and the meteorology, the same coordinate system, spatial
domain, and grid size used in the SMOKE model were used in the WRF
simulation. The WRF outputs were used to prepare the CMAQ-ready meteorology
input dataset using CMAQ's MCIP (the Meteorology-Chemistry Interface
Processor; see the Supplement for details). In these emission-only simulations, the
deposition of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was effectively set to zero. This was accomplished by
defining YO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO and YO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (in addition to ZO
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO and ZO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and setting their deposition
velocities to 0.001 (setting them to zero collapses the simulation). The
meteorological fields generated by MCIP were used as inputs for the Initial
Conditions Processor (ICON) and Boundary Conditions Processor (BCON) to run
CCTM in CMAQ. The ICON program prepares the initial chemical/isotopic
concentrations in each of the 3D grid cells for use in the initial time step
of the CCTM simulation. The BCON program prepares the chemical/isotopic
boundary condition throughout the CCTM simulation. The CMAQ default ICON and
BCON for a clean atmosphere were used, which had NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 ppb. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values were added to the outputs of ICON and BCON, with
the concentration equal to 0.0036[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>], which assumes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 at the initial time step and outside the domain of the
simulation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The role of deposition and chemical transformation of NO${}_{{x}}$}?><title>The role of deposition and chemical transformation of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e4930">CMAQ simulated how NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> removal by photochemical oxidation and
deposition alters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during mixing, transport, and
dispersion. This “apparent” conversion of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
implemented by enhancing NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dry deposition by first magnifying it to
20 times the normal level (14 kg ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and testing for the change in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration relative to the normal deposition rate. Multiple tuning trials
were conducted until the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding time (lifetime) of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
atmosphere across the domain averaged about 1 d. This is a typical average
photochemical NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime for a combination of urban, suburban, and
rural environments (Laughner and Cohen, 2019). This approach is limited
since NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime varies depending on oxidation capacity, with urban
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetimes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–11 h) being significantly shorter
than in rural conditions (Fang et al., 2021). In these simulations, the
molecular mass of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was set equal (14) to ensure no isotope effect
was induced by dry deposition, since the equations for dry deposition have a
mass term in the diffusion coefficient calculation. These “emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss” simulations are an attempt to show
how “lifetime chemistry” alters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values by
removing NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> before it can be transported along significant distances.
For example, in an emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport scenario, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from a high
emission power plant could travel across the domain, altering regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as it mixes with other grids. In contrast, in the
emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario, most of that
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> would be removed near the power plant, effectively constricting its
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N influence. This has an added advantage in that the
deposited <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> should be similar to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is not being generated in this model. We
emphasize that in this model the isotope effects associated with the
photochemical transformation of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (and other higher N
oxides) and deposition are ignored and will be addressed in a forthcoming
paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>The simulation over the extracted domain</title>
      <p id="d1e5293">As mentioned in Sect. 2.2.1, atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for initial conditions and boundary conditions. As a
result, a bias may occur along the boundary of the research area and mainly
occurs under the following two circumstances – firstly, when the air mass
is transported out of the research area (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). Due to the lack of the
emission dataset, Canada is considered an “emission-free zone” for this
research. As a result, the atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is diluted, which impacts
its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values, especially for that  with extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>15 ‰ or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5‰). Secondly, the air
mass with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is transported from the emission-free
zone into the research area (Fig. S2), and the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is flattened. Therefore, to avoid the bias near the border,
the extracted domain that only covers Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, and Kentucky
was determined (Fig. 2, in light purple), where the measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values at NADP (National
Atmospheric Deposition Program) sites are available (Mase, 2010; Riha, 2013). The
boundary condition for the simulation over the extracted domain is based on
the CCTM output of the full-domain simulation (BCON code available on
<uri>http://www.zenodo.org</uri> (last access: 8 December 2020) (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311986" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4311986</ext-link>, Fang, 2020b).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Simulated spatial variability of NO${}_{{x}}$ emission rates}?><title>Simulated spatial variability of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission rates</title>
      <p id="d1e5482">We first examine the spatial heterogeneity of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission rate for
a single time period to illustrate the overall pattern of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
over the domain (Fig. 3). This is because the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission is determined by the fraction of each NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source (Eq. 6),
which in turn is a function of their emission rates. Since our NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions are gridded by SMOKE using the NEI, they are, by definition,
correct with respect to the NEI. However, a brief discussion of the salient
geographic distribution of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and comparisons with other
studies is warranted for completeness and as a backdrop for the discussion
of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions and resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values. We have
arbitrarily chosen to sum the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions during the April to June
time period for this discussion (Fig. 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e5582">Total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission in the Midwest between April and June in tonnes of nitrogen per day (t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). High NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are associated with major urban areas
such as Chicago, Detroit, Minneapolis-St Paul, Kansas City, St. Louis,
Indianapolis, and Louisville.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5621">The April to June NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions ranged from less than 0.01 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
to more than 15 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the seasonal grid average of 0.904 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This average agrees well with estimates in previous studies for the
United States, which were between 0.81 and 1.02 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dignon and
Hameed, 1989; Farrell et al., 1999; Selden et al., 1999; Xing et al., 2012).
Within 75 % of the geographic domain, the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are
relatively low, ranging from between 0 and 0.5 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3).
Geographically, these grids are in rural areas some distance away from
metropolitan areas and highways (Fig. 3). NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions within about
20 % of the grids are relatively moderate, ranging between 0.5 and 2.0 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3). Geographically, these grids are mainly located along major
highways and areas with medium population densities (Fig. 3). Urban centers
comprise about 5 % of the grids within the geographic domain, and these
have high NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions rates, ranging between 2.0 and 15.0 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. S3). The metropolitan area's average is 5.03 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
nearly 14 times the average emission rate over the rest of the grids
within the geographic domain (0.37 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to the high vehicle
density associated with high population. The highest emission rates are
located within large cities as well as the edge of the east coast
metropolitan area (Fig. 3). Summing the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions among the grids
that encompass these major midwestern cities yields city-level NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission rates that vary from 61.2 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Louisville, KY) to 634.1 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chicago, IL). These city-level NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission rates (Table S4)
agree well with estimates derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (Lu
et al., 2015). Grids containing power plants are significant NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
hotspots within the geographic domain. These account for less than 1 % of
the grids, but the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from a single grid that contains a
power plant can be as high as 93.4 t N d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Geographically, the power
plants are mainly located along the Ohio River valley, near other water
bodies, and often close to metropolitan areas (Fig. 3). The NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission rates of the major power plants within the Midwest simulated by
SMOKE (Table S5) match well with the measurement from the Continuous
Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) (de Foy et al., 2015; Duncan et al., 2013;
Kim et al., 2009). The geographic distribution of grid-level annual NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission density in our simulation also agrees with the county-level annual
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission density discussed in the 2002 NEI booklet (Fig. S4; United States Environmental Protection Agency,
2018b).</p>
      <p id="d1e5881">We next examine the spatial heterogeneity of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source fractions
(Fig. 4) for the same time period (April to June). The NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is defined as the amount of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from a source category (s)
normalized to total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(source) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(total)).
The fraction for anthropogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission is defined as the amount of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from a source category normalized to the sum of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
from anthropogenic sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(source) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(total)-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(biogenic))) Since the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined by the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission fractions within
each grid, it is important to understand where in the domain these fractions
differ and why. The area sources, which mainly consist of off-road vehicles,
agriculture production, residential combustion, and industrial
processes, which are individually too low in magnitude to report as point
sources, are fairly uniform in their distribution across the domain.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e6073">The geographical distribution of the fraction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
from each SMOKE processing category (area, biogenic, mobile, and point) over
each grid throughout the Midwest between April and June based on NEI 2002.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6091">The SMOKE simulation shows that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies significantly across the
domain. The average area NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">area</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was 0.271
for total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission and 0.290 for anthropogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
within the Midwest from April to June. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">area</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values show a clear spatial
variation and range from 0.125 to 0.5 over about 75 % of the grids (Fig. S5). Geographically, the grids with relatively higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">area</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are in the
rural area away from highways, where agriculture is the most common land
use classification. In the states of Wisconsin and Missouri, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">area</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is slightly lower due to the higher fraction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
from biogenic sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">biog</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the states of Pennsylvania and
Michigan, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">area</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is slightly lower due to the higher fraction of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from mobile sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mobile</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In addition, the grids
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">area</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 0.75 are mainly located along the Mississippi
River and Ohio River, due to wastewater discharge. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bio</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a
clear spatial variation and is highest in the western portion of the domain
(Fig. 4). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bio</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from April to June is less than 0.5 in more than
90 % of the grids within the geographic domain, with the average of 0.065
(Fig. S5). Geographically, the grids with relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bio</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
located in the western regions of the Midwest, away from cities and highway
where the density of agricultural acreage and natural vegetation is high.
Furthermore, the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bio</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values occur in the megacities and along
the highways, which agrees well with the land use related to the biogenic
emission. The April to June SMOKE simulation shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mobile</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.325
for total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission and 0.347 for anthropogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mobile</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a clear spatial variation, with relatively higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mobile</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> located in major metropolitan regions and along the
highways, where vehicles have the highest density. The value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mobile</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the geographic domain distributes evenly on the histogram
(Fig. S5). Based on the SMOKE simulation, the fraction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
from point sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">point</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is 0.339 for total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission and
0.363 for anthropogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">point</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are obviously highest in
grids where the power plants are located, mainly along the Ohio River valley
and near other water bodies close to metropolitan areas. The point sources
occupy only 4 % of the domain grids, and about one-quarter of the power plants are
not on the same grids as highways; thus these grids have a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">point</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.9 NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Simulated spatial variability in $\delta^{{15}}$NO${}_{{x}}$}?><title>Simulated spatial variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e6450">Using these NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission source fractions, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values were simulated, and the spatial heterogeneity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for a single time period is discussed. The “emission
only” simulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values (at 06:00 UTC on 26 July)
ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34.3 ‰ to 14.9 ‰ (Fig. 5a). The majority of the grids have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values lower
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.3 ‰, which is due to biogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34.3‰) in sparsely populated areas where
intensive agriculture dominates the land use (Fig. 5a). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for grids containing big cities mainly ranged
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.75 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 ‰ due to the
higher fraction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from on-road vehicles
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7‰). Similarly, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for grids ranging  between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.75 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 ‰ resolve major highways. The highest
value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N occurs at the grids, where the coal-fired EGUs
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15‰) and hybrid-fired EGUs are the dominant
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source (Fig. 5a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e6689">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission (<bold>a</bold> emission only scenario) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
based on NEI 2002 and 2016 meteorology (<bold>b</bold> emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport
scenario), at 06:00 UTC on 26 July, are presented by color in each grid. The
warmer the color, the higher the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of atmospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The feature of the transport inside the white box is shown in
Fig. 6.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6772">The effect of atmospheric mixing on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial
distribution was then taken into account by coupling the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions to the meteorology simulation. There are significant differences
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the emission only (Fig. 5a)
and the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport (Fig. 5b) simulations. While emission only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N pattern shows biogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
dominating the spatial domain, anthropogenic emissions become dominant over
most of the grids in the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport simulations, especially
for the grids located around major cities and power plants. In general, as
isotopically heavier urban NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disperses, the grid average increases
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.2 ‰ under the emission only scenario to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.5 ‰ under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport scenario.
Similarly, the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted along major highways is transported to the
surrounding grids, so that the atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the grids around the
major highways becomes isotopically heavier relative to the emission only scenario. We define <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transport</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N difference between emission only and emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
transport scenarios. An example of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transport</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> effect can be seen in grids encompassing a plume
emanating from southern Illinois' Baldwin Energy Complex (marked with a
transparent white box in Fig. 5b) that uses subbituminous coal and
bituminous coal as its major energy source. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transport</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the regions is altered as a function of distance
away from the EGU. In this time snapshot (06:00 UTC on 26 July), the
northeastwards-propagating plume of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the EGU creates
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over 135 km away (Fig. 6).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e7035">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transport</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along the plume
(colored in dark red to orange inside the white box in Fig. 5b) over the
distance from the Baldwin Energy Complex power plant (located at
the southwestern border of Illinois).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e7068">The geographical distribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value of
total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in each season (winter: January–March; spring: April–June;
summer: July–September; fall: October–December) in per mil (‰)
throughout the Midwest simulated by SMOKE, based on NEI 2002.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Seasonal variation in $\delta^{{15}}$NO${}_{{x}}$}?><title>Seasonal variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e7125">We next examine the temporal heterogeneity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values over the domain for emission only and interpret them in terms of
changes in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission fractions as a function of time. The predicted
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value for total emissions in the Midwest during
each season shows a significant temporal variation (Fig. 7). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 ‰ to
15 ‰, with the annual average over the Midwest at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.15 ‰. The maps for different seasons show the obvious
changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values over western regions of the Midwest,
going from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 ‰ in the spring to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 ‰ in the summer. In order to qualitatively analyze
the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> among each season, the values over
the grids (Fig. 7) were organized into histograms (Fig. S6). The grids
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 ‰ and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 ‰ increase dramatically from less than 10 % during
fall (October–December) and winter (January–March) to more than 20 % during spring
(April–June) and summer (July–September). The grids with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 ‰ decrease from
around 90 % during fall and winter to around 75 % during spring and
summer. The significant temporal variation in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
during different seasons can be quantitatively explained by changing
fractions of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the biogenic source in any grid (Fig. S7) using Eq. (6). Unlike other NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources, the fraction of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from biogenic sources changes significantly among each
season within the geographic domain, especially over the rural areas (Fig. S7).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e7391">The geographical distribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value of
atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in each season (winter: January–March; spring: April–June;
summer: July–September; fall: October–December) in per mil (‰)
throughout the Midwest (with zoomed-in view focusing on Indiana), simulated by
CMAQ, based on NEI 2002 and 2016 meteorology.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e7420">To qualitatively analyze the changes in the fraction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
from biogenic sources among each season, the distributions of the fractions
among the same cutoffs as the maps in Fig. S7 were shown in the histograms
(Fig. S8). In general, the distribution of the fraction shifts to higher
values during spring (April–June) and summer (July–September), indicating the increase
of biogenic emissions. During this period, the surface sunlight hours,
temperature, and precipitation are relatively higher, and as a result, the
canopy coverage of the plants becomes higher, which leads to the increase of
the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from biogenic sources (Pierce, 2001; Vukovich and
Pierce, 2002; Schwede et al., 2005; Pouliot and Pierce, 2009; United States Environmental Protection Agency,
2018a). Besides this, the fertilizer application during this period also
increases soil NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Li and Wang, 2008; Felix and Elliott,
2014). As a result, the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shifts to
lower values during these periods (Fig. 7). The percentage of the grids with
the fraction of biogenic emission less than 0.125 decreases dramatically
from more than 50 % during fall (October–December) and winter (January–March) to less
than 35 % during spring (April–June) and summer (July–September). As the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission from biogenic source becomes dominant, the percentage of the grids
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 ‰ and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 ‰ increases, while the percentage of the grids with
values between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 ‰
decreases, which sufficiently explains the trends shown in Fig. 7.</p>
      <p id="d1e7530">The temporal variation in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is also
controlled by the propagation of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, which varies
seasonally. The temporal heterogeneity of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport scenario is
interpreted in terms of changes in the propagation of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission as a
function of time. The predicted seasonal average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the Midwest shows significant variations (Fig. 8). On an annual basis, the
emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.10 ‰, which is similar to the emission only
average range, but the range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.2 ‰ to
11.6‰) was narrower due to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> transport and
mixing. The maps for different seasons show the obvious changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values over western regions of the Midwest, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.75 ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 ‰ in fall and winter to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.25 ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.5 ‰ in spring and summer. The spatial heterogeneity
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport
scenario (Fig. 8) was compared to that under the emission only scenario
(Fig. 7). The difference was defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transport</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S9) and had values that ranged from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.9 ‰ to 31.2 ‰, with an average of
4.9 ‰. The grids with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transport</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 ‰ and
0 ‰ are the urban areas and decrease slightly from about
11 % during fall (October–December) and winter (January–March) to 10 % during spring
(April–June) and summer (July–September). The grids with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transport</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0 ‰ and
5 ‰ are typically in the rural areas that are impacted by
the urban NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and decrease dramatically from more than 50 %
during fall and winter to less than 40 % during spring and summer. The
grids with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transport</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than
5 ‰ are in the rural areas obviously impacted by the
urban NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission and increase dramatically from less than 40 %
during fall and winter to more than 50 % during spring and summer.
Therefore, the impacts from transport and mixing are more obvious during
spring and summer (Fig. S10).</p>
      <p id="d1e7859">The planetary boundary layer (PBL) height is an effective indicator showing whether the pollutants are
under synoptic conditions which are favorable for the dispersion, mixing,
and transport after being emitted into the atmosphere (Oke, 2002; Shu et
al., 2017; Liao et al., 2018; Miao et al., 2019). Comparing the
distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transport</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig. S9) with
the corresponding PBL height (Fig. S11) for each season, the effects of PBL
height on the propagation of the air mass are clearly shown. NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emitted by power plants is much higher than the emission rates at the
surrounding grids and is a hotspot that impacts the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
values on the surrounding grids. As PBL increases, the emitted NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
power plant mixes more effectively with the surrounding grid; thus there are
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values along the power plant plume transect.
The PBL height changes significantly among each season within the geographic
domain, especially over Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa (Fig. S11). The PBL
height over these areas increases from less than 250 m above the ground
level to more than 625 m a.g.l., during spring and
summer, which creates a more favorable synoptic condition for the
dispersion, mixing, and transport of the pollutants after being emitted into
the atmosphere. As a result, the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values
shifts to higher values, showing the stronger effect of atmospheric
processes during spring and summer. In order to qualitatively analyze how
PBL height affects the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along power plant plumes,
the domain average PBL height for each month was plotted against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9a). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values along the
power plants' plumes and PBL heights over the domain have the same seasonal
trend. Interestingly, the “turning point” of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values
is about 1 month later than the turning point of the PBL heights. The
scatter plot (Fig. 9b) shows a strong positive correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.85)
between the domain average PBL height and average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value
along the power plants' plumes. The positive correlation between PBL height
and propagation of air mass, indicated by the evolution of atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study, agrees well with the corresponding
measurement in megacities in China from previous studies (Shu et al.,
2017; Liu et al., 2018; Liao et al., 2018).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e8057">The time series plot <bold>(a)</bold> and the scatter plot <bold>(b)</bold> of the domain
average PBL height (m) and the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
(‰) value of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along the plumes of
power plants during each month throughout the Midwest simulated by CMAQ,
based on NEI 2002 and 2016 meteorology.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e8094">The difference between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
(‰) value of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> based on 2016
meteorology and 2002 meteorology (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2002</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2016</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
during each season (winter: January–March; spring: April–June; summer: July–September; fall:
October–December), throughout the Midwest, simulated by CMAQ.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>The simulations based on different meteorology input datasets</title>
      <p id="d1e8158">The spatial heterogeneity of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using 2016
meteorology input dataset was compared to that using 2002 meteorology (Fig. S13). Overall, the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using 2002 meteorology
has the similar geographic distribution and seasonal trend as the 2016
simulation. The difference was defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2002</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2016</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10) and had values that ranged between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.25 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.25 ‰ over most of the
grids. However, in the western part of the domain, where the biogenic
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission is dominant, the more positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2002</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2016</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values (up to 5 ‰) occur during summer
and fall. On the other hand, the more negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2002</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2016</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 ‰) occur along
the power plant plume during the same period. The spatial heterogeneity of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2002</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2016</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates how climate change alters
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. If we have enough input datasets to generate
and compare the seasonal/monthly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the past
20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> years, the impacts of anomalies in each meteorology variables could be
explored. For the current dataset, a similar comparison between the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the corresponding PBL height was conducted for
the simulation based on 2002 meteorology (Fig. S14) to show how PBL height
changes the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Under the 2002
meteorology, lower PBL height during the winter caused surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values along the power plants' plumes to be lower relative
to 2016 meteorology. On the other hand, due to the higher PBL height during spring and summer 2002, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values decreased through
July before ending with relatively higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values in
December. The scatter plot for the simulation based on 2002 meteorology
(Fig. S14b) also shows a strong positive correlation between the domain
average PBL height and average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value along the power
plants' plumes, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.78. The videos of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on an hourly basis throughout the years 2002 and 2016 are
available on <uri>http://www.zenodo.org</uri> (last access: 8 December 2021) (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311986" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4311986</ext-link>, Fang, 2020b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>The simulation over the extracted domain</title>
      <p id="d1e8534">Analysis of whether there was a difference between the extracted-domain
simulation (Fig. 2) and full-domain simulation was conducted by defining
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>extracted-full</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and assessing the bias due to
the motion of the air mass across the domain boundary (Fig. S17). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>extracted-full</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranged between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25 ‰ over most of the
grids, showing that the difference between the extracted-domain simulation and
full-domain simulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values is usually trivial.
However, near the southern border of the extracted domain, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>extracted-full</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.75 ‰
(fall and winter) and close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.00 ‰ (spring and
summer), suggesting the extracted domain may be required for accurate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The role of enhanced NO${}_{{x}}$ loss}?><title>The role of enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss</title>
      <p id="d1e8683">The emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss simulations
significantly alter the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the “normal
deposition” scenarios. Again, the enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss cases are removing
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at rates similar to those by removal via its conversion into
HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposited is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (assuming no photochemical isotope effects), and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is that in the residual NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The impact of
enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss on the residual NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was assessed using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>hi-no</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the difference between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values under the “enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss” and “no
deposition” scenarios. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>hi-no</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> range was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 ‰ and was especially obvious downwind of the
locations with large emission rates, such as power plants or megacities
(Fig. 11). This can be explained in a similar fashion to the no
deposition scenarios (Fig. S18a), where the dispersion of the isotopically
heavier NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from big cities, major highways, and power plants
elevated the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in rural areas, and the
dispersion of the isotopically lighter biogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission lowered
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the surrounding grids located in the
suburb of major cities (Fig. S18b). When enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss is used,
the transport, mixing, and dispersion of local NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are
restricted to a smaller geographical extent (Fig. S18b), leading to different
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values relative to no deposition. The temporal
heterogeneity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>hi-no</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the domain was
examined and the impact of enhancing deposition rates of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was explored on a seasonal basis
(Fig. 12). The seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>hi-no</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values range
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.67 ‰ to 5.34 ‰, with an
average of 0.51 ‰. The overall pattern of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>hi-no</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values shows that due to deposition, the
atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> became isotopically lighter over the majority of the
grids since EGU and vehicle NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is not being transported as far.
Conversely, in grids that contain or surround power plants and big cities,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases because it is not as effectively
mixing with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from nearby grids. The enhanced
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss simulation was used as a proxy to present the isotope effects
associated with the “pseudo photochemical transformation” of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The complete isotope effect of tropospheric photochemistry will be
addressed in future work, which incorporates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N into the chemical
mechanism of CMAQ for the simulation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e9225">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>hi-no</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 18:00 UTC on 25 July.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e9256">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of dry deposition (a proxy for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) simulated by CMAQ show similar monthly variations
and seasonal trends to SMOKE (Fig. S22). The ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values within each month were narrower, compared to the
simulation from SMOKE, with a minimum during February (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.7 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.4 ‰) and a maximum during August
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.8 ‰ to  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.2 ‰). The seasonal trend shows
low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in deposition during summer, with the
median around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.4 ‰ and slightly higher values during
winter (median around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.0 ‰). Therefore, the CMAQ
simulation inherits the monthly variations and seasonal trends from SMOKE,
while the atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes isotopically heavier, after taking
atmospheric mixing and transport into account. As mentioned above, most of
the NADP sites are located away from big cities and power plants. Thus, the
atmospheric mixing and transport led to the isotopically heavier atmospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e9407">The difference between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
(‰) values of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under the enhanced
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario and no deposition scenario (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>hi-no</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) during each season (winter: January–March; spring: April–June;
summer: July–September; fall: October–December), throughout the Midwest, simulated by CMAQ,
based on NEI 2002 and 2016 meteorology.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <label>3.7</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Model--observation comparison of $\delta^{{15}}$NO${}_{{x}}$}?><title>Model–observation comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e9495">In order to evaluate the SMOKE/CMAQ simulations of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, they were compared to two recent studies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The first comparison was relative to rainwater
measurements in West Lafayette, IN, from 9 July to 5 August 2016 (Walters et al., 2018). The measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values
ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33.8 ‰ to 0.2 ‰, with
a median of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.02 ‰. Under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario using 2016 meteorology,
the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.19 ‰) was 3.3 ‰ less negative than
the observations, and the range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.9 ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.7 ‰) was about half that in the observations (Fig. 13, top, Table S7). The predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was similar
regardless of whether 2016 or 2002 meteorology was used but was closer to
the measured values compared to the emission only simulations (Fig. 13, top). It is not surprising that the measurements are more negative than
the observations because the model does not account for isotope
fractionation during the conversion of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our previous
work has shown that the photochemical isotope effect enriches NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
depletes NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fang et al., 2021; Walters and Michalski, 2015),
and thus the lower measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to model is
consistent with this isotopic depletion. Our model simulations were also
compared to on-road vehicle plume measurement along Midwest highways from
8 to 18 August  2015 (Miller et al., 2017). The box plot also shows more
accurate estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N after considering the atmospheric
mixing with the emission from surrounding grids (Fig. 13, bottom). Using the
emission only scenario, the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mean was
about 3 ‰ more negative than the observations. The
predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario for these samples along Midwest highways
was closer to the measured values, compared to the emission only
simulations, regardless of whether 2016 or 2002 meteorology was used. The modeled values
are quite close to the observations, suggesting that the photochemical isotope
effect is small for these samples. This is not surprising given they were
collected on major highways where NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are high and the
timescale between collection and emission is small, and thus only a small
fraction of emitted NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> would have been converted to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
minimizing the photochemical isotope effect.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e9835">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions at Lafayette, IN (top),
and along Midwest highways (bottom), simulated by SMOKE <bold>(a)</bold>, CMAQ based on
2016 <bold>(b)</bold> and 2002 meteorology <bold>(c)</bold>, compared with the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(d)</bold> (box: lower quartile, median, upper quartile; whisker:
lower extreme, upper extreme)
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e9897">The 30-fold enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss (see methods) was used to simulate the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that was then compared to observations (Fig. 14). As
previously noted, rather than explicitly converting NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
via the chemical mechanism in CMAQ, which would require writing an
isotope-enabled chemical scheme with appropriate rate constants, we
amplified NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition as a surrogate. This amplification reduced the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime to about 1 d; thus by calculating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the deposition fraction, as opposed to residual NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the atmosphere, we are approximating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in deposition. The simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was compared to
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collected at NADP sites within Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio in
the year 2002 (Table S4). The NEI 2002 and WRF2002 were used for the SMOKE
emission model and CMAQ simulations, respectively. The value of deposition
was calculated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the hourly mole fraction
of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopologue deposited (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
deposition. The total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposited (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) used to calculate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was the amount deposited 5 d prior to the sampling date
since the NADP deposition collection integrates the week.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e10298">The emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss CMAQ-predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition using NEI 2002 and
2002 meteorology compared to the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of rain
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at NADP sites within IN, IL, and OH. The photochemical
isotope enrichment factor (‰) correction used for each
site is noted in the legend.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/4239/2022/gmd-15-4239-2022-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e10374">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition simulated by CMAQ under
the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M928" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario at each
site were compared with the measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from prior studies (Mase, 2010; Riha, 2013). While the scatter plot
shows a moderate positive correlation between observed and simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the simulated value is consistently lighter than the
sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 14, top). The magnitude of this
negative bias varies among the NADP sites (Fig. S23) and is attributed to
isotope fractionation during the conversion NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
enriches NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fang et al., 2021; Walters and Michalski, 2015).
Globally, this enrichment has been estimated at 3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8 ‰ (Song et al., 2021). But this enrichment is a
function of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and oxidant loading, as well as temperature and
photolysis rate (Fang et al., 2021), and is not expected to be the same at
each NADP site. After adjusting the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N by raising
the values by the average of the difference between sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
and simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M943" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N for each site, the scatter plots of sample
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N vs. simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N fit well into the
1 : 1 line (Fig. 14, bottom). The complete <inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-incorporated
chemical mechanisms will be explored in a future study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e10608">The evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M947" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values along the “journey” of
atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M948" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were traced, using our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-incorporated SMOKE and
CMAQ. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under the emission only scenario was
simulated by SMOKE, using the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M952" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from NEI emission sectors
and the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M953" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values from previous research. The
SMOKE simulation indicates that the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M954" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from biogenic sources
is the key driver for the variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M955" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, especially among
the Midwestern NADP sites. The uncertainties in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission are less than 5 ‰ over the majority of the grids
within the Midwest, which were well below the difference among the assigned
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M958" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for different NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M960" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources
(Fig. S24). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M961" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M962" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport scenario was simulated by CMAQ, using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M964" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-incorporated
emission input dataset generated from SMOKE, as well as the meteorology
input dataset generated from WRF and MCIP. The CMAQ simulation indicates
that the PBL height is the key driver for the mixture of anthropogenic and
natural NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M965" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission, which deepens the gap between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M966" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M971" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M973" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario was
simulated by enhancing NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M974" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition in CMAQ simulation, to show how
lifetime chemistry alters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M975" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M976" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values before it can
be transported along significant distances, assuming no isotope
fractionation during chemical conversion or deposition.</p>
      <p id="d1e10900">The simulations under emission only scenario and emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M977" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M978" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M979" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario were compared to the
measurements in West Lafayette, Indiana. The simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M980" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
agreed well with the seasonal trend and monthly variation. The simulated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M981" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M982" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under the emission only scenario was less
negative than the corresponding measurements in West Lafayette, IN, taken
from July to August 2016. Thus, if we only consider the effects from
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M983" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources, it is possible that the emissions from soil, livestock waste, off-road
vehicles, and natural-gas power plant in West Lafayette, IN, are underestimated, and the emissions from the on-road vehicles and coal-fired
power plants in West Lafayette, IN, are possibly overestimated. The simulated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M984" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M985" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M986" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M987" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M988" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario was about 3 ‰ closer to the
corresponding measurements in West Lafayette, IN, compared to the
emission only simulations. The simulations under the emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M989" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M990" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M991" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss scenario were also compared to the
measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M992" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M993" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from NADP sites within
Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, and Kentucky. The sample-by-sample comparison shows
a moderate positive correlation between observed and simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M994" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M995" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the negative bias varying among the NADP sites. This
bias is attributed to isotope fractionation during the conversion of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M996" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
into NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M997" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, affected by different NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M998" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, VOCs, and oxidant loading, as
well as temperature and photolysis rate, at each NADP site. Therefore,
future work will explore how tropospheric photochemistry alters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M999" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1000" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by incorporating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1001" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N into the chemical mechanism of
CMAQ and comparing the simulation with the corresponding measurements. With
the validation of our nitrogen isotopes incorporating CMAQ, the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1002" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission inventories could be effectively evaluated and improved.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e11152">The source code for SMOKE version 4.6 is
available at <uri>https://github.com/CEMPD/SMOKE/releases/tag/SMOKEv46_Sep2018</uri> (last access: 1 March 2021) (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4480334" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4480334</ext-link>, Baek and Seppanen, 2021). The source code for CMAQ version 5.2.1 is available at <uri>https://github.com/USEPA/CMAQ/tree/5.2.1</uri> (last access: 1 May 2018) (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1212601</ext-link>, US EPA Office of Research and Development, 2018). The detailed simulation results
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1003" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1004" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission based on 2002 and 2016 versions
of the National Emission Inventory and the associated Python codes are archived
on Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4048992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4048992</ext-link>, Fang, 2020a). The input datasets for WRF
simulation are available at <uri>https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/data/</uri> (National Centers for Environmental Information, 2018).
The detailed simulation results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1005" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of atmospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1006" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under all scenarios discussed in this paper and the CMAQ-based
c-shell script for generating BCON for the extracted-domain simulation are
archived on Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4311987</ext-link>, Fang, 2020b).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e11217">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4239-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4239-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e11226">HF and GM were the
investigator for the project and organized the tasks. HF developed the
model codes, performed the simulation to incorporate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1007" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N into SMOKE
outputs and generate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1008" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values and reconstruct CMAQ by
incorporating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1009" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N, and performed the simulation to generate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1010" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values. GM helped HF in interpreting the
results. HF prepared the manuscript with contributions from all
co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e11272">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-author has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e11278">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e11284">We would like to thank the Purdue Research
Foundation, the Purdue Climate Change Research Center, and the National
Science Foundation (AGS award 1903646) for providing funding for the
project. We would like to thank Scott Spak from the School of Urban and
Regional Planning, University of Iowa, for simulating SMOKE using NEI 2002.
We would like to thank Tomas Ratkus from the Department of Earth, Atmospheric,
and Planetary Sciences and Steven Plite and Frank Bakhit from the Rosen Center for
Advanced Computing, Purdue University, for setting up CMAQ on Purdue Research
Computing for this project.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e11289">This research has been supported by   the Purdue Research
Foundation, the Purdue Climate Change Research Center, and the National
Science Foundation (AGS award 1903646).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e11295">This paper was edited by Slimane Bekki and Christian Folberth and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Almaraz, M., Bai, E., Wang, C., Trousdell, J., Conley, S., Faloona, I., and
Houlton, B. Z.: Agriculture is a major source of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1011" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in
California, Sci. Adv.,   4, eaao3477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao3477" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aao3477</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ammann, M., Siegwolf, R., Pichlmayer, F., Suter, M., Saurer, M. and Brunold,
C.: Estimating the uptake of traffic-derived NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1012" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1013" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N abundance in
Norway spruce needles, Oecologia, 118, 124–131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s004420050710</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baek B. H. and Seppanen C.: CEMPD/SMOKE: SMOKE v4.8.1 Public Release (January 29, 2021), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4480334" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4480334</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>de Foy, B., Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Lamsal, L. N., and Duncan, B. N.:
Estimates of power plant NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1014" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and lifetimes from OMI NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1015" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> satellite
retrievals, Atmos. Environ., 116, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.056</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dignon, J. and Hameed, S.: Global emissions of nitrogen and sulfur oxides
from 1860 to 1980, J. Air Waste Manage.,  39, 180–186,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08940630.1989.10466519" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/08940630.1989.10466519</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duncan, B. N., Yoshida, Y., De Foy, B., Lamsal, L. N., Streets, D. G., Lu,
Z., Pickering, K. E., and Krotkov, N. A.: The observed response of Ozone
Monitoring Instrument (OMI) NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1016" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1017" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission controls on power
plants in the United States: 2005–2011, Atmos. Environ., 81, 102–111,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.068</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Elliott, E. M., Kendall, C., Boyer, E. W., Burns, D. A., Lear, G. G.,
Golden, H. E., Harlin, K., Bytnerowicz, A., Butler, T. J., and Glatz, R.:
Dual nitrate isotopes in dry deposition: Utility for partitioning NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1018" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
source contributions to landscape nitrogen deposition, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 114, G04020, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000889" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JG000889</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Elliott, E. M., Kendall, C., Wankel, S. D., Burns, D. A., Boyer, E. W.,
Harlin, K., Bain, D. J., and Butler, T. J.: Nitrogen isotopes as indicators
of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1019" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source contributions to atmospheric nitrate deposition across the
midwestern and northeastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 7661–7667,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070898t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es070898t</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fang, H.:  Simulating δ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1020" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1021" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission within Midwestern United States, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4048993" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4048993</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fang, H.:  Simulating δ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1022" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1023" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the impacts from atmospheric processes, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4311987</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fang, H., Walters, W. W., Mase, D., and Michalski, G.: iNRACM: incorporating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1024" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N into the Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanism (RACM) for assessing the role photochemistry plays in controlling the isotopic composition of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1025" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1026" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and atmospheric nitrate, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5001–5022, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5001-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-5001-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Farrell, A., Carter, R., and Raufer, R.: The NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1027" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Budget: Market-based control
of tropospheric ozone in the northeastern United States, Resour. Energy
Econ.,  21, 103–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(98)00035-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0928-7655(98)00035-9</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Felix, J. D. and Elliott, E. M.: The agricultural history of human-nitrogen
interactions as recorded in ice core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1028" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1029" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1030" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Geophys. Res. Lett.,  40, 1642–1646,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50209</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Felix, J. D. and Elliott, E. M.: Isotopic composition of passively collected
nitrogen dioxide emissions: Vehicle, soil and livestock source signatures,
Atmos. Environ., 92, 359–366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.005</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Felix, J. D., Elliott, E. M., and Shaw, S. L.: Nitrogen isotopic composition
of coal-fired power plant NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1031" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: Influence of emission controls and
implications for global emission inventories, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 3528–3535,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es203355v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es203355v</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Felix, J. D., Elliott, E. M., Avery, G. B., Kieber, R. J., Mead, R. N.,
Willey, J. D., and Mullaugh, K. M.: Isotopic composition of nitrate in
sequential Hurricane Irene precipitation samples: Implications for changing
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1032" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources, Atmos. Environ., 106, 191–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.075</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fibiger, D. L., Hastings, M. G., Lew, A. F., and Peltier, R. E.: Collection
of NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1033" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for isotopic analysis of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1034" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, Anal. Chem., 86, 12115–12121,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac502968e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac502968e</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fujita, E. M., Croes, B. E., Bennett, C. L., Lawson, D. R., Lurmann, F. W.,
and Main, H. H.: Comparison of emission inventory and ambient concentration
ratios of CO, NMOG, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1035" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in California's South Coast Air Basin, J. Air
Waste Manage., 42, 264–276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10466989" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10473289.1992.10466989</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R.
W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A.,
Holland, E. A., Karl, D. M., Michaels, A. F., Porter, J. H., Townsend, A. R.,
and Vörösmarty, C. J.: Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future,
Biogeochemistry, 70, 153–226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Garten, C. T.: Nitrogen isotope composition of ammonium and nitrate in bulk
precipitation and forest throughfall, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 47, 33–45,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319208027017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/03067319208027017</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hall, S. J., Ogata, E. M., Weintraub, S. R., Baker, M. A., Ehleringer, J.
R., Czimczik, C. I., and Bowling, D. R.: Convergence in nitrogen deposition
and cryptic isotopic variation across urban and agricultural valleys in
northern Utah, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 121, 2340–2355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JG003354</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heaton, T. H. E.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1036" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N14N ratios of nitrate and ammonium in rain at Pretoria,
South Africa, Atmos. Environ., 21, 843–852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(87)90080-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(87)90080-1</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heaton, T. H. E.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1037" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N/14N ratios of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1038" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from vehicle engines and coal-fired
power stations, Tellus B,  42, 304–307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1990.00007.x-i1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0889.1990.00007.x-i1</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoering, T.: The isotopic composition of the ammonia and the nitrate ion in
rain, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 2, 97–102,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(57)90021-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(57)90021-2</ext-link>, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Houyoux, M.: Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions Inventory Technical Support Document, US EPA,  <uri>https://swap.stanford.edu/20140418220813/http://www.epa.gov/air/interstateairquality/pdfs/finaltech01.pdf</uri> (last access: 22 May 2018), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ingalls, M. N.:  On-road vehicle emission factors from measurements in a Los Angeles area tunnel, in: Proceedings of the Air &amp; Waste Management Association 82nd Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California, 25–30 June 1989, 89-137.3, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jaeglé, L., Steinberger, L., Martin, R. V., and Chance, K.: Global
partitioning of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1039" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources using satellite observations: Relative roles of
fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning and soil emissions,  Faraday
Discuss., 130, 407–423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B502128F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B502128F</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Johansson, C.: Pine forest: a negligible sink for atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1040" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in rural
Sweden, Tellus B, 39, 426–438,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v39i5.15360" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v39i5.15360</ext-link>,
1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, S. W., Heckel, A., Frost, G. J., Richter, A., Gleason, J., Burrows, J.
P., McKeen, S., Hsie, E. Y., Granier, C., and Trainer, M.: NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1041" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns in the
western United States observed from space and simulated by a regional
chemistry model and their implications for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1042" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D11301,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011343</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laughner, J. L. and Cohen, R. C.: Direct observation of changing NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1043" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
lifetime in North American cities, Science, 366, 723–727, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, D. and Wang, X.: Nitrogen isotopic signature of soil-released nitric
oxide (NO) after fertilizer application, Atmos. Environ., 42, 4747–4754,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.042</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liao, T., Gui, K., Jiang, W., Wang, S., Wang, B., Zeng, Z., Che, H., Wang,
Y., and Sun, Y.: Air stagnation and its impact on air quality during winter
in Sichuan and Chongqing, southwestern China, Sci. Total Environ., 635, 576–585,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.122</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lighty, J. A. S., Veranth, J. M., and Sarofim, A. F.: Combustion aerosols:
Factors governing their size and composition and implications to human
health, J. Air Waste Manage., 50, 1565–1618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464197" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10473289.2000.10464197</ext-link>,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, L., Guo, J., Miao, Y., Liu, L., Li, J., Chen, D., He, J., and Cui, C.:
Elucidating the relationship between aerosol concentration and summertime
boundary layer structure in central China, Environ. Pollut., 241, 646–653,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.008</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., de Foy, B., Lamsal, L. N., Duncan, B. N., and Xing, J.: Emissions of nitrogen oxides from US urban areas: estimation from Ozone Monitoring Instrument retrievals for 2005–2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10367–10383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10367-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10367-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ludwig, J., Meixner, F. X., Vogel, B., and Forstner, J.: Soil-air exchange of
nitric oxide: An overview of processes, environmental factors, and modeling
studies, Biogeochemistry, 52, 225–257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006424330555" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1006424330555</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mase, D. F.: A coupled modeling and observational approach to understanding
oxygen-18 in atmospheric nitrate, PhD thesis, Purdue University, United
States of America, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miao, Y., Li, J., Miao, S., Che, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Zhu, R., and Liu,
S.: Interaction Between Planetary Boundary Layer and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1044" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Pollution in
Megacities in China: a Review, Curr. Pollut. Reports,  5, 261–271,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00124-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40726-019-00124-5</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miller, D. J., Wojtal, P. K., Clark, S. C., and Hastings, M. G.: Vehicle NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1045" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission plume isotopic signatures: Spatial variability across the eastern
United States, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 4698–4717, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025877" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025877</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miller, D. J., Chai, J., Guo, F., Dell, C. J., Karsten, H., and Hastings, M.
G.: Isotopic Composition of In Situ Soil NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1046" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Emissions in Manure-Fertilized
Cropland, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL079619</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moore, H.: The isotopic composition of ammonia, nitrogen dioxide and nitrate
in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 11, 1239–1243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(77)90102-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(77)90102-0</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>National Centers for Environmental Information: Index of /data, <uri>https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/data/</uri>, last access: 1 September 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Occhipinti, C., Aneja, V. P., Showers, W., and Niyogi, D.: Back-trajectory
analysis and source-receptor relationships: Particulate matter and nitrogen
isotopic composition in rainwater, J. Air  Waste Manage.,   58, 1215–1222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.58.9.1215" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3155/1047-3289.58.9.1215</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oke, T. R.: Boundary Layer Climates, 2nd Edn., Routledge, London, UK,  2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Parrish, D. D.: Critical evaluation of US on-road vehicle emission
inventories, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2288–2300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.033</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pearson, J., Wells, D. M., Seller, K. J., Bennett, A., Soares, A., Woodall,
J., and Ingrouille, M. J.: Traffic exposure increases natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1047" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N and heavy
metal concentrations in mosses, New Phytol.,  147, 317–326,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00702.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00702.x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pierce, T. E.: Reconsideration of the Emission Factors assumed in BEIS3 for
Three USGS Vegetation Categories: Shrubland, Coniferous Forest, and
Deciduous Forest, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pierson, W. R., Gertler, A. W., and Bradow, R. L.: Comparison of the scaqs
tunnel study with other onroad vehicle emission data, J. Air Waste Manage., 40, 1495–1504,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1990.10466799" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10473289.1990.10466799</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pierson, W. R., Gertler, A. W., Robinson, N. F., Sagebiel, J. C., Zielinska,
B., Bishop, G. A., Stedman, D. H., Zweidinger, R. B., and Ray, W. D.:
Real-world automotive emissions – summary of studies in the Fort McHenry and
Tuscarora Mountain Tunnels,   Atmos. Environ., 30, 2233–2256, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pouliot, G. and Pierce, T. E.: Integration of the Model of Emissions of
Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) into the CMAQ Modeling System, in:
18th International Emission Inventory Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, 14
April 2009, 14–17, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rasool, Q. Z., Zhang, R., Lash, B., Cohan, D. S., Cooter, E. J., Bash, J. O., and Lamsal, L. N.: Enhanced representation of soil NO emissions in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3177–3197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3177-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-3177-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Redling, K., Elliott, E., Bain, D., and Sherwell, J.: Highway contributions
to reactive nitrogen deposition: Tracing the fate of vehicular NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1048" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using
stable isotopes and plant biomonitors, Biogeochemistry, 116, 261–274,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9857-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-013-9857-x</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Riha, K. M.: The use of stable isotopes to constrain the nitrogen cycle, PhD thesis, Purdue University, United States of America, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Russell, K. M., Galloway, J. N., MacKo, S. A., Moody, J. L., and Scudlark, J.
R.: Sources of nitrogen in wet deposition to the Chesapeake Bay region,
Atmos. Environ., 32, 2453–2465, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00044-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00044-2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Savard, M. M., Bégin, C., Smirnoff, A., Marion, J., and Rioux-Paquette,
E.: Tree-ring nitrogen isotopes reflect anthropogenic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1049" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and
climatic effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 604–609, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es802437k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es802437k</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Savard, M. M., Cole, A., Smirnoff, A., and Vet, R.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1050" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1051" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of
atmospheric N species simultaneously collected using sector-based samplers
distant from sources – Isotopic inheritance and fractionation, Atmos.
Environ., 162, 11–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.010</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S. E.: The Whitehouse effect – Shortwave radiative forcing of
climate by anthropogenic aerosols: An overview, J. Aerosol Sci.,  27, 359–382,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(95)00533-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(95)00533-1</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schwede, D., Pouliot, G., and Pierce, T.:  Changes to the biogenic emissions inventory system version 3 (BEIS3), in: Proceedings of 4th Annual CMAS User's Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 26–28 September 2005, 26–28, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, US, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Selden, T. M., Forrest, A. S., and Lockhart, J. E.: Analyzing the
reductions in US air pollution emissions: 1970 to 1990, Land Economics,
1-21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3146990" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/3146990</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shu, L., Xie, M., Gao, D., Wang, T., Fang, D., Liu, Q., Huang, A., and Peng, L.: Regional severe particle pollution and its association with synoptic weather patterns in the Yangtze River Delta region, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12871–12891, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12871-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-12871-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Singer, B. C. and Harley, R. A.: A Fuel-Based Motor Vehicle Emission
Inventory, J. Air Waste Manage.,  46, 581–593, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1996.10467492" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10473289.1996.10467492</ext-link>,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Slovik, S., Siegmund, A., Fuhrer, H. W., and Heber, U.: Stomatal uptake of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1052" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1053" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1054" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by spruce crowns (Picea abies) and canopy damage in Central
Europe, New Phytol., 132, 661–676,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01884.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01884.x</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Snape, C. E., Sun, C., Fallick, A. E., Irons, R., and Haskell, J.: Potential of stable nitrogen isotope ratio measurements to resolve fuel and thermal NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1055" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in coal combustion, in: Proceeding of the American Chemical Society National Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, 23–27 March 2003, 225, U843-U843, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Song, W., Liu, X. Y., Hu, C. C., Chen, G. Y., Liu, X. J., Walters, W. W.,
and Liu, C. Q.: Important contributions of non-fossil fuel nitrogen
oxides emissions, Nat. Commun., 12, 1–7, 2021</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Spak, S., Holloway, T., Mednick, A., and Stone, B.: Evaluation of Bottom-Up
Mobile Emissions Inventories in the Upper Midwest, in: American Geophysical
Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, 10–14 December 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Srivastava, R. K., Neuffer, W., Grano, D., Khan, S., Staudt, J. E. and
Jozewicz, W.: Controlling NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1056" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from industrial sources, Environ.
Prog.,  24, 181–197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ep.10063</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stehfest, E. and Bouwman, L.: N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1057" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and NO emission from agricultural fields
and soils under natural vegetation: Summarizing available measurement data
and modeling of global annual emissions, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 74, 207–228,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thoene, B., Rennenberg, H., and Weber, P.: Absorption of atmospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1058" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by
spruce (Picea abies) trees: II. Parameterization of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1059" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes by controlled
dynamic chamber experiments, New Phytol.,  134, 257–266,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04630.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04630.x</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>United States Energy Information Administration: Electricity, <uri>https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia860/</uri> (last access: 6 April 2018), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency: National Emissions Inventory
(NEI), <uri>https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/national-emissions-inventory-nei</uri> (last access: 6 April 2018),
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency: Biogenic Emissions Landuse
Database, <uri>https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-modeling/biogenic-emissions-landuse-database-version-3-beld3</uri> (last access: 12 May 2019),
2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency: 2002 National Emissions
Inventory (NEI) Booklet,
<uri>https://archive.epa.gov/epa/air-emissions-inventories/2002-national-emissions-inventory-nei-booklet.html</uri> (last access: 12 May 2019),
2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>US EPA Office of Research and Development: CMAQ (5.2.1), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1212601</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vinken, G. C. M., Boersma, K. F., Maasakkers, J. D., Adon, M., and Martin, R. V.: Worldwide biogenic soil NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1060" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions inferred from OMI NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1061" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10363–10381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10363-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10363-2014</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vukovich, J. and Pierce, T.: The implementation of BEIS3 within the SMOKE
modeling framework, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Emissions
Inventory Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 15 April 2002, 15–18, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W. and Michalski, G.: Theoretical calculation of nitrogen
isotope equilibrium exchange fractionation factors for various NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1062" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
molecules, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 284–297,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.029</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Goodwin, S. R., and Michalski, G.: Nitrogen stable isotope
composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1063" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N) of vehicle-emitted NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1064" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Environ. Sci.
Technol.,  49, 2278–2285,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es505580v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es505580v</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Tharp, B. D., Fang, H., Kozak, B. J., and Michalski, G.:
Nitrogen Isotope Composition of Thermally Produced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1065" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from Various
Fossil-Fuel Combustion Sources, Environ. Sci. Technol.,  49, 11363–11371,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02769" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b02769</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Fang, H., and Michalski, G.: Summertime diurnal variations in
the isotopic composition of atmospheric nitrogen dioxide at a small
midwestern United States city, Atmos. Environ., 179, 1–11,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.047</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weber, P. and Rennenberg, H.: Dependency of nitrogen dioxide (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1066" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) fluxes to
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaves from NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1067" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, light intensity,
temperature and relative humidity determined from controlled dynamic chamber
experiments, Atmos. Environ.,  30, 3001–3009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00008-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(96)00008-8</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wong, S., Wang, W. C., Isaksen, I. S. A., Berntsen, T. K., and Sundet, J. K.:
A global climate-chemistry model study of present-day tropospheric chemistry
and radiative forcing from changes in tropospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1068" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> since the
preindustrial period, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D11309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003998" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003998</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xing, J., Pleim, J., Mathur, R., Pouliot, G., Hogrefe, C., Gan, C.-M., and Wei, C.: Historical gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in the United States from 1990 to 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7531–7549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yan, X., Ohara, T., and Akimoto, H.: Statistical modeling of global soil NOX
emissions, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,  19, GB3019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002276</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, Z. and Elliott, E. M.: Novel Method for Nitrogen Isotopic Analysis of
Soil-Emitted Nitric Oxide, Environ. Sci. Technol.,  51, 6268–6278,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00592" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00592</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Assessing the roles emission sources and atmospheric processes play in simulating <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N of atmospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> using CMAQ (version 5.2.1) and SMOKE (version 4.6)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Almaraz, M., Bai, E., Wang, C., Trousdell, J., Conley, S., Faloona, I., and
Houlton, B. Z.: Agriculture is a major source of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> pollution in
California, Sci. Adv.,   4, eaao3477, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao3477" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao3477</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Ammann, M., Siegwolf, R., Pichlmayer, F., Suter, M., Saurer, M. and Brunold,
C.: Estimating the uptake of traffic-derived NO<sub>2</sub> from <sup>15</sup>N abundance in
Norway spruce needles, Oecologia, 118, 124–131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050710</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baek B. H. and Seppanen C.: CEMPD/SMOKE: SMOKE v4.8.1 Public Release (January 29, 2021), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4480334" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4480334</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>de Foy, B., Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Lamsal, L. N., and Duncan, B. N.:
Estimates of power plant NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions and lifetimes from OMI NO<sub>2</sub> satellite
retrievals, Atmos. Environ., 116, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.056</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Dignon, J. and Hameed, S.: Global emissions of nitrogen and sulfur oxides
from 1860 to 1980, J. Air Waste Manage.,  39, 180–186,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08940630.1989.10466519" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/08940630.1989.10466519</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Duncan, B. N., Yoshida, Y., De Foy, B., Lamsal, L. N., Streets, D. G., Lu,
Z., Pickering, K. E., and Krotkov, N. A.: The observed response of Ozone
Monitoring Instrument (OMI) NO<sub>2</sub> columns to NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission controls on power
plants in the United States: 2005–2011, Atmos. Environ., 81, 102–111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.068</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Elliott, E. M., Kendall, C., Boyer, E. W., Burns, D. A., Lear, G. G.,
Golden, H. E., Harlin, K., Bytnerowicz, A., Butler, T. J., and Glatz, R.:
Dual nitrate isotopes in dry deposition: Utility for partitioning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>
source contributions to landscape nitrogen deposition, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 114, G04020, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000889" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000889</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Elliott, E. M., Kendall, C., Wankel, S. D., Burns, D. A., Boyer, E. W.,
Harlin, K., Bain, D. J., and Butler, T. J.: Nitrogen isotopes as indicators
of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> source contributions to atmospheric nitrate deposition across the
midwestern and northeastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 7661–7667,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070898t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es070898t</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fang, H.:  Simulating δ<sup>15</sup>N of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission within Midwestern United States, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4048993" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4048993</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Fang, H.:  Simulating δ<sup>15</sup>N of atmospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> with the impacts from atmospheric processes, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311987</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Fang, H., Walters, W. W., Mase, D., and Michalski, G.: iNRACM: incorporating <sup>15</sup>N into the Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanism (RACM) for assessing the role photochemistry plays in controlling the isotopic composition of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, NO<sub><i>y</i></sub>, and atmospheric nitrate, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5001–5022, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5001-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5001-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Farrell, A., Carter, R., and Raufer, R.: The NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Budget: Market-based control
of tropospheric ozone in the northeastern United States, Resour. Energy
Econ.,  21, 103–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(98)00035-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(98)00035-9</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Felix, J. D. and Elliott, E. M.: The agricultural history of human-nitrogen
interactions as recorded in ice core <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, Geophys. Res. Lett.,  40, 1642–1646,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50209</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Felix, J. D. and Elliott, E. M.: Isotopic composition of passively collected
nitrogen dioxide emissions: Vehicle, soil and livestock source signatures,
Atmos. Environ., 92, 359–366, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.005</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Felix, J. D., Elliott, E. M., and Shaw, S. L.: Nitrogen isotopic composition
of coal-fired power plant NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>: Influence of emission controls and
implications for global emission inventories, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 3528–3535,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es203355v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es203355v</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Felix, J. D., Elliott, E. M., Avery, G. B., Kieber, R. J., Mead, R. N.,
Willey, J. D., and Mullaugh, K. M.: Isotopic composition of nitrate in
sequential Hurricane Irene precipitation samples: Implications for changing
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> sources, Atmos. Environ., 106, 191–195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.075" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.075</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fibiger, D. L., Hastings, M. G., Lew, A. F., and Peltier, R. E.: Collection
of NO and NO<sub>2</sub> for isotopic analysis of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions, Anal. Chem., 86, 12115–12121,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac502968e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac502968e</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Fujita, E. M., Croes, B. E., Bennett, C. L., Lawson, D. R., Lurmann, F. W.,
and Main, H. H.: Comparison of emission inventory and ambient concentration
ratios of CO, NMOG, and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in California's South Coast Air Basin, J. Air
Waste Manage., 42, 264–276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10466989" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10466989</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R.
W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A.,
Holland, E. A., Karl, D. M., Michaels, A. F., Porter, J. H., Townsend, A. R.,
and Vörösmarty, C. J.: Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future,
Biogeochemistry, 70, 153–226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Garten, C. T.: Nitrogen isotope composition of ammonium and nitrate in bulk
precipitation and forest throughfall, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 47, 33–45,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319208027017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319208027017</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hall, S. J., Ogata, E. M., Weintraub, S. R., Baker, M. A., Ehleringer, J.
R., Czimczik, C. I., and Bowling, D. R.: Convergence in nitrogen deposition
and cryptic isotopic variation across urban and agricultural valleys in
northern Utah, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 121, 2340–2355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003354" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003354</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Heaton, T. H. E.: <sup>15</sup>N14N ratios of nitrate and ammonium in rain at Pretoria,
South Africa, Atmos. Environ., 21, 843–852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(87)90080-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(87)90080-1</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Heaton, T. H. E.: <sup>15</sup>N/14N ratios of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> from vehicle engines and coal-fired
power stations, Tellus B,  42, 304–307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1990.00007.x-i1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1990.00007.x-i1</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Hoering, T.: The isotopic composition of the ammonia and the nitrate ion in
rain, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 2, 97–102,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(57)90021-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(57)90021-2</a>, 1957.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Houyoux, M.: Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions Inventory Technical Support Document, US EPA,  <a href="https://swap.stanford.edu/20140418220813/http://www.epa.gov/air/interstateairquality/pdfs/finaltech01.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 22 May 2018), 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Ingalls, M. N.:  On-road vehicle emission factors from measurements in a Los Angeles area tunnel, in: Proceedings of the Air &amp; Waste Management Association 82nd Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California, 25–30 June 1989, 89-137.3, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Jaeglé, L., Steinberger, L., Martin, R. V., and Chance, K.: Global
partitioning of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> sources using satellite observations: Relative roles of
fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning and soil emissions,  Faraday
Discuss., 130, 407–423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B502128F" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B502128F</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Johansson, C.: Pine forest: a negligible sink for atmospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in rural
Sweden, Tellus B, 39, 426–438,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v39i5.15360" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v39i5.15360</a>,
1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Kim, S. W., Heckel, A., Frost, G. J., Richter, A., Gleason, J., Burrows, J.
P., McKeen, S., Hsie, E. Y., Granier, C., and Trainer, M.: NO<sub>2</sub> columns in the
western United States observed from space and simulated by a regional
chemistry model and their implications for NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D11301,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011343</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Laughner, J. L. and Cohen, R. C.: Direct observation of changing NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>
lifetime in North American cities, Science, 366, 723–727, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Li, D. and Wang, X.: Nitrogen isotopic signature of soil-released nitric
oxide (NO) after fertilizer application, Atmos. Environ., 42, 4747–4754,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.042</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Liao, T., Gui, K., Jiang, W., Wang, S., Wang, B., Zeng, Z., Che, H., Wang,
Y., and Sun, Y.: Air stagnation and its impact on air quality during winter
in Sichuan and Chongqing, southwestern China, Sci. Total Environ., 635, 576–585,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.122</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lighty, J. A. S., Veranth, J. M., and Sarofim, A. F.: Combustion aerosols:
Factors governing their size and composition and implications to human
health, J. Air Waste Manage., 50, 1565–1618, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464197" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464197</a>,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Liu, L., Guo, J., Miao, Y., Liu, L., Li, J., Chen, D., He, J., and Cui, C.:
Elucidating the relationship between aerosol concentration and summertime
boundary layer structure in central China, Environ. Pollut., 241, 646–653,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.008</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., de Foy, B., Lamsal, L. N., Duncan, B. N., and Xing, J.: Emissions of nitrogen oxides from US urban areas: estimation from Ozone Monitoring Instrument retrievals for 2005–2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10367–10383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10367-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10367-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Ludwig, J., Meixner, F. X., Vogel, B., and Forstner, J.: Soil-air exchange of
nitric oxide: An overview of processes, environmental factors, and modeling
studies, Biogeochemistry, 52, 225–257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006424330555" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006424330555</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Mase, D. F.: A coupled modeling and observational approach to understanding
oxygen-18 in atmospheric nitrate, PhD thesis, Purdue University, United
States of America, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Miao, Y., Li, J., Miao, S., Che, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Zhu, R., and Liu,
S.: Interaction Between Planetary Boundary Layer and PM<sub>2.5</sub> Pollution in
Megacities in China: a Review, Curr. Pollut. Reports,  5, 261–271,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00124-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00124-5</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Miller, D. J., Wojtal, P. K., Clark, S. C., and Hastings, M. G.: Vehicle NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>
emission plume isotopic signatures: Spatial variability across the eastern
United States, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 4698–4717, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025877" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025877</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Miller, D. J., Chai, J., Guo, F., Dell, C. J., Karsten, H., and Hastings, M.
G.: Isotopic Composition of In Situ Soil NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Emissions in Manure-Fertilized
Cropland, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079619</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Moore, H.: The isotopic composition of ammonia, nitrogen dioxide and nitrate
in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 11, 1239–1243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(77)90102-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(77)90102-0</a>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
National Centers for Environmental Information: Index of /data, <a href="https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/data/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 September 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Occhipinti, C., Aneja, V. P., Showers, W., and Niyogi, D.: Back-trajectory
analysis and source-receptor relationships: Particulate matter and nitrogen
isotopic composition in rainwater, J. Air  Waste Manage.,   58, 1215–1222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.58.9.1215" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.58.9.1215</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Oke, T. R.: Boundary Layer Climates, 2nd Edn., Routledge, London, UK,  2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Parrish, D. D.: Critical evaluation of US on-road vehicle emission
inventories, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2288–2300, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.033</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pearson, J., Wells, D. M., Seller, K. J., Bennett, A., Soares, A., Woodall,
J., and Ingrouille, M. J.: Traffic exposure increases natural <sup>15</sup>N and heavy
metal concentrations in mosses, New Phytol.,  147, 317–326,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00702.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00702.x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Pierce, T. E.: Reconsideration of the Emission Factors assumed in BEIS3 for
Three USGS Vegetation Categories: Shrubland, Coniferous Forest, and
Deciduous Forest, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Pierson, W. R., Gertler, A. W., and Bradow, R. L.: Comparison of the scaqs
tunnel study with other onroad vehicle emission data, J. Air Waste Manage., 40, 1495–1504,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1990.10466799" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1990.10466799</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Pierson, W. R., Gertler, A. W., Robinson, N. F., Sagebiel, J. C., Zielinska,
B., Bishop, G. A., Stedman, D. H., Zweidinger, R. B., and Ray, W. D.:
Real-world automotive emissions – summary of studies in the Fort McHenry and
Tuscarora Mountain Tunnels,   Atmos. Environ., 30, 2233–2256, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Pouliot, G. and Pierce, T. E.: Integration of the Model of Emissions of
Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) into the CMAQ Modeling System, in:
18th International Emission Inventory Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, 14
April 2009, 14–17, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Rasool, Q. Z., Zhang, R., Lash, B., Cohan, D. S., Cooter, E. J., Bash, J. O., and Lamsal, L. N.: Enhanced representation of soil NO emissions in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3177–3197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3177-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3177-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Redling, K., Elliott, E., Bain, D., and Sherwell, J.: Highway contributions
to reactive nitrogen deposition: Tracing the fate of vehicular NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> using
stable isotopes and plant biomonitors, Biogeochemistry, 116, 261–274,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9857-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9857-x</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Riha, K. M.: The use of stable isotopes to constrain the nitrogen cycle, PhD thesis, Purdue University, United States of America, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Russell, K. M., Galloway, J. N., MacKo, S. A., Moody, J. L., and Scudlark, J.
R.: Sources of nitrogen in wet deposition to the Chesapeake Bay region,
Atmos. Environ., 32, 2453–2465, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00044-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00044-2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Savard, M. M., Bégin, C., Smirnoff, A., Marion, J., and Rioux-Paquette,
E.: Tree-ring nitrogen isotopes reflect anthropogenic NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions and
climatic effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 604–609, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es802437k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es802437k</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Savard, M. M., Cole, A., Smirnoff, A., and Vet, R.: Δ<sup>15</sup>N values of
atmospheric N species simultaneously collected using sector-based samplers
distant from sources – Isotopic inheritance and fractionation, Atmos.
Environ., 162, 11–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.010</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S. E.: The Whitehouse effect – Shortwave radiative forcing of
climate by anthropogenic aerosols: An overview, J. Aerosol Sci.,  27, 359–382,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(95)00533-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(95)00533-1</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Schwede, D., Pouliot, G., and Pierce, T.:  Changes to the biogenic emissions inventory system version 3 (BEIS3), in: Proceedings of 4th Annual CMAS User's Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 26–28 September 2005, 26–28, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, US, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Selden, T. M., Forrest, A. S., and Lockhart, J. E.: Analyzing the
reductions in US air pollution emissions: 1970 to 1990, Land Economics,
1-21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3146990" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/3146990</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Shu, L., Xie, M., Gao, D., Wang, T., Fang, D., Liu, Q., Huang, A., and Peng, L.: Regional severe particle pollution and its association with synoptic weather patterns in the Yangtze River Delta region, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12871–12891, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12871-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12871-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Singer, B. C. and Harley, R. A.: A Fuel-Based Motor Vehicle Emission
Inventory, J. Air Waste Manage.,  46, 581–593, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1996.10467492" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1996.10467492</a>,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Slovik, S., Siegmund, A., Fuhrer, H. W., and Heber, U.: Stomatal uptake of
SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and O<sub>3</sub> by spruce crowns (Picea abies) and canopy damage in Central
Europe, New Phytol., 132, 661–676,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01884.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01884.x</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Snape, C. E., Sun, C., Fallick, A. E., Irons, R., and Haskell, J.: Potential of stable nitrogen isotope ratio measurements to resolve fuel and thermal NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in coal combustion, in: Proceeding of the American Chemical Society National Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, 23–27 March 2003, 225, U843-U843, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Song, W., Liu, X. Y., Hu, C. C., Chen, G. Y., Liu, X. J., Walters, W. W.,
and Liu, C. Q.: Important contributions of non-fossil fuel nitrogen
oxides emissions, Nat. Commun., 12, 1–7, 2021
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Spak, S., Holloway, T., Mednick, A., and Stone, B.: Evaluation of Bottom-Up
Mobile Emissions Inventories in the Upper Midwest, in: American Geophysical
Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, 10–14 December 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Srivastava, R. K., Neuffer, W., Grano, D., Khan, S., Staudt, J. E. and
Jozewicz, W.: Controlling NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission from industrial sources, Environ.
Prog.,  24, 181–197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10063</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Stehfest, E. and Bouwman, L.: N<sub>2</sub>O and NO emission from agricultural fields
and soils under natural vegetation: Summarizing available measurement data
and modeling of global annual emissions, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 74, 207–228,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Thoene, B., Rennenberg, H., and Weber, P.: Absorption of atmospheric NO<sub>2</sub> by
spruce (Picea abies) trees: II. Parameterization of NO<sub>2</sub> fluxes by controlled
dynamic chamber experiments, New Phytol.,  134, 257–266,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04630.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04630.x</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>United States Energy Information Administration: Electricity, <a href="https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia860/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 6 April 2018), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency: National Emissions Inventory
(NEI), <a href="https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/national-emissions-inventory-nei" target="_blank"/> (last access: 6 April 2018),
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency: Biogenic Emissions Landuse
Database, <a href="https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-modeling/biogenic-emissions-landuse-database-version-3-beld3" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 May 2019),
2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency: 2002 National Emissions
Inventory (NEI) Booklet,
<a href="https://archive.epa.gov/epa/air-emissions-inventories/2002-national-emissions-inventory-nei-booklet.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 May 2019),
2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
US EPA Office of Research and Development: CMAQ (5.2.1), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212601" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212601</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation> Vinken, G. C. M., Boersma, K. F., Maasakkers, J. D., Adon, M., and Martin, R. V.: Worldwide biogenic soil NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions inferred from OMI NO<sub>2</sub> observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10363–10381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10363-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10363-2014</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Vukovich, J. and Pierce, T.: The implementation of BEIS3 within the SMOKE
modeling framework, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Emissions
Inventory Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 15 April 2002, 15–18, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W. and Michalski, G.: Theoretical calculation of nitrogen
isotope equilibrium exchange fractionation factors for various NO<sub><i>y</i></sub>
molecules, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 284–297,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.029</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Goodwin, S. R., and Michalski, G.: Nitrogen stable isotope
composition (<i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N) of vehicle-emitted NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, Environ. Sci.
Technol.,  49, 2278–2285,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es505580v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es505580v</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Tharp, B. D., Fang, H., Kozak, B. J., and Michalski, G.:
Nitrogen Isotope Composition of Thermally Produced NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> from Various
Fossil-Fuel Combustion Sources, Environ. Sci. Technol.,  49, 11363–11371,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02769" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02769</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Fang, H., and Michalski, G.: Summertime diurnal variations in
the isotopic composition of atmospheric nitrogen dioxide at a small
midwestern United States city, Atmos. Environ., 179, 1–11,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.047</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Weber, P. and Rennenberg, H.: Dependency of nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) fluxes to
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaves from NO<sub>2</sub> concentration, light intensity,
temperature and relative humidity determined from controlled dynamic chamber
experiments, Atmos. Environ.,  30, 3001–3009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00008-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00008-8</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Wong, S., Wang, W. C., Isaksen, I. S. A., Berntsen, T. K., and Sundet, J. K.:
A global climate-chemistry model study of present-day tropospheric chemistry
and radiative forcing from changes in tropospheric O<sub>3</sub> since the
preindustrial period, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D11309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003998" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003998</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Xing, J., Pleim, J., Mathur, R., Pouliot, G., Hogrefe, C., Gan, C.-M., and Wei, C.: Historical gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in the United States from 1990 to 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7531–7549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Yan, X., Ohara, T., and Akimoto, H.: Statistical modeling of global soil NOX
emissions, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,  19, GB3019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002276</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Z. and Elliott, E. M.: Novel Method for Nitrogen Isotopic Analysis of
Soil-Emitted Nitric Oxide, Environ. Sci. Technol.,  51, 6268–6278,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00592" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00592</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
