<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-14-5239-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Improvements to the representation of BVOC chemistry–climate interactions in
UKCA (v11.5) with the CRI-Strat 2 mechanism: incorporation and evaluation</article-title><alt-title>CRI-Strat 2: Improvements to the representation of BVOC chemistry–climate interactions</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{CRI-Strat~2: Improvements to the representation of BVOC chemistry--climate interactions}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~Weber et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weber</surname><given-names>James</given-names></name>
          <email>jmw240@cam.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0643-2026</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Archer-Nicholls</surname><given-names>Scott</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3311-9003</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Abraham</surname><given-names>Nathan Luke</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3750-3544</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>Youngsub M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Bannan</surname><given-names>Thomas J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1760-6522</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Percival</surname><given-names>Carl J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Bacak</surname><given-names>Asan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Artaxo</surname><given-names>Paulo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-3036</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Jenkin</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7669-2985</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>M. Anwar H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7836-3344</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Shallcross</surname><given-names>Dudley E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9 aff10">
          <name><surname>Schwantes</surname><given-names>Rebecca H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-3718</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11 aff12">
          <name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>Jonathan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Archibald</surname><given-names>Alex T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-4180</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry, University of
Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester,
Manchester, M13 9PL, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Turkish Accelerator and Radiation Laboratory, Ankara University
Institute of Accelerator Technologies, Gölbaşi Campus, 06830
Gölbaşi, Ankara, Turkey</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Physics Institute, University of São Paulo, Rua do Matão 1371,
CEP 05351-015, São Paulo, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Atmospheric Chemistry Services, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 4BQ, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Biogeochemistry Research Centre, School of Chemistry, University of
Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Chemical Sciences Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Boulder, CO 80305, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for
Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>Energy, Environment and Water Research Centre, The Cyprus Institute,
Nicosia, Cyprus</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">James Weber (jmw240@cam.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>August</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>5239</fpage><lpage>5268</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 James Weber et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e277">We present the first incorporation of the Common Representative
Intermediates version 2.2 tropospheric chemistry mechanism, CRI v2.2,
combined with stratospheric chemistry, into the global chemistry–climate
United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosols (UKCA) model to give the CRI-Strat 2
mechanism. A rigorous comparison of CRI-Strat 2 with the earlier version,
CRI-Strat, is performed in UKCA in addition to an evaluation of three
mechanisms, CRI-Strat 2, CRI-Strat and the standard UKCA chemical mechanism,
StratTrop v1.0, against a wide array of surface and airborne chemical data.</p>
    <p id="d1e280">CRI-Strat 2 comprises a state-of-the-art isoprene scheme, optimized against
the Master Chemical Mechanism v3.3.1, which includes isoprene peroxy radical isomerization,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling through the addition of photolabile hydroperoxy aldehydes
(HPALDs), and isoprene epoxy diol (IEPOX) formation. CRI-Strat 2 also features updates to several
rate constants for the inorganic chemistry, including the reactions of
inorganic nitrogen and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
    <p id="d1e316">The update to the isoprene chemistry in CRI-Strat 2 increases OH over the
lowest 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in tropical forested regions by 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to
CRI-Strat, leading to an improvement in model–observation comparisons for
surface OH and isoprene relative to CRI-Strat and StratTrop. Enhanced
oxidants also cause a 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in isoprene burden and an increase in
oxidation fluxes of isoprene and other biogenic volatile organic compounds
(BVOCs) at low altitudes with likely impacts on subsequent aerosol formation, atmospheric
lifetime, and climate.</p>
    <?pagebreak page5240?><p id="d1e351">By contrast, updates to the rate constants of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with its main
reactants relative to CRI-Strat reduces OH in much of the free troposphere,
producing a 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in the methane lifetime, and increases the
tropospheric ozone burden by 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, primarily from reduced loss via
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The changes to inorganic nitrogen reaction rate
constants increase the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden by 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and shift the distribution
of nitrated species closer to that simulated by StratTrop.</p>
    <p id="d1e433">CRI-Strat 2 is suitable for multi-decadal model integrations and the
improved representation of isoprene chemistry provides an opportunity to
explore the consequences of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling in the United Kingdom Earth
System Model (UKESM1). This new mechanism will enable a re-evaluation of the
impact of BVOCs on the chemical composition of the atmosphere and further probe
the feedback between the biosphere and the climate.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e463">Isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene) makes up 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of all non-methane biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC)
emissions, with annual average emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">594</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
period 1980–2010 (Sindelarova et al., 2014). Isoprene's rapid chemical
oxidation in the atmosphere by OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> directly affects the
tropospheric oxidizing capacity, ozone burden, and the processing of other
trace gases like methane (e.g. Archibald et al., 2011; Khan et al., 2020),
while also serving as an important source of secondary organic aerosol (SOA)
(e.g. Scott et al., 2014; Kelly et al., 2018; Claeys and Maenhaut, 2021).
Thus, isoprene has substantial effects on the radiative balance of the
atmosphere, both directly via production of SOA and ozone and indirectly
via its changes to the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere, influencing
methane lifetime and production of other aerosol species, such as from
oxidation of monoterpenes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Unger et al., 2014; Makonnen et al.,
2012; Sporre et al., 2020). An accurate representation of isoprene chemistry
in climate models is essential to understanding the feedbacks between the
biosphere and the rest of the Earth system and thus capturing isoprene's
climatic impact.</p>
      <p id="d1e540">However, the treatment of isoprene in the chemistry schemes of many climate
models is outdated or oversimplified (e.g. Squire et al., 2015). The last
decade has seen significant advances in our understanding of the isoprene
oxidation pathway, principally the concept of rapid, intramolecular hydrogen
shifts (H-shifts), also termed isomerization reactions, in the isoprene
hydroxy peroxy radicals (frequently termed ISOPOO). Predictions from
theoretical work (Peeters et al., 2009; Peeters et al., 2014) and
observations (Crounse et al., 2011; Teng et al., 2017; Wennberg et al.,
2018) have established this pathway to be competitive with the traditional
bimolecular reactions of the peroxy radical with NO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in certain conditions such as low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
environments. These H-shift reactions lead to the production of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> either directly or indirectly following the
degradation of the isomerization products (e.g. Archibald et al., 2011;
Jenkin et al., 2015; Wennberg et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e645">This process, termed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling, has been shown to be important for
low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, high-isoprene regions of the atmosphere (Butler et al., 2008;
Lelieveld et al., 2008). By adding a simple, fixed-yield OH production
pathway from ISOPOO to represent OH production from hydroperoxy aldehydes
(HPALDs), Archibald et al. (2011) simulated an 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden, while the tropospheric OH burden increased by
17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the present day (PD) and by 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a pre-industrial (PI)
atmosphere featuring 1860 emissions of key chemical species such as
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and isoprene. Consequently, the lifetime of methane was
predicted to decrease by between 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in a future climate scenario) and
35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in the PI). This illustrated the significant impact that such a
process could have on our understanding of the PI atmosphere (and the
radiatively active components therein) and thus the PD–PI change and
climate sensitivity. While the greatest change to the chemistry was
simulated in the boundary layer (BL), convection of isoprene and its
oxidation products into the free troposphere resulted in this added
chemistry having global impacts.</p>
      <p id="d1e742">The effect on oxidants from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling influences the lifetimes of
isoprene and other BVOCs such as monoterpenes and thus the extent of their
dispersion and the location of the subsequent SOA formation. Karset et al. (2018) found that when lower oxidant fields were applied to the PI
atmosphere, isoprene, monoterpenes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and other key aerosol precursors
were more dispersed from their sources, reaching higher altitudes and
enhancing particle number concentration in the remote free troposphere. The
radiative impact of the resulting aerosols was greater due to their enhanced
lifetime (from slower deposition) and the highly non-linear relationship
between aerosol number and cloud forcing, where the addition of a given
concentration of aerosol has a much greater impact in remote regions where
the background concentration of aerosol is smaller (Chen et al., 2016). The
importance of oxidants to BVOCs and aerosol was also shown in Sporre et al. (2020) where models with an interactive oxidant scheme simulated a
BVOC-driven depletion of oxidants and attendant greater dispersion of BVOCs
and their oxidation products (including SOA precursors). In contrast, a
prescribed oxidant approach saw BVOC oxidation confined far more to source
regions, reducing dispersion.</p>
      <p id="d1e773">Changes in oxidant fields also perturb the oxidation pathways of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
the United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosols (UKCA) model, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
oxidized in the gas phase by OH (to yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or in the aqueous
phase by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mulcahy et al., 2020). This has
consequences for the aerosol mass and number distributions because only
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can nucleate new particles in UKCA; therefore, amplifying the
gas-phase pathway over the aqueous pathways leads to a greater number of
smaller aerosols. Thus, uneven changes to these pathways can alter the size
and number distribution of the aerosol population, affecting the radiative
properties of aerosols and clouds. Decreases in OH in other UKCA studies
(Weber et al., 2020a; O'Connor et al.,<?pagebreak page5241?> 2021)
have resulted in simulated
reductions in particle number concentration and cloud droplet number
concentration. The resulting negative cloud radiative forcing is smaller in
magnitude, as the lower cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) makes the
clouds less “bright” (Twomey, 1974). The impact of different
oxidant schemes on the burden and lifetime of dimethylsulfide (DMS), an important <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
precursor, and the impact on sulfate aerosol transport are both highlighted by
Mulcahy et al. (2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e874">While Archibald et al. (2011) used a relatively simple approach to simulate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling, further advances in the chemical understanding have led
to a near-explicit representation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling being incorporated
into comprehensive mechanisms, including the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM
v3.3.1) (Jenkin et al., 2015) and the CalTech isoprene scheme (Wennberg et al.,
2018). However, such mechanisms are far too large for use in global
chemistry–climate models.</p>
      <p id="d1e909">There exist a few reduced mechanisms featuring this state-of-the-art
isoprene chemistry suitable for use in chemistry–climate models, including
the CalTech reduced isoprene scheme (Bates et al., 2019), the MAGRITTE v1.1
model (Müller et al., 2019), the Mainz Organic Mechanism (Sander et al.,
2019), the updated ECHAM-MESSy (Novelli et al., 2020), and the Common
Representative Intermediates mechanism v2.2 (CRI v2.2) (Jenkin et al.,
2019a), the latter of which is the focus of this work. The CRI v2.2 is an update to the Common
Representative Intermediate v2.1 mechanism (Jenkin et al., 2008; Utembe et al., 2010;
Watson et al., 2008) and was developed from the fully explicit
Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) version 3.3.1 (Jenkin et al., 2015), which
describes the degradation of organic compounds in the troposphere. In the
CRI framework, species are lumped together into surrogate molecules whose
reactivity is optimized against the fully explicit MCM. A description of CRI
v2.2 is given in Jenkin et al. (2019a). The CRI v2.1, along with the
corresponding stratospheric chemistry, has already been incorporated into
UKCA as CRI-Start (CS) (Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021)
as an alternative to
the simpler but more widely used STRAT-TROP (ST) chemistry scheme (Archibald
et al., 2020a), the scheme used for UKESM's contributions to CMIP6 (e.g.
Sellar et al., 2020; Thornhill et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e912">Using the reduced Caltech Isoprene Mechanism, which includes H-shifts of
ISOPOO in GEOS-CHEM, Bates et al. (2019) simulated significant increases in
OH  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (up to 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the Amazon and
other forested tropical regions as a result of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling. After
implementing updated rate constants for isoprene H-shifts in GEOS-CHEM,
Møller et al. (2019) also found that globally around 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of all
isoprene peroxy radicals undergo at least one H-shift reaction, resulting in
an OH yield of 47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per isoprene molecule, and that adding all isoprene
H-shift reactions increased boundary layer OH by up to a factor of 3 in
the Amazon. Using CESM and CAM-CHEM and the MOZART-TS2 mechanism, Schwantes et al. (2020) showed reasonable agreement for some isoprene oxidation products
over the southeastern USA.</p>
      <p id="d1e985">Jenkin et al. (2019a), using CRI v2.2 in the STOCHEM Lagrangian
chemistry transport model, showed the significant influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
recycling in CRI v2.2 simulating a 6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in the tropospheric OH
burden relative to the CRI v2.1 and increases in surface OH of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
over much of the forested tropical regions. Khan et al. (2020), using the
same setup, also simulated enhanced surface OH and attendant decreases in
methane lifetime (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and isoprene burden (17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e1045">However, while the reduced mechanisms featuring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-recycling chemistry
have been tested in chemistry–climate models, less work has been done in
terms of multi-species comparison to observations and detailed analysis of
the effect to global atmospheric composition. This study introduces the CS2,
based on CRIv2.2 and expanded with stratospheric chemistry, as a mechanism
in UKCA, evaluates its performance against observational data, and compares
its output and key processes to the related CS mechanism and the
well-established ST mechanism. By providing a wide-ranging comparison to
observations and a detailed description of the changes CS2 causes in global
and regional atmospheric chemistry, this current work builds on the existing
literature to further develop our understanding of the consequences of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1084">Comparison of the CRI-STRAT and CRI-STRAT 2 chemical mechanisms.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="7cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="6.3cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CRI-STRAT (CS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CRI-STRAT 2 (CS2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tropospheric chemistry scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CRI v2.1 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Jenkin et al., 2008; Watson et al., 2008;  Utembe et al., 2010)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CRI v2.2 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Jenkin et al., 2019a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stratospheric chemistry scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stratospheric chemistry <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Morgenstern et al., 2009; Archibald et al., 2020)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Stratospheric chemistry <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Morgenstern et al., 2009; Archibald et al., 2020)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. of species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">219</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">228</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. of bimolecular reactions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">536</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">582</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. of termolecular reactions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. of photolysis reactions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">128</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">140</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1199">Species added and removed from the CS mechanism in the development
of the CRI-Strat 2 mechanism.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Added species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Species functionality</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MCM v3.3.1 equivalent</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HPUCARB12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hydroperoxy aldehyde (HPALD)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C5HPALD1, C5HPALD2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HUCARB9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Unsaturated hydroxy carbonyl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HMVK, HMAC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IEPOX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Isoprene epoxy diol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IEPOXA, IEPOXB, IEPOXC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HMML</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hydroxymethyl-methyl-a-lactone</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HMML</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DHPCARB9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dihydroperoxy carbonyl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DHPMEK, DHPMPAL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DHPR12OOH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Trihydroperoxy carbonyl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C536OOH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DHCARB9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dihydroxy carbonyl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HO12CO3C4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RU12NO3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hydroxy carbonyl nitrate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C57NO3, C58NO3, C58ANO3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RU10NO3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hydroxy carbonyl nitrate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MVKNO3, MACRNO3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DHPR12O2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dihydroperoxy carbonyl peroxy radical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C536O2, C537O2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MACO3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Unsaturated acyl peroxy radical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MACO3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RU10AO2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hydroxy carbonyl peroxy radical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MACRO2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Removed species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MCM v3.2 equivalent</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RU12PAN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PAN-type species with at least one hydroxy group</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C5PAN19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TNCARB11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Alkyl carbonyl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N/A</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TNCARB12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Alkyl carbonyl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N/A</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1427">Shorter runs performed for mechanism–observation comparisons.
Identical biogenic (2001–2010 MEGAN-MACC climatology; iBVOC for isoprene and
MT) and ocean (1990 time slice) emissions for each run unless otherwise stated.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="55mm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="55mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Run name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mechanisms tested</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Period(s)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Observational reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ATTO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ST, CS, CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">February 2013, Sept 2013, February 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Yáñez-Serrano et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ZF2 Brazil</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ST, CS, CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">June 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">See Sect. S4 in the Supplement</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Borneo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ST, CS, CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">April–May and June–July 2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hewitt et al. (2010), Whalley et al. (2011), Edwards et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GABRIEL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ST, CS, CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">October 2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Butler et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FAAM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ST, CS, CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">July 2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hewitt et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Isoprene Column</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ST, CS, CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">January, April, July, and October 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Wells et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">August–September 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Toon et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1583">Longer runs performed for CRI mechanism comparison. Identical
emissions for each run (anthropogenic and biomass time slice 2014, biogenic
2001–2010 MEGAN-MACC climatology, and oceanic 1990 time slice).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="8.5cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Base mechanism</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Total length and period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Alterations from base mechanism</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CRI-STRAT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spin up)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">None</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CRI-STRAT 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spin up)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">None</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CS2_O1D</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spin up)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Rate constants for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> set to values in CS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CS2_inorgN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spin up)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Rate constants for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, PAN formation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MeONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> set to values in CS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CS2_isoprene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spin up)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Isoprene chemistry set to that in CS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CS2_RO2_N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spin up)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Rate constants for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions reverted to CS values</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CS2_photo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spin up)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Photolysis of CARB3, HCHO, and EtCHO reverted to that from CS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(see Sect. S6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2021">Location, reference, time period, and species measured in
observational data sets and the corresponding modelling approach. For the ZF2
Brazil, ATTO, Borneo, GABRIEL, FAAM and SE4C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS data sets, model data
was filtered to select only the same days as observational data.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.87}[.87]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="3cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="2.8cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="20mm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="3.3cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="3.8cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="25mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dataset <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(location/<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>coordinates)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reference</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dates of <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>measurement</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Measurement details</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Species considered</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Corresponding model run (Table 3 unless stated)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ZF2 Brazil field <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>campaign, Amazon <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60.21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NNW of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Manaus)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">See Sect. S4 in the <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Supplement</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22 June 2016–5 July 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interval measurements at <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above ground (above tree canopy)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, isoprene, monoterpenes, benzene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">ZF2 Brazil</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Instant ATTO<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>tower, Amazon <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>59.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NE of Manaus)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Yáñez-Serrano et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">February 2013, September 2013, and <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>February 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interval measurements at multiple heights above ground (0.05, 0.5, 4, 12, 25, 38, 53 and 79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Isoprene, monoterpenes,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>methyl vinyl ketone (MVK), <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>methacrolein (MACR), <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>isoprene hydroperoxide <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(ISOPOOH), acetone  <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(All PTRMS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">ATTO</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GAW station, Borneo <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(5.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,  117.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hewitt et al. (2010), Whalley et al. (2011), Edwards et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">April–July 2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (both FAGE), <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Thermo Environmental Instruments 49C UV absorption instrument)  isoprene, monoterpene (both PTRMS), HCHO (Aerolaser Hantzsch), CO (Aerolaser AL5002), MeCHO, acetone MACR, MVK (both GC-FID), PAN (GC-MS), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Thermo environmental instruments 42C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Borneo</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GABRIEL aircraft <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>campaign (Suriname,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Guyana, and<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>French Guiana)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Butler et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">October 2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Daytime aircraft measurements sampling<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO  (both ECOEX), <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>HCHO, CO  (both MPIC<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>TRISTAR), acetone,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>isoprene, MACR, MVK<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(all PTRMS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GABRIEL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FAAM aircraft <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>campaign, Borneo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hewitt et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">July 2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Daytime aircraft measurements sampling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (TECO 49), isoprene<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(PTRMS), <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>CO (AERO AL5002)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">FAAM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE4C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS flight campaign (Southeast US)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Toon et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">August–September <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Daytime aircraft measurements sampling up to <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ERSL), CO (DACOM), Isoprene (WAS), ISOPOOH, HPALDs, IEPOX, isoprene nitrate (all CIT)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global isoprene <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>columns</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wells et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">January, April,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>July, and<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>October 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Global monthly mean isoprene column values</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Isoprene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Isoprene column</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Development of CS2  –  incorporation of CRI v2.2 into UKCA</title>
      <p id="d1e2635">It is important to note that the CRI v2.2 mechanism, like the CRI v2.1
mechanism, is strictly a tropospheric chemistry scheme. In developing the
whole atmosphere mechanism CS, Archer-Nicholls et al. (2021) merged the CRI
v2.1 mechanism with the stratospheric chemistry scheme (Morgenstern et al.,
2009) in UKCA (Table 1) to allow this scheme to be used within UKESM1
(Sellar et al., 2019). The same approach was taken in this work with the
stratospheric scheme unchanged and tropospheric scheme switched from CRI
v2.1 to CRI v2.2. Therefore, to differentiate the “CRI v2.2” mechanism
used in UKCA in this work from the solely tropospheric CRI v2.2 mechanism
described on the CRI v2.2 website (<uri>http://cri.york.ac.uk/</uri>, last access: 10 July 2021), the
UKCA mechanism will henceforth be referred to as CRI-Strat 2 (CS2) (Table 1). A full description of the changes made to CS to update it to CS2 is
given Sect. 1.1 in the Supplement, and a summary of the changes will now be
discussed.</p>
      <p id="d1e2641">CS2 features a significant update to isoprene oxidation chemistry relative
to CS with the incorporation of 1,6 and 1,4 H-shift reactions of isoprene
peroxy radicals and an update to the organonitrate scheme (as
detailed in Jenkin et al., 2019a). To the best of our understanding, CS2 also features updates to multiple
reaction rate constants (which were out<?pagebreak page5242?> of date in CS, Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021), as documented in the IUPAC Task
Group on Atmospheric Chemical Kinetic Data Evaluation (<uri>http://iupac.pole-ether.fr/</uri>, last access: 9 April 2021). Changes were implemented to the rate constants of the
reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; rate constants
of multiple inorganic nitrogen reactions such as those forming
species with the peroxy acyl nitrate moiety, termed PAN-type, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction and the rate constants of
organic peroxy radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These updates
ensure consistency between the CS2 mechanism incorporated in UKCA and that
described on the CRI v2.2 website (<uri>http://cri.york.ac.uk/</uri>, last access: 10 July 2021). The photolysis
of glyoxal, formaldehyde, and propionaldehyde was also updated (see Sect. S6 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e2753">CS2 has 9 more species than CS (Tables 1, 2) as well as 46 additional
bimolecular reactions, 12 additional photolysis reactions, and 8 additional
unimolecular and termolecular reactions (Table 1). This leads to a modest increase in
runtime (6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared with CS, whose runtime was already <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than ST. Incorporation of CS2 into UKCA involved extensive
use of the UM-UKCA virtual machine environment (Abraham et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e2782">The main update to the isoprene chemistry is the inclusion of 1,6 and 1,4
H-shift reactions of the isoprene peroxy radical (termed RU14O2 in CRI
nomenclature). The 1,6 H-shift process is well studied (Peeters et al.,
2009; Crounse et al., 2011; Teng et al., 2017; Wennberg et al., 2018) and
follows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bulk1,6H</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate coefficient described in Jenkin et al. (2019a), capturing the dependence of isomerization on both temperature and
the rates of reaction of RU14O2 with the standard bimolecular partners (NO,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This pathway yields hydroperoxy aldehydes
(HPALDs, termed HPUCARB12 in CS2) and dihydroperoxy carbonyls peroxy
radicals (DHPR12O2). The photolysis of the highly photolabile HPALD
(HPUCARB12) and its product HUCARB9 (unsaturated hydroxy carbonyl) are key
routes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> regeneration.</p>
      <p id="d1e2846">The production of the isoprene epoxy diol (IEPOX) from the isoprene
hydroperoxide (RU14OOH) and the hydroxymethyl-methyl-a-lactone (HMML) also
represent important updates (Jenkin et al., 2019a). IEPOX and HMML are known
SOA precursors (Nguyen et al., 2014, 2017;
Allan et al., 2014),
and thus their addition may enable a more<?pagebreak page5243?> explicit representation of SOA
formation within the CRI framework, as opposed to the current framework
whereby SOA formation is represented by the condensation on existing aerosol
of a single inert tracer, Sec_Org, which is made from
monoterpene oxidation (Mann et al., 2010; Mulcahy et al., 2020). This is
beyond the scope of this paper but will be a focus of future work.</p>
      <p id="d1e2849">The introduction of HPUCARB12 and HUCARB9 necessitates a careful update to
the FASTJX photolysis scheme used by UKCA (Telford et al., 2013). The
cross-sectional dependence of wavelength for HPALDs is assumed to be the
same as methacrolein (Peeters et al., 2009; Wennberg et al., 2018; Schwantes
et al., 2020) but with a significantly larger quantum yield (QY). Prather (2015) recommends a QY of 0.003 for methacrolein, and Liu et al. (2017) recommends a
QY of 0.55 for HPALDs (both used by Wennberg et al., 2018). To implement the
photolysis of these new species, the photolysis frequency of HPUCARB12 was
taken to be the photolysis frequency for methacrolein scaled by the ratio of
the QY of HPALDs to the QY of methacrolein, the same approach used by
Schwantes et al. (2020) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-HPALDs. A scaling of 0.5 was applied to
the photolysis frequency of HUCARB9 in agreement with the MCM v3.3.1.</p>
      <p id="d1e2859">In addition to the updates to isoprene chemistry, CRIv2.2 has had the rate
coefficients for many organic and inorganic reactions updated to bring the
mechanism into agreement with the MCM v3.3.1 and IUPAC. These affect the
overall chemistry in three major ways. The first involves the major
reactions of the excited oxygen radical, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The rate constants of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, to bring them into agreement with the current IUPAC
values (<uri>http://iupac.pole-ether.fr</uri>, last access: 9 April 2021). This also means the rate constant of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> became much closer (within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to that
used in ST (Archibald et al., 2020a) and that rate constants for the reactions
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also move closer to those used by ST. The result
of this is a reduction in the fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacting with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
by 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus lowering OH production while also reducing O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss
via this pathway.</p>
      <p id="d1e3107">The second involves multiple inorganic reactions of nitrated species. The
formation rate constants for PAN-type species (species with peroxyacyl
nitrate functionality), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
changed by around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
troposphere, respectively. The change for PAN brought its formation rate
constant much closer to that used in ST (within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and this was
also the case for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. The rate
constant of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the single biggest production source of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, decreased by 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5244?><p id="d1e3303">Finally, the rate constants for most <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions have been changed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
while maintaining the same temperature dependence. This is likely to have a
smaller impact than the other chemistry changes but at the margins will
make reactions with NO more competitive with the isomerization reactions of
the ISOPOO.</p>
      <p id="d1e3374">The implementation of CRI v2.2 by Khan et al. (2020) in the STOCHEM model, while
including the updates to isoprene chemistry and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions, did not feature updates to the rate
constants for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or the inorganic
nitrogen reactions. Therefore, even in low-altitude terrestrial conditions
where isoprene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling tends to dominate the change in OH,
comparison between Khan et al. (2020) and the results of this work must be
caveated with the changes to the inorganic chemistry.</p>
      <p id="d1e3484">In addition to the chemistry changes, updates are made to the photolysis of
several species. Two additional photolysis reactions of glyoxal (CARB3 in
the CRI mechanisms) were added in addition to updates to the photolysis
parameters for HCHO and EtCHO (propionaldehyde). The wavelength bins of the
product of the cross section and quantum yield used by FAST-JX (Telford et al.,
2013) were updated to the v7.3 values from Prather (2015) for
HCHO and EtCHO. The photolysis of CARB3, which had previously
been estimated in<?pagebreak page5245?> CS by a scaling of HCHO photolysis (Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021), is replaced with the glyoxal photolysis for 999 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from v7.3 of
Prather (2015). This reaction does exhibit a modest pressure
dependence, but this has not been incorporated into FAST-JX at the
current time.</p>
      <p id="d1e3495">In addition to the changes to the chemistry and photolysis, updates to the
wet deposition scheme were implemented to both CS and CS2 schemes. The
previous approach of applying parameters for a standard surrogate for other
species with the same functional groups (e.g. EtOOH was used for most
hydroperoxides), as described in Archer-Nicholls et al. (2021), was updated
to use either data for the precise species (taken from Schwantes et al.,
2020) or a more closely related surrogate. The changes to the wet deposition
parameters are detailed in Table S1 in the Supplement. As they were
applied to both CS and CS2 mechanisms, they are unlikely to have a
significant influence on the inter-mechanism difference. No changes were
made to the dry deposition scheme in this work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Model runs</title>
      <p id="d1e3506">All model runs were performed using the United Kingdom Chemistry and
Aerosols Model (UKCA), run at a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.875</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with 85 vertical levels up to 85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Walters et al., 2019),
and the GLOMAP-mode aerosol scheme, which simulates sulfate, sea
salt, BC, organic matter, and dust but does not simulate currently nitrate aerosol
(Mulcahy et al., 2020). In this setup, the inert chemical tracer
Sec_Org, which condenses irreversibly onto existing aerosol,
was produced at a 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yield solely from reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the enhanced yield applied to
account for a lack of SOA formation from isoprene or anthropogenic species
(Mulcahy et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e3582">The runs in this work fell into two distinct categories. Firstly, short runs
(generally 1–2 months, Table 3) with higher-frequency (hourly) output using
the ST, CS, and CS2 chemical mechanisms were performed to evaluate each
mechanism's performance against the observational data. Secondly, longer
runs (2–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 4) with monthly output using the CS and CS2 chemical
mechanisms (or variants of CS2 for sensitivity tests) were conducted to
facilitate a rigorous comparison of the global chemical composition (Table 4).</p>
      <p id="d1e3593">Temperature and horizontal wind fields were nudged (Telford et al., 2013)
in
all model runs to atmospheric reanalyses from ECMWF (Dee et al., 2011)
to
constrain the simulations to consistent meteorology, thus preventing
diverging meteorology from adding to the differences resulting from the chemical
mechanisms and replicating the atmospheric conditions
experienced when the observations were recorded as closely as possible. Nudging only occurred above
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in altitude, and thus the majority of the planetary
boundary layer was not nudged. The model runs were atmosphere-only runs with
prescribed sea surface temperatures (SSTs). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not emitted but set
to a constant field, while methane, CFCs, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are prescribed with
constant lower boundary conditions, all at 2014 levels (Archibald et al.,
2020a).</p>
      <p id="d1e3638">The emissions used in this study are the same as those from Archer-Nicholls
et al. (2021) and are those developed for the Coupled-Model Intercomparison
Project 6 (CMIP6) (Collins et al., 2017).
Anthropogenic and biomass burning
emissions data for CMIP6 are from the Community Emissions Data System
(CEDS), as described by Hoesly et al. (2018). For the short runs, time series
anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions were used for all ST runs and
all CRI runs up to 2015. For the runs done for the purpose of comparison to the observational
date recorded at the ZF2 site near Manaus in 2016 (see Tables 3, 5),
time slice 2014 emissions were used due to a lack of post-2015 CRI emissions, but the impact of the difference is expected to be minimal.</p>
      <p id="d1e3642">All longer runs used time slice 2014 emissions for anthropogenic and biomass
burning emissions. Oceanic emissions were from the POET 1990 data set
(Olivier et al., 2003), and all biogenic emissions except isoprene and
monoterpenes (see Sect. 3.3) were based on 2001–2010 climatologies from
Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature under the Monitoring
Atmospheric Composition and Climate project (MEGAN-MACC) (MEGAN) version 2.1
(Guenther et al., 2012) and are discussed further in Sect. 3.3. A full
description of the emission sources for each emitted species is given in
Table S2 in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e3645">All mechanisms used the same raw emissions data. However, the additional
emitted species required by CS and CS2 means the total mass of emitted
organic compounds is greater in CS and CS2, and the lumping of species for
emissions is also different. The approach and consequences are discussed in
Archer-Nicholls et al. (2021).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Short runs for model–observation comparisons</title>
      <p id="d1e3655">The runs performed for comparison to observations are detailed in Table 3
and correspond to an observational data set described in Sect. 4 and Table 5. All runs were spun up for a minimum of 3 months. For most of the
runs, hourly model output was used so as to allow for detailed comparison
with observations. The only exceptions were the runs performed for the
comparison to the isoprene column data (“isoprene column” Table 3) for which
monthly means were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Longer runs for mechanistic intercomparison</title>
      <p id="d1e3666">The longer runs (Table 4) were designed with the primary aim of examining
the consequences of the mechanism changes between CS and CS2 and followed an
approach similar to that used by Archer-Nicholls et al. (2021). These runs
also served a secondary purpose as they enabled longer-term<?pagebreak page5246?> comparisons to
observations for several species. We ran two 5-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nudged runs (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
spin up, 4-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis) with the CS and CS2 mechanisms. In addition, five
2-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity runs (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spin up, 1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis) were performed to
analyse the impact of the individual changes to the isoprene scheme,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions, inorganic nitrogen reactions,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions, and photolysis reactions, as discussed
in Sect. 2. These sensitivity tests featured mechanisms based on the CS2
mechanism, but each had a different feature that was reverted to that found
in CS.</p>
      <p id="d1e3757">CS2_O1D used the old rate constants from CS for the reaction
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. CS2_inorgN
used the rate constants from CS for the formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, PANs, HONO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as for the reactions
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MeONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PAN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MPAN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3920">CS2_isoprene followed the isoprene
reactions from CS as closely as possible, with the major change being the omission of the
isomerization reactions of RU14O2 and subsequent production of HPALDs and
other species that are key for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling.</p>
      <p id="d1e3939">In CS2_RO2_N, the rate constants for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions were reverted to those
used in CS, which led to a 12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease and 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase, respectively,
for the vast majority of these reactions. Where branching ratios changed
between CS and CS2, the CS2 branching ratios were maintained and the rate
constants scaled accordingly.</p>
      <p id="d1e3996">Finally, CS2_photo used the parameters and reactions from CS
for the photolysis of CARB3 (glyoxal), HCHO, and EtCHO and was performed to
evaluate the impact of update to photolysis (see Sect. S6 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e3999">Each sensitivity test, when compared to the CS2 run, provides information as
to the impact of the change of the respective section of the mechanism (when
taken in isolation); for example, the impact of the changes to the rate
coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s reactions is examined by comparing the CS2 and
CS2_O1D runs.</p>
      <p id="d1e4019">A full description of the changes to reactions and rate constants for each
sensitivity test is given Sect. S2 in the Supplement. The changes to the
photolysis were found to have a minimal effect on atmospheric composition
compared with the other sensitivity tests and are described in their entirety in the
Supplement. The analysis of the longer runs is discussed in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Biogenic emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e4030">This work used the interactive biogenic volatile organic compound (iBVOC)
emissions system (Pacifico et al.. 2012) for isoprene and monoterpenes, which is the
standard approach for UKESM's contributions to CMIP6 (Sellar et al., 2019).
Emissions of isoprene and monoterpenes are calculated interactively based on
temperature, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and plant functional
type for each grid cell. While a diel cycle for isoprene is standard in
UKESM, iBVOC has the advantage of also simulating a diel cycle of emissions
for monoterpenes, leading to improved model performance relative to
observation (see Sect. 4). The dependence on temperature and PAR means
that emissions of BVOCs differ slightly between runs and thus between
mechanisms. However, nudging considerably inhibits divergence of surface
temperature between comparative runs, and thus the differences between
emissions were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and typically 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, significantly smaller
than the differences caused by the mechanisms.</p>
      <p id="d1e4067">Monoterpene emissions were speciated in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
ratio as used in Archer-Nicholls et al. (2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e4103">There are temporal and spatial disparities between using iBVOC emissions and
offline emissions, such as the MEGAN-MACC data set (Sindelarova et al.,
2014, as used by Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021), which could affect
conclusions about mechanism observational biases. These differences are
discussed in more detail in Sect. S3 in the Supplement. In short, for the ZF2 Brazil,
ATTO, and Borneo sites for the periods considered, the isoprene and monoterpene (MT)
emissions were higher when using the iBVOC approach than for MEGAN-MACC
(Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Comparison with observations</title>
      <p id="d1e4116">The shorter UKCA models runs listed in Table 3 were used to evaluate
mechanism performance against six high frequency observational data sets (three
surface or near-surface data sets and three aircraft campaigns) from the Amazon, Borneo, and
the southeastern USA, all important regions for BVOC production. In addition,
satellite-derived isoprene columns (Wells et al., 2020) were compared to
model output (Isoprene Column, Table 3). Monthly mean data from the longer
CS and CS2 runs (Table 4) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were also compared
to a range of observational data. A summary of the observation data sets is
given in Table 5, and locations of the surface and airborne campaigns are shown
in Fig. S3 in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e4141">Diel profiles for multiple species were calculated from the three
surface and near-surface sites, and the vertical profiles were calculated from
the ATTO site.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5247?><p id="d1e4144">The three flight campaigns considered were the October 2005 Amazon GABRIEL
campaign (Butler et al., 2008), the July 2008 Borneo Facility for Airborne
Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) (Hewitt et al., 2010), and the Studies of
Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by
Regional Surveys (SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS) flight campaign over the southeastern USA in
August–September 2013 (Toon et al., 2016). Hourly model output
corresponding to the days and times of the flights was used for the
mechanism–observation comparison for each campaign. Model and observational
data were binned into 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude bins and median values for the
variables of interest across the whole region for a given altitude bin were
considered. For the SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS comparison, observational data were also
filtered to exclude urban plumes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), fire plumes
(acetonitrile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and stratospheric air (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while missing data were not used, and data flagged as a lower limit of detection
were set to zero as previously done in Schwantes et al. (2020). Estimated limits of
detection are shown for relevant species for the GABRIEL and FAAM campaigns.</p>
      <p id="d1e4244">The performance of each mechanism is now described for the key species, e.g.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, isoprene, certain isoprene oxidation products, and
monoterpenes. A brief commentary about other species including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CO, PAN, HCHO, MeCHO, EtCHO, and acetone is given in the Supplement.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e4288">Mean diel cycles of observed and modelled OH (top row), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(second row), isoprene (third row), and MT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-pinene</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-pinene</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the CRI mechanisms) (fourth row) at the three
surface and near-surface sites considered. The bottom row shows the vertical
profile of the ratio of the isoprene oxidation products MVK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MACR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ISOPOOH
to isoprene for daytime (09:00–15:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nighttime (21:00–03:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) periods
and the diel profile of the ratio at 53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (all from ATTO tower). Shading
indicates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation from the mean, and the numbers in bold
show the mean diel model bias (model–observations) for species or locations
where observations were recorded.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4379">Median observed and model concentrations for the GABRIEL campaign
in the Amazon for <bold>(a)</bold> isoprene, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> CO, and <bold>(d)</bold> the ratio of the
isoprene oxidation products MVK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MACR to isoprene. Median observed and
model concentrations for the FAAM campaign over Borneo for <bold>(e)</bold> isoprene, <bold>(f)</bold>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(g)</bold> CO. Median observed and model concentrations for the
SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS campaign over the southeastern USA for <bold>(h)</bold> isoprene, <bold>(i)</bold> isoprene
hydroperoxide (ISOPOOH), <bold>(j)</bold> the isoprene epoxy diol (IEPOX), and <bold>(k)</bold>
hydroperoxy aldehydes (HPALDs). SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS observational data are also
filtered to exclude urban plumes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), fire plumes
(acetonitrile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and stratospheric air (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as previously done in Schwantes et al. (2020). Shading shows inter-quartile range,
dotted black lines <bold>(a, e)</bold> show estimated limits of detection for isoprene,
and J<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>HPALD</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HPALD</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lines in <bold>(k)</bold> show results of the
scaling the HPALD photolysis frequency by 3 and 0.5, respectively. Note the
logarithmic horizontal scale for <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Ozone</title>
      <p id="d1e4579">CS2 exhibits a modest increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over CS
at all surface sites (Fig. 1),
exacerbating the existing high surface bias
of CS, whose drivers were discussed in Archer-Nicholls et al. (2021), and the
smaller high bias of ST. On a diel basis, the mechanisms are able to
replicate the shape of the diel cycle at the ZF2 site (with similar diel
profiles at the ATTO site) but perform less well in Borneo, simulating
pronounced diel cycles with a high bias compared to much more muted cycles
from observation.</p>
      <p id="d1e4611">An increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to CS is also exhibited by
CS2 for monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when both mechanisms are compared to
observational data at 10 locations from pole to pole at four pressure levels
(250, 500, 750, and 900 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. S4 in the Supplement). CS2 reduces the low bias in polar
regions but increases the CS's high bias in the tropics and eastern US.</p>
      <p id="d1e4651">Model high biases are also observed from flight data comparisons (Figs. 2b,f, and S6a in the Supplement). In the Amazon, where the observed and modelled NO vertical
profiles agree well (Fig. S6e in the Supplement), there is little difference between the
three mechanisms. Each exhibits the greatest high bias at low and a smaller
high bias in the free troposphere. CS2 exhibits a high bias of 15–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
the SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS campaign (Fig. S6d in the Supplement), with perhaps some influence from
the low-altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model high bias. In Borneo, all mechanisms exhibit
a roughly consistent high bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for ST, increasing
to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for CS2. Interestingly, all the mechanisms simulate a significant
low bias for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S6f in the Supplement), which may indicate biomass burning events
which are not simulated, something which might be expected to promote higher
ozone concentrations.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{HO}${}_{{x}}$}?><title>HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e4738">Modelled surface OH increases in all locations from ST through CS to CS2,
with a significant increase in midday OH from CS to CS2 (Fig. 1). In Borneo,
OH is consistently biased low in the three mechanisms, but the best
comparison is exhibited by CS2 where the mean diel bias compared to ST and
CS decreases by 43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, over the period
considered. The drivers of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> change are explored further in
Sect. 5.</p>
      <p id="d1e4789">Surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also simulated to increase in all locations from ST to
CS to CS2. Significant high bias was simulated in Borneo (the only
observational data set) (Fig. S7 in the Supplement) for the CRI mechanisms, including at night.
The simulated ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to OH is highly biased in all mechanisms.
However, it is best simulated in CS2, indicating that the increase in OH is
much larger than that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It should be noted that none of the
mechanisms at present include the heterogenous reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
their inclusion, which will be addressed in future work, should reduce the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> high bias.</p>
      <p id="d1e4847">The comparison of modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to observation is complicated by large
discrepancies in key reaction partners. Relative to observed
values of 100–130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO in ST in Borneo is highly biased by 13 and 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while CO in the CRI mechanisms exhibits larger biases of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–50 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during April–May and June–July,
respectively (Fig. S7). These high biases would enhance modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
the expense of OH, potentially explaining the modelled low biases in OH.
Indeed, the OH model low bias is greater in the June–July period. This
highlights the complexity of model–observation comparisons: the CRI
mechanisms may well simulate secondary CO production from isoprene more
accurately than ST but other model biases, for example in emissions of CO,
NO, and isoprene, can lead to the CRI mechanisms appearing worse.
Nevertheless, if the CO high bias is reduced in future, we might reasonably
assume that the modelled OH will improve still further.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Isoprene</title>
      <p id="d1e4930">Modelled isoprene from all three mechanisms was compared to surface
observations, flight campaign data, and isoprene columns measured by
satellite.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>4.3.1</label><title>Isoprene surface measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e4940">CS2 yields the best model–observation comparison for surface isoprene on a
daily basis in all locations (Fig. 1k–o). CS2 reduces the high bias in
the diel profiles by 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to ST and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to CS at the
ZF2, ATTO, and Borneo sites, driven by the elevated OH concentrations</p>
      <p id="d1e4975">In most locations the model simulates, to a greater or less extent, a “twin
peak” isoprene profile with a sharp rise around 07:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a second,
smaller peak at 19:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This was<?pagebreak page5248?> most pronounced in the Amazon dry season
(ATTO Sept 2013). The morning peak is likely to be due to a combination of
the sharp rise in simulated isoprene emissions which starts at 06:00–07:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, outweighing the concurrent rise in OH, and an underestimation in the
model of the rate of BL height growth, which can trap isoprene close to the
surface, causing a buildup. By contrast, observed isoprene concentrations
exhibit a much slower morning growth, reaching a peak in early afternoon.
While the “out-of-phase” nature of the profiles is unlikely to be the sole
driver of model–observation difference, it will play a role since isoprene
chemistry occurs on the timescale of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
atmospheric oxidizing capacity varies throughout the day.</p>
      <p id="d1e5020">Over the lowest 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the ATTO site, all mechanisms are biased high in the
daytime (09:00–15:00) and nighttime (21:00–03:00) (Fig. S8a–d in the Supplement), with CS2
exhibiting the smallest bias, but produce similar isoprene vertical gradients
to observations. The effect of boundary layer height was further considered
by looking separately at the periods 06:00–08:00 and 17:00–19:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S8e–h in the<?pagebreak page5249?> Supplement). In contrast to the daytime and nighttime periods, during the
06:00–08:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> period the simulated isoprene gradient is significantly more
negative than the observation, indicating less vertical mixing, and similar
results are seen with the MT profile (Fig. S8m–p in the Supplement). This is most
noticeable in September where the largest morning peak is seen in the diel
profile for both species and lends support to the theory that the simulated
BL height is not increasing as quickly as in reality, leading to more
isoprene and MT being trapped at low altitude. Smaller differences between
observed and simulated isoprene and MT vertical gradients are seen during
17:00–19:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, coinciding with smaller evening peaks in the diel profiles.
This suggests the reduction in BL height is more accurately simulated than
the morning increase.</p>
      <p id="d1e5055">The major drivers of the remaining model–observation difference are likely
to be the concentrations of oxidants (despite the increases seen in CS2, OH
remains low biased in Borneo) and the emissions of isoprene (including the
modelled vs. actual diel cycle). The concentrations of isoprene and other
species also vary significantly through and above the tree canopy, as shown
by the ATTO measurements (Fig. S8), and the global model resolution is not
high enough to resolve the vertical gradient of species in the canopy. When
testing the CRI v2.2 in STOCHEM-CRI with isoprene emissions from the
MEGAN-MACC inventory, Khan et al. (2020) noted that halving the isoprene
emissions reduced the model–observation disagreement significantly and
attributed the model high bias in their work to high biases in the emissions
of isoprene.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>4.3.2</label><title>Isoprene flight measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e5066">Model–observation comparisons of isoprene vertical profiles extending into
the boundary layer and into the free<?pagebreak page5250?> troposphere reveal quite a different
story from the surface analysis (Fig. 2a, e, and h).</p>
      <p id="d1e5069">Despite being biased high at the surface and at low altitude, simulated
isoprene vertical profiles over the Amazon and Borneo rapidly show a low
bias as altitude increases. There are likely two reasons for this. The first
is the vertical mixing, already discussed in relation to the isoprene and MT
surface diel cycles. Secondly, for the Amazon and Borneo campaigns only
estimated detection limits (0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both cases) could be used. This has
the effect of biassing the median of the observational data to higher values
as very low values are ignored. In the SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS campaign, all data
points flagged as below the detection limit were set to zero, mitigating
this issue. The enhanced oxidative capacity of CS2 at low altitude results
in the lowest simulated vertical concentrations among the three mechanisms,
but the general low bias above the surface is an issue faced by all
mechanisms, suggesting it is not just down to modelling of the chemistry.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e5091">Monthly mean isoprene column values from the global isoprene
column observational data set (Wells et al., 2020) for <bold>(a)</bold> January, <bold>(b)</bold>
April, <bold>(c)</bold> July, and <bold>(d)</bold> October 2013. Model bias (model–observation) using
<bold>(d–h)</bold> ST, <bold>(i–l)</bold> CS, and <bold>(m–p)</bold> CS2. Numbers in <bold>(a–d)</bold> show the area-weighted mean
model column values and in <bold>(e–p)</bold> show the model bias for individual terrestrial
regions (the number in the North Atlantic refers to Europe and that in the South Atlantic refers to
Africa).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5131">Annual mean tropospheric zonal <bold>(a, b)</bold> and lowest 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c, d)</bold>
change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio (CS2 / CS). Purple line in the zonal mean shows the
average height of the tropopause.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>4.3.3</label><title>Isoprene columns</title>
      <p id="d1e5173">To consider isoprene on a global scale, monthly modelled isoprene columns
for all mechanisms are compared to satellite observations from January,
April, July, and October 2013 (Wells et al., 2020) (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p id="d1e5176">Significant variation in model bias is exhibited between the mechanisms with
ST exhibiting the highest isoprene columns and CS2 the lowest. In South
America, CS2 exhibits the smallest bias, while the ST columns are over double
the observed values for April and July. CS and CS2 exhibit the smallest
biases in Africa and Southeast Asia, respectively. The low biases in North
America (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
Europe (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
Central Asia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are quite consistent across the mechanisms and are in some cases
almost equal in magnitude to the observed columns, which suggests the bias
is driven more by insufficient emissions rather than the chemistry scheme in
these locations.</p>
      <p id="d1e5312">CS and CS2 yield lower isoprene columns and generally smaller model biases
than ST. This comparison highlights the significant influence of the
different chemistry schemes on the simulated isoprene column and thus the
considerable challenges of determining isoprene emissions via top-down
approaches using back-calculation from observed concentrations or column
values: different chemistry schemes will lead to different emission
estimates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Isoprene oxidation products</title>
      <p id="d1e5325">During the GABRIEL flight campaign, the major isoprene oxidation products
MACR and MVK were measured via PTRMS. At the ATTO tower, isoprene oxidation
products were also measured via PTRMS but in this case were defined as the
sum of MACR, MVK, and ISOPOOH (Yáñez-Serrano et al., 2015) and to avoid
confusion we refer explicitly to the isoprene oxidation products as either
MVK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MACR (for Gabriel) or MVK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MACR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ISOPOOH (ATTO). In each case,
the observational data are compared with model data.</p>
      <p id="d1e5349">At the ATTO site, all mechanisms are largely biased high for
MVK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MACR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ISOPOOH, but CS2 produces the best comparison to observations
for both diel and vertical profiles (Fig. 1 and Figs. S9 and S11 in the Supplement). CS2 also yields the
smallest high bias for the ratio of MVK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MACR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ISOPOOH to isoprene (a
metric less sensitive to discrepancies between actual and modelled isoprene
emissions) in the Amazon (Figs. 1, S9, 11). Despite the greater oxidizing
capacity of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) in the CS2 simulations, the MVK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MACR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ISOPOOH
concentrations are lower. This is attributed to the fact that in the
relatively low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> environment around the ATTO tower, the isomerization
reactions of the isoprene peroxy radical are particularly important and
favour the production of HPALDs and other species over MACR, MVK, and
ISOPOOH.</p>
      <p id="d1e5404">Relative to the GABRIEL flight data (Fig. 2d), the ratio of MVK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MACR to
isoprene is biased high in all mechanisms, albeit with the CRI mechanisms
exhibiting a smaller bias than ST.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Isoprene nitrate, IEPOX, and HPALDs</title>
      <p id="d1e5422">The isoprene oxidation products HPALDs and IEPOX, unique to the CS2
mechanism in this study, are compared, along with isoprene, ISOPOOH, and
isoprene nitrate (Fig. S6), to observational data from the SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS
campaign over the southeastern USA. Modelled isoprene (Fig. 2h) exhibits a
significant low bias, in line with the isoprene column analysis (Fig. 3), and
is attributed to insufficient emissions. Unsurprisingly, ISOPOOH (Fig. 2i),
isoprene nitrate (Fig. S4c), and HPALDs (Fig. 2j) are also biased low. However, IEPOX (Fig. 2j) compares favourably to observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e5434">The apparent good performance of IEPOX, despite the significant low biases
of isoprene and its direct precursor ISOPOOH, is likely to be due to a
missing sink to the aerosol phase. IEPOX is readily lost to aerosol by
reactive uptake (Nguyen et al., 2014, 2015; Allan et al.,
2014); a process featured in Schwantes et al. (2020) (who simulated lower
IEPOX concentrations) but not in UKCA. The rate constant for IEPOX's
production from ISOPOOH is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than that used by a
mechanism of similar complexity, MOZART TS2 (Schwantes et al., 2020), while
IEPOX's loss via OH has a similar rate constant to MOZART TS2. Including
reactive uptake of IEPOX in future updates may reduce this high bias. The
processing of IEPOX is unlikely to affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling as much as
HPALDs; however, its importance to SOA formation means it will be a focus of
future work.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5251?><p id="d1e5471">The low bias of HPALDs, also simulated to a lesser extent in Schwantes et al. (2020), who used isoprene emissions from the MEGAN v2.1, is important given
its role in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling via photolysis. There remains uncertainty in
HPALD photolysis frequencies. In this work simulated HPALD destruction is
dominated by reaction with OH and photolysis, which are roughly equal
ascending to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereupon OH's importance grows rapidly at the expense
of photolysis. To test the impact of photolysis uncertainty on the bias, two
further runs were performed with the photolysis frequency of HPALDs scaled
by 0.5 and 3, respectively. These tests change HPALD concentrations in the
lowest 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2k), respectively, suggesting
concentration of HPALDs is dependent on the photolysis frequency of HPALDs,
which is not currently well constrained.</p>
      <p id="d1e5537">Interestingly, these scaling tests only change low-altitude OH by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the southeastern USA, suggesting the uncertainty in
HPALD photolysis from the current approach may not have a huge impact on
oxidants in this region, although this may in part be due to the modelled
isoprene and HPALD low biases (Fig. 2h, k). Furthermore, the fact that the
modelled photolysis frequency of methacrolein here is low biased by a factor
of 2.5–3 (not shown) suggests that if further changes to the HPALD
frequency are made in future, any potential reductions in methacrolein
frequency should be scrutinized carefully. Nevertheless, constraining HPALD
photolysis further will be a key focus of future work. A lack of OH
measurements prevents attempts to constrain the OH loss pathway.</p>
      <p id="d1e5563">Evaluating HPALD production is also challenging since observations of ISOPO2
were not measured. Over the relevant temperatures, the rate constant for
HPALD production in CS2 is 6–14 times greater than the equivalent used by
Schwantes et al. (2020), which would, if anything, make a low bias less
likely. The sensitivity of HPALD production to the concentrations of the
bimolecular reaction partners of ISOPO2 (e.g. NO) can also lead to
resolution issues with the model: regions with high and low NO concentrations
are treated as a single region within the model (model grids can be up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wide at the Equator) with moderate [NO], suppressing
HPALD formation (see Schwantes et al., 2020). A commentary on the global
distribution of HPALDs and IEPOX is given in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Monoterpenes (MT)</title>
      <p id="d1e5592">Simulated surface diel monoterpene profiles (Fig. 1) are characterized by
early morning and evening peaks that are not<?pagebreak page5252?> present in observations. As
discussed in relation to the isoprene diel cycle, the morning peak is
probably caused by a combination of the simulated emissions increasing too
early and a delayed evolution of the simulated BL height, trapping large
quantities of monoterpenes close to the surface (Fig. S8). The evening peak
coincides with a reduction of simulated OH to near zero and therefore is
probably driven by oxidant reduction and a reduction in the BL
height. Around midday the mechanisms do a better job in most locations, with
the lower values in the CRI mechanisms driven by the greater oxidant
concentrations. In four of the five locations, CS2 yields the smallest model bias,
although it is acknowledged that other issues, such as the BL dynamics, need
attention.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Comparison to CRI-STRAT</title>
      <p id="d1e5604">The performance of the CS mechanism compared to the simpler ST mechanism was
discussed in detail in Archer-Nicholls et al. (2021). Here we describe
chemical composition of the atmosphere simulated by CS2 relative to that
from CS using the longer model runs summarized in Table 2. Particular
attention is paid to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its production and loss fluxes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
isoprene and monoterpenes, the isoprene oxidation productions IEPOX and
HPALDs, nitrated species (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the potential impacts to aerosols.
Changes to CO and HCHO are discussed in Sect. S5 in the Supplement.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{O${}_{{x}}$}?><title>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page5253?><p id="d1e5659">As in Archer-Nicholls et al. (2021), the change to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was analysed by
considering the sum of odd oxygen, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its reservoir species,
termed O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>).

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M389" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PANs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden increases by 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 328 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in CS to 354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in CS2. Much of the free troposphere exhibits increases of 2–6 ppb
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with large parts of the tropical
troposphere increasing by more than 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1). This increase is driven
chiefly by a 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical destruction, resulting in
a 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in net chemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production. The sensitivity tests
(Table S4) reveal the update to the isoprene mechanism only has a minor
effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease), while the changes
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and inorganic nitrogen reactions each yield increases of 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(when considered in isolation) with greater impacts in the lower and upper
troposphere, respectively (Fig. S16 in the Supplement). The changes to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden in
the sensitivity tests do not sum to the total 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase from CS to CS2,
which indicates a degree of interplay between the different updates, an
unsurprising result given O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>'s central role in tropospheric chemistry.</p>
      <p id="d1e6000">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime, defined as the ratio of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden (B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the
sum of chemical (L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and physical (D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss fluxes (Eq. 2) (Young et al., 2018;
Archibald et al., 2020b), increase by 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 18.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in CS2, while ozone production efficiency (OPE),
defined as moles of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> produced (P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) per mole of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Eq. 3) (Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021), increases negligibly from
33.74 to 33.78.

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M422" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>OPE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases across almost the entire globe with increases
of 2–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over much of Europe, Africa, and the
Americas and 4–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over India and China (Fig. 4), exacerbating the
existing high bias in CS (Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021). The sensitivity
tests allow this change to be partially decomposed into the different
drivers (Fig. S13 in the Supplement). The update to isoprene chemistry produces localized
increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the tropical forested regions of South America,
Africa, and East Asia of 2–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production via
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and MeO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  outweighs the reduction in the
non-methyl peroxy radical (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ) pathway (discussed later).
While comparison to Khan et al. (2020) is difficult given the multiple
mechanistic differences, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  also
decreased in their study. The changes to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also yield an increase
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the entire globe (due to reduced O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss
via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a larger increase (2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) encompassing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. The change to inorganic nitrogen also leads to
terrestrial increases of 2–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production via
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d1e6544">Annual mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diagnostics for CRI-STRAT and CRI-STRAT 2 and the
difference between the mechanisms (percentage changes in parentheses). UKESM1
CMIP6 1995–2004 using ST: chemical production <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5315 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
chemical loss <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4476 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; dry deposition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 867 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Griffiths et al., 2021). Entries in bold show total production, loss and deposition, and entries in plain text show individual components of this production, loss and deposition.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CS2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">328</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">354</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26 (7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4 (8.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OPE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05 (0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>Chemical production (Tg yr</bold><inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>6572</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>6582</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>10 (0.1 %)</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4099</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4322</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">132 (3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MeOO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1573</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1583</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 (0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">849</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">717</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>131 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>Chemical loss (Tg yr</bold><inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>5834</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>5757</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>77 (1.3 %)</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3157</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2928</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>229 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1666</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1819</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">152 (9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">740</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">796</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">57 (7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Alkene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">166</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">101</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">105</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8 (10.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>Deposition (Tg yr</bold><inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>1133</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1207</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>76 (6.5 %)</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dry deposition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">942</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">77 (8.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">191</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">189</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 (1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Inferred STT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">395</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">384</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e7392">Annual zonal mean change in <bold>(a)</bold> total O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production flux, <bold>(b)</bold>
total O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical loss flux, and <bold>(c)</bold> net O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical production
flux. The purple line indicates mean tropopause height.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Table 7</label><caption><p id="d1e7441">Tropospheric average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> parameters for CS and CS2.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CS2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.355</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.334</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.021 (1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.988</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.002 (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[OH]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.369</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.349</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02 (1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime w.r.t. OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>years</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.17 (2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e7728">Annual zonal mean changes in <bold>(a)</bold> OH and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between CS2
and CS, <bold>(c)</bold> absolute and <bold>(d)</bold> percentage in change in OH in lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of atmosphere, <bold>(e)</bold> the change in OH in lowest 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
between the CS2 and CS2_isoprene sensitivity test, and <bold>(f)</bold>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production flux from HPUCARB12 and HUCARB9 photolysis as a
percentage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Dark purple
lines in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> indicate the average height of tropopause.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>5.1.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{O${}_{{x}}$ Budget}?><title>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Budget</title>
      <p id="d1e7875">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production and loss fluxes for CS and CS2 are given in Table 6 and
the breakdown for the sensitivity tests is given in Table S4. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production decreases in CS2 in much of the tropical and Southern Hemisphere (SH) BL and lower free
troposphere but increases in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) mid-latitude BL and tropical high
troposphere, while O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss decreases strongly in the tropical BL and
lower free troposphere (Fig. 5). Despite the modest changes to total O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production and loss fluxes, the story is more complicated than it first
appears due to offsetting changes to the key chemical production and loss
fluxes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>5.1.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{O${}_{{x}}$ production}?><title>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production</title>
      <p id="d1e7932">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  pathway represents the largest absolute increase of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production (3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 6) with particular increases in the NH
tropics and mid-latitude boundary layer and tropical upper troposphere (Fig. S12 in the Supplement). The drivers of this change are complex: the low altitude increases are
driven by the significant increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6), which exceed 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in places, while at higher altitudes the increase is attributed to a
localized 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rise in NO. The sensitivity tests suggest the change to
the isoprene scheme (CS2_isoprene) is a key driver in the
rise of low-altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and thus the flux), while the change to the
inorganic nitrogen reactions (CS2_inorgN) also contributes to
the increased flux at low altitudes and is chiefly responsible for the
increase at higher altitudes.</p>
      <p id="d1e8016">However, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  is offset by a decrease in the NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux (15.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 6) where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> comprises all peroxy
radicals except the methyl peroxy radical, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MeO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This reduction is
strongest in the tropical BL and low free troposphere and driven by a
significant decrease in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden (32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This burden reduction
arises from the isomerization pathways that inhibit the conversion of the
isoprene-derived peroxy radical, RU14O2, to the other peroxy radicals RU12O2
and RU10O2 (via reactions with standard partners such as NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) by
providing competing routes that yield other species whose degradation
pathways do not produce further <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Khan et al., 2020). For example,
the HPALDs produced are photolysed to hydroxy acetone and unsaturated
hydroxy carbonyls that further degrade producing mostly closed-shell
products and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This rapid reaction pathway for RU14O2 sees its
burden decrease by 35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in CS2 compared to CS, and tropical low-altitude
mixing ratios decline by over 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similar declines in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO flux (15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden (33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are seen for CS2 relative to
the CS2_isoprene sensitivity test, providing strong evidence
that the change to isoprene is driving the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Khan et al. (2020) also simulated a reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden (and a corresponding
drop in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production via this pathway), although their decrease of
6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is less than half the equivalent value (including MeO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this work, likely due to the other differences between the
mechanisms used in their work and this study (see Sect. 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e8257">The fluxes of NO with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MeO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> account for over
99.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of total O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production in both mechanisms, and the changes in
other pathways are an order of magnitude smaller in absolute terms. The
reduction in the rate constant for OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MeONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. 4.1) reduces
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production from organic nitrate oxidation significantly while also
driving the increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production from organic nitrate photolysis.
The addition of the photolysis of isoprene hydroxy nitrate and the other
nitrates RU12NO3 and RU10NO3 make smaller contributions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>5.1.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{O${}_{{x}}$ loss}?><title>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss</title>
      <?pagebreak page5254?><p id="d1e8366">The change in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical destruction is dominated by the reduction in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction (7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which accounts for 54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss in CS but only 49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in CS2. In the sensitivity run
CS2_O1D, which uses the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate constants as CS,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux accounts for 54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical loss.
As this reaction involves water, the change is strongest in the tropical BL
and low free troposphere (Fig. S14 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e8498">The increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 6) is
driven predominantly by changes to the inorganic nitrogen and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reactions, while the isoprene scheme is simulated to have little impact.
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss via OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also increases (7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) despite the
decrease in free troposphere <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the new isoprene chemistry and
revised inorganic nitrogen reactions simulated to play important roles.
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction from O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> alkene reactions decline significantly
(39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) yet increase at very low altitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) before
decreasing at higher altitudes. This altitude dependence may arise from the
enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> low altitude driving a greater O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> alkene flux, but
at higher altitudes the depletion of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the elevated
OH mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction is lower.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e8711">Annual mixing ratio of isoprene averaged over the lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> in CS and <bold>(b)</bold> the difference between CS2 and CS.
Annual zonal mean mixing ratios in <bold>(c)</bold> CS and <bold>(d)</bold> the difference between CS2 and
CS (note the log scales used for colour maps). Annual average total oxidation flux of isoprene
<bold>(e)</bold> in CS and <bold>(f)</bold> the difference between CS2 and CS.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e8760">Annual mean mixing ratios for <bold>(a)</bold> HPALDs and <bold>(b)</bold> IEPOX over lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. DJF (December–January–February) and JJA (June–July–August) zonal mean mixing
ratios for HPALDs <bold>(c, d)</bold> and IEPOX <bold>(e, f)</bold>; note the differing scales for HPALD
and IEPOX plots and log scales for <bold>(c–f)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Table 8</label><caption><p id="d1e8806">Burdens of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its constituent species, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition, and inferred stratosphere-to-troposphere
(STT) transport of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Values in parentheses for burdens show the
fraction of total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden represented by each constituent and the fraction of total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition
represented by each pathway for
deposition diagnostics.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CS2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CS2 – CS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.088</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.036</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.052</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.118 (10.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.123 (11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.005</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.972 (89.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.914 (88.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.058</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.523 (48.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.521 (50.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.002</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other inorganic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.020 (1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.014 (1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.006</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PANs burden/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.367 (33.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.292 (28.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.075</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.044 (4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.070 (6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.026</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MeO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.008 (0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.008 (0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0007</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrophenols burden/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.009 (0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.009 (0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0005</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">55.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">62.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Inferred STT/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.32 (10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.30 (10.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wet deposition/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29.01 (46.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29.26 (46.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dry deposition/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.66 (34.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.79 (35.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other inorganic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.21 (2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.96 (1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PANs/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.45 (3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.93 (3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.41 (2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.03 (3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrophenols deposition/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08 (0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07 (0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e9911">Tropospheric annual zonal mean change in <bold>(a)</bold> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold>
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> PANs, and <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between
CS2 and CS. The purple line shows the average tropopause height.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e9990">Tropospheric annual zonal mean production flux of
Sec_Org in <bold>(a)</bold> CS and <bold>(b)</bold> the difference between CS2 and CS.
Tropospheric annual zonal mean flux of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH in <bold>(c)</bold> CS and <bold>(d)</bold> the difference
between CS2 and CS.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/5239/2021/gmd-14-5239-2021-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{HO}$}${}_{{x}}$}?><title>
          <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
          <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
        </title>
      <?pagebreak page5256?><p id="d1e10055">The change to OH shows significant spatial and altitudinal variation,
increasing at low altitude over land but decreasing over the oceans and in
much of the free troposphere. This stems from the different drivers of OH
concentrations and their relative importance in different regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e10058">At low altitude, the terrestrial increases in OH (Fig. 6c, d) are revealed
by the sensitivity tests to be driven predominantly by the isoprene scheme:
a clear illustration of impact of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-recycling chemistry (Fig. S15 in the Supplement). The inorganic nitrogen changes make a smaller contribution to the low-latitude OH increase, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes reduce low-altitude OH, but
this effect is only noticeable over the oceans.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5257?><p id="d1e10094">This significant increase in low terrestrial altitude OH is of particular
interest in the context of BVOCs and their impact on the chemical
composition of the atmosphere. Concentrations in the lowest 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase
by 2–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in much of the Amazon, with
similar changes seen in other tropical regions and the southeastern USA, the
regions with the greatest emissions of isoprene and BVOCs. The boreal forest
regions in North America and Eurasia exhibit modest increases of up to
10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in places since isoprene emissions are lower (Fig. S15). The
influence of the updated isoprene chemistry is further apparent when the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production flux from two of the key new <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-recycling pathways,
i.e. photolysis of the HPALD and hydroxy unsaturated carbonyl (HUCARB9) species, is compared to that from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6f). Over the
Amazon and other tropical regions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux from this pathway amounts
to more than 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of that from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The difference in
BVOC-driven depletion of oxidant concentrations at low altitudes will be
even more pronounced when CS2 is compared with ST, which exhibited even lower
tropical low-altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g. Fig. 9, Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e10285">However, in much of the free troposphere, OH decreases by 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative
to CS due to the changes made to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate constants (Fig. S20 in the Supplement),
which reduces the fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacting with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6a).
This general decline is reversed in the upper tropical troposphere (10–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where OH increases by up to 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, driven by an increase in NO stemming
from the update to inorganic nitrogen reactions and a smaller contribution
from the updated isoprene chemistry (Fig. S16). These free troposphere
changes partially reverse the changes simulated between CS and ST (Fig. 6,
Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021). In that comparison, tropical free troposphere
OH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) increased in CS relative to ST by 0.5–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while here CS2 yields a decrease in the same location of
0.25–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to CS. In the upper tropical
troposphere, CS decreased OH by 1–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to
ST, while CS2 exhibits an increase of 0.25–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the same region compared to CS. Thus, the distribution of free troposphere
OH in CS2 is more similar to that in ST than the CS distribution is.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5258?><p id="d1e10503">Overall, the reduction in the free troposphere OH outweighs the increases
elsewhere with the tropospheric air mass-weighted concentration and burden
of OH decreasing in CS2 by 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. This is in
sharp contrast to the 6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in burden simulated by Khan et al. (2020). However, in the CS2_O1D sensitivity test the OH
burden increases by 6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to CS, allowing us to be confident that
the discrepancy between Khan et al. (2020) and this work is
predominantly down to the differing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate constants. Despite the
increase in surface OH, the net reduction in tropospheric OH yields a
2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in methane lifetime from 7.43 to 7.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 7), also
in contrast to the 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease in methane lifetime simulated by Khan
et al. (2020). However, the isolated change to isoprene chemistry, given by
the comparison of CS2 and CS2_isoprene, causes a methane
lifetime decreases of 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the enhanced low-altitude OH.</p>
      <p id="d1e10588"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also increases at low altitude (up to 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface, Fig. 6b), driven primarily by the new isoprene chemistry, but this increase
extends much further into the free troposphere than OH, reaching nearly 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
above the Equator. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases in the rest of the free troposphere,
partially from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes, and does not exhibit the high increase
shown by OH, instead declining by 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropical high troposphere,
resulting in a burden decrease of 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The greater increase in low-altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (than for OH) is likely to be due in part to co-located
increases in CO of 3–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see the Supplement and Fig. S21a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>BVOCs</title>
      <p id="d1e10705">The interactive nature of iBVOC emissions led to average isoprene emissions
being 0.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) lower in CS2, while monoterpene emissions
were 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) lower. However, these differences are
dwarfed by the reductions in the burdens of isoprene, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene of 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e10797">Isoprene mixing ratios averaged over the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decrease by 1–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in large parts of South
America, Africa, and Southeast Asia (Fig. 7). The greater terrestrial low-altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases the OH-initiated oxidative flux of isoprene by
3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, attributable almost entirely to the updated isoprene scheme.
However, this is actually outweighed by a 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease in isoprene
destruction by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while oxidation via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Despite the modest global increase, isoprene oxidation is confined even more
to low-altitude regions (Fig. 7), a feature also simulated by Karset et al. (2018) (Fig. 8). This also results in lower mixing ratios throughout the
whole troposphere (Fig. 7).</p>
      <p id="d1e10912"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene's chemical destruction by OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changed by
7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, leading to a total flux increase
of 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The corresponding changes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene
with OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a
total increase of 0.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e11108">The reductions to these BVOC burdens are greater than those simulated by
Khan et al. (2020) of 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for isoprene, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, respectively. However, Khan et al. (2020) simulated a reduction in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over tropical regions and a much smaller increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden
(1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),<?pagebreak page5259?> which would have resulted in significantly lower BVOC destruction
fluxes, particularly for the monoterpenes. As discussed in Sect. 4, CS2
simulates a reduction in the model high bias of surface isoprene and (to a
lesser extent) monoterpenes when compared to CS and ST.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>HPALDs and IEPOX</title>
      <p id="d1e11189">While a comparison cannot be made between CS and CS2 for HPALDs and IEPOX,
their importance for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling and SOA formation, respectively, means that
examining their global distribution is still useful. Both species follow the
surface distribution of isoprene closely (Fig. 8) with IEPOX concentrations
typically an order of magnitude greater than HPALDs, something also
reflected in their burdens (0.39 and 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). As discussed
in Sect. 4, loss of IEPOX to aerosol via reactive uptake is not currently
modelled, and simulated concentrations will decrease once this process is
included. Indeed, accurate modelling of IEPOX and its contribution to SOA
has been suggested to be important in future climate scenarios (Jo et al.,
2021), which highlights the benefits of including IEPOX in CS2 but also the
need for careful consideration of how aerosol uptake is modelled. Simulated
advection up to the upper tropical troposphere is clearly seen in the DJF
zonal means, with potentially important consequences for the IEPOX-derived SOA
that has been observed in the lower troposphere in flight campaigns (e.g.
Allan et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <label>5.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{NO${}_{{y}}$}?><title>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e11233">The distribution of nitrated products (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) between reactive (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and reservoir species (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) changes between CS and CS2 and is detailed
in Table 8. Here we use the standard definitions of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021) (Eqs. 4–6):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M827" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ClONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PANs</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nitrophenols</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> comprises alkyl nitrates, hydroxy nitrates, and hydroperoxy
nitrates, while PANs comprise all species with peroxyacyl nitrate
functionality.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5260?><p id="d1e11496">The NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden decreases by 4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in terms of mass of N), driven
primarily by a 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline in PANs. However, the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden
increases by 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the widespread increase in the tropical high
troposphere of 10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (up to 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), outweighing the reduction in the NH
mid-latitude PBL (10–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 9a). The increase in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the reduction in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to the fraction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as reactive
nitrogen increasing by 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the associated increases to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production, particularly in the free troposphere, are identified in Sect. 5.1. The sensitivity tests revealed the high-altitude NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rise to be
driven predominantly by the change to the inorganic nitrogen, with a smaller
contribution from the updated isoprene scheme (Fig. S17 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e11638">The 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden is dominated by the decrease in PANs,
which exceeds 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in most of the 40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S troposphere (Fig. 10e). The
decrease in the PAN formation rate constant discussed in Sect. 2 is not
the principal driver of this reduction despite reducing by 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in much of
the troposphere. For the single year used for the sensitivity tests, the
PANs burden in CS2_inorgN (featuring the larger formation
rate constant) (0.292 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is much closer to that in CS2 (0.290 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than in
CS (0.364 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A more important factor is the reduction in the
PAN-precursor acyl peroxy radical (MeCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), driven by the updated
isoprene chemistry, whose burden decreases by over 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both CS2 and
the sensitivity test CS2_inorgN. This dependency is clearly
illustrated by the fact that the isolated change to the inorganic nitrogen
reactions (CS2_inorgN) only produces a small decrease to low-altitude PANs, while the change to isoprene scheme (CS2_isoprene) yields a much larger decrease in PANs in spatial agreement with
the CS2–CS difference (Fig. S18 in the Supplement). The PANs burden of 0.317 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
CS2_isoprene test is also closer to that in CS. However, the
change in PANs between CS2 and CS is still larger than that simulated from
the isolated isoprene chemistry change alone, which suggests there are some
synergistic effects occurring.</p>
      <p id="d1e11756">The 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, including increases of up to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the tropical mid-troposphere (Fig. 9d), is driven more by the update to
the isoprene scheme than the change to inorganic nitrogen reactions (Fig. S19 in the Supplement).</p>
      <?pagebreak page5261?><p id="d1e11786">The 59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden in CS2 is predominantly due to the
significant reduction in the rate constant for the OH-initiated destruction
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MeONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the principal organonitrate, which brings CS2 into agreement
with STRAT-TROP and the most recent IUPAC value. At 290 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the rate constant
is 18 times lower in CS2 and at 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it is 50 times lower, yielding a 3-fold
MeONO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden increase. The update to the isoprene scheme, when isolated,
actually reduces RONO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, despite the introduction of the two new organic
nitrates (RU12NO3 and RU10NO3). As discussed in the context of the RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
burden, this is driven by the added competition from the RU14O2
isomerization reactions: the flux of the RU14O2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  reaction is 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
lower in CS2 than CS. The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is simulated to be 10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropical lower altitude and 2–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the rest of the
troposphere (Fig. 9f, S20).</p>
      <p id="d1e11914">With the significant drop in PANs as a fraction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the breakdown of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in CS2 is closer to that in ST (Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021). The
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the only major exception to this since ST, which
only has two organonitrate species (isoprene nitrate and MeO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), has a
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden than CS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS6">
  <label>5.6</label><title>Impacts on aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e12013">A key area of future research with the CRI mechanisms will be on their
influence on aerosols. The spatial changes to oxidants are likely to
influence secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation, as discussed in Sect. 1. In UKCA, SOA is produced from the tracer Sec_Org, a
surrogate for the oxidized products of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene that adds to
existing organic aerosol with an optional boundary layer nucleation scheme
involving Sec_Org and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on Metzger et al. (2010) also available. The Sec_Org burden decreases by 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in CS2 with noticeable annual variation (DJF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, JJA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Despite
the burden decrease, within the lowest 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropics
Sec_Org mass concentration increases by 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, driven by
an increase its production from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene (Fig. 10a, b).
Above this region, Sec_Org production and mass concentration
decrease, and thus it appears the greater low-altitude oxidative capacity in
CS2 leads to greater production of Sec_Org within the
boundary layer but lower concentrations above it. This is likely to have an
impact on SOA distribution (and lifetime) since deposition and loss to the
aerosol phase is greater in the boundary layer due to the steep decline in
aerosol surface aerosol density with altitude. Further detailed analysis
involving the fluxes of Sec_Org to aerosol and the resulting
changes to size and number distributions are beyond the scope of this work,
but examining wider consequences for SOA, in the context of the
BVOC-mediated feedback between the biosphere and climate, will form a key
area of future research. It is also worth noting an even more pronounced
perturbation to SOA may be seen if isoprene is allowed to produce
Sec_Org, which is a more realistic approach to simulating SOA
(e.g. Scott et al., 2014)
and will be explored in future work.</p>
      <p id="d1e12124">The global perturbation to the oxidation pathways of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, another
important aerosol precursor, are more modest. From CS to CS2, the oxidative
fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, while the tropospheric sulfate
aerosol burden decreases by just 2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, as with isoprene
oxidation and Sec_Org production, the burden change belies
the more complex perturbations occurring. The increased oxidants at lower
altitudes and reduction at greater altitudes result in gas-phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation increasing by 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropical and mid-latitude PBL but
decreasing at higher altitudes (Fig. 10c, d). This effect is expected to be
even more pronounced when CS2 is compared to ST, which simulates even lower
low-altitude OH than CS (Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021) and has been the
standard mechanism for investigations into aerosol–oxidant coupling in UKCA
(Thornhill et al., 2021; Weber et al., 2020; O'Connor et al., 2021).
Therefore, the mechanism-driven changes to oxidants are likely to have
consequences for both SOA and sulfate aerosol. While a full investigation
into oxidant aerosol coupling is beyond the scope of this paper, it will
form a central part of future work with the CRI mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Summary and synthesis</title>
      <p id="d1e12260">The key changes between CS and CS2, driven by the multiple chemistry
changes, can be summarized as follows.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12265">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production increases marginally in CS2, but a larger decrease in
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction, driven by a significant reduction in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux, leads to a greater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tropospheric burden and mixing
ratios.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12324">The update to the isoprene chemistry increases low-altitude tropical
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the reduction in OH production from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
results in lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in much of the free troposphere,
increasing methane lifetime.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12386">The update to the inorganic nitrogen reactions increases NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a
fraction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a significant increase in the upper tropical free
troposphere and a co-located increase in OH. The PAN burden decreases by
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e12416">The increase in boundary layer oxidative capacity reduces the burden of
BVOCs and confines their oxidation even more to low altitudes, with likely
consequences for aerosol production and lifetime.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e12427">The radiative impact of isoprene, via its influence on atmospheric chemical
composition and organic aerosol, means an accurate description of its
chemistry is crucial for advancing our understanding of pre-industrial,
present-day and future atmospheres. In this study we describe the
incorporation of the Common Representative Intermediates chemistry scheme
version 2.2 (CRI v2.2), along with accompanying stratospheric chemistry,
into the global chemistry–climate model<?pagebreak page5262?> UKCA to create the mechanism
CRI-Strat 2 (CS2). The introduction of CS2 into UKCA facilitates a
semi-explicit description of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-recycling chemistry during isoprene
oxidation via the isomerization of isoprene peroxy radicals to produce
HPALDs that yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> upon photolysis. This is a key process for
reconciling the model low bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, BVOC-rich
regions. In addition, CS2 also features updates to the rate constants of the
reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M928" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, inorganic nitrogen, and organic peroxy radicals with
NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, bringing the mechanism into agreement with the most recent
IUPAC values. CS2 is one of the first mechanisms with this functionality
suitable for long-term climate integrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e12516">A rigorous comparison using UKCA with CS2 and two other chemical mechanisms,
STRAT-TROP (ST) (the standard chemistry mechanism used in UKESM1's
contributions to CMIP6 experiments) and CRI-STRAT (CS) (which has
tropospheric chemistry from an earlier version of the CRI, CRI v2.1), is
performed against high-frequency surface and airborne observational data
from BVOC-rich regions for multiple chemical species, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and isoprene, and monoterpene and isoprene oxidation production. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling in CS2 results in significantly enhanced surface diel OH
(up to 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than CS at midday) in the Amazon and Borneo (improving
model low bias), leading to improved modelling of diel and vertical isoprene
profiles and reducing the mean 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bias by 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
relative to ST and CS, respectively, across the locations considered.
However, CRI-Strat 2 exacerbates the existing isoprene model low bias away
from the surface, suggesting potential issues with model vertical
convection. CS and CS2 yield smaller isoprene column biases compared to
observations than ST, in line with the surface and free troposphere
observational comparisons, while also illustrating the significant influence
the chemical mechanism has on modelled column. This comparison also
highlights the significant influence that the different chemistry schemes have on
the simulated isoprene column and thus the considerable challenges of
determining isoprene emissions via back-calculation.</p>
      <p id="d1e12606">The low-altitude high biases for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in CS increase modestly (1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in CS2. Simulated monoterpene concentrations are biased high at the surface
at most of the locations considered, with CS2 returning the smallest bias. As
with isoprene, simulated monoterpenes display sharp morning and evening
peaks that are believed to be due to boundary layer height issues. Modelled
high bias of IEPOX and the low bias of HPALDs suggest further investigation
of the key processes of loss to aerosol for IEPOX and HPALD photolysis
frequency are needed.</p>
      <p id="d1e12628">In addition to observational comparisons, a detailed comparison of UKCA
model output using CS2 is performed, complementing the earlier comparison of
ST and CS (Archer-Nicholls et al., 2021). Sensitivity tests are also
performed to help isolate the drivers of the differences between CS and CS2.
CS2 simulates an 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M943" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden this is primarily driven
by reduced O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss as the changes to rate constants of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M947" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M948" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mean that a smaller fraction
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to produce OH. Low-altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases by 2–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M952" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over much of the globe, driven predominantly by changes
to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M953" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and inorganic nitrogen reactions. More broadly, the
widespread influence of the changes to the rate constants of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M954" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
multiple inorganic nitrogen species highlights the importance of having
accurate information for these parameters.</p>
      <p id="d1e12797">Relative to CS, low-altitude OH increases over terrestrial regions,
exceeding 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M955" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in some tropical forested regions, primarily due to the
influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling from isoprene. However, OH decreases over
the oceans and in much of the free troposphere, driven by updates to the rate
constants of the reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M958" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M960" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M961" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a
result, methane lifetime increases by 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M962" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is in stark contrast to previous
studies using CRI v2.2 in the STOCHEM model that did not make changes to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and inorganic nitrogen reactions. When the changes to isoprene
chemistry are isolated, methane lifetime decreases by 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M964" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
qualitatively in line with previous studies. The addition of isomerization
pathways in the updated isoprene scheme reduces the methyl (7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M965" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
non-methyl peroxy (36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M966" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) radical burdens.</p>
      <p id="d1e12926">The distribution of nitrated species (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in CS2 is closer to that
simulated in ST than CS is with a significant reduction (20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the burden
of PANs thatis driven by a reduction in the precursor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> burden increases by 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M971" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e12974">The increase in low-altitude OH reduced the burdens of isoprene (25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
monoterpenes (11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M973" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M974" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the extent of their dispersion: more oxidation
takes place in the boundary layer, where loss of oxidation products such as
the lumped SOA precursor Sec_Org to existing aerosol is
likely to be greater. Enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M975" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in the boundary layer is
also simulated. These changes are likely to have implications for SOA and
sulfate aerosol, particularly as CS has already been shown to have a more
highly oxidizing boundary layer than ST. Therefore, the difference between
CS2 and ST (the mechanism used to explore chemical–aerosol coupling in
UKESM1 in CMIP6 experiments) is likely to be significant and will be the
subject of future work.</p>
      <p id="d1e13012">The addition of CS2 also lays the groundwork for the incorporation of a
novel chemistry scheme that describes the formation of the highly oxidized
organic molecules (HOMs) derived from biogenic species such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M976" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene (e.g. CRI-HOM, Weber et al., 2020b). HOMs are crucial for new
particle formation without sulfuric acid (Kirkby et al., 2016; Simon et al., 2020), a process which is an important source of new particles in the
Amazonian free troposphere (Zhao et al., 2020)
and has been simulated to
have consequences for our understanding of pre-industrial aerosol burden
(Gordon et al., 2016). The influence of isoprene in HOM production
(Kiendler-Schaar et al., 2009; McFiggans et al., 2019; Heinritzi et al.,
2020) can also be captured by the addition of CRI-HOM, making UKCA one of the
very first global<?pagebreak page5263?> chemistry–climate models to feature a semi-explicit
representation of HOMs and enabling further investigation into the climatic
impact of the interaction between BVOCs. The addition of long-chain terpenes to CS2
is also planned, including sesquiterpenes, which may reduce the surface
ozone high bias, form HOMs, and make improvements to the uptake of oxidized
species to plant surfaces.</p>
      <p id="d1e13022">While certain elements of the CRI-STRAT 2 mechanism in UKCA such as the
ozone high bias remain problematic, its incorporation represents a major
step forward in our ability to simulate isoprene chemistry in low-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M977" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
environments. The simulated changes to oxidants in CRI-Strat 2 will affect
the atmosphere's radiative balance by perturbing certain greenhouse gases
and aerosols, and investigating the impact of this will be a major topic of future
work. In particular, the feedback between the biosphere and climate,
mediated by BVOCs, will be evaluated using multiple mechanisms to assess
their influence. CRI-Strat 2 can be taken up for use, alongside other
mechanisms, to further our understanding of the wide-ranging impact BVOCs
have on climate.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e13038">Due to intellectual property right restrictions, we cannot provide either
the source code or documentation papers for the UM. The Met Office United
Model is available for use under licence. A number of research organizations
and national meteorological services use the UM in collaboration with the UK
Met Office to undertake basic atmospheric process research, produce
forecasts, develop the UM code, and build and evaluate Earth system models.
For further information on how to apply for a licence, see
<uri>https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/modelling-systems/unified-model</uri>
(last access: 24 November 2020).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e13047">The description of the ZF2 field campaign is given in Sect. S4, and the
observational data are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.65133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17863/CAM.65133</ext-link> (Weber and Bannan, 2021).</p>

      <p id="d1e13053">The observational data from the SEAC4RS flight campaign are available at
<uri>https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/seac4rs?MERGE=1#60_SECOND.DC8_MRG</uri> (Chen, 2016).</p>

      <p id="d1e13059">The observational data from the ATTO tower are available to download at
<uri>https://www.attodata.org</uri> (last access: 9 April 2021).  Specific data sets used were
<uri>https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/72</uri>,  <uri>https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/73</uri>, <uri>https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/74</uri>, and <uri>https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/77</uri> (Yáñez-Serrano, 2020a, b, c, d).</p>

      <p id="d1e13077">The observational data from the FAAM aircraft are available at <uri>http://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/op3/data/op3-aircraft</uri> (last access: 27 March 2021), and the Borneo data can be
found at <uri>http://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/op3/data</uri> (last access: 27 March 2021; Natural Environment Research Council et al., 2010).</p>

      <p id="d1e13086">Data tables of the full CRI-Strat 2 mechanism and the mechanisms used in the
sensitivity test described in this paper are included in the Supplement. The
CRI v2.2 mechanism can be viewed and downloaded from <uri>http://cri.york.ac.uk</uri> (Jenkin et al., 2019b).</p>

      <p id="d1e13093">Model data and analysis code are available from James Weber on request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e13096">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5239-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5239-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e13106">Mechanism incorporation was carried out by JaW with support from SAN and NLA
and advice from ATA, YMS, MJ, MAHK, and DES. Observational comparison
experiments were designed and carried out by JaW with advice from SAN, NLA,
and ATA. Mechanism intercomparison experiments were designed by JaW with
advice from ATA, NLA, and SAN and executed by JaW. TJB, CJP, AB, and PA
compiled and supplied the ZF2 Brazil observational data, and TJB wrote the
field campaign description in the Supplement. RHS advised on the SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M978" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS data
and analysis. JaW interpreted the ZF2 Brazil, Borneo, ATTO, FAAM, GABRIEL,
and SEAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M979" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RS observational data with advice from SAN, ATA, and JoW. JaW wrote
the paper. All co-authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e13130">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e13136">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e13142">This work used Monsoon2, a collaborative high-performance computing facility
funded by the Met Office and the Natural Environment Research Council. This
work used JASMIN, the UK collaborative data analysis facility.</p><p id="d1e13144">We are grateful to Horst Fischer, Hartwig Harder, and Pete Edwards
for their assistance and advice and to Jason Surratt for providing
the calibration standards for the ZF2 Brazil study. We are grateful for the field
support from the LBA central office at INPA in Manaus.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e13149">James Weber has been funded by a Vice-Chancellor's Award from the Cambridge Trust.
Scott Archer-Nicholls and Alex T. Archibald have been funded by NERC PROMOTE (grant no. NE/P016383/1). Nathan Luke Abraham
and Alex T. Archibald are supported by NERC and NCAS through the ACSIS project. Youngsub M. Shin has
been funded by NERC through the University of Cambridge ESS-DTP. M. Anwar H. Khan and
Dudley E. Shallcross are funded by NERC (grant no. NE/K004905/1), Bristol
ChemLabS, and the Primary Science Teaching Trust. Thomas J.Bannan, Carl J. Percival, Asan Bacak, and Paulo Artaxo
acknowledge funding from FAPESP – Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa
do Estado de São Paulo (grant no. 2017/17047-0).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <?pagebreak page5264?><p id="d1e13155">This paper was edited by Tim Butler and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Cresswell, P., Cusworth, S., Dalvi, M., Matthews, D., Wardle, S., and Whitehouse, S.: Using a virtual machine environment for developing, testing, and training for the UM-UKCA composition-climate model, using Unified Model version 10.9 and above, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3647–3657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>Allan, J. D., Morgan, W. T., Darbyshire, E., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Oram, D. E., Artaxo, P., Brito, J., Lee, J. D., and Coe, H.: Airborne observations of IEPOX-derived isoprene SOA in the Amazon during SAMBBA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11393–11407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation>Archibald, A. T., Levine, J. G., Abraham, N. L., Cooke, M. C., Edwards, P. M., Heard, D. E., Jenkin, M. E., Karunaharan, A., Pike, R. C., Monks, P. S., and Shallcross, D. E.: Impacts of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M980" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> regeneration and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene: Consequences for the composition of past, present and future atmospheres, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046520</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Archibald, A. T., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Archer-Nicholls, S., Chipperfield, M. P., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Dennison, F., Dhomse, S. S., Griffiths, P. T., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Hill, R. S., Johnson, C. E., Keeble, J., Köhler, M. O., Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J. P., Ordóñez, C., Pope, R. J., Rumbold, S. T., Russo, M. R., Savage, N. H., Sellar, A., Stringer, M., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., and Zeng, G.: Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1223–1266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y. F., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R. G., Deushi, M., and Finco, A.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment ReportA critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 8, 034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.2020.034</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Archer-Nicholls, S., Abraham, N. L., Shin, Y. M., Weber, J., Russo, M. R., Lowe, D., Utembe, S., O'Connor, F. M., Kerridge, B., Latter, B., and Siddans, R.: The Common Representative Intermediates Mechanism version 2 in the United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosols Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020MS002420</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Bates, K. H. and Jacob, D. J.: A new model mechanism for atmospheric oxidation of isoprene: global effects on oxidants, nitrogen oxides, organic products, and secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9613–9640, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9613-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-9613-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 7a?><mixed-citation>Butler, T. M., Taraborrelli, D., Brühl, C., Fischer, H., Harder, H., Martinez, M., Williams, J., Lawrence, M. G., and Lelieveld, J.: Improved simulation of isoprene oxidation chemistry with the ECHAM5/MESSy chemistry-climate model: lessons from the GABRIEL airborne field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4529–4546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4529-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4529-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 7b?><mixed-citation>Chen, J.: Merged data file for SEAC4RS, Flight 01 (20130806), on the dc8 platform, NASA [data set], available at: <uri>https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/seac4rs?MERGE=1#60_SECOND.DC8_MRG</uri> (last access: 9 April 2021), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., and Peng, Y.: New understanding and quantification of the regime dependence of aerosol-cloud interaction for studying aerosol indirect effects, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 1780–1787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL067683</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 10a?><mixed-citation>Claeys, M. and Maenhaut, W.: Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Isoprene: Selected Research, Historic Account and State of the Art, Atmosphere, 12, 728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060728" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos12060728</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 10b?><mixed-citation>Collins, W. J., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Eyring, V., Hegglin, M. I., Maycock, A., Myhre, G., Prather, M., Shindell, D., and Smith, S. J.: AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 585–607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 11a?><mixed-citation>Crounse, J. D., Paulot, F., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Wennberg, P. O.: Peroxy radical isomerization in the oxidation of isoprene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 13607–13613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP21330J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C1CP21330J</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 11b?><mixed-citation>Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.828</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>Edwards, P. M., Evans, M. J., Furneaux, K. L., Hopkins, J., Ingham, T., Jones, C., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Moller, S. J., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., and Heard, D. E.: OH reactivity in a South East Asian tropical rainforest during the Oxidant and Particle Photochemical Processes (OP3) project, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9497–9514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9497-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9497-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>Gordon, H., Sengupta, K., Rap, A., Duplissy, J., Frege, C., Williamson, C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., and Tröstl, J.: Reduced anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing caused by biogenic new particle formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 12053–12058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602360113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1602360113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>Griffiths, P. T., Murray, L. T., Zeng, G., Shin, Y. M., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Deushi, M., Emmons, L. K., Galbally, I. E., Hassler, B., Horowitz, L. W., Keeble, J., Liu, J., Moeini, O., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Oshima, N., Tarasick, D., Tilmes, S., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., Young, P. J., and Zanis, P.: Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4187–4218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5265?><ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>Heinritzi, M., Dada, L., Simon, M., Stolzenburg, D., Wagner, A. C., Fischer, L., Ahonen, L. R., Amanatidis, S., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bauer, P. S., Baumgartner, B., Bianchi, F., Brilke, S., Chen, D., Chiu, R., Dias, A., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Fuchs, C., Garmash, O., Gordon, H., Granzin, M., El Haddad, I., He, X., Helm, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kangasluoma, J., Keber, T., Kim, C., Kürten, A., Lamkaddam, H., Laurila, T. M., Lampilahti, J., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Makhmutov, V., Manninen, H. E., Marten, R., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Mentler, B., Molteni, U., Müller, T., Nie, W., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Passananti, M., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Pospisilova, V., Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M. P., Rose, C., Schobesberger, S., Scholz, W., Scholze, K., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Volkamer, R., Wagner, R., Wang, M., Weitz, L., Wimmer, D., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Zha, Q., Zhou, X., Amorim, A., Baltensperger, U., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Tomé, A., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., and Curtius, J.: Molecular understanding of the suppression of new-particle formation by isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11809–11821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11809-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11809-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation>Hewitt, C. N., Lee, J. D., MacKenzie, A. R., Barkley, M. P., Carslaw, N., Carver, G. D., Chappell, N. A., Coe, H., Collier, C., Commane, R., Davies, F., Davison, B., DiCarlo, P., Di Marco, C. F., Dorsey, J. R., Edwards, P. M., Evans, M. J., Fowler, D., Furneaux, K. L., Gallagher, M., Guenther, A., Heard, D. E., Helfter, C., Hopkins, J., Ingham, T., Irwin, M., Jones, C., Karunaharan, A., Langford, B., Lewis, A. C., Lim, S. F., MacDonald, S. M., Mahajan, A. S., Malpass, S., McFiggans, G., Mills, G., Misztal, P., Moller, S., Monks, P. S., Nemitz, E., Nicolas-Perea, V., Oetjen, H., Oram, D. E., Palmer, P. I., Phillips, G. J., Pike, R., Plane, J. M. C., Pugh, T., Pyle, J. A., Reeves, C. E., Robinson, N. H., Stewart, D., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., and Yin, X.: Overview: oxidant and particle photochemical processes above a south-east Asian tropical rainforest (the OP3 project): introduction, rationale, location characteristics and tools, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 169–199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-169-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-169-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Watson, L. A., Utembe, S. R., and Shallcross, D. E.: A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 1: Gas phase mechanism development, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7185–7195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.028</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 25?><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Young, J. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The MCM v3.3.1 degradation scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11433–11459, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Khan, M. A. H., Shallcross, D. E., Bergström, R., Simpson, D., Murphy, K. L. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The CRI v2. 2 reduced degradation scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Environ., 212, 172–182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.055</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M., Watson, L., Utembe, S., and Richard, A.: Chemical mechanistic information taken from the CRI mechanism, CRI v2.2 (Jenkin et al., 2019) [data set], available at the Master Chemical Mechanism and CRI websites: <uri>http://mcm.york.ac.uk/</uri> and <uri>http://cri.york.ac.uk/home.htt</uri> (last access: 1 July 2021), 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation>Jo, D. S., Hodzic, A., Emmons, L. K., Tilmes, S., Schwantes, R. H., Mills, M. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Hu, W., Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Singh, B., Lu, Z., Schulz, C., Schneider, J., Shilling, J. E., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Future changes in isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX SOA) under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: the importance of physicochemical dependency, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3395–3425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>Karset, I. H. H., Berntsen, T. K., Storelvmo, T., Alterskjær, K., Grini, A., Olivié, D., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Iversen, T., and Schulz, M.: Strong impacts on aerosol indirect effects from historical oxidant changes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7669–7690, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7669-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7669-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>Kelly, J. M., Doherty, R. M., O'Connor, F. M., and Mann, G. W.: The impact of biogenic, anthropogenic, and biomass burning volatile organic compound emissions on regional and seasonal variations in secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7393–7422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7393-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7393-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>Khan, M. A. H., Schlich, B. L., Jenkin, M. E., Cooke, M. C., Derwent, R. G., Neu, J. L., Percival, C. J., and Shallcross, D. E.: Changes to simulated global atmospheric composition resulting from recent revisions to isoprene oxidation chemistry. Atmos. Environ., 244, 117914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117914" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117914</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Kiendler-Scharr, A., Wildt, J., Dal Maso, M., Hohaus, T., Kleist, E., Mentel, T. F., Tillmann, R., Uerlings, R., Schurr, U., and Wahner, A.: New particle formation in forests inhibited by isoprene emissions. Nature, 461, 381–384, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08292" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08292</ext-link>, 2009, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson, C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., and Tröstl, J.: Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature17953</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Butler, T. M., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Fischer, H., Ganzeveld, L., Harder, H., Lawrence, M. G., Martinez, M., Taraborrelli, D., and Williams, J.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest, Nature, 452, 737–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06870</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Liu, Z., Nguyen, V. S., Harvey, J., Müller, J. F., and Peeters, J.: Theoretically derived mechanisms of HPALD photolysis in isoprene oxidation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 19, 9096–9106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP00288B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C7CP00288B</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>Makkonen, R., Asmi, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Boy, M., Arneth, A., Guenther, A., and Kulmala, M.: BVOC-aerosol-climate interactions in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5.5-HAM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10077–10096, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10077-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10077-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., Spracklen, D. V., Ridley, D. A., Manktelow, P. T., Chipperfield, M. P., Pickering, S. J., and Johnson, C. E.: Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mod<?pagebreak page5266?>e: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 519–551, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>McFiggans, G., Mentel, T. F., Wildt, J., Pullinen, I., Kang, S., Kleist, E., Schmitt, S., Springer, M., Tillmann, R., Wu, C., and Zhao, D.: Secondary organic aerosol reduced by mixture of atmospheric vapours. Nature, 565, 587–593, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0871-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-018-0871-y</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S., Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., and Baltensperger, U.: Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle formation under atmospheric conditions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6646–6651, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911330107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 40a?><mixed-citation>Møller, K. H., Bates, K. H., and Kjaergaard, H. G.: The importance of peroxy radical hydrogen-shift reactions in atmospheric isoprene oxidation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 123, 920–932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b10432" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.8b10432</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 40b?><mixed-citation>Morgenstern, O., Braesicke, P., O'Connor, F. M., Bushell, A. C., Johnson, C. E., Osprey, S. M., and Pyle, J. A.: Evaluation of the new UKCA climate-composition model – Part 1: The stratosphere, Geosci. Model Dev., 2, 43–57, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-43-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-2-43-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>Mulcahy, J. P., Johnson, C., Jones, C. G., Povey, A. C., Scott, C. E., Sellar, A., Turnock, S. T., Woodhouse, M. T., Abraham, N. L., Andrews, M. B., Bellouin, N., Browse, J., Carslaw, K. S., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Glover, M., Grosvenor, D. P., Hardacre, C., Hill, R., Johnson, B., Jones, A., Kipling, Z., Mann, G., Mollard, J., O'Connor, F. M., Palmiéri, J., Reddington, C., Rumbold, S. T., Richardson, M., Schutgens, N. A. J., Stier, P., Stringer, M., Tang, Y., Walton, J., Woodward, S., and Yool, A.: Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6383–6423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 42a?><mixed-citation>Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., and Peeters, J.: Chemistry and deposition in the Model of Atmospheric composition at Global and Regional scales using Inversion Techniques for Trace gas Emissions (MAGRITTE v1.1) – Part 1: Chemical mechanism, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2307–2356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2307-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-2307-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 42b?><mixed-citation>Natural Environment Research Council, Hewitt, N., Edwards, P., Helfter, C., Irwin, M., Karunaharan, A., Lee, J. D., Newton, H., Robinson, N., and Ryder, J.: OP3 Project: Airborne and Ground-based Meteorological Instruments Records as part of the Oxidant and Particle Photochemical Processes above a South-East Asian tropical rain forest, NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre [data set], available at: <uri>http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/9279c7e807a2ef0eb78a03c3821e62c4</uri> (last access: 27 March 2021), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Coggon, M. M., Bates, K. H., Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H., Schilling, K. A., Loza, C. L., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organic aerosol formation from the reactive uptake of isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX) onto non-acidified inorganic seeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3497–3510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X., Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol formation in the atmosphere. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5CP02001H</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation>Novelli, A., Vereecken, L., Bohn, B., Dorn, H.-P., Gkatzelis, G. I., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Reimer, D., Rohrer, F., Rosanka, S., Taraborrelli, D., Tillmann, R., Wegener, R., Yu, Z., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Wahner, A., and Fuchs, H.: Importance of isomerization reactions for OH radical regeneration from the photo-oxidation of isoprene investigated in the atmospheric simulation chamber SAPHIR, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3333–3355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3333-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3333-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Griffiths, P. T., Hardacre, C., Johnson, B. T., Kahana, R., Keeble, J., Kim, B., Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J. P., Richardson, M., Robertson, E., Seo, J., Shim, S., Teixeira, J. C., Turnock, S. T., Williams, J., Wiltshire, A. J., Woodward, S., and Zeng, G.: Assessment of pre-industrial to present-day anthropogenic climate forcing in UKESM1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1211–1243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1211-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1211-2021</ext-link>, 2021</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Olivier, J. G. J., Peters, J., Granier, C., Petron, G., Muller, J.-F., and Wallens, S.: Present and future surface emissions of atmospheric compounds, POET Report #3, EU project EVK2-1999-00011, available at: <uri>http://www.aero.jussieu.fr/projet/ACCENT/Documents/del2_final.doc</uri> (last access: 13 August 2021), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 48?><mixed-citation>Pacifico, F., Folberth, G. A., Jones, C. D., Harrison, S. P., and Collins, W. J.: Sensitivity of biogenic isoprene emissions to past, present, and future environmental conditions and implications for atmospheric chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D22302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018276</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation>Peeters, J., Nguyen, T. L., and Vereecken, L.: HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M981" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical regeneration in the oxidation of isoprene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 5935–5939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B908511D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B908511D</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>Peeters, J., Müller, J. F., Stavrakou, T., and Nguyen, V. S.: Hydroxyl radical recycling in isoprene oxidation driven by hydrogen bonding and hydrogen tunneling: The upgraded LIM1 mechanism, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 8625–8643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5033146" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp5033146</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation>Prather, M. J.: Photolysis rates in correlated overlapping cloud fields: Cloud-J 7.3c, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2587–2595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2587-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-2587-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Sander, R., Baumgaertner, A., Cabrera-Perez, D., Frank, F., Gromov, S., Grooß, J.-U., Harder, H., Huijnen, V., Jöckel, P., Karydis, V. A., Niemeyer, K. E., Pozzer, A., Riede, H., Schultz, M. G., Taraborrelli, D., and Tauer, S.: The community atmospheric chemistry box model CAABA/MECCA-4.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1365–1385, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1365-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-1365-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation>Schwantes, R. H., Emmons, L. K., Orlando, J. J., Barth, M. C., Tyndall, G. S., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., St. Clair, J. M., Blake, D. R., Wisthaler, A., and Bui, T. P. V.: Comprehensive isoprene and terpene gas-phase chemistry improves simulated surface ozone in the southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3739–3776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>Scott, C. E., Rap, A., Spracklen, D. V., Forster, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Mann, G. W., Pringle, K. J., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lihavainen, H., and Tunved, P.: The direct and indirect radiative effects of biogenic secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 447–470, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-447-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-447-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5267?><ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation>Sellar, A. A., Walton, J., Jones, C. G., Wood, R., Abraham, N. L., Andrejczuk, M., Andrews, M. B., Andrews, T., Archibald, A. T., de Mora, L., and Dyson, H.: Implementation of UK Earth system models for CMIP6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS00194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001946" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001946</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation>Simon, M., Dada, L., Heinritzi, M., Scholz, W., Stolzenburg, D., Fischer, L., Wagner, A. C., Kürten, A., Rörup, B., He, X.-C., Almeida, J., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bauer, P. S., Beck, L., Bergen, A., Bianchi, F., Bräkling, S., Brilke, S., Caudillo, L., Chen, D., Chu, B., Dias, A., Draper, D. C., Duplissy, J., El-Haddad, I., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Gonzalez-Carracedo, L., Gordon, H., Granzin, M., Hakala, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C., Kong, W., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Manninen, H. E., Marie, G., Marten, R., Mentler, B., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Nie, W., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Philippov, M., Quéléver, L. L. J., Ranjithkumar, A., Rissanen, M. P., Schallhart, S., Schobesberger, S., Schuchmann, S., Shen, J., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Tomé, A. R., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, R., Wang, M., Wang, D. S., Wang, Y., Weber, S. K., Wu, Y., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Ye, Q., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Zhou, X., Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., and Curtius, J.: Molecular understanding of new-particle formation from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M982" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M983" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M984" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M985" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9183–9207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9183-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-9183-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 59?><mixed-citation>Sindelarova, K., Granier, C., Bouarar, I., Guenther, A., Tilmes, S., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Kuhn, U., Stefani, P., and Knorr, W.: Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9317–9341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Sporre, M. K., Blichner, S. M., Schrödner, R., Karset, I. H. H., Berntsen, T. K., van Noije, T., Bergman, T., O'Donnell, D., and Makkonen, R.: Large difference in aerosol radiative effects from BVOC-SOA treatment in three Earth system models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8953–8973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8953-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-8953-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation>Squire, O. J., Archibald, A. T., Griffiths, P. T., Jenkin, M. E., Smith, D., and Pyle, J. A.: Influence of isoprene chemical mechanism on modelled changes in tropospheric ozone due to climate and land use over the 21st century, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5123–5143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5123-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5123-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 63?><mixed-citation>Telford, P. J., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Braesicke, P., Dalvi, M., Morgenstern, O., O'Connor, F. M., Richards, N. A. D., and Pyle, J. A.: Implementation of the Fast-JX Photolysis scheme (v6.4) into the UKCA component of the MetUM chemistry-climate model (v7.3), Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 161–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-161-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-161-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation>Teng, A. P., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Isoprene peroxy radical dynamics, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 139, 5367–5377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.6b12838</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation>Thornhill, G., Collins, W., Olivié, D., Skeie, R. B., Archibald, A., Bauer, S., Checa-Garcia, R., Fiedler, S., Folberth, G., Gjermundsen, A., Horowitz, L., Lamarque, J.-F., Michou, M., Mulcahy, J., Nabat, P., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Paulot, F., Schulz, M., Scott, C. E., Séférian, R., Smith, C., Takemura, T., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., and Weber, J.: Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1105–1126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation>Toon, O. B., Maring, H., Dibb, J., Ferrare, R., Jacob, D. J., Jensen, E. J., Luo, Z. J., Mace, G. G., Pan, L. L., Pfister, L., and Rosenlof, K. H.: Planning, implementation, and scientific goals of the Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) field mission, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 4967–5009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024297" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024297</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation>Twomey, S. J. A. E.: Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8, 1251–1256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation>Unger, N.: On the role of plant volatiles in anthropogenic global climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8563–8569, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL061616</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation>Utembe, S. R., Cooke, M. C., Archibald, A. T., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Shallcross, D. E.: Using a reduced Common Representative Intermediates (CRIv2-R5) mechanism to simulate tropospheric ozone in a 3-D Lagrangian chemistry transport model, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1609–1622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.044</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 38b?><mixed-citation>Walters, D., Baran, A. J., Boutle, I., Brooks, M., Earnshaw, P., Edwards, J., Furtado, K., Hill, P., Lock, A., Manners, J., Morcrette, C., Mulcahy, J., Sanchez, C., Smith, C., Stratton, R., Tennant, W., Tomassini, L., Van Weverberg, K., Vosper, S., Willett, M., Browse, J., Bushell, A., Carslaw, K., Dalvi, M., Essery, R., Gedney, N., Hardiman, S., Johnson, B., Johnson, C., Jones, A., Jones, C., Mann, G., Milton, S., Rumbold, H., Sellar, A., Ujiie, M., Whitall, M., Williams, K., and Zerroukat, M.: The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1909–1963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 71a?><mixed-citation>Watson, L. A., Shallcross, D. E., Utembe, S. R., and Jenkin, M. E.: A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 2: Gas phase mechanism reduction, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7196–7204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.034</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 71b?><mixed-citation>Weber, J. and Bannan, T.: Z2F Brazil Observational used for CRI-STRAT 2 Evaluation, Apollo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.65133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17863/CAM.65133</ext-link>, last access: 9 April 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 77?><mixed-citation>Weber, J., Shin, Y. M., Staunton Sykes, J., Archer-Nicholls, S., Abraham, N. L., and Archibald, A. T.: Minimal Climate Impacts From Short-Lived Climate Forcers Following Emission Reductions Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090326, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090326" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL090326</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>Weber, J., Archer-Nicholls, S., Griffiths, P., Berndt, T., Jenkin, M., Gordon, H., Knote, C., and Archibald, A. T.: CRI-HOM: A novel chemical mechanism for simulating highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) in global chemistry–aerosol–climate models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10889–10910, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10889-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-10889-2020</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation>Wells, K. C., Millet, D. B., Payne, V. H., Deventer, M. J., Bates, K. H., de Gouw, J. A., Graus, M., Warneke, C., Wisthaler, A., and Fuentes, J. D.: Satellite isoprene retrievals constrain emissions and atmospheric oxidation, Nature, 585, 225–233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2664-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-2664-3</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5268?><ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 74?><mixed-citation>Wennberg, P. O., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Dodson, L. G., McVay, R. C., Mertens, L. A., Nguyen, T. B., Praske, E., Schwantes, R. H., Smarte, M. D., and St Clair, J. M.: Gas-phase reactions of isoprene and its major oxidation products, Chem. Rev., 118, 3337–3390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 75a?><mixed-citation>Whalley, L. K., Edwards, P. M., Furneaux, K. L., Goddard, A., Ingham, T., Evans, M. J., Stone, D., Hopkins, J. R., Jones, C. E., Karunaharan, A., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Monks, P. S., Moller, S. J., and Heard, D. E.: Quantifying the magnitude of a missing hydroxyl radical source in a tropical rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7223–7233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 75c?><mixed-citation>Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: Acetone canopy gradient concentration, ATTO [data set], available at: <uri>https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/72</uri> (last access: 1 April 2021), 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 75d?><mixed-citation>Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: Isoprene canopy gradient concentration, ATTO [data set], available at: <uri>https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/73</uri> (last access: 1 April 2021), 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 75e?><mixed-citation>Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: Isoprene oxidation products canopy gradient concentration, ATTO [data set], available at: <uri>https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/74</uri> (last access: 1 April 2021), 2020c.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 75f?><mixed-citation>Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: Monoterpenes canopy gradient concentration, ATTO [data set], available at: <uri>https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/77</uri> (last access: 1 April 2021), 2020d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 75b?><mixed-citation>Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Nölscher, A. C., Williams, J., Wolff, S., Alves, E., Martins, G. A., Bourtsoukidis, E., Brito, J., Jardine, K., Artaxo, P., and Kesselmeier, J.: Diel and seasonal changes of biogenic volatile organic compounds within and above an Amazonian rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3359–3378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 75c?><mixed-citation>Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., and Tilmes, S.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends, Elementa, 6, 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.265</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 75d?><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Shrivastava, M., Donahue, N. M., Gordon, H., Schervish, M., Shilling, J. E., Zaveri, R. A., Wang, J., Andreae, M. O., Zhao, C., and Gaudet, B.: High concentration of ultrafine particles in the Amazon free troposphere produced by organic new particle formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 25344–25351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006716117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2006716117</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Improvements to the representation of BVOC chemistry–climate interactions in UKCA (v11.5) with the CRI-Strat 2 mechanism: incorporation and evaluation</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>We present the first incorporation of the Common Representative
Intermediates version 2.2 tropospheric chemistry mechanism, CRI v2.2,
combined with stratospheric chemistry, into the global chemistry–climate
United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosols (UKCA) model to give the CRI-Strat 2
mechanism. A rigorous comparison of CRI-Strat 2 with the earlier version,
CRI-Strat, is performed in UKCA in addition to an evaluation of three
mechanisms, CRI-Strat 2, CRI-Strat and the standard UKCA chemical mechanism,
StratTrop v1.0, against a wide array of surface and airborne chemical data.</p><p>CRI-Strat 2 comprises a state-of-the-art isoprene scheme, optimized against
the Master Chemical Mechanism v3.3.1, which includes isoprene peroxy radical isomerization,
HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> recycling through the addition of photolabile hydroperoxy aldehydes
(HPALDs), and isoprene epoxy diol (IEPOX) formation. CRI-Strat 2 also features updates to several
rate constants for the inorganic chemistry, including the reactions of
inorganic nitrogen and O(<sup>1</sup>D).</p><p>The update to the isoprene chemistry in CRI-Strat 2 increases OH over the
lowest 500&thinsp;m in tropical forested regions by 30&thinsp;%–50&thinsp;% relative to
CRI-Strat, leading to an improvement in model–observation comparisons for
surface OH and isoprene relative to CRI-Strat and StratTrop. Enhanced
oxidants also cause a 25&thinsp;% reduction in isoprene burden and an increase in
oxidation fluxes of isoprene and other biogenic volatile organic compounds
(BVOCs) at low altitudes with likely impacts on subsequent aerosol formation, atmospheric
lifetime, and climate.</p><p>By contrast, updates to the rate constants of O(<sup>1</sup>D) with its main
reactants relative to CRI-Strat reduces OH in much of the free troposphere,
producing a 2&thinsp;% increase in the methane lifetime, and increases the
tropospheric ozone burden by 8&thinsp;%, primarily from reduced loss via
O(<sup>1</sup>D) + H<sub>2</sub>O. The changes to inorganic nitrogen reaction rate
constants increase the NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> burden by 4&thinsp;% and shift the distribution
of nitrated species closer to that simulated by StratTrop.</p><p>CRI-Strat 2 is suitable for multi-decadal model integrations and the
improved representation of isoprene chemistry provides an opportunity to
explore the consequences of HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> recycling in the United Kingdom Earth
System Model (UKESM1). This new mechanism will enable a re-evaluation of the
impact of BVOCs on the chemical composition of the atmosphere and further probe
the feedback between the biosphere and the climate.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Cresswell, P., Cusworth, S., Dalvi, M., Matthews, D., Wardle, S., and Whitehouse, S.: Using a virtual machine environment for developing, testing, and training for the UM-UKCA composition-climate model, using Unified Model version 10.9 and above, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3647–3657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Allan, J. D., Morgan, W. T., Darbyshire, E., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Oram, D. E., Artaxo, P., Brito, J., Lee, J. D., and Coe, H.: Airborne observations of IEPOX-derived isoprene SOA in the Amazon during SAMBBA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11393–11407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11393-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Archibald, A. T., Levine, J. G., Abraham, N. L., Cooke, M. C., Edwards, P. M., Heard, D. E., Jenkin, M. E., Karunaharan, A., Pike, R. C., Monks, P. S., and Shallcross, D. E.: Impacts of HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> regeneration and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene: Consequences for the composition of past, present and future atmospheres, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046520" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046520</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Archibald, A. T., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Archer-Nicholls, S., Chipperfield, M. P., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Dennison, F., Dhomse, S. S., Griffiths, P. T., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Hill, R. S., Johnson, C. E., Keeble, J., Köhler, M. O., Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J. P., Ordóñez, C., Pope, R. J., Rumbold, S. T., Russo, M. R., Savage, N. H., Sellar, A., Stringer, M., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., and Zeng, G.: Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1223–1266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation> Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y. F., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R. G., Deushi, M., and Finco, A.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment ReportA critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 8, 034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation> Archer-Nicholls, S., Abraham, N. L., Shin, Y. M., Weber, J., Russo, M. R., Lowe, D., Utembe, S., O'Connor, F. M., Kerridge, B., Latter, B., and Siddans, R.: The Common Representative Intermediates Mechanism version 2 in the United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosols Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002420" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002420</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Bates, K. H. and Jacob, D. J.: A new model mechanism for atmospheric oxidation of isoprene: global effects on oxidants, nitrogen oxides, organic products, and secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9613–9640, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9613-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9613-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Butler, T. M., Taraborrelli, D., Brühl, C., Fischer, H., Harder, H., Martinez, M., Williams, J., Lawrence, M. G., and Lelieveld, J.: Improved simulation of isoprene oxidation chemistry with the ECHAM5/MESSy chemistry-climate model: lessons from the GABRIEL airborne field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4529–4546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4529-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4529-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, J.: Merged data file for SEAC4RS, Flight 01 (20130806), on the dc8 platform, NASA [data set], available at: <a href="https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/seac4rs?MERGE=1#60_SECOND.DC8_MRG" target="_blank"/> (last access: 9 April 2021), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Chen, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., and Peng, Y.: New understanding and quantification of the regime dependence of aerosol-cloud interaction for studying aerosol indirect effects, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 1780–1787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067683" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067683</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Claeys, M. and Maenhaut, W.: Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Isoprene: Selected Research, Historic Account and State of the Art, Atmosphere, 12, 728, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060728" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060728</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, W. J., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Eyring, V., Hegglin, M. I., Maycock, A., Myhre, G., Prather, M., Shindell, D., and Smith, S. J.: AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 585–607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Crounse, J. D., Paulot, F., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Wennberg, P. O.: Peroxy radical isomerization in the oxidation of isoprene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 13607–13613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP21330J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP21330J</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Edwards, P. M., Evans, M. J., Furneaux, K. L., Hopkins, J., Ingham, T., Jones, C., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Moller, S. J., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., and Heard, D. E.: OH reactivity in a South East Asian tropical rainforest during the Oxidant and Particle Photochemical Processes (OP3) project, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9497–9514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9497-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9497-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Gordon, H., Sengupta, K., Rap, A., Duplissy, J., Frege, C., Williamson, C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., and Tröstl, J.: Reduced anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing caused by biogenic new particle formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 12053–12058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602360113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602360113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Griffiths, P. T., Murray, L. T., Zeng, G., Shin, Y. M., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Deushi, M., Emmons, L. K., Galbally, I. E., Hassler, B., Horowitz, L. W., Keeble, J., Liu, J., Moeini, O., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Oshima, N., Tarasick, D., Tilmes, S., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., Young, P. J., and Zanis, P.: Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4187–4218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Heinritzi, M., Dada, L., Simon, M., Stolzenburg, D., Wagner, A. C., Fischer, L., Ahonen, L. R., Amanatidis, S., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bauer, P. S., Baumgartner, B., Bianchi, F., Brilke, S., Chen, D., Chiu, R., Dias, A., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Fuchs, C., Garmash, O., Gordon, H., Granzin, M., El Haddad, I., He, X., Helm, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kangasluoma, J., Keber, T., Kim, C., Kürten, A., Lamkaddam, H., Laurila, T. M., Lampilahti, J., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Makhmutov, V., Manninen, H. E., Marten, R., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Mentler, B., Molteni, U., Müller, T., Nie, W., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Passananti, M., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Pospisilova, V., Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M. P., Rose, C., Schobesberger, S., Scholz, W., Scholze, K., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Volkamer, R., Wagner, R., Wang, M., Weitz, L., Wimmer, D., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Zha, Q., Zhou, X., Amorim, A., Baltensperger, U., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Tomé, A., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., and Curtius, J.: Molecular understanding of the suppression of new-particle formation by isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11809–11821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11809-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11809-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Hewitt, C. N., Lee, J. D., MacKenzie, A. R., Barkley, M. P., Carslaw, N., Carver, G. D., Chappell, N. A., Coe, H., Collier, C., Commane, R., Davies, F., Davison, B., DiCarlo, P., Di Marco, C. F., Dorsey, J. R., Edwards, P. M., Evans, M. J., Fowler, D., Furneaux, K. L., Gallagher, M., Guenther, A., Heard, D. E., Helfter, C., Hopkins, J., Ingham, T., Irwin, M., Jones, C., Karunaharan, A., Langford, B., Lewis, A. C., Lim, S. F., MacDonald, S. M., Mahajan, A. S., Malpass, S., McFiggans, G., Mills, G., Misztal, P., Moller, S., Monks, P. S., Nemitz, E., Nicolas-Perea, V., Oetjen, H., Oram, D. E., Palmer, P. I., Phillips, G. J., Pike, R., Plane, J. M. C., Pugh, T., Pyle, J. A., Reeves, C. E., Robinson, N. H., Stewart, D., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., and Yin, X.: Overview: oxidant and particle photochemical processes above a south-east Asian tropical rainforest (the OP3 project): introduction, rationale, location characteristics and tools, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 169–199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-169-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-169-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Jenkin, M. E., Watson, L. A., Utembe, S. R., and Shallcross, D. E.: A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 1: Gas phase mechanism development, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7185–7195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.028</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> Jenkin, M. E., Young, J. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The MCM v3.3.1 degradation scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11433–11459, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> Jenkin, M. E., Khan, M. A. H., Shallcross, D. E., Bergström, R., Simpson, D., Murphy, K. L. C., and Rickard, A. R.: The CRI v2. 2 reduced degradation scheme for isoprene, Atmos. Environ., 212, 172–182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.055</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkin, M., Watson, L., Utembe, S., and Richard, A.: Chemical mechanistic information taken from the CRI mechanism, CRI v2.2 (Jenkin et al., 2019) [data set], available at the Master Chemical Mechanism and CRI websites: <a href="http://mcm.york.ac.uk/" target="_blank"/> and <a href="http://cri.york.ac.uk/home.htt" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 July 2021), 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Jo, D. S., Hodzic, A., Emmons, L. K., Tilmes, S., Schwantes, R. H., Mills, M. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Hu, W., Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Singh, B., Lu, Z., Schulz, C., Schneider, J., Shilling, J. E., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Future changes in isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX SOA) under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: the importance of physicochemical dependency, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3395–3425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Karset, I. H. H., Berntsen, T. K., Storelvmo, T., Alterskjær, K., Grini, A., Olivié, D., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Iversen, T., and Schulz, M.: Strong impacts on aerosol indirect effects from historical oxidant changes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7669–7690, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7669-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7669-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation> Kelly, J. M., Doherty, R. M., O'Connor, F. M., and Mann, G. W.: The impact of biogenic, anthropogenic, and biomass burning volatile organic compound emissions on regional and seasonal variations in secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7393–7422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7393-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7393-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Khan, M. A. H., Schlich, B. L., Jenkin, M. E., Cooke, M. C., Derwent, R. G., Neu, J. L., Percival, C. J., and Shallcross, D. E.: Changes to simulated global atmospheric composition resulting from recent revisions to isoprene oxidation chemistry. Atmos. Environ., 244, 117914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117914" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117914</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation> Kiendler-Scharr, A., Wildt, J., Dal Maso, M., Hohaus, T., Kleist, E., Mentel, T. F., Tillmann, R., Uerlings, R., Schurr, U., and Wahner, A.: New particle formation in forests inhibited by isoprene emissions. Nature, 461, 381–384, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08292" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08292</a>, 2009, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation> Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson, C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., and Tröstl, J.: Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation> Lelieveld, J., Butler, T. M., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Fischer, H., Ganzeveld, L., Harder, H., Lawrence, M. G., Martinez, M., Taraborrelli, D., and Williams, J.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest, Nature, 452, 737–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation> Liu, Z., Nguyen, V. S., Harvey, J., Müller, J. F., and Peeters, J.: Theoretically derived mechanisms of HPALD photolysis in isoprene oxidation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 19, 9096–9106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP00288B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP00288B</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation> Makkonen, R., Asmi, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Boy, M., Arneth, A., Guenther, A., and Kulmala, M.: BVOC-aerosol-climate interactions in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5.5-HAM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10077–10096, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10077-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10077-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation> Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., Spracklen, D. V., Ridley, D. A., Manktelow, P. T., Chipperfield, M. P., Pickering, S. J., and Johnson, C. E.: Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 519–551, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> McFiggans, G., Mentel, T. F., Wildt, J., Pullinen, I., Kang, S., Kleist, E., Schmitt, S., Springer, M., Tillmann, R., Wu, C., and Zhao, D.: Secondary organic aerosol reduced by mixture of atmospheric vapours. Nature, 565, 587–593, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0871-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0871-y</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation> Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S., Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., and Baltensperger, U.: Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle formation under atmospheric conditions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6646–6651, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> Møller, K. H., Bates, K. H., and Kjaergaard, H. G.: The importance of peroxy radical hydrogen-shift reactions in atmospheric isoprene oxidation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 123, 920–932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b10432" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b10432</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Morgenstern, O., Braesicke, P., O'Connor, F. M., Bushell, A. C., Johnson, C. E., Osprey, S. M., and Pyle, J. A.: Evaluation of the new UKCA climate-composition model – Part 1: The stratosphere, Geosci. Model Dev., 2, 43–57, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-43-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-43-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation> Mulcahy, J. P., Johnson, C., Jones, C. G., Povey, A. C., Scott, C. E., Sellar, A., Turnock, S. T., Woodhouse, M. T., Abraham, N. L., Andrews, M. B., Bellouin, N., Browse, J., Carslaw, K. S., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Glover, M., Grosvenor, D. P., Hardacre, C., Hill, R., Johnson, B., Jones, A., Kipling, Z., Mann, G., Mollard, J., O'Connor, F. M., Palmiéri, J., Reddington, C., Rumbold, S. T., Richardson, M., Schutgens, N. A. J., Stier, P., Stringer, M., Tang, Y., Walton, J., Woodward, S., and Yool, A.: Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6383–6423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation> Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., and Peeters, J.: Chemistry and deposition in the Model of Atmospheric composition at Global and Regional scales using Inversion Techniques for Trace gas Emissions (MAGRITTE v1.1) – Part 1: Chemical mechanism, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2307–2356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2307-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2307-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Natural Environment Research Council, Hewitt, N., Edwards, P., Helfter, C., Irwin, M., Karunaharan, A., Lee, J. D., Newton, H., Robinson, N., and Ryder, J.: OP3 Project: Airborne and Ground-based Meteorological Instruments Records as part of the Oxidant and Particle Photochemical Processes above a South-East Asian tropical rain forest, NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre [data set], available at: <a href="http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/9279c7e807a2ef0eb78a03c3821e62c4" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 March 2021), 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation> Nguyen, T. B., Coggon, M. M., Bates, K. H., Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H., Schilling, K. A., Loza, C. L., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organic aerosol formation from the reactive uptake of isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX) onto non-acidified inorganic seeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3497–3510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3497-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation> Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X., Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol formation in the atmosphere. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02001H</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation> Novelli, A., Vereecken, L., Bohn, B., Dorn, H.-P., Gkatzelis, G. I., Hofzumahaus, A., Holland, F., Reimer, D., Rohrer, F., Rosanka, S., Taraborrelli, D., Tillmann, R., Wegener, R., Yu, Z., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Wahner, A., and Fuchs, H.: Importance of isomerization reactions for OH radical regeneration from the photo-oxidation of isoprene investigated in the atmospheric simulation chamber SAPHIR, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3333–3355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3333-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3333-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation> O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Griffiths, P. T., Hardacre, C., Johnson, B. T., Kahana, R., Keeble, J., Kim, B., Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J. P., Richardson, M., Robertson, E., Seo, J., Shim, S., Teixeira, J. C., Turnock, S. T., Williams, J., Wiltshire, A. J., Woodward, S., and Zeng, G.: Assessment of pre-industrial to present-day anthropogenic climate forcing in UKESM1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1211–1243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1211-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1211-2021</a>, 2021
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Olivier, J. G. J., Peters, J., Granier, C., Petron, G., Muller, J.-F., and Wallens, S.: Present and future surface emissions of atmospheric compounds, POET Report #3, EU project EVK2-1999-00011, available at: <a href="http://www.aero.jussieu.fr/projet/ACCENT/Documents/del2_final.doc" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 August 2021), 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Pacifico, F., Folberth, G. A., Jones, C. D., Harrison, S. P., and Collins, W. J.: Sensitivity of biogenic isoprene emissions to past, present, and future environmental conditions and implications for atmospheric chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D22302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018276</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> Peeters, J., Nguyen, T. L., and Vereecken, L.: HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radical regeneration in the oxidation of isoprene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 5935–5939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B908511D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B908511D</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> Peeters, J., Müller, J. F., Stavrakou, T., and Nguyen, V. S.: Hydroxyl radical recycling in isoprene oxidation driven by hydrogen bonding and hydrogen tunneling: The upgraded LIM1 mechanism, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 8625–8643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5033146" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5033146</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> Prather, M. J.: Photolysis rates in correlated overlapping cloud fields: Cloud-J 7.3c, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2587–2595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2587-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2587-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation> Sander, R., Baumgaertner, A., Cabrera-Perez, D., Frank, F., Gromov, S., Grooß, J.-U., Harder, H., Huijnen, V., Jöckel, P., Karydis, V. A., Niemeyer, K. E., Pozzer, A., Riede, H., Schultz, M. G., Taraborrelli, D., and Tauer, S.: The community atmospheric chemistry box model CAABA/MECCA-4.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1365–1385, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1365-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1365-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Schwantes, R. H., Emmons, L. K., Orlando, J. J., Barth, M. C., Tyndall, G. S., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., St. Clair, J. M., Blake, D. R., Wisthaler, A., and Bui, T. P. V.: Comprehensive isoprene and terpene gas-phase chemistry improves simulated surface ozone in the southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3739–3776, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation> Scott, C. E., Rap, A., Spracklen, D. V., Forster, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Mann, G. W., Pringle, K. J., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lihavainen, H., and Tunved, P.: The direct and indirect radiative effects of biogenic secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 447–470, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-447-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-447-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation> Sellar, A. A., Walton, J., Jones, C. G., Wood, R., Abraham, N. L., Andrejczuk, M., Andrews, M. B., Andrews, T., Archibald, A. T., de Mora, L., and Dyson, H.: Implementation of UK Earth system models for CMIP6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS00194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001946" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001946</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation> Simon, M., Dada, L., Heinritzi, M., Scholz, W., Stolzenburg, D., Fischer, L., Wagner, A. C., Kürten, A., Rörup, B., He, X.-C., Almeida, J., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bauer, P. S., Beck, L., Bergen, A., Bianchi, F., Bräkling, S., Brilke, S., Caudillo, L., Chen, D., Chu, B., Dias, A., Draper, D. C., Duplissy, J., El-Haddad, I., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Gonzalez-Carracedo, L., Gordon, H., Granzin, M., Hakala, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C., Kong, W., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Manninen, H. E., Marie, G., Marten, R., Mentler, B., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Nie, W., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Philippov, M., Quéléver, L. L. J., Ranjithkumar, A., Rissanen, M. P., Schallhart, S., Schobesberger, S., Schuchmann, S., Shen, J., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Tomé, A. R., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, R., Wang, M., Wang, D. S., Wang, Y., Weber, S. K., Wu, Y., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Ye, Q., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Zhou, X., Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., and Curtius, J.: Molecular understanding of new-particle formation from <i>α</i>-pinene between −50 and +25&thinsp;°C, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9183–9207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9183-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9183-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation> Sindelarova, K., Granier, C., Bouarar, I., Guenther, A., Tilmes, S., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Kuhn, U., Stefani, P., and Knorr, W.: Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9317–9341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9317-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation> Sporre, M. K., Blichner, S. M., Schrödner, R., Karset, I. H. H., Berntsen, T. K., van Noije, T., Bergman, T., O'Donnell, D., and Makkonen, R.: Large difference in aerosol radiative effects from BVOC-SOA treatment in three Earth system models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8953–8973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8953-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8953-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation> Squire, O. J., Archibald, A. T., Griffiths, P. T., Jenkin, M. E., Smith, D., and Pyle, J. A.: Influence of isoprene chemical mechanism on modelled changes in tropospheric ozone due to climate and land use over the 21st century, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5123–5143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5123-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5123-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> Telford, P. J., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Braesicke, P., Dalvi, M., Morgenstern, O., O'Connor, F. M., Richards, N. A. D., and Pyle, J. A.: Implementation of the Fast-JX Photolysis scheme (v6.4) into the UKCA component of the MetUM chemistry-climate model (v7.3), Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 161–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-161-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-161-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation> Teng, A. P., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Isoprene peroxy radical dynamics, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 139, 5367–5377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12838</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation> Thornhill, G., Collins, W., Olivié, D., Skeie, R. B., Archibald, A., Bauer, S., Checa-Garcia, R., Fiedler, S., Folberth, G., Gjermundsen, A., Horowitz, L., Lamarque, J.-F., Michou, M., Mulcahy, J., Nabat, P., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Paulot, F., Schulz, M., Scott, C. E., Séférian, R., Smith, C., Takemura, T., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., and Weber, J.: Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1105–1126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation> Toon, O. B., Maring, H., Dibb, J., Ferrare, R., Jacob, D. J., Jensen, E. J., Luo, Z. J., Mace, G. G., Pan, L. L., Pfister, L., and Rosenlof, K. H.: Planning, implementation, and scientific goals of the Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) field mission, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 4967–5009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024297" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024297</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation> Twomey, S. J. A. E.: Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8, 1251–1256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation> Unger, N.: On the role of plant volatiles in anthropogenic global climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8563–8569, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061616</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation> Utembe, S. R., Cooke, M. C., Archibald, A. T., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Shallcross, D. E.: Using a reduced Common Representative Intermediates (CRIv2-R5) mechanism to simulate tropospheric ozone in a 3-D Lagrangian chemistry transport model, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1609–1622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.044</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Walters, D., Baran, A. J., Boutle, I., Brooks, M., Earnshaw, P., Edwards, J., Furtado, K., Hill, P., Lock, A., Manners, J., Morcrette, C., Mulcahy, J., Sanchez, C., Smith, C., Stratton, R., Tennant, W., Tomassini, L., Van Weverberg, K., Vosper, S., Willett, M., Browse, J., Bushell, A., Carslaw, K., Dalvi, M., Essery, R., Gedney, N., Hardiman, S., Johnson, B., Johnson, C., Jones, A., Jones, C., Mann, G., Milton, S., Rumbold, H., Sellar, A., Ujiie, M., Whitall, M., Williams, K., and Zerroukat, M.: The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1909–1963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation> Watson, L. A., Shallcross, D. E., Utembe, S. R., and Jenkin, M. E.: A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 2: Gas phase mechanism reduction, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7196–7204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.034</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Weber, J. and Bannan, T.: Z2F Brazil Observational used for CRI-STRAT 2 Evaluation, Apollo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.65133" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.65133</a>, last access: 9 April 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation> Weber, J., Shin, Y. M., Staunton Sykes, J., Archer-Nicholls, S., Abraham, N. L., and Archibald, A. T.: Minimal Climate Impacts From Short-Lived Climate Forcers Following Emission Reductions Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090326, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090326" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090326</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation> Weber, J., Archer-Nicholls, S., Griffiths, P., Berndt, T., Jenkin, M., Gordon, H., Knote, C., and Archibald, A. T.: CRI-HOM: A novel chemical mechanism for simulating highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) in global chemistry–aerosol–climate models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10889–10910, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10889-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10889-2020</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation> Wells, K. C., Millet, D. B., Payne, V. H., Deventer, M. J., Bates, K. H., de Gouw, J. A., Graus, M., Warneke, C., Wisthaler, A., and Fuentes, J. D.: Satellite isoprene retrievals constrain emissions and atmospheric oxidation, Nature, 585, 225–233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2664-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2664-3</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation> Wennberg, P. O., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Dodson, L. G., McVay, R. C., Mertens, L. A., Nguyen, T. B., Praske, E., Schwantes, R. H., Smarte, M. D., and St Clair, J. M.: Gas-phase reactions of isoprene and its major oxidation products, Chem. Rev., 118, 3337–3390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation> Whalley, L. K., Edwards, P. M., Furneaux, K. L., Goddard, A., Ingham, T., Evans, M. J., Stone, D., Hopkins, J. R., Jones, C. E., Karunaharan, A., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Monks, P. S., Moller, S. J., and Heard, D. E.: Quantifying the magnitude of a missing hydroxyl radical source in a tropical rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7223–7233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: Acetone canopy gradient concentration, ATTO [data set], available at: <a href="https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/72" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 April 2021), 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: Isoprene canopy gradient concentration, ATTO [data set], available at: <a href="https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/73" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 April 2021), 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: Isoprene oxidation products canopy gradient concentration, ATTO [data set], available at: <a href="https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/74" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 April 2021), 2020c.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: Monoterpenes canopy gradient concentration, ATTO [data set], available at: <a href="https://www.attodata.org/ddm/data/Showdata/77" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 April 2021), 2020d.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Yáñez-Serrano, A. M., Nölscher, A. C., Williams, J., Wolff, S., Alves, E., Martins, G. A., Bourtsoukidis, E., Brito, J., Jardine, K., Artaxo, P., and Kesselmeier, J.: Diel and seasonal changes of biogenic volatile organic compounds within and above an Amazonian rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3359–3378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3359-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., and Tilmes, S.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends, Elementa, 6, 10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B., Shrivastava, M., Donahue, N. M., Gordon, H., Schervish, M., Shilling, J. E., Zaveri, R. A., Wang, J., Andreae, M. O., Zhao, C., and Gaudet, B.: High concentration of ultrafine particles in the Amazon free troposphere produced by organic new particle formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 25344–25351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006716117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006716117</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
