<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-14-337-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Development of four-dimensional variational assimilation <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>system based on the GRAPES–CUACE adjoint model (GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var V1.0) and its <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>application in
emission inversion</article-title><alt-title>Development of GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var V1.0 and its
application</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Development of GRAPES--CUACE-4D-Var V1.0 and its
application}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C. Wang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Chao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>An</surname><given-names>Xingqin</given-names></name>
          <email>anxq@cma.gov.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>Qing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Zhaobin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0832-2891</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Yanjun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jiangtao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Atmospheric Composition and Environmental Meteorology,
Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Fudan University,
Shanghai 200438, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute of Urban Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration,
Beijing 100089, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Xingqin An (anxq@cma.gov.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>337</fpage><lpage>350</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e143">In this study, a four-dimensional variational (4D-Var) data
assimilation system was developed based on the GRAPES–CUACE (Global/Regional
Assimilation and PrEdiction System – CMA Unified Atmospheric
Chemistry Environmental Forecasting System) atmospheric
chemistry model, GRAPES–CUACE adjoint model and L-BFGS-B (extended limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno) algorithm
(GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var) and was applied to optimize black carbon (BC) daily
emissions in northern China on 4 July 2016, when a pollution event
occurred in Beijing. The results show that the newly constructed
GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system is feasible and can be applied to
perform BC emission inversion in northern China. The BC concentrations
simulated with optimized emissions show improved agreement with the
observations over northern China with lower root-mean-square errors and
higher correlation coefficients. The model biases are reduced by 20 %–46 %.
The validation with observations that were not utilized in the assimilation
shows that assimilation makes notable improvements, with values of the model
biases reduced by 1 %–36 %. Compared with the prior BC emissions, which are
based on statistical data of anthropogenic emissions for 2007, the optimized
emissions are considerably reduced. Especially for Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei,
Shandong, Shanxi and Henan, the ratios of the optimized emissions to prior
emissions are 0.4–0.8, indicating that the BC emissions in these highly
industrialized regions have greatly reduced from 2007 to 2016. In the
future, further studies on improving the performance of the GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var
assimilation system are still needed and are important for air pollution
research in China.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e155">Three-dimensional (3-D) atmospheric chemical transport models (CTMs) are
important tools for air quality research, which are used not only for
predicting spatial and temporal distributions of air pollutants but also
for providing sensitivities of air pollutant concentrations with respect to
various parameters (Hakami et al., 2007). Among several methods of
sensitivity analysis, the adjoint method is known to be an efficient means
of calculating the sensitivities of a cost function with respect to a large
number of input parameters (Sandu et al., 2005; Hakami et al., 2007; Henze
et al., 2007; Zhai et al., 2018). The sensitivity information provided by
the adjoint approach can be applied to a variety of optimization problems,
such as formulating optimized pollution-control strategies, inverse
modelling and variational data assimilation (Liu, 2005; Hakami et al.,
2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e158">Four-dimensional variational (4D-Var) data assimilation, which is an
important application of adjoint models, provides insight into various model
inputs, such as initial conditions and emissions (Liu, 2005; Yumimoto
and Uno, 2006). In the past decades, many scholars have successively
developed adjoint models of various 3-D CTMs and the 4D-Var data
assimilation systems to optimize model parameters. Elbern and Schmidt (1999, 2001), Elbern et al. (2000, 2007) constructed the adjoint of the EURAD CTM and performed
inverse modelling of emissions and chemical data assimilation. Sandu et al. (2005) built the adjoint of the comprehensive chemical transport model
STEM-III and conducted the data assimilation in a twin-experiment framework
as well as the assimilation of a real data set, with the control variables
being O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hakami et al. (2005) applied the adjoint model of
the STEM-2k1 model for assimilating black carbon (BC) concentrations and
the recovery of its emissions. Liu (2005) and Huang et al. (2018) developed the
adjoint of the CAMx model and further expanded it into an air quality
forecasting and pollution-control decision support system. Müller and
Stavrakou (2005) constructed an inverse modelling framework based on the
adjoint of the global model IMAGES and used it to optimize the global annual
CO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for the year 1997. More recently, the CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System) team
(Hakami et al., 2007) built the adjoint of CMAQ model and its 4D-Var
assimilation scheme, which were used to optimize NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Kurokawa et
al., 2009; Resler et al., 2010) and ozone initial state (Park et al., 2016).
The adjoints of the GEOS-Chem model and its 4D-Var assimilation system first developed by Henze et al. (2007, 2009) have been applied in a number of
studies to improve aerosol (Wang et al., 2012; Mao et al., 2015; Jeong and
Park, 2018), CO (Jiang et al., 2015) and NMVOC (non-methane volatile organic compound) (Cao et al., 2018) emission estimates. Zhang et al. (2016) applied the 4D-Var assimilation system using
the adjoint model of GEOS-Chem with the fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution to optimize daily aerosol primary and
precursor emissions over northern China. This research has laid good
foundations for developing adjoint models of CTMs and optimizing model
parameters. However, only a few of these adjoint models and their 4D-Var
assimilation systems have been widely applied to regional air pollution in
China. The development and applications of adjoint models of 3-D CTMs and
their 4D-Var data assimilation systems are still limited in China. Further
research and more attention are required.</p>
      <p id="d1e225">Nowadays, several mega urban agglomerations in China, such as the
Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, the Yangtze River Delta region and the Fenwei
Plain, are still suffering from severe air pollution (Zhang et al., 2019;
Xiang et al., 2020; Haque et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020). Previous studies
have shown that emission-reduction strategies, which are mainly based on the
results of atmospheric chemistry simulations, play an important role in
reducing pollutant concentrations and improving air quality (Zhang et al.,
2016; Zhai et al., 2016). The emission inventory represents important basic data
for atmospheric chemistry simulation, and its uncertainty will affect the
accuracy of air pollution simulation, which in turn will affect the accuracy
of pollution-control measures based on the model results (Huang et al.,
2018). In order to improve the accuracy of atmospheric chemistry simulation
and the feasibility of the pollution-control strategies, the emission data
obtained by the “bottom–up” method needs to be optimized, which can be
done through the atmospheric chemical variational assimilation system, to
reduce the impact of emission uncertainty.</p>
      <p id="d1e228">GRAPES–CUACE is an atmospheric chemistry model system developed by the
Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CAMS) (Gong and Zhang, 2008; Zhou
et al., 2008, 2012; Wang et al., 2010, 2015). GRAPES (Global/Regional
Assimilation and PrEdiction System) is a numerical weather prediction system
built by China Meteorological Administration (CMA), and it can be used as a
global model (GRAPES-GFS) or as a regional mesoscale model (GRAPES-Meso)
(Chen et al., 2008; Zhang and Shen, 2008). CUACE (CMA Unified Atmospheric
Chemistry Environmental Forecasting System) is a unified atmospheric
chemistry model constructed by CAMS to study both air quality forecasting
and climate change (Gong and Zhang, 2008; Zhou et al., 2008, 2012). Using the
meteorological fields provided by GRAPES-Meso, the GRAPES–CUACE model has
realized the online coupling of meteorology and chemistry (Gong and
Zhang, 2008; Zhou et al., 2008, 2012; Wang et al., 2010, 2015). The
GRAPES–CUACE model not only plays an important role in the scientific
research on air pollution in China (Gong and Zhang, 2008; Zhou et al.,
2008, 2012; Wang et al., 2010, 2015) but has also been officially in operation since 2014 at the National Meteorological Center of CMA for
providing guidance for air quality forecasting over China (Ke, 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e232">Recently, An et al. (2016) constructed the aerosol adjoint module of the GRAPES–CUACE model, which was subsequently applied in tracking
influential BC and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source areas in northern China (Zhai et al.,
2018; Wang et al., 2018a, 2018b, 2019). However, these applications of
GRAPES–CUACE aerosol adjoint model are still limited to sensitivity
analysis, and the sensitivity information is not fully used to solve various
optimization problems mentioned above. At the same time, considering the
current severe pollution situation in mega urban agglomerations in China,
more accurate emission data are urgently required to formulate reasonable
and effective pollution-control strategies. In this study, we developed a
new 4D-Var data assimilation system on the basis of the GRAPES–CUACE adjoint
model, which was applied for assimilating surface BC concentrations and
optimizing its daily emissions in northern China on 4 July 2016, when a
pollution event occurred in Beijing. The following part is divided into four
sections. Section 2 introduces the data and methods, Sect. 3 describes the
GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system, Sect. 4 presents the results and
discussions, and the conclusions are found in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Forward model description</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>GRAPES-Meso</title>
      <p id="d1e266">GRAPES-Meso is a real-time operational weather forecasting model used by
China Meteorological Administration (Chen et al., 2008; Zhang and Shen,
2008). The GRAPES-Meso model uses fully compressible non-hydrostatic
equations as its model core. The vertical coordinates adopt the
height-based, terrain-following coordinates, and the horizontal coordinates
use the spherical coordinates of equal longitude–latitude grid points. The
horizontal discretization adopts an Arakawa-C staggered grid arrangement and
a central finite-difference scheme with second-order accuracy, while the
vertical discretization adopts the vertically staggered variable arrangement
proposed by Charney-Phillips  (Charney and Phillips, 1953). The time integration discretization uses a
semi-implicit and semi-Lagrangian temporal advection scheme. The large-scale
transport processes (both horizontal and vertical) for all gases and
aerosols in GRAPES–CUACE are calculated by the dynamic framework of
GRAPES-Meso, which implements the quasi-monotone semi-Lagrangian (QMSL)
semi-implicit scheme on each grid (Wang et al., 2010). The physical
processes principally involve microphysical precipitation, cumulus
convection, radiative transfer, land surface and boundary layer processes.
Each physical process incorporates several schemes and can also be tailored
by the user (Xu et al., 2008). The major physical options that we selected
include the WSM6 cloud microphysics scheme (Hong and Lim, 2006), the
Betts–Miller–Janjic cumulus convection scheme (Betts and Miller, 1986; Janjić, 1994), the RRTM (Rapid Radiative Transfer Model; Mlawer et al., 1997)
long-wave radiation scheme, the short-wave scheme based on Dudhia (1989),
the Monin–Obukhov surface layer scheme (Monin and Obukhov, 1954), the MRF  (medium-range forecast) planetary boundary layer scheme (Hong and Pan, 1996) and the Noah land surface scheme (Chen et al., 1996).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>CUACE</title>
      <p id="d1e277">The atmospheric chemistry model CUACE mainly includes three modules: the
aerosol module (module_ae_cam), the gaseous
chemistry module (module_gas_radm) and the
thermodynamic equilibrium module (module_isopia) (Gong and
Zhang, 2008; Zhou et al., 2008, 2012; Wang et al., 2010, 2015). The
interface program that connects CUACE and GRAPES-Meso is called
aerosol_driver.F. This program transmits the meteorological
fields calculated in GRAPES-Meso and the emission data processed as needed
to each module of CUACE. The physical and chemical processes of 66 gas
species and 7 aerosol species (sulfate, nitrate, sea salt, black carbon,
organic carbon, soil dust and ammonium) in the atmosphere are
comprehensively considered in the CUACE model (Wang et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e280">CUACE adopts CAM (Canadian Aerosol Module; Gong et al., 2003) and RADM II
(the second-generation Regional Acid Deposition Model; Stockwell et al.,
1990) as its aerosol module and gaseous chemistry module, respectively. CAM
involves six types of aerosols: sulfate (SF), nitrate (NI), sea salt (SS),
BC, organic carbon (OC) and soil dust (SD), which are segregated
into 12 size bins with diameter ranging from 0.01 to 40.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according
to the multiphase multicomponent aerosol particle size separation algorithm
(Gong et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2008, 2012; Wang et al., 2010, 2015). CAM
also calculates the vertical diffusion trend of aerosol particles by solving
the vertical diffusion equation. The core of CAM is the aerosol physical and
chemical processes, including hygroscopic growth, coagulation, nucleation,
condensation, dry deposition or sedimentation, below-cloud scavenging, and
aerosol activation, which is coherently integrated with the gaseous
chemistry in CUACE (Gong et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2008, 2012; Wang et al.,
2010, 2015). The gas chemistry provides the production rates of sulfate
aerosols and secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) and meanwhile generates an
oxidation background for aqueous-phase aerosol chemistry, in which sulfate
transformation changes the distributions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in clouds (Zhou et al.,
2012). Both nucleation and condensation are considered for sulfate aerosol
formation depending on the atmospheric state after gaseous H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
formed from the oxidation of sulfurous gases such as SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S and
DMS (dimethyl sulfide) (Zhou et al., 2012). Secondary organic aerosols as generated from gaseous
precursors are partitioned into different bins through condensation using
the same approach as the gaseous H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> condensation to sulfate
(Zhou et al., 2012). Given that the NIs and ammonium (AM) formed
through the gaseous oxidation are unstable and prone to further
decomposition back to their precursors, CUACE adopts ISORROPIA to calculate
the thermodynamic equilibrium between them and their gas precursors (West et
al., 1998; Nenes et al., 1998a, b; Zhou et al., 2012). ISORROPIA
contains 15 equilibrium reactions, and the main species include the gas phase (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCL, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O), liquid phase (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and solid
phase ((NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H(SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl, NaCl,
NaNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NaHSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Nenes et al., 1998a).</p>
      <p id="d1e619">The emissions used in this study are based on statistical data of
anthropogenic emissions reported from government agencies for 2007 (Cao et
al., 2011). Emission source types included residences, industry, power
plants, transportation, biomass combustion, livestock and poultry breeding,
fertilizer use, waste disposal, solvent use, and light industrial product
manufacturing (Cao et al., 2011; Zhai et al., 2018). These emission data
were transformed through the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE)
module into hourly gridded off-line data for 32 species, including BC, OC,
SF, NI, fugitive dust particles and 19 non-methane volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, at
three vertical levels (non-point source on the ground, middle-elevation
point source at 50 m and high-elevation point source at 120 m), as required by
the GRAPES–CUACE model. Furthermore, natural sea salt and natural sand or dust
emissions were also calculated online in the model (Zhou et al., 2012; Zhai
et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Adjoint model</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Adjoint theory</title>
      <p id="d1e683">Assuming that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is a linear operator defined in
the Hilbert space <bold>H</bold>, if there is another linear operator
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> satisfying
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M47" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is called the adjoint
operator of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ye and Shen, 2006). Where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the inner product in <bold>H</bold>. If
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are continuous functions on a domain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
inner product is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are discrete vectors,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then the inner product is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denote vectors and <bold>L</bold> is a matrix
(independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), we can obtain
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M61" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            In other words, for a matrix-type linear operator, the adjoint operator is
its transpose: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Liu, 2005).</p>
      <p id="d1e1074">An atmospheric chemistry model can be viewed as a numerical operator
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be
expressed as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M64" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are vectors
representing the input and output variables in the atmospheric chemistry
model, respectively. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is differentiable, then the
differential of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be denoted by the differential
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the tangent linear model (TLM) of the
atmospheric chemistry model can be expressed as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M72" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are input and output variables in the TLM, respectively, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Jacobian matrix.</p>
      <p id="d1e1273">According to Eqs. (1) and (2), the adjoint model of the TLM can be expressed
as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are input and output variables in the adjoint model,
respectively. Comparing Eqs. (4) and (5), it can be seen that the dimensions
of input and output are exchanged between the TLM and the adjoint model, and
the operator in Eq. (5) is the transpose of the operator in Eq. (4) (Liu,
2005). It is easy to see that the gradient (sensitivity) of the objective
function with respect to input variables can be obtained through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> times TLM
simulations or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> times adjoint simulations. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dimensional emission sources and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dimensional pollutant
concentrations), the calculation efficiency of the adjoint model is much
higher than that of the TLM (Liu, 2005).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>GRAPES–CUACE aerosol adjoint</title>
      <p id="d1e1400">The GRAPES–CUACE aerosol adjoint model was constructed by An et al. (2016)
based on the adjoint theory (Ye and Shen, 2006; Liu, 2005) and the CUACE
aerosol module, which mainly includes the adjoint of physical and chemical
processes and flux calculation processes of six types of aerosols (SF, NI,
SS, BC, OC and SD) in the CAM module, the adjoint of interface programs that
connect GRAPES-Meso and CUACE, and the adjoint of aerosol transport
processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e1403">As described in An et al. (2016), after the construction of the adjoint
model is completed, its accuracy must be verified to confirm its
reliability. Since the adjoint model is built on the basis of the TLM, the
validity of the TLM must be ensured before the accuracy of the adjoint model
is tested. The verification formula of tangent linear codes can be expressed
as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M84" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Index</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where the denominator is the TLM output, and the numerator is the difference
between the output value of the original model with input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is necessary to decrease the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by an equal
ratio and repeat the calculation of the above formula. If the result
approaches 1.0, the tangent linear codes are correct. It was verified that
all input variables in the model, such as the concentration value of
pollutants (xrow) and the particle's wet radius (rhop), have passed the TLM
test.</p>
      <p id="d1e1494">The adjoint codes can be validated on the basis of the correct tangent
linear codes. The adjoint codes and the tangent linear codes need to satisfy
Eq. (2) for all possible combinations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Eq. (2), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the tangent linear process and the adjoint process,
respectively. To simplify the testing process, the adjoint input is the
tangent linear output: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, Eq. (5) can be expressed as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M93" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            By substituting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the tangent linear codes, the output value
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be obtained and the left part of the
equation can be computed. Then, taking <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the
input of the adjoint codes, the adjoint output <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be obtained and the right part of
the equation can be calculated. On condition that the left and right sides
of Eq. (7) are equal within the range of machine errors, the constructed
adjoint model is validated. It was verified that all input variables in the
model have passed the adjoint test. Taking the pollutant concentration
variable (xrow) as an example, both sides of Eq. (7) produce values with 14
identical significant digits or more. This result is within the range of
machine errors, so the values of the left and the right sides are considered
equal. Thus, the pollutant concentration variable (xrow) has passed the
adjoint test.</p>
      <p id="d1e1683">After the TLM and the adjoint model were verified, the GRAPES–CUACE aerosol
adjoint model was constructed. The operation flowchart of the adjoint model
is shown in Fig. 1. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the objective function, which can be defined
according to the problems concerned. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent state variables (such
as BC concentration) and control variables (such as emission sources, mainly
including VOCs, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PPM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the model,
respectively. First of all, the GRAPES–CUACE atmospheric chemistry model
should be integrated to store the basic-state values of the unequilibrated
variables in checkpoint files. The intermediate values are recalculated or
saved in stack using the PUSH&amp;POP method, which pushes the intermediate values into a continuous memory space and pops them out where needed, during the adjoint operating
process. Subsequently, the gradient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as the saved basic-state values are taken as input data for
the adjoint backward integration. Finally, the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be obtained. A full description of the
construction, framework and operational flowchart of the GRAPES–CUACE
aerosol adjoint model can be found in An et al. (2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1806">Running process of GRAPES–CUACE atmospheric chemistry model and
its adjoint model.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/337/2021/gmd-14-337-2021-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>L-BFGS-B method</title>
      <p id="d1e1824">The limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno algorithm (L-BFGS) is an optimization algorithm in the family of
quasi-Newton methods that approximates the BFGS using a limited amount
of computer memory (Liu and Nocedal, 1989). The L-BFGS-B algorithm extends
L-BFGS to solve large nonlinear optimization problems subject to simple
bounds on the variables (Byrd et al., 1995; Zhu et al., 1997), which can be
expressed as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" specific-use="align" content-type="subnumberedsingle"><mml:math id="M111" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8.9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8a</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8.10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8b</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>subject to</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a nonlinear function, the vectors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent lower and upper
bounds on the variables, and the number of variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed to be
large. The algorithm is also appropriate and efficient for solving
unconstrained problems in which the variables have no bounds. With the
supply of the objective function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and its gradient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but with no requirement
of knowledge about the Hessian matrix of the objective function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
algorithm can be useful for solving large problems where the Hessian matrix
is difficult to compute or is dense.</p>
      <p id="d1e1937">The brief procedure of the L-BFGS-B algorithm is as follows. At each
iteration, a limited memory BFGS approximation to the Hessian is updated.
The limited memory BFGS matrix is used to define a quadratic model of the
objective function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. A search direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is computed by a two-stage
approach. First, use the gradient projection method to identify a set of
active variables, such as variables that will be held at their bounds. Then,
the quadratic model is approximately minimized with respect to the free
variables. The search direction is defined to be the vector leading from the
current iterate to this approximate minimizer. Finally, a line search is
performed along the search direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to compute a step length
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the variables are updated through
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The L-BFGS-B algorithm has
three termination criteria: the number of iterations reaches the set maximum
value; the change of the objective function in consecutive iterations is
relatively small; and the modulus of the projected gradient is small enough.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Description of GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var</title>
      <p id="d1e2024">The new 4D-Var data assimilation system, GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var, was
constructed on the basis of the GRAPES–CUACE atmospheric chemistry model,
the GRAPES–CUACE aerosol adjoint model and the L-BFGS-B method. A schematic diagram
of GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var is shown in Fig. 2. The main parts of
GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var include GRAPES–CUACE atmospheric chemistry simulation,
during which the basic-state values of the unequilibrated variables in
checkpoint files are saved, observations and adjoint forcing term
processing, GRAPES–CUACE aerosol adjoint model simulation, gradient
extraction, cost function calculation, and optimization. The details of cost
function, observations and optimization of emission inversion are as
follows.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2029">GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/337/2021/gmd-14-337-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Cost function</title>
      <p id="d1e2045">Based on Bayesian theory and the assumption of Gaussian error distributions
(Rodgers, 2000) the cost function of the emission inversion is generally
defined as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M124" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which we sought to optimize, generally represents the state
vector of emissions or their scaling factors, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the prior
estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the error covariance estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the forward model, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vector of measurements that are distributed
during the time interval [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the observation error
covariance matrix, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the regularization parameter.</p>
      <p id="d1e2274">In this study, we followed the method in Henze et al. (2009), and defined
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the state vector of scaling factors of BC emissions:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M137" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the state vector of the daily gridded emissions of BC at three
vertical levels (non-point source on the ground, middle-elevation point
source at 50 m and high-elevation point source at 120 m) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
prior estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the prior estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is equal to 0. According to Cao et al. (2011), the
uncertainty of prior BC emissions used in this study is 76.2 %.
Therefore, we assigned the prior error covariance matrix (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to be diagonal
and the uncertainty to be 76.2 % for BC emissions. Due to the lack of
information to completely construct a physically representative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
regularization parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is introduced to balance the
background and observation terms in the cost function. As described in Henze
et al. (2009), an optimal value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be found with the
L-curve method (Hansen, 1998). Here, we followed this method and obtained
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through several emission inversions with a range
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (10, 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, 0.00001, 0.000001,
0.0000001).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Observations</title>
      <p id="d1e2407">The surface measurements of BC were collected from the China Atmosphere Watch
Network (CAWNET). The CAWNET was established by the China Meteorological
Administration to monitor the BC surface mass concentration over China in
2004 and had 54 monitoring stations in the summer of 2016. The monitoring
of BC was conducted by an aethalometer (Model AE 31, Magee Scientific Co.,
USA), which uses a continuous optical greyscale measurement method to
produce real-time BC data (Gong et al., 2019). In this study, we used the
recommended mass absorption coefficient for the instrument at an 880 nm
wavelength with 24 h mean values of BC during  1–31 July 2016 at five representative stations of CAWNET in northern China (Fig. S1 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e2410">The surface PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were obtained from the public website
of the China Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) (<uri>http://www.mee.gov.cn/</uri>, last access: 14 January 2021). The network started to release real-time hourly
concentrations of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 74 major Chinese cities in January 2013, which further
increased to 338 cities in 2016. The PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data were collected by the
TEOM1405-F monitor, which draws ambient air through a sample filter at
constant flow rate, continuously weighing the filter and calculates the near
real-time mass concentration of the collected particulate matter. We used
hourly surface PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for  1–31 July 2016 at 48 cities in
northern China, including 12 cities in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region
(Fig. S1). Here, we have averaged PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at several
monitoring sites in each city to represent a regional condition.</p>
      <p id="d1e2498">To improve the performance of emission inversion, adequate observations are
needed for constraining the model. Due to the limited BC monitoring sites in
northern China, we used the surface PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at 48 cities
described above and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio to obtain the hourly BC
concentrations for  1–31 July 2016 at 48 cities in northern China. The detailed
calculation process can be found in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e2525">The observation error covariance matrix (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is difficult to quantify,
generally includes contributions from the measurement error, the
representation error and the forward model error (Henze et al., 2009; Zhang
et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2018). And there is also a certain error in
calculating the BC concentration based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. To
reflect the possibly large uncertainties of the observation, we assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to
be diagonal and with error of 100 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Optimization</title>
      <p id="d1e2565">Minimization of the cost function Eq. (9) is performed through optimization.
Starting from an initial guess (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> equal to 0), the forward model
simulates BC concentrations at each integration step during the time
interval [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], and the adjoint model, which is driven by the
discrepancy between simulated and observed BC concentrations, calculates the
gradients of the cost function with respect to the scaling factors of BC
emission (Fig. 2). Subsequently, the gradients are supplied to the L-BFGS-B
optimization routine (Byrd et al., 1995; Zhu et al., 1997) to minimize the
cost function iteratively (Fig. 2). At each iteration, the improved estimates
of the scaling factors are implemented and the forward and adjoint models
are integrated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Setup of emission inversion experiment</title>
      <p id="d1e2605">The simulation domain in this study is northern China (105–125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 32.25–43.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; Fig. S1),
covering <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal grids with a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and vertically divided into 31 layers with an integration time step of 300 s. The National Centers for Environmental Prediction Final (FNL) Analysis dataset at a 6 h interval is used as
meteorological input. The prior emission used here is the daily gridded BC
emission at three vertical levels (non-point source on the ground, middle-elevation point source at 50 m and high-elevation point source at 120 m)
mentioned above. The results calculated by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio show that
the BC concentration in Beijing was high on 4 July 2016. So the
assimilation window is from 20:00 CST, 3 July, to 19:00 CST, 4 July 2016. The hourly BC concentrations at 36 cities during this time
interval are used for the emission inversion, and the BC concentrations of
the remaining 12 cities are used for validation of the inversion effect
(Fig. S1). The simulation is initialized at 20:00 CST, 30 June; the first
3 d are set as the spin-up time. The convergence criterion used in
the optimization is that the objective function decreases by less than 1 %
in consecutive iterations. According to the maximum estimation range of the
prior emissions, here the upper and lower bounds of the scaling factors of
BC emissions are ln(1.6) and ln(0.4), respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Comparisons between the simulated and observed concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e2689">The progression of the cost function at iteration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the
optimization procedure is shown in Fig. 3. The cost function quickly reduces
and reaches the convergence criterion after eight iterations, with values of the
converged cost function reduced by 37 %.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2719">Cost function reduction.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/337/2021/gmd-14-337-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2730">The spatial distribution of observed and simulated daily BC
concentrations on 4 July 2016. The observations (circles) are
overplotted over model simulations with the <bold>(a, c)</bold> prior and <bold>(b, d)</bold> optimized emissions. The observations at 36 cities in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> were used in
the assimilation, and the observations at 12 cities in <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> were not used
in the assimilation. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) and correlation
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) between observation and simulation are shown as insets. The
observed BC concentrations were calculated by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio method.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/337/2021/gmd-14-337-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2781">Figure 4 shows the spatial distribution of observed and simulated daily BC
concentrations on 4 July 2016. In general, the results simulated with
the prior emission reflect the distribution characteristics of BC
concentration in northern China to a certain extent, with high values mainly located in Beijing and central and southern Hebei and low values mainly located in Inner Mongolia and eastern Shandong. However, the
differences between the simulated and the observed BC concentrations are
considerable, and almost all are over-predictions. The optimized
(posterior) emissions compensate for the over-predictions and largely reduce the model biases. For instance, the model biases for BC in Beijing, Tianjin,
Shijiazhuang, Jinan, Taiyuan and Zhengzhou are reduced by 46 % (from 5.4
to 2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), 26 % (from 6.6 to 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), 29 %
(from 18.4 to 13.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), 20 % (from 6.6 to 5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), 34 % (from 4.1 to 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 20 % (from 6.9 to
5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively (Fig. 4a, b). The results simulated with
the optimized emission also show improved agreement with the observations
over northern China with lower root-mean-square errors and higher
correlation coefficients (Fig. 4a, b).</p>
      <p id="d1e2900">It is crucial to validate the assimilation results by observations that were
not utilized in the assimilation. The BC concentrations at 12 cities were
used for validation (Fig. 4c, d). Assimilation compensates for over-predictions,
reduces the root-mean-square errors (from 5.2 to 4.4) and improves the
correlation coefficients (from 8.6 to 8.7). The model biases for BC in
Hengshui and Yizhou are reduced by 28 % (from 7.2 to 5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and 36 % (from 3.9 to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. The improvements
of the remaining 10 cities are also notable, with values of the model biases
reduced by 1 %–20 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Comparisons between the prior and optimized BC emissions</title>
      <p id="d1e2949">Figure 5 shows the spatial distributions of the prior and optimized daily BC
emissions, which are at three vertical levels (non-point source on the
ground, middle-elevation point source at 50 m and high-elevation point
source at 120 m) as required by the GRAPES–CUACE model. The BC emissions on
the ground are mostly non-point sources and at 50 m are concentrated middle-elevation sources; therefore they are distributed in a large area (Fig. 5a, c), while the BC emissions at 120 m are mainly from a few high-elevation
point sources, so they are scattered in the area (Fig. 5e). It can be seen
that the distributions of optimized BC emissions at three vertical levels
are relatively consistent with those of prior emissions (Fig. 5b, d, f).
However, the optimized emissions are considerably reduced (Fig. 5b, d, f).
Especially for the regions where observation sites are located, such as
southern Beijing, Tianjin, central and southern Hebei, northwest Shandong,
central Shanxi, and northern Henan, BC emissions decrease significantly. As
for the regions where observation sites are not located, such as Liaoning
and Jiangsu, BC emissions are almost unchanged. The reason for this
phenomenon is discussed in Sect. 4.3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2954">Spatial distributions of the <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> prior and <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> optimized daily BC emissions. The emissions are at three vertical levels:
<bold>(a, b)</bold> non-point source on the ground, <bold>(c, d)</bold> middle-elevation point source
at 50 m and <bold>(e, f)</bold> high-elevation point source at 120 m, as required by the
GRAPES–CUACE model.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/337/2021/gmd-14-337-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2978">In order to analyse the differences between the prior and optimized BC
emissions in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei–Shanxi–Shandong–Henan region in more
depth and detail, we calculated the ratio of the optimized emissions to
prior emissions (optimized emissions divide by prior emissions), as shown
in Fig. 6. In general, assimilation has the largest reduction in the non-point
source on the ground (Fig. 6a), followed by the middle-elevation point source at
50 m (Fig. 6b), and the smallest reduction in the high-elevation point source at
120 m (Fig. 6c). This is related to the intensity of BC emissions at three
vertical levels. The intensity of BC emissions on the ground (Fig. 5a) is
about 1–2 orders of magnitude higher than that of the middle-elevation point
source at 50 m (Fig. 5c) and the high-elevation point source at 120 m (Fig. 5e). In
other words, the BC emissions on the ground have the most significant effect
on the overall cost function and therefore reduced most during the
progression of assimilation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2984">The ratio of optimized emissions to prior emissions (optimized
emissions divide by prior emissions). <bold>(a)</bold> Non-point source on the ground,
<bold>(b)</bold> middle-elevation point source at 50 m and <bold>(c)</bold> high-elevation point
source at 120 m.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/337/2021/gmd-14-337-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3002">The prior BC emissions used in this study are based on statistical data of
anthropogenic emissions for 2007 (Cao et al., 2011), and the BC observations
used for assimilation are from 2016, so the ratios of the optimized
emissions to prior emissions can reflect the changes in BC emissions from
2007 to 2016 to a certain extent. From the perspective of each province, we
can see that the ratios of the optimized emissions to prior emissions in
Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, Shandong and Henan are 0.4–0.8, 0.4–0.7,
0.4–0.8, 0.6–0.8, 0.4–0.8 and 0.5–0.8, respectively. This indicates that the
BC emissions in these highly industrialized regions have greatly reduced
from 2007 to 2016, which is consistent with previous studies (Zheng et al.,
2018). Table 1 lists the anthropogenic BC emissions in China by province in
2006 and 2016 and the emission ratios of 2016 relative to 2006. According to
previous research, the emission ratios of 2016 relative to 2006 are
0.41–0.82 in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei–Shanxi–Shandong–Henan region and 0.73
over China. It can be seen that the ratios of the optimized emissions to
prior emissions calculated in this study are within a reasonable range,
which also shows that the newly constructed GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation
system can obtain reasonable BC emissions based on the observations.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Table}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3008">Anthropogenic BC emissions in China by province in
2006<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2016<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (units:
Gg/year).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Province</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.70 (0.41)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tianjin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.81 (0.72)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hebei</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">137.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">97.99 (0.72)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shanxi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">139.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">69.26 (0.50)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shandong</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">132.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">108.82 (0.82)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Henan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">133.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">82.42 (0.62)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1811.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1315.28 (0.73)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3029">Note: numbers in parentheses represent emission ratios relative to 2006.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Source: Zhang et al. (2009).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Source: MEIC (Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China),
<uri>http://meicmodel.org/</uri> (last access: 14 January 2021).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3175">Although Sect. 4.1 shows that assimilation reduces the model biases and
improves all statistical values at each site, there are still
over-predictions to a certain degree. In addition to the emission, the
initial concentration is also an important factor that affects the BC
simulation. Here, we take Beijing as an example to analyse the influence of
the initial concentration on the BC simulation. Figure 7 shows the comparison
of observed and simulated (with the prior and optimized BC emissions,
respectively) BC concentrations in Beijing from 20:00, 3 July, to 19:00, 4 July 2016. At the initial moment (20:00, 3 July 2016), the
initial concentration for simulation (11.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was about 2 times higher than the observations (5.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). With such a high
initial concentration, the simulated BC concentrations with prior emissions
were significantly higher than the observed concentrations at all times. The
simulations with optimized emissions compensated for the over-predictions, but
the BC concentrations were still higher than the observations in the first
few hours (from 20:00, 3 July, to 02:00, 4 July  2016). And the
model bias during this time period was 5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As the
influence of the initial concentration on the simulation gradually weakened,
the simulated BC concentrations with optimized emissions were largely
reduced and much closer to the observations from 03:00 to 19:00, 4 July
2016, and the model biases during this time period also decreased,
with the value of 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This indicates that for short-term
simulation, the influence of initial concentration on the simulation is not
negligible. In further work, it is also of great significance to use
the GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system to optimize the initial
concentration to improve the simulation effect.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3257">Comparison of observed and simulated (with the prior and
optimized BC emissions, respectively) BC concentrations in Beijing from
20:00, 3 July, to 19:00, 4 July 2016. The observed BC
concentrations were calculated by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio method.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/14/337/2021/gmd-14-337-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3281">As described in Sect. 4.2, after assimilation, the BC emissions in the
regions where observation sites are located decrease significantly, while in
the regions where observation sites are not located, such as Liaoning and
Jiangsu, BC emissions are almost unchanged. This may be due to the short
period of the observation data used for assimilation. In this study, since
the GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system has not yet implemented parallel
computing, the assimilation window was set for 24 h. In such a short
period of time, the pollutants emitted from Liaoning and Jiangsu may not have been transported to the regions where observation sites are located,
thus having little impact on the BC concentrations in these regions. In
other words, the emissions from Liaoning and Jiangsu have little effect on
the overall cost function, so there is little change during the progression
of assimilation. Therefore, implementing parallel computing of the
GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system and performing emission inversion
for a longer period (i.e. 1 month) is another important task in the
future.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3294">In this study, we developed a new 4D-Var data assimilation system for the
GRAPES–CUACE atmospheric chemistry model (GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var) and applied
it for assimilating surface BC concentrations and optimizing its daily
emissions in northern China on 4 July 2016, when a pollution
event occurred in Beijing. The main conclusions are as follows.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3299">The newly constructed GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system is feasible
and can be applied to perform BC emission inversion in northern China.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3303">The BC concentrations simulated with optimized emissions show improved
agreement with the observations over northern China with lower
root-mean-square errors and higher correlation coefficients. The model
biases are reduced by 20 %–46 %. The validation of assimilation results with
observations that were not utilized in the assimilation shows that
assimilation compensates for over-predictions, reduces the root-mean-square
errors and improves the correlation coefficients. The improvements are also
notable, with values of the model biases reduced by 1 %–36 %.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3307">Compared with the prior BC emissions, the optimized emissions are
considerably reduced. Especially for Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shandong,
Shanxi and Henan, the ratios of the optimized emissions to prior emissions
are 0.4–0.8, indicating that the BC emissions in these highly industrialized
regions have greatly reduced from 2007 to 2016, which is consistent with
previous studies.</p></list-item></list>
In the following work, implementing parallel computing of the
GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system and performing emission inversion
for a longer period is an important task. Apart from the emissions, the
initial concentration is also an important factor for short-term simulation.
It is of great significance to use the GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation
system to optimize the initial concentration to improve the simulation
effect.</p>
      <p id="d1e3311">Meanwhile, several mega urban agglomerations in China are facing atmospheric
compound pollution with high PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Li et
al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Xiang et al., 2020; Haque et al., 2020; Zhao
et al., 2020). To improve air quality, it is urgent to formulate reasonable
and effective emission-reduction measures. Therefore, further studies on
expanding the function of the GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system and
taking into account factors such as air quality standards, the proportion of
emissions that can be reduced, the economic cost and residents' health
benefits of emission reduction are crucial for formulating optimized
pollution-control strategies for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in China.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3354">The GRAPES–CUACE atmospheric chemistry model
used in this study was distributed by the National Meteorological Center of the Chinese Meteorology Administration (2021, <uri>http://www.nmc.cn</uri>) together
with the Institute of Atmospheric Composition and Environmental Meteorology
of the Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (2021, <uri>http://www.camscma.cn</uri>).
The model was run on an IBM PureFlex System (AIX) with an XL Fortran
Compiler. The code of the GRAPES–CUACE aerosol adjoint model is available online
at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2153-2016-supplement" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-2153-2016-supplement</ext-link> (An et al., 2016). The code of GRAPES_CUACE_4D_Var_driver.F can be
downloaded as a Supplement to this article. The observations are available
online at <uri>http://www.mee.gov.cn/</uri> (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, 2021).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3369">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-337-2021-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-337-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3378">XA envisioned and oversaw the project. XA and
CW designed and developed the GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system and
prepared the paper. CW designed the experiments and carried out the
simulations with contributions from all other co-authors. QH and ZS provided
the observation data used in the study. YL and JL processed the data and
prepared the data visualization. All authors reviewed the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3384">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3390">We thank  Lin
Zhang from the Numerical Forecast Center of the China Meteorological
Administration for providing technical support with the optimization algorithm.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3395">This research has been supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2017YFC0210006) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41975173 and 91644223).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3401">This paper was edited by Augustin Colette and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>An, X. Q., Zhai, S. X., Jin, M., Gong, S., and Wang, Y.: Development of an adjoint model of GRAPES–CUACE and its application in tracking influential haze source areas in north China, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2153–2165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2153-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-2153-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andre, J. C., Demoor, G., Lacarrere, P., Therry, G., and Duvachat, R.:
Modeling the 24-hour evolution of the mean and turbulent structures of the
planetary boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1861–1883, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035&lt;1861:Mtheot&gt;2.0.Co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035&lt;1861:Mtheot&gt;2.0.Co;2</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Betts, A. K. and Miller, M. J.: A new convective adjustment scheme Part II:
Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, and arctic air-mass data sets,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 693–709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711247308" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49711247308</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J., and Zhu, C.: A limited memory algorithm for
bound constrained optimization, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 16,
1190–1208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1137/0916069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1137/0916069</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cao, G. L., Zhang, X. Y., Gong, S. L., An, X. Q., and Wang, Y. Q.: Emission
inventories of primary particles and pollutant gases for China, Chinese Sci.
Bull., 56, 781–788, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4373-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11434-011-4373-7</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cao, H., Fu, T.-M., Zhang, L., Henze, D. K., Miller, C. C., Lerot, C., Abad, G. G., De Smedt, I., Zhang, Q., van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Chance, K., Li, J., Zheng, J., and Zhao, Y.: Adjoint inversion of Chinese non-methane volatile organic compound emissions using space-based observations of formaldehyde and glyoxal, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15017–15046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15017-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-15017-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Charney, J. G. and Phillips, N. A.: Numerical integration of the quasi-geostrophic equations for barotropic and simple baroclinic flows, J. Meteorol., 10, 71–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010&lt;0071:NIOTQG&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010&lt;0071:NIOTQG&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1953.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, D., Xue, J., Yang, X., Zhang, H., Shen, X., Hu, J., Wang, Y., Ji, L.,
and Chen, J.: New generation of multi-scale NWP system (GRAPES): general
scientific design, Chinese Sci. Bull., 53, 3433–3445, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0494-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11434-008-0494-z</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, F., Mitchell, K., Schaake, J., Xue, Y. K., Pan, H. L., Koren, V.,
Duan, Q. Y., Ek, M., and Betts, A.: Modeling of land surface evaporation by
four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 101, 7251–7268, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02165" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95jd02165</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dudhia, J.: Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a meso- scale two-dimensional model, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077–3107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046&lt;3077:NSOCOD&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046&lt;3077:NSOCOD&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Elbern, H. and Schmidt, H.: A four-dimensional variational chemistry data
assimilation scheme for Eulerian chemistry transport modeling, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 104, 18583–18598, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900280</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Elbern, H. and Schmidt, H.: Ozone episode analysis by four- dimensional
variational chemistrydata assimilation. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
3569–3590, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Elbern, H., Schmidt, H., Talagrand, O., and Ebel, A.: 4D-variational data
assimilation with an adjoint air qualitymodel for emission analysis,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 15, 539–548,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00049-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00049-9</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Elbern, H., Strunk, A., Schmidt, H., and Talagrand, O.: Emission rate and chemical state estimation by 4-dimensional variational inversion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3749–3769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3749-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3749-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gong, S. L. and Zhang, X. Y.: CUACE/Dust – an integrated system of observation and modeling systems for operational dust forecasting in Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2333–2340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2333-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2333-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gong, S. L., Barrie, L. A., Blanchet, J.-P., Salzen, K. V., Lohmann, U.,
Lesins, G., Spacek, L., Zhang, L. M., Girard, E., and Lin, H.: Canadian
Aerosol Module: A size-segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol
processes for climate and air quality models, 1, Module development, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD002002</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gong, T., Sun, Z., Zhang X., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Han, L., Zhao, D., Ding,
D., and Zheng, C.: Associations of black carbon and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with daily
cardiovascular mortality in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ.,  214, 116876, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116876" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116876</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hakami, A., Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Chai, T., Tang, Y., Carmichael,
G. R., and Sandu, A.: Adjoint inverse modeling of black carbon during the
Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, D14301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005671" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005671</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hakami, A., Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Singh, K., Sandu, A., Kim, S.,
Byun, D., and Li, Q.: The adjoint of CMAQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
7807–7817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070944p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es070944p</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hansen, P. C.: Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems: numerical aspects of linear inversion, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, USA, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haque, M. M., Fang, C., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Abbaszade, G., Liu, X. Y., Bao,
M. Y., Zhang, W. Q., and Zhang, Y. L.: Regional haze formation enhanced the
atmospheric pollution levels in the Yangtze River Delta region, China:
Implications for anthropogenic sources and secondary aerosol formation.
Sci. Total Environ., 728, 138013,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138013</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Henze, D. K., Hakami, A., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2413–2433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2413-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-2413-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., and Shindell, D. T.: Inverse modeling and mapping US air quality influences of inorganic PM2.5 precursor emissions using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5877–5903, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5877-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5877-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hong, S. and Lim, J. J.: The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme
(WSM6), Asia-pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hong, S. Y. and Pan, H. L.: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2322–2339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124&lt;2322:NBLVDI&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124&lt;2322:NBLVDI&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, S. X., Liu, F., Sheng, L., Cheng, L. J., Wu, L., and Li, J.: On adjoint
method based atmospheric emission source tracing, Chinese Sci. Bull., 63,
1594–1605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1360/N972018-00196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1360/N972018-00196</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Janjić, Z. I.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further
developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure
schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 927–945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122&lt;0927:TSMECM&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122&lt;0927:TSMECM&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jeong, J. I. and Park R J.: Efficacy of dust aerosol forecasts for East Asia
using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem with ground-based observations, Environ.
Pollut., 234, 885–893, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.025</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, Z., Jones, D. B. A., Worden, H. M., and Henze, D. K.: Sensitivity of top-down CO source estimates to the modeled vertical structure in atmospheric CO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1521–1537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1521-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1521-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ke, H.: Construction and application of a real-time emission model of
open biomass burning, Master dissertation, Chinese Academy of Meteorological
Sciences, Beijing, 1–57, 2019 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kurokawa, J. I., Yumimoto, K., Uno, I., and Ohara, T.: Adjoint inverse
modeling of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over eastern China using satellite observations of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column densities, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1878–1887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.030</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Shen, L., Zhang, Q., and Bates, K. H.:
Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 422–427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1812168116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D. C. and Nocedal, J.: On the limited memory BFGS method for large
scale optimization, Math. Program., 45, 503–528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF01589116</ext-link>,
1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, F.: Adjoint model of Comprehensive Air quality Model CAMx –
construction and application, Post-doctoral research report, Peking
University, Beijing, 1–101, 2005 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mao, Y. H., Li, Q. B., Henze, D. K., Jiang, Z., Jones, D. B. A., Kopacz, M., He, C., Qi, L., Gao, M., Hao, W.-M., and Liou, K.-N.: Estimates of black carbon emissions in the western United States using the GEOS-Chem adjoint model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7685–7702, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7685-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7685-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China: Air Quality, available at: <uri>http://www.mee.gov.cn/</uri>, last access: 15 January 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S. A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated‐k model for the longwave, J.  Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 16663–16682, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00237</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface
layer of the atmosphere, Contrib. Geophys. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR, 151,
163–187, 1954 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Müller, J.-F. and Stavrakou, T.: Inversion of CO and NOx emissions using the adjoint of the IMAGES model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1157–1186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1157-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1157-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009604003981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1009604003981</ext-link>, 1998a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pilinis, C., and Pandis, S.: Continued development and testing of
a new thermodynamics aerosol module for urban and regional air quality
models, Atmos. Environ., 33,
1553–1560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00352-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00352-5</ext-link>, 1998b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, S. Y., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. H., and Lee, H. W.: Variational data assimilation for the optimized ozone initial state and the short-time forecasting, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3631–3649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3631-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3631-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Resler, J., Eben, K., Jurus, P., and Liczki, J.: Inverse modeling of
emissions and their time profiles, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 1, 288–295,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5094/apr.2010.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5094/apr.2010.036</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding–Theory and practice, Ser. on Atmos. Oceanic and Planet. Phys., Vol. 2,  Singapore,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812813718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/9789812813718</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sandu, A., Daescu, D. N., Carmichael, G. R., and Chai, T.: Adjoint
sensitivity analysis of regional air quality models, J. Comput. Phys., 204,
222–252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.011</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stockwell, W. R., Middleton, P., Change, J. S., and Tang, X.: The second
generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional
air quality modeling, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 16343–16376,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD10p16343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD095iD10p16343</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>The Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences: Scientific research, available at: <uri>http://www.camscma.cn/</uri>, last access: 15 January 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>The National Meteorological Center: Numerical forecast, available at: <uri>http://www.nmc.cn/</uri>, last access: 15 January 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, C., An, X., Zhai, S., and Sun, Z.: Tracking a severe pollution event
in Beijing in December 2016 with the GRAPES-CUACE adjoint model, J.
Meteorol. Res., 32, 49–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7062-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13351-018-7062-5</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, C., An, X., Zhai, S., Hou, Q., and Sun, Z.: Tracking sensitive source
areas of different weather pollution types using GRAPES-CUACE adjoint model,
Atmos. Environ., 175, 154–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.041</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, C., An, X., Zhang, P., Sun, Z., Cui, M., and Ma, L.: Comparing the
impact of strong and weak East Asian winter monsoon on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
in Beijing, Atmos. Res., 215, 165–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.022</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Gong, S. L., Zhang, H. L., Chen, Y., Shen, X., Chen, D., Xue, J.,
Shen, Y., Wu, X., and Jin, Z.: A new-generation sand and dust storm
forecasting system GRAPES_CUACE/Dust: Model development,
verification and numerical simulation, Chinese Sci. Bull., 55, 635–649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0481-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11434-009-0481-z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Xue, M., Zhang, X. Y., Liu, H. L., Zhou, C. H., Tan, S. C., Che, H. Z., Chen, B., and Li, T.: Mesoscale modeling study of the interactions between aerosols and PBL meteorology during a haze episode in Jing–Jin–Ji (China) and its nearby surrounding region – Part 1: Aerosol distributions and meteorological features, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3257–3275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3257-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3257-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Xu, X., Henze, D. K., Zeng, J., Ji, Q., Tsay, S. C., and Huang, J.:
Top-down estimate of dust emissions through integration of MODIS and MISR
aerosol retrievals with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, L08802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL051136</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>West, J. J., Pilinis, C., Nenes, A., and Pandis, S. N.: Marginal direct
climate forcing by atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Environ. 32, 2531–2542,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(98)00003-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(98)00003-x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xiang, S. L., Liu, J. F., Tao, W., Yi, K., Xu, J. Y. , Hu, X. R., Liu, H.
Z., Wang, Y. Q., Zhang, Y. Z., Yang, H. Z., Hu, J. Y., Wan, Y., Wang, X. J.,
Ma, J. M., Wang, X. L., and Tao, S.: Control of both PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the surrounding areas, Atmos. Environ., 224,  117259,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117250" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117250</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, G., Chen, D., Xue, J., Sun, J., Shen, X., Shen, Y., Huang, L., Wu, X.,
Zhang, H., and Wang, S.: The program structure de- signing and optimizing
tests of GRAPES physics, Chinese Sci. Bull., 53, 3470–3476,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0418-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11434-008-0418-y</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ye, Q. and Shen, Y.: Practical Mathematical Manual, Science Press, Beijing,
2006 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yumimoto, K. and Uno, I.: Adjoint inverse modeling of CO emissions over
Eastern Asia using four-dimensional variational data assimilation, Atmos.
Environ., 40, 6836–6845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.042</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhai, S., An, X., Liu, Z., Sun, Z., and Hou, Q.: Model assessment of atmospheric pollution control schemes for critical emission regions, Atmos. Environ., 124, 367–377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.093</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhai, S., An, X., Zhao, T., Sun, Z., Wang, W., Hou, Q., Guo, Z., and Wang, C.: Detection of critical PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission sources and their contributions to a heavy haze episode in Beijing, China, using an adjoint model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6241–6258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6241-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-6241-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Shao, J., Lu, X., Zhao, Y., Hu, Y., Henze, D. K., Liao, H., Gong,
S., and Zhang, Q.: Sources and processes affecting fine particulate matter
pollution over North China: an adjoint analysis of the Beijing APEC period,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 8731–8740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03010</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., He, K. B., Huo, H., Kannari, A., Klimont, Z., Park, I. S., Reddy, S., Fu, J. S., Chen, D., Duan, L., Lei, Y., Wang, L. T., and Yao, Z. L.: Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5131–5153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009</ext-link>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, R. and Shen, X.: On the development of the GRAPES – a new generation
of the national operational NWP system in China, Chinese Sci. Bull., 53,
3429–3432, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0462-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11434-008-0462-7</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Xu, X., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, Y.m and Zhong, J.: The
impact of meteorological changes from 2013 to 2017 on PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass reduction
in key regions in China, Sci. China Earth Sci., 49, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9343-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-019-9343-3</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Z. J., Liu, R., and Zhang, Z. Y.: Characteristics of Winter Haze
Pollution in the Fenwei Plain and the Possible Influence of EU During
1984–2017, Earth Space Sci., 7,  e2020EA001134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ea001134" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020ea001134</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, C. H., Gong, S. L., Zhang, X. Y., Wang, Y. Q., Niu, T., Liu, H. L., Zhao, T. L., Yang, Y. Q., and Hou, Q.: Development and evaluation of an operational SDS forecasting system for East Asia: CUACE/Dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 787–798, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-787-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-787-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, C. H., Gong, S. L., Zhang, X. Y., Liu, H. L., Xue, M., Cao, G. L., An,
X. Q., Che, H. Z., Zhang, Y. M., and Niu, T.: Towards the improvements of
simulating the chemical and optical properties of Chinese aerosols using an
online coupled model – CUACE/Aero, Tellus B, 64, 18965,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.18965" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.18965</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, C., Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., and Nocedal, J.: Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B:
Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization, ACM T.
Math. Softw., 23, 550–560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1145/279232.279236" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1145/279232.279236</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Development of four-dimensional variational assimilation system based on the GRAPES–CUACE adjoint model (GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var V1.0) and its application in emission inversion</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>In this study, a four-dimensional variational (4D-Var) data
assimilation system was developed based on the GRAPES–CUACE (Global/Regional
Assimilation and PrEdiction System – CMA Unified Atmospheric
Chemistry Environmental Forecasting System) atmospheric
chemistry model, GRAPES–CUACE adjoint model and L-BFGS-B (extended limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno) algorithm
(GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var) and was applied to optimize black carbon (BC) daily
emissions in northern China on 4 July 2016, when a pollution event
occurred in Beijing. The results show that the newly constructed
GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var assimilation system is feasible and can be applied to
perform BC emission inversion in northern China. The BC concentrations
simulated with optimized emissions show improved agreement with the
observations over northern China with lower root-mean-square errors and
higher correlation coefficients. The model biases are reduced by 20&thinsp;%–46&thinsp;%.
The validation with observations that were not utilized in the assimilation
shows that assimilation makes notable improvements, with values of the model
biases reduced by 1&thinsp;%–36&thinsp;%. Compared with the prior BC emissions, which are
based on statistical data of anthropogenic emissions for 2007, the optimized
emissions are considerably reduced. Especially for Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei,
Shandong, Shanxi and Henan, the ratios of the optimized emissions to prior
emissions are 0.4–0.8, indicating that the BC emissions in these highly
industrialized regions have greatly reduced from 2007 to 2016. In the
future, further studies on improving the performance of the GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var
assimilation system are still needed and are important for air pollution
research in China.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
An, X. Q., Zhai, S. X., Jin, M., Gong, S., and Wang, Y.: Development of an adjoint model of GRAPES–CUACE and its application in tracking influential haze source areas in north China, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2153–2165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2153-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2153-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Andre, J. C., Demoor, G., Lacarrere, P., Therry, G., and Duvachat, R.:
Modeling the 24-hour evolution of the mean and turbulent structures of the
planetary boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1861–1883, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035&lt;1861:Mtheot&gt;2.0.Co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035&lt;1861:Mtheot&gt;2.0.Co;2</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Betts, A. K. and Miller, M. J.: A new convective adjustment scheme Part II:
Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, and arctic air-mass data sets,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 693–709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711247308" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711247308</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J., and Zhu, C.: A limited memory algorithm for
bound constrained optimization, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 16,
1190–1208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1137/0916069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1137/0916069</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cao, G. L., Zhang, X. Y., Gong, S. L., An, X. Q., and Wang, Y. Q.: Emission
inventories of primary particles and pollutant gases for China, Chinese Sci.
Bull., 56, 781–788, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4373-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4373-7</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, H., Fu, T.-M., Zhang, L., Henze, D. K., Miller, C. C., Lerot, C., Abad, G. G., De Smedt, I., Zhang, Q., van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Chance, K., Li, J., Zheng, J., and Zhao, Y.: Adjoint inversion of Chinese non-methane volatile organic compound emissions using space-based observations of formaldehyde and glyoxal, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15017–15046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15017-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15017-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Charney, J. G. and Phillips, N. A.: Numerical integration of the quasi-geostrophic equations for barotropic and simple baroclinic flows, J. Meteorol., 10, 71–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010&lt;0071:NIOTQG&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010&lt;0071:NIOTQG&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1953.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chen, D., Xue, J., Yang, X., Zhang, H., Shen, X., Hu, J., Wang, Y., Ji, L.,
and Chen, J.: New generation of multi-scale NWP system (GRAPES): general
scientific design, Chinese Sci. Bull., 53, 3433–3445, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0494-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0494-z</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, F., Mitchell, K., Schaake, J., Xue, Y. K., Pan, H. L., Koren, V.,
Duan, Q. Y., Ek, M., and Betts, A.: Modeling of land surface evaporation by
four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 101, 7251–7268, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02165" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02165</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dudhia, J.: Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a meso- scale two-dimensional model, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077–3107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046&lt;3077:NSOCOD&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046&lt;3077:NSOCOD&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Elbern, H. and Schmidt, H.: A four-dimensional variational chemistry data
assimilation scheme for Eulerian chemistry transport modeling, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 104, 18583–18598, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900280" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900280</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Elbern, H. and Schmidt, H.: Ozone episode analysis by four- dimensional
variational chemistrydata assimilation. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
3569–3590, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Elbern, H., Schmidt, H., Talagrand, O., and Ebel, A.: 4D-variational data
assimilation with an adjoint air qualitymodel for emission analysis,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 15, 539–548,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00049-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00049-9</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Elbern, H., Strunk, A., Schmidt, H., and Talagrand, O.: Emission rate and chemical state estimation by 4-dimensional variational inversion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3749–3769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3749-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3749-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Gong, S. L. and Zhang, X. Y.: CUACE/Dust – an integrated system of observation and modeling systems for operational dust forecasting in Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2333–2340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2333-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2333-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gong, S. L., Barrie, L. A., Blanchet, J.-P., Salzen, K. V., Lohmann, U.,
Lesins, G., Spacek, L., Zhang, L. M., Girard, E., and Lin, H.: Canadian
Aerosol Module: A size-segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol
processes for climate and air quality models, 1, Module development, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002002</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gong, T., Sun, Z., Zhang X., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Han, L., Zhao, D., Ding,
D., and Zheng, C.: Associations of black carbon and PM<sub>2.5</sub> with daily
cardiovascular mortality in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ.,  214, 116876, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116876" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116876</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Hakami, A., Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Chai, T., Tang, Y., Carmichael,
G. R., and Sandu, A.: Adjoint inverse modeling of black carbon during the
Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, D14301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005671" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005671</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hakami, A., Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Singh, K., Sandu, A., Kim, S.,
Byun, D., and Li, Q.: The adjoint of CMAQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
7807–7817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070944p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es070944p</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, P. C.: Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems: numerical aspects of linear inversion, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, USA, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Haque, M. M., Fang, C., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Abbaszade, G., Liu, X. Y., Bao,
M. Y., Zhang, W. Q., and Zhang, Y. L.: Regional haze formation enhanced the
atmospheric pollution levels in the Yangtze River Delta region, China:
Implications for anthropogenic sources and secondary aerosol formation.
Sci. Total Environ., 728, 138013,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138013</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Henze, D. K., Hakami, A., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2413–2433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2413-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2413-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., and Shindell, D. T.: Inverse modeling and mapping US air quality influences of inorganic PM2.5 precursor emissions using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5877–5903, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5877-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5877-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Hong, S. and Lim, J. J.: The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme
(WSM6), Asia-pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, S. Y. and Pan, H. L.: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2322–2339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124&lt;2322:NBLVDI&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124&lt;2322:NBLVDI&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Huang, S. X., Liu, F., Sheng, L., Cheng, L. J., Wu, L., and Li, J.: On adjoint
method based atmospheric emission source tracing, Chinese Sci. Bull., 63,
1594–1605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1360/N972018-00196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1360/N972018-00196</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Janjić, Z. I.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further
developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure
schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 927–945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122&lt;0927:TSMECM&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122&lt;0927:TSMECM&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Jeong, J. I. and Park R J.: Efficacy of dust aerosol forecasts for East Asia
using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem with ground-based observations, Environ.
Pollut., 234, 885–893, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.025</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, Z., Jones, D. B. A., Worden, H. M., and Henze, D. K.: Sensitivity of top-down CO source estimates to the modeled vertical structure in atmospheric CO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1521–1537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1521-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1521-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Ke, H.: Construction and application of a real-time emission model of
open biomass burning, Master dissertation, Chinese Academy of Meteorological
Sciences, Beijing, 1–57, 2019 (in Chinese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kurokawa, J. I., Yumimoto, K., Uno, I., and Ohara, T.: Adjoint inverse
modeling of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions over eastern China using satellite observations of
NO<sub>2</sub> vertical column densities, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1878–1887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.030</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Shen, L., Zhang, Q., and Bates, K. H.:
Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 422–427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Liu, D. C. and Nocedal, J.: On the limited memory BFGS method for large
scale optimization, Math. Program., 45, 503–528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589116</a>,
1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Liu, F.: Adjoint model of Comprehensive Air quality Model CAMx –
construction and application, Post-doctoral research report, Peking
University, Beijing, 1–101, 2005 (in Chinese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation> Mao, Y. H., Li, Q. B., Henze, D. K., Jiang, Z., Jones, D. B. A., Kopacz, M., He, C., Qi, L., Gao, M., Hao, W.-M., and Liou, K.-N.: Estimates of black carbon emissions in the western United States using the GEOS-Chem adjoint model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7685–7702, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7685-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7685-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China: Air Quality, available at: <a href="http://www.mee.gov.cn/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 15 January 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S. A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated‐k model for the longwave, J.  Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 16663–16682, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface
layer of the atmosphere, Contrib. Geophys. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR, 151,
163–187, 1954 (in Russian).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation> Müller, J.-F. and Stavrakou, T.: Inversion of CO and NOx emissions using the adjoint of the IMAGES model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1157–1186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1157-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1157-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic
equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem., 4, 123–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009604003981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009604003981</a>, 1998a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pilinis, C., and Pandis, S.: Continued development and testing of
a new thermodynamics aerosol module for urban and regional air quality
models, Atmos. Environ., 33,
1553–1560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00352-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00352-5</a>, 1998b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S. Y., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. H., and Lee, H. W.: Variational data assimilation for the optimized ozone initial state and the short-time forecasting, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3631–3649, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3631-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3631-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Resler, J., Eben, K., Jurus, P., and Liczki, J.: Inverse modeling of
emissions and their time profiles, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 1, 288–295,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5094/apr.2010.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5094/apr.2010.036</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding–Theory and practice, Ser. on Atmos. Oceanic and Planet. Phys., Vol. 2,  Singapore,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812813718" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812813718</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Sandu, A., Daescu, D. N., Carmichael, G. R., and Chai, T.: Adjoint
sensitivity analysis of regional air quality models, J. Comput. Phys., 204,
222–252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.011</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Stockwell, W. R., Middleton, P., Change, J. S., and Tang, X.: The second
generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional
air quality modeling, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 16343–16376,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD10p16343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD10p16343</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
The Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences: Scientific research, available at: <a href="http://www.camscma.cn/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 15 January 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
The National Meteorological Center: Numerical forecast, available at: <a href="http://www.nmc.cn/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 15 January 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Wang, C., An, X., Zhai, S., and Sun, Z.: Tracking a severe pollution event
in Beijing in December 2016 with the GRAPES-CUACE adjoint model, J.
Meteorol. Res., 32, 49–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7062-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7062-5</a>, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wang, C., An, X., Zhai, S., Hou, Q., and Sun, Z.: Tracking sensitive source
areas of different weather pollution types using GRAPES-CUACE adjoint model,
Atmos. Environ., 175, 154–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.041</a>, 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Wang, C., An, X., Zhang, P., Sun, Z., Cui, M., and Ma, L.: Comparing the
impact of strong and weak East Asian winter monsoon on PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration
in Beijing, Atmos. Res., 215, 165–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.022</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Gong, S. L., Zhang, H. L., Chen, Y., Shen, X., Chen, D., Xue, J.,
Shen, Y., Wu, X., and Jin, Z.: A new-generation sand and dust storm
forecasting system GRAPES_CUACE/Dust: Model development,
verification and numerical simulation, Chinese Sci. Bull., 55, 635–649, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0481-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0481-z</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Xue, M., Zhang, X. Y., Liu, H. L., Zhou, C. H., Tan, S. C., Che, H. Z., Chen, B., and Li, T.: Mesoscale modeling study of the interactions between aerosols and PBL meteorology during a haze episode in Jing–Jin–Ji (China) and its nearby surrounding region – Part 1: Aerosol distributions and meteorological features, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3257–3275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3257-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3257-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Xu, X., Henze, D. K., Zeng, J., Ji, Q., Tsay, S. C., and Huang, J.:
Top-down estimate of dust emissions through integration of MODIS and MISR
aerosol retrievals with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, L08802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051136</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>West, J. J., Pilinis, C., Nenes, A., and Pandis, S. N.: Marginal direct
climate forcing by atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Environ. 32, 2531–2542,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(98)00003-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(98)00003-x</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Xiang, S. L., Liu, J. F., Tao, W., Yi, K., Xu, J. Y. , Hu, X. R., Liu, H.
Z., Wang, Y. Q., Zhang, Y. Z., Yang, H. Z., Hu, J. Y., Wan, Y., Wang, X. J.,
Ma, J. M., Wang, X. L., and Tao, S.: Control of both PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> in
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the surrounding areas, Atmos. Environ., 224,  117259,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117250" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117250</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Xu, G., Chen, D., Xue, J., Sun, J., Shen, X., Shen, Y., Huang, L., Wu, X.,
Zhang, H., and Wang, S.: The program structure de- signing and optimizing
tests of GRAPES physics, Chinese Sci. Bull., 53, 3470–3476,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0418-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0418-y</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Ye, Q. and Shen, Y.: Practical Mathematical Manual, Science Press, Beijing,
2006 (in Chinese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Yumimoto, K. and Uno, I.: Adjoint inverse modeling of CO emissions over
Eastern Asia using four-dimensional variational data assimilation, Atmos.
Environ., 40, 6836–6845, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.042</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zhai, S., An, X., Liu, Z., Sun, Z., and Hou, Q.: Model assessment of atmospheric pollution control schemes for critical emission regions, Atmos. Environ., 124, 367–377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.093</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Zhai, S., An, X., Zhao, T., Sun, Z., Wang, W., Hou, Q., Guo, Z., and Wang, C.: Detection of critical PM<sub>2.5</sub> emission sources and their contributions to a heavy haze episode in Beijing, China, using an adjoint model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6241–6258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6241-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6241-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Shao, J., Lu, X., Zhao, Y., Hu, Y., Henze, D. K., Liao, H., Gong,
S., and Zhang, Q.: Sources and processes affecting fine particulate matter
pollution over North China: an adjoint analysis of the Beijing APEC period,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 8731–8740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03010</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., He, K. B., Huo, H., Kannari, A., Klimont, Z., Park, I. S., Reddy, S., Fu, J. S., Chen, D., Duan, L., Lei, Y., Wang, L. T., and Yao, Z. L.: Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5131–5153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5131-2009</a>, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R. and Shen, X.: On the development of the GRAPES – a new generation
of the national operational NWP system in China, Chinese Sci. Bull., 53,
3429–3432, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0462-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0462-7</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Xu, X., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, Y.m and Zhong, J.: The
impact of meteorological changes from 2013 to 2017 on PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass reduction
in key regions in China, Sci. China Earth Sci., 49, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9343-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9343-3</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Z. J., Liu, R., and Zhang, Z. Y.: Characteristics of Winter Haze
Pollution in the Fenwei Plain and the Possible Influence of EU During
1984–2017, Earth Space Sci., 7,  e2020EA001134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ea001134" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ea001134</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, C. H., Gong, S. L., Zhang, X. Y., Wang, Y. Q., Niu, T., Liu, H. L., Zhao, T. L., Yang, Y. Q., and Hou, Q.: Development and evaluation of an operational SDS forecasting system for East Asia: CUACE/Dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 787–798, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-787-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-787-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, C. H., Gong, S. L., Zhang, X. Y., Liu, H. L., Xue, M., Cao, G. L., An,
X. Q., Che, H. Z., Zhang, Y. M., and Niu, T.: Towards the improvements of
simulating the chemical and optical properties of Chinese aerosols using an
online coupled model – CUACE/Aero, Tellus B, 64, 18965,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.18965" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.18965</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, C., Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., and Nocedal, J.: Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B:
Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization, ACM T.
Math. Softw., 23, 550–560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/279232.279236" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1145/279232.279236</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
