<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-13-783-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Jena Soil Model (JSM v1.0; revision 1934): a microbial soil organic carbon model integrated with nitrogen and phosphorus processes</article-title><alt-title>JSM</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{JSM}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L.~Yu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name>
          <email>lyu@bgc-jena.mpg.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-6749</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ahrens</surname><given-names>Bernhard</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wutzler</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-5445</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Schrumpf</surname><given-names>Marion</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zaehle</surname><given-names>Sönke</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5602-7956</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll Str. 10, 07745 Jena, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Jena, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Lin Yu (lyu@bgc-jena.mpg.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>783</fpage><lpage>803</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>July</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Lin Yu et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e123">Plant–soil interactions, such as the coupling of plants' below-ground biomass allocation with soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition, nutrient release and plant uptake, are essential to understand the response of carbon (C) cycling to global changes. However, these processes are poorly represented in the current terrestrial biosphere models owing to the simple first-order approach of SOM cycling and the ignorance of variations within a soil profile. While the emerging microbially explicit soil organic C models can better describe C formation and turnover, at present, they lack a full coupling to the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles with the soil profile. Here we present a new SOM model – the Jena Soil Model (JSM) – which is microbially explicit, vertically resolved and integrated with the N and P cycles. To account for the effects of nutrient availability and litter quality on decomposition, JSM includes the representation of enzyme allocation to different depolymerisation sources based on the microbial adaptation approach as well as of nutrient acquisition competition based on the equilibrium chemistry approximation approach. Herein, we present the model structure and basic features of model performance in a beech forest in Germany. The model reproduced the main SOM stocks and microbial biomass as well as their vertical patterns in the soil profile. We further tested the sensitivity of the model to parameterisation and showed that JSM is generally sensitive to changes in microbial stoichiometry and processes.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e137">There is ample evidence from both ecosystem monitoring data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.1"/> and ecosystem manipulation experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.2"/> that the effects of environmental changes, such as atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, global warming and continued air pollution, on terrestrial ecosystems are driven by the constraints imposed by macronutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). It is, therefore, of great relevance to identify and understand these constraints on global carbon (C) cycling and storage for predicting potential future carbon–climate feedback <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.3"/>. There have been continuous efforts to integrate the N <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.4"/> and P cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.5"/> in terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) for improving the representation of C–nutrient interactions. However, despite major advances in simulating terrestrial biogeochemistry, these nutrient-enabled TBMs largely fail to reproduce the responses of ecosystems to elevated atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, as observed in the free-air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.6"/>. An important shortcoming of the current generation of models is their poor representation of plant–soil interactions, in particular the responses of soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition and nutrient release to altered plant inputs and ultimately plant uptake of mineral nutrients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page784?><p id="d1e195"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Current TBMs largely adopt the CENTURY model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.8"/> or comparable model approaches, in which SOM is divided into two or three pools with different first-order decomposition rates. In these models, nutrient mineralisation and immobilisation fluxes depend on the C transfer efficiency between SOM pools and their prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stoichiometry. Recent insights in soil science have questioned the adequacy of the CENTURY approach to SOM cycling for simulating the effects of global changes, particularly in response to altered plant inputs. Researchers have underscored the need and offered a direction for a more mechanistic representation of soil processes in models, such as the substrate limitation of soil microbial growth as well as the nutrient immobilisation and physico-chemical stabilisation of organic matter through organo-mineral association <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.9"/>. Another limitation of many current SOM models in TBMs is that they represent soil as a ‘`bucket'’, thus ignoring the strong variance of SOM cycling within a soil profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.10"/>. Such a highly empirical representation of SOM cycling, in which important processes such as microbial immobilisation or rhizosphere deposition are not well represented, brings large uncertainties in future projections of terrestrial C sequestration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.11"/>. There have been increasing efforts in  taking into account microbial (enzymatic) dynamics and mineral association in soil organic C (SOC) models, such as CORPSE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.12"/>, MIMICS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.13"/>, MEND <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.14"/> and RESOM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.15"/>. Inclusion of these processes in SOC models has demonstrated possibilities to represent SOC responses to global warming <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.16"/>. Moreover, further inclusion of the explicit vertical resolution of biogeochemical processes and transport allows for the reconciliation of the SOC depth and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.17"/>. Although these new microbial SOC models better describe C formation and turnover processes than the conventional models, they still lack full coupling with the N and P cycles.</p>
      <p id="d1e259">The main challenge in coupling C and nutrient cycles in microbially explicit models is to account for the large stoichiometric imbalances between the microbial decomposers (i.e. soil microorganisms) and their resources (i.e. plant litter and SOM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.18"/>. Soil microbial communities can adapt to these imbalances by adjusting their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, typically through shifting community structure (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fungal</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bacterial</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.19"/> or through eliminating excess elements by altering their use efficiencies (e.g. C use efficiency) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.20"/>. A well-known adaptive mechanism to these imbalances is the exudation of extracellular enzymes to release nutrients through hydrolysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.21"/> or enhanced SOM oxidation, known as the “rhizosphere priming effect” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.22"/>. Recent evidence has also shown that soil P availability regulates phosphatase synthesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.23"/> and influences SOM turnover <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.24"/>. As the above-mentioned processes/phenomena are receiving more attentions, an increasing number of emerging microbially explicit models have started to tackle these challenges by accounting for the N cycle, enzymatic biosynthesis and rhizosphere priming <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.25"/> using certain novel approaches. For instance, the microbial adaptation concept has been applied to represent the adaptation of enzyme allocation by microorganisms to maximise their growth through altering the preferential source of decomposition between plant litter and SOM, as demonstrated using the SEAM model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.26"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e319">Theoretical representation of Jena Soil Model (JSM) structure. The vertical soil profile (9.5 m) is split into 15 soil layers; above-ground litter is added on top of the soil profile; root litter enters into each soil layer according to the root distribution. Bioturbation and DOM transport translocate SOM between soil layers. In each soil layer, boxes refer to pools and lines refer to processes. Red lines: biogeochemical fluxes of C, N and P; green lines: respiration fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for heterotrophic respiration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for microbial growth respiration); blue lines: fluxes of N and P; orange lines: fluxes of only P; dashed lines: biogeochemical processes that involves stoichiometry change between the sourcing and sinking pools. The number 1 at the centre (1) indicates microbial nutrient recycling from residue to DOM during decay; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: mineral-associated form (adsorbed to soil mineral surface or absorbed into soil mineral matrix) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be DOM, microbial residues or inorganic phosphate (Pi).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e372">Another emerging challenge of representing nutrient processes in microbially explicit models is the competition for nutrient uptake between plants and microbes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.27"/>. Regarding P, in particular, the soil mineral surface adsorbs inorganic P to compete with plants and microbes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.28"/>. The equilibrium chemistry approximation (ECA) approach has been proposed to simulate the competition of substrate uptake kinetics in complex networks where the uptake kinetics of one substrate affect the others <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.29"/>. ECA has also been applied to resolve mineral nutrient sink (plant–microbe uptake or mineral adsorption) competitions in other modelling studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.30"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e387">In this study, we present the structure and basic features of a novel microbially explicit and vertically resolved SOM model that integrates with the N and P cycles – the Jena Soil Model (JSM). JSM combines the representations of the vertical structure, microbially explicit decomposition and stabilisation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.31"/> with the microbial adaptation concept from the SEAM model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.32"/> and the ECA approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.33"/>. We tested alternative hypotheses regarding the competition among microbial, plant and mineral nutrient sinks (uptake or mineral sorption) and evaluated the effects of nutrient availability on the preferential decomposition of either nutrient-poor or nutrient-rich organic matter using observed soil C, N and P profiles in a temperate beech forest stand. Additionally, we evaluated the model’s sensitivity to parameterisation and associated uncertainty to help understand these effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e414">JSM is a soil biogeochemical model built on the backbone of the vertically explicit C-only SOC model COMISSION <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.34"/>. The COMISSION model was further developed from the conventional one by introducing a scalable maximum sorption capacity based on soil texture for dissolved organic C and microbial residues (Sect. S1.4<?pagebreak page785?> in the Supplement) as well as temperature and moisture rate modifiers for microbe-mediated processes and sorption (Sect. S1). We will investigate in a separate study how the maximum sorption capacity for mineral-associated organic C contributes to the observed patterns of SOC content and radiocarbon age. A schematic overview of JSM is presented in Fig. 1, and the mathematical description of the processes is provided in the Supplement. The model is integrated into the QUINCY <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.35"/> TBM modelling framework and can either be applied as a stand-alone soil model or coupled to the representation of the vegetation and surface processes. In this study, we applied JSM as a stand-alone model. JSM neither describes the energy and water processes at the atmosphere–soil interface or in the soil profile nor simulates the production of litter. Model inputs (soil temperature, moisture and water fluxes as well as plant litter data) were derived from the QUINCY model.</p>
      <p id="d1e423">JSM describes the formation and turnover of SOM along a vertical soil profile, which is explicitly represented as exponentially increasing layer thickness with increasing soil depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). The biogeochemical processes and pools of C, N and P are represented in each layer. Vertical transport of biogeochemical pools between the adjacent layers due to percolation and bioturbation is also modelled. To reflect the development of an organic layer, the model also includes an extra advective transport term which accounts for the upwards/downwards shift of the soil surface when the surface SOM accumulates/diminishes.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e429">Simulated dynamics of <bold>(a)</bold> SOC and <bold>(b)</bold> non-occluded inorganic P contents in topsoil (30 cm) and subsoil (30–100 cm) for 10 000 years. The three vertical dashed lines represent 200, 1000 and 5000 years.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e444">SOM is represented as pools of soluble, polymeric or woody litter as well as of dissolved organic matter (DOM), mineral-associated DOM, living microbial biomass, microbial residue (necromass) and mineral-associated microbial residue, each of which contains organic forms of C, N and P. The flows of organic N and P follow the pathways of C, with additional nutrient-specific processes, such as mineralisation and plant uptake, to link organic matter turnover with inorganic nutrient cycles. Microbial biomass is assumed to maintain a fixed stoichiometry in the model. It assimilates organic forms of C, N and P from DOM with fixed element use efficiencies and inorganic forms of N and P from soluble mineral pools. Microbes are assumed to aim to maximise their growth by maintaining high C use efficiency; however, when growth is limited by nutrients, microbes reduce their C use efficiency and increase nutrient mineralisation accordingly (See Sect. S1.5). The stoichiometry of all other SOM pools depends on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of influx and efflux, and these fluxes retain the stoichiometry of their source pools unless the formation processes involve respiration. In addition,<?pagebreak page786?> when microbes decay, nutrients are preferentially recycled to the DOM pool due to the low C-to-nutrient ratio in the cyctoplasma, as proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.36"/>. The inorganic pools of N and P include soluble inorganic ammonium (referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate (referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), soluble inorganic phosphate (referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as well as adsorbed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, absorbed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, occluded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and primary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The inorganic P cycle follows the QUINCY model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.37"/> and accounts for microbial interactions. JSM explicitly traces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.38"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.39"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e591">Enzymes are not explicitly modelled in JSM, although these are described implicitly to regulate processes such as depolymerisation and nutrient acquisition. For enzyme allocation within depolymerisation processes, we extended the microbial adaptation approach of the SEAM model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.40"/> by including P dependence of enzyme allocation and the assumption of a steady state of enzyme production, leading to the prediction that the total enzyme level is always proportional to the microbial biomass. The fractions of enzymes allocated to different depolymerisation sources (litter and microbial residue) are dynamically modelled to maximise the release of the most limiting microbial elements. JSM tracks three potential fractions of enzyme allocation, which represent cases in which microbes only maximise the depolymerisation release of C, N or P, respectively, and then updates the microbial enzyme allocation fraction by acclimating gradually to the potential fraction of the most limiting element (See Sect. S1.5.2). For nutrient competition between plant, microbes and soil adsorption sites (only for phosphate), the potential rates are calculated on the basis of the respective richness and half-saturation level of enzymes and the impacts of other competitors, following the ECA approach (See Sect. S2.2).</p>
      <p id="d1e597">The impacts of soil conditions on biogeochemical processes are also represented in JSM. The temperature response of different processes (e.g. microbial growth, decay, and nutrient uptake in Sect. S1.4) are represented by the Arrhenius equation with different activation energies. Moisture responses are described by two rate modifiers – one representing the effects of oxygen limitation (e.g. litter turnover in Sect. S1.2) and the other representing the effects of diffusion limitation (e.g. depolymerisation in Sect. S1.3). JSM also considers the effects of SOM content to correct bulk density (Sect. S3), which in turn affects other processes such as organic matter (Eq. S7) and phosphate (Eq. S25) sorption.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Site description and data for model analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e608">The Vessertal (VES) site is a mature beech (<italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic>) forest stand with an average tree age of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, located in the central uplands of Germany (Thuringian Forest mountain range). The intermediate elevation is 810 m a.s.l., with a high annual precipitation of 1200 mm and a mean annual temperature of 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.41"/>. It is one of the Level II intensive monitoring plots in the Pan-European International Co-operative Program for the assessment and monitoring of air pollution effects on forests (ICP Forests). Since 2013, the VES site has also been one of the main study sites in the German Research Foundation (DFG) priority<?pagebreak page787?> programme 1685 “Ecosystem Nutrition: Forest Strategies for Limited Phosphorus Resources”.</p>
      <p id="d1e636">Soil at the VES site is classified as Hyperdystric Skeletic Chromic Cambisol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.42"/>, with loamy topsoil and sandy loamy subsoil, overlain by a moder organic layer. The current soil developed on trachyandesite, and the development started at the end of the last ice age, 10–12 000 years ago <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.43"/>. The soil was sampled up to 1 m, with layer depths of 5–10 cm, for the measurements of total C, N, and organic and inorganic P and basic physical properties such as bulk density and soil texture. Soil from the A horizon alone was extracted for the estimation of microbial C, N and P pools. Detailed sampling and measurement approaches are described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.44"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e648">The soil contains 19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> C, 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 464 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> P up to 1 m soil depth, including the forest floor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.45"/>. The soil C content decreases from 510 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the forest floor to 126 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the A horizon to
5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 1 m depth. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of SOM slightly decreases from 19.5 in the forest floor to 14.75 at 1 m depth, whereas the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio decreases more steeply from 348.7 in the forest floor to 46.6 at 1 m depth. The organic P fraction of total P also decreases from 67 % in the organic layer to 13 % at 1 m depth. The microbial C content decreases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> C in the forest floor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.46"/> to 764 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> C in the top mineral soil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.47"/>. The microbial biomass shows a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 13 and a very low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 10.3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.48"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Model protocol, model experiments and sensitivity analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Model protocol</title>
      <p id="d1e908">The soil texture profiles for both QUINCY (for the generation of soil temperature, moisture and litterfall) and JSM simulations were obtained from observations at the VES site. The mineral-associated DOM and residue pools were initialised on the basis of Eq. (S7) using the observed soil texture and mineral soil density and assuming that the soil surface sorption sites are less occupied as soil depth increases. The vertical profile of the other SOM pools was initialised with a default C content for each pool in the first layer and assumed to decrease with soil depth in proportion to the fine root profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.49"/>, except in the woody litter, which is only initialised in the first layer. The initialisation C contents in the first layer for soluble litter, polymeric litter, woody litter, DOM, microbes and microbial residue were 291, 2914, 1000, 2.4, 73.2 and 203 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> C, respectively. The N and P contents of the SOM pools were initialised using the stoichiometry of different pools. For litter pools, we adapted the litter stoichiometry from the QUINCY model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.50"/>; for microbes and microbial residues, we used the measured microbial stoichiometry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.51"/>, and for other SOM pools, we used the measured average SOM stoichiometry of the 1 m soil profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.52"/>. All SOC profiles were initialised with a pre-industrial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for all C pools, from which the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were developed. The soil inorganic P pools were initialised using the soil P dataset from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.53"/>, corrected with the current total inorganic P from field measurements and extrapolated to the whole soil profile following the approach used in the QUINCY model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.54"/>. Organic matter material and mineral soil densities were solved using the Federer equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.55"/> with field data of the SOM content and bulk density.</p>
      <p id="d1e975">We first ran the QUINCY model for 500 years to generate soil forcing and then simulated the VES site for 200 years using JSM, repeating 30 years of soil forcing (half-hourly soil temperature, soil moisture, vertical water fluxes and vertically resolved litterfall that includes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values) simulated by the QUINCY model for the VES site. To mimic the history of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> input, we increased litter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content for the final 60 years before the end of the simulation, assuming that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in gross primary productivity in response to the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atmospheric pulse propagates directly into litterfall without any delay. We tested different simulation lengths (50, 200, 1000, 5000 and 10 000 years) and observed that the simulated SOM profiles changed slowly after 200 years but the soil inorganic P pools changed gradually as the simulation time increased (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b). In view of computational efficiency, we sought to compare the present-day soil profile observations with the simulated profiles for 200 years, which also best fit the date of soil inorganic P pool initialisation (1850, as indicated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="altparen.56"/>). All the other presented results (including sensitivity analysis) are also based on the 200-year simulations, and the results of long-term simulations (1000, 5000 and 10 000 years) are specified with their simulation times.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Model experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e1054">To further test the effects of different model features, we implemented several model experiments, including a SEAM-off scenario in which the enzyme allocation to polymeric litter and microbial residue are both fixed to 50 % (Eq. 1b), and an ECA-off scenario in which the ECA-based plant and microbial uptakes of inorganic N and P and soil adsorption of phosphate were switched off and replaced by a demand-based microbial uptake of inorganic N and P that ignored P adsorption flux (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1.4"/>). All model experiments used the same parameterisation from the calibrated model with full model features, which is denoted as the Base Scenario in this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e1059">The differences between Base Scenario and SEAM-off and ECA-off are listed below.</p>
      <?pagebreak page788?><p id="d1e1062"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?><italic>Base Scenario</italic>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1.2" content-type="subnumberedon"><label>1a</label><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Enz</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frac</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&amp;</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Enz</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frac</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calculated</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">as</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">for</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">microbes</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">and</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">adsorption</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calculated</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">as</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
            SEAM-off <italic>Scenario</italic>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1.3" content-type="numbered"><label>1b</label><mml:math id="M47" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Enz</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frac</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Enz</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frac</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            ECA-off <italic>Scenario</italic>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1.4" content-type="subnumberedoff"><label>1c</label><mml:math id="M48" display="block"><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fine</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">root</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">upt</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">upt</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">demand</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">adsorp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The plant uptake of inorganic N or P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the ECA-off scenario (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1.4"/>) uses the equations and parameters from the QUINCY model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.57"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1402">The annual soil C, N and P fluxes of model experiments at the study site. Positive values infer accumulation in the soil, and negative values infer loss from the soil. The values are the accumulated sum of the whole soil profile, calculated based on data from the last 10 years of model experiments. SOP: soil organic phosphorus; SON: soil organic nitrogen.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Unit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Base Scenario</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SEAM-Off</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ECA-Off</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1000 years</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5000 years</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10 000 years</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5">Biogeochemical fluxes </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C litterfall</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gC</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">788.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">788.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">788.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">788.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">788.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">788.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Respiration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">741.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">746.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">746.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">778.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">787.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">788.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> SOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">47.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N litterfall</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gN</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N deposition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gN</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plant N uptake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gN</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N leaching</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gN</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> SON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gN</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.002</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P litterfall</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mgP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">980.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">980.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">980.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">980.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">980.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">980.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P deposition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mgP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P weathering</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mgP</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">155.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">155.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">142.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">277.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">197.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">522.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plant P uptake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mgP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">852.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">866.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">886.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">920.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">959.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1134.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P leaching</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mgP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P desorption</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mgP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">233.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">185.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">157.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">345.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> SOP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mgP</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">520.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">516.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">424.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">399.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">63.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Calibration and model sensitivity</title>
      <p id="d1e2463">We calibrated the Base Scenario in two main steps. In the first step, we matched the model results with the measured SOC profile, mainly by calibrating the depolymerisation, organic matter sorption and litter turnover processes; in the second step, we matched the model results with the measured soil organic P profiles by calibrating the microbial growth and decay, nutrient acquisition, and soil inorganic P cycling. The two steps were not performed iteratively; however, during the second step, we revised the parameters from the first step as necessary. Other observed soil profiles, such as the soil organic N and the bulk density, were used as additional criteria to select parameterisation, although not specifically used to calibrate the model. During the calibration processes, parameter values were gradually changed and the goodness of model fit was visually evaluated on the basis of observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e2466">To test the effects of different microbial stoichiometry, we ran a “Glob Mic Stoi” scenario in which the global average microbial stoichiometry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.58"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref> was used to parameterise the model instead of the observed microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.59"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref>. To further test the model responses to different initial conditions, we ran the model with different initial SOM contents (50 %, 75 %, 150 % and 200 % of the default initial content) for 1000 years to ensure that the soil reached a more stable state.</p>
      <p id="d1e2525">We also tested the sensitivity of JSM to parameterisation using a hierarchical Latin hypercube design <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">LHS;</named-content></xref>. We selected 28 parameters from calibration (Table S1) and varied each parameter between 80 % and 120 % of the Base Scenario values given in Table S2, which were obtained through LHS sampling from a uniform distribution to form a set of 1000 LHS samples and used in model sensitivity and uncertainty analyses presented in this paper. We evaluated the model output from these simulations in terms of main biogeochemical fluxes (e.g. respiration, net N and P mineralisation, microbial uptake of inorganic N and P, N and P losses, and P biomineralisation) and the main SOM pools (up to 1 m depth) (e.g. total C, N and P in SOM; total soil inorganic P and microbial C, N and P). We measured parameter importance as the rank-transformed partial correlation coefficients (RPCCs) to account for potential non-linearities in the association between model parameters and output <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.61"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2537">Simulated and observed <bold>(a)</bold> SOC content, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in SOM, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in SOM, <bold>(d)</bold> organic-P-to-inorganic-P ratio in soil, <bold>(e)</bold> microbial C content, <bold>(f)</bold> microbial N content, <bold>(g)</bold> microbial P content and <bold>(h)</bold> soil bulk density at the study site up to 1 m soil depth. Black lines and dots: observations; coloured lines and shades: simulated mean values and ranges of standard deviation by different model experiments in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>. Microbial C, N and P values were only measured in the top 30 cm of soil. Simulated means and standard deviations were calculated using data from the last 10 years of model experiments.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Model stability and quasi-equilibrium state</title>
      <p id="d1e2614">We tested JSM with different initial SOM contents and different microbial stoichiometry. The simulated SOM profiles, including SOC; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of SOM; microbial C, N and P contents, and bulk density, did not respond strongly to changes in initial SOM contents (Fig. S2) but were notably affected by the assumed microbial stoichiometry (Fig. S1). We further examined the effects of simulation time on soil profile development (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and S1). SOC in the topsoil (30 cm) reached a stable state (ca. 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) after approximately 150 years and the subsoil (30–100 cm) reached a stable state (ca. 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) after approximately 1000 years. The accumulation rate of SOM decreased with time, but the complete soil profile had not yet reached a steady state (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) because C continues to accumulate slowly, particularly in deeper soil layers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m). Although the organic P dynamics follow the soil C dynamics, the inorganic P pools inevitably deplete in the long-term simulation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) due to high uncertainties in initialisation and P cycling processes. Therefore in this study, we focussed on the stable state of the topsoil (30 cm) at the end of the 200-year simulations and referred to it as a “quasi-equilibrium state” since slow changes are still occurring, particularly in soil inorganic P pools and SOM in deeper soil layers (Figs. S3, S4 and S5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Simulated SOM stocks and fluxes at the study site</title>
      <?pagebreak page790?><p id="d1e2706">We first compared the simulated profiles with the in situ observed ones (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). The modelled results agreed well with observed stock sizes and vertical patterns, indicating that the stocks (here we define the term “stock” as the total amount of all (model) pools within a larger set) of C, N and P pools in SOM show smaller temporal variations than the microbial pools at the quasi-equilibrium state (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a to c) due to strong seasonal variations in microbial biomass. We also found a greater variation in the simulated organic-P-to-inorganic-P (Po-to-Pi) ratio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d) than for the individual organic and inorganic P stocks (data not shown), inferring that the seasonal dynamics of microbes also impose a seasonal pattern of P immobilisation (from Pi to Po) and mineralisation (from Po to Pi).</p>
      <p id="d1e2715">The distribution and radiocarbon profile of total organic matter in the simulations varied across soil depths (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).
The first layer (0 cm, O–A horizon) is dominated by the plant litter and microbial component (living or dead microbes), and while the microbial component decreases strongly from ca. 40 % at 0 cm to almost zero at 50 cm soil depth, the litter component still constitutes ca. 10 % of the total SOC at 1 m soil depth. The mineral-associated C (MOC) component switches from a minor component in the O–A horizon (ca. 20 %) to the dominant component (ca. 90 % at 1 m) in deeper soil layers.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2721">Simulated SOC fractions (upper panels) and their respective radiocarbon profiles (bottom panels) at 1 m soil depth. Column <bold>(a)</bold>: mineral-associated C (MOC), including adsorbed DOM and adsorbed microbial residue; column <bold>(b)</bold>: litter, including woody, polymeric and soluble litter; column <bold>(c)</bold>: live and dead microbes. Data points are derived using data from the last 10 years of the model experiments. All model experiments used 200-year simulations and were not validated against the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2752">The simulated radiocarbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) profile qualitatively agreed with the observed one (Fig. S1e); the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C content increased within the O horizon and started decreasing with increasing soil depth from mineral soil, i.e. the A horizon. This pattern indicates that the “bomb pulse” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signal significantly affects the apparent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> age in the organic layer and its impact decreases with soil depth due to the slow turnover in deeper soil. Our simulations further indicated that such a vertical pattern is caused by MOC and microbial components, while the litter component stays modern throughout the profile (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Increases in litter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with depth suggest that more bomb-derived SOC is still found in subsoils due to slower litter turnover, while it is already replaced by more recent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-poorer SOC in the topsoil. Although the Base Scenario did not reproduce the measured radiocarbon profile, despite producing its vertical pattern, a much better fit with the measured radiocarbon profile and an increase in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> age, driven by MOC, were indeed observed as simulation time increased (Figs. S1e and S4).</p>
      <p id="d1e2840">The simulated biogeochemical fluxes show strong seasonal and vertical patterns (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), in which the flux rates in summer and in the topsoil are generally higher than those in winter and in the subsoil, respectively. Meanwhile, microbial inorganic N uptake shows a different seasonal pattern, with the lowest rates observed in August and September (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). In fact, this pattern is supported by the seasonal pattern of net N mineralisation flux, in which the peak is observed in August and September (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b). This result indicates that organic N in DOM is the most abundant for microbial growth during August and September, leading to a large reduction in the microbial inorganic N uptake and an increase in net N mineralisation. In contrast, organic P content in DOM is the lowest during August and September, leading to net P immobilisation and microbial inorganic P uptake elevation (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a). While the vertical pattern of plant N uptake parallels root distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.62"/>, plant P uptake is lower in the organic layer than in the topsoil due to strong competition from microbes in the organic layer (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2864">Simulated seasonal and vertical distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> respiration, <bold>(b)</bold> net N mineralisation, <bold>(c)</bold> biochemical P mineralisation and <bold>(d)</bold> net P mineralisation at the study site at 1 m soil depth. Points represent the mean values and error bars represent the standard deviations, both calculated using data from the last 10 years of model experiments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2886">Simulated seasonal and vertical distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> microbial inorganic P uptake, <bold>(b)</bold> plant P uptake, <bold>(c)</bold> microbial inorganic N uptake and <bold>(d)</bold> plant N uptake at the study site at 1 m soil depth. Points represent the mean values and error bars represent the standard deviations, both calculated using data from the last 10 years of model experiments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2907">The sources and sinks of soluble inorganic N and P also show very different patterns (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). The main source and sink for inorganic N in solution are gross mineralisation and plant uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, whereas for P, microbial uptake is the main sink and biomineralisation is a larger source than gross mineralisation in each scenario.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2924">Simulated yearly budget of <bold>(a)</bold> N and <bold>(b)</bold> P in soil solutions. In <bold>(a)</bold>, sourcing fluxes of N are presented in the order of gross mineralisation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and N deposition (in the bar plot: from right to the zero point; in the legend: from the top to the separation line); sinking fluxes of N are presented in the order of plant and microbial uptakes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, plant and microbial uptakes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N leaching (both inorganic and organic), and changes in soluble N content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">delta</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (in the bar plot: from left to the zero point; in the legend: from the separation line to the bottom). In <bold>(b)</bold>, sourcing fluxes of P include weathering, gross mineralisation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, biochemical mineralisation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and P deposition; sinking fluxes of P includes adsorption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Exchange</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fast</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), microbial and plant uptakes, P leaching (both inorganic and organic), and changes in soluble P content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">delta</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). (The order of presented processes follows the same rule as N.) The budgets are calculated using data from the full simulation (200 years) of the model experiments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Model features: nutrient acquisition competition and enzyme allocation</title>
      <p id="d1e3065">In general, the SEAM-off scenario did not differ much from the Base Scenario in terms of the main soil stocks and biogeochemical fluxes (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>); however, the ECA-off scenario produced a lower microbial biomass and Po-to-Pi ratio in the organic layer and topsoil. Total SOC may not be influenced in either scenario, although its composition and radiocarbon profile were both altered (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3074">We presented the uptake of inorganic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and competition between phosphate adsorption, uptake of inorganic P at three different depths (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>), and seasonal and vertical uptakes of inorganic N and P for both microbes and plants (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The simulations showed that microbes outcompeted roots for inorganic P uptake in JSM at all depths. However, the relative competitiveness of roots for phosphate uptake increased with increasing soil depth because the plant P uptake rate decreases less strongly than the microbial P uptake with increasing soil depth. In contrast, the phosphate adsorption rate increased strongly with increasing soil depth and outcompeted biological processes (plant and microbial uptake) in deeper soil layers. The relative competitiveness of phosphate adsorption against microbial and plant uptake also strongly decreased in summer in the topsoil due to high biological activity in warm months (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). With respect to competition for inorganic N, plants outcompeted microbes along the entire soil profile and throughout the year, particularly in summer when microbes assimilate N mainly from DOM (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c and d).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3097">Simulated <bold>(a)</bold> microbial and plant P uptake rates and <bold>(b)</bold> relative competitiveness (in fractions) of P adsorption, microbial P uptake and plant P uptake at depths of 0 (O–A horizon, upper panels), 15 (A–B horizon, middle panels) and 80 cm (B–C horizon, bottom panels). In <bold>(a)</bold>, monthly mean values at different depths are presented throughout the whole year; in <bold>(b)</bold>, relative competitiveness is calculated as the fraction of the individual rate to the sum of all three rates (P adsorption rate, microbial P uptake and plant P uptake). All data points are derived from data from the last 10 years of model experiments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3118">Turning off the model's feature for nutrient acquisition competition, i.e. ECA-off scenario, led to a notably lower microbial biomass and Po-to-Pi ratio in the topsoil (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). This is caused by concurrent changes in microbes and plant inorganic P uptake, particularly in the topsoil layer where plants take up more inorganic P than in the Base Scenario (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>) due to reduced competition with microbes. Moreover, there were differences in spatial and temporal variations in uptake and mineralisation fluxes between the ECA-off scenario and the other two scenarios. For instance, the seasonal variation in fluxes was notably lower in the ECA-off scenario. Decrease in P flux rate with soil depth may be weaker in the ECA-off scenario, but the decrease in net N mineralisation with soil depth is marginally stronger (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). This difference is because geophysical processes, such as adsorption and absorption, play more crucial roles in the soil P cycle than in the N cycle and because these show rather different seasonal and vertical patterns from the biochemical processes, such as mineralisation.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3131">The five most important parameters (Par) and their respective RPCCs for each output variable and the overall model importance (OVI). RPCCs were calculated for each output variable, and the overall importance of parameters was measured by calculating the mean of the absolute RPCCs across all output variables, weighted by the uncertainty contribution of these model outputs. The parameters are listed in Table S2 and explained in Table S1. SOP: soil organic phosphorus; SIP: soil inorganic phosphorus; SON: soil organic nitrogen.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Rank 1 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Rank 2 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">Rank 3 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">Rank 4 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center">Rank 5 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Par</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RPCC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Par</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RPCC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Par</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">RPCC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Par</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">RPCC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Par</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">RPCC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total SOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">depoly</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">depoly</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Total SON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">depoly</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Total SOP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">biomin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Total SIP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">weath</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">biomin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Microbial C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Microbial N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Microbial P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Respiration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">depoly</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">mic<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cue</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Net N mineralisation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">depoly</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">mic<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cue</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Microbial N uptake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mic<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nue</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Net P mineralisation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> P Biomineralisation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> Microbial P uptake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mic<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pue</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> N losses</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">upt</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">biomin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> P losses</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">upt</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mic<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pue</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">mic<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cue</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">enz</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.9mm}}?> OVI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e5363">The modelled enzyme allocation for depolymerisation is presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>. We compared the enzyme allocation curve of polymeric litter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Enz</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frac</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. S17) with three potential allocation curves (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">poly</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for C, N<?pagebreak page791?> and P in Eq. S15), which represent cases in which microbes only maximise C, N or P release from depolymerisation. All modelled fractions of enzyme allocation to polymeric litter were well below 50 % for the whole soil profile, indicating that polymeric litter is less preferred than microbial residues for depolymerisation in the soil, particularly in very deep soil layers where no roots are present and microbes would thus only produce enzyme to depolymerise microbial residues because the content of residue is much higher than that of polymeric litter. The simulated curve of allocation overlaps with the curve of potential allocation to maximise P release, indicating that depolymerisation is solely driven by P demand. This explains why microbial residues are preferred over polymeric litter since the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of microbial residues is much lower than that of polymeric litter (data not shown).
Despite rather different enzyme allocation fractions shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>, the majority of the modelled stocks and fluxes were not significantly influenced when enzyme allocation was turned off (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). More profound differences were observed in the composition and radiocarbon profile of SOC; there was less litter and more SOC in the SEAM-off scenario than in the Base Scenario, resulting a systematic difference in the radiocarbon profiles between the two scenarios (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5423">Simulated enzyme allocation to polymeric litter compared with potential enzyme allocations to polymeric litter given that the element C, N or P is the most limiting. Black lines: fraction of enzyme allocated to polymeric litter; orange, blue or green lines: potential enzyme allocation to polymeric litter to maximise C, N or P, respectively. <bold>(a)</bold> Base Scenario; <bold>(b)</bold> SEAM-off scenario; <bold>(c)</bold> ECA-off scenario. All data points are derived from data from the last 10 years of model experiments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Model sensitivity and uncertainties</title>
      <p id="d1e5449">The interquartile range of outputs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>) from model sensitivity analysis revealed that all outputs were well centred around the results of the parameterisation of the Base Scenario (Table S2), except microbial inorganic N uptake and N losses. In general, the soil stocks were more stable than the microbial pools and biogeochemical fluxes. N mineralisation was surprisingly insensitive while microbial inorganic N uptake was very sensitive to parameterisation. N mineralisation in JSM was mainly driven by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of DOM, which remains rather stable due to the similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of plant litter, microbes and microbial residues. The very sensitive response of microbial inorganic N uptake was attributed to the high-affinity (low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value) N uptake transporters of microbes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.63"/> and their sensitivity to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. The RPCC of parameters with outputs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>) also demonstrated that the C and N contents of SOM as well as the C and N fluxes were more sensitive to changes in C processes, such as depolymerisation, organic matter sorption and litter partitioning, while the microbial dynamics and the P fluxes were more sensitive to changes in microbial and nutrient processes, such as maximum biomineralisation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">biomin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and P recycling during microbial decay (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Overall, most of the selected outputs were strongly influenced by microbial stoichiometry.<?pagebreak page792?> The five most influencing parameters in JSM were microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), microbial mortality rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mic</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), soluble litter C fraction transformed into DOM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sol</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and P fraction recycled from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during microbial decay (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e5681">Normalised output variations in the LHS sensitivity analysis. The selected output variables include respiration; total soil organic C, N and P; microbial C, N and P; net N mineralisation; microbial N uptake; net P mineralisation; biomineralisation of P; microbial P uptake and N and P losses. All the calculations are performed for the topmost 1 m of soil based on data from the last 10 years of 1000 LHS simulations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/783/2020/gmd-13-783-2020-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Features of nutrient cycling</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>Soil stoichiometry</title>
      <p id="d1e5714">Following calibration, JSM could reproduce the main soil stocks of C, N and P; microbial biomass; and soil bulk density as well as their vertical patterns along the soil profile in a beech forest stand in Germany. The observed SOM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (19.5) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (348) in the first model layer – the O–A horizon – fit well within the ranges of the reported soil stoichiometry of temperate broadleaf forests <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.64"/>, and there was a much stronger decreasing trend in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio than in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio with an increase in soil depth, indicating that organic P in SOM is “decoupled” from the C and N cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.65"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5772"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>This decoupling of the soil P cycle is represented by biomineralisation in TBMs; however, the vertical decoupling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stoichiometry is poorly reproduced (Fig. S6) even when microbial biomass is explicitly represented <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.66"/>. Our study indicated that the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is mainly due to a shift in SOC composition with soil depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), whereby the fraction of the nutrient-poor litter component decreases and the nutrient-rich MOC component increases. Slight overestimation of the modelled soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in the first layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) is probably due to the higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (52) of leaf litter inputs than the observed one (41.7).</p>
      <?pagebreak page793?><p id="d1e5836">However, with respect to the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, the model simulations indicated that the change in microbial nutrient recycling scheme with depth might be associated with shift in the SOC component. To account for different stoichiometry of cell walls and plasma of microbes in JSM, we introduced the microbial nutrient recycling parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dom</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, X for N or P) that partitions microbial residues with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio according to P stoichiometry; that is, a higher nutrient content is allocated to DOM, while the residual pool receives the remaining part with a lower nutrient content. Since JSM currently does not distinguish between microbial guilds, the microbial nutrient recycling parameters also mimic different stoichiometry of microbial guilds, such as bacteria and fungi. The model only adequately reproduced the vertical SOM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio profile when the microbial P recycling parameter decreases with increasing depth, resulting in a decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio with increasing soil depth. Such a shift in the microbial P recycling parameters indicates changes in microbial communities from a nutrient-poor fungi-dominated to a nutrient-rich bacteria-dominated one with increasing depth, which has also been evidenced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.67"/>. Our model suggests that this community shift mainly regulates the decrease in SOM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio at the study site.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><title>N cycle vs. P cycle</title>
      <p id="d1e5933">JSM had already reached a quasi-equilibrium state at the end of the 200-year simulation, when the respiration of C and plant uptake of N and P were very close to the C, N and P from litterfall and SOM accumulated slowly in the soil (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). As the simulation time increased, the C and N cycles approached true equilibrium but the P cycle did not (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>); this could be due to the lack of vegetation feedback or the constantly increasing occluded P pool and decreasing primary P pool that do not make it possible to reach true equilibrium in JSM. Similar trends have been observed with all TBMs because they employ the structure of the inorganic P cycle described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.68"/>. This leads to a boundary issue, particularly in long-term simulations, and warrants further investigation, particularly for the development of soil profiles.</p>
      <p id="d1e5945">In JSM, plant nutrient uptake is driven by root biomass (prescribed by the QUINCY outputs) and its uptake capacity (as reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx27" id="altparen.69"/>). Plant uptake is further influenced by microbial (P adsorption) competition, but it is not regulated by plant demand due to the absence of vegetation processes. The simulated plant N and P uptakes at the quasi-equilibrium state were very close to the N and P inputs from the litterfall (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), indicating that realistic root biomass and uptake capacity enable the simulation of nutrient uptake for plants. This finding supports the recent change in plant uptake simulations in TBMs from plant demand driven <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.70"/> to trait (root biomass, uptake capacity and inorganic nutrient pool) driven <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.71"/>, which strengthens the interactions between soil nutrient availability and plant growth.</p>
      <p id="d1e5959">The simulated microbial uptake of inorganic P (238.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was much higher than the plant inorganic P uptake (8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ha</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and microbial inorganic N uptake (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). This difference was strongly driven by the difference between litterfall and microbial stoichiometry. In JSM, nutrient assimilation for microbial growth occurs in two steps. In the first one, a certain fraction of N and P (mic<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nue</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mic<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pue</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) from microbial DOM<?pagebreak page794?> uptake is assimilated directly by microbes; in the second step, dissolved inorganic N and P are further taken up by microbes through microbial inorganic N and P uptake to fulfil their stoichiometry. In the Base Scenario, we used the measured microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio at the study site (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which largely differs from the litterfall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), particularly in terms of the P content. Therefore, although the demand for N and P for microbial growth does not differ much, the assimilation of dissolved organic N is much higher than that of dissolved organic P, resulting in a much higher demand for microbial P uptake than for N uptake from the inorganic pool and very different seasonal patterns of microbial inorganic N and P uptakes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). This is well demonstrated in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>; net mineralisation, calculated by subtracting microbial inorganic nutrient uptake from gross mineralisation, is always positive for N and mostly negative for P, particularly in the warm season when microbial biomass is high. While the majority of the mineralised N is taken up by plants, only a minor fraction of mineralised P is taken up by them, and most of it, together with the additional biomineralised P, is taken up by microbes in the form of dissolved inorganic P. This pattern implies that the mobilisation of soil N is driven by plant demand and that of soil P is driven by microbial demand.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>4.1.3</label><title>Microbial stoichiometry</title>
      <p id="d1e6120">Since the microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio we used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.72"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref> was very different from the global average value <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.73"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref>, additional modelling experiments were conducted with the global microbial stoichiometry to examine the effects of this ratio (Figs. S1 and S3–S5). The SOC and microbial C profiles did not differ significantly in the new scenarios, although the N and P stocks and fluxes were greatly influenced. As a direct consequence of a change in microbial stoichiometry change, the resultant SOM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios became lower and higher, respectively, than values in the Base Scenario. Moreover, the total demand for microbial N was much higher and the demand for microbial P was much lower than that in the Base Scenario, leading to a higher microbial inorganic N uptake and lower microbial inorganic P uptake, which in turn alter the plant–microbe competition for inorganic N and P as well as the vertical and seasonal patterns of plant and microbial uptake of inorganic nutrients. Although the microbial P demand was lower in the scenario with the global microbial stoichiometry than in the<?pagebreak page795?> Base Scenario, it still drove the soil P mobilisation. However, N mobilisation in the new scenario was no longer exclusively plant driven and became both microbe and plant driven. This indicates that the microbial stoichiometry is a key factor for soil nutrient processes and plant–soil interactions in JSM.</p>
      <p id="d1e6203">In JSM, the choice of nutrient mineralisation–immobilisation pathways <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.74"/> during microbial DOM uptake, i.e. the microbial nutrient use efficiencies in Eq. (S13), did not greatly change the total microbial nutrient assimilation but significantly impacted the partitioning between organic (microbial DOM uptake) and inorganic (microbial inorganic nutrient uptake) nutrient assimilation (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). This partitioning greatly alters the isotopic signals of soil pools and is essential to understanding soil nutrient cycling and thus to unravelling soil effects based on vegetation signals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.75"/> – something which is not possible with the current TBMs due to poorly defined and parameterised microbial nutrient use efficiencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.76"/>. It is possible to use JSM to predict realistic microbial nutrient use efficiencies with constraints of tracer experiments by labelling different forms of dissolved nutrients. However, future detailed investigation is needed due to complications arising from other involved processes such as adsorption–desorption and nitrification–denitrification.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Key features and model limitations</title>
      <p id="d1e6226">We applied the ECA approach described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.77"/> to simulate inorganic nutrient competition. In general, our model simulations indicated that microbes take up more inorganic P than plants, which supports the findings of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>P tracer experiments at two other beech forests in Germany <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.78"/>. However, our study showed that plants take up more inorganic N than microbes (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a and S1). This pattern seems to disagree with the findings of field studies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N addition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.79"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and a modelling study using the same approach to simulate competition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.80"/>. The reason for this disagreement is that in JSM, we assumed high microbial N use efficiency from DOM, and the majority of microbial N assimilation was actually fulfilled by DOM uptake. Therefore, plants take up more inorganic N than microbes. However, in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N tracer experiments and a model study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.81"/>, there was no distinction between assimilation from organic and inorganic sources; thus, microbes outcompete plants in the sense that the total N assimilated by<?pagebreak page796?> microbes exceeds the total N taken up by plant roots, which was also true in our study. Another uncertainty related to the plant–microbe competition for inorganic N is the microbial stoichiometry we used in parameterisation. As discussed in the previous section, a change in microbial stoichiometry from the observed field value to the global average value resulted in a switch from microbes outcompeting plants for inorganic N to the opposite trend. Additionally, the choice of microbial nutrient use efficiencies not only affected the microbial demand for inorganic nutrients and the concentrations of inorganic N and P, thereby influencing the potential uptake rates of microbes and roots.</p>
      <p id="d1e6276">We extended the enzyme allocation approach of the SEAM model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.82"/> by including P dependence and vertical explicitness and by assuming a steady state of enzyme production. Due to the very small microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio used in model parameterisation, our results indicated that depolymerisation is solely driven by P demand; thus, microbial residues are the preferred substrate because they have a much lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio than polymeric litter. This is also supported by the massive P biomineralisation flux (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) independent of depolymerisation and gross mineralisation, indicating that microbial growth is strongly P limited. Even in the scenario using the global microbial stoichiometry, depolymerisation was still solely P driven, and P biomineralisation fulfilled over half of the microbial P demand (Fig. S5). This result is partly supported by the global enzymatic activity data, in which global ratios of specific C, N and P acquisition activities converged on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.83"/>, while the global microbial stoichiometry was much higher, indicating that relatively more resources are allocated to acquire P than to acquire N and C. This result actually reveals a caveat in the current implementation of enzyme allocation in JSM: the main process via which organic P is hydrolysed, biomineralisation and the mobilisation of sorbed inorganic P due to root exudation are not included in the enzyme allocation calculation. It also explains the very small difference between the Base Scenario and the SEAM-off scenario.</p>
      <p id="d1e6328">JSM demonstrated a capacity to reproduce the vertical patterns of soil stocks (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) and to satisfactorily produce both vertical and seasonal patterns of biogeochemical fluxes (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). While the seasonal patterns are primarily driven by the temperature response of the represented processes, the vertical patterns are shaped by the combined effects of biochemical and geophysical factors represented in the model. As seen in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, although total SOC decreased with soil depth, the microbial, litter and MOC components showed very different patterns. Following the COMISSION model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.84"/>, we constrained the capacity of organo-mineral association with silt and clay contents and soil bulk density in JSM. In the organic layer<?pagebreak page797?> and topsoil, the continuous litter input sustains a large microbial biomass and microbial residue pool; however, due to the very low bulk density and relatively low silt and clay contents, sorption is weak and MOC content is very low. As soil depth increases, bulk density and silt and clay contents increase such that microbial residues and DOM stabilise to a greater extent. This hinders microbial DOM assimilation and nutrient immobilisation, leading to a strong decline in microbial biomass and an increase in MOC. As a consequence of the decreasing microbial biomass and litter inputs, much less microbial residue and DOM are available for sorption to the mineral soil, which explains the observed decrease in total SOC in deep soil layers.</p>
      <p id="d1e6345">Nonetheless, certain caveats of this study and JSM should be discussed. A main challenge is the different simulation times for different purposes. Our results indicated that in the upmost 30 cm of soil, SOM content stabilises after 150 years, while in the upmost 1 m SOM stabilises after 1000 years of simulation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), regardless of the initial SOM content (Fig. S2). However, with respect to the radiocarbon profile, as indicated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.85"/>, a very long simulation time (13 500 years) was required to match both the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SOC profiles at a nearby Norway spruce forest site. In our study, a 10 000-year simulation time was still not sufficient to match the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile, indicating that an even longer simulation time is required. Although JSM is very stable in the long term in terms of SOM development and storage, long-term simulation of soil P balance as a result of continuous weathering and occlusion remains a  significant challenge (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Such a long simulation time is unrealistic for the P cycle due to the unknown conditions of the initial soil P pools and the un-equilibrated soil inorganic P cycling processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.86"/>. Although we used a much shorter simulation length in this study, noticeable uncertainties remain due to inorganic P cycling parameters (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). Additionally, the long simulation time required to match the radiocarbon profiles is also problematic for future coupling to TBMs because these models typically examine centennial timescales. A possible solution is to spin up radiocarbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 years) independent of the plant–soil spin-up (1000 years), although this approach needs to be properly tested in the future.</p>
      <p id="d1e6400">Another caveat involves the model's representation of microbial adaptation schemes. In JSM, we describe enzyme allocation, which is one of the schemes of microbial adaptation proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.87"/>; however, as discussed above, enzyme allocation to phosphatases might be essential and might thus need to be included. Additionally, we found out that another adaptation scheme, the microbial community shift between fungi and bacteria, is crucial for reproducing the vertical pattern of soil stoichiometry. Although we mimicked such a shift in this study by<?pagebreak page798?> calibration and parameterisation, a more mechanistic representation is necessary in the future for representing the acclimation of microbial functional properties to climate and environmental changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e6406">Concerning the model's description of N dynamics, in the current version, N processes such as nitrification–denitrification and abiotic ammonium adsorption are not yet implemented. Although the simplified N dynamics will probably not alter the main findings of this study, it is important to investigate these in the future since plants often have a preference for ammonium uptake <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.88"/>. Finally, given the good quality of the input data, JSM could adequately reproduce the soil stocks and flux rates at the selected study site; however, its capacity to extrapolate to other climate and soil conditions needs to be further investigated in the future.</p>
      <p id="d1e6412">JSM is highly non-linear and sensitive to the parameters controlling microbial growth and decay (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). The C and N stocks in SOM as well as respiration and net N mineralisation are highly sensitive to the parameter changes of depolymerisation and organo-mineral association, whereas the organic or inorganic P stocks and P mineralisation are highly sensitive to the microbial processes. These trends support, and also explain, the finding of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.89"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.90"/> that the P cycle is decoupled from the C and N cycles in the soil. A more in-depth explanation of this difference, based on our results, is that the gross mineralisation associated with microbial DOM uptake can supply microbes and plants with sufficient N but not P; thus, a large amount of P needs to be mobilised, particularly from SOM as well as from mineral pools, to sustain microbial growth. Therefore, the microbial pools and soil P stocks or fluxes are highly sensitive to microbial processes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and future directions</title>
      <p id="d1e6432">We presented the mathematical formulation for a new SOC model – JSM – which is an extension of the vertically explicit, microbially based and organo-mineral association-enabled SOC model, COMISSION, developed by introducing the N and P processes via novel approaches such as optimised enzyme allocation, nutrient acquisition competition and process acclimation. The model was evaluated with the observed C, N and P stocks of SOM; soil inorganic P stock; microbial C, N and P contents; and soil bulk density in the topmost 1 m of soil in a beech forest stand in Germany. JSM captured the extents and vertical patterns of these observations. We further presented the main features of nutrient cycling under the new model structure and the sensitivities of model outputs to parameter changes; both indicated that<?pagebreak page799?> the P cycle is largely decoupled from the C and N cycles and shows very close associations with microbial dynamics. Evaluation of model experiments underscores the need for improved representation of microbial dynamics in JSM, particularly their interactions with the P cycle.</p>
      <p id="d1e6435">To better represent microbial dynamics, we would need a detailed and advanced understanding of microbial processes from experiments for implementation and testing in the model. For example, how will microbial C use efficiency change in response to changes in C sources (e.g. DOM or litter addition) and nutrient availability (e.g. N and P addition)? How starkly does the microbial community adjust its stoichiometry, change its element use efficiency or alter extracellular enzyme synthesis under dynamic external conditions?</p>
      <p id="d1e6438">Next steps for the evaluation of JSM are to investigate the effects of P cycling on microbial dynamics and SOM cycling in greater detail by subjecting it to other beech forest sites in Germany along a soil P availability gradient and to evaluate whether the contrasting P cycling patterns proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.91"/> – “acquiring system” and “recycling system” – can be reproduced. Such a model evaluation is expected to identify the key or missing processes of the model to reproduce the contrasting P cycling schemes and to assess their effects on the SOM turnover or stability.</p>
      <p id="d1e6444">JSM was developed under the framework of the new biosphere model QUINCY, and the future plan is to apply this model coupled with the vegetation component of the QUINCY model described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.92"/>, which will offer an alternative to better represent the interactions between root growth or activity and SOM turnover and stabilisation in TBMs.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6454">JSM is developed using the framework of the QUINCY model and is licensed under GNU GPL version 3. The scientific code of JSM requires software from the MPI-ESM environment, which is subject to the MPI-M-Software-License-Agreement in its most recent form (<uri>http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/models/license</uri>, last access: 14 November 2019; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="altparen.93"/>). The source code is available online (<uri>https://git.bgc-jena.mpg.de/quincy/quincy-model-release</uri>, branch “jsm/release01”; <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17871/quincy-model-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17871/quincy-model-2019</ext-link>, Yu et al., 2019), but access is restricted to registered users. Readers interested in running the model should request a username and password from the corresponding authors or via the git repository. Model users are strongly encouraged to follow the fair-use policy stated at <uri>https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgi/index.php/Projects/QUINCYModel</uri> (last access: 14 November 2019; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="altparen.94"/>).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6476">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-783-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-783-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6485">SZ and MS conceived the model. LY and SZ developed the model. MS measured the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and writing of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6503">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6509">We are grateful to Friederike Lang, Jaane Krüger and other co-workers in the framework of the Priority Program SPP 1685 “Ecosystem Nutrition: Forest Strategies for Limited Phosphorus Resources” of the German Research Foundation (DFG) for measuring and providing the site data. We are grateful to Jan Engel for technical assistance in developing the code and to Marleen Pallandt for improving the
quality of the paper. The authors are grateful to William Wieder and the other two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved this paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6514">This research has been supported by DFG (grant no. ZA 763/2-1 and grant no. SCHR 1181/3-1).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Max Planck Society.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6523">This paper was edited by David Lawrence and reviewed by William Wieder and two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Abramoff et al.(2017)Abramoff, Davidson, and Finzi</label><?label Abramoff:2017?><mixed-citation>Abramoff, R. Z., Davidson, E. A., and Finzi, A. C.: A parsimonious modular
approach to building a mechanistic belowground carbon and nitrogen model,
J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci., 122, 2418–2434,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003796" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JG003796</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Ahrens et al.(2015)Ahrens, Braakhekke, Guggenberger, Schrumpf, and
Reichstein</label><?label Ahrens:2015?><mixed-citation>Ahrens, B., Braakhekke, M. C., Guggenberger, G., Schrumpf, M., and Reichstein,
M.: Contribution of sorption, DOC transport and microbial interactions to the
14C age of a soil organic carbon profile: Insights from a calibrated process
model, Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 390–402,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.008</ext-link>,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Ahrens et al.(2020)Ahrens, Reichstein, Guggenberger, and
Schrumpf</label><?label Ahrens:2019?><mixed-citation>
Ahrens, B., Reichstein, M., Guggenberger, G., and Schrumpf, M.: Towards
reconciling radiocarbon and carbon in soils: the importance of modelling
organo-mineral associations, Soil Biol. Biogeochem., under review, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Allison and Vitousek(2005)</label><?label Allison:2005?><mixed-citation>Allison, S. D. and Vitousek, P. M.: Responses of extracellular enzymes to
simple and complex nutrient inputs, Soil Biol. Biochem., 37,
937–944, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Arora et al.(2013)Arora, Boer, Friedlingstein, Eby, Jones, Christian,
Bonan, Bopp, Brovkin, Cadule, Hajima, Ilyina, Lindsay, Tjiputra, and
Wu</label><?label Arora:2013?><mixed-citation>Arora, V. K., Boer, G. J., Friedlingstein, P., Eby, M., Jones, C. D.,
Christian, J. R., Bonan, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Hajima, T.,
Ilyina, T., Lindsay, K., Tjiputra, J. F., and Wu, T.: Carbon–Concentration
and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models, J.
Climate, 26, 5289–5314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00494.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00494.1</ext-link>,  2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page800?><ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bergkemper et al.(2016)Bergkemper, Bunemann, Hauenstein, Heuck,
Kandeler, Kruger, Marhan, Meszaros, Nassal, Nassal, Oelmann, Pistocchi,
Schloter, Spohn, Talkner, Zederer, and Schulz</label><?label Bergkemper:2016?><mixed-citation>Bergkemper, F., Bunemann, E. K., Hauenstein, S., Heuck, C., Kandeler, E.,
Kruger, J., Marhan, S., Meszaros, E., Nassal, D., Nassal, P., Oelmann, Y.,
Pistocchi, C., Schloter, M., Spohn, M., Talkner, U., Zederer, D. P., and
Schulz, S.: An inter-laboratory comparison of gaseous and liquid fumigation
based methods for measuring microbial phosphorus (Pmic) in forest soils with
differing P stocks, J. Microbiol. Methods, 128, 66–68,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.006</ext-link>,  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bloor et al.(2009)Bloor, Niboyet, Leadley, and Barthes</label><?label Bloor:2009?><mixed-citation>Bloor, J. M. G., Niboyet, A., Leadley, P. W., and Barthes, L.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
inorganic N supply modify competition for N between co-occurring grass
plants, tree seedlings and soil microorganisms, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 41, 544–552,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.013</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bond-Lamberty et al.(2018)Bond-Lamberty, Bailey, Chen, Gough, and
Vargas</label><?label Bond-Lamberty:2018?><mixed-citation>Bond-Lamberty, B., Bailey, V. L., Chen, M., Gough, C. M., and Vargas, R.:
Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades, Nature,
560, 80–83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0358-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-018-0358-x</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bradford et al.(2016)Bradford, Wieder, Bonan, Fierer, Raymond, and
Crowther</label><?label Bradford:2016?><mixed-citation>Bradford, M. A., Wieder, W. R., Bonan, G. B., Fierer, N., Raymond, P. A., and
Crowther, T. W.: Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate
change, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 751, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate3071</ext-link>,  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bünemann et al.(2016)Bünemann, Augstburger, and
Frossard</label><?label Buenemann:2016?><mixed-citation>Bünemann, E. K., Augstburger, S., and Frossard, E.: Dominance of either
physicochemical or biological phosphorus cycling processes in temperate
forest soils of contrasting phosphate availability, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 101, 85–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Ciais et al.(2013)Ciais, Sabine, Bala, Bopp, Brovkin, Canadell,
Chhabra, DeFries, Galloway, Heimann, Jones, Quéré, Myneni, Piao, and
Thornton</label><?label Ciais:2013?><mixed-citation>Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J., Chhabra,
A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Quéré, C. L.,
Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and Other Biogeochemical
Cycles, pp. 465–570, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
and New York, NY, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.015</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Craine et al.(2007)Craine, Morrow, and Fierer</label><?label Craine:2007?><mixed-citation>Craine, J. M., Morrow, C., and Fierer, N.: Microbial nitrogen limitation
increases decomposition, Ecology, 88, 2105–2113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1847.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/06-1847.1</ext-link>,  2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Craine et al.(2018)Craine, Elmore, Wang, Aranibar, Bauters, Boeckx,
Crowley, Dawes, Delzon, Fajardo, Fang, Fujiyoshi, Gray, Guerrieri, Gundale,
Hawke, Hietz, Jonard, Kearsley, Kenzo, Makarov, Marañón-Jiménez, McGlynn,
McNeil, Mosher, Nelson, Peri, Roggy, Sanders-DeMott, Song, Szpak, Templer,
Van der Colff, Werner, Xu, Yang, Yu, and Zmudczyńska-Skarbek</label><?label Craine:2018?><mixed-citation>Craine, J. M., Elmore, A. J., Wang, L., Aranibar, J., Bauters, M., Boeckx, P.,
Crowley, B. E., Dawes, M. A., Delzon, S., Fajardo, A., Fang, Y., Fujiyoshi,
L., Gray, A., Guerrieri, R., Gundale, M. J., Hawke, D. J., Hietz, P., Jonard,
M., Kearsley, E., Kenzo, T., Makarov, M., Marañón-Jiménez, S., McGlynn,
T. P., McNeil, B. E., Mosher, S. G., Nelson, D. M., Peri, P. L., Roggy,
J. C., Sanders-DeMott, R., Song, M., Szpak, P., Templer, P. H., Van der
Colff, D., Werner, C., Xu, X., Yang, Y., Yu, G., and Zmudczyńska-Skarbek,
K.: Isotopic evidence for oligotrophication of terrestrial ecosystems, Nat.
Ecol. Evolut., 2, 1735–1744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0694-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41559-018-0694-0</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Dannenmann et al.(2016)Dannenmann, Bimüller, Gschwendtner,
Leberecht, Tejedor, Bilela, Gasche, Hanewinkel, Baltensweiler,
Kögel-Knabner, Polle, Schloter, Simon, and Rennenberg</label><?label Dannenmann:2016?><mixed-citation>Dannenmann, M., Bimüller, C., Gschwendtner, S., Leberecht, M., Tejedor, J.,
Bilela, S., Gasche, R., Hanewinkel, M., Baltensweiler, A., Kögel-Knabner,
I., Polle, A., Schloter, M., Simon, J., and Rennenberg, H.: Climate Change
Impairs Nitrogen Cycling in European Beech Forests, PLOS ONE, 11, e0158823,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158823" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0158823</ext-link>,  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Drake et al.(2011)Drake, Gallet-Budynek, Hofmockel, Bernhardt,
Billings, Jackson, Johnsen, Lichter, McCarthy, McCormack, Moore, Oren,
Palmroth, Phillips, Pippen, Pritchard, Treseder, Schlesinger, DeLucia, and
Finzi</label><?label Drake:2011?><mixed-citation>Drake, J. E., Gallet-Budynek, A., Hofmockel, K. S., Bernhardt, E. S., Billings,
S. A., Jackson, R. B., Johnsen, K. S., Lichter, J., McCarthy, H. R.,
McCormack, M. L., Moore, D. J. P., Oren, R., Palmroth, S., Phillips, R. P.,
Pippen, J. S., Pritchard, S. G., Treseder, K. K., Schlesinger, W. H.,
DeLucia, E. H., and Finzi, A. C.: Increases in the flux of carbon belowground
stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest
productivity under elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ecol. Lett., 14, 349–357,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01593.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01593.x</ext-link>,  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Ellsworth et al.(2017)Ellsworth, Anderson, Crous, Cooke, Drake,
Gherlenda, Gimeno, Macdonald, Medlyn, Powell, Tjoelker, and
Reich</label><?label Ellsworth:2017?><mixed-citation>Ellsworth, D., Anderson, I., Crous, K., Cooke, J., Drake, J., Gherlenda, A.,
Gimeno, T., Macdonald, C., Medlyn, B., Powell, J., Tjoelker, M., and Reich,
P.: Elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a
low-phosphorus soil, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 279–282,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate3235</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Federer et al.(1993)Federer, Turcotte, and Smith</label><?label Federer:1993?><mixed-citation>Federer, C. A., Turcotte, D. E., and Smith, C. T.: The organic fraction–bulk
density relationship and the expression of nutrient content in forest soils,
Can. J. Forest Res., 23, 1026–1032, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/x93-131</ext-link>,  1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Fleischer et al.(2019)Fleischer, Rammig, De Kauwe, Walker, Domingues,
Fuchslueger, Garcia, Goll, Grandis, Jiang, Haverd, Hofhansl, Holm, Kruijt,
Leung, Medlyn, Mercado, Norby, Pak, von Randow, Quesada, Schaap,
Valverde-Barrantes, Wang, Yang, Zaehle, Zhu, and Lapola</label><?label Fleischer:2019?><mixed-citation>Fleischer, K., Rammig, A., De Kauwe, M. G., Walker, A. P., Domingues, T. F.,
Fuchslueger, L., Garcia, S., Goll, D. S., Grandis, A., Jiang, M., Haverd, V.,
Hofhansl, F., Holm, J. A., Kruijt, B., Leung, F., Medlyn, B. E., Mercado,
L. M., Norby, R. J., Pak, B., von Randow, C., Quesada, C. A., Schaap, K. J.,
Valverde-Barrantes, O. J., Wang, Y.-P., Yang, X., Zaehle, S., Zhu, Q., and
Lapola, D. M.: Amazon forest response to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fertilization dependent on plant
phosphorus acquisition, Nat. Geosci., 12, 736–741,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0404-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-019-0404-9</ext-link>,  2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Fujita et al.(2017)Fujita, Kunito, Moro, Toda, Otsuka, and
Nagaoka</label><?label Fujita:2017?><mixed-citation>Fujita, K., Kunito, T., Moro, H., Toda, H., Otsuka, S., and Nagaoka, K.:
Microbial resource allocation for phosphatase synthesis reflects the
availability of inorganic phosphorus across various soils, Biogeochem.,
136, 325–339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0398-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-017-0398-6</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Goll et al.(2017)Goll, Vuichard, Maignan, Jornet-Puig, Sardans,
Violette, Peng, Sun, Kvakic, Guimberteau, Guenet, Zaehle, Penuelas, Janssens,
and Ciais</label><?label Goll:2017?><mixed-citation>Goll, D. S., Vuichard, N., Maignan, F., Jornet-Puig, A., Sardans, J., Violette, A., Peng, S., Sun, Y., Kvakic, M., Guimberteau, M., Guenet, B., Zaehle, S., Penuelas, J., Janssens, I., and Ciais, P.: A representation of the phosphorus cycle for ORCHIDEE (revision 4520), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3745–3770, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3745-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-3745-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Hinsinger et al.(2011)Hinsinger, Brauman, Devau, Gérard, Jourdan,
Laclau, Le Cadre, Jaillard, and Plassard</label><?label Hinsinger:2011?><mixed-citation>Hinsinger, P., Brauman, A., Devau, N., Gérard, F., Jourdan, C., Laclau, J.-P.,
Le Cadre, E., Jaillard, B., and Plassard, C.: Acquisition of phosphorus and
other poorly mobile nutrients by roots. Where do plant nutrition models
fail?, Plant  Soil, 348, 29–61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0903-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-011-0903-y</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Hou et al.(2018)Hou, Chen, Luo, Zhou, Kuang, Zhang, Heenan, Lu, and
Wen</label><?label Hou:2018?><mixed-citation>Hou, E., Chen, C., Luo, Y., Zhou, G., Kuang, Y., Zhang, Y., Heenan, M., Lu, X.,   and Wen, D.: Effects of climate on soil phosphorus cycle and availability in
natural terrestrial ecosystems, Global Change Biol., 24, 3344–3356,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.14093</ext-link>,  2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Huang et al.(2018)Huang, Guenet, Ciais, Janssens, Soong, Wang, Goll,
Blagodatskaya, and Huang</label><?label Huang:2018?><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Guenet, B., Ciais, P., Janssens, I. A., Soong, J. L., Wang, Y., Goll, D., Blagodatskaya, E., and Huang, Y.: ORCHIMIC (v1.0), a microbe-mediated model for soil organic matter decomposition, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2111–2138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2111-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-2111-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Iversen et al.(2012)Iversen, Keller, Garten Jr., and
Norby</label><?label Iversen:2012?><mixed-citation>Iversen, C. M., Keller, J. K., Garten Jr., C. T., and Norby, R. J.: Soil carbon
and nitrogen cycling and storage throughout the soil profile in a sweetgum
plantation after 11 years of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-enrichment, Global Change Biol., 18,
1684–1697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02643.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02643.x</ext-link>,  2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Jackson et al.(1996)Jackson, Canadell, Ehleringer, Mooney, Sala, and
Schulze</label><?label Jackson:1996?><mixed-citation>Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E.,
and Schulze, E. D.: A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial
biomes, Oecologia, 108, 389–411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333714" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00333714</ext-link>,  1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Jonard et al.(2015)Jonard, Fürst, Verstraeten, Thimonier,
Timmermann, Potočić, Waldner, Benham, Hansen, Merilä, Ponette, de la Cruz,
Roskams, Nicolas, Croisé, Ingerslev, Matteucci, Decinti, Bascietto, and
Rautio</label><?label Jonard:2015?><mixed-citation>Jonard, M., Fürst, A., Verstraeten, A., Thimonier, A., Timmermann, V.,
Potočić, N., Waldner, P., Benham, S., <?pagebreak page801?>Hansen, K., Merilä, P., Ponette, Q.,
de la Cruz, A. C., Roskams, P., Nicolas, M., Croisé, L., Ingerslev, M.,
Matteucci, G., Decinti, B., Bascietto, M., and Rautio, P.: Tree mineral
nutrition is deteriorating in Europe, Global Change Biol., 21, 418–430,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12657" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12657</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Kavka and Polle(2016)</label><?label Kavka:2016?><mixed-citation>Kavka, M. and Polle, A.: Phosphate uptake kinetics and tissue-specific
transporter expression profiles in poplar (Populus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> canescens) at different
phosphorus availabilities, BMC Plant Biol., 16, 206,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0892-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s12870-016-0892-3</ext-link>,  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Koven et al.(2013)Koven, Riley, Subin, Tang, Torn, Collins, Bonan,
Lawrence, and Swenson</label><?label Koven:2013da?><mixed-citation>Koven, C. D., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J. Y., Torn, M. S., Collins, W. D., Bonan, G. B., Lawrence, D. M., and Swenson, S. C.: The effect of vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry and alternate soil C and N models on C dynamics of CLM4, Biogeosciences, 10, 7109–7131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Kuzyakov and Xu(2013)</label><?label Kuzyakov:2013?><mixed-citation>Kuzyakov, Y. and Xu, X.: Competition between roots and microorganisms for
nitrogen: mechanisms and ecological relevance, New Phytol., 198,
656–669, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.12235</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Lang et al.(2017)Lang, Krüger, Amelung, Willbold, Frossard,
Bünemann, Bauhus, Nitschke, Kandeler, Marhan, Schulz, Bergkemper, Schloter,
Luster, Guggisberg, Kaiser, Mikutta, Guggenberger, Polle, Pena, Prietzel,
Rodionov, Talkner, Meesenburg, von Wilpert, Hölscher, Dietrich, and
Chmara</label><?label Lang:2017?><mixed-citation>Lang, F., Krüger, J., Amelung, W., Willbold, S., Frossard, E., Bünemann,
E. K., Bauhus, J., Nitschke, R., Kandeler, E., Marhan, S., Schulz, S.,
Bergkemper, F., Schloter, M., Luster, J., Guggisberg, F., Kaiser, K.,
Mikutta, R., Guggenberger, G., Polle, A., Pena, R., Prietzel, J., Rodionov,
A., Talkner, U., Meesenburg, H., von Wilpert, K., Hölscher, A., Dietrich,
H. P., and Chmara, I.: Soil phosphorus supply controls P nutrition strategies
of beech forest ecosystems in Central Europe, Biogeochem., 136, 5–29,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0375-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-017-0375-0</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Lehmann and Kleber(2015)</label><?label Lehmann:2015?><mixed-citation>Lehmann, J. and Kleber, M.: The contentious nature of soil organic matter,
Nature, 528, 60–68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature16069</ext-link>,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Manzoni and Porporato(2009)</label><?label Manzoni:2009?><mixed-citation>Manzoni, S. and Porporato, A.: Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory
and models across scales, Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 1355–1379,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Manzoni et al.(2012)Manzoni, Taylor, Richter, Porporato, and
Agren</label><?label Manzoni:2012?><mixed-citation>Manzoni, S., Taylor, P., Richter, A., Porporato, A., and Agren, G. I.:
Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency
in soils, New Phytol., 196, 79–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04225.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04225.x</ext-link>,  2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Masclaux-Daubresse et al.(2010)Masclaux-Daubresse, Daniel-Vedele,
Dechorgnat, Chardon, Gaufichon, and Suzuki</label><?label Masclaux-Daubresse:2010?><mixed-citation>Masclaux-Daubresse, C., Daniel-Vedele, F., Dechorgnat, J., Chardon, F.,
Gaufichon, L., and Suzuki, A.: Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and
remobilization in plants: challenges for sustainable and productive
agriculture, Ann. Botany, 105, 1141–1157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/aob/mcq028</ext-link>,  2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>McCarthy et al.(2010)McCarthy, Oren, Johnsen, Gallet-Budynek,
Pritchard, Cook, LaDeau, Jackson, and Finzi</label><?label McCarthy:2010?><mixed-citation>McCarthy, H. R., Oren, R., Johnsen, K. H., Gallet-Budynek, A., Pritchard,
S. G., Cook, C. W., LaDeau, S. L., Jackson, R. B., and Finzi, A. C.:
Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment
site: interactions of atmospheric [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] with nitrogen and water availability
over stand development, New Phytol., 185, 514–528,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03078.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03078.x</ext-link>,  2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>McGuire et al.(2018)McGuire, Lawrence, Koven, Clein, Burke, Chen,
Jafarov, MacDougall, Marchenko, Nicolsky, Peng, Rinke, Ciais, Gouttevin,
Hayes, Ji, Krinner, Moore, Romanovsky, Schädel, Schaefer, Schuur, and
Zhuang</label><?label McGuire:2018?><mixed-citation>McGuire, A. D., Lawrence, D. M., Koven, C., Clein, J. S., Burke, E., Chen, G.,
Jafarov, E., MacDougall, A. H., Marchenko, S., Nicolsky, D., Peng, S., Rinke,
A., Ciais, P., Gouttevin, I., Hayes, D. J., Ji, D., Krinner, G., Moore,
J. C., Romanovsky, V., Schädel, C., Schaefer, K., Schuur, E. A. G., and
Zhuang, Q.: Dependence of the evolution of carbon dynamics in the northern
permafrost region on the trajectory of climate change, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 3882, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719903115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1719903115</ext-link>,  2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Medlyn et al.(2015)Medlyn, Zaehle, De Kauwe, Walker, Dietze, Hanson,
Hickler, Jain, Luo, Parton, Prentice, Thornton, Wang, Wang, Weng, Iversen,
McCarthy, Warren, Oren, and Norby</label><?label Medlyn:2015?><mixed-citation>Medlyn, B. E., Zaehle, S., De Kauwe, M. G., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C.,
Hanson, P. J., Hickler, T., Jain, A. K., Luo, Y., Parton, W., Prentice,
I. C., Thornton, P. E., Wang, S., Wang, Y.-P., Weng, E., Iversen, C. M.,
McCarthy, H. R., Warren, J. M., Oren, R., and Norby, R. J.: Using ecosystem
experiments to improve vegetation models, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 528,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2621</ext-link>,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Medlyn et al.(2016)Medlyn, De Kauwe, Zaehle, Walker, Duursma, Luus,
Mishurov, Pak, Smith, Wang, Yang, Crous, Drake, Gimeno, Macdonald, Norby,
Power, Tjoelker, and Ellsworth</label><?label Medlyn:2016?><mixed-citation>Medlyn, B. E., De Kauwe, M. G., Zaehle, S., Walker, A. P., Duursma, R. A.,
Luus, K., Mishurov, M., Pak, B., Smith, B., Wang, Y.-P., Yang, X., Crous,
K. Y., Drake, J. E., Gimeno, T. E., Macdonald, C. A., Norby, R. J., Power,
S. A., Tjoelker, M. G., and Ellsworth, D. S.: Using models to guide field
experiments: a priori predictions for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response of a nutrient- and
water-limited native Eucalypt woodland, Global Change Biol., 22,
2834–2851, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13268" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.13268</ext-link>,  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Mooshammer et al.(2014)Mooshammer, Wanek, Zechmeister-Boltenstern,
and Richter</label><?label Mooshammer:2014?><mixed-citation>Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., and Richter, A.:
Stoichiometric imbalances between terrestrial decomposer communities and
their resources: mechanisms and implications of microbial adaptations to
their resources, Front. Microbiol., 5,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2014.00022</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>MPI-MET(2019)</label><?label mpi2019?><mixed-citation>MPI-MET: Software-License-Agreement, available at: <uri>http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/models/license</uri>, last access: 14 November 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Olander and Vitousek(2000)</label><?label Olander:2000?><mixed-citation>Olander, L. P. and Vitousek, P. M.: Regulation of soil phosphatase and
chitinase activity by N and P availability, Biogeochem., 49, 175–190,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006316117817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1006316117817</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Parton et al.(1988)Parton, Stewart, and Cole</label><?label Parton:1988?><mixed-citation>Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B., and Cole, C. V.: Dynamics of C, N, P and S in   grassland soils: a model, Biogeochem., 5, 109–131,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180320" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02180320</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Rousk and Frey(2015)</label><?label Rousk:2015?><mixed-citation>Rousk, J. and Frey, S. D.: Revisiting the hypothesis that fungal-to-bacterial
dominance characterizes turnover of soil organic matter and nutrients,
Ecol. Monogr., 85, 457–472, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1796.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/14-1796.1</ext-link>,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Saltelli et al.(2000)Saltelli, Chan, and Scott</label><?label Saltelli:2000vn?><mixed-citation>
Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M.: Sensitivity Analysis, John Wiley
&amp; Sons, ltd., Chichester, New York, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Schimel and Weintraub(2003)</label><?label Schimel:2003?><mixed-citation>Schimel, J. P. and Weintraub, M. N.: The implications of exoenzyme activity on
microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: A theoretical model, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 35, 549–563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00015-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00015-4</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Schmidt et al.(2011)Schmidt, Torn, Abiven, Dittmar, Guggenberger,
Janssens, Kleber, Kögel-Knabner, Lehmann, Manning, Nannipieri, Rasse,
Weiner, and Trumbore</label><?label Schmidt:2011?><mixed-citation>Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G.,
Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D.
a. C., Nannipieri, P., Rasse, D. P., Weiner, S., and Trumbore, S. E.:
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property, Nature, 478,
49–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10386</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Sinsabaugh et al.(2008)Sinsabaugh, Lauber, Weintraub, Ahmed, Allison,
Crenshaw, Contosta, Cusack, Frey, Gallo, Gartner, Hobbie, Holland, Keeler,
Powers, Stursova, Takacs-Vesbach, Waldrop, Wallenstein, Zak, and
Zeglin</label><?label Sinsabaugh:2008?><mixed-citation>Sinsabaugh, R. L., Lauber, C. L., Weintraub, M. N., Ahmed, B., Allison, S. D.,
Crenshaw, C., Contosta, A. R., Cusack, D., Frey, S., Gallo, M. E., Gartner,
T. B., Hobbie, S. E., Holland, K., Keeler, B. L., Powers, J. S., Stursova,
M., Takacs-Vesbach, C., Waldrop, M. P., Wallenstein, M. D., Zak, D. R., and
Zeglin, L. H.: Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale, Ecol.
Lett., 11, 1252–1264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Smith et al.(2014)Smith, Wärlind, Arneth, Hickler, Leadley,
Siltberg, and Zaehle</label><?label Smith:2014?><mixed-citation>Smith, B., Wårlind, D., Arneth, A., Hickler, T., Leadley, P., Siltberg, J., and Zaehle, S.: Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary produc<?pagebreak page802?>tion in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model, Biogeosciences, 11, 2027–2054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Spohn et al.(2018)Spohn, Zavišić, Nassal, Bergkemper, Schulz,
Marhan, Schloter, Kandeler, and Polle</label><?label Spohn:2018?><mixed-citation>Spohn, M., Zavišić, A., Nassal, P., Bergkemper, F., Schulz, S., Marhan, S.,
Schloter, M., Kandeler, E., and Polle, A.: Temporal variations of phosphorus
uptake by soil microbial biomass and young beech trees in two forest soils
with contrasting phosphorus stocks, Soil Biol. Biochem., 117,
191–202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.019</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Sulman et al.(2014)Sulman, Phillips, Oishi, Shevliakova, and
Pacala</label><?label Sulman:2014?><mixed-citation>Sulman, B. N., Phillips, R. P., Oishi, A. C., Shevliakova, E., and Pacala,
S. W.: Microbe-driven turnover offsets mineral-mediated storage of soil
carbon under elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 1099,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2436" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2436</ext-link>,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Sulman et al.(2017)Sulman, Brzostek, Medici, Shevliakova, Menge, and
Phillips</label><?label Sulman:2017?><mixed-citation>Sulman, B. N., Brzostek, E. R., Medici, C., Shevliakova, E., Menge, D. N. L.,
and Phillips, R. P.: Feedbacks between plant N demand and rhizosphere priming
depend on type of mycorrhizal association, Ecol. Lett., 20, 1043–1053,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12802" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ele.12802</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Sulman et al.(2018)Sulman, Moore, Abramoff, Averill, Kivlin,
Georgiou, Sridhar, Hartman, Wang, Wieder, Bradford, Luo, Mayes, Morrison,
Riley, Salazar, Schimel, Tang, and Classen</label><?label Sulman:2018?><mixed-citation>Sulman, B. N., Moore, J. A. M., Abramoff, R., Averill, C., Kivlin, S.,
Georgiou, K., Sridhar, B., Hartman, M. D., Wang, G., Wieder, W. R., Bradford,
M. A., Luo, Y., Mayes, M. A., Morrison, E., Riley, W. J., Salazar, A.,
Schimel, J. P., Tang, J., and Classen, A. T.: Multiple models and experiments
underscore large uncertainty in soil carbon dynamics, Biogeochem., 141,
109–123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0509-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-018-0509-z</ext-link>,  2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Sulman et al.(2019)Sulman, Shevliakova, Brzostek, Kivlin, Malyshev,
Menge, and Zhang</label><?label Sulman:2019?><mixed-citation>Sulman, B. N., Shevliakova, E., Brzostek, E. R., Kivlin, S. N., Malyshev, S.,
Menge, D. N. L., and Zhang, X.: Diverse Mycorrhizal Associations Enhance
Terrestrial C Storage in a Global Model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 33,
501–523, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005973" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GB005973</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Tang and Riley(2014)</label><?label Tang:2014?><mixed-citation>Tang, J. and Riley, W. J.: Weaker soil carbon–climate feedbacks resulting
from microbial and abiotic interactions, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 56,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2438" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2438</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Tang and Riley(2013)</label><?label Tang:2013?><mixed-citation>Tang, J. Y. and Riley, W. J.: A total quasi-steady-state formulation of substrate uptake kinetics in complex networks and an example application to microbial litter decomposition, Biogeosciences, 10, 8329–8351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-8329-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-8329-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Thornton et al.(2007)Thornton, Lamarque, Rosenbloom, and
Mahowald</label><?label Thornton:2007?><mixed-citation>Thornton, P. E., Lamarque, J.-F., Rosenbloom, N. A., and Mahowald, N. M.:
Influence of carbon-nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fertilization and climate variability, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB4018,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002868</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Thum et al.(2019)Thum, Caldararu, Engel, Kern, Pallandt, Yu, and
Zaehle</label><?label Thum:2019mm?><mixed-citation>Thum, T., Caldararu, S., Engel, J., Kern, M., Pallandt, M., Schnur, R., Yu, L., and Zaehle, S.: A new model of the coupled carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles in the terrestrial biosphere (QUINCY v1.0; revision 1996), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4781–4802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Tipping et al.(2016)Tipping, Somerville, and Luster</label><?label Tipping:2016?><mixed-citation>Tipping, E., Somerville, C. J., and Luster, J.: The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stoichiometry of
soil organic matter, Biogeochem., 130, 117–131,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0247-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-016-0247-z</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Wang et al.(2014)Wang, Jagadamma, Mayes, Schadt, Megan Steinweg, Gu,
and Post</label><?label Wang:2014?><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Jagadamma, S., Mayes, M. A., Schadt, C. W., Megan Steinweg, J., Gu,
L., and Post, W. M.: Microbial dormancy improves development and experimental
validation of ecosystem model, The Isme J., 9, 226,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2014.120</ext-link>,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Wang et al.(2010)Wang, Law, and Pak</label><?label Wang:2010ba?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. P., Law, R. M., and Pak, B.: A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere, Biogeosciences, 7, 2261–2282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2261-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-2261-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Warren et al.(2011)Warren, Pötzelsberger, Wullschleger, Thornton,
Hasenauer, and Norby</label><?label Warren:2011?><mixed-citation>Warren, J. M., Pötzelsberger, E., Wullschleger, S. D., Thornton, P. E.,
Hasenauer, H., and Norby, R. J.: Ecohydrologic impact of reduced stomatal
conductance in forests exposed to elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ecohydrol., 4, 196–210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.173" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/eco.173</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Wieder et al.(2014)Wieder, Grandy, Kallenbach, and
Bonan</label><?label Wieder:2014?><mixed-citation>Wieder, W. R., Grandy, A. S., Kallenbach, C. M., and Bonan, G. B.: Integrating microbial physiology and physio-chemical principles in soils with the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model, Biogeosciences, 11, 3899–3917, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3899-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-3899-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>WRB(2015)</label><?label WRB:2015?><mixed-citation>
WRB, I. W. G.: World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015,
International soil classification system for naming soils and creating
legends for soil maps, Report, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Wutzler et al.(2017)Wutzler, Zaehle, Schrumpf, Ahrens, and
Reichstein</label><?label Wutzler:2017?><mixed-citation>Wutzler, T., Zaehle, S., Schrumpf, M., Ahrens, B., and Reichstein, M.:
Adaptation of microbial resource allocation affects modelled long term soil
organic matter and nutrient cycling, Soil Biol. Biochem., 115,
322–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.08.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.08.031</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Xu et al.(2013)Xu, Thornton, and Post</label><?label Xu:2013?><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Thornton, P. E., and Post, W. M.: A global analysis of soil microbial
biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems, Global
Ecol. Biogeogr., 22, 737–749, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/geb.12029</ext-link>,  2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Yang and Post(2011)</label><?label Yang:2011?><mixed-citation>Yang, X. and Post, W. M.: Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: A synthesis of soil phosphorus data using Hedley fractionation method, Biogeosciences, 8, 2907–2916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yang et~al.(2014{\natexlab{a}})Yang, Post, Thornton, and
Jain}}?><label>Yang et al.(2014a)Yang, Post, Thornton, and
Jain</label><?label Yang:2014a?><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Post, W. M., Thornton, P. E., and Jain, A. K.: Global Gridded Soil
Phosphorus Distribution Maps at 0.5-degree Resolution,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1223" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1223</ext-link>,
2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Yang et al.(2014b)Yang, Thornton, Ricciuto, and
Post</label><?label Yang:2014?><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Thornton, P. E., Ricciuto, D. M., and Post, W. M.: The role of phosphorus dynamics in tropical forests – a modeling study using CLM-CNP, Biogeosciences, 11, 1667–1681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1667-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-1667-2014</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Yu et al.(2018)Yu, Zanchi, Akselsson, Wallander, and
Belyazid</label><?label Yu:2018?><mixed-citation>Yu, L., Zanchi, G., Akselsson, C., Wallander, H., and Belyazid, S.: Modeling
the forest phosphorus nutrition in a southwestern Swedish forest site,
Ecol. Modell., 369, 88–100,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.018</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Yu et al.(2019)</label><?label yuetal2019?><mixed-citation>Yu, L., Zaehle, S., and Engel, J.: Jena Soil Model (JSM v1.0; revision 1934), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17871/quincy-model-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17871/quincy-model-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Zaehle and Friend(2010)</label><?label Zaehle:2010?><mixed-citation>Zaehle, S. and Friend, A. D.: Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O-CN
land surface model: 1. Model description, site-scale evaluation, and
sensitivity to parameter estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1005,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003521</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Zaehle et al.(2005)Zaehle, Sitch, Smith, and
Hatterman</label><?label Zaehle:2005ab?><mixed-citation>Zaehle, S., Sitch, S. A., Smith, B., and Hatterman, F.: Effects of parameter
uncertainties on the modeling of terrestrial biosphere dynamics, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB3020,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002395</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Zaehle et al.(2014)Zaehle, Medlyn, De Kauwe, Walker, Dietze, Hickler,
Luo, Wang, El-Masri, Thornton, Jain, Wang, Warlind, Weng, Parton, Iversen,
Gallet-Budynek, McCarthy, Finzi, Hanson, Prentice, Oren, and
Norby</label><?label Zaehle:2014?><mixed-citation>Zaehle, S., Medlyn, B. E., De Kauwe, M. G., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C.,
Hickler, T., Luo, Y., Wang, Y.-P., El-Masri, B., Thornton, P., Jain, A.,
Wang, S., Warlind, D., Weng, E., Parton, W., Iversen, C. M., Gallet-Budynek,
A., McCarthy, H., Finzi, A., Hanson, P. J., Prentice, I. C., Oren, R., and
Norby, R. J.: Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models
against observations from two temperate Free-Air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Enrichment studies, New
Phytol., 202, 803–822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.12697</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Zaehle(2019)</label><?label zaehle2019?><mixed-citation>Zaehle, S., Thum, T., Caldararu, S., Engel, J., Kern, M., Pallandt, M., Schnur, R., and Yu, L.: Fair-use policy for the QUINCY model, ava<?pagebreak page803?>ilable at: <uri>https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgi/index.php/Projects/QUINCYModel</uri>, last access: 14 November 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Zederer et al.(2017)Zederer, Talkner, Spohn, and
Joergensen</label><?label Zederer:2017?><mixed-citation>Zederer, D. P., Talkner, U., Spohn, M., and Joergensen, R. G.: Microbial
biomass phosphorus and C/N/P stoichiometry in forest floor and A horizons as   affected by tree species, Soil Biol. Biochem., 111, 166–175,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.009</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Zhu et al.(2016)Zhu, Riley, Tang, and Koven</label><?label Zhu:2016?><mixed-citation>Zhu, Q., Riley, W. J., Tang, J., and Koven, C. D.: Multiple soil nutrient competition between plants, microbes, and mineral surfaces: model development, parameterization, and example applications in several tropical forests, Biogeosciences, 13, 341–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-341-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-341-2016</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Zhu et al.(2017)Zhu, Riley, and Tang</label><?label Zhu:2017?><mixed-citation>Zhu, Q., Riley, W. J., and Tang, J.: A new theory of plant–microbe nutrient
competition resolves inconsistencies between observations and model
predictions, Ecol. Appl., 27, 875–886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1490" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/eap.1490</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Zhu et al.(2019)Zhu, Riley, Tang, Collier, Hoffman, Yang, and
Bisht</label><?label Zhu:2019?><mixed-citation>Zhu, Q., Riley, W. J., Tang, J., Collier, N., Hoffman, F. M., Yang, X., and
Bisht, G.: Representing Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Carbon Interactions in the   E3SM Land Model: Development and Global Benchmarking, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Syst., 11, 2238–2258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001571" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018MS001571</ext-link>,  2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Jena Soil Model (JSM v1.0; revision 1934): a microbial soil organic carbon model integrated with nitrogen and phosphorus processes</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Plant–soil interactions, such as the coupling of plants' below-ground biomass allocation with soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition, nutrient release and plant uptake, are essential to understand the response of carbon (C) cycling to global changes. However, these processes are poorly represented in the current terrestrial biosphere models owing to the simple first-order approach of SOM cycling and the ignorance of variations within a soil profile. While the emerging microbially explicit soil organic C models can better describe C formation and turnover, at present, they lack a full coupling to the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles with the soil profile. Here we present a new SOM model – the Jena Soil Model (JSM) – which is microbially explicit, vertically resolved and integrated with the N and P cycles. To account for the effects of nutrient availability and litter quality on decomposition, JSM includes the representation of enzyme allocation to different depolymerisation sources based on the microbial adaptation approach as well as of nutrient acquisition competition based on the equilibrium chemistry approximation approach. Herein, we present the model structure and basic features of model performance in a beech forest in Germany. The model reproduced the main SOM stocks and microbial biomass as well as their vertical patterns in the soil profile. We further tested the sensitivity of the model to parameterisation and showed that JSM is generally sensitive to changes in microbial stoichiometry and processes.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Abramoff et al.(2017)Abramoff, Davidson, and Finzi</label><mixed-citation>
Abramoff, R. Z., Davidson, E. A., and Finzi, A. C.: A parsimonious modular
approach to building a mechanistic belowground carbon and nitrogen model,
J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci., 122, 2418–2434,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003796" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003796</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Ahrens et al.(2015)Ahrens, Braakhekke, Guggenberger, Schrumpf, and
Reichstein</label><mixed-citation>
Ahrens, B., Braakhekke, M. C., Guggenberger, G., Schrumpf, M., and Reichstein,
M.: Contribution of sorption, DOC transport and microbial interactions to the
14C age of a soil organic carbon profile: Insights from a calibrated process
model, Soil Biol. Biochem., 88, 390–402,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.008</a>,  2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Ahrens et al.(2020)Ahrens, Reichstein, Guggenberger, and
Schrumpf</label><mixed-citation>
Ahrens, B., Reichstein, M., Guggenberger, G., and Schrumpf, M.: Towards
reconciling radiocarbon and carbon in soils: the importance of modelling
organo-mineral associations, Soil Biol. Biogeochem., under review, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Allison and Vitousek(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Allison, S. D. and Vitousek, P. M.: Responses of extracellular enzymes to
simple and complex nutrient inputs, Soil Biol. Biochem., 37,
937–944, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Arora et al.(2013)Arora, Boer, Friedlingstein, Eby, Jones, Christian,
Bonan, Bopp, Brovkin, Cadule, Hajima, Ilyina, Lindsay, Tjiputra, and
Wu</label><mixed-citation>
Arora, V. K., Boer, G. J., Friedlingstein, P., Eby, M., Jones, C. D.,
Christian, J. R., Bonan, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Hajima, T.,
Ilyina, T., Lindsay, K., Tjiputra, J. F., and Wu, T.: Carbon–Concentration
and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models, J.
Climate, 26, 5289–5314, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00494.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00494.1</a>,  2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bergkemper et al.(2016)Bergkemper, Bunemann, Hauenstein, Heuck,
Kandeler, Kruger, Marhan, Meszaros, Nassal, Nassal, Oelmann, Pistocchi,
Schloter, Spohn, Talkner, Zederer, and Schulz</label><mixed-citation>
Bergkemper, F., Bunemann, E. K., Hauenstein, S., Heuck, C., Kandeler, E.,
Kruger, J., Marhan, S., Meszaros, E., Nassal, D., Nassal, P., Oelmann, Y.,
Pistocchi, C., Schloter, M., Spohn, M., Talkner, U., Zederer, D. P., and
Schulz, S.: An inter-laboratory comparison of gaseous and liquid fumigation
based methods for measuring microbial phosphorus (Pmic) in forest soils with
differing P stocks, J. Microbiol. Methods, 128, 66–68,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.006</a>,  2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bloor et al.(2009)Bloor, Niboyet, Leadley, and Barthes</label><mixed-citation>
Bloor, J. M. G., Niboyet, A., Leadley, P. W., and Barthes, L.: CO<sub>2</sub> and
inorganic N supply modify competition for N between co-occurring grass
plants, tree seedlings and soil microorganisms, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 41, 544–552,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.013</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bond-Lamberty et al.(2018)Bond-Lamberty, Bailey, Chen, Gough, and
Vargas</label><mixed-citation>
Bond-Lamberty, B., Bailey, V. L., Chen, M., Gough, C. M., and Vargas, R.:
Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades, Nature,
560, 80–83, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0358-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0358-x</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bradford et al.(2016)Bradford, Wieder, Bonan, Fierer, Raymond, and
Crowther</label><mixed-citation>
Bradford, M. A., Wieder, W. R., Bonan, G. B., Fierer, N., Raymond, P. A., and
Crowther, T. W.: Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate
change, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 751, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3071</a>,  2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bünemann et al.(2016)Bünemann, Augstburger, and
Frossard</label><mixed-citation>
Bünemann, E. K., Augstburger, S., and Frossard, E.: Dominance of either
physicochemical or biological phosphorus cycling processes in temperate
forest soils of contrasting phosphate availability, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 101, 85–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Ciais et al.(2013)Ciais, Sabine, Bala, Bopp, Brovkin, Canadell,
Chhabra, DeFries, Galloway, Heimann, Jones, Quéré, Myneni, Piao, and
Thornton</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J., Chhabra,
A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Quéré, C. L.,
Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and Other Biogeochemical
Cycles, pp. 465–570, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
and New York, NY, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.015</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Craine et al.(2007)Craine, Morrow, and Fierer</label><mixed-citation>
Craine, J. M., Morrow, C., and Fierer, N.: Microbial nitrogen limitation
increases decomposition, Ecology, 88, 2105–2113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1847.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1847.1</a>,  2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Craine et al.(2018)Craine, Elmore, Wang, Aranibar, Bauters, Boeckx,
Crowley, Dawes, Delzon, Fajardo, Fang, Fujiyoshi, Gray, Guerrieri, Gundale,
Hawke, Hietz, Jonard, Kearsley, Kenzo, Makarov, Marañón-Jiménez, McGlynn,
McNeil, Mosher, Nelson, Peri, Roggy, Sanders-DeMott, Song, Szpak, Templer,
Van der Colff, Werner, Xu, Yang, Yu, and Zmudczyńska-Skarbek</label><mixed-citation>
Craine, J. M., Elmore, A. J., Wang, L., Aranibar, J., Bauters, M., Boeckx, P.,
Crowley, B. E., Dawes, M. A., Delzon, S., Fajardo, A., Fang, Y., Fujiyoshi,
L., Gray, A., Guerrieri, R., Gundale, M. J., Hawke, D. J., Hietz, P., Jonard,
M., Kearsley, E., Kenzo, T., Makarov, M., Marañón-Jiménez, S., McGlynn,
T. P., McNeil, B. E., Mosher, S. G., Nelson, D. M., Peri, P. L., Roggy,
J. C., Sanders-DeMott, R., Song, M., Szpak, P., Templer, P. H., Van der
Colff, D., Werner, C., Xu, X., Yang, Y., Yu, G., and Zmudczyńska-Skarbek,
K.: Isotopic evidence for oligotrophication of terrestrial ecosystems, Nat.
Ecol. Evolut., 2, 1735–1744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0694-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0694-0</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Dannenmann et al.(2016)Dannenmann, Bimüller, Gschwendtner,
Leberecht, Tejedor, Bilela, Gasche, Hanewinkel, Baltensweiler,
Kögel-Knabner, Polle, Schloter, Simon, and Rennenberg</label><mixed-citation>
Dannenmann, M., Bimüller, C., Gschwendtner, S., Leberecht, M., Tejedor, J.,
Bilela, S., Gasche, R., Hanewinkel, M., Baltensweiler, A., Kögel-Knabner,
I., Polle, A., Schloter, M., Simon, J., and Rennenberg, H.: Climate Change
Impairs Nitrogen Cycling in European Beech Forests, PLOS ONE, 11, e0158823,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158823" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158823</a>,  2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Drake et al.(2011)Drake, Gallet-Budynek, Hofmockel, Bernhardt,
Billings, Jackson, Johnsen, Lichter, McCarthy, McCormack, Moore, Oren,
Palmroth, Phillips, Pippen, Pritchard, Treseder, Schlesinger, DeLucia, and
Finzi</label><mixed-citation>
Drake, J. E., Gallet-Budynek, A., Hofmockel, K. S., Bernhardt, E. S., Billings,
S. A., Jackson, R. B., Johnsen, K. S., Lichter, J., McCarthy, H. R.,
McCormack, M. L., Moore, D. J. P., Oren, R., Palmroth, S., Phillips, R. P.,
Pippen, J. S., Pritchard, S. G., Treseder, K. K., Schlesinger, W. H.,
DeLucia, E. H., and Finzi, A. C.: Increases in the flux of carbon belowground
stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest
productivity under elevated CO<sub>2</sub>, Ecol. Lett., 14, 349–357,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01593.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01593.x</a>,  2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Ellsworth et al.(2017)Ellsworth, Anderson, Crous, Cooke, Drake,
Gherlenda, Gimeno, Macdonald, Medlyn, Powell, Tjoelker, and
Reich</label><mixed-citation>
Ellsworth, D., Anderson, I., Crous, K., Cooke, J., Drake, J., Gherlenda, A.,
Gimeno, T., Macdonald, C., Medlyn, B., Powell, J., Tjoelker, M., and Reich,
P.: Elevated CO<sub>2</sub> does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a
low-phosphorus soil, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 279–282,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3235</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Federer et al.(1993)Federer, Turcotte, and Smith</label><mixed-citation>
Federer, C. A., Turcotte, D. E., and Smith, C. T.: The organic fraction–bulk
density relationship and the expression of nutrient content in forest soils,
Can. J. Forest Res., 23, 1026–1032, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-131</a>,  1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fleischer et al.(2019)Fleischer, Rammig, De Kauwe, Walker, Domingues,
Fuchslueger, Garcia, Goll, Grandis, Jiang, Haverd, Hofhansl, Holm, Kruijt,
Leung, Medlyn, Mercado, Norby, Pak, von Randow, Quesada, Schaap,
Valverde-Barrantes, Wang, Yang, Zaehle, Zhu, and Lapola</label><mixed-citation>
Fleischer, K., Rammig, A., De Kauwe, M. G., Walker, A. P., Domingues, T. F.,
Fuchslueger, L., Garcia, S., Goll, D. S., Grandis, A., Jiang, M., Haverd, V.,
Hofhansl, F., Holm, J. A., Kruijt, B., Leung, F., Medlyn, B. E., Mercado,
L. M., Norby, R. J., Pak, B., von Randow, C., Quesada, C. A., Schaap, K. J.,
Valverde-Barrantes, O. J., Wang, Y.-P., Yang, X., Zaehle, S., Zhu, Q., and
Lapola, D. M.: Amazon forest response to CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization dependent on plant
phosphorus acquisition, Nat. Geosci., 12, 736–741,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0404-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0404-9</a>,  2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fujita et al.(2017)Fujita, Kunito, Moro, Toda, Otsuka, and
Nagaoka</label><mixed-citation>
Fujita, K., Kunito, T., Moro, H., Toda, H., Otsuka, S., and Nagaoka, K.:
Microbial resource allocation for phosphatase synthesis reflects the
availability of inorganic phosphorus across various soils, Biogeochem.,
136, 325–339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0398-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0398-6</a>,  2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Goll et al.(2017)Goll, Vuichard, Maignan, Jornet-Puig, Sardans,
Violette, Peng, Sun, Kvakic, Guimberteau, Guenet, Zaehle, Penuelas, Janssens,
and Ciais</label><mixed-citation>
Goll, D. S., Vuichard, N., Maignan, F., Jornet-Puig, A., Sardans, J., Violette, A., Peng, S., Sun, Y., Kvakic, M., Guimberteau, M., Guenet, B., Zaehle, S., Penuelas, J., Janssens, I., and Ciais, P.: A representation of the phosphorus cycle for ORCHIDEE (revision 4520), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3745–3770, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3745-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3745-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hinsinger et al.(2011)Hinsinger, Brauman, Devau, Gérard, Jourdan,
Laclau, Le Cadre, Jaillard, and Plassard</label><mixed-citation>
Hinsinger, P., Brauman, A., Devau, N., Gérard, F., Jourdan, C., Laclau, J.-P.,
Le Cadre, E., Jaillard, B., and Plassard, C.: Acquisition of phosphorus and
other poorly mobile nutrients by roots. Where do plant nutrition models
fail?, Plant  Soil, 348, 29–61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0903-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0903-y</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Hou et al.(2018)Hou, Chen, Luo, Zhou, Kuang, Zhang, Heenan, Lu, and
Wen</label><mixed-citation>
Hou, E., Chen, C., Luo, Y., Zhou, G., Kuang, Y., Zhang, Y., Heenan, M., Lu, X.,   and Wen, D.: Effects of climate on soil phosphorus cycle and availability in
natural terrestrial ecosystems, Global Change Biol., 24, 3344–3356,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14093</a>,  2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Huang et al.(2018)Huang, Guenet, Ciais, Janssens, Soong, Wang, Goll,
Blagodatskaya, and Huang</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y., Guenet, B., Ciais, P., Janssens, I. A., Soong, J. L., Wang, Y., Goll, D., Blagodatskaya, E., and Huang, Y.: ORCHIMIC (v1.0), a microbe-mediated model for soil organic matter decomposition, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2111–2138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2111-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2111-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Iversen et al.(2012)Iversen, Keller, Garten Jr., and
Norby</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, C. M., Keller, J. K., Garten Jr., C. T., and Norby, R. J.: Soil carbon
and nitrogen cycling and storage throughout the soil profile in a sweetgum
plantation after 11 years of CO<sub>2</sub>-enrichment, Global Change Biol., 18,
1684–1697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02643.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02643.x</a>,  2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Jackson et al.(1996)Jackson, Canadell, Ehleringer, Mooney, Sala, and
Schulze</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E.,
and Schulze, E. D.: A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial
biomes, Oecologia, 108, 389–411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333714" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333714</a>,  1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Jonard et al.(2015)Jonard, Fürst, Verstraeten, Thimonier,
Timmermann, Potočić, Waldner, Benham, Hansen, Merilä, Ponette, de la Cruz,
Roskams, Nicolas, Croisé, Ingerslev, Matteucci, Decinti, Bascietto, and
Rautio</label><mixed-citation>
Jonard, M., Fürst, A., Verstraeten, A., Thimonier, A., Timmermann, V.,
Potočić, N., Waldner, P., Benham, S., Hansen, K., Merilä, P., Ponette, Q.,
de la Cruz, A. C., Roskams, P., Nicolas, M., Croisé, L., Ingerslev, M.,
Matteucci, G., Decinti, B., Bascietto, M., and Rautio, P.: Tree mineral
nutrition is deteriorating in Europe, Global Change Biol., 21, 418–430,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12657" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12657</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kavka and Polle(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kavka, M. and Polle, A.: Phosphate uptake kinetics and tissue-specific
transporter expression profiles in poplar (Populus  ×  canescens) at different
phosphorus availabilities, BMC Plant Biol., 16, 206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0892-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0892-3</a>,  2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Koven et al.(2013)Koven, Riley, Subin, Tang, Torn, Collins, Bonan,
Lawrence, and Swenson</label><mixed-citation>
Koven, C. D., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J. Y., Torn, M. S., Collins, W. D., Bonan, G. B., Lawrence, D. M., and Swenson, S. C.: The effect of vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry and alternate soil C and N models on C dynamics of CLM4, Biogeosciences, 10, 7109–7131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Kuzyakov and Xu(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Kuzyakov, Y. and Xu, X.: Competition between roots and microorganisms for
nitrogen: mechanisms and ecological relevance, New Phytol., 198,
656–669, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12235</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Lang et al.(2017)Lang, Krüger, Amelung, Willbold, Frossard,
Bünemann, Bauhus, Nitschke, Kandeler, Marhan, Schulz, Bergkemper, Schloter,
Luster, Guggisberg, Kaiser, Mikutta, Guggenberger, Polle, Pena, Prietzel,
Rodionov, Talkner, Meesenburg, von Wilpert, Hölscher, Dietrich, and
Chmara</label><mixed-citation>
Lang, F., Krüger, J., Amelung, W., Willbold, S., Frossard, E., Bünemann,
E. K., Bauhus, J., Nitschke, R., Kandeler, E., Marhan, S., Schulz, S.,
Bergkemper, F., Schloter, M., Luster, J., Guggisberg, F., Kaiser, K.,
Mikutta, R., Guggenberger, G., Polle, A., Pena, R., Prietzel, J., Rodionov,
A., Talkner, U., Meesenburg, H., von Wilpert, K., Hölscher, A., Dietrich,
H. P., and Chmara, I.: Soil phosphorus supply controls P nutrition strategies
of beech forest ecosystems in Central Europe, Biogeochem., 136, 5–29,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0375-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0375-0</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Lehmann and Kleber(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Lehmann, J. and Kleber, M.: The contentious nature of soil organic matter,
Nature, 528, 60–68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069</a>,  2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Manzoni and Porporato(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Manzoni, S. and Porporato, A.: Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory
and models across scales, Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 1355–1379,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Manzoni et al.(2012)Manzoni, Taylor, Richter, Porporato, and
Agren</label><mixed-citation>
Manzoni, S., Taylor, P., Richter, A., Porporato, A., and Agren, G. I.:
Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency
in soils, New Phytol., 196, 79–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04225.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04225.x</a>,  2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Masclaux-Daubresse et al.(2010)Masclaux-Daubresse, Daniel-Vedele,
Dechorgnat, Chardon, Gaufichon, and Suzuki</label><mixed-citation>
Masclaux-Daubresse, C., Daniel-Vedele, F., Dechorgnat, J., Chardon, F.,
Gaufichon, L., and Suzuki, A.: Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and
remobilization in plants: challenges for sustainable and productive
agriculture, Ann. Botany, 105, 1141–1157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq028</a>,  2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>McCarthy et al.(2010)McCarthy, Oren, Johnsen, Gallet-Budynek,
Pritchard, Cook, LaDeau, Jackson, and Finzi</label><mixed-citation>
McCarthy, H. R., Oren, R., Johnsen, K. H., Gallet-Budynek, A., Pritchard,
S. G., Cook, C. W., LaDeau, S. L., Jackson, R. B., and Finzi, A. C.:
Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment
site: interactions of atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>] with nitrogen and water availability
over stand development, New Phytol., 185, 514–528,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03078.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03078.x</a>,  2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>McGuire et al.(2018)McGuire, Lawrence, Koven, Clein, Burke, Chen,
Jafarov, MacDougall, Marchenko, Nicolsky, Peng, Rinke, Ciais, Gouttevin,
Hayes, Ji, Krinner, Moore, Romanovsky, Schädel, Schaefer, Schuur, and
Zhuang</label><mixed-citation>
McGuire, A. D., Lawrence, D. M., Koven, C., Clein, J. S., Burke, E., Chen, G.,
Jafarov, E., MacDougall, A. H., Marchenko, S., Nicolsky, D., Peng, S., Rinke,
A., Ciais, P., Gouttevin, I., Hayes, D. J., Ji, D., Krinner, G., Moore,
J. C., Romanovsky, V., Schädel, C., Schaefer, K., Schuur, E. A. G., and
Zhuang, Q.: Dependence of the evolution of carbon dynamics in the northern
permafrost region on the trajectory of climate change, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 3882, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719903115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719903115</a>,  2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Medlyn et al.(2015)Medlyn, Zaehle, De Kauwe, Walker, Dietze, Hanson,
Hickler, Jain, Luo, Parton, Prentice, Thornton, Wang, Wang, Weng, Iversen,
McCarthy, Warren, Oren, and Norby</label><mixed-citation>
Medlyn, B. E., Zaehle, S., De Kauwe, M. G., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C.,
Hanson, P. J., Hickler, T., Jain, A. K., Luo, Y., Parton, W., Prentice,
I. C., Thornton, P. E., Wang, S., Wang, Y.-P., Weng, E., Iversen, C. M.,
McCarthy, H. R., Warren, J. M., Oren, R., and Norby, R. J.: Using ecosystem
experiments to improve vegetation models, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 528,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2621" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2621</a>,  2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Medlyn et al.(2016)Medlyn, De Kauwe, Zaehle, Walker, Duursma, Luus,
Mishurov, Pak, Smith, Wang, Yang, Crous, Drake, Gimeno, Macdonald, Norby,
Power, Tjoelker, and Ellsworth</label><mixed-citation>
Medlyn, B. E., De Kauwe, M. G., Zaehle, S., Walker, A. P., Duursma, R. A.,
Luus, K., Mishurov, M., Pak, B., Smith, B., Wang, Y.-P., Yang, X., Crous,
K. Y., Drake, J. E., Gimeno, T. E., Macdonald, C. A., Norby, R. J., Power,
S. A., Tjoelker, M. G., and Ellsworth, D. S.: Using models to guide field
experiments: a priori predictions for the CO<sub>2</sub> response of a nutrient- and
water-limited native Eucalypt woodland, Global Change Biol., 22,
2834–2851, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13268" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13268</a>,  2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Mooshammer et al.(2014)Mooshammer, Wanek, Zechmeister-Boltenstern,
and Richter</label><mixed-citation>
Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., and Richter, A.:
Stoichiometric imbalances between terrestrial decomposer communities and
their resources: mechanisms and implications of microbial adaptations to
their resources, Front. Microbiol., 5,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00022</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>MPI-MET(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
MPI-MET: Software-License-Agreement, available at: <a href="http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/models/license" target="_blank"/>, last access: 14 November 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Olander and Vitousek(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Olander, L. P. and Vitousek, P. M.: Regulation of soil phosphatase and
chitinase activity by N and P availability, Biogeochem., 49, 175–190,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006316117817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006316117817</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Parton et al.(1988)Parton, Stewart, and Cole</label><mixed-citation>
Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B., and Cole, C. V.: Dynamics of C, N, P and S in   grassland soils: a model, Biogeochem., 5, 109–131,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180320" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180320</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Rousk and Frey(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Rousk, J. and Frey, S. D.: Revisiting the hypothesis that fungal-to-bacterial
dominance characterizes turnover of soil organic matter and nutrients,
Ecol. Monogr., 85, 457–472, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1796.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1796.1</a>,  2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Saltelli et al.(2000)Saltelli, Chan, and Scott</label><mixed-citation>
Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M.: Sensitivity Analysis, John Wiley
&amp; Sons, ltd., Chichester, New York, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Schimel and Weintraub(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Schimel, J. P. and Weintraub, M. N.: The implications of exoenzyme activity on
microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: A theoretical model, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 35, 549–563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00015-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00015-4</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Schmidt et al.(2011)Schmidt, Torn, Abiven, Dittmar, Guggenberger,
Janssens, Kleber, Kögel-Knabner, Lehmann, Manning, Nannipieri, Rasse,
Weiner, and Trumbore</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G.,
Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D.
a. C., Nannipieri, P., Rasse, D. P., Weiner, S., and Trumbore, S. E.:
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property, Nature, 478,
49–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10386</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Sinsabaugh et al.(2008)Sinsabaugh, Lauber, Weintraub, Ahmed, Allison,
Crenshaw, Contosta, Cusack, Frey, Gallo, Gartner, Hobbie, Holland, Keeler,
Powers, Stursova, Takacs-Vesbach, Waldrop, Wallenstein, Zak, and
Zeglin</label><mixed-citation>
Sinsabaugh, R. L., Lauber, C. L., Weintraub, M. N., Ahmed, B., Allison, S. D.,
Crenshaw, C., Contosta, A. R., Cusack, D., Frey, S., Gallo, M. E., Gartner,
T. B., Hobbie, S. E., Holland, K., Keeler, B. L., Powers, J. S., Stursova,
M., Takacs-Vesbach, C., Waldrop, M. P., Wallenstein, M. D., Zak, D. R., and
Zeglin, L. H.: Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale, Ecol.
Lett., 11, 1252–1264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Smith et al.(2014)Smith, Wärlind, Arneth, Hickler, Leadley,
Siltberg, and Zaehle</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, B., Wårlind, D., Arneth, A., Hickler, T., Leadley, P., Siltberg, J., and Zaehle, S.: Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model, Biogeosciences, 11, 2027–2054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Spohn et al.(2018)Spohn, Zavišić, Nassal, Bergkemper, Schulz,
Marhan, Schloter, Kandeler, and Polle</label><mixed-citation>
Spohn, M., Zavišić, A., Nassal, P., Bergkemper, F., Schulz, S., Marhan, S.,
Schloter, M., Kandeler, E., and Polle, A.: Temporal variations of phosphorus
uptake by soil microbial biomass and young beech trees in two forest soils
with contrasting phosphorus stocks, Soil Biol. Biochem., 117,
191–202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.019</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Sulman et al.(2014)Sulman, Phillips, Oishi, Shevliakova, and
Pacala</label><mixed-citation>
Sulman, B. N., Phillips, R. P., Oishi, A. C., Shevliakova, E., and Pacala,
S. W.: Microbe-driven turnover offsets mineral-mediated storage of soil
carbon under elevated CO<sub>2</sub>, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 1099,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2436" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2436</a>,  2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Sulman et al.(2017)Sulman, Brzostek, Medici, Shevliakova, Menge, and
Phillips</label><mixed-citation>
Sulman, B. N., Brzostek, E. R., Medici, C., Shevliakova, E., Menge, D. N. L.,
and Phillips, R. P.: Feedbacks between plant N demand and rhizosphere priming
depend on type of mycorrhizal association, Ecol. Lett., 20, 1043–1053,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12802" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12802</a>,  2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Sulman et al.(2018)Sulman, Moore, Abramoff, Averill, Kivlin,
Georgiou, Sridhar, Hartman, Wang, Wieder, Bradford, Luo, Mayes, Morrison,
Riley, Salazar, Schimel, Tang, and Classen</label><mixed-citation>
Sulman, B. N., Moore, J. A. M., Abramoff, R., Averill, C., Kivlin, S.,
Georgiou, K., Sridhar, B., Hartman, M. D., Wang, G., Wieder, W. R., Bradford,
M. A., Luo, Y., Mayes, M. A., Morrison, E., Riley, W. J., Salazar, A.,
Schimel, J. P., Tang, J., and Classen, A. T.: Multiple models and experiments
underscore large uncertainty in soil carbon dynamics, Biogeochem., 141,
109–123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0509-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0509-z</a>,  2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Sulman et al.(2019)Sulman, Shevliakova, Brzostek, Kivlin, Malyshev,
Menge, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Sulman, B. N., Shevliakova, E., Brzostek, E. R., Kivlin, S. N., Malyshev, S.,
Menge, D. N. L., and Zhang, X.: Diverse Mycorrhizal Associations Enhance
Terrestrial C Storage in a Global Model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 33,
501–523, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005973" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005973</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Tang and Riley(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, J. and Riley, W. J.: Weaker soil carbon–climate feedbacks resulting
from microbial and abiotic interactions, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 56,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2438" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2438</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Tang and Riley(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, J. Y. and Riley, W. J.: A total quasi-steady-state formulation of substrate uptake kinetics in complex networks and an example application to microbial litter decomposition, Biogeosciences, 10, 8329–8351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-8329-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-8329-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Thornton et al.(2007)Thornton, Lamarque, Rosenbloom, and
Mahowald</label><mixed-citation>
Thornton, P. E., Lamarque, J.-F., Rosenbloom, N. A., and Mahowald, N. M.:
Influence of carbon-nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO<sub>2</sub>
fertilization and climate variability, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB4018,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002868</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Thum et al.(2019)Thum, Caldararu, Engel, Kern, Pallandt, Yu, and
Zaehle</label><mixed-citation>
Thum, T., Caldararu, S., Engel, J., Kern, M., Pallandt, M., Schnur, R., Yu, L., and Zaehle, S.: A new model of the coupled carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles in the terrestrial biosphere (QUINCY v1.0; revision 1996), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4781–4802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Tipping et al.(2016)Tipping, Somerville, and Luster</label><mixed-citation>
Tipping, E., Somerville, C. J., and Luster, J.: The C : N : P : S stoichiometry of
soil organic matter, Biogeochem., 130, 117–131,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0247-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0247-z</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Wang et al.(2014)Wang, Jagadamma, Mayes, Schadt, Megan Steinweg, Gu,
and Post</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Jagadamma, S., Mayes, M. A., Schadt, C. W., Megan Steinweg, J., Gu,
L., and Post, W. M.: Microbial dormancy improves development and experimental
validation of ecosystem model, The Isme J., 9, 226,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.120</a>,  2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Wang et al.(2010)Wang, Law, and Pak</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y. P., Law, R. M., and Pak, B.: A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere, Biogeosciences, 7, 2261–2282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2261-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2261-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Warren et al.(2011)Warren, Pötzelsberger, Wullschleger, Thornton,
Hasenauer, and Norby</label><mixed-citation>
Warren, J. M., Pötzelsberger, E., Wullschleger, S. D., Thornton, P. E.,
Hasenauer, H., and Norby, R. J.: Ecohydrologic impact of reduced stomatal
conductance in forests exposed to elevated CO<sub>2</sub>, Ecohydrol., 4, 196–210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.173" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.173</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Wieder et al.(2014)Wieder, Grandy, Kallenbach, and
Bonan</label><mixed-citation>
Wieder, W. R., Grandy, A. S., Kallenbach, C. M., and Bonan, G. B.: Integrating microbial physiology and physio-chemical principles in soils with the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model, Biogeosciences, 11, 3899–3917, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3899-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3899-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>WRB(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
WRB, I. W. G.: World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015,
International soil classification system for naming soils and creating
legends for soil maps, Report, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Wutzler et al.(2017)Wutzler, Zaehle, Schrumpf, Ahrens, and
Reichstein</label><mixed-citation>
Wutzler, T., Zaehle, S., Schrumpf, M., Ahrens, B., and Reichstein, M.:
Adaptation of microbial resource allocation affects modelled long term soil
organic matter and nutrient cycling, Soil Biol. Biochem., 115,
322–336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.08.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.08.031</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Xu et al.(2013)Xu, Thornton, and Post</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, X., Thornton, P. E., and Post, W. M.: A global analysis of soil microbial
biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems, Global
Ecol. Biogeogr., 22, 737–749, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12029</a>,  2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Yang and Post(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, X. and Post, W. M.: Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: A synthesis of soil phosphorus data using Hedley fractionation method, Biogeosciences, 8, 2907–2916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Yang et al.(2014a)Yang, Post, Thornton, and
Jain</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, X., Post, W. M., Thornton, P. E., and Jain, A. K.: Global Gridded Soil
Phosphorus Distribution Maps at 0.5-degree Resolution,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1223" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1223</a>,
2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Yang et al.(2014b)Yang, Thornton, Ricciuto, and
Post</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, X., Thornton, P. E., Ricciuto, D. M., and Post, W. M.: The role of phosphorus dynamics in tropical forests – a modeling study using CLM-CNP, Biogeosciences, 11, 1667–1681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1667-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1667-2014</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Yu et al.(2018)Yu, Zanchi, Akselsson, Wallander, and
Belyazid</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, L., Zanchi, G., Akselsson, C., Wallander, H., and Belyazid, S.: Modeling
the forest phosphorus nutrition in a southwestern Swedish forest site,
Ecol. Modell., 369, 88–100,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.018</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Yu et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, L., Zaehle, S., and Engel, J.: Jena Soil Model (JSM v1.0; revision 1934), <a href="https://doi.org/10.17871/quincy-model-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17871/quincy-model-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Zaehle and Friend(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Zaehle, S. and Friend, A. D.: Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O-CN
land surface model: 1. Model description, site-scale evaluation, and
sensitivity to parameter estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1005,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003521</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Zaehle et al.(2005)Zaehle, Sitch, Smith, and
Hatterman</label><mixed-citation>
Zaehle, S., Sitch, S. A., Smith, B., and Hatterman, F.: Effects of parameter
uncertainties on the modeling of terrestrial biosphere dynamics, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB3020,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002395</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Zaehle et al.(2014)Zaehle, Medlyn, De Kauwe, Walker, Dietze, Hickler,
Luo, Wang, El-Masri, Thornton, Jain, Wang, Warlind, Weng, Parton, Iversen,
Gallet-Budynek, McCarthy, Finzi, Hanson, Prentice, Oren, and
Norby</label><mixed-citation>
Zaehle, S., Medlyn, B. E., De Kauwe, M. G., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C.,
Hickler, T., Luo, Y., Wang, Y.-P., El-Masri, B., Thornton, P., Jain, A.,
Wang, S., Warlind, D., Weng, E., Parton, W., Iversen, C. M., Gallet-Budynek,
A., McCarthy, H., Finzi, A., Hanson, P. J., Prentice, I. C., Oren, R., and
Norby, R. J.: Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models
against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO<sub>2</sub> Enrichment studies, New
Phytol., 202, 803–822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12697</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Zaehle(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Zaehle, S., Thum, T., Caldararu, S., Engel, J., Kern, M., Pallandt, M., Schnur, R., and Yu, L.: Fair-use policy for the QUINCY model, available at: <a href="https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/bgi/index.php/Projects/QUINCYModel" target="_blank"/>, last access: 14 November 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Zederer et al.(2017)Zederer, Talkner, Spohn, and
Joergensen</label><mixed-citation>
Zederer, D. P., Talkner, U., Spohn, M., and Joergensen, R. G.: Microbial
biomass phosphorus and C/N/P stoichiometry in forest floor and A horizons as   affected by tree species, Soil Biol. Biochem., 111, 166–175,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.009</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Zhu et al.(2016)Zhu, Riley, Tang, and Koven</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Q., Riley, W. J., Tang, J., and Koven, C. D.: Multiple soil nutrient competition between plants, microbes, and mineral surfaces: model development, parameterization, and example applications in several tropical forests, Biogeosciences, 13, 341–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-341-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-341-2016</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Zhu et al.(2017)Zhu, Riley, and Tang</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Q., Riley, W. J., and Tang, J.: A new theory of plant–microbe nutrient
competition resolves inconsistencies between observations and model
predictions, Ecol. Appl., 27, 875–886, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1490" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1490</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Zhu et al.(2019)Zhu, Riley, Tang, Collier, Hoffman, Yang, and
Bisht</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Q., Riley, W. J., Tang, J., Collier, N., Hoffman, F. M., Yang, X., and
Bisht, G.: Representing Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Carbon Interactions in the   E3SM Land Model: Development and Global Benchmarking, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Syst., 11, 2238–2258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001571" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001571</a>,  2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
