<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-12-5291-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Ground subsidence effects on simulating dynamic high-latitude surface
inundation under permafrost thaw using CLM5</article-title><alt-title>Simulating ground subsidence effects</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Simulating ground subsidence effects}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Ekici et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Ekici</surname><given-names>Altug</given-names></name>
          <email>ekici@climate.unibe.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5526-4949</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Hanna</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2003-4377</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Lawrence</surname><given-names>David M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-3023</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Swenson</surname><given-names>Sean C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Prigent</surname><given-names>Catherine</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Climate and Environmental Physics, Physics Institute, University of
Bern, Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research,
University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR 8112, 75014, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Altug Ekici (ekici@climate.unibe.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>5291</fpage><lpage>5300</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Altug Ekici et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e144">Simulating surface inundation is particularly challenging
for the high-latitude permafrost regions. Ice-rich permafrost thaw can
create expanding thermokarst lakes as well as shrinking large wetlands. Such
processes can have major biogeochemical implications and feedbacks to the
climate system by altering the pathways and rates of permafrost carbon
release. However, the processes associated with it have not yet been
properly represented in Earth system models. We show a new model
parameterization that allows direct representation of surface water dynamics
in CLM (Community Land Model), the land surface model of several Earth
System Models. Specifically, we coupled permafrost-thaw-induced ground
subsidence and surface microtopography distribution to represent surface
water dynamics in the high latitudes. Our results show increased surface
water fractions around western Siberian plains and northeastern territories
of Canada. Additionally, localized drainage events correspond well to severe
ground subsidence events. Our parameterization is one of the first steps
towards a process-oriented representation of surface hydrology, which is
crucial to assess the biogeochemical feedbacks between land and the
atmosphere under changing climate.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e156">Northern high latitudes experience pronounced warming due to Arctic
amplification (Serreze and Francis, 2006). Within the last decades,  temperature increase in the Arctic has been twice the amount of that in the
tropics (Solomon et al., 2007). The abrupt increase in Arctic temperatures
threatens to destabilize the global permafrost areas and can alter land
surface structures, which can lead to releasing considerable amounts of
permafrost carbon as greenhouse gases to the climate system (Schuur et al.,
2008). Similarly, increased precipitation can accelerate the release of
permafrost carbon in high latitudes (Chang et al., 2019; Grant et al.,
2017). The balance between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release from permafrost
depends largely on the organic matter decomposition pathway; larger
inundated areas release more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the anaerobic
pathway but overall release of greenhouse gases is greater under aerobic
conditions (Lee et al., 2014; Treat et al., 2015). However, for a future model
estimate, Knoblauch et al. (2018) predicts twice as much permafrost carbon
release in anoxic conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">241</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">138</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kgC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
compared to oxic conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">113</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kgC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) by 2100.
The main natural sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are from tropical wetlands; however, the contributions from high-latitude wetlands are increasing each
decade (Saunois et al., 2016) with further thawing of permafrost.</p>
      <p id="d1e285">With a high percentage of surface wetland coverage (Grosse et al., 2013;
Muster et al., 2017), characterizing high-latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
requires detailed process representations in models. Besides surface wetland
conditions, models should also properly estimate permafrost thaw stage
(Malhotra and Roulet, 2015), changing surface topography (Olefeldt et al.,
2013), and surface vegetation and microbial conditions (Grant et al., 2017)
in order to improve estimations of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. However,
Earth system models<?pagebreak page5292?> (ESMs) used in the future climate projections struggle
to represent the complex physical or hydrological changes in the permafrost-covered high-latitude regions. Therefore, it is necessary to improve model
representation of surface hydrology processes within the ESMs.</p>
      <p id="d1e310">Permafrost processes have now been represented commonly within the land
surface models (Lawrence et al., 2008; Gouttevin et al., 2012; Ekici et al.,
2014; Chadburn et al., 2015); however, the complex hydrological feedbacks
between degrading permafrost and thermokarst lake formations have been a
major challenge. An extensive review of wetland modeling activities and an
intercomparison effort of evaluating methane-modeling approaches are given
in Wania et al. (2013) and Melton et al. (2013). These studies, however, do
not include permafrost-specific features such as excess ice in frozen soils; therefore, they have tendency to under-represent key processes associated to
permafrost thaw. Excess ice melt within the frozen soils can lead to abrupt
changes in the surface topography, creating subsided ground levels, which
can enhance pond formation often recognized as thermokarst formation. Such
changes in surface microtopography can be very effective in altering the
soil thermal and hydrological conditions (Zona et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e313">Lee et al. (2014) implemented surface subsidence processes in the Community
Land Model (CLM: Oleson et al., 2013; Lawrence et al., 2011; Swenson et al.,
2012) to overcome some of the limitations in representing processes
associated with permafrost thaw and subsequent land surface subsidence. The
surface conditions altered by the subsidence events change the
microtopography of the area, which can further modify the surface
hydrological conditions in reality. Lee et al. (2014) did not further couple
the land surface subsidence with hydrological processes to represent
subsequent changes in local hydrology created under permafrost thawing. Here
we developed a conceptual coupling of excess ice melting and subsequent land
surface subsidence with hydrology and show how implementing permafrost-thaw-induced subsidence affects surface microtopography distribution and surface
inundation in the CLM model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e324">Simulating the effects of permafrost thaw on surface water dynamics requires
a complex interaction of thermodynamics and hydrology within the model. Here
we use the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial resolution simulations of CLM5 (Lawrence et
al., 2019) to represent such dynamics. CLM is a complex, process-based
terrestrial ecosystem model simulating biogeophysical and biogeochemical
processes within the soil and vegetation level. Lee et al. (2014) have
presented the excess ice implementation into CLM. The ground excess ice data
from <italic>International Circum-Arctic Map of Permafrost and Ground-Ice Conditions</italic> (Brown et al., 1997) are used to create an initial soil ice dataset to be
prescribed into the model. This excess ice is added between 0.8 and 3.8 m in CLM soil scheme where permafrost exists and increases the relevant
soil layer thicknesses. The amount of excess ice for each grid cell is
estimated by multiplying percent permafrost area with the amount of excess ice
from the Brown et al. (1997) dataset. The soil physical parameters (heat
capacity and conductivity) are updated with the addition of excess ice. The
excess ice in the model undergoes physical phase change but most importantly
melting ice allows a first-order estimation of land surface subsidence under
permafrost thaw. First the soil ice is allowed to melt and then the excess
ice is subjected to phase change. Ice meltwater is then added the soil
hydrology scheme in CLM and can be directed as runoff if it exceeds
saturation. The soil layer thicknesses are then updated with the
disappearing amount of excess ice. Lee et al.'s (2014) scheme does not allow the formation of excess ice after initialization.</p>
      <p id="d1e341">In CLM, surface-inundated fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of each grid cell is calculated by
using the microtopography distribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the surface
water level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the grid cell (Eqs. 1–3). Surface water is defined by a
spatial scale elevation variation that is the microtopography. The
microtopography is normally distributed around the grid cell mean elevation.
The fractional area of the grid cell that is inundated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be calculated
with the standard deviation of this microtopographic distribution. The
surface-inundated fraction, in turn, affects the soil heat, water, or carbon
fluxes with the atmosphere.
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M19" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">erf</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        is the parameterization of surface-inundated fraction “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” using an error
function of surface water level “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” (height in meters relative to the grid cell
mean elevation) and microtopography distribution “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” (m).
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M23" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        is the microtopography distribution “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” as a function of
slope, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the prescribed topographic slope and “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” is
an adjustable parameter.
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        is the adjustable coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of maximum
topographical distribution “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>”. The original value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 0.4, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e606">This parameterization is similar to the TOPMODEL approach (Beven and Kirkby,
1979), where a hypsometric function is used to define the height of standing
water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) within the grid box by assuming a normal statistical distribution of
ground-level microtopography. In this study, the subsidence levels from
permafrost-thaw-induced excess ice melt are coupled with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in order to represent the naturally<?pagebreak page5293?> occurring subsided landscapes within the
permafrost-affected areas. With increasing excess ice melt, more subsidence
occurs and the amount of subsidence redefines the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is inversely related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 1). Therefore, to
represent increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has to be decreased in value.
However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the statistical distribution of surface
microtopography and hence cannot be directly related to physical subsidence
levels. Therefore, a conceptual method of relating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to an-order-of-magnitude-lower ground subsidence levels is used. (Eq. 4). This
first step of conceptualization can be improved with subgrid-scale
parameterization (Aas et al., 2019) in future studies.
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M41" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="" open="{"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        New microsigma parameterization “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” where
“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” is the accumulated subsidence in meters and “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” is the adjustable
parameter set to 10.</p>
      <p id="d1e797">We implemented a conditional formulation regarding the severity of
subsidence. In general, the surface is forced to allow more ponding of water
with moderate levels of subsidence. However, advance levels of excess ice
melt can degrade the surface levels so much that the small troughs created
from the initial degradation can connect to create a drainage system that
the grid box can no longer support any ponding (Liljedahl et al., 2016). For
this reason, the excess ice melt has a reversed effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after a threshold value of 0.5 m (Eq. 4). The choice of this
threshold value is discussed in the following section.</p>
      <p id="d1e812">We performed several experiments using CLM5 to assess the general response
of surface hydrology to changing microsigma parameter values. First, the
dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is investigated by doubling
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (experiment: Sigma-2) and reducing it by half
(experiment: Sigma-0.5). Afterwards, initialized with the default <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution (Fig. S1), the results of the new <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
parameterization (experiment: Exice) are compared to the default model
version (experiment: Control), where subsidence does not alter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and to a satellite-driven data product (GIEMS, the Global
Inundation Extent from Multiple Satellites; Prigent et al., 2012). All
experiments include 155-year transient simulations following a spin-up
procedure of repeating 1901–1930 climate forcing for 100 years. The
transient 155-year simulation represents the time period from 1860 till
2015. CRUNCEP (Viovy, 2009), a combined dataset of Climate Research Unit
(CRU) and National Center for Environmental Protection (NCEP) reanalysis
datasets, is used as the atmospheric forcing for these experiments.</p>
      <p id="d1e903">The GIEMS surface inundation dataset from Prigent et al. (2007, 2012) is
used to compare the simulated inundated fractions. GIEMS uses a combination
of satellite observations to derive the distribution and dynamics of the
global surface water extent. The inundated areas are calculated using
passive microwave observations from Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I),
active microwave observations from the scatterometer on board the European
Remote Sensing (ERS) satellite, and the normalized difference vegetation
index (NDVI) from the Advanced Very High resolution Radiometer (AVHRR). The
dataset provides monthly-mean values of surface water area from 1993 to
2007, with a spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dataset is
spatially projected onto a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution grid for comparison with
the model results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e936">In our experiments, surface inundation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) increases where surface
microtopography distribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decreases (Fig. 1) as
expected from the CLM parameterization. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases
(Sigma-0.5) compared to the original value (shown in Supplement  Fig. S1), it results in very high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over western Siberia and Hudson Bay area,
while increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sigma-2) results in lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in general. In the original CLM parameterization, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated with
a static microtopography index (Fig. S1) derived from a prescribed
topographic slope dataset (Oleson et al., 2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1039">High-latitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N) maps of simulated
surface water fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the Control, Sigma-0.5, and Sigma-2.0
experiments with different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions averaged for the
period 2000–2010.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1089">Our results illustrate the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and how a certain range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values can result in very high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be quite regional (Fig. S2). This relation
emphasizes the need for a dynamic circum-Arctic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value to
capture the natural variability of surface conditions when representing
permafrost-thaw-associated hydrological changes. In the Exice experiment,
coupling excess ice-melt-induced ground subsidence to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
leads to significant changes in surface hydrology (Fig. 2). In our
simulations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistently lower in Exice compared to
Control at the end of the 20th century (Fig. 2a). This is the model
representation of increased variability in surface microtopography due to
uneven subsidence events within the grid cell. Particularly larger inundated
fractions are simulated around western Siberia and northeast Canada, which
conform well to the observational datasets of peatland distribution
(Tarnocai et al., 2007, 2009). Several other observational estimates agree
on the spatial distribution of high-latitude peatlands, where most of the
wetland formations are expected in the future (Melton et al., 2013).
Therefore, the new parameterization of surface-inundated fraction is a
stepping stone towards a more realistic representation of surface hydrology
in permafrost-affected areas. Other modeling studies support these results
with similar spatial patterns of surface wetland distributions (Wania et
al., 2013; Melton et al., 2013). In the previous version of CLM, a simulated
inundated area shows slightly different patterns (Riley et al., 2011),
mainly due to non-process-based description of inundated fractions. We
emphasize that although our parameterization is only conceptual, this is the
first attempt towards coupling permafrost-thaw-associated land<?pagebreak page5294?> surface
subsidence with hydrological changes in a land surface model within an ESM.</p>
      <p id="d1e1197">By introducing the effects of ground subsidence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a
dynamic inundated fraction is calculated. However, there is no observed
dataset to evaluate the relation between subsidence and ground topography; therefore, an assumption had to be made regarding this coupling. In this
study, changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are proportional to the changes in
ground subsidence with the difference in an order of magnitude. This
assumption is put to test by doubling and halving the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and the results show 10 % to 20 % change in surface-inundated fractions (Fig. 1). The difference in dynamic parameterization
(Fig. 2b) stays in between these values and on average shows a 10 %–15 %
increase, thus supporting the coupling assumption.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1235">Effects of coupled subsidence-microsigma parameterization on
“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” and “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N difference
maps of the Exice–Control experiments for the period 2000–2010.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1289">As expected, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes are related to the
ground subsidence processes in most cases. Exice experiment produces land
surface subsidence in some grid cells (Fig. 3) similar to the spatial
patterns exhibited in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 2, suggesting that
melting of excess ice affects changes in surface hydrology. This is most
pronounced around western Siberia, south of Hudson Bay, and around
northwestern Canada and central Alaska, where initial excess ice was large
(Lee et al., 2014). Simulated ground subsidence is associated to changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> described in Fig. 2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1364">High-latitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N) map of ground
subsidence simulated from the Exice experiment averaged for the period
2000–2010.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1386">As a result of subsidence threshold parameterization (see Methods), the reversed
effect of excess ice melting is shown in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plots (Fig. 2a), where red points are directly related to the severe ground subsidence
locations (Fig. 3). These areas consistently exhibit the abrupt melting of
excess ice leading to increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Larger negative
deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the original values were observed in
central Alaska, northwestern Canada, south of Hudson Bay, southwest Russia,
central Siberia, and the northern Yakutia regions of Russia (areas with dark
blue in Fig. 2a). In reality, different landscapes should have a different
threshold value, yet our work is aimed to capture the overall changes and
general patterns rather than local conditions, so a preliminary choice of a
single threshold value is used. Same areas show increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to
Control (Fig. 2b). The largest increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed in central
Siberia and southeastern Russia, while some minor decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
are present in an unevenly distributed pattern. It is important to add that
the choice of a 0.5 m threshold is arbitrary and can be modified according to
the surface dataset of excess ice.</p>
      <p id="d1e1472">Spatially averaged time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show that in
the Exice experiment <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases over time and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a more dynamic change during the simulation (Fig. 4). The
discrepancy in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between Exice and Control in the
beginning of the simulation is due to prior excess ice melting during the
spin-up period (Fig. S3) and the values continue to decrease throughout the
20th century, while the decrease halts temporarily during 1960–1990
(microsigma–diff plot in Fig. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1542">Time series of spatially averaged high-latitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and annual maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variables from
Exice and Control experiments together with the time series of the Exice–Control
difference (diff) for the period 1900–2010.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1591">Model results show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is quite sensitive to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
parameter. With the current knowledge, there is no perfect way to optimize
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter for each grid box in global simulations; this is why we tried to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by coupling to other
well-known physical processes like excess ice melt. Since there is no global
dataset to directly compare it with our model results, one should be cautious when interpreting our model's contemporary and future estimates. One avenue to
constrain our parameterization will be to use the terrestrial greenhouse gas
fluxes in future studies.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5295?><p id="d1e1643">Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed in the Exice experiment; however, the differences
between Exice and Control show a general increase throughout the simulation
except in the period between 1960 and 1990. The spatially averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
exhibit a nonlinear progression during the 20th century (Fig. 4).
It is mainly the change in climate forcing that contributes to this trend. Analyzing
the CRUNCEP atmospheric forcing data suggests that the precipitation pattern
over the experiment domain shows a sudden reduction at the beginning of
1960s (Fig. S4). Even though the average precipitation starts increasing
again, the lower values contribute to the reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Similar
changes occur with the patterns in atmospheric temperature (Fig. S4), which
is a direct forcing for permafrost thaw and ground subsidence. A
process-based representation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> allows the model to naturally represent
the temporal changes in climate. Hence, our representation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will
improve the estimation of future surface hydrological states under changing
climatic conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e1726">The direct effects of the new model parameterization are better analyzed, while inspecting point-scale changes as shown in Fig. 5. The three selected
points show a range of scenarios to observe the effects of subsidence on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Point 1 has no change in subsidence during the
simulation and with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in Exice (due to prior
subsidence in spin-up), the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the Control simulation
is always positive, meaning higher surface-inundated fractions. In Point 2,
Exice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases due to the increase in subsidence during
the simulation. These gradual changes are reflected in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where sudden
increases are shown around 1935 and 1955, exactly when the subsidence
changes occur. Similarly in Point 3, subsidence causes a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the beginning of the simulation; however the subsidence
values surpass the 0.5 m threshold around 1920s, which causes the reversed
effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by increasing it compared to the Control
experiment. Severe subsidence causing more drainage is represented in this
way within our parameterization. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values show this drainage with a
sudden decrease at 1920 and continuing with mostly negative values
throughout the simulation. These scenarios support the validity of our<?pagebreak page5296?> new
parameterization that can be used for any future climate scenario for a
better representation of surface hydrology and subsidence coupling.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1852">Time series of subsidence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">micro</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variables
from the Exice and Control experiments at three selected sites. Point 1: 54<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 272<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; Point 2: 64<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; Point 3: 65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1943">The GIEMS dataset (Prigent et al., 2012) provides the surface area of wetlands
for each grid box. The fraction of wetland-covered grid box is calculated to
compare it with the model results (Fig. 6). The range of estimated surface
wetland fraction is different in the satellite dataset and model outputs;
however, the spatial distribution of surface-inundated area is fairly comparable
between the model and the satellite dataset. They both exhibit larger
inundated fractions in western Siberia and around Hudson Bay. The ranges of
estimated surface wetland fraction between the satellite dataset and model
outputs are different due to differences in the definitions of inundated
areas. However, spatial distribution of surface-inundated area is comparable
between the model and the satellite dataset, where both exhibit larger
inundated fractions in western Siberia and Hudson Bay. Since our model
provides the fraction of grid box that is inundated, the satellite dataset
had to be converted from actual wetland area to fractions. The GIEMS dataset
assumes 773 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid boxes all over the globe (Prigent et al., 2007),
which creates grid-size problems compared to model grid box area. Another
issue with such a comparison stems from the differences in the definition of
inundated fraction. The GIEMS dataset uses satellite observations at different
wavelengths to derive the wetland area, while the CLM creates the surface
inundation with the topography index and water inputs to the grid box. Within
the model parameterization, the height of the surface water level is
calculated by a hypsometric function and the grid box fraction is further
derived from the grid size. This allows an ever-existing surface-inundated
fraction even in very dry grid boxes, whereas the GIEMS method underestimates
the small wetlands comprising less than 10 % of the grid box area (Prigent
et al., 2007); hence a model overestimation of satellite dataset is
expected. Definition of modeled and satellite-derived inundated fraction is
not the same. Unfortunately there is no standard definition (Reichhardt,
1995), which produces the struggle to find a proper observational dataset to
evaluate model results. What we emphasize from our findings is,
nevertheless, the spatial patterns of higher inundated fractions occurring
at similar locations in model and satellite dataset (Fig. 6).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1957">Surface water fraction comparison from high-latitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N) maps of annual maximum surface wetlands from the GIEMS dataset
(Prigent et al., 2012) and annual maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">osfc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the Exice and Control
experiments for the period 1993–2007.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/5291/2019/gmd-12-5291-2019-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2003">A warming climate affects the Arctic more severely than the rest of the
globe. Increasing surface temperatures pose an important threat to the
vulnerable high-latitude ecosystems. The degradation of Arctic permafrost due to
increased soil temperatures leads to the release of permafrost carbon to the
atmosphere and further strengthens the greenhouse warming (IPCC, 2013;
Schuur et al., 2008). For future climate predictions, it is necessary to
properly simulate the Arctic surface-inundated areas due to their physical
and biogeochemical coupling with the atmosphere.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5298?><p id="d1e2006">This study summarizes a new parameterization within the CLM to represent
prognostic surface-inundated fractions under permafrost thawing using a
conceptual approach that can lead to the implementation of a physical
process-based parameterization. Coupling ground subsidence to surface
microtopography distribution and hence allowing a natural link between surface
hydrological conditions and soil thermodynamics resulted in generally
increased surface-inundated fractions over the northern high latitudes, with
larger surface-inundated fractions around western and far-east Siberian
plains and northeastern Canada. Projected increase in global temperatures
will inevitably cause more excess ice melting and subsequent ground
subsidence; therefore, it will be necessary to incorporate a process-based
parameterization to accurately account for future ground subsidence effects
on surface hydrological states.</p>
      <p id="d1e2009">Our results confirm the enhancements of coupling ground subsidence and
surface inundation to represent the temporal changes in surface hydrology
reflected by soil physical states and the atmospheric forcing, which is much
needed for a future scenario experiment. Here we conclude that our new
parameterization is implemented successfully and functions globally for the
CLM model in that the inundated areas exist in the same areas as the
observational data. It can be used for future climate scenarios such as
shown in Lee et al. (2014) with major subsidence events during the 21st
century under a high warming scenario.</p>
      <p id="d1e2012">This new parameterization represents the first step towards a process-based
representation of such hydrological processes in CLM. Using this
parameterization, further work can proceed to investigate the biogeochemical
feedbacks of permafrost greenhouse gas fluxes between land and atmosphere.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2020">The code modifications to the CLM model in accordance with this paper are
accessible through the Zenodo archive with the following link:
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2652181" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.2652181</ext-link> (Ekici, 2019).</p>

      <p id="d1e2026">The overall CLM model code can be obtained from the NCAR archives; the
instructions on accessing the model code are given through this website:
<uri>http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/land/</uri> (NCAR CESM2 archives, 2019, last access: 10 October 2019.).</p>

      <p id="d1e2032">The full set of model data will be made publicly available through the
Norwegian Research Data Archive at <uri>https://archive.norstore.no</uri> (last access: 10 October 2019) upon
publication.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2038">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5291-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-5291-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2047">AE and HL designed the experiments and AE carried them out. DML and SCS
developed the main CLM model code and HL developed the previous version this
model is based on. CP provided the GIEMS dataset. AE performed the
simulations and prepared the paper with contributions from all
co-authors.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2054">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2060">The simulations were
performed on resources provided by UNINETT Sigma2-the National
Infrastructure for High Performance Computing and Data Storage in Norway,
accounts NS2345K and NN2345K.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2065">This research has been supported by the Research Council of Norway projects PERMANOR (255331) and MOCABORS (255061) and NSF EaSM-L02170157.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2071">This paper was edited by Min-Hui Lo and reviewed by four anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aas, K. S., Martin, L., Nitzbon, J., Langer, M., Boike, J., Lee, H., Berntsen, T. K., and Westermann, S.: Thaw processes in ice-rich permafrost landscapes represented with laterally coupled tiles in a land surface model, The Cryosphere, 13, 591–609, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-591-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-591-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beven, K. and Kirkby, M.: A physically based, variable contributing area
model of basin hydrology, Hydrol. Sci. B., 24, 43–69, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brown, J., Ferrians  Jr., O. J., Heginbottom, J. A., and Melnikov, E. S.:
Circum-Arctic Map of Permafrost and Ground-Ice Conditions version 2,
Boulder, CO: National Snow and Ice Data Center, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chadburn, S., Burke, E., Essery, R., Boike, J., Langer, M., Heikenfeld, M., Cox, P., and Friedlingstein, P.: An improved representation of physical permafrost dynamics in the JULES land-surface model, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1493–1508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1493-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-1493-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chang, K.-Y., Riley, W. J., Crill, P. M., Grant, R. F., Rich, V. I., and Saleska, S. R.: Large carbon cycle sensitivities to climate across a permafrost thaw gradient in subarctic Sweden, The Cryosphere, 13, 647–663, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-647-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-647-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ekici, A.: altugekici/clm_microsigma: first release (Version v1.0.0), Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2652181" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.2652181</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ekici, A., Beer, C., Hagemann, S., Boike, J., Langer, M., and Hauck, C.: Simulating high-latitude permafrost regions by the JSBACH terrestrial ecosystem model, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 631–647, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-631-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-631-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gouttevin, I., Krinner, G., Ciais, P., Polcher, J., and Legout, C.: Multi-scale validation of a new soil freezing scheme for a land-surface model with physically-based hydrology, The Cryosphere, 6, 407–430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-407-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-6-407-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grant, R. F., Mekonnen, Z. A., Riley, W. J., Arora, B., and Torn, M. S.:
Mathematical Modelling of Arctic Polygonal Tundra with Ecosys: 2.
Microtopography Determines How <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Exchange Responds to Changes in
Temperature and Precipitation, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 3174–3187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JG004037</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5299?><ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grosse, G., Jones, B., and  Arp, C.: Thermokarst Lakes, Drainage, and Drained
Basins, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, edited by:  Stocker, T. F.,  Qin, D.,  Plattner, G.-K.,  Tignor, M.,
Allen, S. K., Boschung, J.,  Nauels, A.,  Xia, Y.,  Bex, V.,  and  Midgley, P. M.,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
1535 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knoblauch, C., Beer, C., Liebner, S., Grigoriev, M. N., and Pfeiffer, E. M.:
Methane production as key to the greenhouse gas budget of thawing
permafrost, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 309–312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0095-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-018-0095-z</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Slater, A. G., Romanovsky, V. E., and Nicolsky, D. J.:
Sensitivity of a model projection of near-surface permafrost degradation to
soil column depth and representation of soil organic matter, J. Geophys.
Res., 113, 1–14, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S.
C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z. L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., and
Bonan, G. B.: Parameterization improvements and functional and structural
advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 3, M03001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011MS00045</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Oleson, K. W., Swenson, S. C.,
Bonan, G., Collier, N., Ghimire, B., van Kampenhout, L., Kennedy, D., and
Kluzek, E.: The Community Land Model version 5: Description of new features,
benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018MS001583</ext-link>, online first, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, H., Swenson, S. C., Slater, A. G., and Lawrence, D. M.: Effects of
excess ground ice on projections of permafrost in a warming
climate, Environ. Res. Lett., 9 124006, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/12/124006" ext-link-type="DOI">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/12/124006</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liljedahl, A. K., Boike, J., Daanen, R. P., Fedorov, A. N., Frost, G. V.,
Grosse, G., Hinzman, L. D., Iijma, Y., Jorgenson, J. C., Matveyeva, N., and
Necsoiu, M.: Pan-Arctic ice-wedge degradation in warming permafrost and its
influence on tundra hydrology, Nat. Geosci., 9, 312–318, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Malhotra, A. and Roulet, N. T.: Environmental correlates of peatland carbon fluxes in a thawing landscape: do transitional thaw stages matter?, Biogeosciences, 12, 3119–3130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3119-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-3119-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Melton, J. R., Wania, R., Hodson, E. L., Poulter, B., Ringeval, B., Spahni, R., Bohn, T., Avis, C. A., Beerling, D. J., Chen, G., Eliseev, A. V., Denisov, S. N., Hopcroft, P. O., Lettenmaier, D. P., Riley, W. J., Singarayer, J. S., Subin, Z. M., Tian, H., Zürcher, S., Brovkin, V., van Bodegom, P. M., Kleinen, T., Yu, Z. C., and Kaplan, J. O.: Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP), Biogeosciences, 10, 753–788, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-753-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-753-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Muster, S., Roth, K., Langer, M., Lange, S., Cresto Aleina, F., Bartsch, A., Morgenstern, A., Grosse, G., Jones, B., Sannel, A. B. K., Sjöberg, Y., Günther, F., Andresen, C., Veremeeva, A., Lindgren, P. R., Bouchard, F., Lara, M. J., Fortier, D., Charbonneau, S., Virtanen, T. A., Hugelius, G., Palmtag, J., Siewert, M. B., Riley, W. J., Koven, C. D., and Boike, J.: PeRL: a circum-Arctic Permafrost Region Pond and Lake database, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 317–348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-317-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-317-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>NCAR CESM2 archives: <uri>http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/land</uri>, last access: 10 October 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Olefeldt, D., Turetsky, M. R., Crill, P. M., and Mcguire, A. D.:
Environmental and physical controls on northern terrestrial methane
emissions across permafrost zones, Glob. Change Biol., 19, 589–603,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12071</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Bonan, G. B., Drewniak, B., Huang, M.,
Koven, C. D., Levis, S., Li, F., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Swenson, S. C.,
Thornton, P. E., Bozbiyik, A., Fisher, R., Kluzek, E., Lamarque, J. -F.,
Lawrence, P. J., Leung, L. R., Lipscomb, W., Muszala, S., Ricciuto, D. M.,
Sacks, W., Sun, Y., Tang, J., and Yang, Z.-L: Technical Description of
version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM), Ncar Technical Note
NCAR/TN-503<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO,
422 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RR1W7M" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6RR1W7M</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prigent, C., Papa, F., Aires, F., Rossow, W. B., and Matthews, E.: Global
inundation dynamics inferred from multiple satellite observations,
1993–2000, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 112, D12107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007847" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007847</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prigent, C., Papa, F., Aires, F., Jimenez, C., Rossow, W. B., and Matthews,
E.: Changes in land surface water dynamics since the 1990s and relation to
population pressure, Geophys. Res. Let., 39, L08403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL051276</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reichhardt, T.: Academy under fire on “wetlands” definition, Nature, 375, 171–171, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Lawrence, D. M., Swenson, S. C., Torn, M. S., Meng, L., Mahowald, N. M., and Hess, P.: Barriers to predicting changes in global terrestrial methane fluxes: analyses using CLM4Me, a methane biogeochemistry model integrated in CESM, Biogeosciences, 8, 1925–1953, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1925-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-1925-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Brovkin, V., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P., Covey, K., Curry, C., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., Marshall, J., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Pison, I., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Santini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, P., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R., Wiedinmyer, C., Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: The global methane budget 2000–2012, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 697–751, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-697-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schuur, E. A., Bockheim, J., Canadell, J. G., Euskirchen, E., Field, C. B.,
Goryachkin, S. V., Hagemann, S., Kuhry, P., Lafleur, P. M., Lee, H., and
Mazhitova, G.: Vulnerability of permafros<?pagebreak page5300?>t carbon to climate change:
Implications for the global carbon cycle, AIBS Bulletin, 58, 701–714,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Serreze, M. C. and Francis, J. A.: The Arctic amplification debate, Climatic
Change, 76, 241–264, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Averyt, K., and Marquis, M. (Eds.): Climate
change 2007-the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the
fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Vol. 4), Cambridge university press,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Swenson, S. C., Lawrence, D. M., and Lee, H.: Improved simulation of the
terrestrial hydrological cycle in permafrost regions by the Community Land
Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 4, M08002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000165" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012MS000165</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tarnocai, C., Swanson, D., Kimble, J., and Broll, J.: Northern Circumpolar
Soil Carbon Database, Tech. Rep. Version 1, Research Branch, Agriculture and
Agri-Food Canada, available at: <uri>http://wms1.agr.gc.ca/NortherCircumpolar/northercircumpolar.zip</uri> (last access: 1
October 2012), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tarnocai, C., Canadell, J. G., Schuur, E. A. G., Kuhry, P., Mazhitova, G.,
and Zimov, S.: Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar
permafrost region, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB2023,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003327</ext-link>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Treat, C. C., Natali, S. M., Ernakovich, J., Iversen, C. M., Lupascu, M.,
McGuire, A. D., Norby, R. J., Roy Chowdhury, T., Richter, A.,
Šantrůčková, H., and Schädel, C.: A pan-Arctic synthesis
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production from anoxic soil incubations, Glob. Change
Biol., 21, 2787–2803, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Viovy, N.: CRUNCEP data set, available at:
<uri>ftp://nacp.ornl.gov/synthesis/2009/frescati/temp/land_use_change/original/readme.htm</uri> (last access: 11 December 2017), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wania, R., Melton, J. R., Hodson, E. L., Poulter, B., Ringeval, B., Spahni, R., Bohn, T., Avis, C. A., Chen, G., Eliseev, A. V., Hopcroft, P. O., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Tian, H., van Bodegom, P. M., Kleinen, T., Yu, Z. C., Singarayer, J. S., Zürcher, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., Beerling, D. J., Denisov, S. N., Prigent, C., Papa, F., and Kaplan, J. O.: Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: methodology of a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP), Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 617–641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-617-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-617-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zona, D., Lipson, D. A., Zulueta, R. C., Oberbauer, S. F., and Oechel, W. C.:
Microtopographic controls on ecosystem functioning in the Arctic Coastal
Plain, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 116, G00I08, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001241" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JG001241</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Ground subsidence effects on simulating dynamic high-latitude surface inundation under permafrost thaw using CLM5</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Simulating surface inundation is particularly challenging
for the high-latitude permafrost regions. Ice-rich permafrost thaw can
create expanding thermokarst lakes as well as shrinking large wetlands. Such
processes can have major biogeochemical implications and feedbacks to the
climate system by altering the pathways and rates of permafrost carbon
release. However, the processes associated with it have not yet been
properly represented in Earth system models. We show a new model
parameterization that allows direct representation of surface water dynamics
in CLM (Community Land Model), the land surface model of several Earth
System Models. Specifically, we coupled permafrost-thaw-induced ground
subsidence and surface microtopography distribution to represent surface
water dynamics in the high latitudes. Our results show increased surface
water fractions around western Siberian plains and northeastern territories
of Canada. Additionally, localized drainage events correspond well to severe
ground subsidence events. Our parameterization is one of the first steps
towards a process-oriented representation of surface hydrology, which is
crucial to assess the biogeochemical feedbacks between land and the
atmosphere under changing climate.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aas, K. S., Martin, L., Nitzbon, J., Langer, M., Boike, J., Lee, H., Berntsen, T. K., and Westermann, S.: Thaw processes in ice-rich permafrost landscapes represented with laterally coupled tiles in a land surface model, The Cryosphere, 13, 591–609, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-591-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-591-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Beven, K. and Kirkby, M.: A physically based, variable contributing area
model of basin hydrology, Hydrol. Sci. B., 24, 43–69, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Brown, J., Ferrians  Jr., O. J., Heginbottom, J. A., and Melnikov, E. S.:
Circum-Arctic Map of Permafrost and Ground-Ice Conditions version 2,
Boulder, CO: National Snow and Ice Data Center, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Chadburn, S., Burke, E., Essery, R., Boike, J., Langer, M., Heikenfeld, M., Cox, P., and Friedlingstein, P.: An improved representation of physical permafrost dynamics in the JULES land-surface model, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1493–1508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1493-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1493-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, K.-Y., Riley, W. J., Crill, P. M., Grant, R. F., Rich, V. I., and Saleska, S. R.: Large carbon cycle sensitivities to climate across a permafrost thaw gradient in subarctic Sweden, The Cryosphere, 13, 647–663, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-647-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-647-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Ekici, A.: altugekici/clm_microsigma: first release (Version v1.0.0), Zenodo, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2652181" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2652181</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Ekici, A., Beer, C., Hagemann, S., Boike, J., Langer, M., and Hauck, C.: Simulating high-latitude permafrost regions by the JSBACH terrestrial ecosystem model, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 631–647, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-631-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-631-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Gouttevin, I., Krinner, G., Ciais, P., Polcher, J., and Legout, C.: Multi-scale validation of a new soil freezing scheme for a land-surface model with physically-based hydrology, The Cryosphere, 6, 407–430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-407-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-407-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Grant, R. F., Mekonnen, Z. A., Riley, W. J., Arora, B., and Torn, M. S.:
Mathematical Modelling of Arctic Polygonal Tundra with Ecosys: 2.
Microtopography Determines How CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> Exchange Responds to Changes in
Temperature and Precipitation, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 3174–3187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004037</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Grosse, G., Jones, B., and  Arp, C.: Thermokarst Lakes, Drainage, and Drained
Basins, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, edited by:  Stocker, T. F.,  Qin, D.,  Plattner, G.-K.,  Tignor, M.,
Allen, S. K., Boschung, J.,  Nauels, A.,  Xia, Y.,  Bex, V.,  and  Midgley, P. M.,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
1535 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Knoblauch, C., Beer, C., Liebner, S., Grigoriev, M. N., and Pfeiffer, E. M.:
Methane production as key to the greenhouse gas budget of thawing
permafrost, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 309–312, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0095-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0095-z</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Slater, A. G., Romanovsky, V. E., and Nicolsky, D. J.:
Sensitivity of a model projection of near-surface permafrost degradation to
soil column depth and representation of soil organic matter, J. Geophys.
Res., 113, 1–14, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S.
C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z. L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., and
Bonan, G. B.: Parameterization improvements and functional and structural
advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 3, M03001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Oleson, K. W., Swenson, S. C.,
Bonan, G., Collier, N., Ghimire, B., van Kampenhout, L., Kennedy, D., and
Kluzek, E.: The Community Land Model version 5: Description of new features,
benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583</a>, online first, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Lee, H., Swenson, S. C., Slater, A. G., and Lawrence, D. M.: Effects of
excess ground ice on projections of permafrost in a warming
climate, Environ. Res. Lett., 9 124006, <a href="https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/12/124006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/12/124006</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Liljedahl, A. K., Boike, J., Daanen, R. P., Fedorov, A. N., Frost, G. V.,
Grosse, G., Hinzman, L. D., Iijma, Y., Jorgenson, J. C., Matveyeva, N., and
Necsoiu, M.: Pan-Arctic ice-wedge degradation in warming permafrost and its
influence on tundra hydrology, Nat. Geosci., 9, 312–318, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Malhotra, A. and Roulet, N. T.: Environmental correlates of peatland carbon fluxes in a thawing landscape: do transitional thaw stages matter?, Biogeosciences, 12, 3119–3130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3119-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3119-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Melton, J. R., Wania, R., Hodson, E. L., Poulter, B., Ringeval, B., Spahni, R., Bohn, T., Avis, C. A., Beerling, D. J., Chen, G., Eliseev, A. V., Denisov, S. N., Hopcroft, P. O., Lettenmaier, D. P., Riley, W. J., Singarayer, J. S., Subin, Z. M., Tian, H., Zürcher, S., Brovkin, V., van Bodegom, P. M., Kleinen, T., Yu, Z. C., and Kaplan, J. O.: Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP), Biogeosciences, 10, 753–788, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-753-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-753-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Muster, S., Roth, K., Langer, M., Lange, S., Cresto Aleina, F., Bartsch, A., Morgenstern, A., Grosse, G., Jones, B., Sannel, A. B. K., Sjöberg, Y., Günther, F., Andresen, C., Veremeeva, A., Lindgren, P. R., Bouchard, F., Lara, M. J., Fortier, D., Charbonneau, S., Virtanen, T. A., Hugelius, G., Palmtag, J., Siewert, M. B., Riley, W. J., Koven, C. D., and Boike, J.: PeRL: a circum-Arctic Permafrost Region Pond and Lake database, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 317–348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-317-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-317-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
NCAR CESM2 archives: <a href="http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/land" target="_blank"/>, last access: 10 October 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Olefeldt, D., Turetsky, M. R., Crill, P. M., and Mcguire, A. D.:
Environmental and physical controls on northern terrestrial methane
emissions across permafrost zones, Glob. Change Biol., 19, 589–603,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12071</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Bonan, G. B., Drewniak, B., Huang, M.,
Koven, C. D., Levis, S., Li, F., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Swenson, S. C.,
Thornton, P. E., Bozbiyik, A., Fisher, R., Kluzek, E., Lamarque, J. -F.,
Lawrence, P. J., Leung, L. R., Lipscomb, W., Muszala, S., Ricciuto, D. M.,
Sacks, W., Sun, Y., Tang, J., and Yang, Z.-L: Technical Description of
version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM), Ncar Technical Note
NCAR/TN-503+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO,
422 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RR1W7M" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RR1W7M</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Prigent, C., Papa, F., Aires, F., Rossow, W. B., and Matthews, E.: Global
inundation dynamics inferred from multiple satellite observations,
1993–2000, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 112, D12107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007847" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007847</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Prigent, C., Papa, F., Aires, F., Jimenez, C., Rossow, W. B., and Matthews,
E.: Changes in land surface water dynamics since the 1990s and relation to
population pressure, Geophys. Res. Let., 39, L08403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051276</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Reichhardt, T.: Academy under fire on “wetlands” definition, Nature, 375, 171–171, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Lawrence, D. M., Swenson, S. C., Torn, M. S., Meng, L., Mahowald, N. M., and Hess, P.: Barriers to predicting changes in global terrestrial methane fluxes: analyses using CLM4Me, a methane biogeochemistry model integrated in CESM, Biogeosciences, 8, 1925–1953, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1925-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1925-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Brovkin, V., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P., Covey, K., Curry, C., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., Marshall, J., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Pison, I., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Santini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, P., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R., Wiedinmyer, C., Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: The global methane budget 2000–2012, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 697–751, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Schuur, E. A., Bockheim, J., Canadell, J. G., Euskirchen, E., Field, C. B.,
Goryachkin, S. V., Hagemann, S., Kuhry, P., Lafleur, P. M., Lee, H., and
Mazhitova, G.: Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change:
Implications for the global carbon cycle, AIBS Bulletin, 58, 701–714,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Serreze, M. C. and Francis, J. A.: The Arctic amplification debate, Climatic
Change, 76, 241–264, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Averyt, K., and Marquis, M. (Eds.): Climate
change 2007-the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the
fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Vol. 4), Cambridge university press,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Swenson, S. C., Lawrence, D. M., and Lee, H.: Improved simulation of the
terrestrial hydrological cycle in permafrost regions by the Community Land
Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 4, M08002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000165" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000165</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Tarnocai, C., Swanson, D., Kimble, J., and Broll, J.: Northern Circumpolar
Soil Carbon Database, Tech. Rep. Version 1, Research Branch, Agriculture and
Agri-Food Canada, available at: <a href="http://wms1.agr.gc.ca/NortherCircumpolar/northercircumpolar.zip" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1
October 2012), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Tarnocai, C., Canadell, J. G., Schuur, E. A. G., Kuhry, P., Mazhitova, G.,
and Zimov, S.: Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar
permafrost region, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB2023,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003327</a>, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Treat, C. C., Natali, S. M., Ernakovich, J., Iversen, C. M., Lupascu, M.,
McGuire, A. D., Norby, R. J., Roy Chowdhury, T., Richter, A.,
Šantrůčková, H., and Schädel, C.: A pan-Arctic synthesis
of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> production from anoxic soil incubations, Glob. Change
Biol., 21, 2787–2803, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Viovy, N.: CRUNCEP data set, available at:
<a href="ftp://nacp.ornl.gov/synthesis/2009/frescati/temp/land_use_change/original/readme.htm" target="_blank"/> (last access: 11 December 2017), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Wania, R., Melton, J. R., Hodson, E. L., Poulter, B., Ringeval, B., Spahni, R., Bohn, T., Avis, C. A., Chen, G., Eliseev, A. V., Hopcroft, P. O., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Tian, H., van Bodegom, P. M., Kleinen, T., Yu, Z. C., Singarayer, J. S., Zürcher, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., Beerling, D. J., Denisov, S. N., Prigent, C., Papa, F., and Kaplan, J. O.: Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: methodology of a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP), Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 617–641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-617-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-617-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Zona, D., Lipson, D. A., Zulueta, R. C., Oberbauer, S. F., and Oechel, W. C.:
Microtopographic controls on ecosystem functioning in the Arctic Coastal
Plain, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 116, G00I08, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001241" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001241</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
