<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-12-1991-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>ATTILA 4.0: Lagrangian advective and convective transport <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>of passive
tracers within the ECHAM5/MESSy (2.53.0) chemistry–climate model</article-title><alt-title>Lagrangian transport in EMAC</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Lagrangian transport in EMAC}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. Brinkop and P. J\"{o}ckel}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Brinkop</surname><given-names>Sabine</given-names></name>
          <email>Sabine.Brinkop@dlr.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3167-203X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jöckel</surname><given-names>Patrick</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-1394</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für
Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>82230 Wessling,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Meteorologisches Institut der Universität München,
80333 Munich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Sabine Brinkop (Sabine.Brinkop@dlr.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>1991</fpage><lpage>2008</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Sabine Brinkop</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e99">We have extended ATTILA (Atmospheric Tracer Transport in a LAgrangian model),
a Lagrangian tracer transport scheme, which is online coupled to the global
ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model, with a combination of newly
developed and modified physical routines and new diagnostic and
infrastructure submodels. The new physical routines comprise a
parameterisation for Lagrangian convection, a formulation of diabatic
vertical velocity, and the new grid-point submodel LGTMIX to calculate the
mixing of compounds in Lagrangian representation. The new infrastructure
routines simplify the transformation between grid-point (GP) and Lagrangian
(LG) space in a parallel computing environment. The new submodel LGVFLUX is a
useful diagnostic tool to calculate online vertical mass fluxes through
horizontal surfaces. The submodel DRADON was extended to account for
emissions and changes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn on Lagrangian parcels. To evaluate the
new physical routines, two simulations in free-running mode with prescribed
sea surface temperatures were performed with EMAC–ATTILA in T42L47MA
resolution from 1950 to 2010. The results show an improvement of the tracer
transport into and within the stratosphere when the diabatic vertical
velocity is used for vertical advection in ATTILA instead of the standard
kinematic vertical velocity. In particular, the age-of-air distribution is
more in
accordance with observations. The global tropospheric distribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn, however, is simulated in agreement with available observations
and with the results from EMAC in grid space for both Lagrangian systems.
Additional sensitivity studies reveal an effect of inter-parcel mixing on the
age of air in the tropopause region and the stratosphere, but there is no
significant effect for the troposphere.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page1992?><p id="d1e129">Due to the increasing demand for including interactive tracers in climate
simulations it is becoming necessary to use global models which meet the
needs of a fast and exact tracer transport scheme. Commonly used methods to
describe large-scale transport in a general circulation model of the
atmosphere follow the Eulerian method. The Lagrangian (LG) method (i.e. from
the perspective of a fluid particle or parcel) is more frequently used
offline for trajectory studies in particle models like the global 3-D
chemistry transport model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.1"/>, FLEXPART <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.2"/>, and
CLaMS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.3"/>. Exceptions are the LG models ATTILA (Atmospheric
Tracer Transport in a LAgrangian model; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="altparen.4"/>) and CLaMS, which
has recently been coupled to the global chemistry–climate model EMAC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.5"/>. Describing the transport of tracers with an LG transport
scheme has advantages compared to an Eulerian transport method: mass
conservation (not in CLaMS) and the absence of numerical diffusion. These
advantages become most important if tracer distributions are inhomogeneous
with strong vertical or horizontal gradients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.6"/>, which ought
to be smoothed by physical and not by numerical diffusion
processes.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p id="d1e152">ATTILA has already been used to study the advantage of Lagrangian water vapour
and cloud water transport on the model climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.7"/>.  The
results show reduced and thus more realistic water vapour concentrations in
the lowermost extratropical stratosphere, a steeper meridional water vapour
gradient in the subtropics, and a reduced cold bias around the tropopause
near the poles.  Furthermore, ATTILA had been used within studies of the
climate impact of aviation and climate-optimised air traffic routing
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.8"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e161">In this study we introduce the extended and improved LG advection scheme
ATTILA, which has been parallelised,
modularised, and rewritten as a submodel for EMAC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.9"/>. ATTILA
was originally developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.10"/>. We implemented an LG convection
scheme and a diabatic vertical velocity formulation, which can be selected
instead of the standard kinematic vertical velocity. The need for these two
physical improvements is due to the following reasons.</p>
      <p id="d1e170">First, the large-scale transport of trace species is
sensitive to the selected vertical velocity scheme
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.11"/>. Therefore, several studies recommend the use of a diabatic
vertical velocity for the representation of LG transport in the tropical
tropopause layer and the stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.12"/>.
Specific transport characteristics like the residence time in the tropical
tropopause layer (TTL) and the
pathways to the stratospheric overworld are simulated more realistically
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.13"/> with a diabatic vertical velocity.
Typically, kinematic velocities are calculated as a residual from the
horizontal flux divergence using the continuity equation. Because horizontal
velocities are 2 orders of magnitude larger than the vertical velocity,
kinematic velocities show up as rather noisy.</p>
      <p id="d1e183">Second, convective transport is an
important fast vertical transport process for trace species in the
troposphere, and tracer distributions are sensitive to the convection
parameterisation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.14"/>.  The vertical tracer
distribution depends on the accuracy of transport from the boundary layer,
where the chemical species are emitted, into the free troposphere.  Two LG
transport schemes are known to use a convection parameterisation: the CLaMS
transport model considers convection by using the moist Brunt–Väisälä
frequency parameterisation to include the effects of vertical instability on
the related convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.15"/>.  In the FLEXPART transport model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.16"/> the convection scheme relies on the ECMWF grid-scale temperature
and humidity and provides a matrix for vertical convective particle
displacement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.17"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e198">In the former (non-parallelised) version of ATTILA, convective tracer
tendencies were calculated in grid-point space and then transformed onto the
parcels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.18"/>. This transformation, however, is not
mass conserving. Moreover, parcel trajectories do not follow convective
updrafts
and downdrafts. This is a drawback with respect to the analysis of
trajectories, which were subject to convective uplift, and the motivation to
incorporate an LG convection scheme in ATTILA. Besides the transport of
parcels, mixing of compounds between adjacent parcels is an important
process that reduces gradients of trace gases horizontally and vertically.
Physically, the character of turbulence in the atmosphere (due to wind shear
or buoyancy) controls the degree of mixing. An LG model that successfully
uses a physical parameterisation for mixing based on the atmospheric flow
deformation is CLaMS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.19"/>. However,
our parameterisation of mixing, realised in the new submodel LGTMIX, is so far
only based on two parameters: one for the troposphere and one for the
stratosphere, and it represents local isotropic turbulent mixing.
This concept was already successfully applied by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.20"/>. However,
LGTMIX is written to more easily allow for the incorporation of more physically sound
mixing parameterisations in the future.</p>
      <p id="d1e210">In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> we shortly repeat the main concepts of ATTILA, which
were published in detail by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.21"/>, and we introduce the
application and extensions of the MESSy infrastructure and the concept of
the calculation of random numbers in a parallel computing environment.
Additionally, we describe the new LG convection parameterisation and the
diabatic velocity of the new ATTILA version. The turbulent mixing of
compounds between the parcels (submodel LGTMIX), the extended diagnostics
(submodel LGVFLUX), the extensions to the submodel DRADON to handle
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn in LG representation, and the submodel LGGP, calculating the
transformations between GP and LG representation, are also described in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>. The observational data for comparison are described in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> describes the model simulations
performed with ATTILA coupled to the global chemistry–climate model EMAC. The
evaluation of the LG simulations is presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>. We
compare the LG simulation results with observations and also with EMAC (GP)
simulations, which were already evaluated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.22"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model description</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>EMAC – a MESSy-fied global chemistry–climate model</title>
      <p id="d1e254">The ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model is a numerical chemistry
and climate simulation system that includes submodels describing tropospheric
and middle atmosphere processes and their interaction with oceans, land, and
human influences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.23"/>. It uses the second version of the Modular
Earth Submodel System (MESSy2) to link multi-institutional computer<?pagebreak page1993?> codes.
The core atmospheric model is the fifth-generation European Centre Hamburg
general circulation model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">ECHAM5;</named-content></xref>. For the present study
we applied EMAC (ECHAM5 version 5.3.02, MESSy version 2.53.0 in the
T42L47MA-resolution, i.e. with a spherical truncation of T42, corresponding
to a quadratic Gaussian grid of approximately 2.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by 2.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
latitude and longitude) with 47 vertical hybrid pressure levels up to
0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (middle atmosphere). The applied model set-up comprised the
submodels listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e297">List of MESSy submodels used for the simulations in this
study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="219.08622pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Submodel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Reference(s)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AEROPT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AERosol OPTical properties</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.25"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ATTILA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Atmospheric Tracer Transport In a LAgrangian model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.26"/>; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Methane oxidation and feedback to stratospheric <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>water vapour</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CLOUD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECHAM5 cloud scheme as MESSy submodel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">

                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.27"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>
                    
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CLOUDOPT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cloud optical properties</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.28"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CONVECT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Convection parameterisations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.29"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CVTRANS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Convective tracer transport</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.30"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DRADON</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn and decay products as diagnostic tracers</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.31"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E5DIFF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECHAM5 vertical diffusion scheme as MESSy submodel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">

                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.32"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>
                    
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GWAVE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECHAM5 gravity wave parameterisation as MESSy submodel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">

                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.33"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>
                    
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JVAL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Photolysis rates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.34"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGGP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Transformation between LG and GP and vice versa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGTMIX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LaGrangian Tracer MIXing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGVFLUX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LaGrangian based Vertical FLUX analyses</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OFFEMIS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OFFline (i.e. prescribed) EMISsions of tracers</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.35"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ORBIT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Earth ORBITal parameters as MESSy submodel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">

                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.36"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>
                    
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OROGW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECHAM5 OROgraphic gravity wave parameterisation as<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>MESSy submodel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">

                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.37"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>
                    
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PTRAC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prognostic TRACers defined via namelist</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.38"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">QBO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Newtonian relaxation of quasi-biennial oscillation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx26" id="text.39"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RAD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECHAM5 radiation scheme as MESSy submodel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.40"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RAD_FUBRAD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High-resolution short-wave radiation sub-submodel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx6" id="text.41"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SURFACE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECHAM5 surface scheme as MESSy submodel</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">

                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.42"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>
                    
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TNUDGE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Newtonian relaxation of tracers as pseudo-emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.43"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TROPOP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropopause and other diagnostics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.44"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VAXTRA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Vertical AXes TRAnsformations (for output)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VISO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Iso-surfaces and maps</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.45"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e300"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Formerly called OFFLEM.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e758">The following list gives an overview of the modified and newly developed
routines, which are presented in more detail in the following sections.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>a.</label>
      <p id="d1e763">Modifications and extensions of physical processes included
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e768">additional subroutines for ATTILA to describe Lagrangian convection,</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e772">a formulation of vertical movement of air parcels in ATTILA based on the
diabatic vertical velocity,</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e776">a new submodel (LGTMIX) to calculate the mixing of compounds in Lagrangian
representation, and</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e780">expansion of the submodel DRADON to account for the emission and decay of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn for the new Lagrangian representation of tracers.</p></list-item></list></p></list-item><list-item><label>b.</label>
      <p id="d1e793">New diagnostic and infrastructure submodels included
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e798">a new submodel for the infrastructure, such as for the calculation of random numbers in a
parallel environment,</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e802">a sub-submodel that hosts the basic transformation routines needed in
ATTILA to convert variables from grid-point to Lagrangian representation and
vice versa (ATTILA_TOOLS),</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e806">a new submodel that uses ATTILA_TOOLS to calculate the transformation
of user-specified variables between Lagrangian and grid-point space and vice
versa (LGGP) for the output, and</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e810">a new submodel to diagnose the vertical fluxes through horizontal
surfaces (LGVFLUX).</p></list-item></list></p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Submodel ATTILA: Atmospheric Tracer Transport In a LAgrangian model</title>
      <p id="d1e821">ATTILA is a Lagrangian tracer transport scheme, now including LG convection,
which can optionally be selected to transport tracers in Lagrangian
representation in addition to the standard flux-form semi-Lagrangian (FFSL)
scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.46"/> for tracers in GP representation.</p>
      <p id="d1e827">ATTILA runs online as a submodel within EMAC. A former version of ATTILA has
been described in detail by <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.47"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>. The main concepts of
ATTILA are shortly repeated in this section (time-stepping procedure,
interpolation methods, initialisation) and complemented by new infrastructure
(random number generator, parallelisation, transformation and transposition
methods), as well as new physical (air
parcel mixing, Lagrangian convection) and diagnostic submodels.</p>
      <p id="d1e835">In ATTILA the atmospheric mass is divided into single mass packets, which have
an equal air mass loading but no volume. The parcels are regarded as
centroids when they are advected with the wind field provided by the spectral
dynamical core of EMAC.  The number of parcels within the atmosphere is only
limited by the available computational resources.  A typical choice is an
average of three parcels per EMAC grid box, similar to what was documented by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.48"/>.  However, the actual number of parcels per grid box may vary
between zero and 10, depending on the vertical and horizontal size of the grid
box.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Model infrastructure</title>
      <p id="d1e848">To enable ATTILA in a distributed memory parallel environment (e.g. applying
a message-passing interface standard, MPI) we chose to follow a domain
cloning approach. Whereas the base model EMAC follows a classical horizontal
domain decomposition approach for distributed memory parallelisation, we
distribute the global number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of ATTILA air parcels, which keep their
identity throughout a simulation, (almost) equally among the parallel tasks
(index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M13" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of parallel tasks and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the number of parcels
bound to task physical and not by numerical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, except for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, depending on whether <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is divisible by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or not.</p>
      <p id="d1e989">During the simulation, each parcel keeps being bound to its initial task.
Since all parcels on each task move around the entire globe with time, it is
necessary to provide the required input variables to drive ATTILA (such as
the wind velocity vector from EMAC) as global fields (i.e. by cloning of the
global domain of these variables). The subroutines for data transpositions
between parallel decomposed grid points and corresponding cloned global
variables have been added to the MESSy infrastructure submodel TRANSFORM.</p>
      <p id="d1e992">To facilitate the exchange of Lagrangian objects between Lagrangian-enabled
submodels as so-called <italic>channel objects</italic> (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.49"/>, for
a detailed explanation of the MESSy infrastructure submodel CHANNEL), we
define a new <italic>representation</italic> (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.50"/>, for a detailed
explanation) of rank 1, global dimension length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and local (i.e. task
specific) dimension length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The corresponding MPI-based gather and
scatter routines for serial NetCDF I/O have been added to the MESSy
infrastructure<?pagebreak page1994?> submodel TRANSFORM. This new
<italic>representation</italic>, named LG_ATTILA,
is used by the Lagrangian submodels to define their specific Lagrangian
objects.</p>
      <p id="d1e1029">For tracers we further define two additional <italic>tracer sets</italic> (see
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.51"/> for a detailed explanation), one (“tracer_lg”) in the
new Lagrangian <italic>representation</italic> to
handle the Lagrangian tracers and one “tracer_lggp” in grid-point
<italic>representation</italic>. The latter is
solely used to transform the Lagrangian tracers into grid-point space for
output and further analyses.</p>
      <p id="d1e1045">Subroutines to transform and transpose variables between Lagrangian
<italic>representation</italic> and (parallel
decomposed) grid-point <italic>representation</italic>, and vice versa, are collected in a specific toolbox module named
ATTILA_TOOLS. This also comprises specific subroutines for the
transformation of grid-point emission fluxes into Lagrangian tracer
tendencies. For the latter, four options are implemented: the emitted mass
from a grid cell is distributed in one of the following ways.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1056"><italic>Evenly among all LG parcels in that grid box</italic>. In the case that there is no parcel
at a given time in that grid box, the mass is stored and accumulated over
time and eventually released into the next parcel(s) passing by.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1062"><italic>Evenly among all LG parcels in the lowest grid box of the boundary layer with at least one parcel in it</italic>. In the case that the entire column in the boundary
layer is empty (i.e. no parcels) at a given time, the mass is stored,
accumulated, and eventually released to the next parcel as in (1).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1068"><italic>Among all parcels in the boundary layer</italic>.
However, it is weighted with a linear, negative vertical gradient. The treatment of
empty boundary layer columns is as in (1) and (2).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1074"><italic>Evenly among all parcels in the boundary layer</italic>. The treatment of
empty boundary layer columns is as in (1), (2), and (3).</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e1079">ATTILA requires up to four series of pseudo-random numbers, one for the
boundary layer turbulence parameterisation (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>), one for the
convection parameterisation (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4"/>), one for an envisaged
(but not yet implemented) additional clear air turbulence parameterisation,
and one for particle displacements parameterising a Monte Carlo diffusion
approach. One additional pseudo-random number series is used for the initial
distribution of the parcels in the model atmosphere. These pseudo-random
number series are provided by the MESSy infrastructure submodel RND. RND
provides uniformly distributed pseudo-random numbers between 0 and 1,
calculated with the standard Fortran90 function,
<monospace>RANDOM_NUMBER</monospace>, the Mersenne Twister algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.52"/>, or
the Luxury algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.53"/>. Based on these, RND can also
provide normally distributed random numbers centred around zero using the
Marsaglia polar
method<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d1e1096"><uri>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsaglia_polar_method</uri>(last access: 6 May 2019)</p></fn>. The generation of high-quality pseudo-random
number series in a parallel environment is not straightforward. Seeding
independent series on each task implies the high risk that these series
will become correlated. Moreover, the result is decomposition dependent; i.e. it
depends on the number of tasks, which is not desirable. One solution is to
seed one common series on one task and to distribute the resulting
pseudo-random numbers to all other tasks. This implies a load imbalance and
requires additional MPI communication, yet for most pseudo-random
number generators it is the only possibility. However, for the Mersenne
Twister<fn id="Ch1.Footn2"><p id="d1e1102">Only for uniformly distributed pseudo-random numbers, i.e.
without the Marsaglia polar method.</p></fn> (among others) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.54"/> found an
efficient “jump ahead” facility, i.e. a method to advance the
pseudo-random number generator state vector by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> steps (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> integer with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), without the need to harvest all
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> pseudo-random numbers. Jumping ahead by numbers not representable in the
form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be achieved by additionally harvesting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
pseudo-random numbers such that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This procedure can
nicely be used for a parallel decomposition independent method for the parallel
generation of pseudo-random number series and has been implemented in the
MESSy infrastructure submodel RND. The same pseudo-random number series is
seeded on all tasks, which then jump ahead and harvest independently, i.e.
without additional communication overhead between the tasks. Each task can
jump ahead directly to the chunk of pseudo-random numbers it needs to
harvest. The only prerequisite for this to work is that the number of
required pseudo-random numbers per (each) task is a priori known to all other
tasks. For instance, if for each ATTILA parcel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> pseudo-random numbers are
required (e.g. per model time step), in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pseudo-random
numbers need to be harvested, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for task <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. That means
that task <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> needs to jump ahead by
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M38" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            steps before it can harvest its own chunk of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pseudo-random
numbers.</p>
      <p id="d1e1328">For the simulations analysed below, we used three uniformly distributed
pseudo-random number series, all generated with the Mersenne Twister
algorithm: for the boundary layer turbulence scheme, for the convection
parameterisation, and for the initial placement of the Lagrangian parcels.
The Monte Carlo diffusion was switched off.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1995?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Advection</title>
      <p id="d1e1340">For every time step (in our simulations: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s), the parcels
are advected by the three-dimensional wind field using a fourth-order Runge–Kutta
method. The wind field is interpolated on the parcel positions by linear
interpolation horizontally (i.e. on the latitude–longitude grid) and by
cubic Hermite interpolation vertically. The initialisation of the positions
in the atmosphere is carried out randomly so that the number of parcels
corresponds to the mass of the respective model layer.</p>
      <p id="d1e1357">In the vertical direction we may use either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-coordinate vertical
velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>-kinematic velocity) calculated
from the horizontal flux divergence using the continuity equation or
isentropic coordinates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> , where the vertical velocities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> are
calculated from the EMAC diabatic heating rates (diabatic velocity). The
kinematic velocity is provided by default from EMAC, whereas the diabatic
velocity was newly implemented similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.55"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.56"/>.
In our notation,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being the potential temperature and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being defined as

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M49" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">If</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">If</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being the atmospheric
pressure; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the atmospheric pressure of the climatological
tropopause, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the heat capacity at constant pressure. It
characterises the transition from a pure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-coordinate system to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-coordinate system. The standard surface pressure is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1013.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the actual surface pressure.</p>
      <p id="d1e1671">The vertical velocity in this coordinate system is defined as the time
derivative of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M59" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The diabatic vertical velocity in the troposphere <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appears as a mixed velocity between pure diabatic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
and kinematic velocity in the troposphere according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>).
Only in the stratosphere is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> a pure diabatic velocity.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1996?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Turbulence</title>
      <p id="d1e1763">Every parcel located within the planetary boundary layer (PBL) is randomly
displaced in the vertical direction within the corresponding grid cell.
This stochastic mixing represents the boundary layer convective mixing process.
The boundary layer height is calculated outside of ATTILA within the submodel
TROPOP.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>2.2.4</label><title>Convection</title>
      <p id="d1e1774">The LG convection scheme uses the mass fluxes of the standard grid-box
convection scheme in EMAC (submodel CONVECT) to calculate the convective
parcel movement. Therefore, we will first shortly introduce the convection
scheme of EMAC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.57"/> because the LG convection scheme
is based on it. Convection in the standard convection scheme is initiated when
the convergence of moisture in a vertical column of the atmosphere exceeds a
certain threshold value and a convectively unstable layer exists. Three types
of convection are distinguished: deep convection occurs if moisture
convergence through advection and evaporation at the surface takes place.
Shallow convection occurs if moisture convergence is only by evaporation at the
surface, and mid-level convection occurs if the criteria of deep and shallow
convection are not fulfilled but 90 % relative humidity is reached within
the planetary boundary layer.</p>
      <p id="d1e1780">Convection is parameterised by dividing a vertical column into an area of
updraft (superscript u), downdraft (superscript d), and an area of
compensating motion in the environment (superscript e). Convective transport
in EMAC is parameterised only in the vertical direction as a divergence of the
tracer mass fluxes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">conv</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the tracer mass mixing ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass flux,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the air density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical wind
component, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the height. The quantities with an overbar are horizontal
averages over the grid box, and the quantities marked with a prime are the
horizontal deviations from the respective grid-box mean variables.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> , <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the mass
fluxes of air for updraft, downdraft, and the environment, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e2058">The change in mass fluxes with height is dependent on entrainment and
detrainment fluxes.

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">with</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) comprises the entrainment (detrainment) rates
due to turbulent exchange of mass through cloud edges, and for the updraft
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> only, it implies the organised inflow associated with
large-scale moisture convergence in cases of deep or mid-level convection.
Accordingly, the detrainment rates include the turbulent exchange in updraft,
downdraft, and, for the updraft only, the organised outflow at cloud top.</p>
      <p id="d1e2211">The corresponding tracer mass fluxes are as follows.

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M80" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E13"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>13</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              The calculation of the convective transport of tracer mass starts with the
determination of the type of convection (deep, shallow, mid-level). According
to the estimated convective available potential energy (CAPE) the mass flux at
cloud base is calculated. Further details of the calculation of the mass
fluxes are described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.58"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.59"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2414">In our LG convection scheme air parcels can follow the updraft, downdraft, or
the compensating motion in the environment at a grid column with convection
within one time step. The forcing used for the Lagrangian convection scheme
is provided by the mass fluxes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the convection scheme of EMAC for
updraft and downdraft, respectively. Probabilities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for each level are
calculated from the mass fluxes within a vertical column. Each LG parcel is
equipped with a (precalculated) random number (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>).
For each parcel, ascend (or descend) in an updraft (downdraft) is applied with
probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The probability for an air parcel to follow the updraft <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is equal to the ratio of the mass of the air parcel moving into the updraft
to the mass of air at that level.</p>
      <p id="d1e2447">If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which means that the mass flux increases with height,
then
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            with
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>and</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents air
mass fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is gravity acceleration, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is time step length (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2751">If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e the mass flux decreases with height, a
negative probability is defined to reflect a situation in which a parcel may
leave the updraft due to detrainment. The probability is equal to the ratio
of the mass leaving the level to the mass entering the same level from below:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M98" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The equations of the probability functions are analogous for the downdraft.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1997?><p id="d1e2830">The LG convection scheme strictly conserves local mass because for every
time step the number of parcels per grid box after convection equals the
number before convection (see <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> const. in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Every
updraft and downdraft forces a compensating large-scale motion of parcels.
The probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for subsidence is not estimated from the mass fluxes
provided by EMAC. It is calculated for every layer, depending on the number
of parcels that need to subside in order to fulfil the mass conservation for
every layer.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2854">Mode of operation of Lagrangian convection in a vertical column.
Coloured circles are Lagrangian parcels; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 4, and 5 is the original number
of parcels in a grid box (chosen arbitrarily for this example) that should
be reached again after the convective event to keep the air mass in each grid
box constant.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Submodel LGGP: transformation between Lagrangian and Eulerian
representation</title>
      <p id="d1e2884">The submodel LGGP (LaGrangian to Grid Point transformations) performs the
transformation of variables from Lagrangian representation to grid-point
representation or vice versa. The variables (channel objects) to be
transformed are specified by the user in the &amp;CPL namelist of the submodel.</p>
      <p id="d1e2887">Transformations of a variable from LG to GP use the information of
all parcels in the corresponding grid box and calculate
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2892">the sum of this variable over all parcels,</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2896">the average of the variable over all parcels,</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2900">the standard deviation of the variable over all parcels, or</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2904">the average of the variable over all parcels in which the variable is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list>
Grid boxes without parcels are either filled with a constant value (defined by
the user in the &amp;CPL namelist) or with the value from a selected grid-point
variable (defined as channel object in the &amp;CPL namelist).</p>
      <p id="d1e2918">The transformation from GP to LG distributes the variable onto all parcels in
the respective grid box, either mass conserving (i.e. with equal share) or
uniformly (i.e. with the same value of the GP variable). An example
&amp;CPL namelist is shown in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Submodel LGTMIX: mixing of compounds in Lagrangian representation</title>
      <p id="d1e2929">The submodel LGTMIX (LaGrangian Tracer MIXing) calculates the exchange of
tracer mass between Lagrangian parcels. Each Lagrangian parcel is described
by a mathematical point. Its tracer mixing ratio represents a mean over the
whole parcel. Turbulence in the ambient air leads to the mixing of air of
adjacent parcels. In order to avoid parcel-to-parcel communication, we
define a background mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, with which the parcel can
communicate. The background is defined by the mean mixing ratio of the
individual parcels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within one grid box of the EMAC grid:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><label>17</label><mml:math id="M105" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The altered mixing ratio of the respective parcel is then calculated by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">new</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being a dimensionless mixing parameter within the range [0,1],
which controls the magnitude of the exchange.</p>
      <p id="d1e3039">The user can specify in the LGTMIX &amp;CPL namelist the mixing parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
individually for vertical model level ranges defined by two external layer
definitions (i.e. external channel objects), such as the boundary layer
height (from TROPOP), the tropopause (from TROPOP), or any surface provided
by VISO (a diagnostic submodel to diagnose vertically layered 2-D
iso-surfaces in 3-D scalar fields and to map 3-D scalar fields in GP
representation on iso-surfaces; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.60"/>). The value for each of
these layers can either be a constant or a function defined by scaling an
external grid-point variable (channel object) in a given range
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to be specified by the user) to the interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the
latter case, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can also be time dependent. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in each of these<?pagebreak page1998?> layers
can be scaled further for each tracer individually. An example &amp;CPL namelist
is shown in the Supplement. For our simulations discussed below, standard
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the troposphere and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
stratosphere follow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.61"/>. Additional tracers
for diagnostic purposes have been simulated without mixing in the
stratosphere (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scaled by 0.0) and with doubled mixing strength
(i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scaled by 2.0) in the stratosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Submodel LGVFLUX: diagnostic of vertical fluxes through horizontal
surfaces</title>
      <p id="d1e3165">The submodel LGVFLUX is a useful tool to calculate online vertical
mass fluxes through horizontal surfaces. Mass fluxes through a
two-dimensional surface (e.g. isentropic surface, potential vorticity
iso-surface, pressure level) are calculated by analysing the movement of LG
particles through these surfaces (upward or downward) and summing over all
particles which cross the surface per unit time and area:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><label>18</label><mml:math id="M117" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sfc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sfc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the mass flux through the horizontal surface
(indicated by the subscript “sfc”), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the mass of an LG
parcel that is transported through the surface with area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in time
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. the model time step length). For air, the mixing ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 1.0, and for tracer mass fluxes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
corresponding tracer mixing ratio. In order to avoid summation over fast,
reversible transitions, each surface definition is associated with a minimum
residence time each parcel needs after crossing the surface. For
taking into account this minimum residence time, each parcel is equipped with
a clock to directly measure its transit time. If the parcel crosses a
selected horizontal surface, its clock is started and will be reset only if
the parcel moves across the surface into the opposite direction. Thus, these
“clocks” represent the transit time since passing through a specific
surface. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> we present results calculated with this new
tool to diagnose the stratosphere–troposphere exchange of air mass and to
estimate the age of air (AoA) and the AoA spectra from the transit times in the
stratosphere. An example &amp;CPL namelist is shown in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>DRADON</title>
      <p id="d1e3286">The submodel DRADON (diagnostic radon tracer in GP space (see Sect. 6.1 in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.62"/>) has been expanded to handle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn and its decay
products as tracers in Lagrangian representation (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>).
Here, we simulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn with a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn source of
10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atoms</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over ice-free land (zero elsewhere)
and a decay with a half-life of 3.8 d as the only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn sink.</p>
      <p id="d1e3357">Further, for the transformation of emission fluxes in GP space into
Lagrangian tracer tendencies, the new routines of ATTILA_TOOLS (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>) have been used. As an emission method we selected
option 2 (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>); i.e. we put the emitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn
mass into parcels which reside lowest in the boundary layer. An
example &amp;CPL namelist is shown in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Observations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{222}}$Rn}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn</title>
      <p id="d1e3398"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn has been frequently used for an evaluation of large-scale and
convective transport processes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.63"/>,
particularly due to its short lifetime. We selected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn measurements
with an annual cycle at different sites over the globe as published by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.64"/> and vertical profiles from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.65"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.66"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn is emitted from land surfaces due to a
radioactive decay of radium in soils. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn has a characteristically
short radioactive half-life (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d). For the
evaluation of the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn distribution we use monthly mean
surface values from 18 stations worldwide and selected vertical profiles. The
large set of monthly mean surface values was collected from the literature by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.67"/> and is used here for comparison. Observations of the vertical
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn are rare, especially if they cover more than the
boundary layer. We use two different data sets of vertical profiles for
comparison, as outlined below.</p>
      <p id="d1e3488"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.68"/> used flights from the Kuiper Airborne Observatory in summer 1994
to achieve a representative selection of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn measurements in the free
troposphere. The flights were made from 3 June until 16 August 1994 around
Moffett Field in California (37.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 122<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), where
11 single profiles could be realised with a vertical resolution of
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3528"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.69"/> compiled a data set from nine flights in August 1993 from cities
in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick on the east coast of Canada to the western
North Atlantic Ocean during the North Atlantic Regional Experiment (NARE)
Intensive. The vertical height of the measurements is restricted from the
surface to about 5.5 km.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Age of air</title>
      <?pagebreak page1999?><p id="d1e3541">Mean age of air (AoA) is a common metric to quantify the overall capabilities
of a global model to simulate stratospheric transport. It describes the
transit time of air parcels in the stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.70"/>. AoA is
calculated (in the model and observations) from an inert tracer with linearly
increasing boundary conditions at the surface. AoA at a certain grid point in
the stratosphere is then calculated as the time lag between the local tracer
mixing ratio and the mixing ratio at a reference point (e.g. the boundary
layer in the tropics). Inert tracers from observations are
anthropogenically emitted sulfur hexafluoride (SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.71"/> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.72"/>. Both
will be used for comparison.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Model simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e3582">We performed two identical simulations with EMAC–ATTILA with respect to the
climate: one uses the kinematic vertical velocity to drive the Lagrangian
parcels, and the other uses the diabatic vertical velocity. The horizontal
velocity remains equal in both simulations. EMAC was operated in T42L47MA
resolution with 47 levels up to 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>).
We simulated the years 1950 to 2010 with prescribed sea surface temperatures
(SSTs) from the global data set HadISST (available from
<uri>http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadisst/</uri>, last access: 6 May 2019;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="altparen.73"/>) similar as for the RC1-base-08 free-running simulation (see
ESCiMo project description by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.74"/>). In contrast to the
simulations within the ESCiMo project, our simulations do not simulate
interactive chemistry; however, monthly averages of radiatively active
substances (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) have been prescribed from RC1-base-08. Methane was initialised
as in RC1-base-08 and the same pseudo-emission time series (by Newtonian
relaxation at the surface with the submodel TNUDGE) has been applied.
However, methane oxidation and its contribution to stratospheric water vapour
were treated in a simplified manner (with the submodel CH4): the oxidation
educts <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been prescribed as monthly
averages from RC1-base-08. The photolysis rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated
with the submodel JVAL.</p>
      <p id="d1e3714">ATTILA was initialised with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parcels, which in sum
represent the total mass of the atmosphere. The parcels were initially
positioned according to the mass distribution in grid space. The results of
the two simulations are further denoted as
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3734">GP for the results of the grid-point simulation (EMAC; note that these
are identical in both simulations),</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3738">LG(diab) for the results of EMAC–ATTILA with diabatic vertical
velocity, and</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3742">LG(kin) for the results of EMAC–ATTILA with kinematic vertical velocity.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e3745">The LG parcels are equipped with tracers with different properties.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3750"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn is a commonly used tracer to study vertical transport into
the upper troposphere due to its characteristically short radioactive
half-life of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d). In our simulations it is
emitted at the surface with an emission rate of
10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atoms</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over ice-free land surfaces between
90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3824">SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA and SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoAc are inert synthetic tracers. They differ
with respect to the surface source. Both are nudged by Newtonian relaxation
at the lowest model layer towards a linearly increasing mixing ratio. Note
that
for SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA the linear-in-time increasing mixing ratio is latitude
dependent. Using a spatially constant surface source (SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoAc) has the
advantage that concentration differences in the atmosphere cannot have their
origin in the distribution of surface sources.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3864">SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA_nm has the same properties as the tracer SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA;
however, the inter-parcel mixing was set to zero (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>). Hence, it can be used in comparison to SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA
to study the influence of local mixing between adjacent parcels on the global
AoA distribution.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Evaluation</title>
      <p id="d1e3905">In the previous sections, we described a comprehensively updated version of
the LG tracer transport scheme ATTILA, including a new LG convection scheme
and the option to use a diabatic instead of the standard kinematic vertical
velocity.
In this section, we evaluate ATTILA by comparing the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn and
SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA tracer distributions with observations and with EMAC results,
i.e. from the GP space.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Simulation of ${}^{{222}}$Rn}?><title>Simulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn</title>
      <p id="d1e3943"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.75"/> showed that the EMAC model (version 2.40) is able to
realistically simulate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn distribution. We therefore assume here
that our GP simulation with the EMAC model (now version 2.53) simulates
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn similarly. A comparison with observations will follow in the next
section. The inter-comparison of our new simulations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn between GP
and LG space (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) shows the largest values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn in the northern hemispheric boundary layer (the lowest three model
layers). The large maxima north of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and around 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
are related to surface emissions from the large continents
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). The small local maximum at 80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S is
related to the surface edge of the Antarctic continent, where small land
areas in the land–sea mask generate local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn emissions. In the
boundary layer (north of 40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) the zonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn values for
LG(diab) are smaller than for LG(kin) and GP (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).
In contrast, south of 40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N the LG(diab) results are closer to the GP
simulation. Part of the difference between the GP and the LG simulation is
the uptake of emissions, which depends on the number of LG parcels present in
the lowest model levels (see also Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>) and their relative
horizontal distribution (since the source is only over land). As expected,
over the oceans (the remote regions) the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn values are relatively
small. At 100 hPa in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> the largest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn
values occur in the tropics. Here, GP and LG(diab) simulation results are in
close agreement. LG(kin) simulates smaller values. The differences between
LG(diab) and LG(kin) are<?pagebreak page2000?> related to the different vertical velocity scheme
because this is the only difference between the two LG schemes. In the higher
latitudes the 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level is already in the stratosphere and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn has largely decayed due to its short half-life and the
relatively long transport times in the stratosphere.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4097">Zonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn mixing ratio in the boundary layer (averaged
over the lowest three model layers; dashed line, left vertical axis) and at
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (solid line, right vertical axis). GP denotes the grid-point
simulation with EMAC (black line), LG(diab) the simulation with EMAC–ATTILA
using the diabatic vertical velocity (red line), and LG(kin) the EMAC–ATTILA
simulation with kinematic vertical velocity (light blue
line).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4126">Zonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn mixing ratio between 800 and 1013 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(weighted by the level thickness) over land (dashed) and over sea (solid) for
GP (black line), LG(diab) (red line), and LG(kin) (light blue
line).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>5.1.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Annual cycle of ${}^{{222}}$Rn at the surface layer}?><title>Annual cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn at the surface layer</title>
      <p id="d1e4169">We use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn in situ measurements at the surface layer of 18 stations
distributed worldwide as they were published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.76"/>. The model
results are long-term averages of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn in the surface layer over the
years 1960–2000. They are horizontally linearly interpolated to the
respective location of the observations. Six stations (Crozet, Bermuda,
Amsterdam Island, Kerguelen, Dumont, and Mauna Loa) are far away from the
continents and show the effect of long-range transport (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn lower than
1000 mBq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; STP). A further six stations (Socorro, Cincinnati, Para,
Puy de Dôme, Beijing, and Hohenpeißenberg) are located on continents in
the vicinity of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn sources. Finally, six stations (Gosan,
Hong Kong, Cape Grim, Livermore, Bombay, and Mace Head) are located at coastal
sites influenced by the prevailing wind direction either from the sea or the
continent. A detailed comparison between model results (horizontal axis) and
measurements (vertical axis) is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. A total of 12 monthly
values of the mean annual cycle of GP, LG(diab), and LG(kin) are presented as
data points with different colours for each station. The results are similar
to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.77"><named-content content-type="post">their Fig. 14</named-content></xref>. This cannot be taken for
granted because <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.78"/> used a nudged simulation and a model set-up
with 90 vertical levels, whereas in our study the simulation is free running
and our model set-up has 47 vertical levels. Two stations are for all 12
monthly mean values out of the thick dashed area in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>:
Beijing and Kerguelen (southern Indian Ocean). Beijing's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn values
are too low and the Kerguelen values are too high as simulated with all models.
In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.79"/> the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn values for Kerguelen are not
captured in the simulation. The simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn values are strongly
dependent on the local wind direction at the surface of the measurement
sites, especially for the coast and the remote regions over sea.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4269"> Monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mBq</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">STP</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
surface concentrations: GP and LG model results against observations at
different sites from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.80"/>. The thick dashed lines include a range
within a factor of 2 of the observations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>5.1.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Vertical profiles of ${}^{{222}}$Rn}?><title>Vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn</title>
      <p id="d1e4331">The NARE campaign took place in the vicinity of Nova Scotia and Brunswick,
Canada, in August 1993. Data were sampled over the ocean and over the
continent. We used the simulation data of a climatological mean August
(1960–2000) averaged over the region where the flights took place
(60–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>W and 41–46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N). The triangles in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>
show the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn in the atmosphere for several flights. The thick
dashed curve is a spline interpolation on the grid of all flights. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn mixing ratio decreases with height up to about 3 km and remains
around 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both LG simulation results agree
with the observations and are close to the GP results. The measurements of
the Moffett campaign (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>)<?pagebreak page2001?> show a relatively large scatter of
11 single profiles in the free troposphere. The simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn profiles
in that region were selected as a climatological mean for the months June to
August (1960–2000) and capture the observations quite well. Observed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn emissions are highly variable due to the dependence on the
physical characteristics of the soil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.81"/>. Therefore,
a certain spread between observations and model results is expected and
acceptable.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4427">Vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn mixing ratio
(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the NARE campaign. The thick dashed
line (limited to a height of 6000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a spline interpolation of the
scattered measurement data (triangles) on the grid. Thin dashed lines
represent the one <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation of the respective
simulations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4492">Vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn mixing ratio
(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the Moffett campaign. The thick
dashed line is a spline interpolation of the scattered measurement data
(circles) on the grid.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Age of air</title>
      <p id="d1e4548">The calculation of AoA is performed in two different ways: by a so-called
clock tracer (a linear-in-time increasing tracer like SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) or directly by
a clock on a parcel (LG clock; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>). From a clock tracer,
AoA is calculated indirectly by comparing local tracer mixing ratios with
reference mixing ratios, e.g. the surface mixing ratio in the tropics (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>). This concept is applied in the next section for the
calculation of mean AoA. However, age spectra are calculated directly from
transit times provided by the parcel clocks (e.g. during the transit in the
stratosphere). Conceptually, the calculated AoA differs if it was calculated
by a clock tracer or by clocks. A clock tracer is subject to inter-parcel
mixing, which is not the case for parcel clocks. Therefore, the mean AoA
calculated by the parcel clocks is older than for a clock tracer. However,
AoA from a simulated clock-tracer distribution can be directly compared to
AoA from an observed tracer distribution.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4566">Zonal mean AoA at 20 km of height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the
SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA tracer (red: LG(diab), green: GP, blue: LG(kin)) as a mean over the
years 2000–2010. Thick black line with circles: MIPAS data as a mean over the
years 2003, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. Triangles: AoA from SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
20 km; from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.82"/>. Thin black dashed lines: minimum and maximum AoA
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 20 km; from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.83"/>. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>5.2.1</label><title>Mean age of air</title>
      <p id="d1e4633">Mean AoA in the stratosphere is calculated from the SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA tracer. The
transit time is estimated by comparing the tracer mixing ratio in the
stratosphere with the SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA mixing ratio in the tropical boundary
layer. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows a comparison of SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA at 20 km
of height between the GP, LG(kin), and LG(diab) results along with AoA derived
from satellite observations from MIPAS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.84"/> and in situ
measurements of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.85"/> from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer, as well as from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in situ data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.86"/>. GP and LG(diab) show realistic
distributions of AoA, although slightly lower AoA than the in situ
measurements. MIPAS data are known to overestimate AoA in the polar regions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.87"/>. This is attributed to a known sink of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
upper stratosphere that is not accounted for in our simulations. Noticeably,
the LG(diab) simulation is closer to the observations and LG(kin) shows up
with an age that is too low. For the analysis, we therefore restrict our further
evaluation to LG(diab). The mean age distribution (1960-2010) of LG(diab) is
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. It confirms the well-known characteristics of
the stratospheric<?pagebreak page2002?> Brewer–Dobson circulation with younger air in the tropical
pipe and older air over the poles. Furthermore, the simulated AoA is slightly
older in the whole stratosphere compared to GP (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>), which is most
pronounced near the poles below 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This difference is attributed
to the Eulerian vertical velocity used in the flux-form semi-Lagrangian
transport scheme for the GP simulations, which shows upwelling and downwelling
at different high latitudes that are not related to the net tracer
transport <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.88"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4729">Zonal mean AoA (in years) from the SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA tracer in the LG(diab)
simulation.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e4749">Zonal mean difference of AoA (LG(diab)–GP) from the SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoAc
tracer (with a spatially constant surface source of SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The non-stippled
area is statistically significant to the 99 % level.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e4779">Normalised age spectra (tropics and poles) of the years 2006–2010
between 50 and 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the LG(diab) simulation. The data points
represent the normalised frequency per half-year bin.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e4798">Normalised seasonal age spectrum from LG(diab) simulation of the
years 1990–2010 between 400 and 500 K at
50–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>5.2.2</label><title>Typical age spectra</title>
      <p id="d1e4825">AoA spectra are calculated directly from the clock transit times. These LG
clocks represent the actual time a parcel resides in the stratosphere after
it has crossed the tropopause level. However, these clocks do not “mix their
time” with other parcels. Therefore, the resulting spectrum might differ
from age spectra calculated from so-called AoA “clock tracers”
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.89"/>. Typical age spectra for the tropics
(20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) and the poles (70–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
70–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) between 50 and 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>. The frequency distribution of the LG(diab) simulation
is calculated for every month for the years 1990–2010, binned into 0.5-year
bins, and normalised. We find the largest frequency at a parcel age between 0
and 0.5 years in the tropics and an exponential shape of the spectrum. In
contrast, the modal age is roughly 3 years at the poles. The shape of the
spectrum is Gaussian with a positive skewness. The seasonal age spectra
(selected between 400 and 500 K at 50–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>) show characteristic multiple local maxima along the
time axis. The width of these maxima increases from spring (MAM) and summer (JJA) over autumn (SON) to winter (DJF).
The distance of the maxima on the transit time axis is around 1 year. These
maxima reflect the different contributions of air masses from the tropics and
from high latitudes in the seasonal cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.90"/>. The seasonal age
spectra look qualitatively similar as in Fig. 5 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.91"/>, although
our modal values are about 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> younger. The different modal
values between <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.92"/> and our Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> are probably
a consequence of the utilised concept in calculating the AoA. In LG(diab) we
use our LG clocks to calculate the transit time in the stratosphere directly
if the parcels cross the tropopause level (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>).
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.93"/> calculated their seasonal spectrum from an AoA clock tracer
and the Green's function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.94"/> and relate<?pagebreak page2003?> their stratospheric mixing
ratios to the tracer mixing ratio in the boundary layer to calculate the AoA.
Therefore, the larger modal values in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.95"/> refer to an additional
transit time up to the tropopause level. The effect of these two different
concepts on the calculation of AoA in the lower stratosphere is discussed
further in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS3"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e4925">Zonal mean difference between LG(diab) with standard mixing of
the SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>_AoA tracer and LG(diab) with no mixing (nm) between adjacent parcels.
The non-stippled area is statistically significant to the 99 %
level.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e4945">Zonal mean difference between LG(diab) and LG(diab-nm) with no
inter-parcel mixing. The stippled area is statistically significant to the
99 % level.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>5.2.3</label><title>Sensitivity of age of air to inter-parcel mixing</title>
      <p id="d1e4962">AoA is influenced by the amount of mixing between adjacent parcels.
Inter-parcel mixing can be regarded as a diffusion process leading to a
reduction of local AoA gradients. The effect of inter-parcel mixing makes
stratospheric air generally younger (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>).
Stratospheric AoA without inter-parcel mixing as represented in LG(diab),
described as LG(diabnm), is mostly up to 2.5 months older compared to the AoA
with standard mixing (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>) but slightly younger in
the tropical lower stratosphere, where mixing with upper tropospheric air
becomes important. This “younger air through inter-parcel mixing” should
not be confused with the “ageing by mixing” concept of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.96"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.97"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.98"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.99"/>. They calculate AoA from the
tracer budget equation of AoA and distinguish between the different terms:
tendencies due to the residual stratospheric circulation and the tendencies
of AoA due to eddy mixing and due to turbulent diffusion. Their concept
allows for the separation of the contribution of mixing on the local AoA budget. In
contrast, in our study we simply compare a simulated tracer with mixing to a
tracer distribution without mixing (perturbation concept). Inter-parcel
mixing in the troposphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>) has only a small and
statistically insignificant effect on the simulated AoA because the
troposphere is a well-mixed region where parcels often have contact
with the surface source. The surface is the only region (in the vertical)
where the tracer mixing ratio for the tracer without inter-parcel mixing can
be changed.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e4986">Zonal mean mass fluxes through the 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black),
400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red), and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (green) isentropes. Upward (solid
line) and downward (dashed line) mass flux from the LG(diab) simulation as a mean over
1960–2010.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f14.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e5021">Monthly net mass fluxes from the LG(diab) simulation through the 380 K
isentrope for the northern and southern extratropics.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f15.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2004?><sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Stratosphere–troposphere exchange</title>
      <p id="d1e5039">Stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) is characterised by a global-scale meridional circulation in which mass is transported upward in the
tropics and downward in the extratropics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.100"/>. We use the new
diagnostic submodel LGVFLUX to directly calculate the simulated mass flux
through the tropopause in the LG simulation. The LG(diab) simulation captures
these typical features (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/> as an example for the
mass flux through the 380 K isentropic surface) with a net upward flux in
the tropics between 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and a net downward flux
from 40 to 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and S. Between 30 and 40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and S the
zonal mean net flux is near zero. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/> shows the annual
cycle of the net downward flux through the extratropical 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
isentropic surface with a maximum in boreal winter for 30–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
boreal summer for 30–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The annual amplitude between summer and
winter is about 6–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and falls in the
range given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.101"/> of 6–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e5178">Movement characteristic of parcels transported in the updraft in
1997. The vertical axis describes the start level of a parcel, and the
horizontal axis describes the respective final updraft (end) level. Displayed
are the respective numbers of parcels transported in the updraft, normalised
with the maximum number.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Lagrangian convection statistics</title>
      <p id="d1e5196">The LG convective parcel movement depends on the calculated mass flux profile
(from convection). We analysed the movement of parcels during deep convective
events for the year 1997. The analysis of movement shows that within the
updraft the largest number of parcels leave the boundary layer and are
detrained into the free troposphere up to the tropopause (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>).
The maximum levels of detrainment are between 500 and 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Only a
few parcels start to follow the updraft above the boundary layer (start level
less than 900 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Parcels in the downdraft (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>)
start between 300 and 750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and most parcels are released
into the boundary layer (lowest three model layers). Interestingly, three
height regions seem to preferably be the starting points for the downdraft:
around 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, between 600 and 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and at
850 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The compensating motion in the environment is a movement
over a small distance only. The starting levels for subsidence comprise
nearly the whole troposphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>). The most frequent movement
is one level, but a few parcels are subject to a further downward movement
(right side of the diagonal line). However, because the subsidence of parcels
depends on a local probability (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4"/>), it is
possible that even more parcels subside than originally should. This is then
compensated for in the next iteration by the rise of a parcel (left side of the
diagonal line). This upward movement of parcels adds a certain amount of
unphysical diffusion to the convection that unfortunately cannot be avoided
in this model set-up.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17"><?xmltex \currentcnt{17}?><label>Figure 17</label><caption><p id="d1e5258">Similar to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/> but for parcels transported
in the downdraft in 1997.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f17.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18"><?xmltex \currentcnt{18}?><label>Figure 18</label><caption><p id="d1e5271">Similar to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/> but for parcels representing the
compensating movement in the environment (subsidence) in 1997. Note that
there is also a compensating upward parcel movement (shown below the blue
diagonal line). For details, see the text.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1991/2019/gmd-12-1991-2019-f18.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Summary and outlook</title>
      <p id="d1e5291">In this study we described and evaluated the updated LG tracer transport
scheme ATTILA. ATTILA was extended with an LG convection scheme and a
formulation of diabatic vertical velocity. We implemented a submodel to
describe inter-parcel mixing, which has so far been set up with one parameter for the
troposphere and one for the stratosphere. Moreover, the new
submodel allows us to easily<?pagebreak page2005?> implement more physically sound mixing parameterisations.
New infrastructure submodels which simplify the transformation
between GP and LG space, the provision of random numbers in a parallel
environment, and diagnostic submodels were developed. We performed two
simulations from 1950 to 2010, both resulting in the same meteorological
sequence in GP. The simulations differ only with respect to the vertical
velocity used for the LG model: one with a diabatic LG(diab) and one with the
standard kinematic vertical velocity LG(kin). The annual cycle of the two LG
simulations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn in the surface layer is in accordance with
observations of a large number of stations and of comparable quality with a
former nudged simulation in grid space. Vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn
measured during the NARE and Moffett campaigns agree within an acceptable
spread with our simulations. We expected the largest improvement of our
results with respect to the simulation of AoA in the stratosphere in the
LG(diab) simulation. Indeed, AoA in LG(diab) shows the best agreement with
observations. Moreover, AoA spectra and the troposphere–stratosphere exchange
are realistically simulated in LG(diab).</p>
      <p id="d1e5312">In a next step, we plan to parameterise phase changes of water vapour due to
convection and cloud development on the Lagrangian parcels. Then, ATTILA will
allow us to study convective and large-scale water vapour transport consistently in
convective regions and to assess the convective contribution to
the stratospheric water vapour budget.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5319">The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) is
continuously further developed and applied by a consortium of institutions.
The usage of MESSy and access to the source code is licenced to all
affiliates of institutions which are members of the MESSy Consortium.
Institutions can become a member of the MESSy Consortium by signing the MESSy
Memorandum of Understanding. More information can be found on the MESSy
Consortium Website (<uri>http://www.messy-interface.org</uri>, last access: 6 May 2019). The code presented here is based on
MESSy version 2.53.0 and will be available in the next official release
(version 2.55.0). The data from the simulations will be provided by the
authors on request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5325">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1991-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1991-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5334">SB and PJ did the implementation, performed the simulations, analysed the
results, and wrote the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5340">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5346">The data on the annual cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn at several locations in the
surface layer were kindly provided by Kai Zhang. The data on the vertical
radon profiles are kindly provided by Holger Tost. The simulations were
performed at the Leibniz-Rechenzentrum in Garching, Germany. The data were
analysed with the interactive computer visualisation and analysis environment
ferret. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
within the projects LAWA (Lagrangesche Simulation des globalen
atmospärischen Wasserkreislaufs) under the grant EG 40/24-1, the DFG
Forschergruppe SHARP (Stratospheric Change and its Role for Climate
Prediction), the DLR-Project KliSAW (Klimarelevanz von atmosphärischen
Spurengasen, Aerosolen und Wolken), and the Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft e.V. (HGF)
Project
“Advanced Earth System Modelling Capacity (ESM)”.
We thank Oliver Reitebuch for the internal review of an early version of the
paper.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for
this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by a Research
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5367">This paper was edited by Havala Pye and reviewed by two
anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Andrews et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Andrews, A. E., Boering, K. A., Daube, B. C., Wofsy, S. C., Loewenstein, M.,
Jost, H., Podolske, J. R., Webster, C. R., Herman, R. L., Scott, D. C.,
Flesch, G. J., Moyer, E. J., Elkins, J. W., Dutton, G. S., Hurst, D. F.,
Moore, F. L., Ray, E. A., Romashkin, P. A., and Strahan, S. E.: Mean ages of
stratospheric air derived from in situ observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 32295–32314,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000465</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Appenzeller et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Appenzeller, C., Holton, J. R., and Rosenlof, K. R.: Seasonal variation of
mass transport across the tropopause, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 15071–15078,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD00821" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD00821</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Collins et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, W. J., Derwent, R. G., Johnson, C. E., and Stevenson, D. S.: A
comparison of two schemes for the convective transport of chemical species in
a Lagrangian global chemistry model. Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 128,
991-1009, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Denning et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Denning, A. S., Holzer, M., Gurney, K. R., Heimann, M., Law, R. M., Rayner,
P. J., Fung, I. Y., Fan, S.-M., Taguchi, S., Friedlingstein, P., Balkanski,
Y., Taylor, J., Maiss, M., and Levin, I.: Three-dimensional transport and
concentration of SF6 A model intercomparison study (TransCom 2), Tellus B,
51, 266–297, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Dentener et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Dentener, F., Feichter, J., and Jeuken, A.: Simulation of the transport of Rn
using on-line and off-line global models at different horizontal resolutions:
A detailed comparison with measurements, Tellus B, 51, 573–602,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v51i3.16440" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v51i3.16440</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dietm\"{u}ller et al.(2016)}}?><label>Dietmüller et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Dietmüller, S., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kunze, M., Gellhorn, C.,
Brinkop, S., Frömming, C., Ponater, M., Steil, B., Lauer, A., and
Hendricks, J.: A new radiation infrastructure for the Modular Earth Submodel
System (MESSy, based on version 2.51), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2209–2222,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dietm\"{u}ller et al.(2017)}}?><label>Dietmüller et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Dietmüller, S., Garny, H., Plöger, F., Jöckel, P., and Cai, D.:
Effects of mixing on resolved and unresolved scales on stratospheric age of
air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7703–7719,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7703-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7703-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Engel et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Möbius, T., Bönisch, H., Schmidt, U., Heinz, R., Levin, I.,
Atlas, E., Aoki, S., Nakazawa, T., Sugawara, S., Moore, F., Hurst, D.,
Elkins, J., Schauffler, S., Andrews, A., and Boering, A.: Age of
stratospheric air unchanged within uncertainties over the past 30 years, Nat.
Geosci., 2, 28–31, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Eluszkiewicz et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Eluszkiewicz, J., Hemler, R. S., Mahlman, J. D., Bruhwiler, L., and Takacs,
L. L.: Sensitivity of Age-of-Air Calculations to the Choice of Advection
Scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3185–3201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3185:SOAOAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3185:SOAOAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Erukimova and Bowman(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Erukhimova, T. and Bowman, K. P.: Role of convection in global-scale
transport in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D03105,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Forster et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Forster, C., Stohl, A., and Seibert, P.: Parameterization of convective
transport in a Lagrangian particle dispersion model and its evaluation, J.
Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 403–422, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Garny et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Garny, H., Birner, T., Bönisch, H., and Bunzel, F.: The effects of mixing
on age of air, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 7015–7034,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021417</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Giogetta and Bengtson(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Giorgetta, M. A. and Bengtsson, L.: The potential role of the quasi-biennial
oscillation in the stratosphere-troposphere exchange as found in water vapour
in general circulation model experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6003–6019,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Grewe et al.(2014a)</label><mixed-citation>Grewe, V., Frömming, C., Matthes, S., Brinkop, S., Ponater, M.,
Dietmüller, S., Jöckel, P., Garny, H., Tsati, E., Dahlmann, K.,
Søvde, O. A., Fuglestvedt, J., Berntsen, T. K., Shine, K. P., Irvine, E.
A., Champougny, T., and Hullah, P.: Aircraft routing with minimal climate
impact: the REACT4C climate cost function modelling approach (V1.0), Geosci.
Model Dev., 7, 175–201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-175-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-175-2014</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Grewe et al.(2014b)</label><mixed-citation>
Grewe V., Champougny, T., Matthes, S., Frömming, C., Brinkop, S., Søvde,
A. O., Irvine E. A., and Halscheidt, L.: Reduction of the air traffic's
contribution to climate change: A REACT4C case study, Atmos. Environ., 94
616–625, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Gupta et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Gupta, M. L., Douglass, A. R., Kawa, S. R., and Pawson, S.: Use of radon for
evaluation of atmospheric transport models: sensitivity to emissions, Tellus
B, 56, 404–412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00124.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00124.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Haenel et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Haenel, F. J., Stiller, G. P., von Clarmann, T., Funke, B., Eckert, E.,
Glatthor, N., Grabowski, U., Kellmann, S., Kiefer, M., Linden, A., and
Reddmann, T.: Reassessment of MIPAS age of air trends and variability, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 13161–13176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13161-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13161-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Hall and Plumb(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, T. M. and Plumb, R. A.: Age as a diagnostic of stratospheric transport,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 1059–1070, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Haramoto et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Haramoto, H., Matsumoto, M., Nishimura, T., Panneton, F., and L'Ecuyer, P.:
Efficient Jump Ahead for F2-Linear Random Number Generators, INFORMS J.
Comput., 20, 385–390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1070.0251" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1287/ijoc.1070.0251</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Holton et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Holton, J. R., Haynes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Rood, R. B.,
and Pfister, L.: Stratosphere-troposphere exchange, Rev. Geophys., 33,
403–439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95RG02097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95RG02097</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Hoppe et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Hoppe, C. M., Hoffmann, L., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Ploeger, F.,
Günther, G., Jöckel, P., and Müller, R.: The implementation of
the CLaMS Lagrangian transport core into the chemistry climate model EMAC
2.40.1: application on age of air and transport of long-lived trace species,
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2639–2651, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2639-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-2639-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Hoppe et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Hoppe, C. M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., and Müller, R.: Kinematic and
diabatic vertical velocity climatologies from a chemistry climate model,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6223–6239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6223-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-6223-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Jacob et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Jacob, D. J., Prather, M. J., Rasch, P. J., Shia, R.-L., Balkanski, Y. J.,
Beagley, S. R., Bergmann, D. J., Blackshear, W. T., Brown, M., Chiba, M.,
Chipperfield, M. P., de Grandpré, J., Dignon, J. E., Feichter, J.,
Genthon, C., Grose, W. L., Kasibhatla, P. S., Köhler, I., Kritz, M. A.,
Law, K., Penner, J. E., Ramonet, M., Reeves, C. E., Rotman, D. A., Stockwell,
D. Z., Van Velthoven, P. F. J., Verver, G., Wild, O., Yang, H., Zimmermann,
P.: Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models
using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn and other short-lived tracers, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
5953–5970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02955" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD02955</ext-link> 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>James(1994)</label><mixed-citation>James, F.: RANLUX: A Fortran implementation of the high-quality pseudorandom
number generator of Lüscher, Comput. Phys. Commun., 79, 111–114,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(94)90233-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0010-4655(94)90233-X</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{J\"{o}ckel et al.(2005)}}?><label>Jöckel et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Tost, H., and Lelieveld, J.:
Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) – a new approach
towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433–444,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-433-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-433-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{J\"{o}ckel et al.(2006)}}?><label>Jöckel et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Brühl, C., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld,
L., Hoor, P., Kerkweg, A., Lawrence, M. G., Sander, R., Steil, B., Stiller,
G., Tanarhte, M., Taraborrelli, D., van Aardenne, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The
atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent
simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
6, 5067–5104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5067-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5067-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{J{\"{o}}ckel et al.(2008)}}?><label>Jöckel et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Buchholz-Dietsch, J., Tost, H., Sander, R., and
Pozzer, A.: Technical Note: Coupling of chemical processes with the Modular
Earth Submodel System (MESSy) submodel TRACER, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
1677–1687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1677-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1677-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{J\"{o}ckel et al.(2010)}}?><label>Jöckel et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H.,
Baumgaertner, A., Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the
Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{J\"{o}ckel et al.(2016)}}?><label>Jöckel et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer,
C. A. M., Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F.,
Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B.,
Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S., Neumaier, M., Nützel, M.,
Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R., Scharffe, D., and
Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the
Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev., 9,
1153–1200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Karstens et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Karstens, U., Schwingshackl, C., Schmithüsen, D., and Levin, I.: A
process-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>radon flux map for Europe and its comparison to
long-term observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12845–12865,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12845-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12845-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kerkweg et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Kerkweg, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical note:
Implementation of prescribed (OFFLEM), calculated (ONLEM),<?pagebreak page2007?> and
pseudo-emissions (TNUDGE) of chemical species in the Modular Earth Submodel
System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3603–3609,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3603-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3603-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Konopka et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Steinhorst, H.-M., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G.,
Müller, R., Elkins, J. W., Jost, H.-J., Richard, E., Schmidt, U., Toon,
G., and McKenna, D. S.: Mixing and ozone loss in the 1999-2000 Arctic vortex:
Simulations with the 3-dimensional Chemical Lagrangian Model of the
Stratosphere (CLaMS), J. Geophys. Res., 109, D02315,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003792" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003792</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Konopka et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Ploeger, F., Tao, M., Birner, T., and Riese, M.: Hemispheric
asymmetries and seasonality of mean age of air in the lower stratosphere:
Deep versus shallow branch of the Brewer-Dobson circulation, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 2053–2066, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022429." ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022429.</ext-link> 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Konopka et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Tao, M., Ploeger, F., Diallo, M., and Riese, M.: Tropospheric
mixing and parametrization of unresolved convection as implemented into the
Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), Geosci. Model Dev.
Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-165" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-2018-165</ext-link>, in review, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kritz et al. (1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Kritz, M. A., Rosner S. W., and Stockwell, D. Z.: Validation of an off-line
three-dimensional chemical transport model using observed radon profiles, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 8425–8432, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Lin and Rood(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, S.-J. and Rood, R.: Multi-dimensional flux-form semi- Lagrangian
transport schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{L\"{u}scher(1994)}}?><label>Lüscher(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Lüscher, M.: A portable high-quality random number generator for lattice
field theory simulations, Comput. Phys. Commun., 79, 100–110,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(94)90232-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0010-4655(94)90232-1</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Mahowald et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Mahowald, N. M., Rasch, P. J., and Prinn, R. G.: Cumulus parameterizations in
chemical transport models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 26173–26189, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Matsumoto and Nishimura(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, M. and Nishimura, T.: Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally
equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator, ACM Trans. Model.
Comput. Simul., 8, 3–30, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Mahowald et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N. M., Rasch, P. J., Eaton, B. E., Whittlestone, S., Prinn, R. G.:
Transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>radon to the remote troposphere using the model of
atmospheric transport and chemistry and assimilated winds from ECMWF and the
National Center for Environmental Prediction NCAR, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
102, 28139–28151, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>McKenna et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>McKenna, D. S., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R.,
Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.: A new Chemical Lagrangian Model
of the Stratosphere (CLaMS): 1. Formulation of advection and mixing, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, 4309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000114</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Nissen et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Nissen, K. M., Matthes, K., Langematz, U., and Mayer, B.: Towards a better
representation of the solar cycle in general circulation models, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 5391–5400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5391-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5391-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Nordeng(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Nordeng, T. E.: Extended versions of the convection parametrization scheme at
ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the
tropics, ECMWF Tech. Memo. 206, Eur. Cent for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts,
Reading, UK, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Ploeger et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Günther, G., Grooß, J.-U., and Müller, R.:
Impact of the vertical velocity scheme on modeling transport in the tropical
tropopause layer, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D03301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012023</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Ploeger et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Riese, M., Haenel, F., Konopka, P., Müller, R., and Stiller,
G.: Variability of stratospheric mean age of air and of the local effects of
residual circulation and eddy mixing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 716–733,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022468" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022468</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Ploeger et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Riese, M., Haenel, F., Konopka, P., Müller, R., and Stiller,
G.: Variability of stratospheric mean age of air and of the local effects of
residual circulation and eddy mixing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 716–733,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022468" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022468</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Ploeger and Birner(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F. and Birner, T.: Seasonal and inter-annual variability of lower
stratospheric age of air spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10195–10213,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10195-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10195-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Rayner et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Rayner, N. A., Parker, D. E., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L.
V., Rowell, D. P., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global Analyses of sea
surface temperatures, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the
late nineteenth century, J. Geophys.Res., 108, 4407,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002670</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Reithmeier and Sausen(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Reithmeier, C. and Sausen, R.: ATTILA: Atmospheric Tracer Transport in a
Lagrangian Model, Tellus B, 54, 278–299, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Reithmeier et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Reithmeier, C., Sausen, R., and Grewe, V.: Investigating lower stratospheric
model transport: Lagrangian calculations of mean age and age spectra in the
GCM ECHAM4, Clim. Dynam. 30, 225–239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0294-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-007-0294-1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Riese et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Riese, M., Ploeger, F., Rap, A., Vogel, B., Konopka, P., Dameris, M., and
Forster, P.: Impact of uncertainties in atmospheric mixing on simulated UTLS
composition and related radiative effects, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017751</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Roeckner et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh,
L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of simulated
climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere model,
J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Rolinski et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Rolinski, S., Müller, C., Heinke, J., Weindl, I., Biewald, A., Bodirsky,
B. L., Bondeau, A., Boons-Prins, E. R., Bouwman, A. F., Leffelaar, P. A., te
Roller, J. A., Schaphoff, S., and Thonicke, K.: Modeling vegetation and
carbon dynamics of managed grasslands at the global scale with LPJmL 3.6,
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 429–451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-429-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-429-2018</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Sander et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Sander, R., Jöckel, P., Kirner, O., Kunert, A. T., Landgraf, J., and
Pozzer, A.: The photolysis module JVAL-14, compatible with the MESSy
standard, and the JVal PreProcessor (JVPP), Geosci. Model Dev., 7,
2653–2662, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2653-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-2653-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Schoeberl et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Schoeberl, M. R., Douglass, A. R., Polansky, B., Boone, C., Walker, K. A.,
and Bernath, P.: Estimation of stratospheric age spectrum from chemical
tracers, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006125</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Seibert et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Seibert, P., Krüger, B., and Frank, A.: Parametrisation of convective
mixing in a Lagrangian particle dispersion model, in: Proceedings of the 5th
GLOREAM Workshop, Wengen, Switzerland, 24–26 September2001, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Stapf(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Stapf, B.: Lagrangesche Behandlung der Konvektion, Thesis (Diploma), FH
Regensburg, Germany, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2008?><ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Stenke and Grewe(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Stenke, A. and Grewe, V.: Simulation of stratospheric water vapor trends:
impact on stratospheric ozone chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1257–1272,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1257-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1257-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Stenke et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Stenke, A., Grewe, V., and Ponater, M.: Lagrangian transport of water vapor
and cloud water in the ECHAM4 GCM and its impact on the cold bias, Clim.
Dynam., 31, 491–506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0347-5." ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-007-0347-5.</ext-link> 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Stiller et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Stiller, G. P., von Clarmann, T., Haenel, F., Funke, B., Glatthor, N.,
Grabowski, U., Kellmann, S., Kiefer, M., Linden, A., Lossow, S., and
López-Puertas, M.: Observed temporal evolution of global mean age of
stratospheric air for the 2002 to 2010 period, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
3311–3331, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3311-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3311-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Stohl et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Hittenberger, M., and Wotawa, G.: Validation of the Lagrangian
particle dispersion model FLEXPART against large-scale tracer experimant
data, Atmos. Environ., 32, 4245–4264, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Stohl et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical
note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Tao(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Tao, M.: Atmospheric Mixing in a Lagrangian Framework, Dissertation,
Schriften des Forschungzentrums Jülich, Reihe Energy and Environment, Vol.
320, available at:
<uri>http://elpub.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/edocs/dokumente/fbc/physik/diss2016/tao/dc1612.pdf</uri>
(last access: 29 April 2019), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Tiedtke(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in
large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800, 1989.  </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Tost et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Influence of different
convection parameterisations in a GCM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5475–5493,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5475-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5475-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Tost(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Tost, H.: Global Modelling of Cloud, Convection and Precipitation Influences
on Trace Gases and Aerosols, University of Bonn, Germany, available at:
<uri>http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss_online/math_nat_fak/2006/tost_holger</uri>
(last access: 29 April 2019), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Waugh and Hall(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Waugh, D. W. and Hall, T. M.: Age of stratospheric air: Theory, observations,
and models, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000RG000101</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Zaucker et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Zaucker, F., Daum, P., Wetterauer, U., Beikowitz, C., Kromer, B., and
Broecker, W.: Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn measurements during the 1993 NARE
Intensive, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 29149–29164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD02029</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Zhang et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K., Wan, H., Zhang, M., and Wang, B.: Evaluation of the atmospheric
transport in a GCM using radon measurements: sensitivity to cumulus
convection parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2811–2832,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2811-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2811-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>ATTILA 4.0: Lagrangian advective and convective transport of passive tracers within the ECHAM5/MESSy (2.53.0) chemistry–climate model</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>We have extended ATTILA (Atmospheric Tracer Transport in a LAgrangian model),
a Lagrangian tracer transport scheme, which is online coupled to the global
ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) model, with a combination of newly
developed and modified physical routines and new diagnostic and
infrastructure submodels. The new physical routines comprise a
parameterisation for Lagrangian convection, a formulation of diabatic
vertical velocity, and the new grid-point submodel LGTMIX to calculate the
mixing of compounds in Lagrangian representation. The new infrastructure
routines simplify the transformation between grid-point (GP) and Lagrangian
(LG) space in a parallel computing environment. The new submodel LGVFLUX is a
useful diagnostic tool to calculate online vertical mass fluxes through
horizontal surfaces. The submodel DRADON was extended to account for
emissions and changes of <sup>222</sup>Rn on Lagrangian parcels. To evaluate the
new physical routines, two simulations in free-running mode with prescribed
sea surface temperatures were performed with EMAC–ATTILA in T42L47MA
resolution from 1950 to 2010. The results show an improvement of the tracer
transport into and within the stratosphere when the diabatic vertical
velocity is used for vertical advection in ATTILA instead of the standard
kinematic vertical velocity. In particular, the age-of-air distribution is
more in
accordance with observations. The global tropospheric distribution of
<sup>222</sup>Rn, however, is simulated in agreement with available observations
and with the results from EMAC in grid space for both Lagrangian systems.
Additional sensitivity studies reveal an effect of inter-parcel mixing on the
age of air in the tropopause region and the stratosphere, but there is no
significant effect for the troposphere.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Andrews et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, A. E., Boering, K. A., Daube, B. C., Wofsy, S. C., Loewenstein, M.,
Jost, H., Podolske, J. R., Webster, C. R., Herman, R. L., Scott, D. C.,
Flesch, G. J., Moyer, E. J., Elkins, J. W., Dutton, G. S., Hurst, D. F.,
Moore, F. L., Ray, E. A., Romashkin, P. A., and Strahan, S. E.: Mean ages of
stratospheric air derived from in situ observations of CO<sub>2</sub>,
CH<sub>4</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 32295–32314,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000465" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000465</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Appenzeller et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Appenzeller, C., Holton, J. R., and Rosenlof, K. R.: Seasonal variation of
mass transport across the tropopause, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 15071–15078,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD00821" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD00821</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Collins et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, W. J., Derwent, R. G., Johnson, C. E., and Stevenson, D. S.: A
comparison of two schemes for the convective transport of chemical species in
a Lagrangian global chemistry model. Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 128,
991-1009, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Denning et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Denning, A. S., Holzer, M., Gurney, K. R., Heimann, M., Law, R. M., Rayner,
P. J., Fung, I. Y., Fan, S.-M., Taguchi, S., Friedlingstein, P., Balkanski,
Y., Taylor, J., Maiss, M., and Levin, I.: Three-dimensional transport and
concentration of SF6 A model intercomparison study (TransCom 2), Tellus B,
51, 266–297, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Dentener et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Dentener, F., Feichter, J., and Jeuken, A.: Simulation of the transport of Rn
using on-line and off-line global models at different horizontal resolutions:
A detailed comparison with measurements, Tellus B, 51, 573–602,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v51i3.16440" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v51i3.16440</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Dietmüller et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Dietmüller, S., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kunze, M., Gellhorn, C.,
Brinkop, S., Frömming, C., Ponater, M., Steil, B., Lauer, A., and
Hendricks, J.: A new radiation infrastructure for the Modular Earth Submodel
System (MESSy, based on version 2.51), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2209–2222,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Dietmüller et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Dietmüller, S., Garny, H., Plöger, F., Jöckel, P., and Cai, D.:
Effects of mixing on resolved and unresolved scales on stratospheric age of
air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7703–7719,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7703-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7703-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Engel et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Möbius, T., Bönisch, H., Schmidt, U., Heinz, R., Levin, I.,
Atlas, E., Aoki, S., Nakazawa, T., Sugawara, S., Moore, F., Hurst, D.,
Elkins, J., Schauffler, S., Andrews, A., and Boering, A.: Age of
stratospheric air unchanged within uncertainties over the past 30 years, Nat.
Geosci., 2, 28–31, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Eluszkiewicz et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Eluszkiewicz, J., Hemler, R. S., Mahlman, J. D., Bruhwiler, L., and Takacs,
L. L.: Sensitivity of Age-of-Air Calculations to the Choice of Advection
Scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3185–3201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3185:SOAOAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3185:SOAOAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Erukimova and Bowman(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Erukhimova, T. and Bowman, K. P.: Role of convection in global-scale
transport in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D03105,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Forster et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Forster, C., Stohl, A., and Seibert, P.: Parameterization of convective
transport in a Lagrangian particle dispersion model and its evaluation, J.
Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 403–422, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Garny et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Garny, H., Birner, T., Bönisch, H., and Bunzel, F.: The effects of mixing
on age of air, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 7015–7034,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021417" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021417</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Giogetta and Bengtson(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Giorgetta, M. A. and Bengtsson, L.: The potential role of the quasi-biennial
oscillation in the stratosphere-troposphere exchange as found in water vapour
in general circulation model experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6003–6019,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Grewe et al.(2014a)</label><mixed-citation>
Grewe, V., Frömming, C., Matthes, S., Brinkop, S., Ponater, M.,
Dietmüller, S., Jöckel, P., Garny, H., Tsati, E., Dahlmann, K.,
Søvde, O. A., Fuglestvedt, J., Berntsen, T. K., Shine, K. P., Irvine, E.
A., Champougny, T., and Hullah, P.: Aircraft routing with minimal climate
impact: the REACT4C climate cost function modelling approach (V1.0), Geosci.
Model Dev., 7, 175–201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-175-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-175-2014</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Grewe et al.(2014b)</label><mixed-citation>
Grewe V., Champougny, T., Matthes, S., Frömming, C., Brinkop, S., Søvde,
A. O., Irvine E. A., and Halscheidt, L.: Reduction of the air traffic's
contribution to climate change: A REACT4C case study, Atmos. Environ., 94
616–625, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Gupta et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Gupta, M. L., Douglass, A. R., Kawa, S. R., and Pawson, S.: Use of radon for
evaluation of atmospheric transport models: sensitivity to emissions, Tellus
B, 56, 404–412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00124.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00124.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Haenel et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Haenel, F. J., Stiller, G. P., von Clarmann, T., Funke, B., Eckert, E.,
Glatthor, N., Grabowski, U., Kellmann, S., Kiefer, M., Linden, A., and
Reddmann, T.: Reassessment of MIPAS age of air trends and variability, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 15, 13161–13176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13161-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13161-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Hall and Plumb(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, T. M. and Plumb, R. A.: Age as a diagnostic of stratospheric transport,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 1059–1070, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Haramoto et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Haramoto, H., Matsumoto, M., Nishimura, T., Panneton, F., and L'Ecuyer, P.:
Efficient Jump Ahead for F2-Linear Random Number Generators, INFORMS J.
Comput., 20, 385–390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1070.0251" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1070.0251</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Holton et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Holton, J. R., Haynes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Rood, R. B.,
and Pfister, L.: Stratosphere-troposphere exchange, Rev. Geophys., 33,
403–439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95RG02097" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95RG02097</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hoppe et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoppe, C. M., Hoffmann, L., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Ploeger, F.,
Günther, G., Jöckel, P., and Müller, R.: The implementation of
the CLaMS Lagrangian transport core into the chemistry climate model EMAC
2.40.1: application on age of air and transport of long-lived trace species,
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2639–2651, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2639-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2639-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Hoppe et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoppe, C. M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., and Müller, R.: Kinematic and
diabatic vertical velocity climatologies from a chemistry climate model,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6223–6239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6223-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6223-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Jacob et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, D. J., Prather, M. J., Rasch, P. J., Shia, R.-L., Balkanski, Y. J.,
Beagley, S. R., Bergmann, D. J., Blackshear, W. T., Brown, M., Chiba, M.,
Chipperfield, M. P., de Grandpré, J., Dignon, J. E., Feichter, J.,
Genthon, C., Grose, W. L., Kasibhatla, P. S., Köhler, I., Kritz, M. A.,
Law, K., Penner, J. E., Ramonet, M., Reeves, C. E., Rotman, D. A., Stockwell,
D. Z., Van Velthoven, P. F. J., Verver, G., Wild, O., Yang, H., Zimmermann,
P.: Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models
using <sup>222</sup>Rn and other short-lived tracers, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
5953–5970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02955" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02955</a> 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>James(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
James, F.: RANLUX: A Fortran implementation of the high-quality pseudorandom
number generator of Lüscher, Comput. Phys. Commun., 79, 111–114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(94)90233-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(94)90233-X</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Jöckel et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Jöckel, P., Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Tost, H., and Lelieveld, J.:
Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) – a new approach
towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433–444,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-433-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-433-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Jöckel et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Brühl, C., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld,
L., Hoor, P., Kerkweg, A., Lawrence, M. G., Sander, R., Steil, B., Stiller,
G., Tanarhte, M., Taraborrelli, D., van Aardenne, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The
atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent
simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
6, 5067–5104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5067-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5067-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Jöckel et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Buchholz-Dietsch, J., Tost, H., Sander, R., and
Pozzer, A.: Technical Note: Coupling of chemical processes with the Modular
Earth Submodel System (MESSy) submodel TRACER, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
1677–1687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1677-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1677-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Jöckel et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H.,
Baumgaertner, A., Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the
Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Jöckel et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer,
C. A. M., Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F.,
Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B.,
Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S., Neumaier, M., Nützel, M.,
Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R., Scharffe, D., and
Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the
Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev., 9,
1153–1200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Karstens et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Karstens, U., Schwingshackl, C., Schmithüsen, D., and Levin, I.: A
process-based <sup>222</sup>radon flux map for Europe and its comparison to
long-term observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12845–12865,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12845-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12845-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Kerkweg et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Kerkweg, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical note:
Implementation of prescribed (OFFLEM), calculated (ONLEM), and
pseudo-emissions (TNUDGE) of chemical species in the Modular Earth Submodel
System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3603–3609,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3603-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3603-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Konopka et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Konopka, P., Steinhorst, H.-M., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G.,
Müller, R., Elkins, J. W., Jost, H.-J., Richard, E., Schmidt, U., Toon,
G., and McKenna, D. S.: Mixing and ozone loss in the 1999-2000 Arctic vortex:
Simulations with the 3-dimensional Chemical Lagrangian Model of the
Stratosphere (CLaMS), J. Geophys. Res., 109, D02315,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003792" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003792</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Konopka et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Konopka, P., Ploeger, F., Tao, M., Birner, T., and Riese, M.: Hemispheric
asymmetries and seasonality of mean age of air in the lower stratosphere:
Deep versus shallow branch of the Brewer-Dobson circulation, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 120, 2053–2066, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022429." target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022429.</a> 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Konopka et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Konopka, P., Tao, M., Ploeger, F., Diallo, M., and Riese, M.: Tropospheric
mixing and parametrization of unresolved convection as implemented into the
Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), Geosci. Model Dev.
Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-165" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-165</a>, in review, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kritz et al. (1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Kritz, M. A., Rosner S. W., and Stockwell, D. Z.: Validation of an off-line
three-dimensional chemical transport model using observed radon profiles, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 8425–8432, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Lin and Rood(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, S.-J. and Rood, R.: Multi-dimensional flux-form semi- Lagrangian
transport schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Lüscher(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Lüscher, M.: A portable high-quality random number generator for lattice
field theory simulations, Comput. Phys. Commun., 79, 100–110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(94)90232-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(94)90232-1</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Mahowald et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Mahowald, N. M., Rasch, P. J., and Prinn, R. G.: Cumulus parameterizations in
chemical transport models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 26173–26189, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Matsumoto and Nishimura(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, M. and Nishimura, T.: Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally
equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator, ACM Trans. Model.
Comput. Simul., 8, 3–30, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Mahowald et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Mahowald, N. M., Rasch, P. J., Eaton, B. E., Whittlestone, S., Prinn, R. G.:
Transport of <sup>222</sup>radon to the remote troposphere using the model of
atmospheric transport and chemistry and assimilated winds from ECMWF and the
National Center for Environmental Prediction NCAR, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
102, 28139–28151, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>McKenna et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
McKenna, D. S., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R.,
Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.: A new Chemical Lagrangian Model
of the Stratosphere (CLaMS): 1. Formulation of advection and mixing, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, 4309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Nissen et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Nissen, K. M., Matthes, K., Langematz, U., and Mayer, B.: Towards a better
representation of the solar cycle in general circulation models, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 7, 5391–5400, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5391-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5391-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Nordeng(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Nordeng, T. E.: Extended versions of the convection parametrization scheme at
ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the
tropics, ECMWF Tech. Memo. 206, Eur. Cent for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts,
Reading, UK, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Ploeger et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Günther, G., Grooß, J.-U., and Müller, R.:
Impact of the vertical velocity scheme on modeling transport in the tropical
tropopause layer, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D03301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012023</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Ploeger et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Riese, M., Haenel, F., Konopka, P., Müller, R., and Stiller,
G.: Variability of stratospheric mean age of air and of the local effects of
residual circulation and eddy mixing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 716–733,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022468" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022468</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Ploeger et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F., Riese, M., Haenel, F., Konopka, P., Müller, R., and Stiller,
G.: Variability of stratospheric mean age of air and of the local effects of
residual circulation and eddy mixing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 716–733,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022468" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022468</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Ploeger and Birner(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Ploeger, F. and Birner, T.: Seasonal and inter-annual variability of lower
stratospheric age of air spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10195–10213,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10195-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10195-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Rayner et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Rayner, N. A., Parker, D. E., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L.
V., Rowell, D. P., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global Analyses of sea
surface temperatures, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the
late nineteenth century, J. Geophys.Res., 108, 4407,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Reithmeier and Sausen(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Reithmeier, C. and Sausen, R.: ATTILA: Atmospheric Tracer Transport in a
Lagrangian Model, Tellus B, 54, 278–299, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Reithmeier et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Reithmeier, C., Sausen, R., and Grewe, V.: Investigating lower stratospheric
model transport: Lagrangian calculations of mean age and age spectra in the
GCM ECHAM4, Clim. Dynam. 30, 225–239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0294-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0294-1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Riese et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Riese, M., Ploeger, F., Rap, A., Vogel, B., Konopka, P., Dameris, M., and
Forster, P.: Impact of uncertainties in atmospheric mixing on simulated UTLS
composition and related radiative effects, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017751</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Roeckner et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh,
L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of simulated
climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere model,
J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Rolinski et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Rolinski, S., Müller, C., Heinke, J., Weindl, I., Biewald, A., Bodirsky,
B. L., Bondeau, A., Boons-Prins, E. R., Bouwman, A. F., Leffelaar, P. A., te
Roller, J. A., Schaphoff, S., and Thonicke, K.: Modeling vegetation and
carbon dynamics of managed grasslands at the global scale with LPJmL 3.6,
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 429–451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-429-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-429-2018</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Sander et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Sander, R., Jöckel, P., Kirner, O., Kunert, A. T., Landgraf, J., and
Pozzer, A.: The photolysis module JVAL-14, compatible with the MESSy
standard, and the JVal PreProcessor (JVPP), Geosci. Model Dev., 7,
2653–2662, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2653-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2653-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Schoeberl et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Schoeberl, M. R., Douglass, A. R., Polansky, B., Boone, C., Walker, K. A.,
and Bernath, P.: Estimation of stratospheric age spectrum from chemical
tracers, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006125" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006125</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Seibert et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Seibert, P., Krüger, B., and Frank, A.: Parametrisation of convective
mixing in a Lagrangian particle dispersion model, in: Proceedings of the 5th
GLOREAM Workshop, Wengen, Switzerland, 24–26 September2001, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Stapf(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Stapf, B.: Lagrangesche Behandlung der Konvektion, Thesis (Diploma), FH
Regensburg, Germany, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Stenke and Grewe(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Stenke, A. and Grewe, V.: Simulation of stratospheric water vapor trends:
impact on stratospheric ozone chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1257–1272,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1257-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1257-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Stenke et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Stenke, A., Grewe, V., and Ponater, M.: Lagrangian transport of water vapor
and cloud water in the ECHAM4 GCM and its impact on the cold bias, Clim.
Dynam., 31, 491–506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0347-5." target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0347-5.</a> 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Stiller et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Stiller, G. P., von Clarmann, T., Haenel, F., Funke, B., Glatthor, N.,
Grabowski, U., Kellmann, S., Kiefer, M., Linden, A., Lossow, S., and
López-Puertas, M.: Observed temporal evolution of global mean age of
stratospheric air for the 2002 to 2010 period, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
3311–3331, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3311-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3311-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Stohl et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Hittenberger, M., and Wotawa, G.: Validation of the Lagrangian
particle dispersion model FLEXPART against large-scale tracer experimant
data, Atmos. Environ., 32, 4245–4264, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Stohl et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical
note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Tao(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, M.: Atmospheric Mixing in a Lagrangian Framework, Dissertation,
Schriften des Forschungzentrums Jülich, Reihe Energy and Environment, Vol.
320, available at:
<a href="http://elpub.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/edocs/dokumente/fbc/physik/diss2016/tao/dc1612.pdf" target="_blank">http://elpub.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/edocs/dokumente/fbc/physik/diss2016/tao/dc1612.pdf</a>
(last access: 29 April 2019), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Tiedtke(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in
large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800, 1989. 
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Tost et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Influence of different
convection parameterisations in a GCM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5475–5493,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5475-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5475-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Tost(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Tost, H.: Global Modelling of Cloud, Convection and Precipitation Influences
on Trace Gases and Aerosols, University of Bonn, Germany, available at:
<a href="http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss_online/math_nat_fak/2006/tost_holger" target="_blank">http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss_online/math_nat_fak/2006/tost_holger</a>
(last access: 29 April 2019), 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Waugh and Hall(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Waugh, D. W. and Hall, T. M.: Age of stratospheric air: Theory, observations,
and models, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG000101</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Zaucker et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Zaucker, F., Daum, P., Wetterauer, U., Beikowitz, C., Kromer, B., and
Broecker, W.: Atmospheric <sup>222</sup>Rn measurements during the 1993 NARE
Intensive, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 29149–29164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02029</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Zhang et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, K., Wan, H., Zhang, M., and Wang, B.: Evaluation of the atmospheric
transport in a GCM using radon measurements: sensitivity to cumulus
convection parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2811–2832,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2811-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2811-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
