<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GMD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Geoscientific Model Development</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GMD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Model Dev.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1991-9603</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gmd-10-433-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>MACv2-SP: a parameterization of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated Twomey effect for use in CMIP6</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Parameterization of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B.~Stevens et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Stevens</surname><given-names>Bjorn</given-names></name>
          <email>bjorn.stevens@mpimet.mpg.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3795-0475</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fiedler</surname><given-names>Stephanie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-9949</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kinne</surname><given-names>Stefan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Peters</surname><given-names>Karsten</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-2957</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rast</surname><given-names>Sebastian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Müsse</surname><given-names>Jobst</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>Steven J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3248-5607</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mauritsen</surname><given-names>Thorsten</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, College Park, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Bjorn Stevens (bjorn.stevens@mpimet.mpg.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>433</fpage><lpage>452</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017.html">This article is available from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>A simple plume implementation of the second version (v2) of the Max Planck
Institute Aerosol Climatology, MACv2-SP, is described. MACv2-SP provides a
prescription of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated
Twomey effect. It was created to provide a harmonized description of
post-1850 anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing for climate modeling
studies. MACv2-SP has been designed to be easy to implement, change and use,
and thereby enable studies exploring the climatic effects of different
patterns of aerosol radiative forcing, including a Twomey effect. MACv2-SP is
formulated in terms of nine spatial plumes associated with different major
anthropogenic source regions. The shape of the plumes is fit to the Max
Planck Institute Aerosol Climatology, version 2, whose present-day (2005)
distribution is anchored by surface-based observations. Two types of plumes
are considered: one predominantly associated with biomass burning, the other
with industrial emissions. These differ in the prescription of their annual
cycle and in their optical properties, thereby implicitly accounting for
different contributions of absorbing aerosol to the different plumes. A
Twomey effect for each plume is prescribed as a change in the host model's
background cloud-droplet population density using relationships derived from
satellite data. Year-to-year variations in the amplitude of the plumes over
the historical period (1850–2016) are derived by scaling the plumes with
associated national emission sources of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Experiments using
MACv2-SP are performed with the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model. The
globally and annually averaged instantaneous and effective aerosol radiative
forcings are estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.
Forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions (the Twomey effect) offsets the
reduction of clear-sky forcing by clouds, so that the net effect of clouds on
the aerosol forcing is small; hence, the clear-sky forcing, which is more
readily measurable, provides a good estimate of the total aerosol forcing.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Attempts to understand how the anthropogenic aerosol affects the climate
system have tended to focus on the quantification of its radiative forcing.
One way to do this is to characterize the physical properties of the aerosol
given knowledge of aerosol and aerosol precursor emissions. Given the aerosol
physical properties, optical and cloud active properties can be inferred and
used to quantify aerosol radiative forcing. This bottom-up approach has
proven to be challenging. One reason is that important aerosol processes
remain poorly understood <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.1"/>. Another
reason is the enormous scale divide between the processes that are understood
and those that can be represented with fidelity in a
large-scale model. Even processes that are well understood prove difficult to
implement consistently <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. From this
perspective, it is not surprising that independent efforts adopting bottom-up
approaches yield estimates of aerosol radiative forcing that differ widely
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.3"/>.</p>
      <p>Rather than asking how our understanding of aerosol processes constrains
aerosol radiative forcing, a top-down approach asks how the response to a
given distribution of aerosol optical and cloud active properties is
consistent with the observational record. Present bounds on aerosol radiative
forcing are largely a result of such approaches
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.4"/>. The goal of the paper is to describe a
simple and easy-to-implement aerosol climatology that we have developed to
help advance the top-down approach for constraining aerosol radiative
forcing.</p>
      <p>The idea of using the response of the climate system to a hypothetical
(aerosol) forcing as a test of that forcing is at the heart of detection and
attribution studies, and presupposes some understanding of the pattern of
aerosol forcing and the pattern of the response. For instance, it has been
argued that a strong aerosol forcing, which would have been disproportionally
concentrated around the source regions in the Northern Hemisphere, is
inconsistent with the strong pattern of Northern Hemisphere warming through
the first part of the last century <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.5"/>. But this argument
assumes that warming in the Northern Hemisphere, especially in the Atlantic
sector, could not have been as large as the warming observed if the net radiative
forcing over the hemisphere, or region, was negative. This need not be the
case, as enthalpy may have been imported into the region at a rate that more
than offsets the local negative forcing. To test the idea, it would be helpful
to see if robust climate responses can be attributed to patterns of aerosol
forcing, for which the ability to prescribe the same pattern of forcing
across many climate models is a prerequisite.</p>
      <p>Given that the 20th century witnessed a large human imprint on the
atmospheric aerosol, it seems natural to ask what was different about the
climate of the 20th century due to this anthropogenic aerosol. Published
studies, usually based on the response of an individual model, hint that
aerosol perturbations may be responsible for shifts in patterns of monsoon
rainfall <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.6"/>, decadal variability in the Atlantic which
may have led to a suppression of hurricane activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.7"/>,
diminished sunlight at the surface over Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.8"/> and the
conspicuous decrease in temperature over the eastern and central United
States during the middle of the last century <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.9"/>.
But these ideas have proven controversial: the response of the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) is
sensitive to the representation of the cloud processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.10"/>;
a purportedly strong North Atlantic cooling by the aerosol appears to be
inconsistent with the subsurface temperature record <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.11"/>,
and variations in the surface energy budget are difficult to extract from the
noise of natural variability, particularly at high latitudes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.12"/>. Coincident shifts in large-scale modes of natural
variability confound attempts to link climate responses to aerosol forcing.
For example, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation changed sign in the 1970s, at
the same time that aerosol forcing is thought to have maximized over the
Atlantic sector <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.13"/>. Clearly, a deeper understanding of how
the climate system responds to regional heating anomalies would provide a
stronger foundation for quantifying the role of aerosol forcing. Toward this
end, a simple method for prescribing aerosol-like anomalies in atmospheric
composition would be useful.</p>
      <p>These thoughts motivated us to develop a simple parameterization of
anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and the effect of the anthropogenic
aerosol on the radiative properties of clouds for use in climate models. We
aimed to develop an analytic description of the anthropogenic aerosol capable
of representing its observed spatiotemporal and spectral variability.
Similar, albeit even more simplistic, approaches have been attempted in the
past <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.14"/>, but not for the purpose of studying aerosol
changes, and without the benefit of modern observations. Our chosen
description would be fit to the present-day observational record, and scaled
backward and forward in time to capture past or future changes in aerosol and
aerosol precursor emissions. An analytic, albeit empirical, description was
desirable to avoid regridding a base climatology for a particular model
resolution, and to reduce the input data volume, particularly given the
importance and emphasis on the use of higher-resolution simulations in the
future. An ability to vary the aerosol properties over time is necessary to
represent scenarios of past and possible future effects of anthropogenic
activity. In contrast to comprehensive aerosol–chemistry–climate models, we
sought an approach that would be computationally lightweight, easy to
implement and modify, yet similarly compelling in its ability to represent
aerosol radiative forcing. By describing the aerosol in terms of its optical
properties and its effect on cloud-droplet population densities, we reduce the
chance of introducing discrepancies in forcing that may arise from different
choices for how to couple parameterizations of aerosol physical properties to
parameterizations of clouds and radiation. It is our hope that the methods we
develop will provide a welcome complement to comprehensive aerosol models,
spur research into how the climate system responds to forcing and help
clarify what degree of detail in the representation of aerosol radiative
forcing can lead to a response that is measurable against the noisy
background of natural variability.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Names, location and characteristics of individual plumes. Plumes
which have a non-harmonic contribution to their annual cycle have larger
amplitude (90–100 %) annual variations. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Source region</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Long.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Main features of annual cycle</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Europe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Industrial</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Amplitude 25 %, May max</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North America</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">40.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">277.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Industrial</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Amplitude 30 %, July max</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">East Asia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">114.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Industrial</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Amplitude 15 %, biharmonic, Oct and Apr max</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South Asia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">88.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Industrial</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Amplitude 10 %, maximum in mid-July</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North Africa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Biomass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Non-harmonic, Dec max, Mar–Oct min</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South America</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">298.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Biomass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Non-harmonic, Sep max, Jan–Jun min</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maritime Continent</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">106.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Biomass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Non-harmonic, Sep max, Jan–Jun min</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South central Africa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Biomass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Non-harmonic, Aug max, Jan–Dec min</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>20.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">135.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Industrial</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Amplitude 60 %, Sep max</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The organization of the paper is as follows. In Sect. 2, we describe the
aerosol distribution component of the parameterization, which is fit to an
observational climatology developed for the year 2005. In Sect. 3, we propose
an approach for linking anthropogenic aerosol optical depth to changes in
cloud active properties. Our representation of the 2005 aerosol distribution
and aerosol radiative effects, including induced changes on the scattering
cross section and albedo of clouds, is evaluated in Sect. 4 using global
simulations with the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model, the MPI-ESM. In
Sect. 5, we describe a procedure for scaling the 2005 climatology over the
historical period using anthropogenic aerosol and aerosol-precursor emission
estimates from different geographic regions, and show how a similar approach
can be adopted to projected future emissions. The approach and our main
results are summarized in Sect. 6.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Simple plumes as basis functions for representing anthropogenic aerosols</title>
      <p>Our basic idea is to associate spatial plumes of anthropogenic aerosols with
emissions from source regions. The plumes are constructed by fitting to a
climatology for the present-day (2005) distribution of anthropogenic aerosol
optical depths in the mid-visible (550 nm) range. To capture past changes,
the amplitude of these plumes will be scaled with the strength of the
anthropogenic emissions within the source region. Major anthropogenic
emissions are spatially compact, at least from a planetary perspective. This
motivates the adoption of a small number of plumes as basis functions for
representing anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and cloud active
properties. For simplicity, we consider two plume types: one that is
dominated by emissions from industrial emissions, the other from biomass
burning. Hereafter, we refer to these as industrial and biomass plumes,
respectively, even though each plume really composites over a mixture of
source activities. The industrial and biomass plumes are distinguished by the
strength of their seasonal cycle, their single-scattering albedo, and their
cloud-droplet population density susceptibility to anthropogenic aerosol
perturbations.</p>
      <p>The plumes are designed to fit the 2005 distribution of mid-visible
anthropogenic aerosol optical depth as described by the Max Planck Institute
Aerosol Climatology, MAC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.15"/>. MAC provides estimates of
monthly mean aerosol optical properties at a spatial resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
of latitude by 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of longitude. Climatological values of aerosol
properties are derived from high-quality data by ground-based sun-photometer
networks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.16"><named-content content-type="pre">AERONET;</named-content></xref> merged onto background maps from
global models participating in the Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project
(AeroCom). The merging is performed for different aerosol properties: aerosol
optical depth (AOD) at 440, 550 and 870 nm, absorbing AOD at 550 nm and, in
addition, for contributions to these properties by coarse-mode particles or
fine-mode aerosol particles. The merged fine-mode AOD (at 550 nm), along with a
scaling factor (anthropogenic fraction) based on fine-mode AOD output of
comprehensive aerosol–chemistry models, run for present-day and
pre-industrial conditions, define the anthropogenic AOD (at 550 nm) map of
MAC. An anthropogenic contribution to the coarse mode is assumed negligible.
MACv2 (MAC version 2), provides the baseline that the plume concept of
MACv2-SP attempts to approximate. MACv2 was adopted because it incorporates a
number of improvements compared to version 1, specifically (i) oceanic
reference data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.17"><named-content content-type="pre">from the Maritime Aerosol Network –
MAN;</named-content></xref> are now included; (ii) aerosol extensive optical
properties are merged; and (iii) on average, a roughly 30 % lower
anthropogenic fine-mode AOD fraction is assumed, yielding an anthropogenic
AOD more in line with other estimates. Adopting simple plumes as basis
functions to represent the anthropogenic aerosol could be adapted to any
climatology, but to reflect its origins in MACv2, hereafter we refer to our
model as MACv2-SP.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Global distribution of annually averaged anthropogenic aerosol
optical depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 550 nm. Also indicated are the locations
of MACv2-SP plume centers. Industrial and biomass plumes are distinguished by
the choice of symbol: circles for industrial plumes and triangles for biomass
plumes.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Nine plumes (five industrial and four biomass) appear to adequately capture
the spatial distribution of the anthropogenic aerosol of MACv2. The names
given to the individual plumes, the location of the plume centers and the
type of each plume is summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and illustrated in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> relative to the 2005 annual mean of MACv2. The plume
centers are placed where the local AOD, as represented by MACv2, maximizes.
Even for a perfect climatology this need not coincide with the location where
emissions maximize, as the AOD is influenced by deposition and transport. The
use of two plumes (north and south central Africa) in close proximity, to
define the contribution to anthropogenic AOD over Africa, enables a better
representation of different seasonal cycles.</p>
      <p>A basic premise in the development of MACv2-SP is that the shape of
individual plumes is independent of the strength of the source. This
assumption is reasonable as long as effects from changes in the atmospheric
circulation remain small relative to uncertainty in the aerosol pattern for a
given source. The lack of a clear signal of a feedback on the aerosol forcing
from changes in the climate supports this assumption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.18"/>.
A climatological approach omits, however, the coupling between synoptic
systems and the aerosol. This may be important to the aerosol effect:
experience suggests that rainier days are cloudier, but also less aerosol
laden at near-surface levels. Hence, prescribing the time
mean aerosol may result in a larger radiative forcing than would arise from
an aerosol with the same time mean properties, but which was allowed to
interact with the circulation, i.e., the bistability hypothesis of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.19"/>. These effects, which are expected to be more
pronounced for aerosol–cloud interactions, are accounted for in MACv2-SP by
setting the spatial and seasonal pattern of the aerosol based on MACv2, but
allowing a degree of freedom in the specification of its amplitude. In
MACv2-SP, the eventual amplitude of the forcing, though guided empirically,
is in effect a test quantity. The idea to use the flexibility of the
parameterization to see what amplitude of forcing produces a response that is
difficult to reconcile with the instrumental record (of, say, temperature).
Studies using a similar approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>
have suggested that this may help provide better bounds on the magnitude of
aerosol radiative forcing.</p>
      <p>Mathematically, MACv2-SP provides a five-dimensional (three spatial dimensions, time and
wavelength) description of the anthropogenic aerosol optical properties. The
climatology is built around a description of the volume extinction,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at 550 nm. In a second step, described later, the wavelength
dependence of the extinction is accounted for, and additional optical
properties are specified. Unless an explicit wavelength dependence is
specified, all properties are assumed valid at 550 nm.</p>
      <p>The total volume extinction of mid-visible radiance by the anthropogenic
aerosol, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given as the emission-weighted sum of the
extinction from nine different plumes:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M15" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> defines the extinction associated with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th plume for the
year 2005, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the emissions scaling. Year-to-year variations are
separated from annual variations by describing the time dependence by two
separated time variables. The emission scaling depends on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which denotes an integer year number,
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M20" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>:=</mml:mo><mml:mo>⌊</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>⌋</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        which can be, for example, 1966 or 2008. The annual cycle depends on the year fraction,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> In principle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a real
number defined over the unit interval; in our present implementation, the
annual cycle changes discretely over 52 intervals, i.e., roughly on a weekly basis.</p>
      <p>The optical path over a layer is defined as the integral of the volume
extinction,
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M23" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>In the event that the path is over the entire atmospheric column, it is
referred to as the optical depth. Unless explicitly specified, it is assumed
that the interval corresponds to the entire depth of the atmosphere, in which
case we speak of the column integral or the anthropogenic aerosol column
optical depth.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Horizontal spatial pattern of the anthropogenic aerosol optical
depth plumes. Single east Asian plume is on the left; all nine plumes, right. Contour
levels are 0.005 (dashed), 0.05, 0.1 and 0.3 (thickened). Plumes are shown
for September 2005, a time of year when there is also a substantial
anthropogenic contribution from tropical and Southern Hemisphere biomass
burning.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Plume spatial structure</title>
      <p>The spatial structure of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are given through the superposition of two
individual features (or sub-plumes) weighted by an annual cycle. For
these features, we have chosen rotated quasi-Gaussian functions, such that

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M25" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M26" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the plume number, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the feature number,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the feature weighting in an annual cycle,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the vertical weighting, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the column optical depth of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th plume at its center in the reference year (2005) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
latitude and longitude of the plume centers. The feature weights <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
split into time weights <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describing the annual cycle,
and relative feature weights <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> giving a specific weight to each
feature. Hence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and is
constructed to guarantee that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The feature weights are plume dependent and are
chosen so that the spatial pattern of MACv2 is reproduced by MACv2-SP, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of MACv2 and MACv2-SP are the same at the plume center.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Horizontal structure</title>
      <p>To better represent the near- and far-field aerosol distributions, as seen in
MACv2, two features are adopted for each plume, as shown in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>). One is shaped like a Gaussian feature; the other is only piecewise
Gaussian. The Gaussian feature is chosen to be rotationally symmetric and is
introduced to represent the near-field AOD structure in the vicinity of the
source. The quasi-Gaussian features are elongated to mimic asymmetric
transport with prevailing winds and a possibly asymmetric distributions of
sources and sinks. The covariance matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the
latitudinal and longitudinal extent of each piecewise Gaussian feature such
that
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M41" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>if</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow/></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>if</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The components of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are chosen subjectively so as to
reasonably fit the climatology.</p>
      <p>The horizontal orientation of the plumes is also controlled by the rotation
matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M44" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are tuned for each plume and feature to match the
MACv2 monthly climatology. For instance, the midlatitude plumes point
northeastward from the centers, which can be attributed to prevailing
westerlies and, in the case of North America, the distribution of sources.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Annual (2005) mean anthropogenic aerosol optical depth (550 nm)
between 30 and 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N for MACv2-SP (blue) and MACv2 (red).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Adopting simple plumes as basis functions for representing the aerosol
reasonably captures the spatial patterns of the observed plumes. This is
illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, whose left panel first shows the
structure of a single (east Asian) plume for the month of September 2005.
Here, many features of the plume construction are evident, e.g., the asymmetry
and the rotation of its major axis relative to the cardinal directions. The
composite structure that emerges when all nine plumes are activated is also
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> (right). Here, eight plume centers can be
identified, with the east Asian, Indian and Indonesian biomass plume forming
a tri-polar structure. The north central African plume is weak during boreal
summer and subsumed in the south central African plume so that it is not
evident as a distinct feature.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> compares <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaged over the latitudes
from 30 to 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. Even with a relatively small number of degrees of
freedom, MACv2-SP can capture many of the details of the spatial structure as
represented in the original MACv2 climatology.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Vertical profile of fractional aerosol optical depth (550 nm)
from MACv2-SP with respect to the column integral at each location <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Shown by the blue lines are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (i.e., the fraction of the AOD) for the
east Asian, European and central African plume; red is the distribution taken
from MACv2.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Vertical structure</title>
      <p>The aerosol optical depth is distributed over height by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chosen as the kernel of
Euler's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> The Heaviside function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is introduced to
ensure that the plume is only defined above the surface and below a specified
height, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Thus,

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M56" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="script">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>with</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="cases" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>if</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>otherwise</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> define the kernel of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> function for
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th plume and are tuned to reproduce the vertical distribution of the
fine-mode MACv2 AOD averaged over a 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude by 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude box about the plume center. The height, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
specified to be 15 km to ensure that the plume does not extend into the
middle and upper atmosphere, where its shape would no longer be
dominantly constrained by the processes in the
troposphere. Normalization by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ensures
that the vertical weighting does not change the column optical depth, except
in the case when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extends below the surface. In the implementation,
the discrete integral of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> function is formed to ensure that this
relation is also satisfied discretely. Prescribing the vertical distribution
in this manner, whereby the vertical weighting is first defined from the
distance above the sea surface, ensures that plumes whose origins are in
low-lying areas (which is the case for each of our plumes) do not
unrealistically extend over neighboring topography, as they would otherwise.
The improvement this introduces over regions of topography is evident, for
instance, over southeast Asia, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. It implies
that the aerosol optical depth is reduced over elevated terrain. If the climatology were to be
extended to include elevated source regions, this prescription should be
modified.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for three plumes compared to the fractions
from MACv2.0. The largest extinction occurs in low levels for all plumes.
Maxima in the tropics, e.g., central Africa, shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c,
are shifted to higher altitudes compared to the extratropics, e.g., China and
Europe (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a–b), consistent with deeper mixing over Africa,
particularly in the dry season.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Annual cycle</title>
      <p>Individual plumes can have their own annual cycle, whose relative amplitude
is assumed to be independent of year-to-year variations in emissions. This is
what one expects if the annual cycle is determined mostly by meteorology, for
instance, as in the case of open burning where meteorology influences both
the aerosol sinks (wet deposition) and sources (availability and condition of
fuel). The annual cycle is fit to MACv2, and is particularly pronounced over
biomass burning regions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Variation of the column and globally averaged anthropogenic aerosol
optical depth (550 nm) over the annual cycle. Shown are values for the
year 2005 for the global average (solid) and for the deep tropics
equatorward of 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>For all but two plumes, the same time weights <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are applied to both of
its features. The exceptions are the South American and south
African plumes, which have different annual cycles for each feature. The annual mean value of the time
weights is specified to be unity, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Currently, we define two types of annual cycles.
The first type is a small one for industrial plumes, which is given as a
harmonic perturbation about the annual mean,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M72" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the annual component, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the phase and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> an
integer. For all but the east Asian plume, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, defining a single annual
cycle. For east Asia, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thereby leading to a semiannual cycle, e.g.,
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. The second type of annual cycle is given by linearly
interpolating to specified monthly values to fit the non-harmonic annual
cycle of biomass burning plumes that emerges in MACv2.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the monthly mean of the globally averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the mean just for latitudes equatorward of 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
illustrate the effect of the seasonal scaling. The global annual cycle is
mostly carried by the biomass burning plumes in the deep tropics. These
biomass plumes are most pronounced in the boreal summer or the dry season
over tropical land masses in the Southern Hemisphere. It remains debatable as
to whether the annual cycle in aerosol forcing projects detectably onto the
climate system, something that MACv2-SP can be easily used to test.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Optical properties as a function of plume type. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
denotes the mid-visible (550 nm) single-scattering albedo, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
asymmetry parameter (also at 550 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the Ångström
coefficient in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plume type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Industrial</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biomass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Wavelength-dependent optical properties</title>
      <p>The spectral (wavelength) dependance of the anthropogenic aerosol extinction
is specified through an Ångström parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, such that

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the Ångström parameter may vary from plume to
plume. The aerosol optical path is geometrically related to the extinction by
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), but in the two-stream approximation its effect on
radiative transfer also requires spectral-dependent information for the
asymmetry factor and single-scattering albedo of the aerosol.</p>
      <p>The anthropogenic aerosol is assumed to be small in size (ca. 150 nm in
radius), so that the Ångström parameter is near 2.0, and
prescribed to adopt this value. For
the single-scattering albedo, properties averaged over 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude
by 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude regions around plume centers suggest
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for urban pollution and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for plumes dominated by
seasonal biomass burning, as summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. To extend
these values to other wavelengths, we assume they are constant over the
ultraviolet and visible regions of the solar spectrum (200–700 nm) but are
reduced in the near-infrared (from 700–3000 nm). This reduction arises from
the small aerosol size, which in the Rayleigh limit of the wavelength
becoming much larger than the particle requires a reduction to both
single-scattering albedo and the asymmetry factor.</p>
      <p>For the single-scattering albedo <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the plume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we
adopt
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>otherwise,</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M96" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>700</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>nm</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dependance in this expression is motivated by the fact that
in the Rayleigh limit, absorption is inversely proportional to the wavelength
and scattering scales with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> so that their ratio is
proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The asymmetry parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is likewise adjusted for
wavelengths larger than 700 nm such that
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M101" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="cases" columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>otherwise.</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In all cases, the effect of the aerosol on the transfer of radiant energy at
wavelengths larger than 3000 nm (which, in a practical sense, applies to the
treatment of longwave radiative transfer solvers) is neglected, consistent
with the assumption that the anthropogenic aerosol predominates in the fine
mode. The final spatial optical properties arising from the superposition of
different plumes are calculated by optical depth weighting (or, in the case of
the asymmetry factor, by the optical-depth-weighted single-scattering albedo)
as is customary.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Satellite data used to evaluate the relationship between fine-mode
optical depth and cloud-droplet population density.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="384.112205pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Platform</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MODIS collection 5.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Level 3 data are from NASA's EOS-Aqua platform for the 12 months from December 2006 to November 2007. Retrievals of cloud-droplet population densities, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, assume that they are constant throughout the cloud and that the liquid water is linearly increasing with height in the cloud. Estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are derived using the multispectral method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.21"/> by combining simultaneous retrievals of both cloud optical depth and droplet radius at the cloud top. See <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.22"/> for further details. Corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data are taken from NASA's LAADS website.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MODIS collection 6.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Level 3 data are from NASA's EOS-Aqua platform for the 12 months from January to December 2008. Estimates of the cloud-droplet population density are based on the assumption of adiabatic stratification<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.23"/> and were provided by John Rausch of Vanderbilt University. Corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data were pulled from NASA's LAADS website.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AATSR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Data are from ESA's ENVISAT platform for the 3-month period (Jun–Aug 2008). CDNC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data were retrieved with the Oxford-RAL aerosol and cloud (ORAC) retrieval algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.24"/> and data for CDNC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were provided by Matthew Christensen from the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Fine-mode aerosol optical depth (at 550 nm) from different
satellite retrievals. Shown are annual averages of MODIS collection 6 for
2008 (upper left), MODIS collection 5.1 for 2007 (upper right); boreal summer
(JJA) 2008 averages of MODIS collection 6 (lower left) and boreal summer
(JJA) for AATSR-ORAC (lower right). Grey indicates no data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The values of the plume aerosol properties are based on AERONET data, and as
such are consistent with an earlier analysis of that data by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.25"/>. However, the use of constant values to capture the
average property of a plume considerably belies local variability. To what
extent such details are important for the climate response to aerosol forcing
is unknown, but MACv2-SP makes it possible to explore this question.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Cloud active properties</title>
      <p>To derive a relationship between the anthropogenic aerosol and cloud
properties, we first explored the relationship between the fine-mode aerosol
optical depth, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
cloud-droplet population densities, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The spatial association between
estimates of the two quantities is available from satellite observations and
from modeling. Three different satellite datasets, described at a spatial
(latitude, longitude) resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, are considered. Two datasets
are from different processing versions of the MODIS (Moderate Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer) sensor data, and one is based on the AATSR
(Advanced Along Track Scanning Radiometer) sensor data. MODIS, due to its
wider swath, offers more samples than AATSR does. A minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of 0.05 was adopted to ensure retrieval reliability. Further details of these
data are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>. Similarly, monthly
averaged output from different global aerosol models participating in the
AeroCom project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.26"/> was also analyzed. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were
derived for levels warmer than the melting level from the indirect effect
analysis of <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.27"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>, and monthly averages of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were analyzed for both the pre-industrial (1850) and
present-day (2005) conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.28"/>. Model output was
regridded to the spatial resolution (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude by 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
longitude) of the satellite data for subsequent analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annually averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from different satellite retrievals. Shown are
MODIS collection 6 for 2008 (upper left) and MODIS collection 5.1 for 2007
(upper right); boreal summer (JJA) 2008 averages of MODIS collection 6 (lower
left) and boreal summer (JJA) for AATSR-ORAC (lower right). Grey indicates no
data. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in global modeling are
quite diverse and, on average, stronger than suggested by observations. In
contrast, the satellite retrievals are more consistent, even though spatial
(and temporal) coverage is limited to overcast oceanic regions. For this
reason, our parameterization is founded on the satellite data; nonetheless, the
relationship we derive remains consistent with the modeling given the large
model spread.</p>
      <p>Values of fine-mode optical depth and cloud-droplet population densities,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved from satellite measurements are presented
in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. The MODIS collection 6 data are
presented for the annual average and for the boreal summer season to allow
for comparison with MODIS collection 5.1 (annual) and AATSR (seasonal). Due
to quality control requirements, whereby retrievals are avoided in broken
cloud scenes, the displayed data locations represent only a subset of the
actually available data for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Overall, the retrievals suggest that there is a relationship between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For instance, regions of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
over the eastern-boundary currents in the Atlantic, near the Indian
subcontinent, west of Japan and between Japan and the Asian mainland
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>) also correspond to elevated values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). The presence of an apparent relationship is consistent
with previous work. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.29"/>, for instance, related local
observations of total AOD to measurements of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and
then, in a second step, related values of CCN to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Some early studies of
aerosol radiative forcing also adopted a similar approach
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.30"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The correspondence between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is not perfect. For example, elevated values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Californian
stratocumulus regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>) do not show a commensurately
pronounced retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) – although even
here variability in the background contribution to fine-mode aerosol may mask
relationships. In addition, although the retrievals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
the different satellite platforms are broadly consistent, estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
are much more variable and show systematic differences across the various
products. Retrievals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> based on MODIS collection 5.1 yield much larger
estimates than those based on collection 6.0 (e.g.,
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>).</p>
      <p>The covariation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is quantified through a
consideration of all of the available data, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>.
To construct this figure, retrieved values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are binned as a function of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drawn from clear-sky retrievals in the same geographic
region. Shown are retrievals from satellite data (upper panel) and model
output (lower panel). Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were excluded due to
insufficient samples. The data of the joint histograms are statistically
analyzed in 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins. Along the median values in each
histogram, logarithmic fits of the form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have
been constructed and are displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. Despite
considerable scatter, the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a
systematic one: across almost all of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and this increase becomes smaller for larger
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> This is true for both the model output and the retrievals,
although the relationship is somewhat stronger in the latter, and a bit less
regular. A logarithmic function captures this behavior and is consistent with
understanding that an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is expected to be
associated with a smaller increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was to begin with. One reason for such behavior is that
with more available cloud condensation nuclei, peak supersaturations reduce,
leading to a smaller activated fraction
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.31"/>. Although the exact
form of any purported relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
debated, this analysis shows that a logarithmic relationship reasonably
represents the data.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Fine-mode aerosol optical depth and cloud-droplet population density
joint histograms based on monthly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) averaged data.
Histograms are based on retrievals from MODIS collection 6 (upper) and
AeroCom Phase I models. The derived relationship is presented in the upper-right
section of each panel based on a fit along the highest frequency of 20
AOD section bins. The data in each AOD bin are summarized by boxes which
indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers outside each box
indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles; the horizontal line and the dot in
each box indicate the median and average, respectively. The solid line
denotes the fit to the data in the plot, and the dashed the data in the other
plot.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>This logarithmic relationship forms the basis for representing the Twomey
effect in MACv2-SP. The functional form proposed based on the analysis of the
satellite data, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, gives
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M155" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are parameters. For the fit to MODIS C6,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scales a spatial
pattern of the background fine-mode aerosol that is the same as for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but is not something that can be derived from the data. It
is a tuning parameter. Physically, we associate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a
background contribution to the AOD, as even in a pristine atmosphere cloud
condensation nuclei are produced from purely natural processes and assumed to
be distributed with the meteorology similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Based on
Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>,
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M163" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>By prescribing the MACv2-SP Twomey effect in the form of the ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it does not interfere with the background (1850) droplet
population, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that was used to tune the host model, and it ensures
that, all else being equal, the proportional change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the
anthropogenic aerosol will be insensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> The strength of the
Twomey effect in MACv2-SP thus depends largely on the specification of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p>
      <p>In MACv2-SP, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated identically to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> except that there is no emission weighting and the
background plume amplitudes (the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) are chosen to
represent the contribution of the pre-1850 aerosol to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These were
chosen to be prescribed factors for industrial versus biomass regions with
values that gave what are believed to be reasonable, globally and annually
averaged droplet concentrations for the present day. A globally uniform
background fine-mode AOD of 0.02 is also included on top of the
pre-industrial (1850) source contribution so as to represent the effect of
distributed sources such as sea salt, or DMS (dimethyl sulfide) emissions, on the
background (1850) cloud-droplet population density. Because it describes the
background, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not emission weighted, but adopts values
that are fixed in time. In Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E15"/>), the possibility of maintaining
an annual cycle in the prescription of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is indicated by the
dependence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> even if in the present implementation of
MACv2-SP such an effect is not implemented. Because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
specified as part of MACv2-SP, it will not necessarily be consistent with the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the models. But given that the purpose is simply to specify a
consistent value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all of the models, this is only a formal
inconsistency in how one interprets Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E15"/>). Its ultimate
consequence is that it inhibits models with a cleaner background state from
having a larger Twomey effect for the same aerosol perturbation.</p>
      <p>Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E15"/>) is consistent with the data and with understanding, but
it is admittedly crude. One could imagine a variety of other relationships
fitting the data equally well. Precisely for this reason, we favor a very
simple form, as it makes the underlying assumptions transparent and easy to
change. Toward this end, in a companion paper, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.32"/>
examine in some detail how the effective radiative forcing depends on the
form of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E15"/>) and its parameters. Consistent with what was found
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.33"/>, it is shown that the strength of the background,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has the greatest impact on the radiative forcing from
aerosol–cloud interactions, and it does so by effectively controlling how far
from the plume center aerosol perturbations are allowed to influence cloud
properties. If aerosol perturbations are allowed to extend further over the
remote oceans, affecting larger regions with a darker surface, a greater
(more negative) global mean radiative forcing arises.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>ISO codes for countries contributing to individual plumes. The union
codes of the set of 20 countries with the largest amount of 2014 SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions and the set of the 20 countries with the largest total SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions since 1850 are indicated in bold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="398.338583pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plume</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ISO code</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">alb, aut, bel, bgr, bih, blr, che, cyp, <bold>cze</bold>, <bold>deu</bold>, dnk, <bold>esp</bold>, est, fin, <bold>fra</bold>, fro, <bold>gbr</bold>, geo, gib, grc, hrv, hun, irl, isl, isr, ita, jor, lbn, lie, ltu, lux, lva, mda, mkd, mlt, mne, nld, nor, <bold>pol</bold>, prt, pse, rou, <bold>rus</bold>, srb, srb (kosovo), svk, svn, swe, <bold>tur</bold>, <bold>ukr</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North America</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">atg, bhs, blz, bmu, <bold>can</bold>, cub ,cym, dma, dom, grl, hti, jam, kna, <bold>mex</bold>, pri, spm, sxm, tca, <bold>usa</bold>, vgb, vir</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">East Asia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>chn</bold>, hkg, <bold>jpn</bold>, kgz, kor, mac, mng, twn</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South Asia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">afg, are, arm, aze, bgd, bhr, btn, <bold>ind</bold>, <bold>irn</bold>, <bold>irq</bold>, <bold>kaz</bold>, kwt, lka, mdv, mmr, npl, omn, <bold>pak</bold>, qat, <bold>sau</bold>, syc, syr, tjk, tkm, uzb, yem</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North central Africa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ben, bfa, caf, civ, cmr, cpv, dji, dza, egy, eri, esh, eth, gab, gha, gin, gmb, gnb, gnq, ken, lbr, lby, mar, mli, mrt, ner, nga, sdn, sen, sle, som, ssd, stp, tcd, tgo, tun</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South America</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">abw, arg, bol, <bold>bra</bold>, brb, chl, col, cri, cuw, ecu, flk, glp, grd, gtm, guf, guy, hnd, lca, msr, mtq, nic, pan, <bold>per</bold>, prk, pry, slv, sur, tto, ury, vct, ven</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maritime Continent</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">brn, fsm, gum, <bold>idn</bold>, khm, lao, mys, phl, plw, png, sgp, slb, tha, vnm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South central Africa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ago, bdi, bwa, cod, cog, com, lso, mdg, moz, mus, mwi, nam, reu, rwa, swz, tza, uga, <bold>zaf</bold>, <bold>zmb</bold>, zwe</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">asm, <bold>aus</bold>, cok, fji, kir, mhl, ncl, niu, nzl, pyf, tkl, tls, ton, vut, wlf, wsm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Time-varying forcing</title>
      <p>The year-to-year variations are specified as a time series,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denoting the year following a
Gregorian calendar. Physically, it can be thought of as the column
anthropogenic aerosol optical depth of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th plume, at the plume center,
normalized by its value in a reference year.
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M185" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        By definition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is unity at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the present implementation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Different approaches to the annual scaling have been considered. One approach
is to scale values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by its ratio in any given year to its ratio in
2005 as calculated by aerosol–climate models. This approach helps account for
the variety of processes that likely control AOD and can also be readily
extended to the future. This connection to the more comprehensive modeling
is attractive, but makes it difficult to change and lacks the transparency we
desire. Instead, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is related to estimates of the past or
projections of future emissions. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes
the annual emissions of component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for plume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, then

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M194" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E17"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2005</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the weighting of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th constituent emission
contribution to the plume amplitude, for instance, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E17"/>) ensures that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2005</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
prescription has been chosen with application to CMIP6 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.34"/>
in mind, as it allows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be added to the background used by
models in their control run, which is traditionally taken as 1850. Hence, the
application of the MACv2-SP does not require models to rerun their control
simulations. If one is interested in using this method for periods prior to
1850, or for scenarios where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1850</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the implied negative perturbation may exceed the
background, which would require the approach to be revisited. Defining
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">E</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the global emissions of constituent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the global weighting, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined analogously to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E17"/>).</p>
      <p>Both SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are allowed to contribute to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> For these emissions, we use estimates from the Community
Emissions Data System (CEDS; see
<uri>http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/ceds/ceds-cmip6-data/</uri>). The CEDS is a
data-driven, open-source framework developed to provide historical emission
estimates of aerosol and precursor compounds. These emission data are being
released for use as historical forcing input data for CMIP6. So as to capture
all emissions, each country in the CEDS is associated with one of our nine
plumes, as described by Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
provided as an 11-year averaged value centered on the whole year, e.g., 1910
or 1950. As an example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn>1950</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated using the
emission data from 1945 through 1955 inclusive. Yearly values are then
interpolated from these decadal values. Yearly values could easily be
provided, but specifying the data in terms of decadal averages makes the
climatology easier to change. Because the CEDS only includes emissions
through 2014, the last decadal value in 2010 is an average over the 10-year
period between 2005 and 2014.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5"><caption><p>Weights of precursor emission components.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Scales with</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.645</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.355</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions alone is not the same as assuming
that only SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributes to the anthropogenic aerosol, but rather that
other anthropogenic aerosol and precursor compound emissions scale with the
emission of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> an important but subtle distinction. Scaling
anthropogenic aerosol forcing by SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions alone appears to reasonably
capture the behavior of CMIP5 models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.35"/>. Nonetheless, there
is some evidence that aerosol forcing may have begun to decouple from SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions with the onset of more stringent air quality controls in some
countries beginning in the late 1970s and will increasingly do so in the
future <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.36"/>. To allow for this possibility, we add a
second component which scales like the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. The relative weight
of these two components is chosen so that the optical depth of the plume
associated with the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> component is one-third of that from SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
year 2005 (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>). This ratio of one-third was chosen to
match the ratio between present-day sulfate and ammonia forcing in the
AeroCom II models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.37"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Equivalent SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for the different plumes in different
years in Tg SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fraction of emissions of black carbon, relative to
the fraction in 2005 is shown in parentheses. A value of 0.3 means that the
black carbon fraction was 30 % of the 2005 black carbon fraction in a
given region.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Source region</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1900</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1950</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1980</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Europe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.95 (2.52)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.26 (1.91)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">56.80 (0.84)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.41 (1.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.35(1.19)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North America</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.65 (2.41)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.09 (1.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.32 (0.81)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.45 (1.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.39 (1.57)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">East Asia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.17 (0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.69 (0.95)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.72 (0.98)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37.36 (1.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.89 (1.34)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South Asia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.18 (3.80)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.57 (1.62)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.18 (0.98)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.17 (1.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.89 (0.97)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North Africa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08 (1.36)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20 (1.23)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.02 (0.94)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.70 (1.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.94 (0.99)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South America</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12 (2.75)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.24 (1.12)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.81 (0.85)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.88 (1.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.26 (1.09)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maritime Continent</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.03 (3.34)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22 (1.93)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.13 (0.87)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.15 (1.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.43 (1.07)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">South central Africa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.04 (2.71)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.42 (0.66)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.83 (0.53)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.35 (1.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.29 (1.01)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23 (1.29)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.63 (1.18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.61 (1.08)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.57 (1.00)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.39 (1.14)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Contributions to anthropogenic AOD distribution. The annual scaling
factor for the global emissions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows the strength of the
globally averaged post-1850 anthropogenic AOD relative to its value in 2005,
along with the relative weighting of its precursors which scale with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
versus NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, respectively, panel <bold>(a)</bold>. Contributions (panel <bold>b</bold>) from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by different regions to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Contributions (panel <bold>b</bold>) from four
regions: Europe (blue), North America (grey), south and east Asia (red) and
the four biomass plumes (black). The 11-year averages centered on the middle
year of a decadal average are shown by filled circles. The departure between
the circles and the lines for the Asian plumes in 1850 is because emissions
over east Asia are estimated to have decreased in the first decade after
1850, and the decadal scaling coefficients were not allowed to be negative.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>As intended, the addition of an NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> component to the temporal scaling
moderates the effect of air quality regulations since the late 1970s. This is
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>. The blue dashed curve in the upper panel
describes the relative contribution of aerosol precursors which scale like
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. A value of 0.5, as is, for instance, evident around 1950, means that
these precursors contributed to a global anthropogenic AOD relative to 1850
that is 50 % of what it was in 2005. The green dashed curve shows the
same for components that scale with NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, and together the blue
and green curves sum to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown by the black curve.
Absolute values of the equivalent SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions plus 0.55 times NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions (each measured in Tg), and the relative contribution of absorbing
aerosol emissions, are tabulated for different time periods for the different
plumes in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T6"/>.</p>
      <p>Other factors, which do not correlate with regional NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions, may also influence the amplitude of anthropogenic aerosol plumes.
However, a direct link to emissions is simple, transparent and appears to
capture the main features seen in more complex models. This is evident both
in terms of the temporal trend in the global signal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.38"/> and
in shifts of regional patterns, e.g., the very large regional shifts in
aerosol loading over the last 40 years. Prior to the 1990s, emissions from
North America and Europe dominated contributions to the anthropogenic
aerosol. Thereafter, Asian sources became more important. This is shown in the
lower panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>, where the relative contributions
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from a particular plume, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or a group of plumes, is plotted. It
shows, for instance, that according to MACv2-SP, in the year 2010, south and
east Asia were responsible for 60 % of the total anthropogenic aerosol.
Before 1970 emissions in the Atlantic sector were responsible for the vast
majority of emissions. Changes in emissions over Europe rather than North
America appear to be more important for the rapid rise of emissions, from
about half their present-day values in 1950 to their local maximum around
1980. Because European emissions are more centered over the continent, one
would expect this rise to be somewhat less effective than it would have been
had it been associated with North American sources. The emissions history
also suggests that the overwhelming amount of emissions have and continue to
be dominated by Northern Hemisphere sources.</p>
      <p>In the present implementation, the single-scattering albedo of the individual
plumes does not vary with time. A different balance of emissions of absorbing
versus scattering aerosols can be evaluated by comparing estimates of
historical black carbon emissions to the emission factors used to scale the
amplitudes of the MACv2-SP plumes. This ratio is plotted in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> and suggests that the ratio was more or less constant over
the first half of the last century, and began to decrease after around 1980
as efforts were made to limit SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. A more absorbing
anthropogenic aerosol would, all else being equal, lead to less radiative
forcing per unit optical depth. The effects on the regional scale can be
large, as is demonstrated by comparing the change in the ratio of black
carbon to equivalent SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the historical record (e.g.,
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T6"/>). Based on the CEDS data, the amount of black carbon
emissions per unit equivalent SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions was about twice as large over
Europe in 1950 as it was in 2005. This apparent brightening of the aerosol
prior to about 1970 suggests that aerosol forcing in the period before
extensive efforts to reduce SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in the 1970s would have
contributed to the radiative efficiency of the aerosol increasing with time,
decreasing again after 1980. For the present, such effects are not included in
MACv2-SP, which does not consider aerosol composition changes for biomass and
industrial plumes over time. In light of the arguments of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.39"/>, experiments to judge the magnitude of such changes are
warranted.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Relative weight of black carbon emissions versus equivalent SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions as compared to a value of unity in 2005. For example, a value of 0.75
in 1920 implies that the emissions of black carbon relative to the weighted
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were 75 % of their 2005 value. The dashed
line, corresponding to a ratio of 0.73, is the mean from 1900 to the
present.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Assessing MACv2-SP: climatology and radiative forcing</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Aerosol optical depth and cloud active properties climatology</title>
      <p>MACv2-SP appears to do an adequate job in capturing the main features of the
MACv2 climatology of the anthropogenic aerosol. This is illustrated in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>, where we compare 2 months of the MACv2
climatology with MACv2-SP. The main centers of action over North and South
America, Asia, central Africa and northern Australia, as well as the more
complex structure of the aerosol over south and east Asia, extending over the
Maritime Continent appear to be well fit. The seasonal shift between March,
where the Asian aerosol is more extended over the Pacific, to September,
where Southern Hemisphere and equatorial biomass burning regions are more
pronounced, is also well represented by MACv2-SP. As compared to
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, the treatment of the vertical distribution also helps
capture the reduction in column anthropogenic aerosol burden in regions of
elevated terrain. This is most evident over the Tibetan Plateau but is also
apparent over the Altiplano, near Bolivia, and to a lesser extent over the
Alps. Compared to MACv2, MACv2-SP has a more compact spatial footprint, with
less column burden of anthropogenic aerosol in the Southern Hemisphere, and
the structure of the main aerosol plumes is smoother, reflecting the shape of
the underlying plumes. This smoothness causes a somewhat greater eastward
extent, for instance, of the Asian aerosol. These types of biases may
exaggerate the downstream effect of the cloud active aerosol as they will
project effectively onto maritime clouds and hence radiative forcing.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Anthropogenic aerosol optical depth (550 nm), for March and
September, from MACv2-SP and MACv2. MACv2-SP (March, panel <bold>a</bold>;
September, panel <bold>c</bold>), MACv2 (March, panel <bold>b</bold>; September,
panel <bold>d</bold>). Scale is distorted for low AOD to better illustrate very low
values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T7"><caption><p>Metrics of optical depth for the total (anthropogenic and natural)
aerosol. Shown are the global values, the hemispheric ratio and the root
mean square difference. For the AeroCom models, this is calculated with
respect to the AeroCom mean; for MACv2-SP, this is calculated relative to
MACv2. In the case of the total aerosol, for the AeroCom models, we consider
26 calculations and disregard the outliers by showing the values of the first
and third quartiles and the median. For the anthropogenic aerosol, the
tabulated results are taken from Table 2 of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.40"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Global</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RMSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Anthro-</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pogenic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MACv2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.124</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.030</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MACv2-SP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.121</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.019</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.028</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AeroCom Q1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.116</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.048</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.026</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AeroCom median</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.131</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.063</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.027</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AeroCom Q3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.071</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.040</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>To more quantitatively estimate how well MACv2-SP represents understanding of
the present-day anthropogenic aerosol distribution, we calculate some global
measures and compare them to the spread across state-of-the-art aerosol
climate models participating in the AeroCom project. In
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T7"/>, we summarize the global and hemispheric total column
AODs in MACv2-SP and the anthropogenic (relative to 1850) contribution.
MACv2 is well within the range of the AeroCom models, with an AOD midway
between the AeroCom median and second quartile, but a slightly larger
anthropogenic component. The hemispheric asymmetry in MACv2 is near, but
slightly larger than the AeroCom median, but well within the interquartile
spread. The diversity of the AeroCom model spatial distributions, as measured
by the root mean square difference from the AeroCom mean, is much larger than
the root mean square distance between MACv2 and MACv2-SP. The smallest
root mean square distance of any of the AeroCom models is 0.031, more than
50 % greater than the mean distance between MACv2-SP and MACv2. MACv2-SP
thus lies well within the space of aerosol distributions described by more
comprehensive models, is a good fit to MACv2 and is the basis for our
claim that MACv2-SP provides an adequate representation of the anthropogenic
aerosol.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p>Proportional change between 2005 and 1850 in cloud-droplet
population density associated with anthropogenic aerosol. Contour levels
denote a 2 (dashed), 7, 15, 25 and 35 % (thickened) increase in
population density. The global average of the spatial distribution of ratios
is given on the upper right.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The parameterized impact of the anthropogenic aerosol on the droplet
population density results in a nearly 10 % increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the
vicinity of pollution sources, the effect can be much larger.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> illustrates the annually averaged effect, which is
concentrated over the main industrial plumes. Regionally, this can lead to an
annual mean increase in droplet population densities by over 35 %. The
global mean change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming clouds are equally likely everywhere, is
a little over 7 %.</p>
      <p>Based on ice-core data, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.41"/> assumed that droplet
population density increases by roughly twice this value, or 15 %. After
the massive aerosol infusions associated with the Bárðarbunga eruption
of 2014, which led to local AOD perturbations of 0.2, droplet population
densities increased by only 50 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.42"/>. Likewise, local
droplet perturbations accompanying large aerosol perturbations associated
with ship tracks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.43"/> are found to be of a similar
magnitude. The idea that the global influence of aerosol perturbations may
not be so large is also supported by the idea of larger background
concentrations following the identification of additional natural (biogenic)
pathways to new particle formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. These
findings imply a lesser dependance of cloud active aerosol on human-related
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbations. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.45"/> argued that a global change of
15 % is a reasonable upper bound when one considers evidence from
ship tracks. Because MACv2-SP does not interact with the meteorology, a
smaller perturbation is required to capture the same radiative effect if the
covariance between the aerosol perturbation and cloudiness is negative. Based
on these arguments, we believe that the changes in droplet population
densities, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, parameterized by MACv2-SP, provide a reasonable
estimate of the radiative effect associated with the anthropogenic aerosol.
Nonetheless, given a poor understanding of the relationship between droplet
population densities and bulk properties of the ambient aerosol, this number
comes with considerable uncertainty. One advantage of MACv2-SP is the ease
with which this uncertainty can be sampled, as is explored further in a
companion study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.46"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p>Effective radiative forcing (ERF) and its breakdown into different
components: clear-sky ERF (upper panel); all-sky ERF without
aerosol–cloud interaction (middle); all-sky ERF with
aerosol–cloud interaction (bottom). The numbers on the top right of the
figure denote the global mean and the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere mean,
respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Structure and estimates of radiative forcing from MACv2-SP</title>
      <p>To give an idea of how much forcing is actually associated with MACv2-SP and
to test its implementation within an Earth system model, we have made
estimates of the radiative forcing associated MACv2-SP using the Max Planck
Institute Earth System Model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.47"><named-content content-type="pre">MPI-ESM1.2;</named-content></xref> using an updated
atmosphere component, ECHAM6.3, which will be used in the new version (1.2)
of this model. AMIP (Atmosphere Model Intercomparison Project) type runs were
used for this analysis. The radiative forcing has been calculated from a
three-member ensemble in two different ways. Instantaneous radiative forcing
is estimated from an AMIP run by differencing the results from two calls to
the radiation at each radiation time step. In one call, the radiative
properties correspond to the given atmospheric state and the pre-industrial
(control run) aerosol, and in a second call, the pre-industrial aerosol and
assumed cloud-droplet population density are augmented by the anthropogenic
perturbation provided by MACv2-SP. The model integrates the radiative heating
rates calculated in the second call. A period of 11 years (2000–2010) is
simulated with sea surface temperatures and sea-ice concentrations
prescribed. To exclude possible effects of the initial conditions, the first
year was excluded from the analysis. Hence, the model samples a variety of
atmospheric states over the subsequent
10 years. Each of the 11 simulated years has the same annual cycle of
anthropogenic aerosol properties. We also calculate the effective radiative
forcing (ERF) by comparing an ensemble of three AMIP simulations for the
2000–2011 period using the 2005 MACv2-SP anthropogenic aerosol added to an
1850 (pre-industrial) background aerosol with an ensemble of five simulations
for the same period using just this background aerosol. The difference
between the instantaneous and effective radiative forcing gives an estimate
of the atmospheric adjustments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.48"/>.</p>
      <p>The clear-sky ERF is estimated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when calculated using a double radiation call) and
its spatial pattern, shown in the upper panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>, is what
one expects given the distribution of MACv2-SP AOD, cf.
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. To estimate how natural variability contributes to
uncertainty in the estimate of the ERF, we have compared the standard
deviation in reflected shortwave radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mn>0.08</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for an
11-year period across a 100-member ensemble <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.49"/>
of our coupled Earth system model. For a three-member ensemble, this level of
variability implies a 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty in the ERF estimates of about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mn>0.09</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This estimate of the uncertainty is consistent with
the spread across individual ensemble members and is somewhat less for the
clear-sky estimates. Given that the global and annually averaged
anthropogenic AOD in MACv2-SP is 0.027, a clear-sky ERF of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a radiative efficiency of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per unit optical depth. This is in agreement with past
modeling. In a comparison of 16 state-of-the-art chemistry climate
models, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.50"/> calculated a median radiative efficiency of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and, excluding one obvious outlier, the most negative
radiative efficiency among the models is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>27.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Annual means of instantaneous radiative forcing and adjustments.
Instantaneous radiative forcing is shown as calculated using a double radiation call
(left) and difference between IRF and ERF, i.e., adjustments (right).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/433/2017/gmd-10-433-2017-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>As a sensitivity study, we performed two additional simulations with different
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in industrial plumes. In one simulation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, whose
base value is 0.93, was increased to 0.96. In a second simulation, it was
decreased to 0.87, giving the industrial plumes the same value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as
the biomass-burning-dominated plumes. Increasing the single-scattering albedo
by 0.03 increases the clear-sky ERF to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Likewise,
decreasing it by 0.06 reduces the clear-sky ERF to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
From this it appears that, for small changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
industrial plumes, the clear-sky ERF (and the radiative efficiency) responds
roughly linearly in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ERF</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>By increasing the background albedo, clouds reduce the clear-sky ERF by about
a factor of 3 from what it would be if there were no clouds. This is
illustrated by comparing the clear-sky ERF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the
all-sky ERF in a simulation in which aerosol–cloud interactions are
neglected. The middle panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/> presents the result of this
calculation. Without aerosol–cloud interactions, the all-sky ERF is about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. We call this effect of clouds a “cloud masking” as the
clouds mask (or alter) the radiative effect from changes to the clear-sky
aerosol, even in cases where the clear-sky aerosol is above the cloud. The
simulations yield a cloud masking factor of 0.33. In the AeroCom Phase II
models analyzed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.51"/>, the median cloud masking factor is
0.37, with considerable scatter among models. The MACv2-SP implementation of
the anthropogenic aerosol in the MPI-ESM1.2 gives an all-sky radiative
forcing from aerosol–radiation interactions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per unit
optical depth), in agreement with the median of the AeroCom II model
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>Part of the damping of aerosol–radiation interactions by clouds is offset
when clouds are allowed to be influenced by the aerosol. Including a Twomey
effect parameterized by MACv2-SP increases the magnitude of the ERF to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> so that overall clouds contribute to a small reduction
in the magnitude of the ERF over what one would calculate were there no
clouds in the atmosphere. In a companion paper, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.52"/>
explore the degree to which aerosol–cloud interactions offset the cloud masking
effect on aerosol–radiation interactions and show that this
depends primarily on how pristine one assumes the background atmosphere to be.</p>
      <p>Differences between the ERF and instantaneous radiative forcing (IRF) suggest that changes
in the system, adjustments, act to reduce the forcing by about 20 %.
Double radiation calls yield very stable estimates of the IRF in our model,
with a pattern more similar to the distribution of the aerosol than that of
the clear-sky ERF. This is illustrated in the left panel of
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>. The figure also illustrates that the IRF is more
negative than the all-sky ERF. The pattern of adjustments will be sensitive
to noise in the regional structure of ERF estimates, despite an attempt to
minimize these through the use of a long runs (10 years) and ensembles of
simulations, so that we hesitate to overinterpret its structure. It will be
interesting to see if other models forced with the same aerosol MACv2-SP
produce similar patterns of adjustments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>An empirically based analytic parameterization of anthropogenic (post-1850)
aerosol optical properties and their associated Twomey effect, MACv2-SP, has
been developed for use in climate modeling studies. MACv2-SP is empirical in
that it is fit to the gridded MACv2 climatology, and thereby is directly
constrained by understanding and measurements of the spatial distribution of
the present-day anthropogenic aerosol. An analytic description was motivated
by a desire to ease implementation and input data requirements, thereby
helping ensure that the climatology could be consistently implemented across
a range of models, including very-high-resolution models, and also varied
easily. By describing the aerosol in terms of the post-1850 anthropogenic
perturbation, MACv2-SP avoids the problem of perturbing the control climate
of models in which it is implemented. By proposing a plausible representation
of the anthropogenic aerosol that can be consistently implemented in many
climate models, robust and consistent responses to aerosol forcing may emerge
and these could provide a stronger top-down constraint on the magnitude of
that forcing.</p>
      <p>It is demonstrated that a plume-based model, which we call MACv2-SP, with
relatively few degrees of freedom adequately captures the more complex MACv2
grid-point climatology. A total of nine plumes, describing the patterns of aerosol
optical properties attributable to major emission regions, were sufficient to
capture spatial variations in the anthropogenic aerosol. Each plume is in
turn constructed from two independent features designed to capture
differences in the near- and far-field aerosol response to sources and
differences in meteorology that shape the plumes. Account was also taken of
the annual cycle, the vertical distribution and the spectral dependence of
aerosol optical properties. Perturbations to cloud active properties
associated with the anthropogenic aerosol were scaled by fine-mode aerosol
optical depth, using relationships derived from observational data and more
comprehensive modeling. Despite its vastly reduced number of degrees of
freedom, MACv2-SP is capable of reproducing the spatial distribution and
amplitude of the anthropogenic AOD in MACv2, fitting
the observations better (RMSE of 0.19 versus an AeroCom median RMSE of 0.63)
than what is presently possible using process-based models. Other features,
such as total AOD and the ratio of Northern Hemisphere to Southern Hemisphere
loading, are also well captured by MACv2-SP.</p>
      <p>MACv2-SP represents temporal variations in the anthropogenic aerosol by
scaling the strength of its plumes in the year 2005 by estimates of historic
(or possibly projections of future) emissions. In deriving the temporal
scaling, both nitrate-like and sulfate-like aerosol precursors are accounted
for. By “nitrate-like” or “sulfate-like” we mean that the temporal
scaling of the precursors is like ammonia or like sulfur dioxide, but could
in reality be attributable to a broader range of anthropogenic aerosol
sources. These scaling factors are derived by associating national emission
inventories with the nine plumes and provide a simple way of linking
knowledge of aerosol emissions to plausible patterns of radiative forcing.</p>
      <p>The approach underlying MACv2-SP is based on a single or guiding assumption:
the difference between the climate response by a model using a fully
interactive description of the aerosol, as compared to a climatological
description of aerosol properties tuned to give the same radiative forcing,
is small as compared to uncertainties arising from other sources, e.g., cloud
parameterizations. This assumption, though common to any climatology,
emphasizes that MACv2-SP is meant to be a reference aerosol-forcing
climatology, not a reference aerosol climatology. Serving this purpose
requires sufficient degrees of freedom to match both the radiative forcing
arising from aerosol–cloud interactions and aerosol–radiation interactions,
at the surface and the top of the atmosphere, and also describe the
large-scale pattern of regional forcing. As a reference forcing climatology,
MACv2-SP should not be interpreted in terms of its nominal physical parameters, but
rather in terms of the radiative forcing it produces.</p>
      <p>In constructing MACv2-SP, we have made a number of simplifications or
secondary assumptions. We call these “secondary” because they are easy to
modify without altering the basic approach. Nonetheless, because these
simplifications reflect our beliefs as to what features of the anthropogenic
aerosol are unimportant to the climate response, they are itemized here in
the hope that they might help guide and focus future research. These are<def-list>
          <def-item><term>S1:</term><def>

      <p>that MACv2 adequately describes the spatial distribution of the anthropogenic aerosol;</p>
          </def></def-item>
          <def-item><term>S2:</term><def>

      <p>that the anthropogenic aerosol burden associated with a given plume scales
linearly with the weighted emissions of anthropogenic SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the geographic vicinity of that
plume;</p>
          </def></def-item>
          <def-item><term>S3:</term><def>

      <p>that the annual cycle affects only the amplitude of plume features but
not their shape, and that the strength (amplitude) of the seasonal cycle is
proportional to the mean strength of each plume feature;</p>
          </def></def-item>
          <def-item><term>S4:</term><def>

      <p>that the climate response attributable to changes in the character of
the aerosol over time (as measured by its cloud activity, and intensive properties
like single-scattering albedo or asymmetry factor), are small as compared to changes
in extensive properties, i.e., the anthropogenic aerosol optical depth;</p>
          </def></def-item>
          <def-item><term>S5:</term><def>

      <p>that the local effect of the aerosol on cloud optical properties
scales logarithmically with a linear function of anthropogenic fine-mode aerosol.</p>
          </def></def-item>
        </def-list></p>
      <p>The climatology is constructed in a manner that makes it easy to relax and
test many of these assumptions. For instance, the parameterization of the
Twomey effect is easy to modify; likewise, the assumption that the
single-scattering albedo of industrial plumes have not changed over the
historical period can be relaxed. Although focusing on the
simplifications itemized above encourages the thought that the climatological
approach is too simple, it may well be that it is already more detailed than
is really necessary for most purposes. For instance, there is scant evidence
that many of the features which we endeavor to incorporate, such as the
seasonal cycle, details of the plume shape or even such a large number of
plumes, are important for the climate response. For this reason, future work
should also explore the effect of simplifying MACv2-SP, as it may well turn
out that even a substantially simpler implementation can capture the main
response of the climate system to forcing.</p>
      <p>MACv2-SP is implemented into the Earth system model of the Max Planck
Institute for Meteorology (the MPI-ESM1.2), and an ensemble of simulations is
used to estimate instantaneous and effective radiative forcing. Both forcing
estimates for clear-sky and all-sky conditions are calculated. The all-sky effective
radiative forcing is estimated from the simulations to be
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Clouds, by masking aerosol–radiation interactions,
diminish the forcing, something that is partially offset by accounting for
aerosol–cloud interactions. As a result, the net effect of clouds on aerosol
radiative forcing is small but slightly positive, as the clear-sky effective
radiative forcing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is more negative than the all-sky
radiative forcing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Because cloud masking effects are
not independent of the aerosol–cloud interactions, the effect of clouds,
which are small here, can be inflated if the two effects are considered
independently, as is usually the case. An instantaneous radiative forcing
(all-sky) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is associated with the MPI-ESM1.2
implementation of MACv2-SP, as estimated from a double call to radiation.
Adjustments, defined as the difference between the effective and
instantaneous radiative forcing thus also act to weaken the overall forcing
by about 20 %.</p>
      <p>Though an effort has been made to characterize different measures of the
radiative forcing associated with the MPI-ESM1.2 implementation of MACv2-SP,
these numbers are intended more as a characterization of MACv2-SP and less
as a new estimate of aerosol forcing. Although developed to mimic MACv2 and
the synthesis of past AeroCom studies, MACv2 has been formulated so that it
should be easy to adjust parameters to match other estimates of forcing, for
instance, to allow for more potent aerosol–cloud interactions. The real
purpose behind the development of MACv2-SP is to enable its use across a
range of models in the hope that robust model responses emerge in a way that
identifies additional constraints on the magnitude of the forcing, for
instance, through detection and attribution approaches centered around the
pattern of the response. Such an effort would be aided if MACv2-SP is adopted
for use by other models.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Data and code availability</title>
      <p>The MACv2-SP climatology, including algorithms and input data used to
generate the climatology, is provided as an electronic supplement to this
paper. Primary data and scripts used in the analysis and other
supplementary information that may be useful in reproducing the author's work
are archived by the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology and can be obtained
by contacting publications@mpimet.mpg.de.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-433-2017-supplement" xlink:title="zip">doi:10.5194/gmd-10-433-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Bjorn Stevens conceived the simple plume model, implemented it based on
a prototype developed by the whole team and wrote the paper.
Stephanie Fiedler helped with the implementation and tuning of the model and
contributed to the writing of the paper. Stephanie Fiedler,
Bjorn Stevens and Thorsten Mauritsen designed and evaluated the ECHAM
experiments which were performed by Thorsten Mauritsen and Stephanie Fiedler.
Stefan Kinne led the development of the underlying MACv2 climatology,
performed the offline radiative calculations, advised on the design of the
plume model and, together with Jobst Müsse, Bjorn Stevens and Stephanie
Fiedler, designed the cloud active component. Jobst Müsse performed the
analysis of the AeroCom II models and climatological datasets of droplet
number. Steven J. Smith helped with the provision of the historical forcing
data. Karsten Peters and Sebastian Rast designed the plume model, contributed
text describing its formulation and provided the initial tuning of this
model.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors acknowledge the generous and unfettered support of the Max Planck
Society. Use of the supercomputer facilities at the Deutsches
Klimarechenzentrum (DKRZ) is acknowledged as is funding from the FP7 project
BACCHUS (no. 603445). Aiko Voigt is thanked for contributions to the
early development of the plume ideas. The reviewers are acknowledged for
their constructive contributions to the improvement of the presentation of
our ideas.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> The article processing charges for
this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by the Max Planck
Society.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: J. Williams<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Andreae(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O.: Correlation between cloud condensation nuclei concentration
and aerosol optical thickness in remote and polluted regions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 543–556, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-543-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-543-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Baker and Charlson(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, M. B. and Charlson, R. J.: Bistability of CCN concentrations and
thermodynamics in the cloud-topped boundary layer, Nature, 345, 142–145,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bellouin et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Bellouin, N., Rae, J., Jones, A., Johnson, C., Haywood, J., and Boucher, O.:
Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)
simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, D20206, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016074</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bennartz(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Bennartz, R.: Global assessment of marine boundary layer cloud droplet
number concentration from satellite, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D02201,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007547</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bollasina et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Bollasina, M. A., Ming, Y., and Ramaswamy, V.: Anthropogenic Aerosols and
the Weakening of the South Asian Summer Monsoon, Science, 334, 502–505,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Boucher and Lohmann(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O. and Lohmann, U.: The sulfate-CCN-cloud albedo effect: A
sensitivity study with two general circulation models, Tellus B, 47,
281–300, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols,
in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor,
M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley,
P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA,
571–657, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Brenguier et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Brenguier, J. L., Pawlowska, H., and Schüller, L.: Radiative properties
of boundary layer clouds: Droplet effective radius versus number
concentration, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 803–821, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Carslaw et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, K. S., Lee, L. A., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Rap, A.,
Forster, P. M., Mann, G. W., Spracklen, D. V., Woodhouse, M. T., Regayre,
L. A., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to
uncertainty in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67–71, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Charlson et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J., Schwartz, S. E., Hales, J. M., Cess, R. D., Coakley, J. A.,
Hansen, J. E., and Hofmann, D. J.: Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols,
Science, 255, 423–430, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Christensen and Stephens(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Christensen, M. W. and Stephens, G. L.: Microphysical and macrophysical
responses of marine stratocumulus polluted by underlying ships: Evidence of
cloud deepening, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D03201,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014638" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014638</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Deser et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Deser, C., Phillips, A. S., Alexander, M. A., and Smoliak, B. V.: Projecting
North American Climate over the Next 50 Years: Uncertainty due to Internal
Variability, J. Climate, 27, 2271–2296, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Dubovik et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Holben, B., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King,
M. D., Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of Absorption and
Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations, J.
Atmos. Sci, 59, 590–608, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Eyring et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R.
J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9,
1937–1958, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Fiedler et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Fiedler, S., Stevens, B., and Mauritsen, T.: On the importance of climate
variability and a Twomey effect for the aerosol effective radiative forcing,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., in review, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Giorgetta et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Giorgetta, M. A., Jungclaus, J., Reick, C. H., Legutke, S., Bader, J.,
Böttinger, M., Brovkin, V., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fieg, K., Glushak, K.,
Gayler, V., Haak, H., Hollweg, H. D., Ilyina, T., Kinne, S., Kornblueh, L.,
Matei, D., Mauritsen, T., Mikolajewicz, U., Mueller, W., Notz, D., Pithan,
F., Raddatz, T., Rast, S., Redler, R., Roeckner, E., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R.,
Segschneider, J., Six, K. D., Stockhause, M., Timmreck, C., Wegner, J.,
Widmann, H., Wieners, K. H., Claussen, M., Marotzke, J., and Stevens, B.:
Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations
for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 5, 572–597, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Grosvenor and Wood(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Grosvenor, D. P. and Wood, R.: The effect of solar zenith angle on MODIS
cloud optical and microphysical retrievals within marine liquid water clouds,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7291–7321, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7291-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7291-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Haywood et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J., Jones, A., Malavelle, F., Gettelman, A., Allan, R. P., Bellouin,
N., Boucher, O., Bauduin, S., Carslaw, K. S., Carslaw, K., Clarisse, L., Coe,
H., Dalvi, M., Dhomse, S., Grosvenor, D., Hartley, M., Johnson, B., Johnson,
C., Knight, J., Kristiansen, J.-E., Mann, G., Myhre, G., OConnor, F.,
Platnick, S., Schmidt, A., Stephens, G. L., Stier, P., and Takahashi, H.:
Validating global model predictions of aerosol-cloud interactions using a
large volcanic fissure eruption, Nature, submitted, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Holben et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Tanré, D., Smirnov, A., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I.,
Abuhassan, N., Newcomb, W., Schafer, J., Catenet, B., Lavenu, F., Kaufman,
Y., Vande Castle, J., Setzer, A., Markham, B., Clark, D., Frouin, R.,
Halthore, R., Karneli, A., O'Neill, N., Pietras, C., Pinker, R., Voss, K.,
and Zibordi, G.: An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol
optical depth from AERONET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 12067–12097,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Khain et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Khain, A., Lynn, B., and Dudhia, J.: Aerosol Effects on Intensity of
Landfalling Hurricanes as Seen from Simulations with the WRF Model with
Spectral Bin Microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci, 67, 365–384, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Kinne et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Kinne, S., Schulz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E.,
Berntsen, T., Berglen, T. F., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener,
F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P.,
Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Herzog, M., Horowitz, L., Isaksen, I.,
Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kristjansson, J. E.,
Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U.,
Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O.,
Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: An AeroCom initial assessment –
optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 1815–1834, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Kinne et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Kinne, S., O'Donnel, D., Stier, P., Kloster, S., Zhang, K., Schmidt, H.,
Rast, S., Giorgetta, M., Eck, T. F., and Stevens, B.: MAC-v1: A new global
aerosol climatology for climate studies, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5,
704–740, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Kirkby et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson,
C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., Tröstl, J., Nieminen,
T., Ortega, I. K., Wagner, R., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bernhammer, A.-K.,
Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Chen, X., Craven, J., Dias, A.,
Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Hakala, J.,
Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Kim, J., Krapf, M.,
Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S.,
Molteni, U., Onnela, A., Peräkylä, O., Piel, F., Petäjä, T.,
Praplan, A. P., Pringle, K., Rap, A., Richards, N. A. D., Riipinen, I.,
Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F.,
Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C., Wagner, P. E.,
Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Zhang, X., Hansel, A.,
Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M.,
Carslaw, K. S., and Curtius, J.: Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic
particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Leibensperger et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Leibensperger, E. M., Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Chen, W.-T., Seinfeld, J.
H., Nenes, A., Adams, P. J., Streets, D. G., Kumar, N., and Rind, D.:
Climatic effects of 1950–2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols – Part
2: Climate response, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3349–3362,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3349-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3349-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Meehl et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Meehl, G. A., Hu, A., and Santer, B. D.: The Mid-1970s Climate Shift in the
Pacific and the Relative Roles of Forced versus Inherent Decadal
Variability, J. Climate, 22, 780–792, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Murphy et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Solomon, S., Portmann, R. W., Rosenlof, K. H., Forster, P. M.,
and Wong, T.: An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since
1950, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D17107, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012105</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Myhre et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Samset, B. H., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T.
K., Bian, H., Bellouin, N., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Feichter, J.,
Ghan, S. J., Hauglustaine, D., Iversen, T., Kinne, S., Kirkevåg, A.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Lund, M. T., Luo, G., Ma, X., van Noije,
T., Penner, J. E., Rasch, P. J., Ruiz, A., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B.,
Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., Wang, P., Wang, Z., Xu, L., Yu, H.,
Yu, F., Yoon, J.-H., Zhang, K., Zhang, H., and Zhou, C.: Radiative forcing of
the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 1853–1877, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Nakajima et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Nakajima, T., King, M. D., Spinhirne, J. D., and Radke, L. F.: Determination
of the Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Radius of Clouds from
Reflected Solar Radiation Measurements – Part 2: Marine Stratocumulus
Observations, J. Atmos. Sci, 48, 728–751, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Pincus et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Pincus, R., Forster, P. M., and Stevens, B.: The Radiative Forcing Model
Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): experimental protocol for CMIP6, Geosci.
Model Dev., 9, 3447–3460, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3447-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-3447-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Quaas et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Quaas, J., Ming, Y., Menon, S., Takemura, T., Wang, M., Penner, J. E.,
Gettelman, A., Lohmann, U., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Sayer, A. M., Thomas,
G. E., McComiskey, A., Feingold, G., Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., Liu,
X., Balkanski, Y., Donner, L. J., Ginoux, P. A., Stier, P., Grandey, B.,
Feichter, J., Sednev, I., Bauer, S. E., Koch, D., Grainger, R. G.,
Kirkevåg, A., Iversen, T., Seland, Ø., Easter, R., Ghan, S. J., Rasch,
P. J., Morrison, H., Lamarque, J.-F., Iacono, M. J., Kinne, S., and Schulz,
M.: Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and
evaluation with satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8697–8717,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8697-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-8697-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Ramanathan et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosols,
Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle, Science, 294, 2119–2124, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Schulz et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Schulz, M., Textor, C., Kinne, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T.,
Berglen, T., Boucher, O., Dentener, F., Guibert, S., Isaksen, I. S. A.,
Iversen, T., Koch, D., Kirkevåg, A., Liu, X., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G.,
Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, Ø., Stier, P., and Takemura,
T.: Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and
pre-industrial simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5225–5246,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Sherwood et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Sherwood, S. C., Bony, S., Boucher, O., Bretherton, C., Forster, P. M.,
Gregory, J. M., and Stevens, B.: Adjustments in the Forcing-Feedback
Framework for Understanding Climate Change, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96,
217–228, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Shindell et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Shindell, D. T., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Flanner, M., Jiao, C., Chin,
M., Young, P. J., Lee, Y. H., Rotstayn, L., Mahowald, N., Milly, G.,
Faluvegi, G., Balkanski, Y., Collins, W. J., Conley, A. J., Dalsoren, S.,
Easter, R., Ghan, S., Horowitz, L., Liu, X., Myhre, G., Nagashima, T., Naik,
V., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Takemura, T.,
Voulgarakis, A., Yoon, J.-H., and Lo, F.: Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP
historical and future climate simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
2939–2974, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2939-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2939-2013</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Smirnov et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Slutsker, I., Giles, D. M., McClain, C. R., Eck,
T. F., Sakerin, S. M., Macke, A., Croot, P., Zibordi, G., Quinn, P. K.,
Sciare, J., Kinne, S., Harvey, M., Smyth, T. J., Piketh, S., Zielinski, T.,
Proshutinsky, A., Goes, J. I., Nelson, N. B., Larouche, P., Radionov, V. F.,
Goloub, P., Krishna Moorthy, K., Matarrese, R., Robertson, E. J., and
Jourdin, F.: Maritime Aerosol Network as a component of Aerosol Robotic
Network, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D06204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011257</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Stevens(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Stevens, B.: Rethinking the Lower Bound on Aerosol Radiative Forcing, J.
Climate, 28, 4794–4819, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Stevens and Feingold(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and
precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Stevens et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Stevens, B., Giorgetta, M., Esch, M., Mauritsen, T., Crueger, T., Rast, S.,
Salzmann, M., Schmidt, H., Bader, J., Block, K., Brokopf, R., Fast, I.,
Kinne, S., Kornblueh, L., Lohmann, U., Pincus, R., Reichler, T., and
Roeckner, E.: Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model:
ECHAM6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5, 146–172, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Tanré et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Tanré, D., Geleyn, J. F., and Slingo, J. M.: First results of the intro-
duction of an advanced aerosol-radiation interaction in the ECMWF low
resolution global model , in: Aerosols and Their Climatic Effects
Proceedings of the Meetings of Experts, edited by: Gerber, H. and Deepak, A.,
Hampton, VA, 133–177, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Thomas et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, G. E., Poulsen, C. A., Siddans, R., Carbon, E., Sayer, A. M., and
Grainger, R. G.: ORAC v3 Dual-view aerosol retrieval from AATSR, Tech.
rep., Oxford University, Oxford, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Twomey(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Twomey, S.: The nuclei of natural cloud formation part II: The
supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet
concentration, Pure Appl. Geophys., 43, 243–249, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Voigt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, A., Bony, S., Dufresne, J.-L., and Stevens, B.: The radiative impact
of clouds on the shift of the Intertropical Convergence Zone, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 4308–4315, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Wild(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Wild, M.: Enlightening Global Dimming and Brightening, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 93, 27–37, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Zhang et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Delworth, T. L., Sutton, R., Hodson, D. L. R., Dixon, K. W., Held,
I. M., Kushnir, Y., Marshall, J., Ming, Y., Msadek, R., Robson, J., Rosati,
A. J., Ting, M., and Vecchi, G. A.: Have Aerosols Caused the Observed
Atlantic Multidecadal Variability?, J. Atmos. Sci, 70, 1135–1144, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>MACv2-SP: a parameterization of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated Twomey effect for use in CMIP6</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">A simple plume implementation of the second version (v2) of the Max Planck
Institute Aerosol Climatology, MACv2-SP, is described. MACv2-SP provides a
prescription of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated
Twomey effect. It was created to provide a harmonized description of
post-1850 anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing for climate modeling
studies. MACv2-SP has been designed to be easy to implement, change and use,
and thereby enable studies exploring the climatic effects of different
patterns of aerosol radiative forcing, including a Twomey effect. MACv2-SP is
formulated in terms of nine spatial plumes associated with different major
anthropogenic source regions. The shape of the plumes is fit to the Max
Planck Institute Aerosol Climatology, version 2, whose present-day (2005)
distribution is anchored by surface-based observations. Two types of plumes
are considered: one predominantly associated with biomass burning, the other
with industrial emissions. These differ in the prescription of their annual
cycle and in their optical properties, thereby implicitly accounting for
different contributions of absorbing aerosol to the different plumes. A
Twomey effect for each plume is prescribed as a change in the host model's
background cloud-droplet population density using relationships derived from
satellite data. Year-to-year variations in the amplitude of the plumes over
the historical period (1850–2016) are derived by scaling the plumes with
associated national emission sources of SO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub>. Experiments using
MACv2-SP are performed with the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model. The
globally and annually averaged instantaneous and effective aerosol radiative
forcings are estimated to be −0.6 and −0.5 W m<sup>−2</sup>, respectively.
Forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions (the Twomey effect) offsets the
reduction of clear-sky forcing by clouds, so that the net effect of clouds on
the aerosol forcing is small; hence, the clear-sky forcing, which is more
readily measurable, provides a good estimate of the total aerosol forcing.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Andreae(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O.: Correlation between cloud condensation nuclei concentration
and aerosol optical thickness in remote and polluted regions, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 543–556, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-543-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-543-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Baker and Charlson(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, M. B. and Charlson, R. J.: Bistability of CCN concentrations and
thermodynamics in the cloud-topped boundary layer, Nature, 345, 142–145,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bellouin et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Bellouin, N., Rae, J., Jones, A., Johnson, C., Haywood, J., and Boucher, O.:
Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)
simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, D20206, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JD016074</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bennartz(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Bennartz, R.: Global assessment of marine boundary layer cloud droplet
number concentration from satellite, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D02201,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007547" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JD007547</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bollasina et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Bollasina, M. A., Ming, Y., and Ramaswamy, V.: Anthropogenic Aerosols and
the Weakening of the South Asian Summer Monsoon, Science, 334, 502–505,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Boucher and Lohmann(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O. and Lohmann, U.: The sulfate-CCN-cloud albedo effect: A
sensitivity study with two general circulation models, Tellus B, 47,
281–300, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols,
in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor,
M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley,
P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA,
571–657, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Brenguier et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Brenguier, J. L., Pawlowska, H., and Schüller, L.: Radiative properties
of boundary layer clouds: Droplet effective radius versus number
concentration, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 803–821, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Carslaw et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Carslaw, K. S., Lee, L. A., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Rap, A.,
Forster, P. M., Mann, G. W., Spracklen, D. V., Woodhouse, M. T., Regayre,
L. A., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to
uncertainty in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67–71, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Charlson et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J., Schwartz, S. E., Hales, J. M., Cess, R. D., Coakley, J. A.,
Hansen, J. E., and Hofmann, D. J.: Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols,
Science, 255, 423–430, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Christensen and Stephens(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Christensen, M. W. and Stephens, G. L.: Microphysical and macrophysical
responses of marine stratocumulus polluted by underlying ships: Evidence of
cloud deepening, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D03201,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014638" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010JD014638</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Deser et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Deser, C., Phillips, A. S., Alexander, M. A., and Smoliak, B. V.: Projecting
North American Climate over the Next 50 Years: Uncertainty due to Internal
Variability, J. Climate, 27, 2271–2296, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Dubovik et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Holben, B., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King,
M. D., Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of Absorption and
Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations, J.
Atmos. Sci, 59, 590–608, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Eyring et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R.
J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9,
1937–1958, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Fiedler et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Fiedler, S., Stevens, B., and Mauritsen, T.: On the importance of climate
variability and a Twomey effect for the aerosol effective radiative forcing,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., in review, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Giorgetta et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Giorgetta, M. A., Jungclaus, J., Reick, C. H., Legutke, S., Bader, J.,
Böttinger, M., Brovkin, V., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fieg, K., Glushak, K.,
Gayler, V., Haak, H., Hollweg, H. D., Ilyina, T., Kinne, S., Kornblueh, L.,
Matei, D., Mauritsen, T., Mikolajewicz, U., Mueller, W., Notz, D., Pithan,
F., Raddatz, T., Rast, S., Redler, R., Roeckner, E., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R.,
Segschneider, J., Six, K. D., Stockhause, M., Timmreck, C., Wegner, J.,
Widmann, H., Wieners, K. H., Claussen, M., Marotzke, J., and Stevens, B.:
Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations
for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 5, 572–597, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Grosvenor and Wood(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Grosvenor, D. P. and Wood, R.: The effect of solar zenith angle on MODIS
cloud optical and microphysical retrievals within marine liquid water clouds,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7291–7321, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7291-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-7291-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Haywood et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J., Jones, A., Malavelle, F., Gettelman, A., Allan, R. P., Bellouin,
N., Boucher, O., Bauduin, S., Carslaw, K. S., Carslaw, K., Clarisse, L., Coe,
H., Dalvi, M., Dhomse, S., Grosvenor, D., Hartley, M., Johnson, B., Johnson,
C., Knight, J., Kristiansen, J.-E., Mann, G., Myhre, G., OConnor, F.,
Platnick, S., Schmidt, A., Stephens, G. L., Stier, P., and Takahashi, H.:
Validating global model predictions of aerosol-cloud interactions using a
large volcanic fissure eruption, Nature, submitted, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Holben et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Tanré, D., Smirnov, A., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I.,
Abuhassan, N., Newcomb, W., Schafer, J., Catenet, B., Lavenu, F., Kaufman,
Y., Vande Castle, J., Setzer, A., Markham, B., Clark, D., Frouin, R.,
Halthore, R., Karneli, A., O'Neill, N., Pietras, C., Pinker, R., Voss, K.,
and Zibordi, G.: An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol
optical depth from AERONET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 12067–12097,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Khain et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Khain, A., Lynn, B., and Dudhia, J.: Aerosol Effects on Intensity of
Landfalling Hurricanes as Seen from Simulations with the WRF Model with
Spectral Bin Microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci, 67, 365–384, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Kinne et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Kinne, S., Schulz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E.,
Berntsen, T., Berglen, T. F., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener,
F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P.,
Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Herzog, M., Horowitz, L., Isaksen, I.,
Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kristjansson, J. E.,
Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U.,
Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O.,
Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: An AeroCom initial assessment –
optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 6, 1815–1834, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Kinne et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Kinne, S., O'Donnel, D., Stier, P., Kloster, S., Zhang, K., Schmidt, H.,
Rast, S., Giorgetta, M., Eck, T. F., and Stevens, B.: MAC-v1: A new global
aerosol climatology for climate studies, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5,
704–740, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Kirkby et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson,
C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., Tröstl, J., Nieminen,
T., Ortega, I. K., Wagner, R., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bernhammer, A.-K.,
Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Chen, X., Craven, J., Dias, A.,
Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Hakala, J.,
Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Kim, J., Krapf, M.,
Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S.,
Molteni, U., Onnela, A., Peräkylä, O., Piel, F., Petäjä, T.,
Praplan, A. P., Pringle, K., Rap, A., Richards, N. A. D., Riipinen, I.,
Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F.,
Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C., Wagner, P. E.,
Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Zhang, X., Hansel, A.,
Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M.,
Carslaw, K. S., and Curtius, J.: Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic
particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Leibensperger et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Leibensperger, E. M., Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Chen, W.-T., Seinfeld, J.
H., Nenes, A., Adams, P. J., Streets, D. G., Kumar, N., and Rind, D.:
Climatic effects of 1950–2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols – Part
2: Climate response, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3349–3362,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3349-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-3349-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Meehl et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Meehl, G. A., Hu, A., and Santer, B. D.: The Mid-1970s Climate Shift in the
Pacific and the Relative Roles of Forced versus Inherent Decadal
Variability, J. Climate, 22, 780–792, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Murphy et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Solomon, S., Portmann, R. W., Rosenlof, K. H., Forster, P. M.,
and Wong, T.: An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since
1950, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D17107, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012105" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD012105</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Myhre et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Myhre, G., Samset, B. H., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T.
K., Bian, H., Bellouin, N., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Feichter, J.,
Ghan, S. J., Hauglustaine, D., Iversen, T., Kinne, S., Kirkevåg, A.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Lund, M. T., Luo, G., Ma, X., van Noije,
T., Penner, J. E., Rasch, P. J., Ruiz, A., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B.,
Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., Wang, P., Wang, Z., Xu, L., Yu, H.,
Yu, F., Yoon, J.-H., Zhang, K., Zhang, H., and Zhou, C.: Radiative forcing of
the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 1853–1877, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Nakajima et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Nakajima, T., King, M. D., Spinhirne, J. D., and Radke, L. F.: Determination
of the Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Radius of Clouds from
Reflected Solar Radiation Measurements – Part 2: Marine Stratocumulus
Observations, J. Atmos. Sci, 48, 728–751, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Pincus et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Pincus, R., Forster, P. M., and Stevens, B.: The Radiative Forcing Model
Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): experimental protocol for CMIP6, Geosci.
Model Dev., 9, 3447–3460, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3447-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-9-3447-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Quaas et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Quaas, J., Ming, Y., Menon, S., Takemura, T., Wang, M., Penner, J. E.,
Gettelman, A., Lohmann, U., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Sayer, A. M., Thomas,
G. E., McComiskey, A., Feingold, G., Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., Liu,
X., Balkanski, Y., Donner, L. J., Ginoux, P. A., Stier, P., Grandey, B.,
Feichter, J., Sednev, I., Bauer, S. E., Koch, D., Grainger, R. G.,
Kirkevåg, A., Iversen, T., Seland, Ø., Easter, R., Ghan, S. J., Rasch,
P. J., Morrison, H., Lamarque, J.-F., Iacono, M. J., Kinne, S., and Schulz,
M.: Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and
evaluation with satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8697–8717,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8697-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-8697-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Ramanathan et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T., and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosols,
Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle, Science, 294, 2119–2124, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Schulz et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, M., Textor, C., Kinne, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T.,
Berglen, T., Boucher, O., Dentener, F., Guibert, S., Isaksen, I. S. A.,
Iversen, T., Koch, D., Kirkevåg, A., Liu, X., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G.,
Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, Ø., Stier, P., and Takemura,
T.: Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and
pre-industrial simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5225–5246,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Sherwood et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Sherwood, S. C., Bony, S., Boucher, O., Bretherton, C., Forster, P. M.,
Gregory, J. M., and Stevens, B.: Adjustments in the Forcing-Feedback
Framework for Understanding Climate Change, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96,
217–228, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Shindell et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Shindell, D. T., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Flanner, M., Jiao, C., Chin,
M., Young, P. J., Lee, Y. H., Rotstayn, L., Mahowald, N., Milly, G.,
Faluvegi, G., Balkanski, Y., Collins, W. J., Conley, A. J., Dalsoren, S.,
Easter, R., Ghan, S., Horowitz, L., Liu, X., Myhre, G., Nagashima, T., Naik,
V., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Takemura, T.,
Voulgarakis, A., Yoon, J.-H., and Lo, F.: Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP
historical and future climate simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13,
2939–2974, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2939-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-13-2939-2013</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Smirnov et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Slutsker, I., Giles, D. M., McClain, C. R., Eck,
T. F., Sakerin, S. M., Macke, A., Croot, P., Zibordi, G., Quinn, P. K.,
Sciare, J., Kinne, S., Harvey, M., Smyth, T. J., Piketh, S., Zielinski, T.,
Proshutinsky, A., Goes, J. I., Nelson, N. B., Larouche, P., Radionov, V. F.,
Goloub, P., Krishna Moorthy, K., Matarrese, R., Robertson, E. J., and
Jourdin, F.: Maritime Aerosol Network as a component of Aerosol Robotic
Network, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D06204, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011257" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD011257</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Stevens(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Stevens, B.: Rethinking the Lower Bound on Aerosol Radiative Forcing, J.
Climate, 28, 4794–4819, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Stevens and Feingold(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and
precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Stevens et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Stevens, B., Giorgetta, M., Esch, M., Mauritsen, T., Crueger, T., Rast, S.,
Salzmann, M., Schmidt, H., Bader, J., Block, K., Brokopf, R., Fast, I.,
Kinne, S., Kornblueh, L., Lohmann, U., Pincus, R., Reichler, T., and
Roeckner, E.: Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model:
ECHAM6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5, 146–172, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Tanré et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Tanré, D., Geleyn, J. F., and Slingo, J. M.: First results of the intro-
duction of an advanced aerosol-radiation interaction in the ECMWF low
resolution global model , in: Aerosols and Their Climatic Effects
Proceedings of the Meetings of Experts, edited by: Gerber, H. and Deepak, A.,
Hampton, VA, 133–177, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Thomas et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, G. E., Poulsen, C. A., Siddans, R., Carbon, E., Sayer, A. M., and
Grainger, R. G.: ORAC v3 Dual-view aerosol retrieval from AATSR, Tech.
rep., Oxford University, Oxford, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Twomey(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Twomey, S.: The nuclei of natural cloud formation part II: The
supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet
concentration, Pure Appl. Geophys., 43, 243–249, 1959.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Voigt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, A., Bony, S., Dufresne, J.-L., and Stevens, B.: The radiative impact
of clouds on the shift of the Intertropical Convergence Zone, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 4308–4315, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Wild(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Wild, M.: Enlightening Global Dimming and Brightening, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 93, 27–37, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Zhang et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Delworth, T. L., Sutton, R., Hodson, D. L. R., Dixon, K. W., Held,
I. M., Kushnir, Y., Marshall, J., Ming, Y., Msadek, R., Robson, J., Rosati,
A. J., Ting, M., and Vecchi, G. A.: Have Aerosols Caused the Observed
Atlantic Multidecadal Variability?, J. Atmos. Sci, 70, 1135–1144, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
